Mycophenolate Mofetil Withdrawal With Conversion to Everolimus to Treat BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.

Conversion to mTOR-Inhibitors Plus IV Immunoglobulins in Kidney-Transplant Recipients with BKV Infection: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BK virus-associated nephropathy (PvAN) increases the risk of graft failure justifying treatment. Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) and Human polyclonal immunoglobulins (IVIg) could prevent the risk of PvAN. Our retrospective study assessed the efficacy of mTORi associated with IVIg therapy (mTORi±IVIg group) versus standard immunosuppression reduction to clear BKV DNAemia. Among forty-three kidney-transplanted patients with positive BKV DNAemia, we included twenty-six patients in the mTORi±IVIg group and reduced immunosuppression therapy for seventeen patients. We focused on BKV DNAemia clearance on the first-year. Renal function, rejection rate, evolution to PvAN, and complications of immunosuppression were assessed. BKV DNAemia decreased faster and significantly in the control group as compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (p < 0.001). Viral clearance was significantly higher in the control group compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (88% vs. 58%; p = 0.033). Death-censored graft loss, rejection rates and kidney-graft function at 12 months did not significantly differ. Multivariate analyses significantly associated BKV DNAemia clearance with reducing immunosuppression (OR = 0.11 (0.06−0.9), p = 0.045), female kidney donor (OR = 0.10 (0.01−0.59/)], p = 0.018) and time to first DNAemia, (OR = 0.88 (0.76−0.96), p = 0.019). In our study, the standard treatment for BKV DNAemia had better outcomes than an mTORi±IVIg conversion.

Stepwise Reduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil with Conversion to Everolimus for the Treatment of Active BKV in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience in Vietnam

Background: No specific antiviral drug can effectively treat BKV reactivation after kidney transplantation. Thus, we evaluated stepwise-reduced immunosuppression to treat BKV reactivation. Methods: 341 kidney-transplant recipients were monitored for BKV infection (BKV-viremia, BKV-viruria). Positive samples with a significant virus load were nested PCR-genotyped in the VP1 region. In 97/211 patients presenting BKV viremia ≥104 copies/mL and/or BKV viruria ≥107 copies/mL, or BKV-nephropathy immunosuppression (i.e., mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) was reduced by 50%. If viral load did not decrease within 28 days, MMF dose was further reduced by 25%, although calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) therapy remained unchanged. If BKV viral load did not decrease within another 28 days, MMF was withdrawn and replaced by everolimus combined with reduced CNIs. Results: Only 41/97 BKV (+) cases completed the 6-month follow-up. Among these, 29 (71%) were in the BKV-I group and 12 (29%) were in BKV-IV. BKV viruria and BKV viremia were significantly decreased from 9.32 to 6.09 log10 copies/mL, and from 3.59 to 2.45 log10 copies/mL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). 11/32 (34.4%) patients were cleared of BKV viremia; 2/32 (6.3%) patients were cleared of BKV in both serum and urine, and 9/9 (100%) only had BKV viruria but did not develop BKV viremia. eGFR remained stable. No patient with BKV-related nephropathy had graft loss. There was a significant inverse relationship between changes in eGFR and serum BKV load (r = −0.314, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This stepwise immunosuppressive strategy proved effective at reducing BKV viral load in kidney transplant recipients that had high BKV loads in serum and/or urine. Renal function remained stable without rejection.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

Viral-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant patients maintained on everolimus and low dose tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Maintenance with "everolimus + reduced dose tacrolimus" (Ev + Tac_low ) was reported to reduce the risk of viral infections compared to (Tac + MMF). Here we examined viremia and viral-specific T-cell (viral-Tc) responses in patients treated with Ev + Tac_low v. Tac + MMF in highly-HLA sensitized patients.

METHODS

HLA sensitized (HS) kidney transplant patients were monitored pre- and post-transplant for viremia (CMV, BK and EBV) by PCR in 19 Ev + Tac_low and 48 Tac + MMF patients. For CMV PCR analysis, we compared infection rates in 19 Ev + Tac_low patients to 48 CMV D+/R- (#28) or CMV D-/R- (#20) Tac + MMF patients. CMV-Tc and EBV-Tc were evaluated by cytokine flow cytometry, and DSA levels by Luminex for selected patients in both groups.

RESULTS

CMV, EBV viremia rates were similar in Ev + Tac_low v. Tac + MMF patients, but BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Tac_low patients. No patient in either group developed BKAN or PTLD. CMV- & EBV-Tc decreased significantly after alemtuzumab induction but returned to pre-treatment levels 1-2 months post-transplant in most patients. de novo DSA was similar in both groups as were patient and graft survival and graft rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV-Tc, EBV-Tc were similar in Ev + Tac_low and Tac + MMF patients. EBV and CMV viremia rates were similar over 1 year. BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Tac_low patients suggesting no benefit for Ev + Tac_low in enhancing viral specific Tc effector functions or limiting viral infections. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Management of Multidrug Resistant Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients with Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited multisystem disease characterised by bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory infections which eventually cause end stage lung disease. Lung transplantation (LTx) is a well-established treatment option for patients with CF-associated lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Navigating recurrent infections in the setting of LTx is often difficult, where immune suppression must be balanced against the constant threat of infection. Sepsis/infections are one of the major contributors to post-LTx mortality and multiresistant organisms (eg, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Mycobacterium abscessus complex, Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora spp.) pose a significant threat to survival. This review will summarize current and novel therapies to assist with the management of multiresistant bacterial, mycobacterial, viral and fungal infections which threaten the CF LTx cohort.

BK virus-associated nephropathy in a lung transplant patient: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is a relatively common cause of renal dysfunction in the first six months after renal transplantation. It arises from reactivation of the latent and usually harmless BK virus (BK virus) due to immunosuppression and other factors including some that are unique to renal transplantation such as allograft injury. BKVAN is much rarer in non-renal solid organ transplantation, where data regarding diagnosis and management are extremely limited.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 58-year-old man found to have worsening renal dysfunction nine months after bilateral sequential lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). He had required methylprednisolone for acute allograft rejection but achieved good graft function. Urine microscopy and culture and renal ultrasound were normal. BK virus PCR was positive at high levels in urine and blood. Renal biopsy subsequently confirmed BKVAN. The patient progressed to end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis despite reduction in immunosuppression, including switching mycophenolate for everolimus, and the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

CONCLUSIONS

This very rare case highlights the challenges presented by BK virus in the non-renal solid organ transplant population. Diagnosis can be difficult, especially given the heterogeneity with which BKV disease has been reported to present in such patients, and the optimal approach to management is unknown. Balancing reduction in immunosuppression against prevention of allograft rejection is delicate. Improved therapeutic options are clearly required.

Association of Pretransplant BK Polyomavirus Antibody Status with BK Polyomavirus Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study of 47 Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention and early detection of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is important for long-term kidney graft survival; hence, pretransplant screening methods are essential to identify recipients at high risk for BKV infection. This study investigated the association of pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status with the occurrence of post-transplant BKV infection.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 47 adult living donor kidney transplant pairs from December 2014 to January 2016. Recipient and donor pretransplant BKV antibody titer was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Donor and recipient median HI titer of 1:20 was used as a cutoff to define seropositivity. Recipients were divided into 2 groups (BKV antibody donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) and non-D+/R-). Urinary cytology was used to screen for BKV infection. Plasma polymerase chain reaction testing for BKV DNA was used when decoy cells in urine were persistently detected.

RESULTS

Nine (19.2%) of 47 patients belonged to the D+/R- group. Decoy cells were observed in 32 recipients (68.1%) during follow-up. BK viremia occurred in 3 (6.4%) cases. The maximum decoy cell count was significantly higher in the D+/R- group than in the non-D+/R- group (P = .0002). Decoy-cell-free survival was significantly shorter in the D+/R- group (P = .0220). Multivariate analysis identified only BKV antibody serostatus as an independent risk factor for decoy cell appearance (P = .0491).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status was associated with higher maximum decoy cell count and shorter decoy-cell-free survival after kidney transplantation.

Everolimus for BKV nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: a prospective, controlled study

There is no specific therapy for polyoma BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in kidney transplant recipients, a condition associated with poor outcomes. Everolimus showed promising antiviral effects, but data from prospective studies are limited. Therefore, we converted ten consecutive kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven BKVN from standard exposure Calcineurin inhibitors and Mycophenolate to Everolimus and reduced exposure Calcineurin inhibitors. Ten patients not administered Everolimus, on reduced exposure Calcineurin inhibitor and halved MPA doses served as controls. All kidney transplant recipients continued steroid therapy. Each patient underwent kidney graft biopsy, BKV replication by PCR, and de novo DSA determination. During a 3-year follow-up no graft loss occurred in kidney transplant recipients on Everolimus but it was observed in 5/10 controls (P = 0.032). eGFR improved on Everolimus and worsened in controls (between group difference + 25.6 ml/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 10.5-40.7, P = 0.002). BKV replication declined in the Everolimus group alone (from 6.4 ± 0.8 to 3.6 ± 1.6 Log 10 genomic copies, P = 0.0001), and we found a significant inverse relationship between eGFR and BKV genomic copy changes (P = 0.022). Average Calcineurin inhibitors trough levels did not differ between the two study groups during follow-up. By multivariable Cox regression analysis, Everolimus treatment resulted the only significant predictor of survival free of a combined endpoint of graft loss and 57% eGFR reduction (P = 0.02). Kidney transplant recipients on Everolimus had a higher survival free of adverse graft outcome (log-rank test, P = 0.009). In conclusion an Everolimus-based immunosuppressive protocol with minimization of Calcineurin inhibitors and antimetabolite discontinuation effectively treated BKVN in kidney transplant recipients.

Successful treatment of BK virus associated-nephropathy in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive kidney transplant recipient

BK virus (BKV) is an opportunistic pathogen in those with impaired immunity. Viral replication is generally asymptomatic but is able to induce cytopathic alterations in renal cells. If BKV infection is left untreated, it leads to BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and graft loss. There is scarce experience in the management of BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients living with HIV. We report the successful treatment of BKVAN in an HIV-positive kidney transplant recipient who experienced BKV replication in the immediate post-transplantation period. A change in therapy from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus, steroid withdrawal and a short course of an immunomodulatory agent (leflunomide) controlled BKV viremia in the absence of drug side-effects or impairment of graft function.

Viremia Negativization After BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplantation: A National Bicentric Study

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) infection represents a potentially dreadful complication after kidney transplantation (KT). When BK viremia is detected, the best therapeutic approach remains not entirely clarified. Critical elements of BK viremia treatment are immunosuppression minimization and introduction of drugs like leflunomide, everolimus, and fluoroquinolones. The study aimed to analyze the results of the BK viremia management in 2 collaborative Italian centers.

METHODS

Ten patients undergoing KT in the 2 collaborative Italian centers of Sapienza University of Rome and University of L'Aquila from January 2013 to December 2017 and showing a post-KT diagnosis of BK viremia were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Mean time from KT to BKV positivity was 7 months (range: 1-19 months). At diagnosis, the mean viral load was 683,842 copies/mL (range: 5800-4,052,415 copies/mL), with an average zenith of 2,428,410 copies/mL (range: 6762-18,022,500 copies/mL). In the 5 patients with BKV nephropathy, we observed a switch from antimetabolite to leflunomide (n = 5), a switch from tacrolimus to everolimus (n = 3), or an introduction of fluoroquinolones (n = 3). BKV clearance was achieved in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early BKV diagnosis and stepwise minimization of immunosuppression remain the first-line approach in patients with BK viremia. In the presence of BKV nephropathy, a combination of antiviral drugs like leflunomide and fluoroquinolones/everolimus should favor viremia clearance.

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) remains a relevant complication following kidney transplantation with allograft loss rates of up to 50%. Reduction in overall immunosuppression is a cornerstone of therapy, whereas no specific antiviral regimen has shown conclusive benefit to date. The present case series demonstrates the efficacy of a dual therapeutic approach with low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in PVAN.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven PVAN having received low-dose cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg) according to the Tübingen Cidofovir Protocol and been converted to mTOR-based immunosuppression were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with a median follow-up of 2.24 [IQR 1.55-5.01] years were included in the analysis. Median time to PVAN diagnosis was 268 [IQR 153-869] days after transplantation. Polyomavirus clearance from plasma was achieved in 78% of patients after a median of 118 [IQR 76-293] days. Of the 23 patients, nine patients (39%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, but only three of these (13%) due to PVAN. Fourteen patients (61%) stabilized or improved allograft function. The cidofovir protocol allowed for specific antiviral therapy without adverse nephrotoxicity, even in patients with low allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression allow for effective virus clearance and preservation of allograft function in a high proportion of patients with PVAN and progressive allograft dysfunction and may prolong allograft survival in these patients.

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I; sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an improvement in survival rates and satisfactory short term graft survival. However, there has been little improvement in long-term survival. The place of target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I) (sirolimus, everolimus), which have different modes of action from other commonly used immunosuppressive agents, in kidney transplantation remains uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short and long-term benefits and harms of TOR-I (sirolimus and everolimus) when used in primary immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 20 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which drug regimens, containing TOR-I commenced within seven days of transplant, were compared to alternative drug regimens, were included without age restriction, dosage or language of report.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE MAIN RESULTS: Seventy studies (17,462 randomised participants) were included; eight studies included two comparisons to provide 78 comparisons. Outcomes were reported at six months to three years post transplant. Risk of bias was judged to be low for sequence generation in 25 studies, for allocation concealment in 23 studies, performance bias in four studies, detection bias in 65 studies, attrition bias in 45 studies, selective reporting bias in 48 studies, and for other potential bias in three studies. Risk of bias was judged to be at high risk of bias for sequence generation in two studies, allocation concealment in two studies, performance bias in 61 studies, detection bias in one study, attrition bias in four studies, for selective reporting bias in 11 studies and for other potential risk of bias in 46 studies. Compared with CNI and antimetabolite, TOR-I with antimetabolite probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.98; 19 studies) or malignancies (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.48; 10 studies); probably increases graft loss censored for death (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.81; 15 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.04; 15 studies), need to change treatment (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.88 to 3.11; 14 studies) and wound complications (RR 2.56, 95% CI 1.94 to 3.36; 12 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); but reduces CMV infection (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63; 13 studies) (high certainty evidence). Compared with antimetabolites and CNI, TOR-I with CNI probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.33; 31 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.45; 26 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; 24 studies); and malignancies (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07; 17 studies); probably increases the need to change treatment (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.90; 25 studies), and wound complications (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.91; 17 studies); but probably reduces CMV infection (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58; 25 studies) (moderate certainty evidence). Lower dose TOR-I and standard dose CNI compared with higher dose TOR-I and reduced dose CNI probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.78; 9 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.20; 8 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.13; 8 studies), and CMV infection (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.60; 5 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); and may make little or no difference to wound complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.71; 3 studies), malignancies (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.04; 7 studies), and the need to change treatments (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.42; 5 studies) (low certainty evidence). Lower dose of TOR-I compared with higher doses probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06; 13 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.19; 12 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.43; 11 studies), CMV infection (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.21; 9 studies), wound complications (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.29; 7 studies), and malignancy (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.32; 10 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); and may make little or no difference to the need to change treatments (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.05; 10 studies) (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether sirolimus and everolimus differ in their effects on kidney function and lipid levels because the certainty of the evidence is very low based on a single small study with only three months of follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In studies with follow-up to three years, TOR-I with an antimetabolite increases the risk of graft loss and acute rejection compared with CNI and an antimetabolite. TOR-I with CNI potentially offers an alternative to an antimetabolite with CNI as rates of graft loss and acute rejection are similar between interventions and TOR-I regimens are associated with a reduced risk of CMV infections. Wound complications and the need to change immunosuppressive medications are higher with TOR-I regimens. While further new studies are not required, longer-term follow-up data from participants in existing methodologically robust RCTs are needed to determine how useful immunosuppressive regimens, which include TOR-I, are in maintaining kidney transplant function and survival beyond three years.

Viral infections directly involved in kidney allograft function

Modern immunosuppressive therapy has dramatically reduced the incidence of acute rejection and improved graft survival in kidney transplant patients. However, infectious complications remain an important issue. Amongst the various pathogens, viruses such as adenovirus and polyomavirus BK can directly cause acute or chronic graft dysfunction. Adenovirus mainly causes haemorrhagic cystitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis in kidney transplant patients. While patients show apparent clinical symptoms such as fever, dysuria, gross haematuria, frequency and urgency of urination, and most patients show acute graft dysfunction, these symptoms and graft dysfunction are reversible. Polyomavirus BK infection, however, is asymptomatic but graft outcome is poor if the patient develops tissue-invasive nephropathy confirmed by graft biopsy. Recently, an attempt to create a pathological classification for predicting the clinical course has been made by the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy. With regards to treatment, the basic strategy is a reduction of calcineurin inhibitor and/or antimetabolites, and the effectiveness of several adjunct treatments has been investigated in several clinical trials. There are other unresolved issues, such as the diagnosis of subsequent acute rejection, the definition of remission, methods of resuming immunosuppression and long-term follow-up. Most of all, development of effective vaccines and novel drug discovery are necessary to prevent the development and progression of BKV-associated nephropathy.

Tailoring tacrolimus therapy in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease is increasing worldwide. The best treatment is kidney transplantation, although life-long immunosuppressive therapy is then mandatory. Currently, the cornerstone immunosuppressive therapy relies on tacrolimus (Tac), a calcineurin inhibitor that is nephrotoxic but whose exposition can be minimized in a delicate balance. Area covered: We addressed whether, in the setting of kidney transplantation, Tac-based therapy can be tailored to medical needs: to achieve this, we searched for suitable articles in PubMed. Expert commentary: Too over-minimization of Tac, when associated with mycophenolic acid (MPA), may cause the development of de novo donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). However, Tac minimization, in the context of everolimus-associated therapy instead of MPA, does not increase DSA formation as demonstrated in the TRANSFORM study and, in addition, can prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation. Nonetheless, Tac therapy, regardless of its formulation (immediate or extended release) compared to cyclosporine A, increases the risk of posttransplant diabetes mellitus; this increase is not affected by steroid therapy. Tac-based immunosuppression remains the best immunosuppressive therapy in kidney-transplant recipients and can be tailored according to patients' need.