Evolution of causes of mortality in renal transplantation in the last 10 years

Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein measured prior to transplant is related to prediabetes in first-year kidney transplant recipients: A single-center cross-sectional study in Vietnam

AIM

To determine the rate of prediabetes among and the pre-transplant plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) value predictive of prediabetes in patients during their first year post-living donor kidney transplant.

METHODS

A total of 538 patients underwent living donor kidney transplantation between January 2018 and December 2020, 413 of whom met the inclusion criteria for this study. All patients underwent oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) with 75 g glucose/200 mL solution, starting 3 months post-transplant and repeating the test every 3 months for the first year. Clinical and paraclinical indicators and plasma hs-CRP concentrations were quantified the day prior to the transplant. Prediabetes was diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association 2018 criteria as a 2-h OGTT result between 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) and 199 mg/dL (11.0 mmol/L).

RESULTS

The rate of prediabetes among the study subjects was 38.3 % (158/413). Body mass index (BMI) and pre-transplant plasma triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and hs-CRP levels were related factors predictive of prediabetes in patients within the first year post-kidney transplant based on multivariate logistic regression and receiver operative characteristic curve models. Hs-CRP was the factor with the best predictive value (area under the curve = 0.89; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant plasma hs-CRP levels were a good predictor of prediabetes in the first year post-living donor kidney transplant.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background and objectives: New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) represents a primary cause of morbidity and allograft loss. We assessed prevalence and risk factors for NODAT in a population of Italian kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Methods: Data from 522 KT performed between January 2004 and December 2014 were analyzed. Participants underwent clinical examination; blood and urine laboratory tests were obtained at baseline, one, six, and 12-month of follow-up to detect glucose homeostasis abnormalities and associated metabolic disorders. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at six months in 303 subjects. Results: Most patients were Caucasian (82.4%) with a mean age of 48 ± 12 years. The prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism (AGM) and NODAT was 12.6% and 10.7%, respectively. Comparing characteristics of patients with normal glucose metabolism (NGM) to those with NODAT, we found a significant difference in living donation (16.6% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.03) and age at transplant (46 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 9 years; p = 0.0001). Also, we observed that patients developing NODAT had received higher cumulative steroid doses (1-month: 1165 ± 593 mg vs. 904 ± 427 mg; p = 0.002; 6-month:2194 ± 1159 mg vs. 1940 ± 744 mg; p = 0.002). The NODAT group showed inferior allograft function compared to patients with NGM (1-year eGFR: 50.1 ± 16.5 vs. 57 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.02). NODAT patients were more likely to exhibit elevated systolic blood pressure and higher total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than controls. Conclusions: The prevalence of NODAT in our cohort was relatively high. Patient age and early post-transplant events such as steroid abuse are associated with NODAT development.

New-Onset Diabetes after Kidney Transplantation

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a frequent complication in kidney allograft recipients. It may be caused by modifiable and non-modifiable factors. The non-modifiable factors are the same that may lead to the development of type 2 diabetes in the general population, whilst the modifiable factors include peri-operative stress, hepatitis C or cytomegalovirus infection, vitamin D deficiency, hypomagnesemia, and immunosuppressive medications such as glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus more than cyclosporine), and mTOR inhibitors. The most worrying complication of NODAT are major adverse cardiovascular events which represent a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients. However, NODAT may also result in progressive diabetic kidney disease and is frequently associated with microvascular complications, eventually determining blindness or amputation. Preventive measures for NODAT include a careful assessment of glucose tolerance before transplantation, loss of over-weight, lifestyle modification, reduced caloric intake, and physical exercise. Concomitant measures include aggressive control of systemic blood pressure and lipids levels to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Hypomagnesemia and low levels of vitamin D should be corrected. Immunosuppressive strategies limiting the use of diabetogenic drugs are encouraged. Many hypoglycemic drugs are available and may be used in combination with metformin in difficult cases. In patients requiring insulin treatment, the dose and type of insulin should be decided on an individual basis as insulin requirements depend on the patient's diet, amount of exercise, and renal function.

Impact of cardiovascular risk stratification strategies in kidney transplantation over time

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients exhibit a dramatically increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. In 2007, Austrian centres implemented a consensus of comprehensive CV screening programme prior to kidney transplantation (KT). The consensus placed a particular emphasis on screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) with cardiac computed tomography (CT) or coronary angiography (CAG) in patients with diabetes mellitus, known CAD or those having multiple conventional CV risk factors. Here, we investigate if this affected risk stratification and post-transplant CV outcomes.

METHODS

In a retrospective chart review, we evaluated 551 KTs performed from 2003 to 2015 in our centre. Patients were categorized into three groups: KT before (2003-07), directly after (2008-11) and 5 years after (2012-15) implementation of the consensus. We analysed clinical characteristics, the rate of cardiac CTs and CAGs prior to KT as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during a 2-year follow-up after KT.

RESULTS

The three study groups showed a homogeneous distribution of comorbidities and age. Significantly more cardiac CTs (13.6% versus 10.2% versus 44.8%; P = 0.002) and CAGs (39.6% versus 43.9% versus 56.2%; P = 0.003) were performed after the consensus. Coronary interventions were performed during 42 out of 260 CAGs (16.2%), the cumulative 2-year MACE incidence was 8.7%. Regarding MACE occurrence, no significant difference between the three groups was found.

CONCLUSION

CV risk stratification has become more rigorous and invasive after the implementation of the consensus; however, this was not associated with an improvement in CV outcome.

Obesity and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death in people without chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the effect of obesity in people with CKD is uncertain.

Methods

Medline and Embase (from inception to January 2015) were searched for cohort studies measuring obesity by body mass index (BMI), waist:hip ratio (WHR) and/or waist circumference (WC) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality or events in patients with any stage of CKD. Data were summarized using random effects models. Meta-regression was conducted to assess sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Of 4065 potentially eligible citations, 165 studies ( n = 1 534 845 participants) were analyzed. In studies that found a nonlinear relationship, underweight people with CKD (3-5) on hemodialysis experienced an increased risk of death compared with those with normal weight. In transplant recipients, excess risk was observed at levels of morbid obesity (>35 kg/m 2 ). Of studies that found the relationship to be linear, a 1 kg/m 2 increase in BMI was associated with a 3 and 4% reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients on hemodialysis, respectively {adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-0.98] and adjusted HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-1.00)}. In CKD Stages 3-5, for every 1 kg/m 2 increase in BMI there was a 1% reduction in all-cause mortality [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.0.97-1.00)]. There was no apparent association between obesity and mortality in transplanted patients or those on peritoneal dialysis. Sparse data for WHR and WC did not allow further analyses.

Conclusions

Being obese may be protective for all-cause mortality in the predialysis and hemodialysis populations, while being underweight suggests increased risk, but not in transplant recipients.

[The management of lung transplantation candidates. A case series]

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LT) is associated with an increased risk of infection, cancer, chronic renal failure, cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. Some risk factors precede transplantation and could benefit for early diagnosis and optimised care.

METHODS

The incidence of comorbidities and their treatment before referral were assessed in 157 consecutive lung transplant candidates between 2008 and 2011.

RESULTS

The median age was 37years [25; 51]. Fifty-six percent had a body mass index below 19kg/m(2). In the COPD group, only 50 % had undergone a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the preceding 2 years. Osteoporosis was present in 42 %, of whom 36 % were on bisphophonate therapy. Vitamin D deficiency was present in 65 %. Previously undiagnosed cardiovascular risk factors were discovered during LT assessment: hypertension in one patient, hypercholesterolemia in 6 % and diabetes in 4 %. Poor dental condition necessitating extractions were found in 41 % of patients. Protective anti-HBs antibodies levels were present in 50 % of the patients at the time of referral.

CONCLUSION

The assessment and early treatment of nutritional disorders, osteoporosis and risk factors for infection as well as addressing associated cardiovascular risk factors should be optimised in the care of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. The potential for becoming a lung transplant candidate in the future should be kept in mind early in the global management of those patients.

The reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy after renal transplantation is not influenced by the immunosuppressive regimen

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the first cause of death after kidney transplantation. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is one of the main CV risk factors. It has been reported that the antiproliferative properties of everolimus (EVE) treatment may decrease left ventricular mass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of LVH in two groups of kidney transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive treatment with low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) + EVE or CNI + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

METHODS

We evaluated 104 patients of mean age 47.5 ± 13.1 years who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2006 and December 2009 pretransplant by echocardiography, which was repeated every year for 3 years during which all patients continued the initial therapy. Over the 3-year period 76 subjects were treated with MMF, and 28 with EVE. We recorded left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), interventricular septum thickness in diastole (IVSTD), left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole (LVPWD), left ventricular end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume during the follow-up echocardiographic evaluations.

RESULTS

No differences in the evolution of the echocardiographic parameters were observed between the two groups-MMF versus EVE group: LVEDD, 50.3 ± 5.1 versus 51.2 ± 6.7 mm; IVSTD, 11.2 ± 1.9 versus 11.3 ± 2 mm; LVPWD, 10.2 ± 1.9 versus 10.5 ± 1.7 mm; relative wall thickness, 0.041 ± 0.08 versus 0.42 ± 0.08; ejection fraction, 63 ± 6% versus 61 ± 5%; and left ventricular mass index, 113 ± 28.9 versus 121.9 ± 39.4 g/m(2), respectively. Compared with pretransplant echocardiographic evaluations, similar reductions in left ventricular mass index were noted in both groups after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that after renal transplantation there was a reduction of the LVH respect to the pretransplant dialytic status. The two immunosuppressive regimen did not influence the evolution of post-transplant LVH.

[Evaluation of patients' readiness for surgery when called from the waiting list for kidney transplantation: experience of the Budapest Centre]

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the establishment of waiting list committee on recipient evaluation for kidney transplantation. Studies on this issue have not been previously reported.

METHODS

Data of 714 patients were collected between September 1, 2007 and April 20, 2010. Of the 714 patients 354 were transplanted. Data from the first 16 months period were compared to those obtained during the second 16 months period.

RESULTS

During the first period 171 patients (47.9%) were unfit for transplantation [129 patients (36.1%) were refused after telephone information and 42 patients (11.8%) after clinical investigation]. During the second period 141 (39.5%) patients were found to be unsuitable [80 patients (22.4%) after telephone information and 61 patients (17.1)] after clinical examination. During the two periods of the study 44% of patients were unfit for transplantation. A considerable number of patients were refused because of cardiologic reasons. The percent of fit patients was 52.1% in the first period and 60.5% in the second period. In addition, the percent of unfit patients who were unsuitable for kidney transplantation after telephone information decreased from 36.1% to 22.4%, while the percent of unfit patients after clinical evaluation increased from 11.% to 17.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Authors conclude that waiting list committee made an effective work.