Relationship among C1q-fixing de novo donor specific antibodies, C4d deposition and renal outcome in transplant glomerulopathy

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

Clinical Outcome of Kidney Transplant Recipients with C1q-Binding De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies: A Single-Center Experience

Complement activation by HLA antibodies is a key component of immune-mediated graft injury. We examined the clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with complement-fixing de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) who were followed in our center. The C1q-binding ability was retrospectively assessed in 69 patients with dnDSA and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values > 2000 out of the 1325 kidney transplant recipients who were screened for DSA between 2015 and 2019. Luminex IgG single antigen beads (SAB)and C1q-SAB assays (One Lambda) were used. C1q-binding dnDSA was identified in 32/69 (46.4%) of the patients. Significantly higher MFI values were observed in C1q-positive DSA (18,978 versus 5840, p < 0.001). Renal graft biopsies were performed in 43 of the kidney transplant recipients (62.3%) with allograft dysfunction. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was detected in 29/43 (67.4%) of the patients. The incidence of ABMR was similar among patients with C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding DSA (51.7% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.523). Graft loss occurred in 30/69 (43.5%) of the patients at a median time of 82.5 months (IQR 45-135) from DSA detection. C1q-binding DSA was present in more patients who experienced graft loss (53.1% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.152). Higher MFI values and inferior clinical outcomes occurred in most of the kidney transplant recipients with C1q-binding dnDSA.

Association Between De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Clinical Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are recognized as an important factor of kidney allograft loss as a subsequent event of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The clinical relevance of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) after kidney transplant, particularly in their ability to bind C1q, has been widely investigated to various extents among studies. A recent study was performed to examine the association between C1q-binding dnDSAs and succeeding clinical events after kidney transplant.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of studies published before April 2021 was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases. Publications on dnDSA after kidney transplant focusing on differentiation between C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding were included. The outcomes analyzed were AMR rate and allograft loss. Studies using preformed DSA were excluded. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed using Mantzel-Haenzel method, and the I2 value was used to determine the heterogeneity of the studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 535 patients from 13 studies who developed dnDSA after kidney transplant were analyzed. Among these, 239 (44.7%) had C1q-binding and 296 (55.3%) had non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Acute AMR was found in 59.2% (97/164) of the C1q-binding group and in 28.8% (49/170) of the non-C1q-binding group (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 58%). Chronic AMR was found in 50% (19/38) of the C1q-binding group and in 16.9% (11/65) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71], P = .002, I2 = 0%). Allograft loss was found in 62.2% (74/119) of the C1q-binding group and in 34.1% (60/176) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who developed C1q-binding dnDSA display an increased risk of AMR and allograft loss compared with those with non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Therefore, C1q-binding dnDSAs are associated with inferior outcomes after kidney transplant.

Intensity of de novo DSA detected by Immucor Lifecodes assay and C3d fixing antibodies are not predictive of subclinical ABMR after Kidney Transplantation

De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss. We tested Immucor* (IM) Luminex Single-antigen beads (LSAB) assay and C3d-fixing antibodies in the setting of dnDSA and subclinical (s) ABMR. This retrospective multicentric study included 123 patients biopsied because of the presence of subclinical de novo DSA detected by One Lamda* Labscreen (MFI > 1000). In 112 patients, sera of the day of the biopsy were available and tested in a central lab with IM Lifecodes LSAB and C3d fixing antibodies assays. In 16 patients (14.3%), no DSA was detected using Immucor test. In 96 patients, at least one DSA was determined with IM. Systematic biopsies showed active sABMR in 30 patients (31.2%), chronic active sABMR in 17 patients (17.7%) and no lesions of sABMR in 49 KT recipients (51%). Intensitity criteria (BCM, BCR and AD-BCR) of DSA were not statistically different between these 3 histological groups. The proportion of patients with C3d-fixing DSA was not statistically different between the 3 groups and did not offer any prognostic value regarding graft survival. Performing biopsy for dnDSA could not be guided by the intensity criteria of IM LSAB assay. C3d-fixing DSA do not offer added value.

Investigating complement mediated interference in class I HLA-specific antibodies following renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Single antigen bead testing (SAB) for HLA-specific antibody enables efficient organ allocation and aids in the diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection. In this retrospective cohort study, a population of kidney transplant recipients possessing HLA Class I antibodies was used to evaluate the best method for resolving complement interference, the so called "prozone" effect. The aim was to compare the use of EDTA versus a Biotin-Streptavidin Complex as methodological approaches for abating the prozone effect using a fixed 1 in 10 dilution as validation.

METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients transplanted in our centre between 2009 and 2014 were identified as having class I HLA-specific antibody(-ies) using a Labscreen® Mixed assay. Positive sera underwent class I HLA-specific SAB testing; for comparison a standard SAB with and without EDTA, BSC and dilution (1 in 10) modifications were utilised. Samples were processed on the Luminex platform generating 11,349 bead reactions for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified sera from 23 patients giving rise to 170 bead reactions showing complement interference. Using linear modelling, we observed slightly higher MFIs on average in both EDTA and BSC modifications when compared to the standard assay, allowing the nominal threshold MFI of 2000 in the standard assay to be adjusted to 2097 and 2033 in the EDTA and BSC assays respectively. We calculated 99% prediction intervals to establish outlier bead reactions for each assay. The 1 in 10 dilution was used as a crosscheck for determining which prozone reactions were overcome by EDTA and BSC. Using ROC curve analysis, EDTA was found to be ~90% sensitive and 100% specific compared to BSC which was ~60% sensitive and 100% specific in ameliorating prozone positive reactions at the thresholds defined by linear models.

DISCUSSION

Our data indicates that both EDTA and BSC are suitable assays in overcoming CMI. We recommend that all clinical laboratories adopt a validated assay designed specifically to abrogate CMI for all potential renal transplant recipients, as the standard assay is inhibited in nearly 20% of a post-transplant cohort.

Donor-specific Antibody Surveillance and Graft Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) has been associated with rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation, and DSA screening is now recommended in all kidney transplant recipients. However, the clinical significance of dnDSA detected by screening patients with a stable creatinine remains unclear.

METHODS

One hundred three patients younger than 18years receiving a first, kidney alone transplant between December 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, underwent DSA screening every 3months for 2years posttransplant, with additional testing as clinically indicated. No treatment was given for DSAs in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection.

RESULTS

Twenty (19%) patients had dnDSA first detected on a screening test, and 13 (13%) patients had dnDSA first detected on a for-cause test. Mean follow-up time posttransplant was 4.4years. Screening-detected dnDSA was associated with an increased risk of rejection within 3years, microvascular inflammation, and C4d staining on a 2-year protocol biopsy. In a Cox proportional hazards regression, screening-detected dnDSA was not associated with time to 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-2.00; P=0.598) or graft loss. dnDSA first detected on for-cause testing was associated with a 2.8 times increased risk of decline in graft function (95% CI, 1.08-7.27; P=0.034) and a 7.34 times increased risk of graft loss (95% CI, 1.37-39.23 P=0.020) compared with those who did not develop dnDSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical setting in which dnDSA is first detected impacts the association between dnDSA and graft function. Further research is needed to clarify the role of dnDSA screening in pediatric kidney transplantation.

C1q-binding donor-specific antibody assays help define risk and prognosis in antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection represents the first cause of graft loss in renal transplant recipients, and it is imperative to identify appropriate tools to enable risk stratification of such patients. Lately, the usefulness of measuring complement-binding anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in renal transplantation has been intensely debated. While the jury is still out, recent data suggest that monitoring complement-binding DSAs may help to recognize high-risk patients and possibly trigger more effective interventions in selected patients.

Treatment with plasmapheresis, immunoglobulins and rituximab for chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: Clinical, immunological and pathological results

AIM

To evaluate the role of a therapeutic regimen with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab in chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) settings.

METHODS

We compared 21 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a diagnosis of cAMR in a retrospective case-control analysis: nine KTRs treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab (PE-IVIG-RTX group) vs 12 patients (control group) not treated with antibody-targeted therapies. We examined kidney survival and functional outcomes 24 mo after diagnosis. Histological features and donor-specific antibody (DSA) characteristics (MFI and C1q-fixing ability) were also investigated.

RESULTS

No difference in graft survival between the two groups was noted: three out of nine patients in the PE-IVIG-RTX group (33.3%) and 4/12 in the control group (33.3%) experienced loss of allograft function at a median time after diagnosis of 14 mo (min 12-max 18) and 15 mo (min 7-max 22), respectively. Kidney functional tests and proteinuria 24 mo after cAMR diagnosis were also similar in both groups. Only microvascular inflammation (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis score) was significantly reduced after PE-IVIG-RTX in seven out of eight patients (87.5%) in the PE-IVIG-RTX group (median score 3 in pre-treatment biopsy vs 1.5 in post-treatment biopsy; P = 0.047), without any impact on kidney survival and/or DSA characteristics. No functional or histological parameter at diagnosis was predictive of clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed no difference in the two year post-treatment outcome of kidney grafts treated with PE-IVIG-RTX for cAMR diagnosis, however there were notable improvements in microvascular inflammation in post-therapy protocol biopsies. Further studies, especially involving innovative therapeutic approaches, are required to improve the management and long-term results of this severe condition.

Failure to remove de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies is influenced by antibody properties and identifies kidney recipients with late antibody-mediated rejection destined to graft loss - a retrospective study

Current research is focusing on identifying bioclinical parameters for risk stratification of renal allograft loss, largely due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively investigated graft outcome predictors in 24 unsensitized pediatric kidney recipients developing HLA de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), and treated for late AMR with plasmapheresis + low-dose IVIG + Rituximab or high-dose IVIG + Rituximab. Renal function and DSA properties were assessed before and longitudinally post treatment. The estimated GFR (eGFR) decline after treatment was dependent on a negative % eGFR variation in the year preceding treatment (P = 0.021) but not on eGFR at treatment (P = 0.74). At a median follow-up of 36 months from AMR diagnosis, 10 patients lost their graft. Altered eGFR (P < 0.001) and presence of C3d-binding DSAs (P = 0.005) at treatment, and failure to remove DSAs (P = 0.01) were negatively associated with graft survival in the univariable analysis. Given the relevance of DSA removal for therapeutic success, we analyzed antibody properties dictating resistance to anti-humoral treatment. In the multivariable analysis, C3d-binding ability (P < 0.05), but not C1q-binding, and high mean fluorescence intensity (P < 0.05) were independent factors characterizing DSAs scarcely susceptible to removal. The poor prognosis of late AMR is related to deterioration of graft function prior to treatment and failure to remove C3d binding and/or high-MFI DSAs.

[Thrombotic microangiopathy/haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Histopathology update]

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) encompasses different entities known as haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). The histopathological characteristics have remained constant since the initial description and consist in glomerular-type affectation with the presence of double contours, mesangiolysis and microthrombi. It is generally accepted that the vascular damage is related to the prognosis. Ultrastructure, together with conventional histology, shows notable changes in both capillaries and endothelial cells. A comprehensive histopathological study of the renal biopsy, using electronmicroscopy, is useful in the confirmation of a clinical suspicion and demonstrates the pathogenetic mechanisms in the microcirculatory damage. The close resemblance between the ultrastructural appearance and that seen with the light microscope of TMA and transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is precisely what suggests that both entities are subject to the same etiopathogenetic mechanism in which the endothelial cell is targeted. Recent advances in the pathology of atypical HUS, its relation with complement system and the discovery of specific therapeutic targets, has rekindled an interest in the study of TMA and the importance of renal biopsy.

Clinical Outcome of Patients With De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (dnDSA) may cause graft loss in renal transplant recipients. The capability to bind the complement may help to stratify the risk for inferior outcomes associated with dnDSA. We developed a modified C1q-binding assay and hypothesized that C1q-binding dnDSA could differentiate between indolent and harmful dnDSA causing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 59 renal transplant recipients who developed dnDSA and had serum available and complete follow-up. All patients were analyzed for C1q-binding dnDSA at the time of dnDSA detection, and 1-year later or at time of AMR. AMR-positive patients were also tested 6 to 12 months before the event if IgG dnDSA was present.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 59 dnDSA patients developed AMR during 5.9 ± 3.1 years follow-up. AMR-positive patients had more dnDSA with a significant higher frequency of class I, a higher frequency and a higher mean fluorescence intensity value of C1q-dnDSA at all time-points. Death-censored AMR-free and allograft survivals were significantly lower in C1q-dnDSA patients. In multivariate analysis, C1q-dnDSA was an independent risk factor for AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

C1q-binding dnDSA is associated with inferior outcomes, yet not in all patients. Nevertheless, C1q-dnDSA was shown to be an independent risk factor of AMR and graft loss and may be a useful tool to stratify the immunological risk for AMR.

The detrimental impact of persistent vs an isolated occurrence of de novo donor-specific antibodies on intermediate-term renal transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) after renal transplant are associated with acute rejection (AR) and graft loss, yet most recipients with dnDSA have stable function and no AR. We assessed whether the persistence of dnDSA increased the risk of a detrimental outcome.

METHODS

A single-center review of renal transplant recipients monitored for dnDSA at multiple time points post-transplant. An Isolated dnDSA was defined as one positive dnDSA and no additional positive tests, whereas ≥2 positive dnDSA was defined as persistent dnDSA.

RESULTS

Of 708 recipients, 22% developed dnDSA, of whom 64% had persistent dnDSA. At median follow-up of 35 (range 12-74) months, there were fewer episodes of AR in the isolated dnDSA vs the persistent dnDSA group (2% vs 22%; P<.001,) and fewer graft losses with isolated dnDSA vs persistent dnDSA (0% vs 10%; P=.03). Within the persistent dnDSA group, recipients with dnDSA ≥60% of time points, had more AR (32% vs 16%, P=.10) and more graft losses (21% vs 2%; P=.003) than those with dnDSA<60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence of dnDSA resulted in more AR and graft failure than a single positive value. Recipients with longer duration of dnDSA persistence had an additional increased risk of AR and graft failure.

De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation are associated with impaired graft outcome independently of their C1q-binding ability

Many aspects of post-transplant monitoring of donor-specific (DSA) and non-donor-specific (nDSA) anti-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival are still unclear. Differentiating them by their ability to bind C1q may offer a better risk assessment. We retrospectively investigated the clinical relevance of de novo C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies on graft outcome in 611 renal transplant recipients. Acute rejection (AR), renal function, and graft survival were assessed within a mean follow-up of 6.66 years. Post-transplant 6.5% patients developed de novo DSA and 11.5% de novo nDSA. DSA (60.0%; P < 0.0001) but not nDSA (34.1%, P = 0.4788) increased rate of AR as compared with controls (27.4%). C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies did not alter rate of AR in both groups. Renal function was only significantly diminished in patients with DSAC1q⁺ . However, DSA significantly impaired 5-year graft survival (65.2%; P < 0.0001) in comparison with nDSA (86.7%; P = 0.0054) and controls (90.7%). While graft survival did not differ between DSAC1q^- and DSAC1q⁺ recipients, 5-year allograft survival was reduced in nDSAC1q⁺ (80.9%) versus nDSAC1q^- (90.7%, P = 0.0251). De novo DSA independently of their ability to bind C1q are associated with diminished graft survival.

Disparate rates of acute rejection and donor-specific antibodies among high-immunologic risk renal transplant subgroups receiving antithymocyte globulin induction

Lymphocyte-depleting induction lowers acute rejection (AR) rates among high-immunologic risk (HIR) renal transplant recipients, including African Americans (AAs), retransplants, and the sensitized. It is unclear whether different HIR subgroups experience similarly low rates of AR. We aimed to describe the incidence of AR and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) among HIR recipients categorized by age, race, or donor type. All received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. A total of 464 HIR recipients from 2007 to 2014 were reviewed. AR and dnDSA rates at 1 year for the entire population were 14% and 27%, respectively. AR ranged from 6.7% among living donor (LD) recipients to 30% in younger AA deceased donor (DD) recipients. De novo donor-specific antibody at 1 year ranged from 7% in older non-AA LD recipients to 32% in AAs. AA race remained as an independent risk factor for AR among DD recipients and for dnDSA among all HIR recipients. Development of both AR and dnDSA within the first year was associated with a 54% graft survival at 5 years and was an independent risk factor for graft loss. Despite utilization of recommended immunosuppression for HIR recipients, substantial disparities exist among subgroups, warranting further consideration of individualized immunosuppression in certain HIR subgroups.

Proteomics for rejection diagnosis in renal transplant patients: Where are we now?

Rejection is one of the key factors that determine the long-term allograft function and survival in renal transplant patients. Reliable and timely diagnosis is important to treat rejection as early as possible. Allograft biopsies are not suitable for continuous monitoring of rejection. Thus, there is an unmet need for non-invasive methods to diagnose acute and chronic rejection. Proteomics in urine and blood samples has been explored for this purpose in 29 studies conducted since 2003. This review describes the different proteomic approaches and summarizes the results from the studies that examined proteomics for the rejection diagnoses. The potential limitations and open questions in establishing proteomic markers for rejection are discussed, including ongoing trials and future challenges to this topic.

Clinical relevance of circulating antibodies and B lymphocyte markers in allograft rejection

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells.