Value of Soluble CD30 in Liver Transplantation

The role of CD30 and CD153 (CD30L) in the anti-mycobacterial immune response

The establishment of a protective T-cell response against mycobacterial infections involves different co-stimulatory molecules and their respective ligands. Among these molecules the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Super-family (TNFRSF) and the Tumor Necrosis Factor Super-family (TNFSF) are known to be important members. This review analyzes the evidence that CD30 and CD153 (CD30L), members of the TNFRSF and TNSF, play key roles in the T cell-dependent anti-mycobacterial immune response. Mice deficient in either CD30 or CD153, or treated with antibodies blocking the effects or CD30 and CD153, and infected with M.avium or M.bovis BCG exhibit higher bacterial burden, abnormal inflammatory responses with decreased Th1 responses, this is evidenced by the reduced number of IFN-γ-producing cells. Recent evidence also showed that CD30⁺ CD153⁺ Tγδ cells participate in the early stages of M.bovis BCG infection by producing IL-17A. In humans, stimulation of T-cells with mycobacterial antigens induces CD30 expression mainly by CD4⁺ cells; CD30⁺ cells have been demonstrated in tissues of patients with tuberculosis (TB) and in positive tuberculin skin test reactions. In addition, the levels of soluble CD30 are increased in serum and BAL of TB patients and these levels seems to correlate with the severity of the disease. These findings suggest that CD30/CD153 interactions during the anti-mycobacterial immune response are important for the establishment and maintenance of a protective response. Further studies would be required to determine whether these molecules may be good clinical biomarkers or potential targets for immune manipulation.

Soluble CD30 does not predict late acute rejection or safe tapering of immunosuppression in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous reports revealed the potential value of the soluble CD30 level (sCD30) as biomarker for the risk of acute rejection and graft failure after renal transplantation, here we examined its use for the prediction of safe tapering of calcineurin inhibitors as well as late acute rejection.

METHODS

In a cohort of renal transplant patients receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy we examined whether sCD30 can be used as a marker for safe (rejection-free) discontinuation of tacrolimus at six months after transplantation (TDS cohort: 24 rejectors and 44 non-rejecting controls). Also, in a second cohort of patients (n=22, rejectors n=11 and non-rejectors n=11), participating in a clinical trial of rituximab as induction therapy after renal transplantation (RITS cohort), we examined whether sCD30 could predict the occurrence of late (>3months post-transplant) acute rejection episodes. sCD30 was measured by ELISA in serum taken before and at several time points after transplantation.

RESULTS

Overall, in the TDS cohort sCD30 decreased after transplantation. No difference in sCD30 was observed between rejectors and non-rejecting controls at any of the time points measured. In addition, in the RITS cohort, sCD30 measured at three months after transplantation were not indicative for the occurrence of late acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

In two prospectively followed cohorts of renal transplant patients we found no association between sCD30 and the occurrence of either late acute rejection or acute rejection after reduction of immunosuppression.

Clinical operational tolerance in liver transplantation: state-of-the-art perspective and future prospects

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the definite treatment for end-stage liver diseases with satisfactory results. However, untoward effects of life-long immunosuppression prevent the development of alternative strategies to achieve better long-term outcome. Achieving clinical operational tolerance is the ultimate goal.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed and Google Scholar search using terms: "immune tolerance", "liver transplantation", "clinical trial", "operational tolerance" and "immunosuppression withdrawal" was performed, and relevant articles published in English in the past decade were reviewed. Full-text publications relevant to the field were selected and relevant articles from reference lists were also included. Priority was given to those articles which are relevant to the review.

RESULTS

Because of the inherent tolerogenic property, around 20%-30% of liver transplantation recipients develop spontaneous operational tolerance after immunosuppression withdrawal, and the percentage may be even higher in pediatric living donor liver transplantation recipients. Several natural killer and gammadeltaT cell related markers have been identified to be associated with the tolerant state in liver transplantation patients. Despite the progress, clinical operational tolerance is still rare in liver transplantation. Reprogramming the recipient immune system by creating chimerism and regulatory cell therapies is among newer promising means to achieve clinical liver transplantation tolerance in the future.

CONCLUSION

Although clinical operational tolerance is still rare in liver transplantation recipients, ongoing basic research and collaborative clinical trials may help to decipher the mystery of transplantation tolerance and extend the potential benefits of drug withdrawal to an increasing number of patients in a more predictable fashion.

Expression of glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand in rat graft after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Costimulation between the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor and its ligand (GITRL) breaks immunologic tolerance induced by regulatory T cells. The purpose of this research was to examine the involvement of GITRL during rat liver transplantation, the survival of which depends on interactions between regulatory T cells and Kupffer cells (KCs).

METHODS

Recipients were divided into 2 groups: The allograft group underwent orthotopic liver transplantation from male Lewis to Brown Norway (BN) rats and the isograft group, BN-to-BN liver transplantation. We evaluated 2-week survival rates, histologic changes, as well as serum and supernatant levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); GITRL, and TNF-α expressions in the graft, and GITRL expression by graft-derived KCs.

RESULTS

TNF-α levels were increased in plasma and in the supernates of KCs during allograft transplantation compared with isograft liver transplantation (P <.05). The expressions of TNF-α and GITRL in liver grafts were increased during acute rejection. Furthermore, the expression of GITRL on KCs derived from allografts was increased compared with isografts (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

GITRL expression on KCs may mediate acute rejection in liver transplantation.

A prospective study of serum soluble CD30 in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The expression of CD30 is restricted to cells of the immune system and strictly regulated under physiological conditions. However, active immune cells express CD30 and soluble CD30 (sCD30) is released. Several investigators reported the relevance for sCD30 as a predictive marker for allograft rejection following organ transplantation. We investigated the role of sCD30 in 30 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. sCD30 was measured at different time points until day 120 post transplant. There was a great variety of sCD30 at baseline before transplantation. At time of engraftment, patients who developed no or only mild signs of acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGvHD) until day 120 had significant lower levels of sCD30 than patients who developed severe aGvHD. Moreover, all patients with aGvHD degrees III/IV showed a clear increase in sCD30 levels before clinical signs of aGvHD. Levels of sCD30 decreased if patients responded to aGvHD-therapy. We suggest a potential role of sCD30 serum levels in prediction of aGvHD following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Monitoring the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A fundamental goal in transplantation is the establishment of allograft function without ongoing immunosuppression. Robust allograft tolerance has been established in experimental transplantation models, whereas clinical operational tolerance has been described most frequently following human liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical assessment of tolerance has been limited to laboratory evaluation of organ function. Additional tools include graft monitoring through biopsy and blood sampling for biomarker analysis. Current biomarkers under assessment in recent years include dendritic cell subsets, regulatory T cells, antidonor antibodies, and gene polymorphisms. Emerging microarray analysis that is being prospectively validated will also be reviewed. A further tool in the characterization of the tolerant patient will be the accurate enrollment of such patients into a multicenter registry that will prospectively follow the natural history of the patient withdrawn from immunosuppression and help facilitate the entry of interested patients to mechanistic and immune monitoring trials. The International Solid Organ Transplant Tolerance Registry (www.transplant-tolerance.org) will be briefly described.

SUMMARY

Effective biomarker characterization of the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient would allow earlier, well tolerated, prospective drug withdrawal with the goal of extending the potential benefits of drug minimization to an increasing number of patients in a more predictable fashion.