Changing Paradigms in ITP Management: Newer Tools for an Old Disease

Novel treatments for immune thrombocytopenia: targeting platelet autoantibodies

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by low platelets and an increased risk of bleeding. Platelet autoantibodies target major platelet glycoproteins and cause Fc-mediated platelet destruction in the spleen and reticuloendothelial systems. As mechanisms of disease, platelet autoantibodies are important therapeutic targets. Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonists are a new class of therapeutics that reduce the half-life of immunoglobulin G including pathogenic platelet autoantibodies. Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors interfere with Fc-mediated platelet clearance. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors reduce antibody production. The efficacy of these targeted therapies provides new support for the role of platelet autoantibodies in pathogenesis of ITP even these antibodies can be difficult to detect.

AREAS COVERED

This review includes an in-depth exploration of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITP, focusing on autoantibodies. Treatments outlined in this review include a) FcRn antagonists, b) complement inhibitors, c) B-cell directed therapies such as BTK inhibitors, and anti-BAFF agents, d) Syk inhibitors, e) plasma-cell directed therapies, and f) novel cellular therapeutic products.

EXPERT OPINION

Platelet autoantibodies are often elusive in ITP, yet novel treatments targeting this pathway reinforce their role in the pathogenesis of this autoimmune platelet disorder.

2025 update on clinical trials in immune thrombocytopenia

Although the development and regulatory approval of the thrombopoietin receptor agonists revolutionized aspects of the immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment landscape over the past two decades, there remain many areas of high unmet need. Therefore, a number of investigational and repurposed agents are currently undergoing clinical development in ITP. In a departure from historical trials, which largely focused on the indefinite treatment of persistent or chronic ITP, ongoing trials run the gamut of disease phases, and include novel agents being evaluated in early phases of the disease to attempt to modify the disease course. Many agents in development target disease pathophysiologic mechanisms not previously targeted by agents in current use, including platelet autoantibody recycling, B-cell maturation and differentiation, long-lived plasma cells, and the complement system, among others. These agents represent promising treatment options for patients with otherwise refractory disease or who are intolerant of currently available therapies. Additionally, with our increasing understanding of the diverse immune mechanisms at play in ITP, the expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium to include agents targeting diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms may allow a more personalized therapeutic selection in the future. This manuscript provides an up-to-date, in-depth overview of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials in ITP.

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Cost Analysis of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Spain between 2014 and 2020: A Population-based Study

Background  Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterised by low platelet counts and often leads to bleeding, fatigue, and reduced health-related quality of life. Methods  This observational, retrospective, population-based study using BIG-PAC® database included Spanish paediatric and adult patients with primary ITP diagnosed in primary care and hospitals between 2014 and 2020 (median follow-up: 4 years). Epidemiology, baseline/clinical characteristics, treatment trends, healthcare resources and costs were analysed. Results  The BIG-PAC® database contains records of 1,818,588 patients; 170 adults and 27 children with ITP were included in our analysis. ITP prevalence and annual incidence per 100,000 were estimated in 10.8 (2.8 in chronic ITP [cITP] patients) and 1.5 (0.3 in cITP patients), respectively. Epistaxis was the most common bleeding event, followed by genitourinary and gastrointestinal bleeding; >50%/> 75% of ITP/cITP patients reported fatigue. Chronic patients had lower platelet counts at baseline and required more transfusions. Corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists were the most used agents in first-, second- and third-line treatment, respectively. Thirty-five patients, all of them in chronic phase, underwent splenectomy. Patients had on average 13.9, 6.6, and 1.2 visits/year to primary care, haematology/internal medicine, and emergency departments, respectively. More than one-fourth of adult patients took on average 16.3 days of sick leave annually. Mean annual total health care costs were €10,741 (ITP patients) and €19,809 (cITP patients). Conclusion  This is the first study to provide an overall perspective on the situation of the Spanish ITP population in terms of epidemiology, treatment trends, health care resources and costs, highlighting unmet patient needs, and direct and indirect costs/resource use between 2014 and 2020.

Red blood cell distribution width is a useful biomarker to predict bleeding and thrombosis risks in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Bleeding and thrombosis are common complications during immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) treatment. There is a strong need to predict bleeding and thrombosis risks before ITP treatment to optimize therapy and appropriately manage these complications. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 120 patients with primary ITP to identify a biomarker to predict bleeding and thrombosis. We compared blood test results at diagnosis between patients with and without bleeding or thrombosis episodes. The standard deviation of red blood cell distribution width (RDW-SD) differed significantly between those with and without bleeding and between those with and without thrombosis, leading us to identify it as a variable representative of risk. RDW-SD was significantly associated with patient age and with histories of several vascular diseases. Multivariate regression analyses showed that RDW integrated several variables associated with vascular risks. RDW-SD was significantly associated with difficulty with corticosteroid discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.22, p = 0.01), incidence of bleeding (HR, 2.75, p< 0.01), incidence of thrombosis (HR, 2.67, p< 0.01) and incidence of infection (HR, 1.78, p = 0.04). The RDW-SD value at the time of ITP diagnosis is a useful biomarker to predict the risks of bleeding, thrombosis, and other complications.

Avatrombopag for adults with early versus chronic immune thrombocytopenia

Avatrombopag is a newer thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) currently approved to treat chronic ITP (duration >12 months). No studies have yet evaluated the safety and effectiveness of avatrombopag in newly diagnosed ITP (duration <3 months) or persistent ITP (duration 3-12 months), and so its use in these populations is presently off-label worldwide. We hypothesize that avatrombopag has similar safety and effectiveness irrespective of ITP disease phase. To evaluate this, we performed a multicenter observational cohort study of adults with ITP treated with avatrombopag, comparing patient outcomes by disease phase (newly diagnosed/persistent versus chronic). Seventy-five patients were included, 23 with newly diagnosed/persistent ITP (17.7 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment) and 52 with chronic ITP (65.3 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment). On avatrombopag, 91% of newly diagnosed/persistent patients versus 96% of chronic patients (p = .58) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /L) and 86% versus 81% of patients (p = .78) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /L). Median platelet counts on avatrombopag were similar between the two groups (165 × 109 /L vs. 129 × 109 /L, p = .57). Response durability was high and similar in both groups. No patients in the newly diagnosed/persistent group had a major bleeding event, thromboembolic event or avatrombopag discontinuation for adverse events, compared with 4, 1, and 2, respectively, in the chronic group. Thrombocytosis (platelets ≥400 × 109 /L) incidence was similar in the two groups. No other drug-related adverse events occurred in either group. Avatrombopag was safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed and persistent ITP, with outcomes numerically, statistically, and clinically similar to patients receiving avatrombopag for chronic ITP.

Novel therapeutics and future directions for refractory immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder affecting approximately 1 in 20 000 people. While most patients with ITP are successfully managed with the current set of standard and approved therapeutics, patients who cannot be adequately managed with these therapies, considered to have refractory ITP, are not uncommon. Therefore, there remains an ongoing need for novel therapeutics and drug development in ITP. Several agents exploiting novel targets and mechanisms in ITP are presently under clinical development, with trials primarily recruiting heavily pretreated patients and those with otherwise refractory disease. Such agents include the neonatal Fc receptor antagonist efgartigimod, the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor rilzabrutinib, the complement inhibitors sutimlimab and iptacopan and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and mezagitamab, among others. Each of these agents exploits therapeutic targets or other aspects of ITP pathophysiology currently not targeted by the existing approved agents (thrombopoietin receptor agonists and fostamatinib). This manuscript offers an in-depth review of the current available data for novel therapeutics in ITP presently undergoing phase 2 or 3 studies in patients with heavily pretreated or refractory ITP. It additionally highlights the future directions for drug development in refractory ITP, including discussion of innovative clinical trial designs, health-related quality of life as an indispensable clinical trial end-point and balancing potential toxicities of drugs with their potential benefits in a bleeding disorder in which few patients suffer life-threatening bleeding.

Is splenectomy a good strategy for refractory immune thrombocytopenia in adults?

Rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have profoundly changed the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) over the last 20 years. Even if most current guidelines put splenectomy, rituximab and TPO-RAs on the same treatment level, most clinicians and patients clearly prefer to postpone splenectomy and to multiply the lines of medical treatment before considering surgery. The management of ITP refractory to rituximab and TPO-RAs is challenging. Splenectomy is currently performed much less frequently because of a better knowledge of its complications, particularly severe late infections and deep vein thrombosis, and the inability to reliably predict its effectiveness. Furthermore, there is a reluctance to propose splenectomy when other treatments have been ineffective, based on the not well-documented risk that splenectomy could not be effective in such a case. The objective of this update was to review the most recent published data on the long-term tolerability and side effects of splenectomy and the predictors of response and efficacy, especially for patients exposed to multiple medical lines. This update can help physicians and patients with failure of multiple lines of therapy make an informed decision on the indication for splenectomy with the help of up-to-date data.