1
|
Mehtani R, Saigal S. Long Term Complications of Immunosuppression Post Liver Transplant. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2023; 13:1103-1115. [PMID: 37975039 PMCID: PMC10643541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Improvement in immunosuppression has led to a remarkable improvement in short-term and long-term outcomes post-liver transplant (LT). However, with improvements in long-term survival, complications related to immunosuppressive drugs, either directly or indirectly, have also increased. The adverse events could be drug-specific, class-specific, or generic. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) are the backbone of the immunosuppression after LT and the main culprit associated with most of the complications, including renal failure, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), and metabolic syndrome. Steroids are also implicated in the development of diabetes, osteoporosis, and metabolic syndrome post-LT. The development of infections and de novo malignancies (DNMs) is a generic effect linked to the overall cumulative immunosuppression. The development of these complications significantly hampers the quality of life and leads to increased morbidity and mortality post-LT. Thus, it is important to minimize the cumulative immunosuppression dose while simultaneously preventing allograft rejection. This review provides up-to-date, comprehensive knowledge of the complications of long-term immunosuppression post-LT along with associated risk factors and strategies to minimize the risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Mehtani
- Department of Hepatology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana - 121001, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Transplant Hepatology, Centre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspecialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabeza Rivera FH, Concepcion BP, Levea SLL. Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation. ADVANCES IN KIDNEY DISEASE AND HEALTH 2023; 30:368-377. [PMID: 37657883 DOI: 10.1053/j.akdh.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease among liver transplant recipients is common and associated with an increased mortality risk. Several risk factors and causes for the development of chronic kidney disease have been identified. They can be divided into perioperative factors, such as unresolved acute kidney injury; donor-related factors, such as the use of extended criteria liver allografts; and recipient-related factors, such as the use of calcineurin inhibitors and the presence of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and obesity. There is a bimodal progression, more prominent during the initial post-transplant months, followed by a gradual but progressive decline over the subsequent years. Management strategies to prevent and treat chronic kidney disease in the general population can be reasonably applied to the liver transplant population and include addressing comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. Strategies to minimize or withdraw calcineurin inhibitors from the immunosuppressive regimen can slow progression of kidney dysfunction. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease should be considered for kidney transplantation due to its survival advantage. Allocation policy in the United States confers safety-net allocation priority for liver transplant recipients who develop advanced chronic kidney disease within the first year of liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco H Cabeza Rivera
- Katz Family Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | | - Swee-Ling L Levea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pacheco MP, Carneiro-D'Albuquerque LA, Mazo DF. Current aspects of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:45-61. [PMID: 35126839 PMCID: PMC8790396 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LT) exerts a severe effect on the survival of patients. The widespread adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease score strongly impacted CKD incidence after the procedure, as several patients are transplanted with previously deteriorated renal function. Due to its multifactorial nature, encompassing pre-transplantation conditions, perioperative events, and nephrotoxic immunosuppressor therapies, the accurate identification of patients under risk of renal disease, and the implementation of preventive approaches, are extremely important. Methods for the evaluation of renal function in this setting range from formulas that estimate the glomerular filtration rate, to non-invasive markers, although no option has yet proved efficient in early detection of kidney injury. Considering the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as a factor of utmost importance after LT, early nephroprotective strategies are highly recommended. They are based mainly on delaying the application of CNI during the immediate postoperative-period, reducing their dosage, and associating them with other less nephrotoxic drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. This review provides a critical assessment of the causes of renal dysfunction after LT, the methods of its evaluation, and the interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and belatedly after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana P Pacheco
- Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque
- Division of Digestive Organs Transplant, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel F Mazo
- Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences of University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-878, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiseman AC. CKD in Recipients of Nonkidney Solid Organ Transplants: A Review. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 80:108-118. [PMID: 34979161 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) after solid organ transplant is a common clinical presentation, affecting 10% to 20% of liver, heart and lung transplant recipients and accounting for approximately 5% of the kidney transplant waiting list. The causes of CKD are different for different types of transplants and are not all, or even predominantly, due to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, with significant heterogeneity particularly in liver transplant recipients. Many solid organ transplant recipients with advanced CKD benefit from kidney transplantation, but have a higher rate of death while waitlisted and higher mortality following transplant than the general kidney failure population. Recent organ allocation policies and proposals have attempted to address the appropriate identification and prioritization of candidates in need of a kidney transplant, either simultaneous with or following non-kidney transplant. Future research should focus on predictive factors for individuals identified at high risk for progression to kidney failure and death, and strategies to preserve kidney function and minimize the CKD burden in this unique patient population.
Collapse
|
5
|
Asian Liver Transplant Network Clinical Guidelines on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2019; 103:470-480. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
6
|
Welker MW, Weiler N, Bechstein WO, Herrmann E, Betz C, Schöffauer M, Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C, Amann K, Jung O. Key role of renal biopsy in management of progressive chronic kidney disease in liver graft recipients. J Nephrol 2018; 32:129-137. [PMID: 29946864 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0506-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT). The etiology of CKD is broad and may only be assessed accurately by renal histology. The current study aimed to analyze the safety of renal biopsy in daily clinical practice as well as its usefulness regarding management of CKD after LT. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data and renal biopsies obtained from patients with severe renal impairment (overt proteinuria, progressive deterioration of renal function) after LT with respect to safety, etiology of renal disease, and therapeutic consequences. RESULTS Renal biopsies were obtained from 14 patients at median (minimum-maximum) 3 (0.2-12) years after LT. No major complications associated with renal biopsy were observed. Histomorphological alterations were varied (nephrosclerosis, n = 5; IgA-glomerulonephritis, n = 4; tenofovir-associated nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 1, membranous glomerulonephritis, amyloid A amyloidosis, and calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy, n = 1, respectively). The diagnosis of specific renal diseases other than calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity facilitated specific treaments and avoided unnecessary modification of immunosuppression in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS Renal biopsy in patients with CKD after LT seems safe and may offer specific therapeutic options. Furthermore, unnecessary changes of immunosuppression can be avoided in a considerable number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin-Walter Welker
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Nina Weiler
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Wolf Otto Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eva Herrmann
- Institut für Biostatistik und mathematische Modellierung, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Betz
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mark Schöffauer
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Zeuzem
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Sarrazin
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,St. Josefs-Hospital, Beethoven Str. 20, 65189, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Abteilung für Nephropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Oliver Jung
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V., Standort Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Gotenstraße 6-8, 65929, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez‐Perálvarez M, Guerrero‐Misas M, Thorburn D, Davidson BR, Tsochatzis E, Gurusamy KS. Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD011639. [PMID: 28362060 PMCID: PMC6464256 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011639.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of liver transplantation, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections resulting from the immune response of the body against transplanted organ or tissues from a different person whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until October 2016 to identify randomised clinical trials on immunosuppression for liver transplantation. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adult participants undergoing liver transplantation (or liver retransplantation) for any reason. We excluded trials in which participants had undergone multivisceral transplantation or participants with established graft rejections. We considered any of the various maintenance immunosuppressive regimens compared with each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 26 trials (3842 participants) in the review, and 23 trials (3693 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The vast majority of the participants underwent primary liver transplantation. All of the trials were at high risk of bias, and all of the evidence was of low or very low quality. In addition, because of sparse data involving trials at high risk of bias, it is not possible to entirely rely on the results of the network meta-analysis. The trials included mainly participants undergoing primary liver transplantation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 3 to 144 months. The most common maintenance immunosuppression used as a control was tacrolimus. There was no evidence of difference in mortality (21 trials; 3492 participants) or graft loss (15 trials; 2961 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based on the network meta-analysis. In the direct comparison, based on a single trial including 222 participants, tacrolimus plus sirolimus had increased mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CrI 1.30 to 6.69) and graft loss (HR 2.34, 95% CrI 1.28 to 4.61) at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (1 trial; 719 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (2 trials; 940 participants), renal impairment (8 trials; 2233 participants), chronic kidney disease (1 trial; 100 participants), graft rejections (any) (16 trials; 2726 participants), and graft rejections requiring treatment (5 trials; 1025 participants) between the different immunosuppressive regimens. The network meta-analysis showed that the number of adverse events was lower with cyclosporine A than with many other immunosuppressive regimens (12 trials; 1748 participants), and the risk of retransplantation (13 trials; 1994 participants) was higher with cyclosporine A than with tacrolimus (HR 3.08, 95% CrI 1.13 to 9.90). None of the trials reported number of serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, or costs. FUNDING 14 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies who would benefit from the results of the trial; two trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 10 trials did not report the source of funding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on low-quality evidence from a single small trial from direct comparison, tacrolimus plus sirolimus increases mortality and graft loss at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. Based on very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis, we found no evidence of difference between different immunosuppressive regimens. We found very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis and low-quality evidence from direct comparison that cyclosporine A causes more retransplantation compared with tacrolimus. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid postrandomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft loss, renal impairment, chronic kidney disease, and retransplantation. Such trials should use tacrolimus as one of the control groups. Moreover, such trials ought to be designed in such a way as to ensure low risk of bias and low risks of random errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Rodríguez‐Perálvarez
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehdHepatology and Liver TransplantationAvenida Menéndez Pidal s/nCórdobaSpain14004
| | - Marta Guerrero‐Misas
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehdHepatology and Liver TransplantationAvenida Menéndez Pidal s/nCórdobaSpain14004
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryPond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Levitsky J, O’Leary J, Asrani S, Sharma P, Fung J, Wiseman A, Niemann C. Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Recipients: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2532-44. [PMID: 26932352 PMCID: PMC5007154 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Both acute and chronic kidney disease are common after liver transplantation and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The introduction of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score has directly correlated with an increased prevalence of perioperative renal dysfunction and the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations performed. Kidney dysfunction in this population is typically multifactorial and related to preexisting conditions, pretransplantation renal injury, perioperative events, and posttransplantation nephrotoxic immunosuppressive therapies. The management of kidney disease after liver transplantation is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine level is significantly elevated, few interventions affect the course of progression. Also, immunological factors such as antibody-mediated kidney rejection have become of greater interest given the rising liver-kidney transplant population. Therefore, this review, assembled by experts in the field and endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice, provides a critical assessment of measures of renal function and interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and late after liver and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Key points and practice-based recommendations for the prevention and management of kidney injury in this population are provided to offer guidance for clinicians and identify gaps in knowledge for future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Levitsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - J.G. O’Leary
- Division of Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - S. Asrani
- Division of Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - P. Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - J. Fung
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Center, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - A. Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO
| | - C.U. Niemann
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Endothelial C4d Deposition-Association With Chronic Liver Allograft Failure. Transplantation 2015; 99:1869-75. [PMID: 25706274 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The significance of humoral immune response for allograft survival after liver transplantation (LT) is still a matter of debate. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess immunological and clinical factors associated with advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) and chronic graft failure in LT recipients. METHODS Serum samples from 174 patients prospectively enrolled and followed up for 12 months were tested for anti-HLA antibodies and compared against donor HLA types. Immunohistochemical C4d staining was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue. RESULTS Mean time period from LT to enrollment was 66.9 ± 51.9 months. Independent predictive factors for graft failure included donor-positive cytomegalovirus serostatus (P = 0.02), donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA class II (P = 0.03), donor age (P = 0.01), hepatitis C virus allograft reinfection (P = 0.0008), and biliary complications (P = 0.003). HLA class II DSA and HLA class I antibody positivity, hepatitis C virus reinfection, and mycophenolate mofetil-free regimens were significant risk factors for advanced fibrosis after LT. There was a significant association between C4d deposition on allograft endothelial cells and presence of class II DSA (P < 0.0001). Patients with C4d deposits had a 4.3 times higher risk of graft failure than those with negative staining and a significantly lower median time to graft failure (94.6 months [range, 3.6-158.9 months] vs 176.4 months [range, 9.4-217.8 months], P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Screening for HLA DSA might be useful for early identification of LT recipients at increased risk of graft failure who could benefit from closer surveillance and tailored immunosuppressive regimens.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The rapid development of new diagnostic tests and improved therapy, especially the success of liver transplantation, has changed the outcome for children with liver disease, many of whom survive into adolescence without liver transplantation. The indications for transplantation in adolescence are similar to pediatric indications and reflect the medical advances made in this specialty that allow later transplantation. These young people need a different approach to management that involves consideration of their physical and psychological stage of development. A focused approach to their eventual transition to adult care is essential for long-term survival and quality of life.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kelly DA, Bucuvalas JC, Alonso EM, Karpen SJ, Allen U, Green M, Farmer D, Shemesh E, McDonald RA. Long-term medical management of the pediatric patient after liver transplantation: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2013; 19:798-825. [PMID: 23836431 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 06/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre A Kelly
- Liver Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, National Health Service Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goralczyk AD, Bari N, Abu-Ajaj W, Lorf T, Ramadori G, Friede T, Obed A. Calcineurin inhibitor sparing with mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Transplant 2012; 12:2601-7. [PMID: 22813081 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04157.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing acute and chronic renal failure. Moreover, introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score for primary allocation of liver grafts favors patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction, which in turn have a higher risk of posttransplant renal failure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) further increase the risk of renal failure and therefore sparing CNI with the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may improve renal function. MMF may either be used de novo in the immediate posttransplant period in combination with low-dose CNI (scenario 1) or patients that receive immunosuppression based on CNI may be converted to MMF in combination with minimization or elimination of CNI (scenario 2). Although many retrospective cohort studies and nonrandomized trials have implicated efficacy of this approach the evidence from randomized controlled studies has not been summarized. In the current review we report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Goralczyk
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kong Y, Wang D, Shang Y, Liang W, Ling X, Guo Z, He X. Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization in liver transplant patients with calcineurin-inhibitor-related renal dysfunction: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24387. [PMID: 21931704 PMCID: PMC3170329 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 08/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Introduction of calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) has made transplantation a miracle in the past century. However, the side effects of long-term use of CNI turn out to be one of the major challenges in the current century. Among these, renal dysfunction attracts more and more attention. Herein, we undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) minimization protocols in liver transplant recipients with CNI-related renal dysfunction. Methods We included randomized trials with no year and language restriction. All data were analyzed using random effect model by Review Manager 5.0. The primary endpoints were glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum creatinine level (sCr) and creatinine clearance rate (CrCl), and the secondary endpoints were acute rejection episodes, incidence of infection and patient survival at the end of follow-up. Results GFR was significantly improved in CNI minimization group than in routine CNI regimen group (Z = 5.45, P<0.00001; I2 = 0%). Likely, sCr level was significantly lower in the CNI minimization group (Z = 2.84, P = 0.005; I2 = 39%). However, CrCl was not significantly higher in the CNI minimization group (Z = 1.59, P = 0.11; I2 = 0%). Both acute rejection episodes and patient survival were comparable between two groups (rejection: Z = 0.01, P = 0.99; I2 = 0%; survival: Z = 0.28, P = 0.78; I2 = 0%, respectively). However, current CNI minimization protocols may be related to a higher incidence of infections (Z = 3.06, P = 0.002; I2 = 0%). Conclusion CNI minimization can preserve or even improve renal function in liver transplant patients with renal impairment, while sharing similar short term acute rejection rate and patient survival with routine CNI regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Kong
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dongping Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yushu Shang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenhua Liang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoting Ling
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Guo
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (ZG); (XH)
| | - Xiaoshun He
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (ZG); (XH)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cantarovich M, Brown NW, Ensom MHH, Jain A, Kuypers DRJ, Van Gelder T, Tredger JM. Mycophenolate monitoring in liver, thoracic, pancreas, and small bowel transplantation: a consensus report. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2011; 25:65-77. [PMID: 21454066 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2010.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2010] [Accepted: 12/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Assessing the value of mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring outside renal transplantation is hindered by the absence of any trial comparing fixed-dose and concentration-controlled therapy. However, in liver and thoracic transplantation particularly, clinical trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and case series have described MPA efficacy, exposure/efficacy relationships, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinical outcomes relating to plasma MPA concentrations. On the basis of this evidence, this report identifies MPA as an immunosuppressant for which the combination of variable disposition, efficacy, and adverse effects contributes to interindividual differences seemingly in excess of those optimal for a fixed-dosage mycophenolate regimen. Combined with experiences of MPA monitoring in other transplant indications, the data have been rationalized to define circumstances in which measurement of MPA concentrations can contribute to improved management of mycophenolate therapy in nonrenal transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Cantarovich
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Avenue West (R2.58), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Renal function in the long term after pediatric liver transplantation: is there a need for protocol kidney biopsies? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011; 15:608-13. [PMID: 20733490 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32833da439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With improving survival rates following solid organ transplantation, assessment of its success has broadened with a focus on long-term outcomes, including nongraft-related medical outcomes and family and patient perceptions of quality of life. Posttransplant renal dysfunction contributes to long-term morbidity and mortality following pediatric liver transplantation. In this review, we provide an overview of our understanding and approach to managing posttransplant renal dysfunction and highlight the existing gaps in knowledge in this area. RECENT FINDINGS The literature regarding renal dysfunction following liver transplant primarily focuses on the experience in the adult population. Studies on children are limited by small numbers and varying definitions of outcomes. Thus, lessons in the current literature must be closely examined before they can be extrapolated and applied to children. SUMMARY The current literature validates that posttransplant renal dysfunction is a frequent and important outcome for adults and children. Although the characteristics of children at high risk are less clear, calcineurin inhibitor minimization is considered a viable strategy for preserving renal function. The risk-benefit ratio of kidney biopsy in children and the possibility of renal preservation via immunosuppression withdrawal are intriguing concepts that remain to be defined.
Collapse
|
16
|
Differential effects of acute and sustained cyclosporine and tacrolimus on sympathetic nerve activity. J Hypertens 2010; 28:1928-34. [PMID: 20577127 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32833c20eb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We studied the effect of acute and sustained cyclosporine and tacrolimus on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in groups of healthy male volunteers. METHODS AND RESULTS Acute cyclosporine in normal dose (2.5 mg/kg) increased MSNA from 11 +/- 6 to 19 +/- 8 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Acute cyclosporine in high dose (10 mg/kg) increased MSNA from 13 +/- 6 to 25 +/- 4 bursts/min (P < 0.05) and increased heart rate and mean arterial pressure (heart rate from 64 +/- 8 to 74 +/- 6 b.p.m., MAP from 92 +/- 10 to 105 +/- 8 mmHg; both P < 0.05). Sustained cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 2 weeks) suppressed MSNA from 14 +/- 6 to 8 +/- 7 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Blood pressure increased from 89 +/- 6 to 98 +/- 6 mmHg (P < 0.05). Body weight increased and plasma renin activity was suppressed. Acute tacrolimus in regular dose (0.05 mg/kg) and high dose (0.20 mg/kg) had no effect on MSNA and blood pressure. Sustained tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg b.i.d. for 2 weeks) had no effect on blood pressure, body weight and plasma renin activity, but decreased MSNA from 14 +/- 6 to 8 +/- 5 bursts/min (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Sympathetic overactivity plays a role in the acute hypertensive action of cyclosporine. Cyclosporine given during 2 weeks increases blood pressure and suppresses MSNA, possibly by volume retention. Tacrolimus, in the presently applied dosages, does not cause hypertension or sympathetic overactivity. However, sustained tacrolimus also suppresses sympathetic activity, the reason of which is unclear.
Collapse
|
17
|
Campbell K, Ng V, Martin S, Magee J, Goebel J, Anand R, Martz K, Bucuvalas J. Glomerular filtration rate following pediatric liver transplantation--the SPLIT experience. Am J Transplant 2010; 10:2673-82. [PMID: 21114644 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03316.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Impaired kidney function is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT). Studies of this complication in children have been limited by small numbers and insensitive outcome measures. Our aim was to define the prevalence of, and identify risk factors for, post-LT kidney dysfunction in a multicenter pediatric cohort using measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). We conducted a cross-sectional study of 397 patients enrolled in the Studies in Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry, using mGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) as the primary outcome measure. Median age at LT was 2.2 years. Primary diagnoses were biliary atresia (44.6%), fulminant liver failure (9.8%), metabolic liver disease (16.4%), chronic cholestatic liver disease (13.1%), cryptogenic cirrhosis (4.3%) and other (11.8%). At a mean of 5.2 years post-LT, 17.6% of patients had a mGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . In univariate analysis, factors associated with this outcome were transplant center, age at LT, primary diagnosis, calculated GFR (cGFR) at LT and 12 months post-LT, primary immunosuppression, early post-LT kidney complications, age at mGFR, height and weight Z-scores at 12 months post-LT. In multivariate analysis, independent variables associated with a mGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were primary immunosuppression, age at LT, cGFR at LT and height Z-score at 12 months post-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Campbell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|