1
|
Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Senejohnny DM, Kamburova EG, Wisse BW, Reteig L, Gruijters ML, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Melchers RCA, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Bemelman FJ, Senev A, Naesens M, Heidt S, Otten HG. Determination of the clinical relevance of donor epitope-specific HLA-antibodies in kidney transplantation. HLA 2024; 103:e15346. [PMID: 38239046 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, survival rates are still partly impaired due to the deleterious effects of donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, not all luminex-defined DSA appear to be clinically relevant. Further analysis of DSA recognizing polymorphic amino acid configurations, called eplets or functional epitopes, might improve the discrimination between clinically relevant vs. irrelevant HLA antibodies. To evaluate which donor epitope-specific HLA antibodies (DESAs) are clinically important in kidney graft survival, relevant and irrelevant DESAs were discerned in a Dutch cohort of 4690 patients using Kaplan-Meier analysis and tested in a cox proportional hazard (CPH) model including nonimmunological variables. Pre-transplant DESAs were detected in 439 patients (9.4%). The presence of certain clinically relevant DESAs was significantly associated with increased risk on graft loss in deceased donor transplantations (p < 0.0001). The antibodies recognized six epitopes of HLA Class I, 3 of HLA-DR, and 1 of HLA-DQ, and most antibodies were directed to HLA-B (47%). Fifty-three patients (69.7%) had DESA against one donor epitope (range 1-5). Long-term graft survival rate in patients with clinically relevant DESA was 32%, rendering DESA a superior parameter to classical DSA (60%). In the CPH model, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of clinically relevant DESAs was 2.45 (1.84-3.25) in deceased donation, and 2.22 (1.25-3.95) in living donation. In conclusion, the developed model shows the deleterious effect of clinically relevant DESAs on graft outcome which outperformed traditional DSA-based risk analysis on antigen level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elena G Kamburova
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Reteig
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje L Gruijters
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rowena C A Melchers
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garrity C, Arzi B, Haus B, Lee CA, Vapniarsky N. A Fresh Glimpse into Cartilage Immune Privilege. Cartilage 2022; 13:119-132. [PMID: 36250484 PMCID: PMC9924976 DOI: 10.1177/19476035221126349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of degenerative cartilage disorders in young patients is a growing public concern worldwide. Cartilage's poor innate regenerative capacity has inspired the exploration and development of cartilage replacement treatments such as tissue-engineered cartilages and osteochondral implants as potential solutions to cartilage loss. The clinical application of tissue-engineered implants is hindered by the lack of long-term follow-up demonstrating efficacy, biocompatibility, and bio-integration. The historically reported immunological privilege of cartilage tissue was based on histomorphological observations pointing out the lack of vascularity and the presence of a tight extracellular matrix. However, clinical studies in humans and animals do not unequivocally support the immune-privilege theory. More in-depth studies on cartilage immunology are needed to make clinical advances such as tissue engineering more applicable. This review analyzes the literature that supports and opposes the concept that cartilage is an immune-privileged tissue and provides insight into mechanisms conferring various degrees of immune privilege to other, more in-depth studied tissues such as testis, eyes, brain, and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Garrity
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology
and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Boaz Arzi
- Department of Surgical and Radiological
Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA,
USA
| | - Brian Haus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Cassandra A. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Natalia Vapniarsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology
and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA,Natalia Vapniarsky, Department of
Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, One
Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cen M, Wang R, Kong W, Deng H, Lei W, Chen J. ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14050. [PMID: 32713064 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation is nowadays a routine procedure to expand living donor pool. The past decades have seen the evolution of desensitization protocol and immunosuppression regimen. Despite increased bleeding events, infectious complications, and rejection episodes reported in some studies, favorable graft and patient survival rate are now achieved, regardless of various protocols among transplant centers. Several issues such as the usage of rituximab and standardization of blood group antibody titration remain to be settled. The deposition of C4d is no longer the histopathologic hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection, which have inspired innovative strategies of peripheral molecular screening and the improvement of histological diagnosis of AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). The better understanding of the underlying mechanism might facilitate the distinction and therapeutic schemes of AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menger Cen
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rending Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Kong
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hao Deng
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenhua Lei
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salvadori M, Tsalouchos A. Current protocols and outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2020; 10:191-205. [PMID: 32844095 PMCID: PMC7416363 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i7.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the principal obstacles in transplantation from living donors is that approximately 30% are immunologically incompatible because of the presence in the recipient of antibodies directed against the human leukocyte antigen system of the donor or because of the incompatibility of the ABO system. The aim of this review is to describe the more recent data from the literature on the different protocols used and the clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. Two different strategies are used to overcome these barriers: desensitization of the recipient to remove the antibodies and to prevent their rebound after transplantation and the exchange of organs between two or more pairs. The largest part of this review is dedicated to describing the techniques of desensitization. Even if the first reports of successful renal transplantation between ABO-incompatible pairs have been published by 1980, the number of ABO-incompatible transplants increased substantially in this century because of our improved knowledge of the immune system and the availability of new drugs. Rituximab has substantially replaced splenectomy. The technique of apheresis has improved and more recently a tailored desensitization proved to be the more efficient strategy avoiding an excess of immunosuppression with the related side effects. Recent reports document outcomes for such transplantation similar to the outcomes of standard transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Salvadori
- Department of Transplantation Renal Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Aris Tsalouchos
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Saints Cosmas and Damian Hospital, Pescia 51017, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Sandwijk MS, Klooster A, ten Berge IJM, Diepstra A, Florquin S, Hoelbeek JJ, Bemelman FJ, Sanders JS. Complement activation and long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. World J Nephrol 2019; 8:95-108. [PMID: 31662955 PMCID: PMC6817790 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v8.i6.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible kidney transplantation are equivalent in terms of short-term graft and patient survival. This is thought to be the result of ABO-incompatible graft accommodation, which occurs when anti-blood group antibodies re-occur after transplantation but somehow do not yield their detrimental effect. The underlying mechanism is unclear, but one of the hypotheses is that this is the result of complement inhibition. Since virtually all ABO-incompatible graft biopsies are C4d positive, this complement inhibition must occur somewhere in the complement cascade after the formation of C4d has already taken place, but where exactly is unclear. It is also unclear whether complement inhibition is complete. Incomplete accommodation could explain why recent studies have shown that long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible transplantation is somewhat inferior to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation.
AIM To unravel the relationship between pre-transplant anti-ABO antibodies, complement activation, and long-term graft function.
METHODS We included all 27 ABO-incompatible transplantations that were performed between 2008 and 2013 at the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam and the University Medical Center Groningen. For each ABO-incompatible transplantation, we included four ABO-compatible controls matched by age, sex, and transplantation date.
RESULTS Graft and patient survival were not significantly different. The slope of kidney function during five-year follow-up was also not significantly different, but ABO-incompatible recipients did have a lower kidney function at three months (creatinine clearance 58 vs 69 mL/min, P = 0.02, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 46 vs 52 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.08), due to a high rate of early rejection (33% vs 15%, P = 0.03), mostly T-cell mediated. Pre-transplant anti-ABO IgG titers were positively correlated with C5b-9 staining, which itself was positively correlated with the occurrence of T-cell mediated rejection. This may be the result of concurrent C5a formation, which could function as a costimulatory signal for T-cell activation.
CONCLUSION Co-stimulation of T-cell activation by ongoing complement activation by anti-ABO antibodies may be responsible for an impaired long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit S van Sandwijk
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
- Dianet Dialysis Center, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Astrid Klooster
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Pathology Friesland, Leeuwarden NL-8917 EN, Netherlands
| | - Ineke JM ten Berge
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
| | - Sandrine Florquin
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Joris J Hoelbeek
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Increasing evidence indicates an integral role for the complement system in the deleterious inflammatory reactions that occur during critical phases of the transplantation process, such as brain or cardiac death of the donor, surgical trauma, organ preservation and ischaemia-reperfusion injury, as well as in humoral and cellular immune responses to the allograft. Ischaemia is the most common cause of complement activation in kidney transplantation and in combination with reperfusion is a major cause of inflammation and graft damage. Complement also has a prominent role in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) owing to ABO and HLA incompatibility, which leads to devastating damage to the transplanted kidney. Emerging drugs and treatment modalities that inhibit complement activation at various stages in the complement cascade are being developed to ameliorate the damage caused by complement activation in transplantation. These promising new therapies have various potential applications at different stages in the process of transplantation, including inhibiting the destructive effects of ischaemia and/or reperfusion injury, treating ABMR, inducing accommodation and modulating the adaptive immune response.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lian Y, Gao C, Wu Y, Xia J, Leng Y, Liu Y, Zhu M, Chen J, Qi Z. Suppression of Delayed Xenograft Rejection by Resveratrol in a Hamster-to-Rat Cardiac Transplantation Model. Transplant Proc 2017; 49:1483-1491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.03.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Revised: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
8
|
Abdulrahman Z, Bennani Naciri H, Allal A, Sallusto F, Debiol B, Esposito L, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Kamar N, Rostaing L. Long-term outcomes after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation; a single-center French study. J Nephropathol 2017. [DOI: 10.15171/jnp.2017.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
9
|
Biglarnia AR, Ekdahl KN, Nilsson B. Complement Interception Across Humoral Incompatibility in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Clinical Perspective. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2015; 865:211-33. [PMID: 26306452 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18603-0_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The humoral barrier in transplant biology is the result of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), directed either against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) or non-HLA antigens such as blood group (ABO) molecules. The term "sensitization" applies to patients carrying these antibodies. Transplantation is widely accepted as a life-saving opportunity for patients with terminal end-organ disease. However, in sensitized patients, transplant outcome is hampered by antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as a consequence of DSA exposure. Furthermore, sensitized patients have limited access to "matched" organs from the both living and deceased donor pool.Considering the crucial role of the complement system in the pathophysiology of AMR and the availability of complement intervention therapeutics, there is a growing interest in complement-targeting strategies. This review highlights the emerging importance of monitoring and modulation of the complement system in the context of enabling transplantation across humoral incompatibility in sensitized recipients with preformed anti-HLA or natural anti-ABO antibodies. It also discusses the significance of the complement system in the induction of accommodation and further emphasizes current and future perspectives of novel complement therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali-Reza Biglarnia
- Surgical Science, Department of Transplantation, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zschiedrich S, Kramer-Zucker A, Jänigen B, Seidl M, Emmerich F, Pisarski P, Huber TB. An update on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 2014; 28:387-97. [PMID: 25387763 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Revised: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is nowadays a well-established procedure to expand living donor transplantation to blood group incompatible donor/recipient constellations. In the last two decades, transplantation protocols evolved to more specific isohaemagglutinin elimination techniques and established competent antirejection protection protocols without the need of splenectomy. ABOi kidney transplantation associated accommodation despite isohaemagglutinin reappearance, C4d positivity of peritubular capillaries as well as the increased incidence of bleeding complications is currently under intense investigation. However, most recent data show excellent graft survival rates equivalent to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation outcome.
Collapse
|
11
|
Comparative study on signal transduction in endothelial cells after anti-a/b and human leukocyte antigen antibody reaction: implication of accommodation. Transplantation 2012; 93:390-7. [PMID: 22222784 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182424df3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent development of immunosuppressive therapy has provided a platform for clinical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. However, the prognosis seems to be different between the two. Accommodation, the condition of no injury even in the presence of antidonor antibody, is one of the key factors for successful transplantation with antidonor antibody. The purpose of this study was to compare signal transduction between anti-A/B and anti-HLA antibody reaction and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying accommodation. METHODS Blood type A- or B-transferase gene was transfected into human EA.hy926 endothelial cells. After cell sorting, A- or B-expressing cells at high levels were obtained. The effects of anti-HLA and anti-A/B antibody binding on complement-mediated cytotoxicity and signal transduction were examined. RESULTS Preincubation with anti-HLA antibodies only at low levels (<10% of saturation level) or anti-A/B antibodies at high levels (even at near saturation levels) for 24 hr resulted in resistance to complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Anti-A/B antibody ligation inactivated ERK1/2 pathway and increased complement regulatory proteins such as CD55 and CD59, whereas anti-HLA ligation activated PI3K/AKT pathway and increased cytoprotective genes such as hemeoxygenase-1 and ferritin H. CONCLUSION Complement inhibition by upregulation of CD55 and CD59 through ERK1/2 inactivation might play a substantial role in accommodation after ABO-incompatible transplantation, which could also explain the intriguing finding of C4d deposition in the graft without rejection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Subramanian V, Ramachandran S, Klein C, Wellen JR, Shenoy S, Chapman WC, Mohanakumar T. ABO-incompatible organ transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2012; 39:282-90. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.2012.01101.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: current practice and the decade ahead. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010; 15:526-30. [PMID: 20613520 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32833bfbba] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With rapidly growing deceased donor kidney transplant waiting lists, solutions to the shortage of kidney donors need to come from many corners. This review focuses on the current results and upcoming medications that will allow broad expansion of ABO-incompatible transplantation as one facet to combat this issue. RECENT FINDINGS Outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation are comparable to standard living donor transplantation but carry a significant, early risk of antibody-mediated rejection. Reducing this early rejection risk will be critical for a broader adaption of incompatible transplants. Improvements in the measurement of isohemagglutinin antibodies with less variability, will reduce patient risk. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has replaced splenectomy at most centers with equivalent outcomes, eliminating the need for additional surgical intervention. Studies of complement inhibitors have proven effective in treating antibody-mediated rejection in animal models and human studies are currently ongoing. Studies in xenotransplantation show that blood group carbohydrate antigens can be effectively removed ex vivo prior to implantation. Ongoing studies of accommodation in animal models are finding protective changes in endothelial cells and the immune system that could become targets for pharmacologic manipulation. SUMMARY Improvements that reduce risk of early rejection and its long-term sequelae will allow ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation to be adopted broadly along with paired kidney exchange programs, to address the donor organ shortage.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Accommodation, an acquired resistance of an organ to immune-mediated damage, has been recognized as an outcome of renal transplantation for more than 20 years. Accommodation was originally identified in blood group-incompatible kidney transplants that survived and functioned normally in recipients with high titers of antiblood group antibodies directed against antigens in the grafts. The most compelling questions today include how often and by which mechanisms accommodation occurs, and what might be the biological implications of accommodation. This communication summarizes recent advances in addressing these questions. RECENT FINDINGS Because its diagnosis has depended on identification of antidonor antibodies in serum, the prevalence of accommodation has been considered low. Recent research in animal models and clinical subjects may challenge that view. This research also suggests that sublethal graft injury of various types induces accommodation and that accommodation may be a dynamic condition, eventuating into tolerance on the one hand and chronic graft injury on the other. SUMMARY Burgeoning lines of investigation into accommodation now portray a condition of greater prevalence than once thought, exposing pathways that may contribute to the understanding of a range of responses to transplantation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Current world literature. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010; 15:254-61. [PMID: 20351662 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e328337a8db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Schneider MKJ, Seebach JD. Xenotransplantation literature update: May-October, 2009. Xenotransplantation 2010; 16:555-62. [PMID: 20042055 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00561.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
17
|
Abstract
In recent years the development of novel immunosuppressive strategies and new lines of engineered pigs have enabled improved xenograft survival in the clinically-relevant pig-to-primate models (especially in islet xenotransplantation). Furthermore, researchers have now developed appropriate biomolecular tools to address rapidly the remaining barriers and render organs from source pigs more "compatible" with man. Efficacy has been the main focus of the research conducted in the last few years. However, other fundamental issues, such as those regarding the physiology, the safety, the ethics and regulatory aspects of xenotransplantation, will need to be addressed satisfactorily prior to proceeding with clinical xenotransplantation trials.
Collapse
|