High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Versus Immunoassay for the Measurement of Sirolimus: Comparison of Two Methods

Comparison of LC-MS/MS and EMIT methods for the precise determination of blood sirolimus in children with vascular anomalies

Sirolimus (SRL) is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. The whole blood concentration of SRL is routinely monitored to tailor dosage and prevent toxicity. Currently, the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) is often applied to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of SRL, but the cross-reactivity with various metabolites is of great concern. A more specific method is required, such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, no study on the method comparison of the EMIT and LC-MS/MS for the measurement of whole blood SRL concentration in children with vascular anomalies has been reported. This study developed a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of SRL. Meanwhile, consistency between LC-MS/MS and the EMIT was evaluated by linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis. Whole blood samples were deproteinized with methanol for erythrocyte lysis, and the resulting solution was injected into the LC-MS/MS system using the positive electrospray ionization mode. The multiple reaction monitoring transitions of m/z 931.7 → 864.6 and m/z 934.7 → 864.6 were used for SRL and SRL-d3 as the internal standards, respectively. The analytes were separated on a C18 column with a gradient mobile phase (0.1 mM formic acid and 0.05 mM ammonium acetate in methanol/ultrapure water). Blood samples collected from children with vascular anomalies undergoing SRL therapy were tested by EMIT and by LC-MS/MS. The linear range of LC-MS/MS was 0.500–50.0 ng/ml and that of the EMIT was 3.50–30.0 ng/ml. A significant positive correlation between the two assays was established with a regression equation described as [EMIT] = 1.281 × [LC−MS/MS] + 2.450 (r = 0.8361). Bland–Altman plots showed a mean concentration overestimation of 4.7 ng/ml [95% CI: (−3.1, 12.6)] and a positive bias of 63.1% [95% CI: (−36.1, 162.3)] generated by the EMIT more than that of by LC-MS/MS. In conclusion, the two methods were closely correlated, indicating that switching between the two methods is feasible. Considering the overestimation nature of the EMIT assay, switching from the EMIT to the LC-MS/MS method deserves close attention and necessary re-evaluation for the target therapeutic reference range, may be required when methods are switched within the same clinical laboratory or results are compared between different laboratories.

Antineoplastic drugs and their analysis: a state of the art review

We provide an overview of the analytical methods available for the quantification of antineoplastic drugs in pharmaceutical formulations, biological and environmental samples.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation

Finding the balance between clinical efficacy and toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs is a challenge in renal transplantation (RTx), but especially in pediatric RTx patients. Due to the expected longer life-span of pediatric transplant patients and the long-term consequences of drug-induced infectious, malignant and cardiovascular adverse effects, protocols which minimize immunosuppressive therapy make conceptual sense. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring is a tool which provides support for the individualization of therapy. It has, however, limitations, and specific data in the pediatric cohort are comparatively sparse. There is large heterogeneity among the studies conducted to date in terms of methods, follow-up, endpoints, immunosuppressive regimens and patients. In addition, data from adult studies are not readily transferrable to the pediatric situation. This educational review gives a concise overview on aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric RTx.

Determination of vancomycin trough level in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with acute community-acquired meningitis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Penetration and concentration of vancomycin is still an elusive and complex issue particularly in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF). The aim of this study was to clarify the penetration of this antimicrobial agent in CSF during meningeal inflammation.

METHODS

In a prospective study, adult patients, with clinical and CSF analysis compatible with acute meningitis, who received vancomycin (15 mg/kg loading and 30 mg/kg daily maintenance dose) with ceftriaxone (4 gr/daily) were enrolled. CSF analysis including vancomycin trough levels before the fourth maintenance dose and during the 8-10th days of treatment, and simultaneous serum levels were performed by High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (18 men, 9 women; mean age of 39.4 ± 14.7) were enrolled. The first serum trough level of vancomycin was 13.82 ± 1.28 mg/l. The mean of corresponding trough level in CSF was 11.2 ± 1.41 mg/l. The serum and CSF trough levels revealed positive linear correlation (r: 0.60) and was significant at the 0.01 level (P: 0.004). The penetration CSF/serum ratio was 0.811 ± 0.082 (coefficient of variation: 10.1%). The second trough levels of serum and CSF in (14 patients) vancomycin were 13.32 ± 1.02 and 10.64 ± 1.21, respectively. The serum and CSF trough levels revealed positive linear correlation (r: 0.71). The serum and CSF concentrations revealed no variation compared to the first trough levels.

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin has appropriate concentration in CSF during the treatment of meningitis and do not decrease along with the alleviation of meningeal inflammation in spite of concerns in this regard.

Long-term evaluation of analytical methods used in sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring

Results of therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus blood concentrations are assay and laboratory dependent. This study compared performance over time of the IMx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) as part of a proficiency testing scheme. Pooled samples from sirolimus-treated patients and whole-blood samples spiked with known quantities of sirolimus were assayed monthly between 2004 and 2012. When results of pooled patient samples were compared with LC/MS/MS, the MEIA assay showed an overall mean percent bias of -2.3% ± 11.2% that, although initially positive, became increasingly negative from 2007 through 2009. The CMIA, which replaced the MEIA assay, had a mean percent bias of 21.9% ± 12.3%, remaining stable from 2007 through 2012. Similarly, for spiked samples, the MEIA showed an increasingly negative bias over time vs. LC/MS/MS, whereas CMIA maintained a stable positive bias. Based on comparison of immunoassay measurements on individual patient samples, CMIA values were more than 25% higher than MEIA values. These results highlight the importance of continued proficiency testing and regular monitoring of sirolimus assay performance. Clinicians must be aware of the methodology used and adjust target levels accordingly to avoid potential effects on efficacy and toxicity.

Development and validation of an HPLC method for the analysis of sirolimus in drug products

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a simple, rapid and sensitive reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for quantification of sirolimus (SRL) in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

METHODS

The chromatographic system employs isocratic elution using a Knauer- C18, 5 mm, 4.6 × 150 mm. Mobile phase consisting of acetonitril and ammonium acetate buffer set at flow rate 1.5 ml/min. The analyte was detected and quantified at 278nm using ultraviolet detector. The method was validated as per ICH guidelines.

RESULTS

The standard curve was found to have a linear relationship (r(2) > 0.99) over the analytical range of 125-2000ng/ml. For all quality control (QC) standards in intraday and interday assay, accuracy and precision range were -0.96 to 6.30 and 0.86 to 13.74 respectively, demonstrating the precision and accuracy over the analytical range. Samples were stable during preparation and analysis procedure.

CONCLUSION

Therefore the rapid and sensitive developed method can be used for the routine analysis of sirolimus such as dissolution and stability assays of pre- and post-marketed dosage forms.

Sirolimus in pediatric renal transplantation

SRL, an mTOR inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression, represents an important alternative to CNIs, which are still the cornerstones of pediatric solid organ tx. Because there are still limited data on SRL use among pediatric solid organ recipients, further studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of SRL. It has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics concerning dosing intervals and reduction of the dose in combination with other immunosuppressants. SRL also has antineoplastic, antiviral, and antiatherogenic advantages over other immunosuppressive agents. The adverse effects of SRL including thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, proteinuria, impaired wound healing, mouth ulcers, edema, male hypogonadism, TMA, and interstitial pneumonitis must be considered carefully in pediatric population. This article reviews the most recent data on SRL application in the field of pediatric renal tx.

Evaluation of the MassTrak Immunosuppressant XE Kit for the determination of everolimus and cyclosporin A in human whole blood employing isotopically labeled internal standards

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is widely used for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants given to transplant recipients. This study evaluated the performance of the newly introduced MassTrak Immunosuppressant XE Kit (Waters Corporation; “the Kit”) in the determination of everolimus and cyclosporin A (CsA) using LC-MS/MS.

The linearity, precision, detection limit, carryover and matrix effect of the Kit and comparison of the in-house method and Kit procedure were evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.

The Kit afforded good linearity in the measurement of everolimus from 2 to 26 ng/mL (R

The Kit employing isotopically labeled internal standards provides reliable measurements of immunosuppressant levels over a broad range of concentrations.

Evaluation of a fully automated method for the determination of sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrocyclic lactone, indicated for prevention of organ rejection after kidney transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring of this agent constitutes an important part to immunosuppressive treatment because of its narrow window of therapeutic efficacy. Routine methods include manual pretreatment of samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of an automated immunoassay that does not require manual pretreatment to quantify SRL in whole blood on the Dimension analyzer.

METHODS

We examined 50 whole blood samples collected routinely from kidney transplant patients treated with SRL. The samples were analyzed simultaneously by an immunoassay on an IMx analyzer (reference method), which requires manual pretreatment step versus a totally automated immunoassay on the Dimension analyzer, which does not require this pretreatment.

RESULTS

The Dimension SRL assay had a functional sensitivity of ≤2.4 ng/mL. Total imprecision was 15.6% at a concentration of 2.8 ng/mL; 10% at 7.9 ng/mL; and 5.2% at 18.4 ng/mL. Least-squares linear regression analysis yielded an r-value of 0.973 with the following equation: SRL-D=1.204*SRL-IMx-0.251. Bland-Altman comparison showed a mean positive difference of 1.38 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, -1.10 to 3.82), namely, 17.2% for SRL Dimension. The Dimension assay to monitor SRL concentrations was an acceptable method for routine clinical use, with total assay imprecision (%CV) ranging from 10.0% to 5.2% within and above the therapeutic concentration range, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SRL IMx and Sirolimus Dimension methods show a good correlation (r=0.973), but the SRL Dimension method demonstrated a positive average difference of 17.2% compared with the IMx method. The Dimension assay to monitor whole blood SRL concentration does not require a manual pretreatment step, reducing turnaround time and making this method an attractive alternative for SRL analysis.

Determination of blood sirolimus concentrations in liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor fluorescence polarization immunoassay: comparison with the microparticle enzyme immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method

BACKGROUND

Although high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the method of choice for blood sirolimus determination, the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) run on the IMx analyser is widely used in therapeutic monitoring of this immunosuppressant agent. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possible determination of sirolimus using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) commercialized for everolimus quantification.

METHODS

Sirolimus concentrations were determined in whole-blood samples from liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor Certican FPIA (Seradyn Inc.) run on a TDx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), Sirolimus MEIA run on an IMx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), and HPLC (UV detection) methods.

RESULTS

The Innofluor FPIA has a similar cross-reactivity with everolimus and sirolimus, and the within- and between-run coefficients of variation obtained for sirolimus determination were 2.7%-13.3%. In analysing different blood samples from liver and kidney transplant patients the linear regressions obtained were: FPIA = 1.12 HPLC + 0.43 (n=104, r=0.874), MEIA = 1.14 HPLC (n=146, r=0.892), and FPIA = 1.00 MEIA + 0.29 (n=106, r=0.941). Better correlation coefficients were obtained between the methods in the liver transplant samples (r>or=0.900) than in the kidney transplant samples (r>or=0.849). No significant effect was found for sirolimus clearance or the blood hematocrit on the relationship between the results produced by both immunoassays and HPLC.

CONCLUSION

The Innofluor FPIA is a valid alternative with an analogous performance to the MEIA for the therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus.

Immunoassay determination of rapamycin: reliability of the method with respect to liquid chromatography mass spectrometric quantification

Immunochemical assays represent a promising tool for quantification of immunosuppressants in organ transplanted patients, because they require small sample volumes and minimum sample pre-treatment; nevertheless considerations about method specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility cannot be overlooked. The present paper investigates the reliability of using the immunoparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for the quantification of blood rapamycin (RAPA) levels in therapeutic drug monitoring of renal transplanted patients with respect to a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (LC/ESI-MSMS) method, used as reference. Linearity of MEIA was tested over the range 0.0-30.0 ng/mL, with accuracy and precision within acceptable limits. Fifty-two blood samples were collected from 42 renal transplanted patients and analyzed simultaneously by both methods. The Pearson's regression analysis gave the following parameters: correlation equation [RAPA](MEIA) = 1.330 + 0.776 [RAPA](LC/ESI-MSMS), r = 0.8526, SD = 1.778, p < 0.0001. The obtained average rapamycin concentration was 8.8 +/- 3.4 ng/mL using MEIA and 9.6 +/- 3.7 ng/mL for LC/ESI-MSMS, with an overall underestimation of about 6% of the immunoenzymatic test. Accuracy of MEIA ranged from -33% to 36% with respect to the reference mass spectrometric method. Although immunoenzymatic test represents a fast and sufficiently accurate method for its use in clinical practice, specificity of the assay is still not sufficiently investigated and reference methods and/or Proficiency Testing Scheme should be used as external control.

Comparison of the CEDIA® and MEIA® assays for the measurement of sirolimus in organ transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated two immunoassays, the CEDIA assay and the MEIA assay, used for the measurement of whole blood levels of sirolimus in organ transplant recipients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We report on the performance characteristics (total precision, limit of quantitation (functional sensitivity), limit of detection (analytical sensitivity), linearity, accuracy) for each assay. Patient correlation studies were performed, and the results were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok analysis.

RESULTS

Total precision for the MEIA assay, corresponding to three mean concentrations of 5.0, 10.6 and 20.2 ng/mL, was 10.5, 8.5, and 6.7%, respectively. The limit of detection was determined to be 1.1 ng/mL and the limit of quantitation was 1.5 ng/mL. The mean recovery for CEDIA was 105.4%, and analysis of proficiency material demonstrated a large negative bias with respect to the mass spectrometry peer mean-later determined to be due to matrix interference. Results for the CEDIA assay showed a total precision, corresponding to a mean concentration of 5.4, 10.5 and 20.7 ng/mL, of 13.5, 5.6, and 4.1%, respectively. The limit of detection was found to be 4.8 ng/mL, with a limit of quantitation of 5.2 ng/mL. The mean recovery for MEIA was 110.1%, and analysis of proficiency material demonstrated good agreement with the mass spectrometry peer mean with a slight positive bias. Both assays were acceptably linear over the reportable range of the assay. Patient correlation studies demonstrated a positive average bias for both assays versus results from LC-MS measurement (0.9 ng/mL for MEIA, 2.1 ng/mL for CEDIA).

CONCLUSION

Based on this evaluation, the MEIA demonstrated acceptable performance for use in clinical monitoring of sirolimus. However, based on a higher limit of quantitation that falls within the therapeutic interval, the CEDIA is not recommended for clinical monitoring of sirolimus.

Simultaneous LC–MS–MS determination of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and sirolimus in whole blood as well as mycophenolic acid in plasma using common pretreatment procedure

The purpose of the study was to develop rapid and simple procedure for simultaneous determination of cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus (TCR), and sirolimus (SIR) in whole blood and mycophenolic acid (MPA) in plasma. Ascomycin (ASCO), cyclosporine D (CsD), and desmethoxysirolimus (DMSIR) were used as internal standards (IS) for TCR, CsA and MPA, and SIR, respectively. In the method development, six-level blood calibrators were used for CsA (range 47-1725 ng/ml), TCR (range 2.1-38.8 ng/ml), and SIR (range 2.4-39.6 ng/ml). Four-level calibrators were used for MPA (range 0.15-5.48 microg/ml). Four levels of quality control (QC) standards were used for blood samples, together with two levels of QC standards in plasma. All QC standards and calibrators were obtained from commercial sources. Sample preparation based on precipitation of 50 microl of sample in zinc sulfate-methanol-acetonitrile mixture containing IS, followed by centrifugation. HPLC was performed on ChromSpher pi column, 30 mm x 3 mm, in ballistic gradient of ammonium formate buffer-methanol at 0.8 ml flow rate. Following gradient elution profile was applied: 0-1.2 min at 30% methanol (divert valve to waste), 1.21-3.1 min 97% methanol (divert valve to detector), 3.11-3.7 min 30% methanol (divert valve to waste). ESI-MS-MS (MRM) was done on TSQ Quantum instrument with ESI source in positive ion mode. Ammoniated adducts of protonated molecules were used as precursor ions for all analytes but MPA. For this compound sodium adduct was used. Following transitions were monitored: for CsA m/z 1220-1203; for CsD 1234-1217; for SIR 931.6-864.5 and 882.6; for DMSIR 902-834.5; for TCR 821.5-768.5 and 785.5; for ASCO 809.5-756; for MPA 343-211.6; for MPA-glucuronide 514-306 and 211.6. The limits of quantitation were: 1 ng/ml for TCR and SIR, 20 ng/ml for CsA, and 0.1 microg/ml for MPA. Post-column infusion experiments showed that no positive or negative peaks appeared after injection of matrix in the elution range of target compounds. General signal suppression caused by matrix ranged from 20-40%, and was caused mainly by zinc sulfate present in deproteinizing solution. Extracted samples were stable for 2 days at 4 degrees C and for at least 20 days at -20 degrees C. MPA was fully separated from its glucuronide, which was eluted at around 0.7-0.8 min and directed to the waste. Some mutual cross-contribution of CsD and CsA was observed (below 1%), other IS did not contribute to target compounds and vice versa. Observations of chromatograms from patients taken single therapy demonstrated that possible metabolites of CsA, TCR, or SIR did not interfere with target compounds or IS.