Preoperative T Staging of Potentially Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison between Free-Breathing Radial VIBE and Breath-Hold Cartesian VIBE, with Histopathological Correlation

How to update esophageal masses imaging using literature review (MRI and CT features)

MRI offers new opportunities for detailed visualization of the different layers of the esophageal wall, as well as early detection and accurate characterization of esophageal lesions. Staging of esophageal tumors including extramural extent of disease, and status of the adjacent organ can also be performed by MRI with higher accuracy compared to other imaging modalities including CT and esophageal endoscopy. Although MDCT appears to be the primary imaging modality that is indicated for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer to assess tumor resectability, MDCT is considered less accurate in T staging. This review aims to update radiologists about emerging imaging techniques and the imaging features of various esophageal masses, emphasizing the imaging features that differentiate between esophageal masses, demonstrating the critical role of MRI in esophageal masses. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI features may help differentiate mucosal high-grade neoplasia from early invasive squamous cell cancer of the esophagus, also esophageal GISTs from leiomyomas, and esophageal malignant melanoma has typical MR features. KEY POINTS: MRI can accurately visualize different layers of the esophagus potentially has a role in T staging. MR may accurately delineate esophageal fistulae, especially small mediastinal fistulae. MRI features of various esophageal masses are helpful in the differentiation.

Deep learning prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invasion depth from arterial phase enhanced CT images: a binary classification approach

BACKGROUND

Precise prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invasion depth is crucial not only for optimizing treatment plans but also for reducing the need for invasive procedures, consequently lowering complications and costs. Despite this, current techniques, which can be invasive and costly, struggle with achieving the necessary precision, highlighting a pressing need for more effective, non-invasive alternatives.

METHOD

We developed ResoLSTM-Depth, a deep learning model to distinguish ESCC stages T1-T2 from T3-T4. It integrates ResNet-18 and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, leveraging their strengths in spatial and sequential data processing. This method uses arterial phase CT scans from ESCC patients. The dataset was meticulously segmented by an experienced radiologist for effective training and validation.

RESULTS

Upon performing five-fold cross-validation, the ResoLSTM-Depth model exhibited commendable performance with an accuracy of 0.857, an AUC of 0.901, a sensitivity of 0.884, and a specificity of 0.828. These results were superior to the ResNet-18 model alone, where the average accuracy is 0.824 and the AUC is 0.879. Attention maps further highlighted influential features for depth prediction, enhancing model interpretability.

CONCLUSION

ResoLSTM-Depth is a promising tool for ESCC invasion depth prediction. It offers potential for improvement in the staging and therapeutic planning of ESCC.

Evaluation of optimal monoenergetic images acquired by dual-energy CT in the diagnosis of T staging of thoracic esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to objectively and subjectively assess optimal monoenergetic image (MEI (+)) characteristics from dual-energy CT (DECT) and the diagnostic performance for the T staging in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with histopathologically confirmed EC who underwent DECT from September 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled. One standard polyenergetic image (PEI) and five MEI (+) were reconstructed. Two readers independently assessed the lesion conspicuity subjectively and calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of EC. Two readers independently assessed the T stage on the optimal MEI (+) and PEI subjectively. Multiple quantitative parameters were measured to assess the diagnostic performance to identify T1-2 from T3-4 in EC patients.

RESULTS

The study included 68 patients. Subjectively, primary tumor delineation received the highest ratings in MEI (+) _40 keV of the venous phase. Objectively, MEI (+) images showed significantly higher SNR compared with PEI (p < 0.05), peaking at MEI (+) _40 keV in the venous phase. CNR of tumor (MEI (+) _{40 keV -80 keV}) was all significantly higher than PEI in arterial and venous phases (p < 0.05), peaking at MEI (+) _40 keV in venous phases. The agreement between MEI (+) _40 keV and pathologic T categories was 81.63% (40/49). Rho values in venous phases had excellent diagnostic efficiency for identifying T1-2 from T3-4 (AUC = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

MEI (+) reconstructions at low keV in the venous phase improved the assessment of lesion conspicuity and also have great potential for preoperative assessment of T staging in patients with EC.

Aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer: comparing diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT

OBJECTIVES

To compare between the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT for aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

We prospectively included patients with pathologically confirmed EC from November 2018 to June 2021, who had baseline stage of T3-4N0-2M0 and restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and MRI of the thorax. Two independent blinded radiologists scored image quality and the presence of invasion. Agreements between the two readers were calculated using kappa test. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predict value (PPV), and negative predict value (NPV) of MRI and CT in evaluating invasion were calculated. The net reclassification index (NRI) was used to evaluate the change in the number of patients correctly classified by MRI and CT.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (64.8 ± 9.0 years; 53 men) were enrolled. Inter-reader agreements of image quality scores and presence of invasion by MRI and CT between the two readers were almost perfect (kappa > 0.80). The accuracy of MRI in evaluating thoracic aorta invasion was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 90.0% vs. 71.4%; reader 2: 92.9% vs. 70.0%, respectively), and the accuracy of MRI in evaluating tracheobronchial invasion also was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 92.9% vs. 72.9%; reader 2: 95.7% vs. 70.0%, respectively). NRI values were positive in both the evaluation of aorta and tracheobronchial invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of 3-T MRI in determining thoracic aorta and tracheobronchial invasion is significantly higher than that of CT.

KEY POINTS

• 3.0-T MRI was significantly more accurate than CT in assessing invasion of the thoracic aorta in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI was also significantly more accurate than CT in assessing tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI has a higher diagnostic performance than CT in evaluating patients with suspected aortic or tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed.

Results

For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUV_max, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth more frequent cancer worldwide, with a poor prognosis. Initial staging is critical to decide on the best individual treatment approach. Current modalities for the assessment of EC are irradiating techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT, or invasive techniques, such as digestive endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive and non-irradiating imaging technique that provides high degrees of soft tissue contrast, with good depiction of the esophageal wall and the esophagogastric junction. Various sequences of MRI have shown good performance in initial tumor and lymph node staging in EC. Diffusion-weighted MRI has also demonstrated capabilities in the evaluation of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy. To date, there is not enough data to consider whole body MRI as a routine investigation for the detection of initial metastases or for prediction of distant recurrence. This narrative review summarizes the current knowledge on MRI for the management of EC.

Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Although CT, endoscopic US, and PET are critical in determining the appropriate management of esophageal carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma), previous reports show that staging accuracy remains low, particularly for nodal involvement sensitivity. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of MRI for multiple staging thresholds in patients with biopsy-proven esophageal carcinoma (differentiation of stage T0 disease from stage T1 or higher disease, differentiation of stage T2 or lower disease from stage T3 or higher disease, and differentiation of stage N0 disease from stage N1 or higher disease [where T refers to tumor stage and N refers to nodal stage]). Materials and Methods Studies of the diagnostic performance of MRI in determining the stage of esophageal carcinoma in patients before esophagectomy and pathologic staging between 2000 and 2019 were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library by a librarian and radiation oncologist. Pooled diagnostic performance of MRI was calculated with a bivariate random effects model. Bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool. Results Twenty studies with a total of 984 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled accuracy for stage T0 versus stage T1 or higher had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 82, 96) and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 51, 81). Pooled accuracy for stage T2 or lower versus stage T3 or higher had a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 76, 92) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 75, 93). Pooled accuracy for stage N0 versus stage N1 or higher had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 60, 80) and a specificity of 72% (95% CI: 64, 79). The concern for applicability was low for the patient selection, index test, and reference test domains, except for 10% of studies (two of 20) that had unclear concern for patient selection applicability. Conclusion MRI has high sensitivity but low specificity for the detection of esophageal carcinoma, which shows promise for determining neoadjuvant therapy response and for detecting locally advanced disease for potential trimodality therapy. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Leeflang in this issue.

Imaging Assessment of Visceral Pleural Surface Invasion by Lung Cancer: Comparison of CT and Contrast-Enhanced Radial T1-Weighted Gradient Echo 3-Tesla MRI

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced radial T1-weighted gradient-echo 3-tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the detection of visceral pleural surface invasion (VPSI). Visceral pleural invasion by non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be classified into two types: PL1 (without VPSI), invasion of the elastic layer of the visceral pleura without reaching the visceral pleural surface, and PL2 (with VPSI), full invasion of the visceral pleura.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-three patients with pathologically confirmed VPSI by NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Multidetector CT and contrast-enhanced 3T MRI with a free-breathing radial three-dimensional fat-suppressed volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) pulse sequence were compared in terms of the length of contact, angle of mass margin, and arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio. Supplemental evaluation of the tumor-pleura interface (smooth versus irregular) could only be performed with MRI (not discernible on CT).

Results

At the tumor-pleura interface, radial VIBE MRI revealed a smooth margin in 20 of 21 patients without VPSI and an irregular margin in 10 of 12 patients with VPSI, yielding an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F-score for VPSI detection of 91%, 83%, 95%, 91%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. The McNemar test and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed no significant differences between the diagnostic accuracies of CT and MRI for evaluating the contact length, angle of mass margin, or arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio as predictors of VPSI.

Conclusion

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced radial T1-weighted gradient-echo 3T MRI and CT were equal in terms of the contact length, angle of mass margin, and arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio. The advantage of MRI is its clear depiction of the tumor-pleura interface margin, facilitating VPSI detection.

Role of Multimodality Imaging in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Its Complications, with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition and impairs the quality of life for millions of patients, accounts for considerable health care spending, and is a primary risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There have been substantial advances in understanding the pathogenesis of GERD and its complications and much progress in diagnosis and management of GERD; however, these have not been comprehensively discussed in the recent radiology literature. Understanding the role of imaging in GERD and its complications is important to aid in multidisciplinary treatment of GERD. GERD results from prolonged or recurrent reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Common symptoms include heartburn or regurgitation. Prolonged reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus can cause erosive esophagitis. Over time, the inflammatory response related to esophagitis can lead to deposition of fibrous tissue and development of strictures. Alternatively, the esophageal mucosa can undergo metaplasia (Barrett esophagus), a precursor to dysplasia (which can lead to adenocarcinoma). Conventional barium esophagography has long been considered the primary imaging modality for the esophagus, and the fluoroscopic findings for diagnosis of GERD have been well established. Multimodality imaging has a clear role in detection and assessment of the complications of GERD, specifically reflux esophagitis and Barrett esophagus; differentiation of benign and malignant strictures; and detection, staging, and posttreatment surveillance of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dramatic changes in utilization of abdominal imaging during the past 2 decades, with significantly declining volume of fluoroscopic procedures and concomitant increase in CT and MRI studies, it is crucial that modern radiologists appreciate the value of barium esophagography in the workup of GERD and recognize the key imaging features of GERD and its complications at CT and MRI.

Free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

To test the performance of free-breathing Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) using a radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for quantitative solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) assessment.

METHODS

A total of 67 SPN cases receiving routine MRI routine scans, DWI, and dynamic-enhanced MRI in our hospital from May 2017 to November 2018 were collected. These cases were divided into a malignant group and a benign group according to the characteristics of the SPNs. The quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (K^trans, K_ep, V_e) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the nodules were measured.

RESULTS

The K^trans and K_ep values in the malignant group were higher than those in the benign group, while the ADC values in the malignant group were lower than those in the benign group. Furthermore, the K^trans value of adenocarcinoma was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma (P < 0.05). The V_e value was significantly different between non-small cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma (P < 0.05). With an ADC value of 0.98 × 10^-3 mm²/s as the threshold, the specificity and sensitivity to diagnose benign and malignant nodules was 90.6% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

High-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI using the r-VIBE technique in combination with DWI could contribute to pulmonary nodule analysis and possibly serve as a potential alternative to distinguish malignant from benign nodules as well as differentiate different types of malignancies.

A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

Background

Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) undergo endoscopic ultrasound and CT based cancer staging. Recent technical developments allow improved MRI quality with diminished motion artifact that may allow MRI to compare favorable to CT for noninvasive staging. Hence the purpose of the study was to assess image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI versus CT and EUS for preoperative T-staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer.

Methods

Between October-2014 and December-2017, esophageal cancer patients with T-staging by EUS were enrolled in this prospective study. Post-operative histopathologic T-staging was the reference standard. All participants underwent MRI [T2- multi-shot turbo spin echo sequence (msTSE), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and 3D gradient-echo based sequence (3D-GRE)] and CT [non-contrast and multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scanning] 5.6 + 3.6 days after endoscopy. Surgery was performed within 3.6 + 3.5 days after imaging. Two blinded endoscopists (reader 1 and 2) and radiologists (reader 3 and 4) independently evaluated EUS and CT/MRI, respectively. Considering the clinical relevance, patients were dichotomized into early (T1 and T2) vs late (T3 and T4) stage cancer before assessment. For statistical purpose, the binary decision was defined as the ability of the imaging technique to diagnose early stage/not early stage esophageal cancer. Diagnostic performance of EUS, MRI and CT was compared using McNemar’s test with Bonferroni correction; kappa values were assessed for reader performance.

Results

74 study participants (60 ± 8 yrs.; 56 men) with esophageal cancer were evaluated, of whom 85%(63/74) had squamous cell carcinoma, 61%(45/74) were at early stage and 39%(29/74) were at late stage cancer, as determined by histopathology. Intra- and Inter-reader agreement for pre-operative vs post-operative T-staging was excellent for all imaging modalities. Compared to CT, MRI showed significantly higher accuracy for both the readers (reader3: 96% vs 82%, p = 0.0038, reader4: 95% vs 80%, p = 0.0076, for MRI vs CT, respectively). Further, MRI outperformed EUS with higher specificity (reader 1 vs 3: 59% vs 93%, p = 0.0015, reader 2 vs 4: 66% vs 93%, p = 0.0081, for EUS vs MRI respectively), and accuracy (reader 1 vs 3: 81% vs 96%, p = 0.0022, reader 2 vs 4: 85% vs 95%, p = 0.057, for EUS vs MRI, respectively).

Conclusion

For resectable esophageal cancer, MRI had better diagnostic performance for tumor staging compared to CT and EUS.

Trial registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR-DOD, Registered 2nd October 2014, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9620

A pilot study of native T1-mapping for focal pulmonary lesions in 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: size estimation and differential diagnosis

Background

To investigate the accuracy of size estimation and potential diagnosis efficacy of native T1-mapping in focal pulmonary lesion, compared to T1-star 3D-volumetric interpolated breath-hold sequence (VIBE), T2-fBLADE turbo-spin echo (TSE), and computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with CT-detected focal pulmonary lesions underwent thoracic 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using axial free-breathing 3D T1-star VIBE, respiratory triggered T2-fBLADE TSE, breath-hold T1-Turbo fast low angle shot (FLASH) and T1-FLASH 3D. Native T1-mapping images were generated by T1-FLASH 3D with B1-filed correction by T1-Turbo FLASH. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate intra-observer agreement and inter-method reliability of diameter measurements. Native T1-values were measured and compared among the malignancy, tuberculosis, non-tuberculosis benign groups using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Forty-five focal pulmonary lesions were displayed by CT, native T1-mapping, T1-star VIBE, and T2-fBLADE TSE. T1-mapping-based diameter measurements yielded an intra-observer ICC of 0.995. Additionally, inter-method measurements were highly consistent (T1-mapping & T1-star VIBE: ICC 0.982, T1-mapping & T2-fBLADE TSE: ICC 0.978, T1-mapping & CT: ICC 0.972). For lesions <3.00 cm, T1-mapping intra-observer (ICC 0.982) and inter-method diameter measurements were also highly consistent (T1-mapping & CT: ICC 0.823). Native T1-values of malignant tumors were lower than those of the non-tuberculosis benign lesions (P=0.003). Native T1-values of tuberculosis were lower than those of the non-tuberculosis benign lesions (P=0.002). Native T1-values showed no statistically significant differences between malignant tumors and tuberculosis (P=0.059).

Conclusions

Native T1-mapping enable accurate and reliable diameter measurement. Native T1-values potentially differentiate malignant tumors or tuberculosis from non-tuberculosis benign lesions.

Combination of free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with diffusion weighted images: Potential for differentiating malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses

OBJECTIVES

High resolution CT is the most commonly used radiological method for differentiating benign from malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses, however, some of them are not easily diagnosed by morphology alone. Furthermore, due to the radiation dose, it is unsuitable for patients with disorders requiring repeated examinations over prolonged periods. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether a combination of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, radial VIBE) sequence can enable discrimination between benign from malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both chest CT scan and MR imaging with radial VIBE and DWI were obtained from 47 patients; 30 males and 17 females (mean age 64 years old; age range 48-83 years old). Benign and malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses were conclusively identified by pathology results. Two radiologists independently reviewed all the images and record radiological features including morphological signs on radial VIBE, CT images, and ADC value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to analyze the capability of radial VIBE as well as DWI to distinguish malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses.

RESULTS

In 77% of patients, malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses were found. Morphological signs of mediastinal lymph node enlargement and lobulation were more easily found in malignant masses in both radial VIBE (mediastinal lymph node enlargement: p = 0.033, lobulation: p = 0.039) and CT (mediastinal lymph node enlargement: p = 0.004, lobulation: p = 0.012). The ADC value were also significant difference between benign and malignant groups (p = 0.001). Combined ADC value with radial VIBE was a most specific test than routine-dose CT (86.1% vs 75%, p < 0.001), but less sensitive than routine-dose CT (81.8% vs 90.9%; p < 0.001) for malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses detection. Diagnostic accuracy was 89% for combining ADC value with radial VIBE, and 85% for routine-dose CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of morphological signs and ADC value seems to improve differentiating malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses. Especially in patients unable to endure radiation exposure, suspend respiration, radial VIBE provides similar morphological signs displaying to those on routine-dose CT.