Refinement of the ECETOC approach to identify endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals in ecotoxicology

Endocrine disruption assessment in aquatic vertebrates - Identification of substance-induced thyroid-mediated effect patterns

According to the World Health Organisation and European Commission definitions, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they show adverse effects, have endocrine activity and the adverse effects are a consequence of the endocrine activity (using a weight-of-evidence approach based on biological plausibility), unless the adverse effects are not relevant to humans or non-target organisms at the (sub)population level. To date, there is no decision logic on how to establish endocrine disruption via the thyroid modality in non-mammalian vertebrates. This paper describes an evidence-based decision logic compliant with the integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) concept, to identify thyroid-mediated effect patterns in aquatic vertebrates using amphibians as relevant models for thyroid disruption assessment. The decision logic includes existing test guidelines and methods and proposes detailed considerations on how to select relevant assays and interpret the findings. If the mammalian dataset used as the starting point indicates no thyroid concern, the Xenopus Eleutheroembryonic Thyroid Assay allows checking out thyroid-mediated activity in non-mammalian vertebrates, whereas the Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay or its extended, fixed termination stage variant inform on both thyroid-mediated activity and potentially population-relevant adversity. In evaluating findings, the response patterns of all assay endpoints are considered, including the direction of changes. Thyroid-mediated effect patterns identified at the individual level in the amphibian tests are followed by mode-of-action and population relevance assessments. Finally, all data are considered in an overarching weight-of-evidence evaluation. The logic has been designed generically and can be adapted, e.g. to accommodate fish tests once available for thyroid disruption assessments. It also ensures that all scientifically relevant information is considered, and that animal testing is minimised. The proposed decision logic can be included in regulatory assessments to facilitate the conclusion on whether substances meet the endocrine disruptor definition for the thyroid modality in non-mammalian vertebrates.

Interpretation of sexual secondary characteristics (SSCs) in regulatory testing for endocrine activity in fish

Secondary sexual characteristics (SSCs) are important features that have evolved in many fish species because of inter-individual competition for mates. SSCs are crucial not only for sexual selection, but also for other components of the reproductive process and parental care. Externally, they are especially clear in males (for instance, tubercles, fatpad, anal finnage, colouration) but are also externally present in the females (for instance, ovipositor). These characters are under hormonal control and as such there has been much interest in incorporating them as measures in fish test methods to assess the potential endocrine activity of chemicals. Here we describe the external SSCs in typical laboratory test species for endocrine testing - fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), zebrafish (Danio rerio) and the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). We also provide some examples and discuss the utility of SSC responses to the endocrine activity of chemicals in the field and the laboratory. This paper is not aimed to provide a comprehensive review of SSCs in fish but presents a view on the assessment of SSCs in regulatory testing. Due to the current regulatory importance of establishing an endocrine mode-of-action for chemicals, we also consider other, non-endocrine factors that may lead to SSC responses in fish. We conclude with recommendations for how the assessment of SSCs in fish could be usefully incorporated into the endocrine hazard and risk assessment of chemicals.

Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances

A SETAC Pellston Workshop® "Environmental Hazard and Risk Assessment Approaches for Endocrine-Active Substances (EHRA)" was held in February 2016 in Pensacola, Florida, USA. The primary objective of the workshop was to provide advice, based on current scientific understanding, to regulators and policy makers; the aim being to make considered, informed decisions on whether to select an ecotoxicological hazard- or a risk-based approach for regulating a given endocrine-disrupting substance (EDS) under review. The workshop additionally considered recent developments in the identification of EDS. Case studies were undertaken on 6 endocrine-active substances (EAS-not necessarily proven EDS, but substances known to interact directly with the endocrine system) that are representative of a range of perturbations of the endocrine system and considered to be data rich in relevant information at multiple biological levels of organization for 1 or more ecologically relevant taxa. The substances selected were 17α-ethinylestradiol, perchlorate, propiconazole, 17β-trenbolone, tributyltin, and vinclozolin. The 6 case studies were not comprehensive safety evaluations but provided foundations for clarifying key issues and procedures that should be considered when assessing the ecotoxicological hazards and risks of EAS and EDS. The workshop also highlighted areas of scientific uncertainty, and made specific recommendations for research and methods-development to resolve some of the identified issues. The present paper provides broad guidance for scientists in regulatory authorities, industry, and academia on issues likely to arise during the ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment of EAS and EDS. The primary conclusion of this paper, and of the SETAC Pellston Workshop on which it is based, is that if data on environmental exposure, effects on sensitive species and life-stages, delayed effects, and effects at low concentrations are robust, initiating environmental risk assessment of EDS is scientifically sound and sufficiently reliable and protective of the environment. In the absence of such data, assessment on the basis of hazard is scientifically justified until such time as relevant new information is available. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:267-279. © 2017 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).