Extended Mycophenolate Mofetil Administration Beyond Day 30 in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Preemptive Therapy for Severe Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor versus calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia. A study from the ALWP of the EBMT

The association of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has increased in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Nevertheless, the use of CsA or CsA+MMF has not been reported in a large and uniform cohort. We analyzed 497 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission (CR) who underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients received a fludarabine busulfan RIC regimen and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with either CsA alone or in combination with MMF. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 27% (95% CI 21-33%) for CsA and 33% (95% CI 27-38%) for CsA+MMF (p = 0.25). The 2-year CI of chronic GvHD was 38% (95% CI 31-45%) and 33% (95% CI 28-39%) for the CsA and the CsA+MMF group, respectively (p = 0.26). On multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences with respect to relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), acute and chronic GvHD were found between the two groups, also when conducting a subgroup analysis in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) recipients. Our results support the importance of randomized trial to identify patients who could benefit from the addition of MMF in MUD HSCT.

Inferior Outcomes with Cyclosporine and Mycophenolate Mofetil after Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Combination therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), such as cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (Tac), and methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a widely used approach to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention. Data on the comparative effectiveness of MMF compared with MTX are limited and conflicting, however. We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for adult patients undergoing first myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-identical matched related donor (MRD; n = 3979) or matched unrelated donor (URD; n = 4163) using CSA+MMF, CSA+MTX, Tac+MMF, or Tac+MTX for GVHD prevention between 2000 and 2013. Within the MRD cohort, 2252 patients received CSA+MTX, 1391 received Tac+MTX, 114 received CSA+MMF, and 222 received Tac+MMF. Recipients of CSA+MMF had a higher incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24 to 2.20; P < .001) and grade III-IV (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.83; P < .001) compared with Tac+MTX. The use of CSA+MMF was also associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.73 to 3.09; P < .001) due to higher transplantation-related mortality (TRM) (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 2.61 to 6.23; P < .001) compared with Tac+MTX. Within the URD cohort, 974 patients received CSA+MTX, 2697 received Tac+MTX, 68 received CSA+MMF, and 424 received Tac+MMF. CSA+MMF was again significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.42; P <0001), worse OS (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.35; P < .001), and higher TRM (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.00 to 4.77; P < .001), compared with Tac+MTX and other regimens. Thus, this large retrospective comparison of MMF versus MTX in combination with CSA or Tac demonstrates significantly worse GVHD and survival outcomes with CSA+MMF compared with Tac+MTX.

Early lymphocyte recovery predicts clinical outcome after HSCT with mycophenolate mofetil prophylaxis in the Japanese population

Immune reconstitution affects clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and it has been suggested that lymphocyte recovery affects survival after HSCT. However, few studies have examined lymphocyte recovery in Asian patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease. We retrospectively evaluated early lymphocyte recovery after HSCT among Japanese adults who received MMF prophylaxis. Patients were divided into two groups according to their median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on day 28 after HSCT as follows: the "low ALC group" (≤ 0.22 × 10⁹ cells/L) and the "high ALC group" (> 0.22 × 10⁹ cells/L). With a median follow-up of 317 days, the high ALC group showed significantly better overall survival than the low ALC group (at 1 year: 62 vs. 46%, P = 0.02). The high ALC group also tended to have better non-relapse mortality than the low ALC group (at 1 year: 13 vs. 23%, P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in relapse rate between the high and low ALC groups (at 1 year: 29 vs. 35%, P = 0.2). We conclude that among Japanese patients who received MMF prophylaxis, ALC on day 28 after HSCT was effective in predicting overall survival and non-relapse mortality.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell-transplanted Japanese patients

PURPOSE

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is increasingly used among Japanese patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Because pharmacokinetic data for MMF in the Asian population are limited, we conducted this investigation.

METHODS

Intravenous MMF (1000 mg/dose) was administered to 10 patients along with cyclosporine or tacrolimus for 10 days after allo-SCT; it was administered every 8 h in peripheral blood stem cell- and bone marrow-transplanted patients, and every 12 h in cord blood-transplanted patients. MMF was administered orally at the same dose from day 11. Plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The MPA AUC_0 - tau was 31.9 ± 3.4, 26.2 ± 2.4, and 21.0 ± 2.2 µg*h/mL, the mean C_trough was 0.25, 0.35, and 0.37 µg/mL, and the C_max was 10.8, 9.2, and 5.5 µg/mL on days 2, 9, and 16, respectively. The AUC_0 - tau and C_max were significantly higher after intravenous MMF dosing than after oral MMF dosing. All patients exhibited successful neutrophil engraftments in a median time of 18 days. Grade II acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) of the skin was observed in two patients, and one patient developed limited chronic GvHD. Individual cases of transient and curable grade III oral mucositis and diarrhea were observed; however, MMF was not discontinued. No other severe complications or infections were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenously administered MMF was safe and possibly effective in achieving higher MPA plasma concentrations for GvHD prophylaxis after allo-SCT in Japanese patients.

High incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in a large cohort of related and unrelated allogeneic transplantation patients

Both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The optimal pharmacological regimen for GVHD prophylaxis is unclear, but combinations of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporin or tacrolimus [Tac]) and an antimetabolite (methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) are typically used. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 414 consecutive patients who underwent AHSCT from sibling (SD) or unrelated donors (UD) with Tac/MMF combination, between January 2005 and August 2010. The median follow-up was 60 months. Less than one third of the patients received a reduced-intensity chemoregimen. The incidence of grades III and IV acute GVHD was 22.3% and 36.5% in SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0007). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 47.1% and 52.7% in the SD and UD groups, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 60 months was 33.3% and 46.5% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0016). The incidence of relapse was 22.4% for UD and 28.8% for SD. Five-year overall survival was 43% and 34% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0183). GVHD was the leading cause of death for the entire cohort. Multivariable analysis showed that 8/8 HLA match, patient's age < 60, and low-risk disease were associated with better survival. The use of Tac/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with a relatively high incidence of severe acute GVHD and NRM in AHSCT from sibling and unrelated donors.

Combination of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis in unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We report the results of HLA-matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation with new GVHD prophylaxis regimen consisted of cyclosporine, methotrexate and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in 139 patients with hematologic malignancies. The incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 43.0% and 17.3%, respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD was 42.1%, with 16.5% extensive grade. The cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality at 100 days and 3 years were 7.9% and 29.7%, respectively. Three-year overall survival, disease-free survival and relapse incidence were 58.7%, 55.3% and 19.6%, respectively. These results suggest the new regime may be effective for the prophylaxis of acute and chronic GVHD in unrelated donor transplantation.

Successful neutrophil engraftment by reduced use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), most physicians in Japan utilize granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a high dose (HD) of 300 μg/m(2) per day for filgrastim to promote faster neutrophil engraftment. However, the necessity of the HD has not been validated under graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which can also be expected to facilitate engraftment. In a total of 51 patients, we compared the clinical outcomes between a standard dose (SD) fixed at 300 μg per day and a HD of G-CSF. While time to neutrophil engraftment was not different in the HD and SD groups in patients receiving cord blood transplantation (CBT, 20 vs. 17.5 days, P = 0.243) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT, 11 vs. 10 days, P = 0.227), there seemed to be an increased risk of developing acute GVHD in the HD group with CBT (20 vs. 0%, P = 0.073) and BMT (57 vs. 24%, P = 0.165). Progression-free survival of patients in the HD group was likely to be worse compared with that of the SD group with CBT (P = 0.099). In this study, the clinical benefits of a HD of G-CSF could not be documented, and we find that the use of G-CSF at a SD after allo-SCT with MMF should be prospectively evaluated.