Comparison of serology assays and polymerase chain reaction for the monitoring of active cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

Discrimination of primary and chronic cytomegalovirus infection based on humoral immune profiles in pregnancy

BACKGROUNDMost humans have been infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) by midlife without clinical signs of disease. However, in settings in which the immune system is undeveloped or compromised, the virus is not adequately controlled and consequently presents a major infectious cause of both congenital disease during pregnancy as well as opportunistic infection in children and adults. With clear evidence that risk to the fetus varies with gestational age at the time of primary maternal infection, further research on humoral responses to primary CMV infection during pregnancy is needed.METHODSHere, systems serology tools were applied to characterize antibody responses to CMV infection in pregnant and nonpregnant women experiencing either primary or chronic infection.RESULTSWhereas strikingly different antibody profiles were observed depending on infection status, limited differences were associated with pregnancy status. Beyond known differences in IgM responses used clinically for identification of primary infection, distinctions observed in IgA and FcγR-binding antibodies and among antigen specificities accurately predicted infection status. Machine learning was used to define the transition from primary to chronic states and predict time since infection with high accuracy. Humoral responses diverged over time in an antigen-specific manner, with IgG3 responses toward tegument decreasing over time as typical of viral infections, while those directed to pentamer and glycoprotein B were lower during acute and greatest during chronic infection.CONCLUSIONIn sum, this work provides insights into the antibody response associated with CMV infection status in the context of pregnancy, revealing aspects of humoral immunity that have the potential to improve CMV diagnostics.FUNDINGCYMAF consortium and NIH NIAID.

Antimicrobial stewardship in solid organ transplant recipients: Current challenges and proposed metrics

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are challenging populations for antimicrobial stewardship interventions due to a variety of reasons, including immunosuppression, consequent risk of opportunistic and donor-derived infections, high rates of infection with multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), Clostridioides difficile, and need for prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. Despite this, data on stewardship interventions and metrics that address the distinct needs of these patients are limited.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the current state of antimicrobial stewardship in SOT recipients, existing interventions and metrics in this population, and considerations for implementation of transplant-specific stewardship programs.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial stewardship metrics are evolving even in the general patient population. Data on metrics applicable to the SOT population are even more limited. Standard process, outcomes, and balancing metrics may not always apply to the SOT population. A successful stewardship program for SOT recipients requires reviewing existing data, applying general stewardship principles, and understanding the nuances of SOT patients.

CONCLUSION

As antimicrobial stewardship interventions are being implemented in SOT recipients; new metrics are needed to assess their impact. In conclusion, SOT patients present a challenging but important opportunity for antimicrobial stewards.

ABBREVIATIONS

SOT, antimicrobial stewardship program, MDRO, Clostridioides difficile infection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, prospective audit and feedback, hematopoietic cell transplant, cytomegalovirus, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, surgical site infections, nucleic acid amplification testing, days of therapy, defined daily dose, and length of stay.

Prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in symptomatic newborns under 3 weeks in Tehran, Iran

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of congenital infection worldwide and infants with symptomatic congenital CMV (cCMV) infection are at significantly increased risk of developing adverse long-term outcomes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of cCMV infections in symptomatic infants under 3 weeks in Tehran, IRAN and to evaluate the usefulness of serologic markers in these neonates.

Methods

Urine and serum samples of 100 symptomatic infants, under 3 weeks old, with clinical signs referred to Tehran medical centers from June 2013 to December 2014, were collected and tested for CMV-DNA and IgG/IgM antibody titers by PCR and ELISA, respectively.

Results

CMV-DNA was detected in urine of 58 cases, whereas only 20 cases had detectable CMV-IgM titers. All CMV-IgM positive cases excreted CMV-DNA through their urine. Of the 100 patients, only 59 had CMV-IgG antibody and CMV-DNA was found in the urine of only 40 of them.

Conclusions

We conclude that CMV is an important etiologic agent of congenital infections in symptomatic infants in Tehran, IRAN (prevalence: 58%) and CMV-DNA detection immediately after delivery is recommended for early treatment and reduction of post infection problems. Furthermore, our study showed that the serologic markers are unreliable for diagnosis of cCMV infection in infants. This is the first report of cCMV prevalence in symptomatic congenital infections in Iran showing similarity with the world averages.

Overview of the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is recognized as the most common congenital viral infection in humans and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. This recognition of the clinical importance of invasive CMV disease in the setting of immunodeficiency and in children with congenital CMV infection has led to the development of new diagnostic procedures for the rapid identification of CMV. Diagnosis of acute maternal CMV infection by the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)M and low-avidity IgG requires confirmation of fetal infection, which is typically performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for CMV on amniotic fluid. Viral culture of the urine and saliva obtained within the first two weeks of life continues to be the gold standard for diagnosis of congenitally-infected infants. PCR assays of dried blood spots from newborns have been shown to lack sufficient sensitivity for the identification of most neonates with congenital CMV infection for universal screening purposes. However, saliva PCR assays are currently being assessed as a useful screening method for congenital CMV infection. In the immunocompromised host, newer rapid diagnostic assays, such as phosphoprotein 65 antigenemia and CMV real-time PCR of blood or plasma have allowed for preemptive treatment, reducing morbidity and mortality. However, lack of standardized real-time PCR protocols hinders the comparison of data from different centers and the development of uniform guidelines for the management of invasive CMV infections in immunocompromised individuals.

Lack of evidence for systemic cytomegalovirus reactivation in maintenance hemodialysis patients

The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation among hemodialysis (HD) patients is unknown. In 52 HD patients from a single center, CMV serology and quantitative PCR were performed. The detection limit of PCR was 20 copies/ml. Here, PCR ruled out CMV viremia, despite CMV-IgM seropositivity in 15.4% patients.

Methodology for monitoring cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of different detection methods for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after renal transplantation and also to establish a system to monitor therapy for CMV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 1516 renal transplant recipients from June 1994 to December 2006. All patients were screened for CMV-DNA. A total of 1402 patients had received CMV-IgG/IgM detection since June 1996 and 660 had received CMV antigen detection since June 2000.

RESULTS

A total of 664 (43.8%) recipients developed CMV infection. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the three methods, respectively, were 18.84%, 100% and 0.1884 for ELISA, 91.86%, 82.98% and 0.7484 for PCR, and 88.06%, 96.95% and 0.8501 for the CMV-pp65 antigenemia test. The sensitivity and specificity of the two combined detection methods (CMV-DNA and CMV-pp65) for post-operation CMV infection were 93.49% and 99.06%; the two detection methods had significant dependability (p<0.05) in diagnosis of CMV infection and in evaluation of therapeutic effect of antiviral drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Only ELISA can be used as a screening index in order to distinguish whether the donors or recipients are infected with CMV or not. CMV-pp65 antigenemia can help guide clinical therapy for CMV infection. CMV-pp65 and CMV-PCR combined together provide a more effective method to monitor CMV infection and predict its outcome.

Monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infection in bone marrow and liver transplant recipients by antigenaemia assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is a common complication in transplant recipients. Sensitive, specific and timely diagnostic tests for the detection of HCMV infection remain essential for successful therapy. The results of three tests to detect HCMV in bone marrow and liver transplant recipients were compared: a pp65 antigenaemia assay, an immediate-early (IE) antigenaemia assay and an anti-HCMV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Of 1344 samples, 911 (67.8%) and 917 (68.2%) samples were positive for pp65 and IE, respectively. The coincidence level was 85.1%. There was no statistical difference after transplantation to the first positive detection of HCMV (mean first checkout time) between the pp65 and IE antigenaemia assays. Moreover, the levels of HCMV detected by the pp65 and IE antigenaemia assays were significantly correlated. The HCMV-positivity rate as detected by the anti-HCMV IgM ELISA was 11.1%, which was significantly different from the IE and pp65 antigenaemia assays. We suggest that the IE antigenaemia assay could replace the pp65 antigenaemia assay for monitoring active HCMV infection and early detection of HCMV infection.