The Benefits of Interferon Treatment in Patients Without Sustained Viral Response After Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C

Triple therapy using direct-acting agents for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C viral graft reinfection is almost a universal event after liver transplantation with consequent disease progression.

METHODS

We applied triple therapy (n = 21) with the use of telaprevir (TVR; n = 12) or simeprevir (SVR; n = 9).

RESULTS

TVR was given at the dose 1,500 mg daily (n = 11) with reduced dose of cyclosporine at 25% to 50%, and SVR was given at the dose 100 mg daily with unadjusted cyclosporine, followed by 12 weeks of dual therapy. The early viral response was achieved in 91.7% (n = 11), end of treatment response rate was 91.7% (n = 11), and sustained viral response rate was 83.3% (n = 10) in the TVR group, and respective rates were 88.9% (n = 8), 77.8% (n = 7), and 77.8% (n = 7) in the SVR group. Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not given in the patients with triple therapy, blood transfusion was performed in 7 cases (58.3%) in the TVR group and 1 case (11.1%) in the SVR group. Interferon-mediated graft dysfunction was observed in 4 cases (33.3%) in the TVR group and 3 cases (33.3%) in the SVR group, respectively. The cumulative viral clearance rates in triple (n = 21) and dual (n = 105) therapy were 95.0% and 18.1% at 12 weeks, and 95.0% and 40.0%, respectively, at 24 weeks (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although careful monitoring for possible adverse events is required during treatment, triple therapy with the use of direct-acting agents are very effective in treating hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

rs8099917 and viral genotyping as indications for living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Appropriate antiviral treatment is essential for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to be effective for treating hepatitis C. However, it has never been reported that pre-LDLT genetic analyses of both host and virus, with prediction of the outcome of post-LDLT antiviral treatment, indicated LDLT for a borderline case.

CASE REPORT

We have reported the case of a 68-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis caused by genotype 1b hepatitis C, a history of ruptured esophageal varices, and adequately controlled minor ascites. Her liver function was classified as Child-Pugh grade B. The donor was a 42-year-old woman with an estimated left lobe graft volume (GV) of 33.8% based on the standard liver volume of the recipient. Molecular analyses used to confirm the indication of LDLT for this combination revealed the following: The rs8099917 genotype was T/T in the donor and recipient, the HCV core protein was double wild type, there were no mutations in the interferon sensitivity-determining region, and 8 mutations were found in the interferon/ribavirin resistance-determining region. LDLT was performed because very high sensitivity to interferon treatment was predicted.

DISCUSSION

Six months after LDLT and uneventful post-LDLT courses, pegylated interferon-α2a and ribavirin were administered under immunosuppression with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. This regimen was continued for 48 weeks, resulting in a viral response at 10 weeks and a sustained viral response, as predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported the usefulness of molecular analyses of host and viral factors for indicating LDLT to treat hepatitis C in a borderline case.

Management of recurrent hepatitis C in orthotopic liver transplant recipients

End-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma from chronic hepatitis C are the most common indications for orthotopic liver transplantation and the incidence of both are projected to increase over the next decade. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection of the allograft is associated with an accelerated progression to cirrhosis, graft loss, and death. This article presents an overview of the natural history of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplant recipients and guidance on optimal management strategies.

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post liver transplantation: impact of choice of calcineurin inhibitor

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C is universal. After LT, hepatitis C is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. Furthermore, responses to antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are consistently sub-optimal. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) like cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus continue to dominate immunosuppressive regimens in this population; however, there is still uncertainty as to whether either offers an advantage in terms of patient outcomes. Although tacrolimus demonstrates improved efficacy in the general LT population, differences have begun to emerge between these agents regarding diabetogenic potential, antiviral activity, and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C. This review critically evaluates the existing literature, providing an overview of the reported differences, concluding that despite conflicting evidence, a potential benefit of CsA in patients with hepatitis C is supported by the data and warrants further investigation. Future studies examining the role of CNIs in hepatitis C virus-positive LT recipients are required to accurately examine the effects of CNIs on outcomes such as fibrosis progression, survival, and effects on response to antiviral therapy, to provide robust information that allows clinicians to make an informed choice concerning which CNI is best for their patients.

Living-donor liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompression. In areas with low deceased-donor organ availability like Japan, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is similarly indicated for HCV cirrhosis as deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries and accepted as an established treatment for HCV-cirrhosis, and the results are equivalent to those of DDLT. To prevent graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C, antiviral treatment with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. In contrast to DDLT, many Japanese LDLT centers have reported modified treatment regimens as best efforts to secure first graft, such as aggressive preemptive antiviral treatment, escalation of dosages, and elongation of treatment duration.

Efficacy of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C after liver transplantation with cyclosporine and tacrolimus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cyclosporine A (CSA), but not tacrolimus (TAC), inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in vitro. Clinical reports on the efficacy of interferon-α (IFNα)-based antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent HCV after liver transplantation (LT) with CSA and TAC are conflicting. Our aim was to assess whether AVT for recurrent HCV after LT is more effective with CSA or TAC. We performed an electronic database search (1995-2012) and a manual abstract search (2005-2012). The a priori defined eligibility criteria included the use of AVT for recurrent HCV with IFN (standard or pegylated) and ribavirin and the reporting of sustained virological response (SVR) rates with CSA and TAC (the primary outcome). Two authors identified and extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a random effects model. In all, 5058 references were retrieved, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 17 observational studies (13 full-text articles) met the eligibility criteria; the meta-analysis was based on the latter studies. The pooled SVR rates were 42% (395/945) with CSA and 35% (471/1364) with TAC (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00-1.39, P = 0.05). Although the pooled data contained significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 45%, P = 0.02), the SVR rates in the RCT were comparable (39% with CSA and 35% with TAC). Limiting the analysis to the 7 studies reporting on 40 or more patients in each group (with 1634 patients in all) favored CSA (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.09-1.38, P < 0.001), and heterogeneity disappeared (I(2) = 0%, P = 0.62). In conclusion, IFN-based AVT for recurrent HCV after LT seems marginally more effective with CSA versus TAC; the study heterogeneity, however, limits firm conclusions.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma related to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are currently the most common indications for liver transplantation. The number of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) procedures has increased given the shortage of donor organs from deceased donors. However, recurrence of HCV infection is universal and affects graft survival. This mini-review compared the outcomes for HCV-positive recipients after LDLT with those after deceased donor liver transplantation.

Long-term antiviral treatment for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of patients treated for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation and not achieving virological response following treatment with interferon plus ribavirin is controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 70 patients non-responders to antiviral treatment after liver transplantation was performed. Twenty-one patients (30.0%; Group A) were treated for ≤ 12 months and 49 (70.0%; Group B) for more than 12 months.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable for main demographic, clinical and pathological variables. Median duration of antiviral treatment was 8.2 months in Group A and 33.4 months in Group B. No patient achieved a complete virological response. The 5-year patient hepatitis C-related survival rate was 49.2% in Group A and 88.3% in Group B (P=0.002), while the 5-year graft survival rate was 49.2% in Group A and 85.9% in Group B (P=0.007). The median yearly fibrosis progression rate was 1.21 per year in Group A and 0.40 per year in Group B (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged antiviral treatment showed an overall beneficial effect in transplanted patients with a recurrent hepatitis C infection and not responding to conventional therapy. The treatment should be continued as long as it is permitted, in order to improve clinical and histological outcomes.

Chronic hepatitis C and antiviral treatment regimens: where can psychology contribute?

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to evaluate the existing literature on psychological, social, and behavioral aspects of chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection and antiviral treatment; provide the state of the behavioral science in areas that presently hinder HCV-related health outcomes; and make recommendations for areas in which clinical psychology can make significant contributions.

METHOD

The extant literature on HCV and antiviral therapy was reviewed as related to biopsychosocial factors such as mental health, substance/alcohol use, quality of life, coping, stigma, racial disparities, side effects, treatment adherence, integrated care, and psychological interventions.

RESULTS

For reasons that have not been well elucidated, individuals infected with HCV experience psychological and somatic problems and report poor health-related quality of life. Preexisting conditions, including poor mental health and alcohol/substance use, can interfere with access to and successful completion of HCV treatment. Perceived stigma is highly prevalent and associated with psychological distress. Racial disparities exist for HCV prevalence, treatment uptake, and treatment success. During HCV treatment, patients experience exacerbation of symptoms, treatment side effects, and poorer quality of life, making it difficult to complete treatment. Despite pharmacological advances in HCV treatment, improvements in clinical and public health outcomes have not been realized. The reasons for this lack of impact are multifactorial, but include suboptimal referral and access to care for many patients, treatment-related side effects, treatment nonadherence, and lack of empirically based approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomedical advances in HCV and antiviral treatment have created a fertile field in which psychologists are uniquely positioned to make important contributions to HCV management and treatment.

Efficacy of splenectomy in preventing anemia in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation is not dependent on inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase genotype

AIM

  A genetic polymorphism of inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) has been associated with pegylated-interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV)-induced anemia in chronic hepatitis C patients. However, correlation of the genetic variant with anemia following liver transplantation has not been determined.

METHODS

  Sixty-three hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients who underwent liver transplantation and PEG-IFN/RBV therapy were enrolled. The rs1127354 was determined for each individual.

RESULTS

  There was no relationship with anemia or RBV dosage in patients carrying the CC allele (CC group, n = 43) and those carrying the CA allele (CA group, n = 20). The incidence of hemoglobin (Hb) decline >3 g/dL (CC: 4.7%, CA: 0%) was relatively low, whereas the incidence of Hb levels <10 g/dL (CC: 18.6%, CA: 30.0%) was high. Univariate analysis revealed that splenectomy inversely correlated with Hb levels <10 g/dL at 4 weeks (P = 0.04). Among the 22 patients who did not undergo splenectomy, the incidence of Hb levels <10 g/dL tended to be lower in the seven patients carrying the CA allele (28.6%) than in the 15 patients with the CC allele (60.0%).

CONCLUSION

  The ITPA genetic polymorphism does not correlate with post-transplant PEG-IFN/RBV-induced anemia. Splenectomy is useful in preventing anemia regardless of the ITPA genotype.

Variants in IL28B in liver recipients and donors correlate with response to peg-interferon and ribavirin therapy for recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease frequently undergo orthotopic liver transplantation, but recurrent hepatitis C is still a major cause of morbidity. Patients are treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV), which has substantial side effects and is costly. We investigated genetic factors of host, liver donor, and virus that might predict sensitivity of patients with recurrent hepatitis C to PEG-IFN/RBV.

METHODS

Liver samples were analyzed from 67 HCV-infected recipients and 41 liver donors. Liver recipient and donor DNA samples were screened for single nucleotide polymorphisms near the IL28B genes (rs12980275 and rs8099917) that affect sensitivity to PEG-IFN/RBV. HCV RNA was isolated from patients and analyzed for mutations in the core, the IFN sensitivity-determining region, and IFN/RBV resistance-determining regions in nonstructural protein 5A.

RESULTS

In liver recipients and donors, the IL28B single nucleotide polymorphism rs8099917 was significantly associated with a sustained viral response (SVR; P = 0.003 and P = .025, respectively). Intrahepatic expression of IL28 messenger RNA was significantly lower in recipients and donors that carried the minor alleles (T/G or T/T) in rs8099917 (P = .010 and .009, respectively). Genetic analyses of IL28B in patients and donors and of the core and nonstructural protein 5A regions encoded by HCV RNA predicted an SVR with 83% sensitivity and 82% specificity; this was more effective than analysis of any single genetic feature.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent HCV infection after orthotopic liver transplantation, combination analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms of IL28B in recipient and donor tissues and mutations in HCV RNA allow prediction of SVR to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.