1
|
Oliveras L, Coloma A, Lloberas N, Lino L, Favà A, Manonelles A, Codina S, Couceiro C, Melilli E, Sharif A, Hecking M, Guthoff M, Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Montero N. Immunosuppressive drug combinations after kidney transplantation and post-transplant diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100856. [PMID: 38723582 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT). This systematic review investigated the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the risk of PTDM. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included KT recipients with any immunosuppression and reported PTDM outcomes up to 1 October 2023. The analysis included 125 RCTs. We found no differences in PTDM risk within induction therapies. In de novo KT, there was an increased risk of developing PTDM with tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (RR 1.71, 95%CI [1.38-2.11]). No differences were observed between tacrolimus+mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and tacrolimus+MMF/MPA, but there was a tendency towards a higher risk of PTDM in the cyclosporin+mTORi group (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.99-2.04]). Conversion from cyclosporin to an mTORi increased PTDM risk (RR 1.89, 95%CI [1.18-3.03]). De novo belatacept compared with a calcineurin inhibitor resulted in 50% lower risk of PTDM (RR 0.50, 95%CI [0.32-0.79]). Steroid avoidance resulted in 31% lower PTDM risk (RR 0.69, 95%CI [0.57-0.83]), whereas steroid withdrawal resulted in no differences. Immunosuppression should be decided on an individual basis, carefully weighing the risk of future PTDM and rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laia Oliveras
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Coloma
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Nuria Lloberas
- Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Lino
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Alexandre Favà
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Anna Manonelles
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Codina
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Couceiro
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Melilli
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adnan Sharif
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Manfred Hecking
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Josep M Cruzado
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Nephrology Department, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Nuria Montero
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fitzsimmons WE, Naesens M. Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplant-An Endpoint Not Predictive of Treatment Effect on Graft Survival. Transplantation 2024; 108:593-597. [PMID: 37322579 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William E Fitzsimmons
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hou FF, Xie D, Wang J, Xu X, Yang X, Ai J, Nie S, Liang M, Wang G, Jia N. Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil Among Patients With Progressive IgA Nephropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2254054. [PMID: 36745456 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in management of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains highly controversial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF in patients with IgAN at high risk of kidney function loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial with open-label, blinded end-point design was conducted among adults with IgAN, proteinuria greater than 1.0 g/d, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than 30 and less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 or with persistent hypertension from September 2013 to December 2015. During a 3-month run-in period, 238 patients received optimized supportive care (SC), including losartan. Patients with a urinary protein excretion rate of 0.75 g/d or greater despite of 3 months optimized SC were enrolled into the trial for 3 years. Survivors of the trial who did not receive dialysis or transplant were followed up after the trial for a median (IQR) of 60 (47-76) months. Data were analyzed from March through June 2022. INTERVENTIONS A total of 170 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MMF (initially, 1.5 g/d for 12 months, maintained at 0.75-1.0 g for at least 6 months) plus SC or SC alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were (1) a composite of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplant, or kidney failure without receiving kidney replacement therapy), or death due to kidney or cardiovascular cause and (2) progression of chronic kidney disease. RESULTS Among 170 randomized patients (mean [SD] age 36.6 [9.4] years; 94 [55.3%] male patients), 85 patients received MMF with SC and 85 patients received SC alone. The mean (SD) eGFR was 50.1 (17.9) mL/min/1.73m2 and mean (SD) proteinuria level was 1.9 (1.7) g/d; 168 patients (98.8%) completed the trial, and 157 participants (92.4%) survived and did not receive dialysis or transplant. Primary composite outcome events occurred in 6 patients (7.1%) in the MMF group and 18 patients (21.2%) in the SC group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63). Progression of chronic kidney disease occurred in 7 participants (8.2%) in the MMF group and 23 participants (27.1%) in the SC group (aHR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.57). The effect of MMF treatment on primary outcomes was consistent across prespecified subgroups, with no significant interaction per subgroup. During posttrial follow-up, annual loss of eGFR accelerated after discontinuation of MMF; mean (SD) annual eGFR loss during the study period was 2.9 (1.0) mL/min/1.73m2 in the MMF group and 6.1 (1.2) mL/min/1.73m2 among 66 patients in the MMF group who discontinued MMF after the trial. Serious adverse events were not more frequent with MMF vs SC alone. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that addition of MMF to SC compared with SC alone significantly reduced risk of disease progression among patients with progressive IgAN. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01854814.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Fan Hou
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Di Xie
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaobing Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Ai
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sheng Nie
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Min Liang
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guobao Wang
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Nan Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renal Failure Research, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cyclophosphamide Attenuates Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis by Regulating Mesangial Cell Cycle Progression. DISEASE MARKERS 2021; 2021:3803601. [PMID: 34820026 PMCID: PMC8608492 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3803601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Most patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop lupus nephritis (LN) with severe kidney manifestations. Renal fibrosis can be primarily attributed to overproliferation of mesangial cells (MCs), which are subject to drug treatment. Nevertheless, the detailed mechanisms remain elusive. We sought to identify the effect of cyclophosphamide (CTX), a drug commonly used for LN treatment, on MC proliferation and explore its underlying mechanisms. Material/Methods. Cell proliferation and fibrosis in mouse kidney tissues were determined by histopathology staining techniques. Flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Cell cycle regulators were examined in vitro following treatment of immortalized human MCs with platelet-derived growth factor subunit B (PDGF-B). Quantitative real-time PCR and western blot analyses were used to measure the mRNA and protein levels of candidate cell cycle regulators, respectively. Results CTX inhibited cell overproliferation induced by platelet-derived growth factor subunit B in vitro and in vivo. CTX (40 mg/l) was sufficient to induce G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest. CTX treatment downregulated many critical cell cycle regulators including cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases but upregulated cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Additionally, CTX-treated samples showed significantly reduced fibrosis, as indicated by lower expression of interleukin-1β and α-smooth muscle actin. Conclusion CTX inhibits proliferation of MCs by modulating cell cycle regulator and therefore arresting them at G1 phase. CTX treatment significantly alleviates the severity of renal fibrosis. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms by which CTX affects LN.
Collapse
|
5
|
Protocol Biopsies on de novo Renal-Transplants at 3 Months after Surgery: Impact on 5-Year Transplant Survival. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163635. [PMID: 34441931 PMCID: PMC8397165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In many centers, a protocol kidney biopsy (PKB) is performed at 3 months post-transplantation (M3), without a demonstrated benefit on death-censored graft survival (DCGS). In this study, we compared DCGS between kidney transplant recipients undergoing a PKB or without such biopsy while accounting for the obvious indication bias. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2007 and 2013, we compared DCGS with respect to the availability and features of a PKB. We built a propensity score (PS) to account for PKB indication likelihood and adjusted the DCGS analysis on PKB availability and the PS. Results: A total of 615 patients were included: 333 had a PKB, 282 did not. In bivariate Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, adjusting for the availability of a PKB and for the PS, a PKB was associated with a better 5-year DCGS independently of the PS (p < 0.001). Among the PKB+ patients, 87 recipients (26%) had IF/TA > 0. Patients with an IF/TA score of 3 had the worst survival. A total of 144 patients (44%) showed cv lesions. Patients with cv2 and cv3 lesions had the worst 5-year DCGS. Conclusions: A M3 PKB was associated with improved graft survival independently of potential confounders. These results could be explained by the early treatment of subclinical immunological events. It could be due to better management of the immunosuppressive regimen.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hellemans R, Pengel L, Choquet S, Maggiore U. Managing immunosuppressive therapy in potentially cured post-kidney transplant cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer): overview of the available evidence and guidance for shared decision making. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1789-1800. [PMID: 34146426 PMCID: PMC8518116 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have increased incidence of de novo cancers. After having undergone treatment for cancer with curative intent, reducing the overall immunosuppressive load and/or switching to an alternative drug regimen may potentially be of great benefit to avoid cancer recurrence, but should be balanced against the risks of rejection and/or severe adverse events. The TLJ (Transplant Learning Journey) project is an initiative from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). This article reports a systematic literature search undertaken by TLJ Workstream 3 to answer the questions: (1) Should we decrease the overall anti‐rejection therapy in potentially cured post‐kidney transplant cancer (excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer)? (2) Should we switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) in potentially cured post‐kidney transplant cancer (excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer)? The literature search revealed insufficient solid data on which to base recommendations, so this review additionally presents an extensive overview of the indirect evidence on the benefits versus risks of alterations in immunosuppressive medication. We hope this summary will help transplant physicians advise KTRs on how best to continue with anti‐rejection therapy after receiving cancer treatment with curative intent, and aid shared decision‐making, ensuring that patient preferences are taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hellemans
- Department of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre of Evidence for Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Sylvain Choquet
- Service d'Hématologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Nephrology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Impact of Subclinical Borderline Inflammation on Kidney Transplant Outcomes. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e663. [PMID: 33511268 PMCID: PMC7837932 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Surveillance biopsies permit early detection of subclinical inflammation before clinical dysfunction, but the impact of detecting early subclinical phenotypes remains unclear. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 441 consecutive kidney transplant recipients between 2015 and 2018 with surveillance biopsies at 6 months post-transplant. We tested the hypothesis that early subclinical inflammation (subclinical borderline changes, T cell-mediated rejection, or microvascular injury) is associated with increased incidence of a composite endpoint including acute rejection and allograft failure. Results. Using contemporaneous Banff criteria, we detected subclinical inflammation in 31%, with the majority (75%) having a subclinical borderline phenotype (at least minimal inflammation with mild tubulitis [>i0t1]). Overall, subclinical inflammation was independently associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.88; 1.11-7.51; P = 0.03). The subgroup with subclinical borderline inflammation, predominantly those meeting the Banff 2019 i1t1 threshold, was independently associated with 5-fold increased hazard for the composite endpoint (P = 0.02). Those with concurrent subclinical inflammation and subclinical chronic allograft injury had worse outcomes. The effect of treating subclinical inflammation was difficult to ascertain in small heterogeneous subgroups. Conclusions. Subclinical acute and chronic inflammation are common at 6 months post-transplant in kidney recipients with stable allograft function. The subclinical borderline phenotype with both tubulitis and interstitial inflammation was independently associated with poor long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of surveillance biopsies for management of allograft inflammation in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Use of De Novo mTOR Inhibitors in Hypersensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Experience From Clinical Practice. Transplantation 2020; 104:1686-1694. [PMID: 32732848 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is commonly believed that mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) should not be used in high-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients due to a perceived increased risk of rejection. However, almost all trials that examined the association of optimal-dose mTORi with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have excluded hypersensitized recipients from enrollment. METHODS To shed light on this issue, we examined 71 consecutive patients with a baseline calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥50% that underwent kidney transplantation from June 2013 to December 2016 in our unit. Immunosuppression was based on CNI (tacrolimus), steroids and alternatively mycophenolic acid (MPA; n = 38), or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 33, target trough levels 3-8 ng/mL). RESULTS Demographic and immunological risk profiles were similar, and almost 90% of patients in both groups received induction with lymphocyte-depleting agents. Cox-regression analysis of rejection-free survival revealed better results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection (hazard ratio [confidence interval], 0.32 [0.11-0.90], P = 0.031 at univariable analysis and 0.34 [0.11-0.95], P = 0.040 at multivariable analysis). There were no differences in 1-year renal function, Banff chronicity score at 3- and 12-month protocol biopsy and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Tacrolimus trough levels along the first year were not different between groups (12-mo levels were 8.72 ± 2.93 and 7.85 ± 3.07 ng/mL for MPA and mTORi group respectively, P = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS This single-center retrospective cohort analysis suggests that in hypersensitized kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy similar clinical outcomes may be obtained using mTOR inhibitors compared to mycophenolate.
Collapse
|
9
|
Early conversion to a CNI-free immunosuppression with SRL after renal transplantation-Long-term follow-up of a multicenter trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234396. [PMID: 32756556 PMCID: PMC7406080 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Early conversion to a CNI-free immunosuppression with SRL was associated with an improved 1- and 3- yr renal function as compared with a CsA-based regimen in the SMART-Trial. Mixed results were reported on the occurrence of donor specific antibodies under mTOR-Is. Here, we present long-term results of the SMART-Trial. Methods and materials N = 71 from 6 centers (n = 38 SRL and n = 33 CsA) of the original SMART-Trial (ITT n = 140) were enrolled in this observational, non-interventional extension study to collect retrospectively and prospectively follow-up data for the interval since baseline. Primary objective was the development of dnDSA. Blood samples were collected on average 8.7 years after transplantation. Results Development of dnDSA was not different (SRL 5/38, 13.2% vs. CsA 9/33, 27.3%; P = 0.097). GFR remained improved under SRL with 64.37 ml/min/1.73m2 vs. 53.19 ml/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.044). Patient survival did not differ between groups at 10 years. There was a trend towards a reduced graft failure rate (11.6% SRL vs. 23.9% CsA, p = 0.064) and less tumors under SRL (2.6% SRL vs. 15.2% CsA, p = 0.09). Conclusions An early conversion to SRL did not result in an increased incidence of dnDSA nor increased long-term risk for the recipient. Transplant function remains improved with benefits for the graft survival.
Collapse
|
10
|
Monitoring of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An Evidence-based Expert Paper. Transplantation 2020; 104:S1-S12. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
The standardization of renal allograft pathology began in 1991 at the first Banff Conference held in Banff, Alberta, Canada. The first task of transplant pathologists, clinicians, and surgeons was to establish diagnostic criteria for T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). The histological threshold for this diagnosis was arbitrarily set at "i2t2": a mononuclear interstitial cell infiltrate present in at least 25% of normal parenchyma and >4 mononuclear cells within the tubular basement membrane of nonatrophic tubules. TCMR was usually found in dysfunctional grafts with an elevation in the serum creatinine; however, our group and others found this extent of inflammation in "routine" or "protocol" biopsies of normally functioning grafts: "subclinical" TCMR. The prevalence of TCMR is higher in the early months posttransplant and has decreased with the increased potency of current immunosuppressive agents. However, the pathogenicity of lesser degrees of inflammation under modern immunosuppression and the relation between ongoing inflammation and development of donor-specific antibody has renewed our interest in subclinical alloreactivity. Finally, the advances in our understanding of pretransplant risk assessment, and our increasing ability to monitor patients less invasively posttransplant, promises to usher in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
|
12
|
The First Asian Kidney Transplantation Prediction Models for Long-term Patient and Allograft Survival. Transplantation 2020; 104:1048-1057. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Hahn D, Hodson EM, Hamiwka LA, Lee VWS, Chapman JR, Craig JC, Webster AC. Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I; sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD004290. [PMID: 31840244 PMCID: PMC6953317 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004290.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an improvement in survival rates and satisfactory short term graft survival. However, there has been little improvement in long-term survival. The place of target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I) (sirolimus, everolimus), which have different modes of action from other commonly used immunosuppressive agents, in kidney transplantation remains uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2006. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the short and long-term benefits and harms of TOR-I (sirolimus and everolimus) when used in primary immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 20 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which drug regimens, containing TOR-I commenced within seven days of transplant, were compared to alternative drug regimens, were included without age restriction, dosage or language of report. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE MAIN RESULTS: Seventy studies (17,462 randomised participants) were included; eight studies included two comparisons to provide 78 comparisons. Outcomes were reported at six months to three years post transplant. Risk of bias was judged to be low for sequence generation in 25 studies, for allocation concealment in 23 studies, performance bias in four studies, detection bias in 65 studies, attrition bias in 45 studies, selective reporting bias in 48 studies, and for other potential bias in three studies. Risk of bias was judged to be at high risk of bias for sequence generation in two studies, allocation concealment in two studies, performance bias in 61 studies, detection bias in one study, attrition bias in four studies, for selective reporting bias in 11 studies and for other potential risk of bias in 46 studies. Compared with CNI and antimetabolite, TOR-I with antimetabolite probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.98; 19 studies) or malignancies (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.48; 10 studies); probably increases graft loss censored for death (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.81; 15 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.04; 15 studies), need to change treatment (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.88 to 3.11; 14 studies) and wound complications (RR 2.56, 95% CI 1.94 to 3.36; 12 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); but reduces CMV infection (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63; 13 studies) (high certainty evidence). Compared with antimetabolites and CNI, TOR-I with CNI probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.33; 31 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.45; 26 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; 24 studies); and malignancies (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07; 17 studies); probably increases the need to change treatment (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.90; 25 studies), and wound complications (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.91; 17 studies); but probably reduces CMV infection (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58; 25 studies) (moderate certainty evidence). Lower dose TOR-I and standard dose CNI compared with higher dose TOR-I and reduced dose CNI probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.78; 9 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.20; 8 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.13; 8 studies), and CMV infection (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.60; 5 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); and may make little or no difference to wound complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.71; 3 studies), malignancies (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.04; 7 studies), and the need to change treatments (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.42; 5 studies) (low certainty evidence). Lower dose of TOR-I compared with higher doses probably makes little or no difference to death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06; 13 studies), graft loss censored for death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.19; 12 studies), biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.43; 11 studies), CMV infection (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.21; 9 studies), wound complications (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.29; 7 studies), and malignancy (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.32; 10 studies) (moderate certainty evidence); and may make little or no difference to the need to change treatments (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.05; 10 studies) (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether sirolimus and everolimus differ in their effects on kidney function and lipid levels because the certainty of the evidence is very low based on a single small study with only three months of follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In studies with follow-up to three years, TOR-I with an antimetabolite increases the risk of graft loss and acute rejection compared with CNI and an antimetabolite. TOR-I with CNI potentially offers an alternative to an antimetabolite with CNI as rates of graft loss and acute rejection are similar between interventions and TOR-I regimens are associated with a reduced risk of CMV infections. Wound complications and the need to change immunosuppressive medications are higher with TOR-I regimens. While further new studies are not required, longer-term follow-up data from participants in existing methodologically robust RCTs are needed to determine how useful immunosuppressive regimens, which include TOR-I, are in maintaining kidney transplant function and survival beyond three years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Hahn
- The Children's Hospital at WestmeadDepartment of NephrologyLocked Bag 4001WestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | - Elisabeth M Hodson
- The Children's Hospital at WestmeadCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney ResearchLocked Bag 4001WestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | - Lorraine A Hamiwka
- University of Calgary/Alberta Children's HospitalDepartment of Medicine/Pediatrics2888 Shaganappi Trail NW Children's HospitalCalgaryAlbertaCanadaT3B 6A8
| | - Vincent WS Lee
- Westmead & Blacktown HospitalsDepartment of Renal MedicineDarcy RdWestmeadNSWAustralia2145
- The University of Sydney at WestmeadCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Millennium InstituteWestmeadAustralia
| | - Jeremy R Chapman
- Westmead Millennium Institute, The University of Sydney at WestmeadCentre for Transplant and Renal ResearchDarcy RdWestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- The Children's Hospital at WestmeadCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney ResearchLocked Bag 4001WestmeadNSWAustralia2145
- Flinders UniversityCollege of Medicine and Public HealthAdelaideSAAustralia5001
| | - Angela C Webster
- The University of Sydney at WestmeadCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Millennium InstituteWestmeadAustralia
- The University of SydneySydney School of Public HealthEdward Ford Building A27SydneyNSWAustralia2006
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors Combined With Calcineurin Inhibitors as Initial Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation: A Meta-analysis. Transplantation 2019; 103:2031-2056. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
15
|
Michielsen LA, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Wisse BW, Kamburova EG, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JSF, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJ, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KA, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG, Hilbrands LB. Effect of initial immunosuppression on long-term kidney transplant outcome in immunological low-risk patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; 34:1417-1422. [PMID: 30561730 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated the effect of different immunosuppressive strategies on long-term kidney transplant outcomes. Moreover, as they were usually based on historical data, it was not possible to account for the presence of pretransplant donor-specific human-leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA), a currently recognized risk marker for impaired graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent frequently used initial immunosuppressive therapies increase graft survival in immunological low-risk patients. METHODS We performed an analysis on the PROCARE cohort, a Dutch multicentre study including all transplantations performed in the Netherlands between 1995 and 2005 with available pretransplant serum (n = 4724). All sera were assessed for the presence of DSA by a luminex single-antigen bead assay. Patients with a previous kidney transplantation, pretransplant DSA or receiving induction therapy were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS Three regimes were used in over 200 patients: cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisolone (Pred) (n = 542), CsA/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/Pred (n = 857) and tacrolimus (TAC)/MMF/Pred (n = 811). Covariate-adjusted analysis revealed no significant differences in 10-year death-censored graft survival between patients on TAC/MMF/Pred therapy (79%) compared with patients on CsA/MMF/Pred (82%, P = 0.88) or CsA/Pred (79%, P = 0.21). However, 1-year rejection-free survival censored for death and failure unrelated to rejection was significantly higher for TAC/MMF/Pred (81%) when compared with CsA/MMF/Pred (67%, P < 0.0001) and CsA/Pred (64%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION These results suggest that in immunological low-risk patients excellent long-term kidney graft survival can be achieved irrespective of the type of initial immunosuppressive therapy (CsA or TAC; with or without MMF), despite differences in 1-year rejection-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Michielsen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab. Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab. Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab. Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christien E Voorter
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth M van Duijnhoven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henderikus G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Clinical Significance of Renal Allograft Protocol Biopsies: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in Malaysia. J Transplant 2019; 2019:9153875. [PMID: 31186948 PMCID: PMC6521333 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9153875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of protocol renal allograft biopsy in kidney transplantation is controversial due to the concern with procedural-related complications; however, its role is slowly evolving. Recent evidence suggests that protocol biopsy is useful in detecting subclinical renal pathology. Early recognition and treatment of renal pathologies can improve long-term outcomes of renal allografts. Methodology A total of 362 renal allograft protocol biopsies were performed in adult recipients of kidney transplantation between 2012 and 2017. After excluding those with poor quality or those performed with a baseline serum creatinine level >200 umol/L, we analyzed 334 (92.3%) biopsies. Histology reports were reviewed and categorized into histoimmunological and nonimmunological changes. The immunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) no acute rejection (NR), (2) borderline changes (BC), and (3) subclinical rejection (SCR). Nonimmunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) chronicity including interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA), chronic T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), unspecified chronic lesions, and arterionephrosclerosis, (2) de novo glomerulopathy/recurrence of primary disease (RP), and (3) other clinically unsuspected lesions (acute pyelonephritis, calcineurin inhibitors toxicity, postinfective glomerulonephritis, and BK virus nephropathy). Risk factors associated with SCR were assessed. Results For the histoimmunological changes, 161 (48.2%) showed NR, 145 (43.4%) were BC, and 28 (8.4%) were SCR. These clinical events were more pronounced for the first 5 years; our data showed BC accounted for 59 (36.4%), 64 (54.2%), and 22 (40.7%) biopsies within <1 year, 1-5 years, and > 5 years, respectively (p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence for SCR was 6 (3.7%) biopsies in <1 year, 18 (15.3%) in 1-5 years, and 4 (7.4%) in >5 years after transplantation (p=0.003). For the nonimmunological changes, chronicity, de novo glomerulopathy/RP, and other clinically unsuspected lesions were seen in 40 (12%), 10 (3%), and 12 (3.6%) biopsies, respectively. Living-related donor recipients were associated with decreased SCR (p=0.007). Conclusions Despite having a stable renal function, our transplant recipients had a significant number of subclinical rejection on renal allograft biopsies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vidas Ž, Jurenec F, Lovrić E, Samardžija M. Kidney transplantation from a living donor to a mentally disabled recipient with bilateral angiomyolipomas-A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2018; 53:444-447. [PMID: 30567065 PMCID: PMC6275201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.11.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many centers do not perform transplantation in mentally disabled people. Our patient with progressive psychomotor developmental delay had bilateral angiomyolipomas. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE Three years ago she underwent a right nephrectomy for massive spontaneous hemorrhage. The left kidney had a large, well-vascularized angiomyolipoma ready at any moment to bleed spontaneously was functioning normally. Two renal transplantation centers in Croatia refused to transplant from the patient's donor mother. The transplantation team had concerns whether to transplant a kidney to a person unable to care for herself, about who would take complete care of the patient, including regular immunosuppressive therapy, and whether it was ethically justified to explant a functioning kidney, although affected by angiomyolipomas, from a patient who required no renal replacement therapy at the time. CONCLUSION We presented a successful kidney transplant in a mentally disabled person, clinical and ethical justifications for such a procedure, and a four-year post-transplant evaluation. Furthermore, in our opinion, renal transplantation in the mentally challenged needs to be referred to in literature exclusively as a relative contraindication instead of an absolute one, as has been practiced to date. This would facilitate transplantation teams deciding on kidney transplantation in mentally incapacitated individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Željko Vidas
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
| | - Franjo Jurenec
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
| | - Eva Lovrić
- Department of Pathology, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Marko Samardžija
- Clinic for Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones-Hughes T, Snowsill T, Haasova M, Coelho H, Crathorne L, Cooper C, Mujica-Mota R, Peters J, Varley-Campbell J, Huxley N, Moore J, Allwood M, Lowe J, Hyde C, Hoyle M, Bond M, Anderson R. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-594. [PMID: 27578428 DOI: 10.3310/hta20620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation. METHODS Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled. FUTURE WORK High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome. CONCLUSION Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jason Moore
- Exeter Kidney Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Matt Allwood
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Lowe
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mary Bond
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Haasova M, Snowsill T, Jones-Hughes T, Crathorne L, Cooper C, Varley-Campbell J, Mujica-Mota R, Coelho H, Huxley N, Lowe J, Dudley J, Marks S, Hyde C, Bond M, Anderson R. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-324. [PMID: 27557331 DOI: 10.3310/hta20610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation followed by induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES To systematically review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) and rabbit antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobuline,(®) Sanofi) as induction therapy and immediate-release tacrolimus [Adoport(®) (Sandoz); Capexion(®) (Mylan); Modigraf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Perixis(®) (Accord Healthcare); Prograf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Tacni(®) (Teva); Vivadex(®) (Dexcel Pharma)], prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf,(®) Astellas Pharma); belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix,(®) Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) [Arzip(®) (Zentiva), CellCept(®) (Roche Products), Myfenax(®) (Teva), generic MMF is manufactured by Accord Healthcare, Actavis, Arrow Pharmaceuticals, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Mylan, Sandoz and Wockhardt], mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus (Rapamune,(®) Pfizer) and everolimus (Certican,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as maintenance therapy in children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation. DATA SOURCES Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted to 7 January 2015 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science [via Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted to 15 January 2015 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Databases (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and EconLit (via EBSCOhost). REVIEW METHODS Titles and abstracts were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria, as were full texts of identified studies. Included studies were extracted and quality appraised. Data were meta-analysed when appropriate. A new discrete time state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed; graft function, and incidences of acute rejection and new-onset diabetes mellitus were used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four non-RCTs were included. The RCTs only evaluated BAS and tacrolimus (TAC). No statistically significant differences in key outcomes were found between BAS and placebo/no induction. Statistically significantly higher graft function (p < 0.01) and less biopsy-proven acute rejection (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.57) was found between TAC and ciclosporin (CSA). Only one cost-effectiveness study was identified, which informed NICE guidance TA99. BAS [with TAC and azathioprine (AZA)] was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) versus no induction (BAS was dominant). BAS (with CSA and MMF) was not predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus no induction (BAS was dominated). TAC (with AZA) was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus CSA (TAC was dominant). A model based on adult evidence suggests that at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000-30,000 per QALY, BAS and TAC are cost-effective in all considered combinations; MMF was also cost-effective with CSA but not TAC. LIMITATIONS The RCT evidence is very limited; analyses comparing all interventions need to rely on adult evidence. CONCLUSIONS TAC is likely to be cost-effective (vs. CSA, in combination with AZA) at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. Analysis based on one RCT found BAS to be dominant, but analysis based on another RCT found BAS to be dominated. BAS plus TAC and AZA was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY when all regimens were compared using extrapolated adult evidence. High-quality primary effectiveness research is needed. The UK Renal Registry could form the basis for a prospective primary study. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013544. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Lowe
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jan Dudley
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust), Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen Marks
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mary Bond
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dall'Agnol DJR, Corá LA, Teixeira MDCB, de Lima MB, Gama LA, Miranda JRDA, Américo MF. Gastrointestinal disorders after immunosuppression: an experimental model to evaluate the influence of monotherapy on motility parameters. Exp Physiol 2017; 102:924-933. [PMID: 28556421 DOI: 10.1113/ep086267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS What is the central question of this study? The aim was to propose an animal model for investigating the effects of immunosuppressive monotherapy on gastrointestinal motility using a non-invasive biomagnetic technique. What is main finding and its importance? In our experimental study, immunosuppressive drugs currently in use accelerated gastric emptying whilst increasing the frequency and amplitude of gastric contractions after treatment, except for Mycophenolate and azathioprine. Alternating current biosusceptometry is a useful tool to evaluate side-effects of drugs on the gastrointestinal tract, which will help in understanding the symptoms and improving clinical management of patients. The aim was to propose an animal model for investigating the effects of immunosuppressive monotherapy on gastrointestinal motility using a non-invasive biomagnetic technique. Male Wistar rats were randomly distributed into the following treatment groups: ciclosporin, tacrolimus, prednisone, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, everolimus, azathioprine and control. Each animal was treated for 14 days by gavage with dosages ranging from 1 to 20 mg kg-1 day-1 considering the area-to-volume ratio and hepatic metabolism. Gastrointestinal transit and gastric contractility measurements were evaluated by alternating current biosusceptometry before and after treatment. Gastric emptying was faster in animals treated with tacrolimus, prednisone, sirolimus and everolimus compared with control animals (126.7 ± 12.7 min). There was a significant increase in the frequency of contractions after ciclosporin, tacrolimus, azathioprine and sirolimus treatment compared with control animals (4.6 ± 0.3 cycles min-1 ). Increases in the amplitude of contraction were observed after treatment with tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus compared with control rats (34.9 ± 6.0 dB). The results showed that our animal model was suitable for demonstrating that most immunosuppressive drugs currently in use impaired at least one gastrointestinal motility parameter. As a non-invasive technique, alternating current biosusceptometry is a potentially useful tool for evaluation of side-effects of drugs in gastrointestinal tract, helping us to understand the symptoms to improve clinical management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denize Jussara Rupolo Dall'Agnol
- Postgraduate Program in Pharmacology and Biotechnology - São Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Maysa Bruno de Lima
- Institute of Biological Sciences and Health - Federal University of Mato Grosso - UFMT, Barra do Garças, Mato Grosso, Brazil
| | - Loyane Almeida Gama
- Postgraduate Program in Pharmacology and Biotechnology - São Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
| | - José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda
- Department of Physics and Biophysics - São Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Biosciences - Botucatu/SP, Brazil
| | - Madileine Francely Américo
- Institute of Biological Sciences and Health - Federal University of Mato Grosso - UFMT, Barra do Garças, Mato Grosso, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Huh KH, Lee JG, Ha J, Oh CK, Ju MK, Kim CD, Cho HR, Jung CW, Lim BJ, Kim YS. De novo low-dose sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017; 32:1415-1424. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongwon Ha
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Kwon Oh
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Man Ki Ju
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan-Duck Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Rae Cho
- Department of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Woong Jung
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Jin Lim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu Seun Kim
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Inflammation in Early Kidney Allograft Surveillance Biopsies With and Without Associated Tubulointerstitial Chronic Damage as a Predictor of Fibrosis Progression and Development of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies. Transplantation 2017; 101:1410-1415. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
24
|
Gatault P, Kamar N, Büchler M, Colosio C, Bertrand D, Durrbach A, Albano L, Rivalan J, Le Meur Y, Essig M, Bouvier N, Legendre C, Moulin B, Heng AE, Weestel PF, Sayegh J, Charpentier B, Rostaing L, Thervet E, Lebranchu Y. Reduction of Extended-Release Tacrolimus Dose in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Increases Risk of Rejection and Appearance of Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Randomized Study. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:1370-1379. [PMID: 27862923 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01744470) was to determine the efficacy and safety of two different doses of extended-release tacrolimus (TacER) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 4 and 12 mo after transplantation. Stable steroid-free KTRs were randomized (1:1) after 4 mo: Group A had a 50% reduction in TacER dose with a targeted TacER trough level (C0 ) >3 μg/L; group B had no change in TacER dose (TacER C0 7-12 μg/L). The primary outcome was estimated GFR at 1 year. Of 300 patients, the intent-to-treat analysis included 186 patients (group A, n = 87; group B, n = 99). TacER C0 was lower in group A than in group B at 6 mo (4.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.7 ± 3.9 μg/L, p < 0.0001) and 12 mo (5.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.1 μg/L, p < 0.0001). Estimated GFR was similar in both groups at 12 mo (group A, 56.0 ± 17.5 mL/min per 1.73 m²; group B, 56.0 ± 22.1 mL/min per 1.73 m²). More rejection episodes occurred in group A than group B (11 vs. 3; p = 0.016). At 1 year, subclinical inflammation occurred more frequently in group A than group B (inflammation score [i] >0: 21.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.047; tubulitis score [t] >0: 19.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.076; i + t: 1.14 ± 1.21 vs. 0.72 ± 1.01, p = 0.038). Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies appeared only in group A (6 vs. 0 patients, p = 0.008). TacER C0 should be maintained >7 μg/L during the first year after transplantation in low-immunological-risk, steroid-free KTRs receiving a moderate dose of mycophenolic acid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gatault
- EA4245 Dendritic Cells, Immunomodulation and Grafts, François-Rabelais University, Tours, France.,Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| | - N Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.,INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.,Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - M Büchler
- EA4245 Dendritic Cells, Immunomodulation and Grafts, François-Rabelais University, Tours, France.,Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| | - C Colosio
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - D Bertrand
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - A Durrbach
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - L Albano
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Nice, Nice, France
| | - J Rivalan
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Y Le Meur
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Brest, Brest, France
| | - M Essig
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - N Bouvier
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - C Legendre
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM Unité 845, Paris, France
| | - B Moulin
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - A-E Heng
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P-F Weestel
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - J Sayegh
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, CHU Angers, Angers, France
| | - B Charpentier
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - L Rostaing
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.,INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.,Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - E Thervet
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Georges-Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Y Lebranchu
- EA4245 Dendritic Cells, Immunomodulation and Grafts, François-Rabelais University, Tours, France.,Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vanhove T, Goldschmeding R, Kuypers D. Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions. Transplantation 2017; 101:713-726. [PMID: 27941433 PMCID: PMC7228593 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
All causes of renal allograft injury, when severe and/or sustained, can result in chronic histological damage of which interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are dominant features. Unless a specific disease process can be identified, what drives interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy progression in individual patients is often unclear. In general, clinicopathological factors known to predict and drive allograft fibrosis include graft quality, inflammation (whether "nonspecific" or related to a specific diagnosis), infections, such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and genetic factors. The incidence and severity of chronic histological damage have decreased substantially over the last 3 decades, but it is difficult to disentangle what effects individual innovations (eg, better matching and preservation techniques, lower CNI dosing, BK viremia screening) may have had. There is little evidence that CNI-sparing/minimization strategies, steroid minimization or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade result in better preservation of intermediate-term histology. Treatment of subclinical rejections has only proven beneficial to histological and functional outcome in studies in which the rate of subclinical rejection in the first 3 months was greater than 10% to 15%. Potential novel antifibrotic strategies include antagonists of transforming growth factor-β, connective tissue growth factor, several tyrosine kinase ligands (epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor), endothelin and inhibitors of chemotaxis. Although many of these drugs are mainly being developed and marketed for oncological indications and diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a number may hold promise in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, which could eventually lead to applications in renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vanhove
- 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2 Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3 Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine as Primary Immunosuppressant After Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Economics Evaluation. Am J Ther 2017; 23:e810-24. [PMID: 25299636 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000000150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Tacrolimus and cyclosporine are the major immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. Several studies have compared these 2 drugs, but the outcomes were not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in the treatment of renal transplantation and provide evidence for the selection of essential drugs. Trials were identified through a computerized literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Renal Group Specialized Register of randomized controlled trials, and Chinese Biomedical database. Two independent reviewers assessed trials for eligibility and quality and then extracted data. Data were extracted for patient and graft mortality, acute rejection, and adverse events. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. A decision tree model was populated with data from a literature review and used to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life years gained and incremental cost-effectiveness. Altogether, 6137 patients from 27 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of our analysis were that tacrolimus reduced the risks after renal transplantation of patient mortality, graft loss, acute rejection, and hypercholesterolemia. Nevertheless, tacrolimus increased the risk of new-onset diabetes. Pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that tacrolimus represented a more cost-effective treatment than does cyclosporine for the prevention of adverse events following renal transplant. Tacrolimus is an effective and safe immunosuppressive agent and it may be more cost-effective than cyclosporine for the primary prevention of graft rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, new-onset diabetes should be closely monitored during the medication period.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee J, Song SH, Lee JG, Kim BS, Huh KH, Kim YS. Sirolimus Combination with Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Immunological Risk: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2016. [DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2016.30.4.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Song
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Seun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Edinur HA, Manaf SM, Che Mat NF. Genetic barriers in transplantation medicine. World J Transplant 2016; 6:532-541. [PMID: 27683631 PMCID: PMC5036122 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The successful of transplantation is determined by the shared human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and ABO blood group antigens between donor and recipient. In recent years, killer cell receptor [i.e., killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)] and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene molecule (i.e., MICA) were also reported as important determinants of transplant compatibility. At present, several different genotyping techniques (e.g., sequence specific primer and sequence based typing) can be used to characterize blood group, HLA, MICA and KIR and loci. These molecular techniques have several advantages because they do not depend on the availability of anti-sera, cellular expression and have greater specificity and accuracy compared with the antibody-antigen based typing. Nonetheless, these molecular techniques have limited capability to capture increasing number of markers which have been demonstrated to determine donor and recipient compatibility. It is now possible to genotype multiple markers and to the extent of a complete sequencing of the human genome using next generation sequencer (NGS). This high throughput genotyping platform has been tested for HLA, and it is expected that NGS will be used to simultaneously genotype a large number of clinically relevant transplantation genes in near future. This is not far from reality due to the bioinformatics support given by the immunogenetics community and the rigorous improvement in NGS methodology. In addition, new developments in immune tolerance based therapy, donor recruitment strategies and bioengineering are expected to provide significant advances in the field of transplantation medicine.
Collapse
|
29
|
Thaunat O, Koenig A, Leibler C, Grimbert P. Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs on Humoral Allosensitization after Kidney Transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 27:1890-900. [PMID: 26872489 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2015070781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The negative effect of donor-specific antibodies on the success of solid transplant is now clearly established. However, the lack of effective treatment to prevent the development of antibody-mediated lesions deepens the need for clinicians to focus on primary prevention of de novo humoral allosensitization. Among the factors associated with the risk of developing de novo donor-specific antibodies, therapeutic immunosuppression is the most obvious parameter in which improvement is possible. Beyond compliance and the overall depth of immunosuppression, it is likely that the nature of the drugs is also crucial. Here, we provide an overview of the molecular effect of the various immunosuppressive drugs on B cell biology. Clinical data related to the effect of these drugs on de novo humoral allosensitization are also examined, providing a platform from which clinicians can optimize immunosuppression for prevention of de novo donor-specific antibody generation at the individual level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM UMR1111, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; and
| | - Alice Koenig
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM UMR1111, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; and
| | - Claire Leibler
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Centre de référence maladie rare Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Institut Francilien de recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation, INSERM U955, Université Paris Est Créteil, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Creteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Centre de référence maladie rare Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Institut Francilien de recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation, INSERM U955, Université Paris Est Créteil, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhao DQ, Li SW, Sun QQ. Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimens in Renal Transplantation: A Systemic Review. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:3-9. [PMID: 26915834 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppressive regimens have been used for preventing rejection after kidney transplantation. This review analyzes their merits and demerits compared with other conventional regimes from the aspects of acute rejection rate, graft function, as well as patient/graft survival rates. In general, SRL is mostly recommended to be used as conversion therapy from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) after kidney transplantation in most studies. Minimization or withdrawal of cyclosporine A (CsA) could also be considered when it was combined with SRL. SRL can replace mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and the CNI dose should be reduced appropriately in this setting. Quadruple maintenance regimens containing SRL need future study to clarify their superiority. De novo use of low-dose CNI combined with SRL has no apparent merits and thus is not recommended. De novo use of standard-dose CNI combined with SRL followed by maintenance, de novo use of CNI-free regimens, as well as SRL use in delayed graft function (DGF) patients who spare antibody induction and postpone CNI administration should also be avoided. SRL supports steroids withdrawal after kidney transplantation, and SRL combined with tacrolimus is recommended in this setting. Loading dose is recommended when initiating SRL treatment and its trough blood level should be routinely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Q Zhao
- Kidney Transplantation Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - S W Li
- Kidney Transplantation Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Q Q Sun
- Kidney Transplantation Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xie X, Jiang Y, Lai X, Xiang S, Shou Z, Chen J. mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 2015; 16:91. [PMID: 26126806 PMCID: PMC4486141 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-015-0078-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A number of studies have provided information regarding the risks and benefits of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I) combined with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) versus mycophenolic acid (MPA). Methods Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing mTOR-I to MPA as the primary immunosuppressive regimen in combination with CNI were selected and meta-analyzed. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials consisting of 4930 patients in total were included. No significant difference was observed in the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and patient death between the two groups. However, an increased risk of graft loss (relative risk (RR) = 1.20) and inferior graft function (creatinine clearance, weighted mean difference (WMD) = −2.41 μmol/L) were demonstrated in mTOR-I-treated patients. Patients treated with mTOR-I had a higher risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.32), dyslipidemia, proteinuria (RR = 1.79), peripheral edema (RR = 1.34), thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.97) and lymphocoele (RR = 1.80), but a lower risk of cytomegalovirus infection (RR = 0.40), malignancy (RR = 0.64) and leucopenia (RR = 0.43). There was no difference in diarrhea, anemia, urinary tract infection, polyoma virus infection and impaired wound healing when mTOR-I was compared with MPA. Conclusions mTOR-I showed no particular superiority to MPA. Notably, mTOR-I had an increased risk of graft loss when combined with CNI, even when combined with a reduced dose of CNI. Therefore, the optimal dosage strategies for mTOR-I and CNI need to be further explored. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xishao Xie
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yan Jiang
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Xiuxiu Lai
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Shilong Xiang
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Zhangfei Shou
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Zhou X, Workeneh B, Hu Z, Li R. Effect of immunosuppression on the human mesangial cell cycle. Mol Med Rep 2014; 11:910-6. [PMID: 25370945 PMCID: PMC4262500 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of immunosuppressive agents [tacrolimus (Tac), cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolic acid (MMF) and methylprednisone (MP)] on the proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptotic rate of human mesangial cells. Cultured human mesangial cells were treated with several concentrations of the immunosuppressive agents for 24, 48 or 72 h. Cell cycle progression, proliferation and apoptosis were analyzed using an MTT assay and flow cytometry. Tac and CsA significantly inhibited the proliferation of human mesangial cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Cell cycle analysis revealed that Tac and CsA arrested mesangial cells in the G0/G1 phase, preventing them from entering S phase. Similarly, MP inhibited human mesangial cell growth by causing cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase. MMF also inhibited mesangial cell proliferation, but accomplished this by preventing progression from S phase to the G2/M phase. The combination of MP and MMF synergistically inhibited mesangial cell proliferation. Tac, CsA, MP and MMF inhibited proliferation of human mesangial cells by blocking progression of the cell cycle. In conclusion, these agents, sequentially or in combination, may be used to effectively treat mesangial proliferative glomerular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshuang Zhou
- Department of Nephrology, Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P.R. China
| | - Biruh Workeneh
- Department of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhaoyong Hu
- Department of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rongshan Li
- Department of Nephrology, Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Goring SM, Levy AR, Ghement I, Kalsekar A, Eyawo O, L'Italien GJ, Kasiske B. A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of belatacept, cyclosporine and tacrolimus for immunosuppression therapy in adult renal transplant recipients. Curr Med Res Opin 2014; 30:1473-87. [PMID: 24628478 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.898140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Belatacept is a first in-class co-stimulation blocker developed for primary maintenance immunosuppression following renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to estimate the efficacy of belatacept relative to tacrolimus and cyclosporine among adults receiving a single kidney transplant. A systematic review was conducted of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and December 2013 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and unpublished study reports from two belatacept RCTs. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) methods were used to compare the efficacy measures, mortality, graft loss, acute rejection and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Heterogeneity was quantified using statistical metrics and potential sources were evaluated using meta-regression and subgroup analysis. A total of 28 RCTs comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine, and three comparing belatacept with cyclosporine, were identified. All three agents provided comparable graft and patient survival, despite a higher risk of acute rejection associated with belatacept and cyclosporine. Belatacept was associated with significant improvement in GFR versus cyclosporine. Compared with tacrolimus, this difference was clinically meaningful yet statistically non-significant. The probability of being the best treatment was highest for belatacept for graft survival (68%), patient survival (97%) and renal function (89%), and highest for tacrolimus for acute rejection (99%).Variability in donor, recipient, and trial characteristics was present in the included RCTs; however, minimal statistical heterogeneity was detected in the analysis of acute rejection, graft or patient survival, and none of the characteristics were found to be significantly associated with relative effect. Although the direction of effect of immunosuppressants on GFR was consistent across RCTs, precise estimation of its magnitude was limited by a small number of RCTs and heterogeneity in relative effect sizes. Clinicians often seek an alternative to CNIs due to their nephrotoxic effects. The results of this indirect comparison indicate that belatacept is an effective immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation among adults.
Collapse
|
35
|
The Interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in kidney transplantation. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:750602. [PMID: 24991565 PMCID: PMC4065724 DOI: 10.1155/2014/750602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Serial surveillance renal allograft biopsies have shown that early subclinical inflammation constitutes a risk factor for the development of interstitial fibrosis. More recently, it has been observed that persistent inflammation is also associated with fibrosis progression and chronic humoral rejection, two histological conditions associated with poor allograft survival. Treatment of subclinical inflammation with steroid boluses prevents progression of fibrosis and preserves renal function in patients treated with a cyclosporine-based regimen. Subclinical inflammation has been reduced after the introduction of tacrolimus based regimens, and it has been shown that immunosuppressive schedules that are effective in preventing acute rejection and subclinical inflammation may prevent the progression of fibrosis and chronic humoral rejection. On the other hand, minimization protocols are associated with progression of fibrosis, and noncompliance with the immunosuppressive regime constitutes a major risk factor for chronic humoral rejection. Thus, adequate immunosuppressive treatment, avoiding minimization strategies and reinforcing educational actions to prevent noncompliance, is at present an effective approach to combat the progression of fibrosis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Akoglu B, Lafferton B, Kalb S, Yosuf SE, Herrmann E, Zeuzem S, Goßmann J, Kachel HG, Scheuermann EH, Faust D. Rejection quantity in kidney transplant recipients is associated with increasing intracellular interleukin-2 in CD8+ T-cells. Transpl Immunol 2014; 31:17-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2014.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Revised: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
37
|
Gender-dependent predictable pharmacokinetic method for tacrolimus exposure monitoring in kidney transplant patients. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2014; 40:95-102. [DOI: 10.1007/s13318-014-0184-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2013] [Accepted: 02/21/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
38
|
Ibernon M, Moreso F, Serón D. Innate immunity in renal transplantation: The role of mannose-binding lectin. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2014; 28:21-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 10/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
39
|
High frequency of rejections in HIV-positive recipients of kidney transplantation: a single center prospective trial. Transplantation 2013; 94:1020-4. [PMID: 23169224 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31826c3947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is a single institution report of the incidence of combined acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) + acute cellular rejection (ACR) [mixed rejection] in HIV (+) kidney transplant recipients. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 92 HIV (+) patients who received a kidney transplant between 2001 and 2009. There were three cohorts: no rejection [n=26], ACR [n=53], and mixed rejections (ABMR and ACR) [n=13]. Immunosuppression comprised of basiliximab, cyclosporine, sirolimus, and steroid minimization. Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, t test for continuous variables, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to describe events. RESULTS Mixed rejections were seen in all 13 HIV (+) kidney transplant recipients (14%) with a median time to ABMR of 48 days. Acute cellular rejection occurred in 28% at 1 month and 55% at 12 months. eGFR was lower for recipients who experienced ABMR versus those experiencing ACR and those never experiencing rejection up to 3 years (14 ± 9.4 vs 19 ± 3.3 vs 29 ± 7.3 mL/min, respectively). Kaplan-Meier showed that graft survival up to 9 years was worse in recipients experiencing mixed rejection. Suboptimal donors with terminal creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL was associated with increased incidence of mixed rejections versus cellular rejections and no rejection (42% vs 17% vs. 8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our single center study showed a relatively higher incidence of mixed rejection compared with that reported for non-HIV transplant recipients. A donor terminal serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL predicted mixed rejection, which was associated with poor outcomes. Donor selection and optimization of immunosuppression may be critical in these patients.
Collapse
|
40
|
Suszynski TM, Gillingham KJ, Rizzari MD, Dunn TB, Payne WD, Chinnakotla S, Finger EB, Sutherland DER, Najarian JS, Pruett TL, Matas AJ, Kandaswamy R. Prospective randomized trial of maintenance immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:961-970. [PMID: 23432755 PMCID: PMC3621067 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Revised: 11/26/2012] [Accepted: 12/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 μg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 μg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 μg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Suszynski
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - K J Gillingham
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - M D Rizzari
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - T B Dunn
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - W D Payne
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - S Chinnakotla
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - E B Finger
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - J S Najarian
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - T L Pruett
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - A J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - R Kandaswamy
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chapman JR. Do protocol transplant biopsies improve kidney transplant outcomes? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2013; 21:580-6. [PMID: 23042026 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0b013e32835903f4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The research undertaken on 'protocol' renal transplant biopsies has provided a rich, if not the richest, approach to better understanding of the immune and nonimmune impacts upon the transplant. The purpose of this review is to detail how the direct benefit to the patient also lies in these renamed 'surveillance' biopsies. RECENT FINDINGS Undertaken at fixed time points after transplantation, biopsy provides individual diagnoses with which the clinician can vary immunosuppression both in intensity and in the type of agent used to modify pathological processes early in their course. Initial nonfunction from acute tubular necrosis, subclinical cellular and humoral rejection, calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, BK virus nephropathy and recurrent glomerulonephritis are all important diagnoses for which early intervention provides better therapeutic outcomes than delaying until they are clinically evident. SUMMARY This review provides the recent evidence that has convinced many transplant units to embark upon surveillance programmes for their patients in order to individualize their immunosuppression and thus gain better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy R Chapman
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Association of immunosuppressive maintenance regimens with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 2012; 93:73-81. [PMID: 22129761 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31823ae7db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of immunosuppressive regimens (ISRs) with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may be related with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recipient serostatus. METHODS We selected primary kidney transplant recipients from Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database (2000-2009) who were discharged with a functioning graft and were receiving an ISR including an antiproliferative drug and a calcineurin inhibitor as follows: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolate sodium+tacrolimus (TAC), MMF+cyclosporine A (CsA); mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)+TAC; and mTORi+CsA. Adjusted risks of PTLD, rejection, death, and graft failure were examined in all recipients and compared between EBV+ and EBV- recipients. RESULTS Of 114,025 recipients, 754 developed PTLD (5-year incidence of 0.84%). Adjusted hazard ratio for PTLD was 4.39 (95% CI: 3.60-5.37) for EBV- versus EBV+ recipients; and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03-1.90) for mTORi+TAC, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65-0.99) for MMF+CsA, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57-1.42) for mTORi+CsA, versus MMF+TAC users. In EBV- recipients, hazard ratio for PTLD was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.28-3.07) for mTORi+TAC, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.28-0.72) for MMF+CsA, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.39-1.80) for mTORi+CsA users versus MMF+TAC. No difference was seen in EBV+ recipient groups. Rejection rates were higher among MMF+CsA recipients in both EBV groups. Death and graft failure risk were increased in all EBV+ISR groups, while in EBV- these risks were only increased in mTORi+TAC group versus MMF+TAC. CONCLUSIONS In EBV- recipients, immunosuppression with mTORi+TAC was associated with increased risk of PTLD, death, and graft failure, while MMF+CsA use was associated with a trend to increased risk of rejection, lower PTLD risk, and similar risk for graft failure when compared with MMF+TAC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Chhabra D, Skaro AI, Leventhal JR, Dalal P, Shah G, Wang E, Gallon L. Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:504-12. [PMID: 22282478 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.06940711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen to improve long-term renal allograft function and graft survival is yet to be determined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This observational study prospectively compared tacrolimus/sirolimus with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients using a prednisone-free regimen with over 8.5 years of follow-up. Patients received methylprednisonlone and anti-IL2 receptor antagonist (Basiliximab) induction and were blindly randomized to either the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (n=45) or tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=37) groups. Outcome measures included patient and renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and estimated GFR. RESULTS The tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group compared with the tacrolimus/sirolimus group had overall better renal allograft survival (91% versus 70%, P=0.02); 13 patients (35.1%) in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group and 8 patients (17.8%) in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (P=0.07). By 3 months post-transplant, estimated GFR was significantly lower in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group (47.7 versus 59.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), P=0.0002), and this trend persisted throughout the follow-up period. Also, the slope of decline in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group was significantly steeper than in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that, in a prednisone-free immunosuppressive regimen, long-term renal graft survival and function are significantly worse in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group than the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group. The synergistic nephrotoxic effect and higher acute rejection rates in the tacrolimus/sirolimus compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group adversely affect graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darshika Chhabra
- Kidney Transplant, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pengel LHM, Liu LQ, Morris PJ. Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Int 2011; 24:1216-30. [PMID: 21955006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01357.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
mTOR inhibitors have been associated with wound complications and lymphoceles. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare these outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients. Relevant medical databases were searched to identify RCTs in solid organ transplantation comparing mTOR inhibitors with an alternative therapy reporting on wound complications and/or lymphoceles. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. Pooled analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirty-seven RCTs in kidney, heart, simultaneous pancreas-kidney and liver transplantation were included. Pooled analyses showed a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 1.77, CI 1.31-2.37) and lymphoceles (OR 2.07, CI 1.62-2.65) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). There was also a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 3.00, CI 1.61-5.59) and lymphoceles (OR 2.13, CI 1.57-2.90) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with antimetabolites. Heart transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors together with CNIs also reported more wound complications (OR 1.82, CI 1.15-2.87). We found a higher incidence of wound complications and lymphoceles after kidney transplantation and a higher incidence of wound complications after heart transplantation for immunosuppressive regimens that included mTOR inhibitors from the time of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liset H M Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Oláh AV, Asztalos L, Ivády G, Varga E, Kovács AM, Kappelmayer J, Varga J. Monitoring of mycophenolic acid and kidney function during combined immunosuppressive therapy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49:1849-53. [PMID: 21848499 DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2011.678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mycophenolic acid (MPA), a selective inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation, has lately been used to improve renal function and prolong graft survival in renal transplanted patients. Still, there is no consensus considering the recommended dosing and the therapeutic range of MPA. METHODS To estimate the safe therapeutic range of MPA, its plasma level and indicators of kidney function were measured in 216 patients (138 male, 78 female, age 46 ± 12 years) 67 ± 46 months after transplantation. Besides MPA, patients received cyclosporine (Group A, n=122) or tacrolimus (Group B, n=77). Seventeen patients (Group C) were treated with MPA in combination with everolimus or sirolimus. Plasma MPA was measured by enzyme inhibition assay. RESULTS In the whole study group MPA level increased with the dose of MPA (p=0.013). MPA level was below the therapeutic range in 40% (Group A) and 45% (Group B) of patients, respectively. MPA was 1.9 ± 1.56 mg/L in Group A, 2.4 ± 1.69 mg/L in Group B. In Group A MPA level increased and cyclosporine decreased with the progress of renal disease. CONCLUSIONS Increasing MPA/cyclosporine ratio at more severe stages of chronic kidney disease was tolerable for the patients and rejection could be avoided. Tubular damage detected by urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase did not correlate with the MPA level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna V Oláh
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Pathology, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Subclinical rejection in renal transplants is associated with low serum mannose-binding lectin levels. Kidney Int Suppl (2011) 2011; 1:36-39. [PMID: 25018901 PMCID: PMC4089683 DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2011.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Surveillance biopsies have contributed to the understanding of the natural history of renal allograft lesions. Subclinical rejection, defined as the presence of histological lesions, indistinguishable from acute rejection in stable grafts, is associated with progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. The prevalence of subclinical rejection has decreased as more powerful immunosuppressive treatments have been introduced, suggesting that subclinical rejection represents the degree of control of the alloimmune response. However, non-immune factors such as donor age are also associated with the prevalence of subclinical rejection, suggesting that kidneys from older donors are more susceptible to insult and have a reduced capacity for tissue regeneration. Innate immunity has a crucial role in the modulation of the inflammatory response during infection and tissue damage. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is an innate immune protein, the polymorphisms of which are associated with infection, low-grade inflammation, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between MBL and disease is complex. For example, low MBL level is associated with higher risk for diabetes, whereas in patients with diabetes, high MBL level is associated with more severe renal damage. In renal transplant patients, low MBL levels are associated with an increased prevalence of infection and diabetes, whereas high MBL levels are associated with shortened graft survival. Although MBL is not clearly associated with prevalence of acute rejection, surveillance biopsy studies have shown that low MBL levels are associated with subclinical rejection in kidney and the heart, suggesting that MBL modulates the injury–repair process of the allograft.
Collapse
|
47
|
Guerra G, Ciancio G, Gaynor JJ, Zarak A, Brown R, Hanson L, Sageshima J, Roth D, Chen L, Kupin W, Tueros L, Ruiz P, Livingstone AS, Burke GW. Randomized trial of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22:1758-68. [PMID: 21807891 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2011010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal long-term regimen for immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We conducted a randomized trial involving 150 kidney transplant recipients to compare tacrolimus/sirolimus, tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine/sirolimus. All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. Median follow-up was 8 yr post-transplant. Acute rejection (AR) occurred significantly less often among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (30%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (28%). Mean estimated GFR was consistently higher in the tacrolimus/MMF arm, especially after controlling for donor age in a multivariable model during the first 36 mo (P ≤ 0.008). The rate of dying with a functioning graft was significantly higher among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (26%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (4%). We did not observe significant differences in actuarial graft survival at 8 yr post-transplant between the groups. Patient noncompliance seemed responsible for 45% (13/29) of observed graft failures, with 11 of these occurring after 36 mo. Significantly more viral infections, protocol violations, and need for antilipid therapy occurred among patients receiving sirolimus, but we did not observe differences between the groups with regard to infections requiring hospitalization or new-onset diabetes. Taken together, these results suggest that maintenance therapy with tacrolimus/MMF is more favorable than either tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/sirolimus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle Guerra
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, P.O. Box 012440 (R-440), Miami, FL 33101, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Henderson LK, Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR. Surveillance protocol kidney transplant biopsies: their evolving role in clinical practice. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:1570-5. [PMID: 21797971 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03677.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Protocol renal allograft biopsies at fixed time points from transplantation have aided research and provided insights into the pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury. Their role is evolving from research to a clinical management tool needed to detect subclinical pathology requiring treatment adjustment. They frequently reveal unexpected findings and influence therapy in the majority of patients. Detection of subclinical rejection (SCR) remains important despite declining prevalence with triple therapy, the evidence favors treatment, if found. Surveillance biopsies in steroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal programs provide an important safety net against the increased rates of late acute and SCR. Individualization of therapy in high-risk patients and safe reduction of immunosuppression in standard risk individuals becomes possible. Other potentially reversible chronic pathologies that may be detected, include chronic T-cell or antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, BK virus-associated nephropathy, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and CNI nephrotoxicity, allowing modifications of therapy to limit ongoing graft injury. Biopsy is safe and inexpensive compared with costs of earlier graft failure and return to dialysis. This review summarizes current evidence on use of surveillance histology for the clinical practice of renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L K Henderson
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Esposito S, Meregalli E, Daleno C, Ghio L, Tagliabue C, Valzano A, Serra D, Galeone C, Edefonti A, Principi N. An open-label, randomized clinical trial assessing immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 MF59-adjuvanted vaccine administered sequentially or simultaneously with seasonal virosomal-adjuvanted influenza vaccine to paediatric kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26:2018-24. [PMID: 20974645 PMCID: PMC7313880 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2010] [Revised: 09/19/2010] [Accepted: 10/01/2010] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of the 2009 A/H1N1 MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine, administered sequentially or simultaneously with the seasonal 2009-10 virosomal-adjuvanted influenza vaccine, to paediatric kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Thirty-two children and adolescents with transplanted kidneys and 32 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were randomized 1:1 to receive the pandemic vaccine upon enrolment and the seasonal vaccine 1 month later (16 transplant recipients and 16 healthy controls), or to receive the two vaccines simultaneously upon enrolment (16 transplant recipients and 16 healthy controls). RESULTS When the pandemic vaccine was administered sequentially to the seasonal vaccine, it was significantly less immunogenic in the patients than in the controls (P < 0.05); when it was administered together with the seasonal vaccine, the immune response of both patients (P < 0.05) and controls (P < 0.05) was significantly greater than when it was administered sequentially. Seroconversion rates and the geometric mean titres of all of the seasonal antigens were significantly lower in the patients, regardless of the type of vaccine administration (P < 0.05). Simultaneous administration was associated with a better immune response against A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 antigens in both patients and controls, and did not increase the mild local and systemic reactions. No impact on renal function was observed. CONCLUSIONS Paediatric kidney transplant recipients have a lower immune response to the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 MF59-adjuvanted and seasonal virosomal-adjuvanted influenza vaccines than healthy controls. The simultaneous administration of the two vaccines seems to increase immune response to both pandemic and seasonal A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 antigens, and has the same safety profile as that of the pandemic vaccine administered sequentially to the seasonal vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Esposito
- Department of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Meregalli
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Daleno
- Department of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Ghio
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Tagliabue
- Department of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Valzano
- Department of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Serra
- Department of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Galeone
- Department of Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
- Department of Occupational Health “Clinica del Lavoro Luigi Devoto”, Section of Medical Statistics “Giulio A. Maccacaro”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Edefonti
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sandrini S, Setti G, Bossini N, Chiappini R, Valerio F, Mazzola G, Maffeis R, Nodari F, Cancarini G. Early (fifth day) vs. late (sixth month) steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients treated with Neoral(®) plus Rapamune(®): four-yr results of a randomized monocenter study. Clin Transplant 2011; 24:669-77. [PMID: 20030684 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01171.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The most advisable timing for steroid withdrawal (CSWD) after renal transplantation (Tx) is still an open issue. This randomized study has compared early CSWD (at day 5) with late (at month 6) in patients under Neoral + Sirolimus. The primary end point was the percentage of success in CSWD at month 48. Ninety-six transplants from deceased donors were randomized to withdraw steroids either early (n = 49) or late (n = 47). At four yr, the two strategies were comparable for: success in CSWD (65% in both), graft survival (95% and 98%), patient survival (92% and 96%) creatininemia (1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL), side effects, being still on Sirolimus + Neoral (69% and 74%), reversibility of rejection (AR) (all cases), severity of AR (grade 1A/1B: 81% and 63%). The major differences were incidence of AR: at month twelve (48% vs. 30%, p < 0.04), at 48 (53% and 33%, p < 0.03); timing of AR (72 ± 86 d vs. 202 ± 119 d, p < 0.0001). The timing of CSWD influences neither the rate of successful CSWD nor the long-term results. However, early suspension causes a higher AR rate, mostly arising within month one, but always responsive to steroids. Yet, the early appearance of AR can make patient management easier and safer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Sandrini
- Division of Nephrology, A.O. Spedali Civili and University, Brescia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|