Successful kidney transplantation after desensitization using plasmapheresis, low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab in highly sensitized patients: a single-center experience

Functional and phenotypic profiles of HLA-specific antibodies in relation to antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR). However, not all DSAs are pathogenic, and patients that raise DSAs have a wide spectrum of outcomes ranging from the complete absence of graft injury to severe AMR. Hence, characterization of both the qualitative features and titer of DSAs has the potential to predict AMR risk and treatment outcome for sensitized patients. Here, using HLA-A2+ cell-based assays, we investigate the qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc receptor binding properties and Fc-mediated effector function over time. Compared to seronegative controls, reactive antibodies in seropositive participants were predominantly IgG1, and exhibited elevated levels of binding to the receptors involved in Antibody Dependent Cellular Phagocytosis (ADCP) and Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity. Further analysis of seropositive individuals revealed that these activities were predictive ofAMR status. Collectively, these results suggest a role for phagocytic and cytotoxic antibody effector functions of DSA in contributing to graft injury.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients Treated with Intravenous Immuno-Globulin, Plasmapheresis and Rituximab: A Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible transplantation for patients who received desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), plasmapheresis, and rituximab. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies that utilized desensitization was conducted. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates and the 95% confidence interval (CI). (3) Results: A total of 1517 studies were initially identified. From these, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 459 patients, with a mean age of 45 years, of whom 40.8% were male. CDC crossmatch was positive in 68.3% (95% CI: 43.5-85.8; I2 87%), and 89.4% (95% CI: 53.4-98.4%; I2 89.8%) underwent living-donor transplantation. The 1-year graft survival pooled rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 84.8-92; I2 0%) and the 5-year graft survival rate was 86.1% (95% CI: 81.2-89.9; I2 0%). The 1-year patient survival rate was 94.2% (95% CI: 91-96.3; I2 0%), and the 5-year patient survival rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 83.5-92.7%; I2 7.7%). The rate of antibody-mediated rejection was 37.7% (95% CI: 25-52.3; I2 80.3%), and the rate of acute cell-mediated rejection was 15.1% (95% CI: 9.1-24; I2 55%). (4) Conclusions: Graft and patient survival are favorable in highly sensitized patients who undergo desensitization using IVIg, plasmapheresis, and rituximab for HLA-incompatible transplantation.

Glycolysis Changes in Alloreactive Memory B Cells in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Desensitization Therapy

Despite the growing use of desensitization strategies, hyperimmune patients remain at high risk of antibody-mediated rejection suggesting that, even when donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are effectively depleted, anti-donor specific B cells persist. We included 10 highly sensitized recipients that underwent desensitization with plasmapheresis and B cell depletion prior to kidney transplantation. We quantified changes in DSA (luminex), total B-cell subsets (flow cytometry), anti-donor HLA B cells (fluorospot), and single-cell metabolism in serially collected samples before desensitization, at the time of transplant, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Desensitization was associated with a decrease in DSA and total memory B cell and naive B cell percentage, while plasma cells and memory anti-donor HLA circulating B cells persisted up to 12 months after transplant. At 12-month post-transplantation, memory B cells increased their glycolytic capacity, while proliferative KI67+ plasma cells modified their metabolism by increasing fatty acid and amino acid oxidation capacity and decreasing their glucose dependence. Despite effective DSA depletion, anti-donor B cells persist in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the reliance of these cells on glycolysis, glycolysis-targeting therapies might represent a valuable treatment strategy.

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-HLA-Cw and Anti-HLA-DP Antibodies on Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Given the risk of rejection, the presence of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) contraindicates transplantation in most allocation systems. However, HLA-Cw and -DP DSA escape this censorship. We performed a multicentric observational study, in which the objective was to determinate risk factors of acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR) in recipients transplanted with preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA. Between 2010 and 2019, 183 patients were transplanted with a preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA (92 Cw-DSA; 91 DP-DSA). At 2 years, the incidence of aABMR was 12% in the Cw-DSA group, versus 28% in the DP-DSA group. Using multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of a preformed DP-DSA was associated with an increased risk of aABMR (HR = 2.32 [1.21-4.45 (p = 0.001)]) compared with Cw-DSA. We also observed a significant association between the DSA's MFI on the day of transplant and the risk of aABMR (HR = 1.09 [1.08-1.18], p = 0.032), whatever the DSA was. Interaction term analysis found an increased risk of aABMR in the DP-DSA group compared with Cw-DSA, but only for MFI below 3,000. These results may plead for taking these antibodies into account in the allocation algorithms, in the same way as other DSA.

Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Kidney Transplant Candidates

Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.

Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS

We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes.

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.

Therapeutic Effect of Plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Recipients of Kidney Transplant With High Panel-reactive Antibody Levels: A Single-center Experience

OBJECTIVE

High panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels limit patients' access to kidney transplantation from potential living donor candidates and decrease renal graft survival by causing acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR). In this article, we report our experiences about the efficiency of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in reduction of serum PRA levels in candidates for renal transplantation and in patients with AAMR.

METHODS

We examined retrospectively 47 patients with high PRA levels (18 for desensitization (DS) and 29 with AAMR) at Ankara University. The reduction in PRA class 1 and PRA class 2 levels before and after the PP, IVIG, and rituximab or eculizumab therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the DS group, mean reduction in PRA class I ± SD was 28.0 ± 9.10 to 22.1 ± 8.14 (P <.05), and mean reduction in PRA class II ± SD was 40.3 ± 6.89 to 32.2 ± 5.68 (P < .05). In the AAMR group; mean reduction in PRA class I ± SD was 23.9 ± 9.56 to 17.8 ± 8.64 (P > .05), and mean reduction in PRA class II ± SD was 28.1 ± 8.37 to 26.7 ± 7.96 (P > .05). In total, mean reduction in PRA class I was 25.7 ± 6.66 to 19.7 ± 6.00 (P < .01). Mean reduction in PRA class II was 33.8 ± 5.93 to 29.2 ± 4.96 (P > .05). In the DS group, 3 (16.7%) patients were treated with rituximab. In the AAMR group, 9 (31.0%) patients were treated with rituximab, and 1 (5.5%) patient received eculizimab.In the DS group, the mean follow-up period in years ± SD was 5.06 ± 3.01 and no patient had graft loss. In the AAMR group, the mean follow-up period in years was 5.06 ± 2.74 and 6 (33.3%) patients had graft loss with acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

PP and IVIG treatment provide significant reduction in PRA levels and can be used in DS protocols.

Prognostic value of C3d-fixing, preformed donor-specific antibodies in crossmatch-positive living kidney transplantation

The occurrence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is higher in flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM)-positive patients despite desensitization. Accumulating evidence suggests a correlation between the complement-binding ability of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and the risk of ABMR. Here, we investigated the correlation between complement C3d-fixing ability of preformed DSA and ABMR risk, the efficacy of a desensitization protocol for patients with C3d-fixing DSA, and the risk of ABMR in 21 DSA- and FCXM-positive patients. We retrospectively analyzed the C3d-fixing ability and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of preformed DSA before and after desensitization. Six patients had non-C3d-fixing DSA and 15 had C3d-fixing DSA. The presence of C3d-fixing DSA before desensitization was correlated with the incidence of acute ABMR within 1 year after transplantation (p = .04) and chronic ABMR (p = .03). Moreover, the MFI of preformed DSA differed between responder and non-responder C3d-fixing DSA after desensitization (p < .0001). The C3d-fixing ability of preformed DSA with low MFI disappeared after desensitization. These results indicate that measuring DSA C3d-fixing ability may identify patients with a high risk of ABMR, especially before desensitization. CLINICAL TRIAL NOTATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) number: UMIN000033449.

Outcome of the risk-stratified desensitization protocol in donor-specific antibody-positive living kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study

Acceptable outcomes of donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive living kidney transplantation (LKT) have recently been reported. However, LKT in crossmatch (XM)-positive patients remains at high-risk and requires an optimal desensitization protocol. We report our intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT vs. XM-negative LKT in patients who underwent LKT between January 2012 and June 2015 in our institution. The rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) within 90 days postoperation, graft function, and patient, and graft survival rates at 4 years were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups: XM-DSA- (n = 229), XM-DSA+ (n = 36), and XM + DSA+ (n = 15). The XM + DSA+ group patients underwent desensitization with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. The rates of ABMR within 90 days in the XM-DSA-, XM-DSA+, and XM + DSA+ groups were 1.3%, 9.4%, and 60.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the graft function throughout the observational period, the 4-year patient or graft survival rates among three groups. This study showed that intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT were comparable to XM-negative LKT. However, our current desensitization protocol cannot avert ABMR within 90 days, and XM positivity is still a significant risk factor for ABMR. Further refinement of the current desensitization regimen is required.

Association Between Cytokines and Their Receptor Antagonist Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical Risk Factors and Acute Rejection Following Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND Acute rejection (AR) after renal transplantation affects both patient and graft survival. There is growing evidence of the genetic association between cytokine or its receptor antagonist and AR in solid organ transplantation. The objectives of this study were to investigate the role of recipient TNF β, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra) gene polymorphism, as well as traditional clinical variables such as panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels, donor type, and HLA mismatches in AR following renal transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS TNF β (+252A/G), IL-10 (-592A/C), IL-1β (-511C/T) and IL-1ra (86 bp VNTR) gene polymorphisms were determined in 195 renal allograft recipients with and without AR, using PCR. Both these genotypic variants and clinical risk factors were investigated for correlation with AR within the first year after renal transplantation. RESULTS Patients with increased pre-transplant PRA levels (P<0.001) and donor type (P=0.012) were prone to the development of AR. After adjusting for all variables of P<0.2, a PRA level >10% (OR=4.515, 95% confidence intervals=1.738-11.727, P=0.002) and the receipt of a graft from a donation after cardiac death (DCD) donor (OR=2.437, 95% confidence intervals=1.047-5.673, P=0.039) remained significantly associated with AR in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. No correlation could be found between recipients with an episode and absence of acute rejection and the gene polymorphisms of these cytokines investigated in the present study. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the presence of increased pre-transplant levels of PRA and the receipt of a graft from DCD donor other than cytokine gene polymorphisms are significant risk factors for AR in renal transplantation. To reduce the occurrence of AR, clinicians should take necessary measures to lower the PRA levels and pay more attention to patients who received a graft from a DCD donor.

[Renal transplantation in recipients with moderate presensitization]

AIM

to comparatively assess desensitization schemes with and without plasmapheresis in patients with low presensitization.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The investigators studied the efficiency of the two desensitization schemes (cascade plasma filtration + intravenous immunoglobulin used in a dose of 100 mg/kg in 19 patients (a study group; panel reactive antibodies (PRA) 25.1±6.1%) versus 2 g/kg in 23 patients (a comparison group, PRA 18.9±4.4%). The crossmatch reaction was negative in both groups. The median follow-up period was 23.5 (quartiles 1 and 3: 10.25 and 26) months.

RESULTS

The study group was noted to have 6 episodes of acute rejection and 1 episode of infection; the comparison group had 13 and 3 episodes, respectively. The overall renal graft survival was 79 and 65% in the study and comparison groups, respectively; the 1-year graft survival was 94 and 62%. Graft function was significantly better in the study group: there was a lower daily proteinuria level (p<0.001) at 3 months after transplantation; a higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p=0.001) and a lower daily proteinuria level (p=0.01) at 6 months; a lower serum creatinine comcentration (p=0.001) and lower daily proteinuria (p=0.001) and a higher GFR (p=0.001) at one year.

CONCLUSION

Even with the relatively low level of sensitization, there is an increase in the frequency of acute rejection episodes and worse graft function. The efficiency of desensitization using cascade plasma filtration and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin is higher than that with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin.

Desensitization Before Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients represents a major clinical challenge leading to long periods on the waiting list. When a living donor is available, the use of different strategies to desensitize recipients with preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies can allow a successful transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study including all living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) with desensitization (DS) from 2008 to 2014 in our transplant unit. The rates of rejection and graft survival were evaluated. DS consisted of plasma exchange (PE), rituximab (RTX), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) induction with thymoglobulin and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2014, we performed 368 LDKT, with 31 receiving desensitization. Seven cases from a clinical trial were excluded. Demographic data and outcomes were recorded. All of the patients received RTX + PE + IVIG. DS was performed for positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match (4.2%), T-cell- and/or B-cell-positive flow cytometry cross-match (87.5%) and presence of donor-specific antibodies alone (8.3%). We identified 23 episodes of rejection in 12 patients (50%); 79% were antibody-mediated rejections (AMR). Graft failure was 12.5%, with a mean time to graft loss of 229 ± 203 days. Mean follow-up was 37 ± 27 months, and graft survival was 91% and 86% at 1 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Desensitization in LDKT appears to offer an acceptable option for highly sensitized patients. In our series, 41% presented an AMR and 12.5% showed transplant glomerulopathy in protocol and/or indication biopsies. However, short-term outcomes and graft survival were satisfactory.

Acute rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute rejection is the most common complication after vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). This review provides a state-of-the-art analysis of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute rejection episodes and highlights recent findings with the potential to improve patient care and enhance understanding of the underlying biologic processes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports suggest that maintenance immunosuppression dose reduction and steroid withdrawal are realistic goals in VCA, despite the known high immunogenicity of the skin component. It appears that utilization of sentinel flaps, in-depth histological analyses and application of novel biomarkers have facilitated early diagnosis and characterization of acute rejection episodes, leading to timely institution of appropriate therapy. The successful management of the first highly sensitized face transplant recipient suggests the possibility of carefully considering these high-risk VCA candidates for transplantation.

SUMMARY

Acute rejection is higher in VCA than in any other organ in the field of transplantation, although most episodes are controlled by high-dose steroids and optimization of maintenance immunosuppression. Because of limitations in patient number and the duration of follow-up, the long-term safety and effectiveness of VCA remain unclear. Moreover, the tests currently used to diagnose acute rejection are of limited value. Better diagnostic tools and a better understanding of the immunologic events during acute rejection are therefore needed to improve diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of this life-changing restorative surgery.

Transplantation: rituximab induction for prevention of HLA-antibody rebound

Desensitization therapy enables HLA-incompatible transplantation. However, desensitized patients have an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, and the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is associated with poor outcomes. A new study has assessed the effect of rituximab induction on DSA production in kidney transplant recipients with high immunological risk.

Desensitization for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Desensitization protocols are being used worldwide to enable kidney transplantation across immunologic barriers, i.e. antibody to donor HLA or ABO antigens, which were once thought to be absolute contraindications to transplantation. Desensitization protocols are also being applied to permit transplantation of HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cells to patients with antibody to donor HLA, to enhance the opportunity for transplantation of non-renal organs, and to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Although desensitization for organ transplantation carries an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, ultimately these transplants extend and enhance the quality of life for solid organ recipients, and desensitization that permits transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is life saving for patients with limited donor options. Complex patient factors and variability in treatment protocols have made it difficult to identify, precisely, the mechanisms underlying the downregulation of donor-specific antibodies. The mechanisms underlying desensitization may differ among the various protocols in use, although there are likely to be some common features. However, it is likely that desensitization achieves a sort of immune detente by first reducing the immunologic barrier and then by creating an environment in which an autoregulatory process restricts the immune response to the allograft.