Haploidentical stem cell transplantation: T cell depleted and repleted

The role of early natural killer cell adoptive infusion before engraftment in protecting against human herpesvirus-6B encephalitis after naïve T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Naïve T-cell-depleted grafts have been employed as an ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) platform to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and improve immune reconstitution by providing rapid donor memory T-cell reconstitution after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). CD45RA^- memory T cells confer protection against viruses such as cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and adenovirus; however, reports have shown an unexpectedly high incidence of human herpesvirus (HHV)-6B encephalitis among pediatric allo-HSCT patients.

METHODS

We report the first 18 consecutive allo-HSCT, 16 haplo-HSCT, and two human leukocyte antigen-matched related donors implanted with naïve TCD grafts. All donors were administered three cell products: first, a CD34⁺ stem cell product; second, a CD45RA⁺ TCD graft, followed by an adoptive natural killer (NK) cell infusion within 10 days after HSCT. The study's primary endpoint was the incidence of HHV-6B encephalitis.

RESULTS

Engraftment was achieved in 94.5% of cases; 2-year overall survival, event-free survival, and GvHD/relapse-free survival were 87.2% (95% CI 78.6-95.8), 67.3% (95% CI 53.1-81.5), and 64% (95% CI 50.5-78.1), respectively. HHV-6B reactivation occurred in 7 of the haplo-HSCT patients, six of who received a cell infusion with an NK/CD4 ratio <2. None of the patients developed encephalitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical study, we show that early adoptive NK cell infusion after a 45RA⁺ TCD allo-HSCT graft is safe and can prevent HHV-6B encephalitis. We recommend infusing adoptive NK cells after allo-HSCT using CD45RA⁺ TCD grafts.

Cancer Biology, Epidemiology, and Treatment in the 21st Century: Current Status and Future Challenges From a Biomedical Perspective

Since the second half of the 20th century, our knowledge about the biology of cancer has made extraordinary progress. Today, we understand cancer at the genomic and epigenomic levels, and we have identified the cell that starts neoplastic transformation and characterized the mechanisms for the invasion of other tissues. This knowledge has allowed novel drugs to be designed that act on specific molecular targets, the immune system to be trained and manipulated to increase its efficiency, and ever more effective therapeutic strategies to be developed. Nevertheless, we are still far from winning the war against cancer, and thus biomedical research in oncology must continue to be a global priority. Likewise, there is a need to reduce unequal access to medical services and improve prevention programs, especially in countries with a low human development index.