Association of Emergence of HLA Antibody and Acute Rejection in Intestinal Transplant Recipients: A Possible Evidence of Acute Humoral Sensitization

Intestinal transplantation: Significance of immune responses

Intestinal allografts, with many resident immune cells and as a destination for circulating lymphocytes of the recipient, appear to be the most challenging solid organ transplants. The high incidence of acute rejection and frequent reports of fatal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after intestinal transplantation call for more research to describe the molecular mechanisms involved in the immunopathogenesis of post-transplant complications to define new therapeutic targets. In addition, according to the rapid development of immunosuppressive agents, it is time to consider novel therapeutic approaches in managing treatment-refractory patients with rejection or severe GvHD. Herein, the main immunological challenges before and after intestinal transplant including, brain-dead donor inflammation, acute rejection, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejections, as well as GvHD have been described. Besides, the new immune-based therapies used in experimental and clinical settings to improve tolerance toward intestinal allograft, and cases of operational tolerance have been reviewed.

B-Cell Induction Therapies in Intestinal Transplantation

Despite advancements in short-term outcomes since the inception of intestinal transplant, significant long-term graft failure persists. Early successes are attributed to the utilization of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy, coupled with T-cell modulating induction regimens, which effectively reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, the challenge of chronic allograft injury remains unresolved. There is increasing evidence indicating a correlation between donor-specific antibodies and the survival of visceral allografts. Strategies aimed at reducing the presence or load of these antibodies may potentially enhance long-term outcomes. Consequently, our focus is now turning toward B-cell induction therapies as a possible solution.

Immunosuppression Regimens for Intestinal Transplantation in Children

Pediatric intestinal transplant serves as the only definitive treatment for children with irreversible intestinal failure. Successful intestinal transplant hinges upon appropriate management of immunosuppression. The indications for intestinal transplant have changed over time. Immunosuppression regimens can be divided into induction and maintenance phases along with treatment of acute rejection. Intestinal transplant induction now often includes antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab in addition to corticosteroids. Maintenance regimens continue to be dominated by tacrolimus, with additional agents used to either decrease goal tacrolimus levels to limit toxicity or as an adjunct in sensitized patients. Careful monitoring can help to limit serious complications, such as rejection, infection, and malignancy. Future work will aim to decrease variation in practice and identify methods to determine optimal immunosuppression for a particular patient. Furthermore, there is a need for non-invasive monitoring of the intestinal graft and functional assessments of immunosuppression.

Grant monitoring after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review aims to describe in detail the most common practices utilized to monitor graft function in intestinal transplant (ITx) recipients. In addition, to discussing the role of endoscopy and stool studies it will examine the use of other potential biomarkers which have been utilized. Data will be discussed from contemporary publications in the field, the Intestinal Transplant Registry as well as detailed data from a large, ITx single-center.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant improvements have been made in early outcomes following ITx, yet long-term survival remains challenged by infection and rejection, both of which can present with diarrhea. While endoscopy and stool studies are the gold-standard for graft monitoring, calprotectin, citrulline, measurements of immunoreactivity and donor-specific antibodies have been investigated in the field and are herein reviewed.

SUMMARY

Despite a number of tests which are currently available for monitoring ITx recipients, a strong need exists for improved noninvasive, timely and accurate biomarkers to help improve ITx graft and patient survival.

Association of More Intensive Induction With Less Acute Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation: Results of 445 Consecutive Cases From a Single Center

BACKGROUND

In intestinal transplantation, acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a significant challenge to achieving long-term graft survival. It is still not clear which are the most important prognostic factors.

METHODS

We performed a Cox multivariable analysis of the hazard rates of developing any ACR, severe ACR, and cause-specific graft loss during the first 60 months posttransplant among 445 consecutive intestinal transplant recipients at our institution since 1994. Of particular interest was to determine the prognostic influence of induction type: rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 2 mg/kg × 5)/rituximab (150 mg/m × 1; begun in 2013), alemtuzumab (2001-2011), and less intensive forms.

RESULTS

First ACR and severe ACR occurred in 61.3% (273/445) and 22.2% (99/445) of cases. The following 3 multivariable predictors were associated with significantly lower hazard rates of developing ACR and severe ACR: transplant type modified multivisceral or full multivisceral (P = 0.0009 and P < 0.000001), rATG/rituximab induction (P < 0.000001 and P < 0.01), and alemtuzumab induction (P = 0.004 and P = 0.07). For both ACR and severe ACR, the protective effects of rATG/rituximab and alemtuzumab were highly significant (P ≤ 0.000005 for ACR; P ≤ 0.01 for severe ACR) but only during the first 24 days posttransplant (when the ACR hazard rate was at its peak). The prognostic effects of rATG/rituximab and alemtuzumab on ACR/severe ACR disappeared beyond 24 days posttransplant (ie, nonproportional hazards). While significant protective effects of both rATG/rituximab and alemtuzumab existed during the first 6 months posttransplant for the hazard rate of graft loss-due-to-rejection (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003), rATG/rituximab was additionally associated with a consistently lower hazard rate of graft loss-due-to-infection (P = 0.003). All significant effects remained after controlling for the propensity-to-be-transplanted since 2013.

CONCLUSIONS

More intensive induction was associated with a significant lowering of ACR risk, particularly during the early posttransplant period.

Long-term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single-center experience

There is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3-year follow-up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver-intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end-stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long-term survival.

Intestinal transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has now emerged as a lifesaving therapeutic option and standard of care for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. Improvement in survival over the years has justified expansion of the indications for intestinal transplantation beyond the original indications approved by Center for Medicare and Medicaid services. Management of patients with intestinal failure is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to accurately select candidates who would benefit from rehabilitation versus transplantation. Significant strides have been made in patient and graft survival with several advancements in the perioperative management through timely referral, improved patient selection, refinement in the surgical techniques and better understanding of the immunopathology of intestinal transplantation. The therapeutic efficacy of the procedure is well evident from continuous improvements in functional status, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. This current review summarizes various aspects including current practices and evidence based recommendations of intestinal transplantation.

Updates on acute and chronic rejection in small bowel and multivisceral allografts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The surgical management of short bowel syndrome now includes intestinal (ITx) and multivisceral transplantation (MVTx), which has advanced and is now a sustainable option for the treatment of intestinal failure. Improvements in immunosuppressive therapies, excellence in surgical and medical management and enhanced post-transplant monitoring have all contributed to optimizing this solid organ transplant as a means of supplanting the diseased native bowel and alimentary tract with a functional alternative.

RECENT FINDINGS

Post-transplant management is a critical and challenging phase of gastrointestinal transplantation, and the transplant pathologist is an essential member of the transplant team who identifies many of the early and late complications after ITx and MVTx. Among the most injurious and common complications of ITx and MVTx is acute rejection and, to a lesser degree, chronic rejection. Both of these broad categories of rejection are principally identified by histopathological changes in the allograft; however, biomarkers and other laboratory analytes are rapidly evolving into critical ancillary tools in identifying and further characterizing the rejection process. Thus, the transplant pathologist must also be able to utilize numerous other laboratory tests and panels of molecular biomarkers that provide supplementary information to accompany the biopsy interpretation and clinical suspicion of rejection.

SUMMARY

Using biopsies and an assortment of additional approaches, the transplant pathologist is now able to provide swift and detailed information regarding the rejection process in the gastrointestinal transplant. This enables the clinical team to properly and successfully intercede, contributing to enhanced patient and graft survival.

Clinical relevance of the de novo production of anti-HLA antibodies following intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Despite a negative pretransplant cross-match, intestinal transplant recipients can mount humoral immune responses soon after transplantation. Moreover, the development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with severe graft injury. Between June 2000 and August 2011, 30 patients (median age 37.6±9.8 years) received isolated intestinal transplantations (ITX, n=18) or multivisceral transplantations (MVTXs, n=12) at our center. We screened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies pre- and post-transplant. If patients produced DSAs, treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was initiated. In the event of DSA persistence and/or treatment-refractory rejection, rituximab and/or bortezomib were added. Ten patients developed DSAs and simultaneously showed significant signs of rejection. These patients received plasmapheresis and IVIG. Eight patients additionally received rituximab, and two patients were treated with bortezomib. DSA values decreased upon antirejection therapy in 8 of the 10 patients. The development of DSAs following ITX is often associated with acute rejection. We observed that the number of mismatched antigens and epitopes correlates with the probability of developing de novo DSAs. Early diagnosis and therapy, including B-cell depletion and plasma cell inhibition, are crucial to preventing further graft injury.

Impact of positive flow cytometry crossmatch on outcomes of intestinal/multivisceral transplantation: role anti-IL-2 receptor antibody

BACKGROUND

Positive crossmatch may be associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (AR) and worse overall outcomes after intestinal/multivisceral (MV) transplantation. However, the evidence from published studies in this setting is sparse and contradictory. This study reports the impact of positive flow cytometry crossmatch on clinical outcomes after intestinal/MV transplantation and the use of anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody as a maintenance immunosuppressant.

METHODS

Records of all intestinal/MV transplants from 2003 to 2010 were reviewed. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate T- and B-cell crossmatch status. Standard immunosuppression included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin-rituximab induction with tacrolimus and steroid maintenance. From 2008 onwards (second era), monthly anti-IL-2 receptor antibody was added to the maintenance immunosuppression in patients receiving liver-excluding transplants.

RESULTS

Of 131 intestinal/MV transplants, 27 (21%) had a positive crossmatch. Positive crossmatch was not associated with an increased incidence of AR and graft loss (30% and 37% vs. 29% and 47%; P=0.94 and 0.35, respectively). This effect was maintained in liver-excluding transplants. Overall rate of AR decreased from 39% to 22% in the second era. In liver-excluding transplants, there was a significant decrease in AR from 75% to 44% with the use of anti-IL-2 receptor antibody therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

With rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin-rituximab induction, positive crossmatch status is not associated with worse outcomes after intestinal/MV transplantation. Use of anti-IL-2 receptor antibody as a part of maintenance immunosuppression may be beneficial in liver-excluding transplants.

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results.

METHODS

With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

Successful isolated intestinal transplantation in sensitized recipients with the use of virtual crossmatching

We evaluated virtual crossmatching (VXM) for organ allocation and immunologic risk reduction in sensitized isolated intestinal transplantation recipients. All isolated intestine transplants performed at our institution from 2008 to 2011 were included in this study. Allograft allocation in sensitized recipients was based on the results of a VXM, in which the donor-specific antibody (DSA) was prospectively evaluated with the use of single-antigen assays. A total of 42 isolated intestine transplants (13 pediatric and 29 adult) were performed during this time period, with a median follow-up of 20 months (6-40 months). A sensitized (PRA ≥ 20%) group (n = 15) was compared to a control (PRA < 20%) group (n = 27) to evaluate the efficacy of VXM. With the use of VXM, 80% (12/15) of the sensitized patients were transplanted with a negative or weakly positive flow-cytometry crossmatch and 86.7% (13/15) with zero or only low-titer (≤ 1:16) DSA. Outcomes were comparable between sensitized and control recipients, including 1-year freedom from rejection (53.3% and 66.7% respectively, p = 0.367), 1-year patient survival (73.3% and 88.9% respectively, p = 0.197) and 1-year graft survival (66.7% and 85.2% respectively, p = 0.167). In conclusion, a VXM strategy to optimize organ allocation enables sensitized patients to successfully undergo isolated intestinal transplantation with acceptable short-term outcomes.

Immunologic challenges in small bowel transplantation

Since the introduction of tacrolimus, small-bowel and multivisceral transplantion has increased to 100-200/year in the United States. The intestine carries more passenger lymphocytes than other organs, and bidirectional trafficking of lymphocytes and other immunocytes begins as soon as the vascular clamp is released. Because of ischemia-reperfusion injury and exposure to ligands for Toll-like receptors from the lumen, the innate immune system of the graft is activated, causing inflammation which must be brought under control by regulatory cells. Inclusion of the liver in the allograft favors graft acceptance, but the mechanism of this effect has not been determined. Anti-HLA and other anti-donor antibodies clearly play a major role in determining the long-term fate of the graft, as reflected in 5-year graft survival. Development of new (de novo) HLA antibodies and/or increases in their titers or function-especially the ability to bind C1q and activate complement increase the risk of graft loss. Monitoring antidonor antibody production and the use of new therapies including complement inhibitors will contribute to increasing success of SBT.

The challenge of acute rejection in intestinal transplantation

Early diagnosis and treatment of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after intestinal transplantation (ITx) is challenging. We report the outcome of three patients: two presented mild ACR improved with steroids. One presented steroid-resistant severe rejection, improved after rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG), but unfortunately died for encephalitis caused by opportunistic infections.

Nonsurgical care of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients: a review for the intensivist

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure to the treatment of choice for patients with irreversible intestinal failure and serious complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Increased numbers of transplant recipients and improved survival rates have led to an increased prevalence of this patient population in intensive care units. Management of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients is uniquely challenging because of complications arising from the high incidence of transplant rejection and its treatment. Long-term comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney failure, and neurological sequelae, also develop in this patient population as survival improves. This article is intended for intensivists who provide care to critically ill recipients of intestinal and multivisceral transplants. As perioperative care of intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients has been described elsewhere, this review focuses on common nonsurgical complications with which one should be familiar in order to provide optimal care. The article is both a review of the current literature on multivisceral and isolated intestinal transplantation as well as a reflection of our own experience at the University of Miami.

Association between donor-specific antibodies and acute rejection and resolution in small bowel and multivisceral transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are associated with acute kidney graft rejection, but their role in small bowel/multivisceral allograft remains unclear. We carried out a prospective study to understand the impact of DSA in the setting of intestinal allograft rejection.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (15 grafts) were serially evaluated for DSA levels pre- and posttransplant. DSA was determined by Luminex and the results were interpreted as fluorescence intensity (FI), with FI more than 3000 considered positive.

RESULTS

The clinical rejection episodes in allografts were significantly associated with the presence of DSA (P=0.041).We obtained 291 biopsy samples from graft ileum and date-matched DSA assay reports. Sixty-three (21.65%) of the biopsies showed acute rejection. The appearance of DSA were preformed (n=5, anti-human leukocyte antigen class II=3, anti-class I and II=2), de novo (n=4, 15.25±4.72 days after transplantation, anti-class II=1, and anti-class I and II=3) and never (n=6). Among the 63 biopsies, 30(47.6%) had significant correlations with positive DSA (kappa=0.30, P<0.001) and manifested severe rejection grade (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of small bowel/multivisceral transplantation patients, there was a high incidence of DSA. The presence of DSA should alert the clinical team of a higher risk of rejection, and reduction of the FI is clinically associated with resolution. Serial endoscopy guided biopsies combined with simultaneous DSA measurement in postintestinal transplantation follow-up is an effective means of screening for cellular and humoral-based forms of acute rejection.

Association of lymphocyte crossmatch and the outcome of intestinal transplantation in swine

BACKGROUND

The effect of preformed antidonor antibodies have been demonstrated in various types of solid organ transplantation. However, the significance of anti-donor antibodies in intestinal transplantation remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact that the extent of T cell crossmatch has on the outcome of swine intestinal transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All studies were performed on outbred domestic male pigs weighing from 15 to 20 kg. Intestinal transplantation was performed orthotopically with an exchange of grafts between white and black pigs. FK506 was administered intravenously (0.1 mg/kg per day, POD 0-7) for immunosuppression. A lymphocyte crossmatch test was performed using the direct CDC crossmatch. The results were considered positive when more than 10% of the donor lymphocytes were killed by the recipient's serum. In addition, 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-80 and 81-100% of the killed lymphocytes were classified as grade 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively.

RESULT

A total of 34 intestinal transplantations were performed. All but one case had positive donor specific T cell crossmatches. The number of grade 2, 4, 6 and 8 cases was 11, 14, 6 and 2, respectively. Although there was a tendency towards a decreased survival according to the grade, the survival rate was not statistically different among each different grade. Moreover, the rates of acute cellular rejection and vascular complications were not significantly different among the four grades.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the extent of positive T cell crossmatch is not associated with the outcome of swine intestinal transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation: current outcomes and opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights current outcomes in intestinal transplantation and summarizes advances that have recently occurred in five interrelated areas: progress in intestinal rehabilitation, immunologic and technical modifications, awareness of opportunities for improved allograft monitoring, and better assessment of long-term complications and morbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved long-term management of patients with intestinal failure as well as improved outcomes with intestine transplant are changing the previously established paradigms of timing for referral. For those requiring transplant, use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody induction protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1 and 5 year patient survival rates of 93 and 78%, respectively with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection or morbidities such as renal dysfunction. Descriptions of tissue, proteomic and genomic technologies to complement traditional methodologies to monitor graft function are emerging.

SUMMARY

Optimal timing for referral of children with intestinal failure and improved medical and surgical therapies increase the opportunity for intestinal adaptation without the need for transplant. For those undergoing transplant, technical and immunologic modifications, developments in graft monitoring, and reduction of long-term morbidities are leading to improved outcomes.

Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation

Irreversible intestinal failure in children is predominantly caused by surgical conditions such as volvulus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastroschisis. Functional intestinal failure from motility disorders such as intestinal pseudo-obstruction or enterocyte dysfunction with microvillus inclusion disease also may require intestine replacement. Approved indications for intestinal transplantation include liver dysfunction, loss of major venous access, frequent central line-related sepsis, and recurrent episodes of severe dehydration despite intravenous fluid management. Surgical options include transplantation of the isolated intestine, combined liver-intestine transplantation, or multivisceral transplantation of the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and small bowel (with or without the liver). Immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation is based on tacrolimus therapy, often with induction immunosuppression using antilymphocyte antibodies (eg, antithymocyte antibody and alemtuzumab). Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1- and 5-year patient survival rates of 95% and 77%, respectively, with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection.

Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection: from association to causation

Considerable research has established an association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. Two new major developments now provide evidence that this relationship is in fact causative. First, recent studies of serial serum samples of 346 kidney transplant patients from four transplant centers show that de novo antibodies, can be detected before rejection. Moreover, serial testing revealed that when antibodies were not present, 528 patient years of good function was demonstrable in 149 patients. Second, among 90 patients whose grafts chronically failed, 86% developed antibodies before failure. To assess the likelihood of a causal link, we applied the nine widely accepted Bradford Hill criteria and conclude that the evidence supports a causal connection between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. The clinical implication is significant because we hope this review will stimulate centers to begin the one remaining task of showing that antibody removal will indeed prevent chronic failure.

Evaluation of c4d deposition and circulating antibody in small bowel transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) consensus criteria are defined in kidney and heart transplantation by histological changes, circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA), and C4d deposition in affected tissue. AMR consensus criteria are not yet identified in small bowel transplantation (SBTx). We investigated those three criteria in 12 children undergoing SBTx, including one retransplantation and four combined liver-SBTx (SBTx), with a follow-up of 12 days to 2 years. All biopsies (91) were evaluated with a standardized grading scheme for acute rejection (AR), vascular lesions and C4d expression. Sera were obtained at day 0 and during the follow-up. C4d was expressed in 37% of biopsies with or without AR, but in 50% of biopsies with severe vascular lesions. In addition, vascular lesions were always associated with AR and a poor outcome. All children with AR (grade 2 or 3) observed before the third month died or lost the graft. DSA were never found in any studied sera. We found no evidence that C4d deposition was of any clinical relevance to the outcome of SBTx. However, the grading of vascular lesions may constitute a useful marker to identify AR that is potentially resistant to standard treatment, and for which an alternative therapy should be considered.

Analysis of acute cellular rejection episodes in recipients of primary intestinal transplantation: a single center, 11-year experience

Intestinal transplantation has evolved over the years with major improvements in patient and graft survival. Acute cellular rejection of the intestine, however, still remains one of the most challenging aspects of postoperative management. We analyzed retrospectively collected data from 209 recipients of primary intestinal grafts at our institution over the past 11 years. A total of 290 episodes of biopsy-proven rejection requiring clinical treatment were analyzed. Rejection episodes doubled in length, on average, with each increasing grade (mild, moderate, severe). We observed increased incidence of overall rejection and particularly severe rejection in recipients of isolated intestinal and liver-intestine grafts in comparison with multivisceral grafts. Two rejection history variables had a significant negative impact on graft survival: the occurrence of a severe rejection episode and a rejection episode lasting >or=21 days. The lower incidence rate of severe rejection in recipients of multivisceral grafts might be due to a combination of increased donor lymphatic tissue and larger load of donor-derived immune competent cells present in the graft. The development of more effective monitoring and treatment protocols to prevent the occurrence of severe and/or lengthy rejection episodes is of critical importance for intestinal graft survival.

Small intestine transplantation today

INTRODUCTION

Intestinal transplantation has become a life-saving therapy in patients with irreversible loss of intestinal function and complications of total parenteral nutrition.

DISCUSSION

The patient and graft survival rates have improved over the last years, especially after the introduction of tacrolimus and rapamycin. However, intestinal transplantation is more challenging than other types of solid organ transplantation due to its large amount of immune competent cells and its colonization with microorganisms. Moreover, intestinal transplantation is still a low volume procedure with a small number of transplanted patients especially in Germany. A current matter of concern is the late referral of intestinal transplant candidates.

CONCLUSION

Thus, patients often present after onset of life-threatening complications or advanced cholestatic liver disease. Earlier timing of referral for candidacy might result in further improvement of this technique in the near future.