1
|
Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Senejohnny DM, Kamburova EG, Wisse BW, Reteig L, Gruijters ML, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Melchers RCA, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Bemelman FJ, Senev A, Naesens M, Heidt S, Otten HG. Determination of the clinical relevance of donor epitope-specific HLA-antibodies in kidney transplantation. HLA 2024; 103:e15346. [PMID: 38239046 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, survival rates are still partly impaired due to the deleterious effects of donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, not all luminex-defined DSA appear to be clinically relevant. Further analysis of DSA recognizing polymorphic amino acid configurations, called eplets or functional epitopes, might improve the discrimination between clinically relevant vs. irrelevant HLA antibodies. To evaluate which donor epitope-specific HLA antibodies (DESAs) are clinically important in kidney graft survival, relevant and irrelevant DESAs were discerned in a Dutch cohort of 4690 patients using Kaplan-Meier analysis and tested in a cox proportional hazard (CPH) model including nonimmunological variables. Pre-transplant DESAs were detected in 439 patients (9.4%). The presence of certain clinically relevant DESAs was significantly associated with increased risk on graft loss in deceased donor transplantations (p < 0.0001). The antibodies recognized six epitopes of HLA Class I, 3 of HLA-DR, and 1 of HLA-DQ, and most antibodies were directed to HLA-B (47%). Fifty-three patients (69.7%) had DESA against one donor epitope (range 1-5). Long-term graft survival rate in patients with clinically relevant DESA was 32%, rendering DESA a superior parameter to classical DSA (60%). In the CPH model, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of clinically relevant DESAs was 2.45 (1.84-3.25) in deceased donation, and 2.22 (1.25-3.95) in living donation. In conclusion, the developed model shows the deleterious effect of clinically relevant DESAs on graft outcome which outperformed traditional DSA-based risk analysis on antigen level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elena G Kamburova
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Reteig
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje L Gruijters
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rowena C A Melchers
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Houtman BM, Walraven I, de Grouw E, van der Maazen RWM, Kremer LCM, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Tissing WJE, Bresters D, van der Pal HJH, de Vries ACH, Louwerens M, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Neggers SJC, Janssens GO, Blijlevens NMA, Lambeck AJA, Preijers F, Loonen JJ. The Value of IgM Memory B-Cells in the Assessment of Splenic Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors at Risk for Splenic Dysfunction: A DCCSS-LATER Study. J Immunol Res 2023; 2023:5863995. [PMID: 37901347 PMCID: PMC10611543 DOI: 10.1155/2023/5863995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) who received radiotherapy involving the spleen or total body irradiation (TBI) might be at risk for splenic dysfunction. A comprehensive screening test for examining splenic dysfunction is lacking. Objective We investigated whether IgM memory B-cells could be used to assess splenic dysfunction in CCS who received a splenectomy, radiotherapy involving the spleen, or TBI. Methods All CCS were enrolled from the DCCSS-LATER cohort. We analyzed differences in IgM memory B-cells and Howell-Jolly bodies (HJB) in CCS who had a splenectomy (n = 9), received radiotherapy involving the spleen (n = 36), or TBI (n = 15). IgM memory B-cells < 9 cells/µL was defined as abnormal. Results We observed a higher median number of IgM memory B-cells in CCS who received radiotherapy involving the spleen (31 cells/µL, p=0.06) or TBI (55 cells/µL, p = 0.03) compared to CCS who received splenectomy (20 cells/µL). However, only two CCS had IgM memory B-cells below the lower limit of normal. No difference in IgM memory B-cells was observed between CCS with HJB present and absent (35 cells/µL vs. 44 cells/µL). Conclusion Although the number of IgM memory B-cells differed between splenectomized CCS and CCS who received radiotherapy involving the spleen or TBI, only two CCS showed abnormal values. Therefore, this assessment cannot be used to screen for splenic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente M. Houtman
- Department of Hematology, Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Elke de Grouw
- Department of Laboratory Medicine—Radboudumc Laboratory of Diagnostics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Leontien C. M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wim J. E. Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Andrica C. H. de Vries
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastian J. C. Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Medicine, Section Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geert O. Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Annechien J. A. Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Frank Preijers
- Department of Laboratory Medicine—Laboratory for Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J. Loonen
- Department of Hematology, Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elsink K, Huibers MMH, Hollink IHIM, Simons A, Zonneveld-Huijssoon E, van der Veken LT, Leavis HL, Henriet SSV, van Deuren M, van de Veerdonk FL, Potjewijd J, Berghuis D, Dalm VASH, Vermont CL, van de Ven AAJM, Lambeck AJA, Abbott KM, van Hagen PM, de Bree GJ, Kuijpers TW, Frederix GWJ, van Gijn ME, van Montfrans JM. Implementation of Early Next-Generation Sequencing for Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Implications in Dutch Genome Diagnostic Centers. Front Immunol 2022; 12:780134. [PMID: 34992599 PMCID: PMC8724043 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.780134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, affecting different components of the immune system. Over 450 IEI related genes have been identified, with new genes continually being recognized. This makes the early application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a diagnostic method in the evaluation of IEI a promising development. We aimed to provide an overview of the diagnostic yield and time to diagnosis in a cohort of patients suspected of IEI and evaluated by an NGS based IEI panel early in the diagnostic trajectory in a multicenter setting in the Netherlands. Study Design We performed a prospective observational cohort study. We collected data of 165 patients with a clinical suspicion of IEI without prior NGS based panel evaluation that were referred for early NGS using a uniform IEI gene panel. The diagnostic yield was assessed in terms of definitive genetic diagnoses, inconclusive diagnoses and patients without abnormalities in the IEI gene panel. We also assessed time to diagnosis and clinical implications. Results For children, the median time from first consultation to diagnosis was 119 days versus 124 days for adult patients (U=2323; p=0.644). The median turn-around time (TAT) of genetic testing was 56 days in pediatric patients and 60 days in adult patients (U=1892; p=0.191). A definitive molecular diagnosis was made in 25/65 (24.6%) of pediatric patients and 9/100 (9%) of adults. Most diagnosed disorders were identified in the categories of immune dysregulation (n=10/25; 40%), antibody deficiencies (n=5/25; 20%), and phagocyte diseases (n=5/25; 20%). Inconclusive outcomes were found in 76/165 (46.1%) patients. Within the patient group with a genetic diagnosis, a change in disease management occurred in 76% of patients. Conclusion In this cohort, the highest yields of NGS based evaluation for IEI early in the diagnostic trajectory were found in pediatric patients, and in the disease categories immune dysregulation and phagocyte diseases. In cases where a definitive diagnosis was made, this led to important disease management implications in a large majority of patients. More research is needed to establish a uniform diagnostic pathway for cases with inconclusive diagnoses, including variants of unknown significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Elsink
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Manon M H Huibers
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Iris H I M Hollink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annet Simons
- Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Zonneveld-Huijssoon
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Lars T van der Veken
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Helen L Leavis
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stefanie S V Henriet
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Amalia's Children Hospital, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Deuren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Frank L van de Veerdonk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Judith Potjewijd
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Berghuis
- Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Virgil A S H Dalm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology; Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Clementien L Vermont
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Rheumatology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annick A J M van de Ven
- Department of Internal Medicine and Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Kristin M Abbott
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - P Martin van Hagen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology; Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Godelieve J de Bree
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Taco W Kuijpers
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle E van Gijn
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Joris M van Montfrans
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hutten EM, Lambeck AJA, Dijkstra H, Nuver J, Oude Elberink HNG, Van de Ven AAJM. Successful rapid desensitization in a glioma patient with procarbazine-mediated anaphylaxis. Allergy 2021; 76:1932-1933. [PMID: 34128560 DOI: 10.1111/all.14698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M. Hutten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Allergology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J. A. Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Hilda Dijkstra
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Janine Nuver
- Department of Medical Oncology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke N. G. Oude Elberink
- Department of Internal Medicine and Allergology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Annick A. J. M. Van de Ven
- Department of Internal Medicine and Allergology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kamburova EG, Gruijters ML, Kardol‐Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Melchers RCA, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, ten Berge IJM, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Bemelman FJ, Otten HG. Antibodies against ARHGDIB are associated with long-term kidney graft loss. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:3335-3344. [PMID: 31194283 PMCID: PMC6899679 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of non-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival is a matter of debate, due to differences in reported results and lack of large-scale studies incorporating analysis of multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously. We developed a multiplex non-HLA antibody assay against 14 proteins highly expressed in the kidney. In this study, the presence of pretransplant non-HLA antibodies was correlated to renal allograft survival in a nationwide cohort of 4770 recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2006. Autoantibodies against Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 (ARHGDIB) were significantly associated with graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased-donor kidney (N = 3276) but not in recipients of a living-donor kidney (N = 1496). At 10 years after deceased-donor transplantation, recipients with anti-ARHGDIB antibodies (94/3276 = 2.9%) had a 13% lower death-censored covariate-adjusted graft survival compared to the anti-ARHGDIB-negative (3182/3276 = 97.1%) population (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.53; P = .0003). These antibodies occur independently from donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) or other non-HLA antibodies investigated. No significant relations with graft loss were found for the other 13 non-HLA antibodies. We suggest that pretransplant risk assessment can be improved by measuring anti-ARHGDIB antibodies in all patients awaiting deceased-donor transplantation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Heidt S, Haasnoot GW, Witvliet MD, van der Linden‐van Oevelen MJH, Kamburova EG, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Seelen MAJ, Sanders J, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MA, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Otten HG, Roelen DL, Claas FHJ. Allocation to highly sensitized patients based on acceptable mismatches results in low rejection rates comparable to nonsensitized patients. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2926-2933. [PMID: 31155833 PMCID: PMC6790659 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Whereas regular allocation avoids unacceptable mismatches on the donor organ, allocation to highly sensitized patients within the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program is based on the patient's HLA phenotype plus acceptable antigens. These are HLA antigens to which the patient never made antibodies, as determined by extensive laboratory testing. AM patients have superior long-term graft survival compared with highly sensitized patients in regular allocation. Here, we questioned whether the AM program also results in lower rejection rates. From the PROCARE cohort, consisting of all Dutch kidney transplants in 1995-2005, we selected deceased donor single transplants with a minimum of 1 HLA mismatch and determined the cumulative 6-month rejection incidence for patients in AM or regular allocation. Additionally, we determined the effect of minimal matching criteria of 1 HLA-B plus 1 HLA-DR, or 2 HLA-DR antigens on rejection incidence. AM patients showed significantly lower rejection rates than highly immunized patients in regular allocation, comparable to nonsensitized patients, independent of other risk factors for rejection. In contrast to highly sensitized patients in regular allocation, minimal matching criteria did not affect rejection rates in AM patients. Allocation based on acceptable antigens leads to relatively low-risk transplants for highly sensitized patients with rejection rates similar to those of nonimmunized individuals.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamburova EG, Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Meeldijk J, Bovenschen N, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Non-HLA Antibody Assay for the Screening of Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2018; 9:3002. [PMID: 30631326 PMCID: PMC6315148 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease is kidney transplantation. Although graft survival rates have improved in the last decades, patients still may lose their grafts partly due to the detrimental effects of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and to a lesser extent also by antibodies directed against non-HLA antigens expressed on the donor endothelium. Assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies are already in use for many years and have been proven useful for transplant risk stratification. Currently, there is a need for assays to additionally detect multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously in order to study their clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation. This study describes the development, technical details and validation of a high-throughput multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies against 14 non-HLA antigens coupled directly to MagPlex microspheres or indirectly via a HaloTag. The non-HLA antigens have been selected based on a literature search in patients with kidney disease or following transplantation. Due to the flexibility of the assay, this approach can be used to include alternative antigens and can also be used for screening of other organ transplant recipients, such as heart and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jan Meeldijk
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Niels Bovenschen
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kamburova EG, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, Hoitsma AJ, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG. Pretransplant C3d-Fixing Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Are Not Associated with Increased Risk for Kidney Graft Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:2279-2285. [PMID: 30049681 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018020205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Complement-fixing antibodies against donor HLA are considered a contraindication for kidney transplant. A modification of the IgG single-antigen bead (SAB) assay allows detection of anti-HLA antibodies that bind C3d. Because early humoral graft rejection is considered to be complement mediated, this SAB-based technique may provide a valuable tool in the pretransplant risk stratification of kidney transplant recipients.Methods Previously, we established that pretransplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are associated with increased risk for long-term graft failure in complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch-negative transplants. In this study, we further characterized the DSA-positive serum samples using the C3d SAB assay.Results Among 567 pretransplant DSA-positive serum samples, 97 (17%) contained at least one C3d-fixing DSA, whereas 470 (83%) had non-C3d-fixing DSA. At 10 years after transplant, patients with C3d-fixing antibodies had a death-censored, covariate-adjusted graft survival of 60%, whereas patients with non-C3d-fixing DSA had a graft survival of 64% (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.48 for C3d-fixing DSA compared with non-C3d-fixing DSA; P=0.93). Patients without DSA had a 10-year graft survival of 78%.Conclusions The C3d-fixing ability of pretransplant DSA is not associated with increased risk for graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Departments of
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Departments of
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory and
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry, Dutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands; Departments of
| | | | | | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Internal Medicine and.,Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and Departments of
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and Departments of
| | - Frans H Claas
- Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and Departments of
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wentink MWJ, Lambeck AJA, van Zelm MC, Simons E, van Dongen JJM, IJspeert H, Schölvinck EH, van der Burg M. CD21 and CD19 deficiency: Two defects in the same complex leading to different disease modalities. Clin Immunol 2015; 161:120-7. [PMID: 26325596 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Deficiencies in CD19 and CD81 (forming the CD19-complex with CD21 and CD225) cause a severe clinical phenotype. One CD21 deficient patient has been described. We present a second CD21 deficient patient, with a mild clinical phenotype and compared the immunobiological characteristics of CD21 and CD19 deficiency. METHODS CD21 deficiency was characterized by flowcytometric immunophenotyping and sequencing. Real-time PCR, in vitro stimulation and next generation sequencing were used to characterize B-cell responses and affinity maturation in CD21(-/-) and CD19(-/-) B cells. RESULTS A compound heterozygous mutation in CD21 caused CD21 deficiency. CD21(-/-) B cells responded normally to in vitro stimulation and AID was transcribed. Affinity maturation was less affected by CD21 than by CD19 deficiency. CONCLUSIONS Both CD21 and CD19 deficiencies cause hypogammaglobulinemia and reduced memory B cells. CD19 deficiency causes a more severe clinical phenotype. B-cell characteristics reflect this, both after in vitro stimulation as in affinity maturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein W J Wentink
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Dept. of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Menno C van Zelm
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Simons
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques J M van Dongen
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanna IJspeert
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth H Schölvinck
- Dept. of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1,9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam van der Burg
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mandal S, Eksteen-Akeroyd ZH, Jacobs MJ, Hammink R, Koepf M, Lambeck AJA, van Hest JCM, Wilson CJ, Blank K, Figdor CG, Rowan AE. Therapeutic nanoworms: towards novel synthetic dendritic cells for immunotherapy. Chem Sci 2013. [DOI: 10.1039/c3sc51399h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
11
|
Tel J, Lambeck AJA, Cruz LJ, Tacken PJ, de Vries IJM, Figdor CG. Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells phagocytose, process, and present exogenous particulate antigen. J Immunol 2010; 184:4276-83. [PMID: 20304825 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) play a major role in shaping both innate and adaptive immune responses, mainly via their production of large amounts of type I IFNs. pDCs are considered to primarily present endogenous Ags and are thought not to participate in the uptake and presentation of Ags from the extracellular environment, in contrast to their myeloid counterparts, which efficiently endocytose extracellular particulates. In this study, we show that human pDCs are able to phagocytose and process particulate forms of Ag entrapped in poly(lactic-coglycolic acid) microparticles. Furthermore, pDCs were also able to sense TLR ligands (TLR-Ls) incorporated in these particles, resulting in rapid pDC activation and high IFN-alpha secretion. Combining a tetanus toxoid peptide and TLR-Ls (CpG C and R848) in these microparticles resulted in efficient pDC activation and concomitant Ag-specific T cell stimulation. Moreover, particulate Ag was phagocytosed and presented more efficiently than soluble Ag, indicating that microparticles can be exploited to facilitate efficient delivery of antigenic cargo and immunostimulatory molecules to pDCs. Together, our results show that in addition to their potency to stimulate innate immunity, pDCs can polarize adaptive immune responses against exogenous particulate Ag. These results may have important consequences for the development of new immunotherapeutic strategies exploiting Ag and TLR-Ls encapsulated in microparticles to target APC subsets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurjen Tel
- Department of Tumor Immunology, , Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leffers N, Lambeck AJA, Gooden MJM, Hoogeboom BN, Wolf R, Hamming IE, Hepkema BG, Willemse PHB, Molmans BHW, Hollema H, Drijfhout JW, Sluiter WJ, Valentijn ARPM, Fathers LM, Oostendorp J, van der Zee AGJ, Melief CJ, van der Burg SH, Daemen T, Nijman HW. Immunization with a P53 synthetic long peptide vaccine induces P53-specific immune responses in ovarian cancer patients, a phase II trial. Int J Cancer 2009; 125:2104-13. [PMID: 19621448 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis of ovarian cancer, the primary cause of death from gynecological malignancies, has only modestly improved over the last decades. Immunotherapy is one of the new treatment modalities explored for this disease. To investigate safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and obtain an impression of clinical activity of a p53 synthetic long peptide (p53-SLP) vaccine, twenty patients with recurrent elevation of CA-125 were included, eighteen of whom were immunized 4 times with 10 overlapping p53-SLP in Montanide ISA51. The first 5 patients were extensively monitored for toxicity, but showed no > or = grade 3 toxicity, thus accrual was continued. Overall, toxicity was limited to grade 1 and 2, mostly locoregional, inflammatory reactions. IFN-gamma producing p53-specific T-cell responses were induced in all patients who received all 4 immunizations as measured by IFN-gamma ELISPOT. An IFN-gamma secretion assay showed that vaccine-induced p53-specific T-cells were CD4(+), produced both Th1 and Th2 cytokines as analyzed by cytokine bead array. Notably, Th2 cytokines dominated the p53-specific response. P53-specific T-cells were present in a biopsy of the last immunization site of at least 9/17 (53%) patients, reflecting the migratory capacity of p53-specific T-cells. As best clinical response, stable disease evaluated by CA-125 levels and CT-scans, was observed in 2/20 (10%) patients, but no relationship was found with vaccine-induced immunity. This study shows that the p53-SLP vaccine is safe, well tolerated and induces p53-specific T-cell responses in ovarian cancer patients. Upcoming trials will focus on improving T helper-1 polarization and clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ninke Leffers
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Mare A, Lambeck AJA, Regts J, van Dam GM, Nijman HW, Snippe H, Wilschut J, Daemen T. Viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens: a possible involvement of T-cell competition. Gene Ther 2007; 15:393-403. [PMID: 18004406 DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3303060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination with recombinant viral vectors may be impeded by preexisting vector-specific immunity or by vector-specific immunity induced during the priming immunization. It is assumed that virus-neutralizing antibodies represent the principal effector mechanism of vector-specific immunity, while killing of infected cells by vector-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) has also been suggested. Using recombinant Semliki Forest virus (rSFV) expressing E6E7 antigen from human papillomavirus, we demonstrate that secondary immune responses against E6E7 are neither affected by vector-specific antibodies nor by CTL-mediated killing of infected cells. Instead, the presence of the antigen during the prime immunization appeared to be the main determinant for the boosting efficacy. After priming with rSFVeE6,7, a homologous booster stimulated the primed E6E7-specific CTL response and induced long-lasting memory. Passively transferred SFV-neutralizing antibodies did not inhibit E6E7-specific CTL responses, although transgene expression was strongly reduced under these conditions. Conversely, in mice primed with irrelevant rSFV, induction of E6E7-specific CTLs was inhibited presumably due to vector-specific responses induced by the priming immunization. When during the priming with irrelevant rSFV, E7-protein was co-administered, the inhibitory effect of vector-specific immunity was abolished. These results suggest that, apart from vector-specific antibodies or killing of infected cells, T-cell competition may be involved in determining the efficacy of viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A de Mare
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Molecular Virology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lambeck AJA, Crijns APG, Leffers N, Sluiter WJ, ten Hoor KA, Braid M, van der Zee AGJ, Daemen T, Nijman HW, Kast WM. Serum Cytokine Profiling as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool in Ovarian Cancer: A Potential Role for Interleukin 7. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:2385-91. [PMID: 17438097 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if serum cytokine levels could be used as diagnostic or prognostic markers in ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A cytokine bead array was done to simultaneously analyze 14 cytokines in the sera of 187 ovarian cancer patients with complete clinicopathologic data and follow-up, 45 patients with benign ovarian tumors, and 50 healthy controls. Serum levels of the well-known serum tumor marker CA-125 were routinely measured in all patients. RESULTS Serum levels of CA-125, interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-7, and IL-10 were elevated in ovarian cancer patients compared with patients with benign ovarian tumors. Analyzing the cytokines in combination with CA-125 showed that a combination of IL-7 and CA-125 serum levels could accurately predict 69% of the ovarian cancer patients, without falsely classifying patients with benign pelvic mass. The cytokines IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and IP-10 and CA-125 were associated with disease-free and overall survival in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, IL-7 and IP-10 were independent predictors of overall survival, although after inclusion of the clinicopathologic parameters, only stage and residual disease remained as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS IL-7 levels were found to be strongly associated with ovarian cancer and could be used in combination with CA-125 to distinguish between malignant and benign ovarian tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|