The role of alemtuzumab in facilitating maintenance immunosuppression minimization following solid organ transplantation

Engineering for Success: Approaches to Improve Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors

While impressive clinical responses have been observed using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19+ hematologic malignancies, limited clinical benefit has been observed using CAR T cells for a variety of solid tumors. Results of clinical studies have highlighted several obstacles which CAR T cells face in the context of solid tumors, including insufficient homing to tumor sites, lack of expansion and persistence, encountering a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and heterogeneous antigen expression. In this review, we review clinical outcomes and discuss strategies to improve the antitumor activity of CAR T cells for solid tumors.

The divergent roles of macrophages in solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the phenotype and function of macrophages in the context of solid organ transplantation and will focus on fundamental insights into their paradoxical pro-inflammatory versus suppressive function. We will also discuss the therapeutic potential of regulatory macrophages in tolerance induction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Macrophages are emerging as an essential element of solid organ transplantation. Macrophages are involved in the pathogenesis of ischemia reperfusion injury, as well as both acute and chronic rejection, exacerbating injury through secretion of inflammatory effectors and by amplifying adaptive immune responses. Notably, not all responses associated with macrophages are deleterious to the graft, and graft protection can in fact be conferred by macrophages. This has been attributed to the presence of macrophages with tissue-repair capabilities, as well as the effects of regulatory macrophages.

SUMMARY

The explosion of new information on the role of macrophages in solid organ transplantation has opened up new avenues of research and the possibility of therapeutic intervention. However, the role of myeloid cells in graft rejection, resolution of rejection and tissue repair remains poorly understood. A better understanding of plasticity and regulation of monocyte polarization is vital for the development of new therapies for the treatment of acute and chronic transplant rejection.

Incidence and management of leukopenia/neutropenia in 233 kidney transplant patients following single dose alemtuzumab induction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and management strategies for post-transplant leukopenia/neutropenia in kidney recipients receiving alemtuzumab induction during the first year following transplantation.

METHODS

We prospectively identified 233 adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation with alemtuzumab induction at a single institution. The incidence and severity of leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤2500/mm(3)) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≤500/mm(3)) were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation. We determined any association with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, graft rejection, and infections requiring hospitalization. We also reviewed interventions performed, including medication adjustments, treatment with granulocyte stimulating factor, and hospitalization.

RESULTS

The combined incidence of either leukopenia or neutropenia was 47.5% (n = 114/233) with an average WBC nadir of 1700 ± 50/mm(3) at 131.0 ± 8.5 days and an average ANC nadir of 1500 ± 100/mm(3) at 130.4 ± 9.6 days. No significant difference in graft rejection, CMV infection, or infections requiring hospitalization was found in the leukopenia/neutropenia group vs the normal WBC group (P = .3). The most common intervention performed for leukopenia/neutropenia group was prophylactic medication adjustment. Six patients (5.2%) required a change in >1 medication. The majority of these patients also required granulocyte stimulating factor (61.5%; 32/52), with an average of 2.5 doses given. A total of 25 patients (21.9%) required hospitalization due to leukopenia/neutropenia with an average length of stay of 6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplant patients receiving alemtuzumab induction required significant interventions due to leukopenia/neutropenia in the first year post-transplantation. These results suggest the need for additional studies aimed at defining the optimum management strategies of leukopenia/neutropenia in this population.

Recollective homeostasis and the immune consequences of peritransplant depletional induction therapy

One's cellular immune repertoire is composed of lymphocytes in multiple stages of maturation - the dynamic product of their responses to antigenic challenges and the homeostatic contractions necessary to accommodate immune expansions within physiologic norms. Given that alloreactivity is predominantly a cross-reactive phenomenon that is stochastically distributed throughout the overall T-cell repertoire, one's allospecific repertoire is similarly made up of cells in a variety of differentiation states. As such, the continuous expansion and elimination of activated memory populations, producing a 'recollective homeostasis' of sorts, has the potential over time to alter the maturation state and effector composition of both ones protective and alloreactive T-cell repertoire. Importantly, a T cell's maturation state significantly influences its response to numerous immunomodulatory therapies used in organ transplantation, including depletional antibody induction. In this review, we discuss clinically utilized depletional induction strategies, how their use alters a transplant recipient's cellular immune repertoire, and how a recipient's repertoire influences the clinical effects of induction therapy.

Adoptive cell therapy for sarcoma

Current therapy for sarcomas, though effective in treating local disease, is often ineffective for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. To improve outcomes, novel approaches are needed and cell therapy has the potential to meet this need since it does not rely on the cytotoxic mechanisms of conventional therapies. The recent successes of T-cell therapies for hematological malignancies have led to renewed interest in exploring cell therapies for solid tumors such as sarcomas. In this review, we will discuss current cell therapies for sarcoma with special emphasis on genetic approaches to improve the effector function of adoptively transferred cells.

Clinical description and evolution of renal transplant pediatric patients treated with alemtuzumab

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the most effective treatment for children with end-stage renal disease. Recent work suggests that induction with alemtuzumab in the pediatric population permits the use of lower doses of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. In addition, it has a low cost compared with other induction therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a clinical description of pediatric renal transplant patients comparing induction protocols to evaluate graft and patient survival, infections complications, and lymphoproliferative diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive and retrospective study, of evaluated pediatric renal transplant patients between 2006 and 2010.

RESULTS

The agents for induction therapy were: alemtuzumab (61.5%), daclizumab (19.25%), and thymoglobulin (19.25%). Graft survival was better among the alemtuzumab group (87.5%) compared with the other two induction therapies (80%). The frequency of acute rejection episodes during the first year posttransplantation as well as chronic rejection was lower among the alemtuzumab group. Cytomegalovirus infection was noted in 30% of patients with greater frequency among those induced with alemtuzumab.

CONCLUSION

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab was safe in a pediatric population not predisposing to a greater risk of acute or chronic rejection. Except for a greater incidence of Cytomegalovirus, there was no difference in other complications.

Post-transplant repopulation of naïve and memory T cells in blood and lymphoid tissue after alemtuzumab-mediated depletion in heart-transplanted cynomolgus monkeys

Repopulation of memory T cells (Tmem) in allograft recipients after lymphodepletion is a major barrier to transplant tolerance induction. Ineffective depletion of naïve T cells (Tn) and Tmem may predispose to repopulation of Tmem after transplantation. Cynomolgus macaque monkeys given heart allografts were lymphodepleted using Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H; anti-CD52). Peripheral blood (PB) and lymph nodes (LN) were analyzed for CD95(-) (Tn) and CD95(+) cells (Tmem), one day, one month and up to three months after Alemtuzumab infusion. CD52 expression, susceptibility to Alemtuzumab cytotoxicity and pro-apoptotic caspase-3 were evaluated in Tn and Tmem. In vivo, Alemtuzumab induction profoundly depleted lymphocytes in PB (99% reduction) but exerted a lesser effect in LN (70% reduction), with similar depletion of Tn and Tmem subsets. After transplantation, Tmem comprised the majority of lymphocytes in PB and LN. In vitro, LN T cells were more resistant to Alemtuzumab-mediated cytotoxicity than PB lymphocytes. CD4(+) Tn and Tmem were equally susceptible to Alemtuzumab-mediated cytotoxicity, whereas CD8(+) Tn were more resistant than CD8(+) Tmem. However, no significant differences in CD52 expression between lymphocyte subsets in PB and LN were observed. Caspase-3 expression was higher in PB than LN T cells. CD4(+) and CD8(+) Tn expressed lower levels of Caspase-3 than Tmem, in both PB and LN. Thus, after Alemtuzumab infusion, residual Tn in secondary lymphoid tissue may predispose to rapid recovery of Tmem in allograft recipients.

Alemtuzumab for cytolytic induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To review available evidence about the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab for induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were conducted. Key search terms included alemtuzumab, Campath-1H, CD52, lymphocyte, cytolytic, induction, immunosuppression, rejection, and cardiac transplantation. Additional pertinent data were identified through a search of abstracts from major transplant meetings.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language articles and abstracts identified from the data sources were evaluated. All primary data were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the safety or efficacy of alemtuzumab for induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant patients. One retrospective cohort, 1 case series, 1 case-control series, and 1 open-label trial were identified and included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Acute cellular rejection occurs in 40% to 70% of heart transplant recipients within the first 6 months after transplant and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Depleting and nondepleting antibodies have displayed positive outcomes in inducing immunosuppression; however, the ideal induction strategy that balances efficacy and toxicity remains elusive. Alemtuzumab, a cytolytic anti-CD52 antibody, has been used to induce immunosuppression in kidney, pancreas, liver, intestine, and lung transplant recipients, and its use in heart transplant has been investigated. Studies of use of alemtuzumab to induce immunosuppression in heart transplant patients have shown low rates of rejection; however, it has not been directly compared with other immunosuppression-inducing agents and safety data are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Although alemtuzumab may be a practical option for inducing immunosuppression, data are insufficient to recommend its routine use in deference to more established agents. Large, randomized clinical trials with extended durations of follow-up must be conducted to characterize its efficacy and safety further.

Pharmacotherapy of Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation has become a viable treatment therapy for end-stage lung disease patients. The most common etiologies of end-stage lung disease, which can require a transplant are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). Listing criteria are institution and program specific. Approximately 1500 lung transplants were performed in 2008; and at 5 years post transplant, one-half are expected to survive. The surgery itself is associated with various complications, including surgical, infectious, and mechanical. Immunosuppression is paramount to the management of these patients, the goal being prevention of T cell activation to prevent rejection of the new organ. The patients commonly receive an induction agent with a T cell depleting antibody and high-dose corticosteroids. Maintenance immunosuppression begins immediately after the surgery, consisting of a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite, and corticosteroids. Side effect profiles from the various agents will determine the choice of agents, and patients may have modifications throughout the therapy. The role of the pharmacist spans the inpatient management of acute complications to medication selection, management of maintenance immunosuppression, as well as monitoring for adverse drug reactions and drug–drug interactions. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach must be taken to ensure the best outcomes for this patient population.

Approaching the promise of operational tolerance in clinical transplantation

Long-term acceptance of transplanted organs without requirement for indefinite immunosuppression remains the ultimate goal of transplant clinicians and scientists. This clinical state of allograft acceptance termed "operational tolerance" has been elusive in routine practice. However, there are published reports of recipients where immunosuppression has been discontinued, by intention or patient noncompliance, in which the outcome is a nondestructive immune response and normal function. The question now arises how clinical operational tolerance might be achieved in the majority of recipients. This review provides an overview of current approaches to achieve operational tolerance, including the use of donor bone marrow and depletion of recipient T cells and the resistance of liver transplants to rejection. It also describes the key role of clinical immune monitoring and future approaches to tolerance induction including inhibition of T-cell signaling, manipulation of costimulatory pathways, and expansion of regulatory T cells. The principles of these experimental approaches may ultimately be extended to provide safe and effective control of transplant rejection and induction of clinical operational tolerance.

Clinical transplantation tolerance

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for many if not most causes of end-stage organ failure. Over 20,000 organ transplant procedures were performed in the USA in 2009 to treat patients with failed or failing kidneys, livers, hearts, lungs, and intestines, and there remain 85,000 individuals waiting on the transplant list. Currently, in the USA, there are over 170,000 individuals living with a transplanted organ. Virtually, all of these individuals receive maintenance immunosuppression in an attempt to maximize the function and survival of the transplanted organ. However, it is clear that the long-term use of immunosuppressive agents is associated with an extensive list of undesirable side effects that have the potential to limit the survival of the patient and transplanted organ as well as to compromise quality of life. Although the ability to induce reproducibly a state of robust, stable tolerance would address this problem, tolerance remains an infrequent event in clinical transplantation that is largely a consequence of chance. Factors limiting the broader investigation of clinical transplantation tolerance include the lack of therapeutic regimens known to favor tolerance in humans, the lack of validated assays or biomarkers predictive of tolerance, and concerns about the safety and ethics of complete withdrawal of immunosuppression given the very good results achievable with current immunosuppression. Despite these barriers, a number of investigators have continued to conduct well-designed and carefully supervised studies with the long-term goal of making clinical transplantation tolerance more feasible. The aim of this review is to summarize the status of these studies.

Clinical operational tolerance after renal transplantation: current status and future challenges

In solid organ transplantation, the achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state [also referred to as clinical operational tolerance (COT)] represents the ultimate goal. Although COT is feasible and safe in selected cases after liver transplantation, it is an exceptional finding after other types of solid organ transplantation. In the field of renal transplantation (RT), approximately 100 cases of COT have been reported to date, mainly in patients who were not compliant with their immunosuppressive regimens or in individuals who had previously received a bone marrow transplant for hematological disorders. On the basis of promising results obtained in animal models, several tolerogenic protocols have been attempted in humans, but most have failed to achieve robust and stable COT after RT. Molecule-based regimens have been largely ineffective, whereas cell-based regimens have provided some encouraging results. In these latter regimens, apart from standard IS, patients usually receive perioperative infusion of donor bone marrow-derived stem cells, which are able to interact with the immune cells of the host and mitigate their response to engraftment. Unfortunately, most renal transplant patients who developed acute rejection-occurring either during the weaning protocol or after complete withdrawal of IS-eventually lost their grafts. Currently, the immune monitoring necessary for predicting the presence and persistence of donor-specific unresponsiveness is not available. Overall, the present review will provide a conceptual framework for COT and conclude that stable and robust COT after RT remains an elusive goal and that the different strategies attempted to date are not yet reproducibly safe or effective.

Kidney transplantation achievements in Mongolia

Between August 2006 and August 2009, 33 patients with end-stage renal disease were the recipients of kidney transplantations. The donors were living related 29 operations with 4 recipients of 2 deceased donors following accidents with cardiac arrest controlled after permission by the next of kin. We used standard techniques for the donor and recipient operations. All recipients were prescribed 1 dose of alemtuzumab (Campath 1 H 20-30 mg), peroperatively preceded by 500 mg methylprednisolone. In 2 recipients, a second infusion of Campath 1 was administered on postoperative day 2. On postoperative day 3, we prescribed monotherapy with either cyclosporine (n=29) at a starting dose of 7 mg/kg body weight or tacrolimus (n=6) at a starting dose of 0.7 mg/kg body weight. With the exception of patients treated for an acute rejection episode, no patient received steroid therapy. There were 7 acute rejection episodes, which were treated with 3 consecutive daily doses of methylprednisolone (250 mg). The 1-year patient survival was 94% and 2-year graft survival, 84.8%. We concluded that the use of Campath 1 together with a non-steroid maintenance immunosuppressive regimen provided acceptable graft and patient survival in our developing country.

Alemtuzumab induction prior to cardiac transplantation with lower intensity maintenance immunosuppression: one-year outcomes

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab (C-1H) prior to cardiac transplantation (CTX) may allow for lower intensity maintenance immunosuppression. This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent CTX at a single institution from January 2001 until April 2009 and received no induction versus induction with C-1H on a background of tacrolimus and mycophenolate. Those with C-1H received dose-reduced calcineurin inhibitor and no steroids. A total of 220 patients were included, 110 received C-1H and 110 received no induction. Recipient baseline characteristics, donor age and gender were not different between the two groups. Mean tacrolimus levels (ng/mL) for C-1H versus no induction: months 1-3 (8.5 vs. 12.9), month 4-6 (10.2 vs. 13.0), month 7-9 (10.2 vs. 11.9) and month 10-12 (9.9 vs. 11.3) were all significantly lower for the C-1H group, p < 0.001. There were no differences between the C-1H and no induction groups at 12 months for overall survival 85.1% versus 93.6% p = 0.09, but freedom from significant rejection was significantly higher for the C-1H group, 84.5% versus 51.6%, p < 0.0001. In conclusion, induction therapy after CTX with C-1H results in a similar 12 month survival, but a greater freedom from rejection despite lower calcineurin levels and without the use of steroids.

Operational tolerance after liver transplantation

The achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state after transplantation represents the ultimate goal of any immunosuppressive regimen. While clinical operational tolerance (COT) remains the exception after other types of solid organ transplantation, several cases of COT have been described after liver transplantation (LT). Overall, the experience gained so far worldwide demonstrates that COT can be achieved safely in one quarter of selected individuals, irrespective of the immunological background of donor and recipient, patient age, indication for LT, study endpoint, length of the weaning period and of pre/post-weaning follow-up, presence or not of chimerism. However, most transplant physicians still believe that the achievement of COT is still out of reach for the majority of LT recipients because of the potential risk for transplant survival, the non-randomized nature of most of the studies reported so far, and the selective nature of the patients enrolled in such studies, making them non-representative of the whole population of LT recipients. Despite these concerns, the present article demonstrates that this attitude is potentially no longer justified, given the growing evidence that a permanent and stable IS-free state can be achieved in a proportion of individuals who have received a LT for non-immune mediated liver diseases.