1
|
Xu Q, Elrefaei M, Taupin JL, Hitchman KMK, Hiho S, Gareau AJ, Iasella CJ, Marrari M, Belousova N, Bettinotti M, Narula T, Alvarez F, Sanchez PG, Levvey B, Westall G, Snell G, Levine DJ, Zeevi A, Roux A. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an increased number of non-HLA antibodies. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:663-672. [PMID: 38141896 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Multiple factors, such as infection, alloimmunity, and autoimmunity, may lead to CLAD. Here, we aim to examine the role of non-human leukocytes antigen (HLA) antibodies in CLAD in a large retrospective cohort. METHODS We analyzed non-HLA antibodies in the pre- and post-transplant sera of 226 (100 CLAD, 126 stable) lung transplant recipients from 5 centers, and we used a separate cohort to confirm our findings. RESULTS A panel of 18 non-HLA antibodies was selected for analysis based on their significantly higher positive rates in CLAD vs stable groups. The panel-18 non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) may be positive pre- or post-transplant; the risk for CLAD is higher in the latter. The presence of both non-HLA antibody and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) was associated with an augmented risk of CLAD (HR=25.09 [5.52-14.04], p < 0.001), which was higher than that for single-positive patients. In the independent confirmatory cohort of 61 (20 CLAD, 41 stable) lung transplant recipients, the risk for CLAD remained elevated in double-positive patients (HR=10.67 [0.98-115.68], p = 0.052). After adjusting for nonstandard immunosuppression, patients with double-positive DSA/Non-HLA antibodies had an elevated risk for graft loss (HR=2.53 [1.29-4.96], p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Circulating non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) were independently associated with a higher risk for CLAD. Furthermore, when non-HLA antibodies and DSA were detected concomitantly, the risk for CLAD and graft loss was significantly increased. These results show that humoral immunity to HLA and non-HLA antigens may contribute to CLAD development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Mohamed Elrefaei
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Kelley M K Hitchman
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Steven Hiho
- Australian Red Cross Life Blood, Victorian and Immunogenetics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison J Gareau
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carlo J Iasella
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marilyn Marrari
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Maria Bettinotti
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tathagat Narula
- Division of Lung Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Francisco Alvarez
- Division of Lung Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Pablo G Sanchez
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bronwyn Levvey
- Lung Transplant Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glen Westall
- Lung Transplant Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gregory Snell
- Lung Transplant Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah J Levine
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Antoine Roux
- Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Subburayalu J. Immune surveillance and humoral immune responses in kidney transplantation - A look back at T follicular helper cells. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1114842. [PMID: 37503334 PMCID: PMC10368994 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1114842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
T follicular helper cells comprise a specialized, heterogeneous subset of immune-competent T helper cells capable of influencing B cell responses in lymphoid tissues. In physiology, for example in response to microbial challenges or vaccination, this interaction chiefly results in the production of protecting antibodies and humoral memory. In the context of kidney transplantation, however, immune surveillance provided by T follicular helper cells can take a life of its own despite matching of human leukocyte antigens and employing the latest immunosuppressive regiments. This puts kidney transplant recipients at risk of subclinical and clinical rejection episodes with a potential risk for allograft loss. In this review, the current understanding of immune surveillance provided by T follicular helper cells is briefly described in physiological responses to contrast those pathological responses observed after kidney transplantation. Sensitization of T follicular helper cells with the subsequent emergence of detectable donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies, non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies their implication for kidney transplantation and lessons learnt from other transplantation "settings" with special attention to antibody-mediated rejection will be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Subburayalu
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pizzo H, Mirocha J, Choi J, Garrison J, Haas M, Zhang X, Kamil ES, Kim I, Jordan SC, Puliyanda DP. Pre-transplant angiotensin II receptor type I antibodies in pediatric renal transplant recipients: An observational cohort study. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14400. [PMID: 36168673 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) in pediatric renal transplantation is unclear. Here, we evaluated pre-transplant AT1R-Ab on transplant outcomes in the first 5 years. Secondary analysis compared pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels by age. METHODS Thirty-six patients, 2-20 years old, were divided into two groups: pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- (<17 U/ml; n = 18) and pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (≥17 U/ml; n = 18). eGFR was determined at 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 4-year post-transplant. Allograft biopsies were performed in the setting of strong HLA-DSA (MFI > 10 000), AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml, and/or elevated creatinine. RESULTS Mean age in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- was 13.3 years vs. 11.0 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (p = 0.16). At 6 months, mean eGFR was 111.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- vs. 100.2 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + at 1 year, 103.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 100.5; at 2 years, 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. and 93.7; at 4 years, 72.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 80.9. 11/36 patients had acute rejection (6 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab-, 5 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + ). There was no difference in rejection rates. All 6 subjects with de novo HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml at the time of biopsy experienced rejection. Mean age in those with the AT1R-Ab ≥40 U/ml was 10.0 years vs. 13.2 in those <40 U/ml (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION In our small cohort, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml was not associated with reduced graft function or rejection. The pathogenicity of pre-transplant AT1R-Ab in pediatric kidney transplantation requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Pizzo
- Pediatric Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James Mirocha
- Biostatistics Core, Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jua Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Garrison
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elaine S Kamil
- Pediatric Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dechu P Puliyanda
- Pediatric Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park S, Yang SH, Kim J, Cho S, Yang J, Min SI, Ha J, Jeong CW, Bhoo SH, Kim YC, Kim DK, Oh KH, Joo KW, Kim YS, Moon KC, Song EY, Lee H. Clinical Significances of Anti-Collagen Type I and Type III Antibodies in Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10099. [PMID: 35634584 PMCID: PMC9131656 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
It is important to determine the clinical significance of non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and their association with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney allografts. We collected post-transplant sera from 68 ABMR patients, 67 T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) patients, and 83 control subjects without rejection, and determined the titers of 39 non-HLA antibodies including antibodies for angiotensin II receptor type I and MICA. We compared all these non-HLA antibody titers among the study groups. Then, we investigated their association with the risk of death-censored graft failure in ABMR cases. Among the antibodies evaluated, anti-collagen type I (p = 0.001) and type III (p < 0.001) antibody titers were significantly higher in ABMR cases than in both TCMR cases and no-rejection controls. Both anti-collagen type I [per 1 standard deviation (SD), adjusted odds ratio (OR), 11.72 (2.73-76.30)] and type III [per 1 SD, adjusted OR, 6.22 (1.91-31.75)] antibodies were significantly associated with the presence of ABMR. Among ABMR cases, a higher level of anti-collagen type I [per 1 SD, adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.90 (1.32-2.75)] or type III per 1 SD, [adjusted HR, 1.57 (1.15-2.16)] antibody was associated with a higher risk of death-censored graft failure. In conclusion, post-transplant anti-collagen type I and type III antibodies may be novel non-HLA antibodies related to ABMR of kidney allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sehoon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam-si, South Korea,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Hee Yang
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jiyeon Kim
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Semin Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang-Il Min
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jongwon Ha
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Hee Bhoo
- Department of Genetic Engineering and Graduate School of Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, South Korea
| | - Yong Chul Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Ki Kim
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea,Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kook-Hwan Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwon Wook Joo
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea,Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yon Su Kim
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea,Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Chul Moon
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Young Song
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,*Correspondence: Eun Young Song, , orcid.org/0000-0003-1286-9611; Hajeong Lee, , orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-1587
| | - Hajeong Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea,Deparment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea,*Correspondence: Eun Young Song, , orcid.org/0000-0003-1286-9611; Hajeong Lee, , orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-1587
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan AP, Guerra MAR, Rossetti M, Hickey MJ, Venick RS, Marcus EA, McDiarmid SV, Farmer DG, Reed EF, Wozniak LJ. Non-HLA AT1R antibodies are highly prevalent after pediatric intestinal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13987. [PMID: 33590644 PMCID: PMC8058288 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The role of angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies in intestinal transplantation (ITx) is unclear. The aims were 1) to identify the prevalence of AT1R antibodies in pediatric ITx, compared to pediatric intestinal failure (IF), and 2) to determine whether AT1R antibodies were associated with graft dysfunction. 46 serum samples from 25 ITx patients (3 isolated ITx, 22 liver-inclusive ITx) were collected during routine visits >6 months apart and during episodes of graft dysfunction as a result of infectious enteritis or rejection. For comparison, samples were collected from 7 IF control patients. AT1R antibodies were considered positive for levels >17 U/mL. The median (range) AT1R antibody level for ITx patients was 40.0 U/mL (7.2-40.0), compared to 7.0 U/mL (5.7-40.0) for IF patients (p = .02). There was a trend toward higher prevalence of AT1R antibodies in ITx compared with IF patients (68% versus 29%, p = .09). Among ITx patients, the prevalence of AT1R antibodies was not different between periods of active graft dysfunction and normal health (83% versus 67%, p = .31). For 16 patients with >2 samples, AT1R antibodies remained positive in 67% cases, developed in 14% cases, disappeared in 10% cases, and remained negative in 10% cases. The changes in AT1R antibodies did not correlate with de/sensitizing events. This is the first study of AT1R antibodies in pediatric ITx. AT1R antibodies are highly prevalent after ITx and may be triggered by immune activation associated with the transplant. However, their pathogenicity and clinical utility remain in question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin P Chan
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marjorie-Anne R Guerra
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maura Rossetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle J Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert S Venick
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Marcus
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA,VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne V McDiarmid
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura J Wozniak
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang X, Reinsmoen NL. Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2020; 47:235-242. [PMID: 32426916 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars- Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nancy L Reinsmoen
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars- Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamburova EG, Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Meeldijk J, Bovenschen N, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Non-HLA Antibody Assay for the Screening of Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2018; 9:3002. [PMID: 30631326 PMCID: PMC6315148 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease is kidney transplantation. Although graft survival rates have improved in the last decades, patients still may lose their grafts partly due to the detrimental effects of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and to a lesser extent also by antibodies directed against non-HLA antigens expressed on the donor endothelium. Assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies are already in use for many years and have been proven useful for transplant risk stratification. Currently, there is a need for assays to additionally detect multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously in order to study their clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation. This study describes the development, technical details and validation of a high-throughput multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies against 14 non-HLA antigens coupled directly to MagPlex microspheres or indirectly via a HaloTag. The non-HLA antigens have been selected based on a literature search in patients with kidney disease or following transplantation. Due to the flexibility of the assay, this approach can be used to include alternative antigens and can also be used for screening of other organ transplant recipients, such as heart and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jan Meeldijk
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Niels Bovenschen
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Alloimmunity driving rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation can be grossly divided into mechanisms predominantly driven by either T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), though the co-existence of both types of rejections can be seen in a variable number of sampled grafts. Acute TCMR can generally be well controlled by the establishment of effective immunosuppression (1, 2). Acute ABMR is a low frequency finding in the current era of blood group and HLA donor/recipient matching and the avoidance of engraftment in the context of high-titer, preformed donor-specific antibodies. However, chronic ABMR remains a major complication resulting in the untimely loss of transplanted organs (3-10). The close relationship between donor-specific antibodies and ABMR has been revealed by the highly sensitive detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (7, 11-15). Injury to transplanted organs by activation of humoral immune reaction in the context of HLA identical transplants and the absence of donor specific antibodies (17-24), strongly suggest the participation of non-HLA (nHLA) antibodies in ABMR (25). In this review, we discuss the genesis of ABMR in the context of HLA and nHLA antibodies and summarize strategies for ABMR management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minnie M. Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hickey MJ, Valenzuela NM, Reed EF. Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen. Front Immunol 2016; 7:30. [PMID: 26870045 PMCID: PMC4740371 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA , USA
| | - Nicole M Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA , USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|