Repeated human leukocyte antigen mismatches in lung re-transplantation

Lung Retransplantation

Lung retransplantation remains the standard treatment of irreversible lung allograft failure. The most common indications for lung retransplantation are acute graft failure, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and postoperative airway complications. Careful patient selection with regards to indications, anatomy, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (specifically renal dysfunction), and immunologic consideration are of utmost importance. The conduct of the lung retransplantation operation is arduous with special considerations given to operative approach, type of surgery (single vs bilateral), use of extracorporeal circulatory support, and hematological management. Outcomes have improved significantly for most patients, nearing short and midterm outcomes of primary lung recipients in select cases.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on lung transplant outcome

OBJECTIVES

Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between donor and recipient has a differential impact on the outcome after transplant (Tx) among transplantable solid organs. Although the lung is considered a highly antigenic organ, the impact of HLA matching between the donor and the recipient has been shown to be heterogeneous on lung Tx outcome. To provide further evidence that HLA matching should be considered in the decision process prior to lung Tx, we evaluated the impact of donor/recipient HLA mismatch on the outcome after lung Tx at our institution.

METHODS

All patients who underwent lung Tx were analysed in this retrospective single-cohort study between 1994 and 2013 for HLA (-A, -B or -DR) matching between the donor and the recipient and their association with overall survival, the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

RESULTS

In total, 371 (197 men) patients were included. Of these, 117 patients had no HLA match (0/6), 143 had a 1/6 match, 77 had 2/6 matches, 28 had 3/6 matches and 6 had 4/6 matches. One hundred and twenty-two (33%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of ACR and 172 (46%) patients developed CLAD. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between HLA mismatch and the development of CLAD, whereas multivariate analysis revealed that the number of HLA matches (hazard ratio 0.76; P = 0.002), antibodies to cytomegalovirus in either donors or recipients (hazard ratio 1.52; P = 0.036) and donor age (hazard ratio 1.03; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of CLAD. On the other hand, HLA matches did not correlate with the incidence of ACR and with the overall survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of HLA mismatches between donors and recipients after lung Tx did not correlate with ACR or with the overall survival. In contrast, HLA mismatch correlated with the development of CLAD and should therefore be considered a risk factor.

Immunoengineering of the Vascular Endothelium to Silence MHC Expression During Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

Disparities at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens and associated minor antigens trigger harmful immune responses, leading to graft rejection after transplantation. We showed that MHC-silenced cells and tissues are efficiently protected against rejection. In complex vascularized organs, the endothelium is the major interface between donor and recipient. This study therefore aimed to reduce the immunogenicity of the lung by silencing MHC expression on the endothelium. In porcine lungs, short-hairpin RNAs targeting beta-2-microglobulin and class II-transactivator transcripts were delivered by lentiviral vectors during normothermic ex vivo perfusion to silence swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) I and II expression permanently. The results demonstrated the feasibility of genetically engineering all lung regions, achieving a targeted silencing effect for SLA I and II of 67% and 52%, respectively, without affecting cell viability or tissue integrity. This decrease in immunogenicity carries the potential to generate immunologically invisible organs to counteract the burden of rejection and immunosuppression.

Predictive Utility of Lung Allocation Score for Retransplantation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Treatment of primary graft failure after lung transplantation (LTx) may include retransplantation (rLTx). The number of rLTx cases has doubled since implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005. The Lung Allocation Score was intended to predict LTx outcomes, but its predictive utility has not been assessed in rLTx. We investigated whether 1-year outcomes of LTx and rLTX were equally well predicted by the Lung Allocation Score.

METHODS

Recipients of LTx and rLTx aged 18 years or more were identified in 2005 to 2015 United Network for Organ Sharing data. The Lung Allocation Score was entered in multivariable logistic regression models of 1-year retransplant-free survival. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve summarized model predictive value. We examined whether the Lung Allocation Score and its components were differentially associated with outcomes of LTx and rLTx.

RESULTS

There were 16,837 LTx and 765 rLTx cases meeting inclusion criteria. Crude 1-year retransplant-free survival rates were 86% after LTx compared with 74% after rLTx. On univariate analysis, both LTx and rLTx cohorts showed poor predictive utility of the Lung Allocation Score (area under the curve 0.55 and 0.57, respectively; difference by transplant type, p = 0.307). Neither the Lung Allocation Score nor its components was differentially associated with LTx compared with rLTx outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lung Allocation Score achieved comparable, but poor, predictive utility for 1-year outcomes of primary LTx and rLTx. We found no evidence that Lung Allocation Score components should be weighted differently for rLTx candidates.