Hepatic steatosis in organ donors: disparity between surgery and histology?

Impact of Donor Obesity on Graft and Recipient Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The effect of donor body mass index (BMI) on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes remains unclear.

Methods

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and bibliographic reference lists was conducted. All comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of LT in obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and nonobese donors (BMI < 30 kg/m2) were included, and their risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I assessment tool. Patient and graft survival, acute rejection, and graft failure requiring retransplantation were evaluated as outcome parameters. A random-effects model was used for outcome synthesis.

Results

We included 6 comparative studies reporting a total of 5071 liver transplant recipients from 708 obese and 4363 nonobese donors. There was no significant difference in 1-y (89.1% versus 84.0%, odds ratio [OR] 1.58; 95% CI 0.63-3.94, P = 0.33), 5-y (74.2%% versus 73.5%, OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.45-2.80, P = 0.81) graft survival, and 1-y (87.1% versus 90.3%, OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.15, P = 0.17) and 5-y (64.5% versus 71.6%, OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49-1.05, P = 0.08) patient survival between 2 groups. Furthermore, recipients from obese and nonobese donors had a comparable risk of graft failure requiring retransplantation (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.33-2.60, P = 0.88) or acute graft rejection (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.45-1.11, P = 0.13).

Conclusions

A meta-analysis of the best available evidence (level 2a) demonstrates that donor obesity does not seem to have a negative impact on graft or patient outcomes. The available studies might be subject to selection bias as the grafts from obese donors are usually subject to biopsy to exclude steatosis and the recipients usually belong to the low-risk group. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of donors subgrouped by various higher BMI on graft and patient-related outcomes as well as to capture data of the discarded grafts from obese donors; hence, selection criteria for the grafts that could be used for transplantation from obese donors is identified.

Clinical Application of Infrared Spectroscopy in Liver Transplantation for Rapid Assessment of Lipid Content in Liver Graft

Liver transplantation (LT) is a major treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases. Steatosis is a significant risk factor for primary graft nonfunction and associated with poor long-term graft outcomes. Traditionally, the evaluation of steatosis is based on frozen section examination to estimate the percentage of hepatocytes containing lipid vesicles. However, this visual evaluation correlates poorly with the true lipid content. This study aimed to address the potential of infrared (IR) microspectroscopy for rapidly estimating lipid content in the context of LT and assessing its impact on survival. Clinical data were collected for >20 months from 58 patients who underwent transplantation. For each liver graft, macrovacuolar steatosis and microvesicular steatosis were evaluated through histologic examination of frozen tissue section. Triglycerides (TG) were further quantified using gas phase chromatography coupled with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and estimated by IR microspectroscopy. A linear relationship and significant correlation were observed between the TG measured by GC-FID and those estimated using IR microspectroscopy (R2 = 0.86). In some cases, microvesicular steatosis was related to high lipid content despite low levels of macrovacuolar steatosis. Seven patients experienced posttransplantation liver failure, including 5 deceased patients. All patients underwent transplantation with grafts containing significantly high TG levels. A concentration of 250 nmol/mg was identified as the threshold above which the risk of failure after LT significantly increased, affecting 35% of patients. Our study established a strong correlation between LT outcomes and lipid content. IR microspectroscopy proved to be a rapid and reliable approach for assessing the lipid content in clinical settings.

Graft Steatosis and Donor Diabetes Mellitus Additively Impact on Recipient Outcomes After Liver Transplantation-A European Registry Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biopsy-proven severe graft steatosis is associated with adverse outcomes after liver transplantation. The concomitant presence of metabolic risk factors might further increase this risk. We studied the association between graft steatosis and metabolic risk factors in the donor, with recipient outcomes after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We analyzed data from all consecutive first adult full-graft donation after brain death (DBD) liver transplantations performed in the Eurotransplant region between 2010 and 2020. The presence of graft steatosis and metabolic risk factors was assessed through a review of donor (imaging) reports, and associations with recipient retransplantation-free survival were studied through survival analyses.

RESULTS

Of 12 174 transplantations, graft steatosis was detected in 2689 (22.1%), and donor diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and dyslipidemia were present in 1245 (10.2%), 5056 (41.5%), and 524 (4.3%). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, graft steatosis (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.197, p < 0.001) and donor DM (aHR 1.157, p = 0.004) were independently associated with impaired retransplantation-free survival. Graft steatosis and donor DM conferred an additive risk of retransplantation or death (DM alone, aHR: 1.156 [p = 0.0185]; steatosis alone, aHR: 1.200 [p < 0.001]; both steatosis and DM, aHR: 1.381 [p < 0.001]). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses focusing on retransplantation-free survival within 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft steatosis and donor diabetes mellitus additively increase the risk of retransplantation or death in adult DBD liver transplantation. Future studies should focus on methods to assess and improve the quality of these high-risk grafts. Until such time, caution should be exercised when considering these grafts for transplantation.

LiverColor: An Artificial Intelligence Platform for Liver Graft Assessment

Hepatic steatosis, characterized by excess fat in the liver, is the main reason for discarding livers intended for transplantation due to its association with increased postoperative complications. The current gold standard for evaluating hepatic steatosis is liver biopsy, which, despite its accuracy, is invasive, costly, slow, and not always feasible during liver procurement. Consequently, surgeons often rely on subjective visual assessments based on the liver's colour and texture, which are prone to errors and heavily depend on the surgeon's experience. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple, rapid, and accurate method for detecting steatosis in donor livers to improve the decision-making process during liver procurement. We developed LiverColor, a co-designed software platform that integrates image analysis and machine learning to classify a liver graft into valid or non-valid according to its steatosis level. We utilized an in-house dataset of 192 cases to develop and validate the classification models. Colour and texture features were extracted from liver photographs, and graft classification was performed using supervised machine learning techniques (random forests and support vector machine). The performance of the algorithm was compared against biopsy results and surgeons' classifications. Usability was also assessed in simulated and real clinical settings using the Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire. The predictive models demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82, with an accuracy of 85%, significantly surpassing the accuracy of visual inspections by surgeons. Experienced surgeons rated the platform positively, appreciating not only the hepatic steatosis assessment but also the dashboarding functionalities for summarising and displaying procurement-related data. The results indicate that image analysis coupled with machine learning can effectively and safely identify valid livers during procurement. LiverColor has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of liver assessments, reducing the reliance on subjective visual inspections and improving transplantation outcomes.

A Clinical Tool to Guide Selection and Utilization of Marginal Donor Livers With Graft Steatosis in Liver Transplantation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Donor liver biopsy (DLBx) in liver transplantation provides information on allograft quality; however, predicting outcomes from these allografts remains difficult.

Methods.

Between 2006 and 2015, 16 691 transplants with DLBx were identified from the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified donor and recipient characteristics associated with 30-d, 90-d, 1-y, and 3-y graft survival. A composite model, the Liver Transplant After Biopsy (LTAB) score, was created. The Mini-LTAB was then derived consisting of only donor age, macrosteatosis on DLBx, recipient model for end-stage liver disease score, and cold ischemic time. Risk groups were identified for each score and graft survival was evaluated. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results.

The LTAB model used 14 variables and 5 risk groups and identified low-, mild-, moderate-, high-, and severe-risk groups. Compared with moderate-risk recipients, severe-risk recipients had increased risk of graft loss at 30 d (hazard ratio, 3.270; 95% confidence interval, 2.568-4.120) and at 1 y (2.258; 1.928-2.544). The Mini-LTAB model identified low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Graft survival in Mini-LTAB high-risk transplants was significantly lower than moderate- or low-risk transplants at all time points.

Conclusions.

The LTAB and Mini-LTAB scores represent guiding principles and provide clinically useful tools for the successful selection and utilization of marginal allografts in liver transplantation.

Contemporary strategies to assess and manage liver donor steatosis: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to a persistent shortage of donor livers, attention has turned toward ways of utilizing marginal grafts, particularly those with steatosis, without incurring inferior outcomes. Here we review the evaluation and utilization of steatotic liver allografts, highlight recently published data, and discuss novel methods of graft rehabilitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although severe liver allograft (>60%) steatosis has been associated with inferior graft and recipient outcomes, mild (<30%) steatosis has not. There is ongoing debate regarding safe utilization of grafts with moderate (30-60%) steatosis. Presently, no established protocols for evaluating steatosis in donor candidates or utilizing such grafts exist. Liver biopsy is accepted as the gold standard technique, though noninvasive methods have shown promise in accurately predicting steatosis. More recently, machine perfusion has been shown to enhance ex situ liver function and reduce steatosis, emerging as a potential means of optimizing steatotic grafts prior to transplantation.

SUMMARY

Steatotic liver allografts constitute a large proportion of deceased donor organs. Further work is necessary to define safe upper limits for the acceptable degree of steatosis, develop standardized evaluation protocols, and establish utilization guidelines that prioritize safety. Machine perfusion has shown promise in rehabilitating steatotic grafts and offers the possibility of expanding the deceased donor pool.

Pilot study of a noninvasive real-time optical backscatter probe in liver transplantation

Transplantation of severely steatotic donor livers is associated with early allograft dysfunction and poorer graft survival. Histology remains the gold standard diagnostic of donor steatosis despite the lack of consensus definition and its subjective nature. In this prospective observational study of liver transplant patients, we demonstrate the feasibility of using a handheld optical backscatter probe to assess the degree of hepatic steatosis and correlate the backscatter readings with clinical outcomes. The probe is placed on the surface of the liver and emits red and near infrared light from the tip of the device and measures the amount of backscatter of light from liver tissue via two photodiodes. Measurement of optical backscatter (Mantel-Cox P < 0.0001) and histopathological scoring of macrovesicular steatosis (Mantel-Cox P = 0.046) were predictive of 5-year graft survival. Recipients with early allograft dysfunction defined according to both Olthoff (P = 0.0067) and MEAF score (P = 0.0097) had significantly higher backscatter levels from the donor organ. Backscatter was predictive of graft loss (AUC 0.75, P = 0.0045). This study demonstrates the feasibility of real-time measurement of optical backscatter in donor livers. Early results indicate readings correlate with steatosis and may give insight to graft outcomes such as early allograft dysfunction and graft loss.

Higher thresholds for the utilization of steatotic allografts in liver transplantation: Analysis from a U.S. national database

Background

Historically, liver allografts with >30% macrosteatosis (MaS) on donor biopsy have been associated with early allograft dysfunction and worse graft survival; however, successful outcomes have been reported in small cohorts. This study proposes an elevated MaS threshold for organ utilization without detriment to graft survival.

Methods

The UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database was evaluated for transplants between 2006–2015. Graft survival up to 1-year was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses, and by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, including donor and recipient characteristics. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of graft loss are reported.

Results

Thirty-day risk of graft loss was increased with MaS as low as 10–19% (OR [95% CI] 1.301 [1.055–1.605], p<0.0001) and peaked with MaS 50–59% (2.921 [1.672–5.103]). At 1-year, risk of graft loss remained elevated with MaS 40–49% (1.465 [1.002–2.142]) and MaS 50–59% (1.978 [1.281–3.056], p = 0.0224). Multivariable models were created for Lower and Higher MELD recipients and MaS cutoffs were established. In Lower MELD recipients, organs with ≥50% MaS had increased risk of graft loss at 30 days (2.451 [1.541–3.897], p = 0.0008) and 1-year post-transplant (1.720 [1.224–2.418], p = 0.0125). Higher MELD recipients had increased risk of graft loss at 30 days with allografts showing MaS ≥40% (4.204 [1.440–5.076], p = 0.0016). At 1-year the risk remained increased, but MaS was not significant predictor of graft loss.048 [1.131–3.710], p = 0.0616). In both MELD cohorts, organs with MaS levels below threshold had similar survival to those transplanted without a donor biopsy.

Conclusions

In conjunction with recipient selection, organs with MaS up to 50% may be safely used without detriment to outcomes.

[Donor liver histology : Joint recommendations of the DGP, DTG and DSO]

BACKGROUND

The indications, implementation and reporting of liver biopsies for deceased organ donation are not mandatory or regulated. Reliable data on outcome quality and prognostic relevance are therefore not available. Defined standards are thus required to enable meaningful studies and to ensure high data quality of a national transplantation registry.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of a synopsis of available studies and literature-based recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Against the background of an organ shortage and a growing number of older donors, pretransplantation liver histology is of significant relevance to guide clinical decision making. With the joint recommendations of the German Transplantation Society (DTG), the German Society of Pathology (DGP) and the German Organ Transplantation Foundation (DSO) standardized procedures are defined for the first time.

Evaluation of a micro-spectrometer for the real-time assessment of liver graft with mild-to-moderate macrosteatosis: A proof of concept study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver macrosteatosis (MS) is a major predictor of graft dysfunction after transplantation. However, frozen section techniques to quantify steatosis are often unavailable in the context of procurements, and the findings of preoperative imaging techniques correlate poorly with those of permanent sections, so that the surgeon is ultimately responsible for the decision. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of a non-invasive pocket-sized micro-spectrometer (PSM) for the real-time estimation of MS.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a commercial PSM by scanning the liver capsule. A double pathological quantification of MS was performed on permanent sections. Initial calibration (training cohort) was performed on 35 livers (MS ≤60%) and an algorithm was created to correlate the estimated (PSM) and known (pathological) MS values. A second assessment (validation cohort) was then performed on 154 grafts.

RESULTS

Our algorithm achieved a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.81. Its validation on the second cohort demonstrated a Lin's concordance coefficient of 0.78. Accuracy reached 0.91%, with reproducibility of 86.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for MS ≥30% were 66.7%, 100%, 100% and 98%, respectively. The PSM could predict the absence (<30%)/presence (≥30%) of MS with a kappa coefficient of 0.79. Neither graft weight nor height, donor body mass index nor the CT-scan liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio could accurately predict MS.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that a PSM can reliably and reproducibly assess mild-to-moderate MS. Its low cost and the immediacy of results may offer considerable added-value decision support for surgeons. This tool could avoid the detrimental and prolonged ischaemia caused by the pathological examination of (potentially) marginal grafts. This device now needs to be assessed in the context of a large-scale multicentre study.

LAY SUMMARY

Macro-vacuolar liver steatosis is a major prognostic factor for outcomes after liver transplantation. However, it is often difficult for logistical reasons to get this estimation during procurement. Therefore, we developed an algorithm for a commercial, portable and affordable spectrometer to accurately estimate this content in a real-time fashion. This device could be of great interest for clinical decision-making to accept or discard a potential human liver graft.

Evolution of dynamic, biochemical, and morphological parameters in hypothermic machine perfusion of human livers: A proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is increasingly investigated as a means to assess liver quality, but data on viability markers is inconsistent and the effects of different perfusion routes and oxygenation on perfusion biomarkers are unclear.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, randomised, multi-arm, parallel study using discarded human livers for evaluation of HMP using arterial, oxygen-supplemented venous and non-oxygen-supplemented venous perfusion. The study included 2 stages: in the first stage, 25 livers were randomised into static cold storage (n = 7), hepatic artery HMP (n = 10), and non-oxygen-supplemented portal vein HMP (n = 8). In the second stage, 20 livers were randomised into oxygen-supplemented and non-oxygen-supplemented portal vein HMP (n = 11 and 9, respectively). Changes in dynamic, biochemical, and morphologic parameters during 4-hour preservation were compared between perfusion groups, and between potentially transplantable and non-transplantable livers.

RESULTS

During arterial perfusion, resistance was higher and flow was lower than venous perfusion (p = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively); this was associated with higher perfusate markers during arterial perfusion (p>0.05). Supplementary oxygen did not cause a significant alteration in the studied parameters. Morphology was similar between static and dynamic preservation groups. Perfusate markers were 2 fold higher in non-transplantable livers (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial only perfusion might not be adequate for graft perfusion. Hepatocellular injury markers are accessible and easy to perform and could offer insight into graft quality, but large randomised trials are needed to identify reliable quality assessment biomarkers.

Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for fatty liver grafts in rats and humans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pretreatment of marginal organs by perfusion is a promising opportunity to make more organs available for transplantation. Protection of human donation after cardiac death (DCD) livers by a novel machine perfusion technique, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), was recently established. Herein, we tested whether HOPE is also useful for fatty liver grafts, using a rodent transplant model.

METHODS

Rats were fed over three weeks with a special methionine-choline-deficient diet (MCDD) to induce severe hepatic macrosteatosis (≥60%). Afterwards, livers were transplanted with either minimal or 12h cold storage. Additional liver grafts were treated after 12h cold storage with 1h HOPE before transplantation. Graft injury after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was assessed in terms of oxidative stress, damage-associated molecular patterns release, toll-like receptor-4 activation, cytokine release, endothelial activation, and the development of necrosis and fibrosis.

RESULTS

Implantation of cold stored macrosteatotic liver grafts induced massive reperfusion injury after OLT, compared to controls (non-fatty livers). HOPE treatment after cold storage failed to change the degree of steatosis itself, but markedly decreased reperfusion injury after OLT, as detected by less oxidative stress, less nuclear injury, less Kupffer- and endothelial cell activation, as well as less fibrosis within one week after OLT. Protective effects were lost in the absence of oxygen in the HOPE perfusate.

CONCLUSION

HOPE after cold storage of fatty livers prevents significant reperfusion injury and improves graft function, comparable to the effects of HOPE in DCD livers and DCD kidneys. HOPE treatment is easy and may become a universal concept to further expand the donor pool.

LAY SUMMARY

An increasing number of donor livers contain fat. It is important to harness marginal livers, which may contain fat, as the stock of donor livers is limited. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) prevents reperfusion injury and improves liver graft function. HOPE offers a simple and low-cost option for treating liver grafts in transplant centers, even after cold storage, instead of transporting machines to the place of procurement. HOPE could be used globally to expand the donor pool.

Maximising the use of freshly isolated human hepatocytes

INTRODUCTION

Freshly isolated human hepatocytes are the best model for predicting adverse drug reactions. However, their preparation and use present the investigator with many variables that are beyond their control. These include operation continuity and timing, size and number of cut surfaces on liver tissue and the prior history of the patient. To exploit the potential of freshly isolated human hepatocytes a method is required to preserve the cells in their initial in vivo like state. This experimental pausing allows experiments to be prioritised at convenient times of the day.

METHODS

A novel approach for selecting viable human hepatocytes by functional attachment to a gelatin gel is described rather than relying on their physical characteristics. The cells are preserved as a monolayer on the semi-solid support at 10°C as single spherical entities.

RESULTS

The hepatocytes can be released into suspension, when required, by a temperature transition to 37°C for 20min. The cells can be used in suspension or as a monolayer. The length of preservation depends upon the source tissue. Hepatocytes from normal liver can be maintained for at least 4days and demonstrated to have the same level of CYP3A4 and the enzymes involved in glucuronidation and sulphation as freshly isolated cells. Cells from fatty liver, attached to gelatin, vary in their preservation time but it is at least 24h and so confluent monolayers, that survive at 37°C can be generated the following day.

DISCUSSION

The technique enables freshly isolated human hepatocytes to be used more effectively. They can be preserved in times of plenty so more experimentation is possible. Alternatively, with poorer fatty cells the initial attachment on gelatin enables confluent monolayers of lipid rich cells to be studied.

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy accurately quantifies various degrees of liver steatosis in murine models of fatty liver disease

Background

A real-time objective evaluation for the extent of liver steatosis during liver transplantation is currently not available. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) rapidly and accurately assesses the extent of steatosis in human livers with mild steatosis. However, it is yet unknown whether DRS accurately quantifies moderate/severe steatosis and is able to distinguish between micro- and macrovesicular steatosis.

Methods

C57BL/6JolaHsd mice were fed wit a choline-deficient l-amino acid-defined diet (CD-AA) or a choline-sufficient l-amino acid-defined control diet (CS-AA) for 3, 8, and 20 weeks. In addition B6.V-Lepob/OlaHsd (ob/ob) mice and their lean controls were studied. A total of 104 DRS measurements were performed in liver tissue ex vivo. The degree of steatosis was quantified from the DRS data and compared with histopathological analysis.

Results

When assessed by histology, livers of mice fed with a CD-AA and CS-AA diet displayed macrovesicular steatosis (range 0–74 %), ob/ob mice revealed only microvesicular steatosis (range 75–80 %), and their lean controls showed no steatosis. The quantification of steatosis by DRS correlated well with pathology (correlation of 0.76 in CD-AA/CS-AA fed mice and a correlation of 0.75 in ob/ob mice). DRS spectra did not distinguish between micro- and macrovesicular steatosis. In samples from CD-AA/CS-AA fed mice, the DRS was able to distinguish between mild and moderate/severe steatosis with a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 81 %, respectively.

Conclusion

DRS can quantify steatosis with good agreement to histopathological analysis. DRS may be useful for real-time objective evaluation of liver steatosis during liver transplantation, especially to differentiate between mild and moderate/severe steatosis.

Donor Hepatic Steatosis and Outcome After Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is increasing need to expand availability of donor liver grafts, including steatotic livers. Steatotic liver is associated with poor outcome post-transplantation but with conflicting results in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of steatotic livers on liver transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

An electronic search of OVID Medline and Embase databases was performed to identify clinical studies that reported outcomes of steatotic livers in liver transplantation. Data were extracted, and basic descriptive statistics were used to summarise data pooled from individual clinical studies.

RESULTS

Ninety-two articles were identified, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria, and stratified analysis were performed. There was a lack of standardised definition of primary non-function or impaired primary function amongst the studies and description of type of steatosis. Severely (>60%) steatotic grafts are associated with increased risk of poor graft function, whilst moderate-severe (>30%) steatotic grafts are associated with decreased graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence showed increased risk of poor graft outcome in moderate-severe steatotic livers. A large prospective multi-centred trial will be required to identify the true risks of steatotic livers. Consistent definition of primary non-function/impaired primary function and description of type of steatosis is also required.

Similar outcome after transplantation of moderate macrovesicular steatotic and nonsteatotic livers when the cold ischemia time is kept very short

BACKGROUND

Livers with moderate (30-60%) macrovesicular steatosis have been associated with poor outcome after transplantation. Aim of this study was to examine the outcome after transplantation of livers with moderate macrovesicular steatosis when the cold ischemia time (CIT) is kept very short.

METHODS

Postoperative outcome of 19 recipients of a moderate steatotic liver were compared with a matched control group of 95 recipients of a nonsteatotic liver graft (1:5 ratio). We studied graft/patient survival rates, incidences of primary nonfunction, postoperative complications (classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), first-week postoperative hepatic injury serum markers (AST/ALT), and liver function tests (PT time/bilirubin/lactate). In addition, we studied reversal of graft steatosis in follow-up biopsies.

RESULTS

Median CIT in livers with moderate steatosis and in controls was below 8 h in both groups. Although short- and long-term patient/graft survival rates and results of liver function tests were similar, serum markers of hepatic injury and postoperative complications (especially grade IVa) were significantly higher in recipients of a moderate steatotic liver. Reversal of steatosis was seen in 9 of the 11 (82%) recipients with follow-up liver biopsies.

CONCLUSION

Despite the association with severe postoperative complications, moderate macrovesicular steatotic livers can be used successfully for transplantation if the CIT is kept very short.

Oil Red O-assessed macrosteatosis in liver transplant donor biopsies predicts ischemia-reperfusion injury and clinical outcome

Steatosis in donor livers is an accepted adverse prognostic factor after liver transplantation. While its semiquantitative assessment shows varying reproducibility, it is questioned as a standard method. Additionally, the influence of hepatic steatosis on ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R injury) has not been evaluated in biopsies after reperfusion. We compared different staining and analyzing methods for the assessment of donor liver steatosis in order to predict I/R injury and clinical outcome after transplantation. To do this, 56 paired pre- and post-reperfusion liver biopsies were analyzed for macro- (MaS)/micro- (MiS) and total steatosis in cryo and permanent sections by special fat (Oil Red O or ORO) and standard stains. Computerized morphometrical analyses were compared to the semiquantitative assessment by a pathologist. I/R injury was determined histopathologically and by M30 immunohistochemistry. We found ORO to be more sensitive in detecting hepatic steatosis with higher reproducibility for MaS. Semiquantitative analyses were highly reproducible and not inferior to computerized morphometry. Categorized MaS as determined by ORO correlated with the extent of I/R injury, initial poor function, liver enzymes, and survival. Therefore fat stains like ORO are a reliable and easy method comprising significant advantages in the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and are thereby of prognostic value. Computerized analysis is a precise tool though not superior to semiquantitative analyses.

Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.

Assessment of hepatic steatosis by transplant surgeon and expert pathologist: a prospective, double-blind evaluation of 201 donor livers

An accurate clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis before transplantation is critical for successful outcomes after liver transplantation, especially if a pathologist is not available at the time of procurement. This prospective study investigated the surgeon's accuracy in predicting hepatic steatosis and organ quality in 201 adult donor livers. A steatosis assessment by a blinded expert pathologist served as the reference gold standard. The surgeon's steatosis estimate correlated more strongly with large-droplet macrovesicular steatosis [ld-MaS; nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient (rS ) = 0.504] versus small-droplet macrovesicular steatosis (sd-MaS; rS  = 0.398). True microvesicular steatosis was present in only 2 donors (1%). Liver texture criteria (yellowness, absence of scratch marks, and round edges) were mainly associated with ld-MaS (variance = 0.619) and were less associated with sd-MaS (variance = 0.264). The prediction of ≥30% ld-MaS versus <30% ld-MaS was excellent when liver texture criteria were used (accuracy = 86.2%), but it was less accurate when the surgeon's direct estimation of the steatosis percentage was used (accuracy = 75.5%). The surgeon's quality grading correlated with the degree of ld-MaS and the surgeon's steatosis estimate as well as the incidence of poor initial function and primary nonfunction. In conclusion, the precise estimation of steatosis remains challenging even in experienced hands. Liver texture characteristics are more helpful in identifying macrosteatotic organs than the surgeon's actual perception of steatosis. These findings are especially important when histological assessment is not available at the donor's hospital.

[Frozen section diagnostics in visceral surgery. Liver, bile ducts and pancreas]

Intraoperative examination of specimens from the liver, bile ducts, gallbladder and pancreas are widely used in routine fresh frozen section diagnostics. The main clinical requests focus on diagnosis of masses of unknown dignity as well as evaluation of surgical margins in oncological resections. In addition, assessment of organ quality for transplantation is also often required.

Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment

Donor livers are not generally accepted for liver transplantation if intraoperative frozen section histology on wedge biopsies provides evidence for more severe steatosis. In this reliability study, assessment of steatosis in donor liver biopsies by different approaches (frozen sections vs. paraffin sections; macrovesicular steatosis vs. microvesicular steatosis), different observers, and different evaluation methods (conventional microscopy vs. point grid analysis on digital microphotographs) was compared. One hundred twenty consecutive donor liver biopsies were investigated. Intraoperative diagnosis was made on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained frozen sections. The residual portion of each biopsy was analyzed later on H&E-, diastase-resistant PAS-, and Elastica van Gieson-stained paraffin sections. Microvesicular steatosis and macrovesicular steatosis were classified semiquantitatively into 5 % steps. Additionally, point grid counting was applied on ten digital microphotographs per slide. The values for steatosis revealed a wide range of data between 0 and 70 or 85 % (mean values, 12.0-18.3 %), considering all types of specimens. The results of the two observers were highly correlated for macrovesicular steatosis (r ≥ 0.925) and for microvesicular steatosis (r ≥ 0.880). The values for macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis, however, showed poor correlation (r ≤ 0.581). The rate of agreement between the two observers ranged between 84.2 and 95.8 % (κ, 0.763-0.937), depending on the threshold setting. For point grid analysis, significantly lower mean values and ranges for both types of steatosis compared to conventional histopathology were found (p < 0.001). Comparing the results of point grid analysis with those of conventional histopathology, a relatively loose correlation was found (r, 0.581-0.779). Intraoperative histology remains a reliable and highly relevant method for the assessment of steatosis in liver donor grafts. It represents one important component in the decision-finding whether or not a donor liver should be accepted and should possibly be combined with results of preoperative computed tomography imaging. Considering our data, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis should be analyzed separately due to the limited correlation between them.

Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Donor liver steatosis can impact on liver allograft outcomes. The aim of the present study was to comprehensively report on the impact of type and grade of donor steatosis, as well as donor and recipient factors, including the reported Donor Risk Index (DRI), on liver allograft outcomes.

METHODS

A review of unit data for all adult liver transplant procedures from 2001 to 2007, as well as donor offers. Donor liver biopsies were regraded for steatosis by an experienced histopathologist.

RESULTS

Steatosis was detected in 184/255 (72%) of biopsies, of which 114 (62%) had microvesicular steatosis (MiS; 68 mild, 22 moderate, 24 severe) and 70 (38%) macrovesicular steatosis (MaS; 59 mild, 7 moderate, 4 severe). The majority (66/70, 94%) of biopsies with MaS also contained MiS. Allograft steatosis was associated with increasing donor body mass index (P = 0.000), plus donor male sex (P < 0.05). Primary non function (P = 0.002), early renal failure (P = 0.040), and requirement for retransplantation (P = 0.012) were associated only with severe MaS. Early biliary complications were associated with moderate MaS (P = 0.039). Only severe MaS was significantly associated with inferior allograft survival at 3 months (relative risk = 12.09 [8.75-19.05], P = 0.000) and 1 year (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

MiS is a common finding and frequently coexists with MaS on liver allograft biopsy, while isolated MaS is uncommon. Only the presence of moderate to severe MaS is associated with inferior early allograft outcomes. The impact of severe MaS on allograft survival appears greater than other donor factors, including the calculated DRI.

Extended donors in liver transplantation

Several criteria are used to differentiate between standard and extended allograft donors. These criteria include deceased after cardiac death, advanced donor age, steatosis, previous malignancy in the donor, hepatitis C virus-positive allografts, human T-cell lymphotropic virus-positive allografts, active infections in the donor, high-risk donors, split liver transplantations, and living donor liver transplantations. Review of the literature can lead each practitioner to incorporate extended criteria donors into their transplant program, thereby individualizing the use of these allografts, increasing the donor pool, and decreasing overall waitlist mortality.

Liver transplantation using fatty livers: always feasible?

Steatotic liver grafts represent the most common type of "extended criteria" organs that have been introduced during the last two decades due to the disparity between liver transplant candidates and the number available organs. A precise definition and reliable and reproducible method for steatosis quantification is currently lacking and the potential influence of the chemical composition of hepatic lipids has not been addressed. In our view, these shortcomings appear to contribute significantly to the inconsistent results of studies reporting on graft steatosis and the outcome of liver transplantation. In this review, various definitions, prevalence and methods of quantification of liver steatosis will be covered. Ischemia/reperfusion injury of the steatotic liver and its consequences on post-transplant outcome will be discussed. Selection criteria for organ allocation and a number of emerging protective strategies are suggested.

Frozen-section diagnosis in donor livers: error rate estimation of steatosis degree

A high degree of macrovesicular steatosis is associated with a significant risk of graft dysfunction. Most centers, including ours, consider 60% the limit value for transplantability, while others have adopted 30% as a cutoff. Pretransplant frozen-section (PFS) evaluation is used for reliable quantification of steatosis. However, the accuracy of PFS analysis for the degree of steatosis has largely been debated due to its high grade of variability and subjectivity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of PFS diagnosis compared with subsequent paraffin histology samples. We retrospectively analyzed PFS from 52 consecutive liver donors. All PFS were blindly reviewed by two pathologists. The results were graded according to two classifications: (A) lower or higher than 60% steatosis, or (B) mild (0%-30%), moderate (30%-60%), or severe (>60%) steatosis. The rate of error for A (two-grade classification score) was 1.9% with the erroneous discharge of a viable organ. The error rate for B (three-grade classification score) was 7.7% with four discrepancies. In three cases, the discrepancy was related to the mild to moderate cutoff value, leading to a clinical error rate of 5.8% (discharging organs with statosis >30%, when we used more strict criteria). Our study validated PFS analysis as a reliable technique when the maximum value for organ transplantation was 60% steatosis. There was a higher error rate when a cutoff value of 30% was used. This finding suggests the usefulness of another technique to support a more precise steatosis evaluation.