Microencapsulated rhEGF to facilitate epithelial healing and prevent scar formation of cesarean wound: A randomized controlled trial

Advances and applications of biomimetic biomaterials for endogenous skin regeneration

Endogenous regeneration is becoming an increasingly important strategy for wound healing as it facilitates skin's own regenerative potential for self-healing, thereby avoiding the risks of immune rejection and exogenous infection. However, currently applied biomaterials for inducing endogenous skin regeneration are simplistic in their structure and function, lacking the ability to accurately mimic the intricate tissue structure and regulate the disordered microenvironment. Novel biomimetic biomaterials with precise structure, chemical composition, and biophysical properties offer a promising avenue for achieving perfect endogenous skin regeneration. Here, we outline the recent advances in biomimetic materials induced endogenous skin regeneration from the aspects of structural and functional mimicry, physiological process regulation, and biophysical property design. Furthermore, novel techniques including in situ reprograming, flexible electronic skin, artificial intelligence, single-cell sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics, which have potential to contribute to the development of biomimetic biomaterials are highlighted. Finally, the prospects and challenges of further research and application of biomimetic biomaterials are discussed. This review provides reference to address the clinical problems of rapid and high-quality skin regeneration.

Experimental Study of Ultra-Pulsed CO 2 Fractional Laser Combined With Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Gel in the Treatment of Eyelid Keloid

OBJECTIVE

Keloid (KD) and hypertrophic scars are prevalent and result from excessive growth of dermal tissue after skin damage. This review focused on the clinical application of the ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rHEGF) gel in patients with eyelid KD.

METHODS

Patients (N = 98) with KD who underwent surgery were randomly divided into a study group (ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel therapy, N = 49) and a control group (ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser therapy, N = 49). Besides, 5 cases dropped out of the study, including 2 cases in the study group and 3 cases in the control group. Finally, 47 cases of the study group and 46 cases of the study group were included in the analysis. The clinical baseline data such as sex, age, body mass index, scar area, etiology, Vancouver Scar Scale score, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, four-item itch questionnaire score, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α level expression were recorded in the study group (N = 47) and the control group (N = 46).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, scar area, etiology, Vancouver Scar Scale score, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, 4-item itch questionnaire score, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels between the patients treated with ultra-pulse CO 2 fractional laser + rHEGF gel and those only treated with ultra-pulse CO 2 fractional laser ( p > 0.05). Vancouver Scar Scale scores, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores, and four-item itch questionnaire scores of patients with eyelid KD decreased to a greater extent than those treated with ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel ( p <0.01). Compared with ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser treatment, ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel was more efficacious in treating patients with eyelid KD, with a lower incidence of adverse effects and a 1-year recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel can significantly improve the scar status and scar itching in patients with eyelid KD, with an obvious therapeutic effect, a low incidence of adverse effects, a 1-year recurrence rate, and high safety, which is worthy of popularization and application.

EGF, a veteran of wound healing: highlights on its mode of action, clinical applications with focus on wound treatment, and recent drug delivery strategies

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been used in wound management and regenerative medicine since the late 1980s. It has been widely utilized for a long time and still is because of its excellent tolerability and efficacy. EGF has many applications in tissue engineering, cancer therapy, lung diseases, gastric ulcers, and wound healing. Nevertheless, its in vivo and during storage stability is a primary concern. This review focuses on the topical use of EGF, especially in chronic wound healing, the emerging use of biomaterials to deliver it, and future research possibilities. To successfully deliver EGF to wounds, a delivery system that is proteolytically resistant and stable over the long term is required. Biomaterials are an area of interest for the development of such systems. These systems may be used in non-healing wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, and burns. In these pathologies, EGF can reduce the risk of amputation of the lower extremities, as it accelerates the wound healing process. Furthermore, appropriate delivery system would also stabilize and control the EGF release profile in a wound. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have already proven the efficacy of such systems in the above-mentioned types of wounds. Moreover, several formulations such as ointments and intralesional injections are already available on the market. However, these products are still problematic in terms of inadequate diffusion of EGF, low bioavailability storage conditions, and shelf-life. This review discusses the nano formulations comprising biomaterials infused with EGF which could be a promising delivery system for chronic wound healing in the future.

The use of epidermal growth factor in dermatological practice

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a growth factor that plays a pivotal role in wound healing and maintaining tissue homeostasis by regulating cell survival, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Exogenous administration of bioidentical human recombinant epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) has been known to promote skin wound healing, although rhEGF is increasingly being used in drug delivery systems and nanotechnology. However, despite considerable attention being focused on the potential clinical applications of rhEGF in several dermatological conditions beyond wound healing, the number of studies still remains relatively low. Herein, we conducted a literature search of PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar databases to retrieve published literature related to rhEGF and summarised the effects of rhEGF in the treatment of various wound types, radiotherapy or chemotherapy-related skin reactions, atopic dermatitis, skin aging, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Trial of labor after cesarean section

Fourth, before shared decision making with pregnant women, the exact benefits and risks of both TOLAC and ERCD should be fully and thorough in discussion. A speedy recovery, the enjoying self-control natural birth, immediately entering into a bonding with their newborns and breastfeeding faster of mothers and avoidance of C/S related morbidity, such as intrauterine adhesion, pelvic adhesion, the risk of subsequent pregnancy (placenta accreta spectrum), and postpartum hemorrhage are reported to encourage women favor the TOLAC; and by contrast, for ERCD, the possible advantages include easily controlling labor pain, avoidance of vaginal or pelvic floor damage with subsequent development of sequela, such as stress urinary incontinence, lower genito-urinary tract dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse etc., and the ease of a scheduled birth and following postpartum care [5,6,9,19-21].

Efficacy of Human-Recombinant Epidermal Growth Factor Combined with Povidone-Iodine for Pressure Ulcers and Its Influence on Inflammatory Cytokines

Purpose

To determine the clinical efficacy of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rh-EGF) combined with povidone-iodine (PVI) on patients with pressure ulcers (PUs).

Methods

One hundred and five PU patients treated between January 2018 and January 2021 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. Of them, 50 patients who received conventional treatment were assigned to the control group (Con group), while 55 patients treated with rh-EGF combined with PVI were assigned to the observation group (Obs group). The two groups were compared in clinical efficacy, PU alleviation (total area reduction rate, total depth reduction rate, and total volume reduction rate), healing time, pain degree (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score), inflammatory indexes (interleukin-8 [IL-8], tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], and hypersensitive C reactive protein [hs-CRP]), and hydroxyproline content in the wound.

Results

The Obs group yielded a higher total effective rate than the Con group (P < 0.05). The Obs group also experienced statistically shorter healing time and milder pain, with better PU alleviation and lower levels of inflammation indexes compared with the Con group (all P < 0.05). In addition, a higher hydroxyproline content in the wound was found in the Obs group.

Conclusions

All in all, rh-EGF combined with PVI has a definite curative effect on patients with PUs. It can promote PU alleviation and hydroxyproline secretion in the wound and inhibit pain and inflammatory reactions, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Analysis of clinical trials on biomaterial and therapeutic applications of chitosan: A review

Chitosan is a modified natural carbohydrate polymer derived from chitin that occurs in many natural sources. It has a diverse range of applications in medical and pharmaceutical sciences. Its primary and permitted use is biomaterial in medical devices. Chitosan and its derivatives also find utility in pharmaceuticals as an excipient, drug carrier, or therapeutic agent. The USFDA has approved chitosan usage as a biomaterial but not for pharmaceutical use, primarily because of the concerns over its source, purity, and immunogenicity. A large number of clinical studies are underway on chitosan-based materials/ products because of their diverse applications. Herein, we analyze clinical studies to understand their clinical usage portfolio. Our analysis shows that >100 clinical studies are underway to investigate the safety/efficacy of chitosan or its biomaterials/ nanoparticles, comprising ~95% interventional and ~ 5% observational studies. The regulatory considerations that limit the use of chitosan in pharmaceuticals are also deliberated. TEASER: Clinical Trials of Chitosan.