Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in late gestation in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction and trisomy 22 confined placental mosaicism

Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)

Fetal growth restriction (FGR), or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), is still the second most common cause of perinatal mortality. The factors that contribute to fetal growth restriction can be categorized into three distinct groups: placental, fetal, and maternal. The prenatal application of various diagnostic methods can, in many cases, detect the deterioration of the fetal condition in time because the nature of the above disorder is thoroughly investigated by applying a combination of biophysical and biochemical methods, which determine the state of the embryo-placenta unit and assess the possible increased risk of perinatal failure outcome and potential for many later health problems. When considering the potential for therapeutic intervention, the key question is whether it can be utilized during pregnancy. Currently, there are no known treatment interventions that effectively enhance placental function and promote fetal weight development. Nevertheless, in cases with fetuses diagnosed with fetal growth restriction, immediate termination of pregnancy may have advantages not only in terms of minimizing perinatal mortality but primarily in terms of reducing long-term morbidity during childhood and maturity.

Systematic analysis of the causes of NIPS sex chromosome aneuploidy false-positive results

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the underlying causes of false positives in NIPT of fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidies using fetal cell-free DNA from maternal plasma.

METHODS

In the present study, we focus on a cohort of 23,984 pregnancy cases with NIPT. Karyotyping and FISH analysis were employed to verify the NIPT detected false-positive results of fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidies, and a comparative CNV sequencing on positive and negative NIPT cases was uniquely performed to elucidate the underlying causes.

RESULTS

A total of 166 cases (0.69%) were identified as fetal sex chromosomal abnormalities, while 84 cases were found to be false-positive results possibly associated with maternal X chromosomal aneuploidies (n = 8), maternal X chromosomal structural abnormalities (n = 1), maternal CNVs (n = 4) as well as known placental mosaicism (n = 1). Furthermore, our study showed that the maternal chromosome CNV between 1-1.6 Mb was associated with false-positive NIPT results in sex chromosomal abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrated the spectrum of factors causing false positives in NIPT of fetal sex chromosomal abnormalities based on a large cohort. The effective maternal CNV size cut-off identified in our study could integrate into bioinformatics algorithms for reducing the false-positive rate, however, further investigation is necessary to confirm this.

Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal microarray analysis detects a clinically significant amount of copy number variants in approximately 1% of low-risk pregnancies. As the constantly growing use of noninvasive prenatal screening has facilitated the detection of chromosomal aberrations, defining the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings following normal noninvasive prenatal screening is of importance for making informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

STUDY DESIGN

The chromosomal microarray results of all pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis between the years 2013 and 2021 in a large hospital-based laboratory were collected. Pregnancies with sonographic anomalies, abnormal maternal serum screening, or multiple fetuses were excluded. Clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were divided into the following: 3-noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (trisomies 13, 18, and 21), 5- noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including sex chromosome aberrations), 5-noninvasive prenatal screening and common microdeletion-detectable (including 1p36.3-1p36.2, 4p16.3-4p16.2, 5p15.3-5p15.1, 15q11.2-15q13.1, and 22q11.2 deletions), and genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including variants >7 Mb). The theoretical residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants was calculated following the exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.

RESULTS

Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% (1/94) for 3-noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.78% (1/129) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.74% (1/136) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening including common microdeletions, and 0.68% (1/147) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In the subgroup of 4048 pregnancies with advanced maternal age, the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 1.36% (1/73) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.82% (1/122) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In 3187 pregnancies of women <35 years, this residual risk ranged from 0.69% (1/145) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.5% (1/199) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening.

CONCLUSION

The residual risk of clinically significant copy number variants in pregnancies without structural sonographic anomalies is appreciable and depends on the noninvasive prenatal screening extent and maternal age. This knowledge is important for the patients, obstetricians, and genetic counselors to facilitate informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options.

Prenatal Identification of Confined Placental Mosaicism in Pregnant Women with Fetal Growth Restriction

We examined the influence of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) as a cause of fetal growth restriction (FGR), and whether CPM can be screened using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of the maternal plasma. We analyzed cfDNA in the maternal plasma of 40 FGR cases with an estimated fetal weight of less than - 2.0 SD using massively parallel sequencing to detect chromosomal aberrations. Fetal and placental genotyping was performed to confirm CPM cases. cfDNA analyses of maternal plasma detected suspected CPM cases with chromosomal aneuploidy or copy number variations in 5 of 40 cases (12.5%). For 4 cases in which the entire placenta consisted of cells with chromosomal abnormalities, fetal growth was severely restricted. CPM can be screened by cfDNA analysis in maternal plasma, accounting for approximately 10% of the causes of moderate or severe FGR, and the higher the proportion of abnormal karyotype cells in the placenta, the more severe the placental dysfunction and FGR.

Fetomaternal microchimerism and genetic diagnosis: On the origins of fetal cells and cell-free fetal DNA in the pregnant woman

During pregnancy several types of fetal cells and fetal stem cells, including pregnancy-associated progenitor cells (PAPCs), traffic into the maternal circulation. Whereas they also migrate to various maternal organs and adopt the phenotype of the target tissues to contribute to regenerative processes, fetal cells also play a role in the pathogenesis of maternal diseases. In addition, cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is detectable in the plasma of pregnant women. Together they constitute the well-known phenomenon of fetomaternal microchimerism, which inspired the concept of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using maternal blood. An in-depth knowledge concerning the origins of these fetal cells and cffDNA allows a more comprehensive understanding of the biological relevance of fetomaternal microchimerism and has implications for the ongoing expansion of resultant clinical applications.

Clinical Review of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Experience from 551 Pregnancies with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing-Positive Results in a Tertiary Referral Center

A total of 551 pregnancies with positive results for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using traditional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis were analyzed. Confirmatory results, positive predictive values, etiology exploration of false-positive results, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The study demonstrated that NIPT performed better in predicting trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 for pregnancies with advanced maternal age than for pregnancies with young maternal age; as for trisomy 13 and sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) prediction, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The positive predictive values for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and SCA showed no significant upward trend when compared based on specific age categories (an interval of 5 years), which suggested that NIPT-positive result deserves equal attention from both providers and patients regardless of maternal age. In addition, the termination rates of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX, and 47,XYY were 100% (2/2), 92.9% (26/28), 33.3% (5/15), and 9.5% (2/21), respectively, which demonstrated that the decision-making regarding pregnancies varied greatly according to the types of SCAs, and further reinforce the importance of confirmatory prenatal diagnosis. The current study also supported the viewpoint that confined placental mosaicism and maternal mosaicism were the important etiology of false-positive results.

Mosaic trisomy 22 at amniocentesis: Prenatal diagnosis and literature review

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 22 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with facial cleft, oligohydramnios and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and we review the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+22[9]/46,XX[9]. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes showed a result of arr(22) × 3 [0.8]. Prenatal ultrasound revealed fetal median facial cleft, oligohydramnios and IUGR. Repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation using uncultured amniocytes revealed an aCGH result of arr 22q11.1q13.33 (17,397,498-51,178,264) × 2.8 compatible with 80% mosaicism for trisomy 22, and a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) result of mosaic trisomy 22 with trisomy 22 in 54/100 interphase cells. The cultured amniocytes at repeat amniocentesis had a karyotype of 47,XX,+22[12]/46,XX[8]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a maternal origin of the extra chromosome 22. The pregnancy was terminated, and a 256-g female fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism and median facial cleft. Cytogenetic analysis of the skin fibroblasts revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+22[33]/46,XX[7].

CONCLUSION

Fetuses with high level mosaicism for trisomy 22 at amniocentesis may present IUGR, facial cleft and oligohydramnios on prenatal ultrasound.

Detection of fetal trisomy 9 mosaicism by noninvasive prenatal testing through maternal plasma DNA sequencing

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used as a powerful screening tool to detect common aneuploidies. However, its application for detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities remains inconclusive.

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 0) requested NIPT as a primary screening test for fetal aneuploidies at 13 weeks and 1 day of gestation. An unexpected Trisomy 9 (T9) abnormality was highly suspected. Amniocentesis was arranged for further diagnosis at 18 weeks of gestation. Final karyotyping reported 47,XX,+9 [18]/46,XX [12], indicating 60% T9 mosaicism.

CONCLUSION

This case shows strong evidence that NIPT can be a powerful screening tool to detect rare fetal trisomies at very early gestation.

Higher male prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism detected by amniocentesis

OBJECTIVE

To present the calculated frequencies, male to female sex-ratio, and modes of ascertainments in different levels of chromosomal mosaicism (CM) detected at amniocentesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This's a 10-years retrospective study between January 2008 and December 2017 and there were 13,752 cases of amniocentesis performed in MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Eight hundred and thirty four cases of CM were collected in this study. We reviewed their types of chromosomal abnormalities of mosaicism, the modes of ascertainment (including: advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, abnormal maternal serum screening result, and other reasons), maternal age, gestational age at amniocentesis, fetal gender, and perinatal findings. After amniocentesis, in situ culture was performed and the results of karyotype with CM were divided in to three levels.

RESULTS

In our sample of 13,752 amniocentesis, 834 cases with all levels of CM were collected in this study. Of them, there were 562 cases (4.09%) with level I mosaicism, 207 cases (1.51%) of level II mosaicism, and 65 cases (0.47%) of level III mosaicism (Table 1). In the group of advanced of maternal age (AMA), their calculated frequencies, 4.18% in level I, 1.46% in level II and 0.41% in level III, were very similar to those in total cases (p value = 0.206) without statistical significance. In the group of abnormal ultrasound findings, the calculated frequency was much higher in level III (0.87%), however, there was no statistical significance because of the small numbers of level III. In our cases of amniocentesis, the case numbers of male case (50.20%) is very similar to female (49.80%), and the male to female ratio was 1.01. But, we found more cases of male with CM (444 cases) than female (390 cases). The sex-ratio in different levels' calculated frequencies of CM showed similar in level I, and male prevalence was found in level II and III with statistical significance (p value = 0.022). The male prevalence also revealed in both numerical and structural abnormalities in level II and level III, but no difference in the cases of level I.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our observation showed a novel finding of higher male prevalence of CM in level II and III, and both in numerical and structural abnormalities. It's consistent with the theory of better survival in male embryo after partial self-correction of initial chromosomal aberrations, male-specific selection against chromosomal abnormalities.

Pregnancy outcome of autosomal aneuploidies other than common trisomies detected by noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to report the incidence and pregnancy outcome of autosomal aneuploidies other than common trisomies 21, 18, and 13 detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a single center.

METHODS

Pregnant women undergoing NIPT from February 2015 to January 2018 in our center were offered expanded screening to include rare autosomal aneuploidies. Aneuploidies included extra copy chromosomes (most likely trisomies) and decreased copy chromosomes (most likely monosomies). The pregnancy outcomes of women consenting to the expanded NIPT screen were recorded.

RESULTS

Expanded NIPT was performed in 15 362 pregnancies. A total of 59 autosomal aneuploidies other than the 3 common trisomies were detected, with a positive screening rate of 0.38% (59/15 362). The screen positive rate was higher in women aged above 35 years than in those younger (0.44% vs 0.32%, P < .05). Of the screen positive results, 30.5% (18/59) were because of extra copies for chromosomes trisomy 7, 10.2% (6/59) for chromosome 22, and 8.5% (5/59) for chromosomes 8 and 16 respectively, while other choromosomes were less frequently involved. Decreased copy chromosomes were less common: 6.8% (4/59) for chromosomes 14 and 13. Mixed aneuploidies with increased copies for some chromosomes and decreased copies for others were also noted. Invasive prenatal diagnosis was performed in 61% (36/59) of the cases. Invasive test results and clinical follow-ups demonstrated that most (94.9%, 56/59) of the rare aneuploidies were false positives, probably resulting from confined placental mosaicism. Only 1 case (1.7%, 1/59) with NIPT report of extra copies of chromosome 7 and without ultrasound evidence of fetal abnormality was confirmed to be fetal mosaicism by microarray test. Uniparental disomy of whole chromosome 2 was identified by microarray analysis in 1 case with extra copy chromosome 2 detected by NIPT. Loss of heterozygocity of chromosome 7q11.23-q21.11 was detected in another case with extra copy chromosome 7. Fortunately, pregnancy outcomes of both cases were normal. Two fetal deaths attributed to severe fetal growth restriction were associated with extra copies of chromosome 16 at expanded NIPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Autosomal aneuploidies other than trisomies 21, 18, and 13 are not uncommon in routine clinical NIPT practice. Extra copies of chromosomes in rare cases can be associated with uniparental disomy. Most rare aneuploidies at NIPT have good pregnancy outcomes. Thus, invasive testing should be used with caution for these aneuploidies in routine clinical practice.