Analysis of differential gene expression in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to sensitizers and irritants

Reduced specificity for the local lymph node assay for lipophilic chemicals: Implications for the validation of new approach methods for skin sensitization

Meaningful and accurate reference data are crucial for the validation of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in toxicology. For skin sensitization, multiple reference datasets are available including human patch test data, guinea pig data and data from the mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA). When assessed against the LLNA, a reduced sensitivity has been reported for in vitro and in chemico assays for lipophilic chemicals with a LogP ≥3.5, resulting in reliability restrictions within the h-CLAT OECD test guideline. Here we address the question of whether LLNA data are an appropriate reference for chemicals in this physicochemical range. Analysis of LLNA vs human reference data indicates that the false-discovery rate of the LLNA is significantly higher for chemicals with LogP ≥3.5. We present a mechanistic hypothesis whereby irritation caused by testing lipophilic chemicals at high test doses leads to unspecific cell proliferation. The accompanying analysis indicates that for lipophilic chemicals with negative calls in in vitro and in chemico assays, resorting to the LLNA is not necessarily a better option. These results indicate that the validation of NAMs in this particular LogP range should be based on a more holistic evaluation of the reference data and not solely upon LLNA data.

Novel gene markers of immunosuppressive chemicals in mouse lymph node assay

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an immunologically based test of the sensitizing potential of immunotoxicants, but also evaluates immunosuppressive potential with good sensitivity and specificity. We conducted the LLNA with calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporin A), antimetabolites (methotrexate and azathioprine), steroids (dexamethasone and prednisolone), and an alkylator (cyclophosphamide). We performed a comprehensive analysis of results of gene expression in lymph nodes obtained in the LLNA using a highly sensitive DNA chip, 3D-Gene™, and the quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Zfp459 expression increased in all animals treated with immunosuppressive chemicals. Ltf, Cbll1 and Lias expression changed specifically in response to the calcineurin inhibitors, Fmo2 and 9630033F20Rik in response to the antimetabolites, Krt8, Gjb1, Hmha1 and Sfrs7 in response to the steroids, and Gbp1 and Mup5 in response to the alkylator. Therefore, these genes were considered novel markers for immunosuppression and their expression could be used to evaluate the mechanism of action of immunosuppressive chemicals.

The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers

With the tight deadlines set both by the public and by the regulatory authorities to replace animal tests for toxicological endpoints relevant to the development of cosmetic products, a large number of research projects have recently focused on cellular endpoints affected by skin sensitizing compounds. The general aim stated in these projects was to find "markers" for skin sensitizers, be it at the level of the transcriptome or at the protein level. Rather than talking of "cellular markers," the new paradigm "Toxicity testing in the 21st century" formulated by the National Academy of Sciences in the United States focuses on "Toxicity pathways." A specific marker for any given toxicological endpoint can only exist, if specific toxicity pathways, comprising specific sensors, are linked to this endpoint. In the context of skin sensitization, one has to ask whether there is an innate cellular signaling pathway activated by skin sensitizers. Here a significant body of evidence, mainly accumulated in the last 20 months, is reviewed, indicating that indeed the Nrf2-Keap1-ARE regulatory pathway is such a toxicity pathway activated by cysteine-reactive skin sensitizers. Whereas first indications on the in vivo relevance are available, key questions remain open and can now specifically be addressed. A minority of sensitizers, more specifically reacting with lysine residues, appears not to activate the Nrf2-Keap1-ARE pathway and might trigger yet another unknown toxicity pathway.

Gene expression profiles and pathways in skin inflammation induced by three different sensitizers and an irritant

It is often difficult to discriminate between chemically induced skin irritation and sensitization due to their similar clinical, pathological, and immunological responses. More information than that currently available from local lymph node assays (LLNAs), such as data from gene expression and pathway analysis, can provide more insightful data than the assay itself for distinguishing skin sensitization from skin irritation. This study investigated the gene expression profiles and pathways in ear skins of mice topically exposed daily for three consecutive days to the known strong contact sensitizer 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, the skin contact sensitizer 2-phenyl-4-ethoxymethylene-5-oxazolone, the skin or respiratory sensitizer toluene 2,4-diisocyanate, or to the non-sensitizing irritant croton oil. All the sensitizers induced histological changes in ear tissues similar to those induced by the croton oil. In gene expression microarrays, sensitizers up-regulated 193 genes and down-regulated 61 genes in ear skin following chemical exposure. 13 genes whose expression was affected by more than two-fold by all three of the sensitizers, but not by the irritant, were selected by microarray analysis. Microarray and real-time RT-PCR analyses revealed that, of these genes, the allergic inflammation-related genes Oasl2 and Zbp1 were up-regulated in skin inflammation by the sensitizers. In gene expression pathway analysis of all the sensitizers and the croton oil, the top functions of the 48 genes were related to cytokine and cytokine receptors interactions, and only two genes (Cxcl9 and Cxcl10) were specific to skin sensitizer-induced skin inflammation. Thus, although contact sensitizer-induced skin inflammation is similar to irritant-induced responses in terms of histological changes and gene expression profiles, the regulation of allergic inflammation-related gene transcripts, such as those of Oasl2 and Zbp1 or Cxcl9 and Cxcl10, could help to discriminate skin sensitization from chemically induced skin inflammation.

Intracellular expression of cytokines and granzyme B in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to irritants and sensitizers

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been extensively utilized to evaluate sensitizing chemicals. However, there have been some concerns that its use to discriminate between classes of chemicals is minimal. It is thus desirable to identify better or alternative immune endpoints with in LLNA itself. Here, we evaluated the protein and/or mRNA levels of cytokines and granzyme B (GzmB), a cytotoxic lymphocyte product, to discriminate between sensitizers and irritants and to characterize the chemical sensitizers when used as supplemental indicators in LLNA endpoints. For this, CBA/N mice were topically treated daily with a well-known chemical sensitizer such as a strong contact sensitizer 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB), a skin contact sensitizer 2-phenyl-4-ethoxymethylene-5-oxazolone (OXA), and a skin or respiratory sensitizer toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI), and the non-sensitizing irritants, croton oil (CRO) and nonanoic acid (NA), for 3 consecutive days. The protein and/or mRNA levels in auricular lymph nodes draining the ear skin were then analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and immunoassay. The sensitizers, but not the irritants, evoked pronounced interleukin (IL)-2, IL-3 and IL-4 or interferon (IFN)-gamma. Significantly, different sensitizers evoked different cytokine patterns of IL-4 and IFN-gamma, as DNCB strongly up-regulated both IFN-gamma and IL-4, OXA up-regulated IFN-gamma strongly but IL-4 weakly, and TDI up-regulated IL-4 strongly but IFN-gamma weakly. The sensitizers also strongly up-regulated GzmB mRNA, while the irritants had a much weaker effect. Thus, these cytokines and GzmB mRNA may be useful as additional endpoints for discriminating between irritants and sensitizers or contact and respiratory sensitizers in the LLNA.