Results of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using a simplified protocol at a single institution

Preoperative Factors Affecting Graft Survival After ABO-incompatible Adult Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) has undergone remarkable progress, the prognostic factors are poorly understood. This study aimed to elucidate the preoperative factors affecting graft survival after ABOi LT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ABOi LT between January 2012 and December 2020 at a single institution in South Korea were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 146 recipients, including 34 patients with graft loss, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, recipient age (≥55 y; hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-5.19; P  = 0.017) and donor ABO type (donor A, hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-7.33; P  = 0.009) were significantly associated with an increased risk of graft loss. The most common cause of graft loss was recipient death due to bacterial infection (15/34, 44.1%). Both recipient age and donor ABO type were associated with an increased risk of recipient death due to bacterial infections. The incidence of complications after ABOi LT, including antibody-mediated rejection and diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture, did not differ according to recipient age or donor ABO type.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that recipient age and donor ABO type should be considered when preparing for ABOi LT. Careful monitoring and care after transplantation are required for recipients with preoperative risk factors.

High Number of Plasma Exchanges Increases the Risk of Bacterial Infection in ABO-incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are major complications that cause significant mortality and morbidity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The risk of bacterial infection has not been studied in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) recipients with a desensitization protocol in relation to the number of plasma exchanges (PEs). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk of bacterial infection in ABOi LDLT recipients with a high number of PEs compared with recipients with a low number of PEs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with 681 adult LDLT recipients, of whom 171 ABOi LDLT recipients were categorized into the high (n = 52) or low (n = 119) PE groups based on a cutoff value of 6 PE sessions. We compared bacterial infections and postoperative bacteremia within 6 mo after liver transplantation with the ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT group (n = 510) as a control group.

RESULTS

The high PE group showed a bacterial infection rate of 49.9% and a postoperative bacteremia rate of 28.8%, which were significantly higher than those of the low PE group (31.1%, 17.8%) and the ABOc group (26.7%, 18.0%). In multivariate analysis, the high PE group was found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of bacterial infection ( P  = 0.008). This group presented a lower 5-y survival rate of 58.6% compared with the other 2 groups (81.5% and 78.5%; P  = 0.030 and 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of preoperative PEs increases bacterial infection rate and postoperative bacteremia in ABOi LDLT.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

The critical role of therapeutic plasma exchange in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The shortage of donor liver restricts liver transplantation (LT). Nowadays, donor liver with ABO blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient has become an option to expand the source of donor liver. Although it is now possible to perform ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) LT, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been recognized as the primary cause of desperate outcomes after ABO-I LT. Anti-A/B antibody is the trigger of immune response to ABO-I LT graft injury. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can quickly reduce the titer of plasma antibodies and effectively inhibit humoral immunity.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed and CNKI databases using search terms "therapeutic plasma exchange", "ABO-incompatible liver transplantation", "ABO-I LT", "liver transplantation", "LT", "antibody-mediated rejection", and "AMR". Additional publications were identified by a manual search of references from key articles. The relevant publications published before September 30, 2020 were included in this review.

RESULTS

Different centers have made different attempts on whether to use TPE, when to use TPE and how often to use TPE. However, the control standard of lectin revision level is always controversial, the target titer varies significantly from center to center, and the standard target titer has not yet been established. TPE has several schemes to reduce antibody titers, but there is a lack of clinical trials that provide standardized procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is essential for ABO-I LT. Hence, further research and clinical trials should be conducted to determine the best regimen for TPE to remove ABO antibodies and prevent AMR.

ABO-incompatible Pediatric Liver Transplantation With Antibody and B-cell Depletion-free Immunosuppressive Protocol in High Consanguinity Communities

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation as a life-saving treatment has led to new indications and a greater competition for organ grafts. Pediatric patients with acute liver-related crises can benefit from orthotopic liver transplantation, but organ availability in the limited time can be a major obstacle. Crossing ABO blood group barriers could increase the organs available to such patients.

METHODS

From November 2010 to June 2015, 176 children aged 0.2-to18 y were transplanted in the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Out of those, 19 children were transplanted across blood group barriers (ABO incompatible). The underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 6); progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (n = 4); Crigler-Najjar syndrome (n = 3); hepatoblastoma (n = 2); and urea cycle disorder, Caroli disease, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and neonatal sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1 each). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and steroids. Pretransplant prophylactic plasmapheresis, high-dose immunoglobulins, and rituximab were not administered.

RESULTS

The grafts were from living donors (n = 17) and deceased donors (n = 2). Living donor morbidity was nil. The recipient median age was 21 mo (5-70 mo). After a median follow-up of 44 mo, 2 recipients (10%) died because of sepsis, 1 because of uncontrolled acute myeloid leukemia. The overall rejection rate was 7%, and no grafts were lost because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). HLA matching was 3.8 of 6 (A, B, DR), and there were 2 patients presented with acute cellular rejection, 1 patient with AMR, and 1 patient with biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible and life-saving option even with antibody and B-cell depletion-free protocol without increasing the risks for AMR. We speculate that this excellent result is most likely because of presence of relatively low titer ABO isoagglutinins and the high HLA match compatibility caused by habit of longstanding interfamilial marriages as typical of Saudi Arabia.

No diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture after ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation using tailored rituximab-based desensitization protocol

Background

Rituximab (RTx) desensitization protocol offered good outcome in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture (DIHBS) is still inevitable hurdle. We selectively added postoperative high dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and/or simultaneous splenectomy if ABO isoagglutinin titer just before liver transplantation after plasma exchange (PE) was higher than 1/16. Herein, we reported the excellent outcome of ABOi LDLT without DIHBS using tailored desensitization protocol and compared it with that of ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT.

Methods

Sixty-five cases (14.8%) of ABOi LDLTs were performed among 438 primary adult LDLTs in our center between March 2012 and June 2017. We performed 1-to-2 propensity score matching (PSM) to extract 60 cases of ABOi LDLTs and 120 cases of ABOc LDLTs.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between ABOi and ABOc recipients. There were no significant differences in complications and rejection. There was no DIHBS in both groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.3%, 86.7%, and 82.9% in ABOi group and 96.7%, 86.7%, and 85.4% in ABOc group, respectively (P=0.88). Most common cause of deaths of both groups was hepatocellular recurrence. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year biliary complication (anastomosis leakage or stricture) free survival rates were 81.4%, 69.5%, and 67.5% in ABOi group and 83.0%, 81.3%, and 80.0% in ABOc group, with no significant differences (P=0.11).

Conclusions

RTx-based tailored (optional IVIG + splenectomy) desensitization protocol for ABOi LDLT was feasible and acceptable.

The feasibility of organ transplantation during the COVID-19 outbreak: experiences from South Korea

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors.

Liver Transplantation in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) develop chronic liver disease via etiologies including sickle cell hepatopathy, acquired viral hepatitis, or secondary hemochromatosis. It is unclear how many patients with SCD ultimately undergo liver transplantation (LT) and what factors are associated with survival after LT. In this study, we examined LT outcomes in these patients by reviewing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and our institutional experience.

METHODS

Analysis of the SRTR identified 23 LT recipients and five simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) recipients with SCD. Patient demographics and graft and patient survival were analyzed. Two patients with SCD at our institution underwent SLKT.

RESULTS

Review of the SRTR revealed that recipients with SCD had significantly higher model for end-stage liver disease scores (33 versus 21, P = 0.004), preoperative intensive care unit admission (43.5% versus 19.1%, P = 0.007), preoperative dialysis (17.4% versus 4.9%, P = 0.009), and were more likely to be status 1 (26.1% versus 12.1%, P = 0.041) when compared with the reference population of African American LT recipients. Despite being higher risk at the time of LT, patients with SCD had equivalent posttransplant graft and patient survival when compared with the reference population (P = 0.5 and P = 0.2, respectively) and a 2:1 propensity score-matched group (P = 0.5 and P = 0.2, respectively). Two recent SLKT recipients with SCD from our institution have performed well with stable allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the SRTR demonstrate that patients with SCD can expect equivalent graft and patient survival after LT despite exhibiting more comorbidities at the time of LT. The low number of patients with SCD who underwent LT in the SRTR in comparison with the rate of chronic liver disease in this population raises the question as to whether a disparity in access to LT exists for this complex population.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Immunologic strategies and outcomes in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) after adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABO-I LDLT) induced hepatic necrosis or diffuse intrahepatic biliary complications, which were related with poor graft and patient survival. Various desensitization protocols have been used to overcome these problems. Since using rituximab, the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT show a similar survival rate to those of ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation. However, diffuse bile duct complications still occur after ABO-I LDLT. We have reviewed the past and current immune strategies for desensitization and to provide outcomes and ABO incompatibility-related complications in ABO-I LDLT.

Simultaneous ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation and splenectomy without plasma exchange in China: Two case reports

ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is performed if an ABO-compatible graft cannot be obtained. However, a perfect desensitization protocol has not been established worldwide, especially for simultaneous ABO-i LDLT and splenectomy. We herein report two cases of ABO-i LDLT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of ABO-i LDLT in an adult patient in China. Splenectomy and T-cell-targeted immunosuppression (basiliximab) was used to overcome the blood group barrier in these recipients. The patients had good graft function without signs of antibody-mediated rejection throughout the 12-month follow-up. Thus, ABO-i LDLT with splenectomy is undoubtedly life-saving when an ABO-compatible graft cannot be obtained for patients in critical condition.

EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines on the management of acute (fulminant) liver failure

The term acute liver failure (ALF) is frequently applied as a generic expression to describe patients presenting with or developing an acute episode of liver dysfunction. In the context of hepatological practice, however, ALF refers to a highly specific and rare syndrome, characterised by an acute abnormality of liver blood tests in an individual without underlying chronic liver disease. The disease process is associated with development of a coagulopathy of liver aetiology, and clinically apparent altered level of consciousness due to hepatic encephalopathy. Several important measures are immediately necessary when the patient presents for medical attention. These, as well as additional clinical procedures will be the subject of these clinical practice guidelines.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Single-Center Experience of ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Liver Transplantation With a New Simplified Intravenous Immunoglobulin Protocol: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

The outcomes of patients who undergo ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have markedly improved as strategies have become more innovative and advanced. Here, we describe 25 cases of ABO-I LDLT with a simplified protocol and compare the outcomes to those of ABO-compatible LDLT. We analyzed outcomes via a retrospective review of 182 adult LDLT cases including 25 ABO-I LDLTs from January 2011 to December 2014. Propensity scoring was used to compare the groups. The desensitization protocol included plasma exchange, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin without local infusion therapy. The triple immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil; a splenectomy was not routinely performed. The median age of recipients was 51 years (range, 35-66 years), and the median mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-37). The initial ranges of isoagglutinin IgM and IgG titers were 1:1 to 1:256 and 1:4 to 1:2048, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or perioperative variables between the groups. Although significant rebound elevation in anti-ABO antibody during the postoperative period was observed in 3 cases, neither C4d staining nor clinical signs of antibody-mediated rejection was apparent in these cases. No diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture was encountered in any ABO-I LDLT patient within a mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 17.2 months. Moreover, no significant difference in overall or graft survival was observed between the groups. ABO-I LDLT can be performed safely under this new simplified protocol and may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are unavailable.

Current techniques for AB0-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

For a long time, it was considered medical malpractice to neglect the blood group system during transplantation. Because there are far more patients waiting for organs than organs available, a variety of attempts have been made to transplant AB0-incompatible (AB0i) grafts. Improvements in AB0i graft survival rates have been achieved with immunosuppression regimens and plasma treatment procedures. Nevertheless, some grafts are rejected early after AB0i living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to antibody mediated rejection or later biliary complications that affect the quality of life. Therefore, the AB0i LDLT is an option only for emergency situations, and it requires careful planning. This review compares the treatment possibilities and their effect on the patients’ graft outcome from 2010 to the present. We compared 11 transplant center regimens and their outcomes. The best improvement, next to plasma treatment procedures, has been reached with the prophylactic use of rituximab more than one week before AB0i LDLT. Unfortunately, no standardized treatment protocols are available. Each center treats its patients with its own scheme. Nevertheless, the transplant results are homogeneous. Due to refined treatment strategies, AB0i LDLT is a feasible option today and almost free of severe complications.