Pre-transplant AT1R antibodies correlate with early allograft rejection

Effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on graft function and survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients

HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are implicated in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), graft dysfunction and failure in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Non-HLA antibodies including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) may also play a role in AMR, impact graft function and survival. Data is limited in paediatric KT cohorts. We aimed to assess the prevalence and effect of pre-transplant AT1R antibodies on rejection, graft function and survival in paediatric KT recipients. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted across two paediatric centres including KT recipients with a pre-transplant AT1R antibody level. Outcomes included rejection, de novo DSA formation, graft function, failure, proteinuria and hypertension. Of 71 individuals, 72% recorded a positive pre-transplant AT1R Ab level (≥17 U/mL). Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, AT1R Ab positivity demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of rejection however was not statistically significant (HR 3.45, 95% CI 0.97-12.35, p-value 0.06). Sensitivity analysis with AT1R Ab levels of ≥25 U/mL (HR 2.05 95% CI 0.78-5.39, p-value 0.14) and ≥40 U/mL (HR 1.32, CI 95% 0.55-3.17, p-value 0.53) validated this. De novo DSA formation occurred more frequently with AT1R Ab positivity (41% vs. 20%, p-value 0.9). AT1R Ab was not associated with hypertension, proteinuria, graft failure or dysfunction. In conclusion, this cohort study demonstrated a high prevalence of pre-transplant AT1R Ab positivity (72%). AT1R Ab positivity demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of rejection and de novo DSA formation however did not meet statistical significance. There was no association between AT1R Ab and hypertension, proteinuria, graft failure or dysfunction.

Dynamics of HLA and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Alloantibodies, especially anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA antibodies), and autoantibodies, as angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R antibodies), may complicate the access and the course of transplantation. Pregnancy is a known source of HLA antibodies, with most studies evaluating pregnancy-induced sensitization by complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays, mainly after childbirth. AT1R antibodies have been evaluated in the context of preeclampsia. We aimed to evaluate pregnancy as a natural source of HLA antibodies and AT1R antibodies, their dynamics along gestation and the potential factors involved in antibody appearance.

METHODS

Serum samples from pregnant women were collected during the three trimesters of pregnancy (1T, 2T, 3T). Presence of HLA antibodies was assessed by screening beads on Luminex and AT1R antibodies by ELISA.

RESULTS

A cohort of 138 pregnant women were included. Samples from all were tested in 1T, 127 in 2T and 102 in 3T. HLA antibodies increased from 29.7 % (1T) to 38.2 % (3T). AT1R antibodies were stable around 30 % along pregnancy. Up to 43.2 % multiparous women had HLA antibodies, with a similar proportion of class I and class II antibodies. In primiparous women HLA antibodies increased along pregnancy (from 17.6 % to 34.1 %), with predominance of class II HLA antibodies. AT1R antibodies were not different in primiparous and multiparous women.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy is a relevant source of HLA antibodies sensitization, but not of AT1R antibodies. HLA antibodies increased clearly in primiparous women with predominance of class II. The use of newer solid-phase techniques on Luminex evidence a higher degree of HLA sensitization during pregnancy.

Non-HLA Antibodies to G Protein-coupled Receptors in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Short- and Long-term Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) and endothelin-type A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Abs) are G protein-coupled receptor activating autoantibodies associated with antibody-mediated rejection, vascular pathology, increased cytokines, allograft dysfunction, and allograft loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the first 2 y posttransplantation. The impact of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab positivity on longer-term 5-y transplant outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

One hundred pediatric kidney transplant recipients were tested for ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab on serially collected blood samples in the first 2 y posttransplant. Biopsies were collected per protocol and 6, 12, and 24 mo posttransplant and at any time during the 5-y follow-up period for clinical indication. Clinical outcomes, including renal dysfunction, rejection, HLA donor-specific antibodies, and allograft loss, were assessed through 5 y posttransplantation.

RESULTS

AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab were positive in 59% of patients. AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was associated with greater declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and de novo AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab was associated with allograft loss in the first 2 y posttransplant. There was no association between antibody positivity and rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, or allograft loss in the first 5 y posttransplant. In a model controlled for age, sex, immunosuppression, and HLA mismatch, AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was significantly associated with the development of HLA donor-specific antibodies at 5 y posttransplant (odds ratio 2.87, P  = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest temporally distinct clinical complications associated with AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity in pediatric patients; these injury patterns are of significant interest for developing effective treatment strategies.

Association between anti-endothelial antigen antibodies and allograft rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endothelial cells are vital in the transplant immune system as semiprofessional antigen-presenting cells. Few studies have investigated the importance of anti-endothelin subtype A receptor (ETAR) antibodies in kidney transplantation. Here, we aimed to analyze the association between anti-angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) and anti-ETAR antibodies and the association between the presence of anti-endothelial antibodies and the risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In total, 252 patients who underwent kidney transplantation were enrolled in this study. Antibodies for human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and non-HLAs were analyzed immediately before transplantation. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) or T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by 2017 Banff classification. All p-values were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients with anti-AT1R antibodies had a 3.49-fold higher risk of TCMR than those without anti-AT1R antibodies. Patients with anti-ETAR antibodies had a 5.84-fold higher risk of AMR than those without anti-ETAR antibodies. The hazard ratio of AMR in patients with both HLA DSAs and anti-ETAR antibodies, relative to patients without anti-ETAR antibodies and HLA DSAs, was 32.85 (95% CI = 1.82-592.91).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that anti-ETAR antibodies are associated with AMR, and patients with both anti-ETAR antibodies and de novo HLA DSAs were at a high risk of AMR.

Natural Antibodies Are Associated With Rejection and Long-term Renal Allograft Loss in a Multicenter International Cohort

BACKGROUND

Potentially harmful nonhuman leukocyte antigen antibodies have been identified in renal transplantation, including natural immunoglobulin G antibodies (Nabs) reactive to varied antigenic structures, including apoptotic cells.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we assessed Nabs by reactivity to apoptotic cells in sera collected from 980 kidney transplant recipients across 4 centers to determine their association with graft outcomes.

RESULTS

Elevated pretransplant Nabs were associated with graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-6.39; P   =  0.0232), the composite endpoint of graft loss or severe graft dysfunction (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.13-5.10; P  = 0.0232), and T cell-mediated rejection (odds ratio [OR] 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-3.02; P  = 0.0310). High pretransplant Nabs together with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were associated with increased risk of composite outcomes (HR 6.31; 95% CI, 1.81-22.0; P  = 0.0039). In patients with high pretransplant Nabs, the subsequent development of posttransplant Nabs was associated with both T cell-mediated rejection (OR 3.64; 95% CI, 1.61-8.36; P  = 0.0021) and mixed rejection (OR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.02-9.75; P  = 0.0473). Finally, elevated pre- and posttransplant Nabs combined with DSAs were associated with increased risk of composite outcomes (HR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.51-10.43; P  = 0.0052) and T cell-mediated rejection (OR 7.28; 95% CI, 2.16-25.96; P  = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of pre- and posttransplant Nabs, together with DSAs, was associated with increased risk of poor graft outcomes and rejection after renal transplantation.

The Influence of Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor on the Outcome of Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Allo- and autoimmune mechanisms are involved in kidney allograft rejection and loss. This study investigates the impact of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1RAbs) detected alone or in association with HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs) on the outcome of kidney transplantation (KTx). Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected in 71 kidney transplant (KT) recipients who developed biopsy-proven acute or chronic active T-cell rejection (TCMR) (n = 51) or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (n = 20), forming the rejection group (RG). The control group (CG) included 71 KTx recipients with comparable characteristics without rejection. All patients had been transplanted with negative T/B flow crossmatch (T/BFCXM). The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Antibodies were determined pre- and periodically post-KTx by Luminex method for HLA-DSAs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-AT1RAbs. Before KTx, twenty-three (32.4%) patients in the RG, sixteen with TCMR and seven with ABMR, were found anti-AT1Rabs-positive (≥10 U/mL) versus eleven (15.5%) patients in the CG (p = 0.031). Simultaneous detection of preformed anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs was found in five patients of the RG versus two of the CG (p = 0.355). At the time of transplant biopsy, fifteen (21.1%) patients, four with ABMR and eleven with TCMR, were positive for anti-AT1RAbs. Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected simultaneously in 7/15 (46.7%) cases, three with ABMR and four with TCMR. During the follow-up, thirteen (18.3%) patients in the RG, eight with ABMR and five with TCMR, lost their graft compared to one patient (1.4%) in the CG (p = 0.001). Six out of thirteen (46.2%) RG patients who lost the graft were found positive for anti-AT1RAbs pretransplant. Patient survival with functioning graft did not differ significantly between anti-AT1Rabs-positive and negative KT recipients (log-rank p = 0.88). Simultaneous detection of anti-ATR1Abs and HLA-DSAs did not have a significant influence on patient survival with functioning graft (log-rank p = 0.96). Graft function at the end of the follow-up was better, but not significantly, in anti-AT1Rabs-negative patients, with serum creatinine 1.48 [1.20-1.98] mg/dL and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 48.5 [33.5-59.0] mL/min/1.73 m², compared to anti-AT1Rabs-positive ones who had serum creatinine 1.65 [1.24-2.02] mg/dL (p = 0.394) and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 47.0 [34.8-60.3] mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.966). Anti-AT1RAbs detection pretransplant characterizes KT recipients at increased risk of cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. Furthermore, anti-AT1RAbs, detected alone or simultaneously with HLA-DSAs, appear to be associated with impaired graft function, but their role in graft survival has not been documented in this study. Screening for these antibodies appears to complement pretransplant immunological risk assessment.

Loss of anti-AT1R reactivity in ELISA post-adsorption - False reactivity or interference in the assay?

Autoantibodies to Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are associated with detrimental outcomes in organ transplants. However, reports showed that adsorption with latex beads reduced positive anti-AT1R antibodies, suggesting possible false reactivity. To investigate this conundrum, we studied 11 samples positive for AT1R antibodies with an ELISA kit before and after adsorption. Adsorption significantly reduced the measurable level of AT1R antibodies (28.3 ± 9.8 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0 U/ml, p < 0.001). AT1R antibodies were lower when post-adsorption serum was added back at 1:1 ratio to the neat serum compared to the diluent control (8.6 ± 4.2 vs. 18.1 ± 10.3 U/ml, p = 0.02). Sham adsorption with the buffer from Adsorb Out™ kit without beads also suppressed the detection of anti-AT1R antibodies (32.7 ± 9.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9 U/ml, p < 0.001). Thus, rather than actively removing nonspecific antibodies by the beads, the adsorption process introduces soluble factors that interfere with the detection of anti-AT1R antibodies with the ELISA kit.

Rejection and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with and without angiotensin II receptor type 1 antibodies

AIM

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R Ab) is a non-Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) antibody that is maybe associated with early severe kidney transplant rejection and worse graft outcomes. This study aimed to assess the association between AT1R Ab and kidney transplant rejection and graft outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult kidney transplant recipients in an Australian centre who had an AT1R Ab test between 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2020. AT1R Ab positive patients were compared to AT1R Ab negative patients. Primary outcomes were rejection risk, type and histopathological severity scores. Secondary outcomes were 8-week graft function and graft loss.

RESULTS

Of 965 kidney transplants that were performed during the study period, 73 patients had AT1R Ab tested; 16 (22%) were positive and 57(78%) were negative. Positive patients were on average younger and had higher level of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Rejection occurred in 13 (81%) positive patients and 41 (72%) negative patients (P = 0.45). No significant differences in rejection type or severity were found. HLA mismatch and peak panel reactive antibody ≥80%, but not AT1R Ab, independently predicted rejection. Average (132 vs. 177 mmol/L, P = 0.302) and graft loss were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no evidence that AT1R Ab is associated with rejection type, severity or worse graft function. Future studies should assess its relationship with graft outcomes to help complement immunological risk assessment and potentially provide therapeutic options to alter outcomes.

Alloimmune risk assessment for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: A practical proposal

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although an improvement in graft survival has been observed in the last decades with the use of different immunosuppressive drugs, this is still limited in time with antibody-mediated rejection being a main cause of graft-loss. Immune monitoring and risk assessment of antibody-mediated rejection before and after kidney transplantation with useful biomarkers is key to tailoring treatments to achieve the best outcomes. Here, we provide a review of the rationale and several accessible tools for immune monitoring, from the most classic to the modern ones. Finally, we end up discussing a practical proposal for alloimmune risk assessment in kidney transplantation, including histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies, HLA molecular mismatch analysis and characterization of peripheral blood immune cells.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Chronic Active T-Cell Mediated Kidney Rejection as a Clinically Significant Type of Allograft Loss?

The purpose of this article is to assess the present knowledge about chronic active (CA) T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) of a kidney. In the research authors review current Banff diagnostic criteria used in kidney rejection, focus on their possible future evolution, and investigate the role of currently available molecular methods that could be implemented into the diagnostic scheme. Research also points out previously and currently available treatment methods applied to CA TCMR and takes into account possible side effects consequent upon the therapy. Moreover, attention is being paid to the CA TCMR coincidence with other kidney rejection types such as antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and its influence on the treatment approach. Authors also mark the possibility of non-HLA antibodies coexistence in patients with CA TCMR and describe its possible resonance on kidney allograft function. Nonetheless, it seems that current knowledge about CA TCMR is not sufficient and requires further investigation.

Pre-transplant angiotensin II receptor type I antibodies in pediatric renal transplant recipients: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) in pediatric renal transplantation is unclear. Here, we evaluated pre-transplant AT1R-Ab on transplant outcomes in the first 5 years. Secondary analysis compared pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels by age.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients, 2-20 years old, were divided into two groups: pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- (<17 U/ml; n = 18) and pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (≥17 U/ml; n = 18). eGFR was determined at 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 4-year post-transplant. Allograft biopsies were performed in the setting of strong HLA-DSA (MFI > 10 000), AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml, and/or elevated creatinine.

RESULTS

Mean age in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- was 13.3 years vs. 11.0 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (p = 0.16). At 6 months, mean eGFR was 111.3 ml/min/1.73 m² in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- vs. 100.2 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + at 1 year, 103.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 100.5; at 2 years, 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. and 93.7; at 4 years, 72.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 80.9. 11/36 patients had acute rejection (6 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab-, 5 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + ). There was no difference in rejection rates. All 6 subjects with de novo HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml at the time of biopsy experienced rejection. Mean age in those with the AT1R-Ab ≥40 U/ml was 10.0 years vs. 13.2 in those <40 U/ml (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In our small cohort, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml was not associated with reduced graft function or rejection. The pathogenicity of pre-transplant AT1R-Ab in pediatric kidney transplantation requires further investigation.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients

BACKGROUND

The role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients.

METHODS

Nineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform.

RESULTS

Eleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti-non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.

Levels of angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies correlate with antibody-mediated rejection and poor graft function in kidney-transplantation patients

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Ab) are non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that can elicit adverse effects on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. We investigated the correlation between levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab and postoperative outcomes in KT recipients.

METHODS

Pre-KT and post-KT serum from 79 patients was collected. Post-KT serum was collected within 1 year after KT or simultaneously as the biopsy. Levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. AT1R-Ab >17.0 U/mL and ETAR-Ab >10.0 U/mL was considered to denote positivity according to manufacturer recommendations. We measured donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) levels using LABScreen™ single-antigen kits.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (54 men, 25 women) formed the study cohort. Seven (8.7%) patients were positive for AT1R-Ab, 25 (31.6%) patients were positive for both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab, and 47 (59.5%) were negative for both antibodies at all time points. No patients died during the study period. Patients with both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were associated with a higher prevalence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, but not allograft loss or delayed graft function. AT1R-Ab were associated with T-cell-mediated rejection, but the association was not significant. HLA-DSA were associated significantly with a higher creatinine level in serum at 12 months and 24 months in patients with AT1R-Ab and/or ETAR-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1R-Ab, ETAR-Ab, and HLA-DSA were associated with a higher prevalence of AMR and decline in graft function. Measurement of levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab in KT patients may be useful for stratification of immunological risk and identification of patients at a high risk of adverse graft outcome.

Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Antigen and Cell-Based Assays for the Detection of Non-HLA Antibodies

To date, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been the major focus in the approach to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMBR) in solid-organ transplantation. However, evidence from the clinic and published studies has shown that non-HLA antibodies, particularly anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs), are found either in the context of AMBR or synergistically in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Numerous studies have explored the influence of AECAs on clinical outcomes, yet the determination of the exact clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation is not fully established. This is due to highly heterogeneous study designs including differences in testing methods and outcome measures. Efforts to develop reliable and sensitive diagnostic non-HLA antibody tests are continuously made. This is essential considering the technical difficulties of non-HLA antibody assays and the large variation in reported incidences of antibodies. In addition, it is important to take donor specificity into account in order to draw clinically relevant conclusions from non-HLA antibody assays. Here, we provide an overview of non-HLA solid-phase and cell-based crossmatch assays for use in solid-organ transplantation that are currently available, either in a research setting or commercially.

Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type 1 and Endothelin 1 Type A Receptors in Cardiovascular Pathologies

Angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and endothelin-1 receptor type A (ETAR) are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed on the surface of a great variety of cells: immune cells, vascular smooth cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts express ETAR and AT1R, which are activated by endothelin 1 (ET1) and angiotensin II (AngII), respectively. Certain autoantibodies are specific for these receptors and can regulate their function, thus being known as functional autoantibodies. The function of these antibodies is similar to that of natural ligands, and it involves not only vasoconstriction, but also the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin-6 (IL6), IL8 and TNF-α), collagen production by fibroblasts, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) release by fibroblasts and neutrophils. The role of autoantibodies against AT1R and ETAR (AT1R-AAs and ETAR-AAs, respectively) is well described in the pathogenesis of many medical conditions (e.g., systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-associated pulmonary hypertension, cystic fibrosis, and allograft dysfunction), but their implications in cardiovascular diseases are still unclear. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the effects of AT1R-AAs and ETAR-AAs in cardiovascular pathologies, highlighting their roles in heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support, preeclampsia, and acute coronary syndromes.

Effect of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies on the outcomes of kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been recognized as non-HLA antibodies associated with allograft rejection and poor allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk anti-AT1R-Abs pose for rejection and graft loss among kidney transplant populations.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published from inception until June 2021 to identify all studies concerning the role AT1R-Abs play in the clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted outcome data, and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis was summarized using the fixed-effects models or random-effects models, according to heterogeneity. The major outcomes included delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss, or patient death after transplantation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eligible studies involving a total of 4,023 kidney transplantation recipients were included in the evaluation to identified. Meta-analysis results showed that the AT1R-Ab positive kidney transplant (KT) group had a greater incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (RR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.61-2.33, P < 0.00001) and graft loss (RR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.50-3.75, P = 0.0002) than did the AT1R-Abs negative KT group. There was no significant statistical difference in delayed graft function rate, T-cell mediated rejection, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection, and patient death rate between AT1R-Ab positive KT and AT1R-Ab negative KT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the presence of anti-AT1R-Abs was associated with a significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. Future studies are still needed to evaluate the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting. These results shows that assessment of anti-AT1R-Abs would be helpful in determining immunologic risk and susceptibility to immunologic events for recipients.

Immunosuppression as a Risk Factor for De Novo Angiotensin II Type Receptor Antibodies Development after Kidney Transplantation

(1) Background: Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KT). Data regarding the risk factors associated with de novo AT1R-Ab development are lacking. Our goal was to identify the incidence of de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT and to evaluate the risk factors associated with their formation. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56 adult patients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. Recipient, donor, transplant, treatment, and complications data were assessed. A threshold of >10 U/mL was used for AT1R-Ab detection. (3) Results: De novo AT1R-Ab were observed in 12 out of 56 KT recipients (21.4%). The median value AT1R-Ab in the study cohort was 8.5 U/mL (inter quartile range: 6.8–10.4) and 15.6 U/mL (10.8–19.8) in the positive group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (OR = 7.20, 95% CI: 1.30–39.65, p = 0.02), maintenance immunosuppression with immediate-release tacrolimus (OR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.16–41.51, p = 0.03), and mean tacrolimus trough level (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14–4.85, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT. (4) Conclusions: De novo AT1R-Ab development at 1 year after KT is significantly influenced by the type of induction and maintenance immunosuppression.

Increased Autoantibodies Against Ro/SS-A, CENP-B, and La/SS-B in Patients With Kidney Allograft Antibody-mediated Rejection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) causes more than 50% of late kidney graft losses. In addition to anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies, antibodies against non-HLA antigens are also linked to AMR. Identifying key non-HLA antibodies will improve our understanding of AMR.

Association of non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets and donor-specific HLA antibodies with antibody-mediated rejection and graft function in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets have been implicated in the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but data in pediatric patients are scarce.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a carefully phenotyped single-center (University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany) cohort of 62 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (mean age at transplantation, 8.6 ± 5.0 years) at increased risk of graft function deterioration. Patients had received their transplant between January 1, 1999, and January 31, 2010. We examined at time of late index biopsies (more than 1-year post-transplant, occurring after January 2004) the association of antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁R), the endothelin type A receptor (ET_AR), the MHC class I chain-like gene A (MICA), and vimentin in conjunction with overall and complement-binding donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA) with graft histology and function.

RESULTS

We observed a high prevalence (62.9%) of non-HLA antibody positivity. Seventy-two percent of HLA-DSA positive patients showed additional positivity for at least one non-HLA antibody. Antibodies against AT₁R, ET_AR, and MICA were associated with the histological phenotype of ABMR. The cumulative load of HLA-DSA and non-HLA antibodies in circulation was related to the degree of microinflammation in peritubular capillaries. Non-HLA antibody positivity was an independent non-invasive risk factor for graft function deterioration (adjusted hazard ratio 6.38, 95% CI, 2.11-19.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the combined detection of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets may allow a more comprehensive assessment of the patients' immune responses against the kidney allograft and facilitates immunological risk stratification.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Epitope Mismatches in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Histological Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Correlation between antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) is strong but imperfect in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, raising the possibility of undetected HLA-DSA or non-HLA antibodies contributing to ABMR. Detailed evaluation of the degree of HLA matching together with the identification of non-HLA antibodies in KT may help to decipher the antibody involved.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed patients with transplant biopsies scored following Banff'15 classification. Pre- and post-transplant serum samples were checked for HLA and non-HLA antibodies [MICA-Ab, angiotensin-II type-1-receptor (AT1R)-Ab, endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR)-Ab and crossmatches with primary aortic endothelial cells (EC-XM)]. We also analyzed HLA epitope mismatches (HLA-EM) between donors and recipients to explore their role in ABMR histology (ABMRh) with and without HLA-DSA.

Results

One-hundred eighteen patients with normal histology (n = 19), ABMRh (n = 52) or IFTA (n = 47) were studied. ABMRh patients were HLA-DSApos (n = 38, 73%) or HLA-DSAneg (n = 14, 27%). Pre-transplant HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab were more frequent in ABMRh compared with IFTA and normal histology cases (p = 0.006 and 0.003), without differences in other non-HLA antibodies. Only three ABMRhDSAneg cases showed non-HLA antibodies. ABMRhDSAneg and ABMRhDSApos cases showed similar biopsy changes and graft-survival. Both total class II and DRB1 HLA-EM were associated with ABMRhDSApos but not with ABMRhDSAneg. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant HLA-DSA (OR: 3.69 [1.31-10.37], p = 0.013) and AT1R-Ab (OR: 5.47 [1.78-16.76], p = 0.003) were independent predictors of ABMRhDSApos.

Conclusions

In conclusion, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab is frequently found in ABMRhDSApos patients. However, AT1R-Ab, MICA-Ab, ETAR-Ab or EC-XM+ are rarely found among ABMRhDSAneg patients. Pre-transplant AT1R-Ab may act synergistically with preformed or de novo HLA-DSA to produce ABMRhDSApos but not ABMRhDSAneg. HLA epitope mismatch associates with ABMRhDSApos compared with ABMRhDSAneg, suggesting factors other than HLA are responsible for the damage.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Clinical Relevance and Treatment Options for Antibody-mediated Rejection Associated With Non-HLA Antibodies

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell-dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

The role of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: a complex deliberation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is tremendous interest in understanding when, if, and how non-HLA antibodies contribute to allograft injury. Numerous non-HLA target antigens have been identified and sensitization to these targets have been associated with delayed allograft function, rejection, and allograft failure. This review focuses on the clinical utility of HLA antibody testing, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current clinical studies, and the need for defining characteristics to inform non-HLA antibody pathogenicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies continue to show associations between non-HLA antibodies and rejection and reduced allograft survival across multiple transplanted organ types. The worst clinical outcomes continue to be observed among recipients testing positive for both non-HLA and donor-specific HLA antibodies. Mechanistic insights from both animal and clinical studies support a model in which tissue injury accompanied by an inflammatory environment influence non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity.

SUMMARY

Immune triggers that lead to non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity are complex and poorly understood. The ability of non-HLA antibodies to mediate allograft injury may depend upon their affinity and strength (titer), target specificity, density of the target antigen, and synergy with donor-specific HLA antibodies.

Presentation and Outcomes of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Associated With Angiotensin II Receptor 1 Antibodies Among Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

It remains challenging to manage antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) associated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) in kidney transplant recipients and the outcomes are not well defined. We describe the presentation, clinical course, and outcomes of this condition.

METHODS

This retrospective study included kidney transplant recipients with AT1R-Ab levels ≥10 units/mL and biopsy-proven ABMR in the absence of significant HLA-donor-specific antibodies at the time of rejection.

RESULTS

We identified 13 recipients. Median creatinine (Cr) at rejection was significantly higher (2.05 mg/dL) compared with baseline (1.2 mg/dL), P = .006. After ABMR management, the difference in median Cr was not significant (1.5 mg/dL), P = .152. Median AT1R-Ab level was higher in the pretransplant sample (34.5 units/mL) compared with the level at rejection (19 units/mL) and after rejection treatment (13 units/mL); however, these differences were not significant, P = .129. Eight of the 13 recipients received antibody reduction therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin, and 5 of the 13 recipients had other therapies. After rejection management, 6 of the 13 recipients had improvement in Cr to baseline and 7 of the 13 recipients had > 50% reduction in proteinuria.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1R-Ab-associated ABMR management and outcomes depend on the clinical presentation and may include antibody-reducing therapies among other therapies. Further prospective cohorts will improve recognizing and managing this condition.

Pre-Transplant Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies and Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies Predict Graft Function and Allograft Rejection in a Low-Risk Kidney Transplantation Setting

Background

Non-HLA antibodies, anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), are known to play a role in allograft rejection. We evaluated the role of both antibodies in predicting post-transplant outcomes in low-risk living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients.

Methods

In 94 consecutive LDKT recipients who were ABO compatible and negative for pre-transplant HLA donor-specific antibodies, we determined the levels of anti-AT1Rs using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the presence of AECAs using a flow cytometric endothelial cell crossmatch (ECXM) assay with pre-transplant sera. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated to predict post-transplant outcomes.

Results

Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs (≥11.5 U/mL) and AECAs were observed in 36 (38.3%) and 22 recipients (23.4%), respectively; 11 recipients had both. Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs were a significant risk factor for the development of acute rejection (AR) (HR 2.09; P=0.018), while a positive AECA status was associated with AR or microvascular inflammation only (HR 2.47; P=0.004) throughout the follow-up period. In particular, AECA (+) recipients with ≥11.5 U/mL anti-AT1Rs exhibited a significant effect on creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001; P=0.028), although the risk of AR was not significant.

Conclusions

Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs and AECAs have independent negative effects on post-transplant outcomes in low-risk LDKT recipients. Assessment of both antibodies would be helpful in stratifying the pre-transplant immunological risk, even in low-risk LDKT recipients.

Endothelin Type A Receptor Antibodies Are Associated With Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies, Vascular Inflammation, and Decline in Renal Function in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Autoantibody to angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab) has been recognized as a non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody relevant in transplantation. Endothelin type A receptor antibody (ETAR-Ab) has been strongly associated with AT1R-Ab, but the data in kidney transplantation are scarce.

Methods

We examined the relationship of ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab with clinical outcomes, biopsy findings, inflammatory cytokines, and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a cohort of pediatric renal transplant recipients. Sixty-five patients were longitudinally monitored for ETAR-Ab, AT1R-Ab, HLA DSA, interleukin (IL)-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β, interferon-γ, IL-17, IL-6, renal dysfunction, hypertension, rejection, and allograft loss during the first 2 years post-transplant.

Results

Fifteen patients (23%) had AT1R-Ab alone, 1 (2%) had ETAR-Ab alone, 23 (35%) had both ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab, and 26 (40%) were negative for both antibodies at all timepoints. Having both ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab was associated with >30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.024), arteritis (P = 0.016), and elevated IL-8 levels (P = 0.010), but not rejection, HLA DSA, or allograft loss. Having both antibodies resulted in greater increases in IL-8 compared with AT1R-Ab alone, even when controlled for additional clinical factors, including HLA DSA (P = 0.012).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that, in pediatric kidney transplantation, ETAR-Ab is highly associated with AT1R-Ab, but there are a subset of patients with AT1R-Ab alone. Having both antibodies is significantly associated with arteritis, elevated IL-8, and decline in renal function, and our results suggest possible interaction effects. Better understanding of this interaction may be informative in developing protocols for testing, treatment, and prevention of allograft injury.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.

Successful A2 to B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant after Desensitization for High-Strength Non-HLA Antibody Made Possible by Utilizing a Hepatitis C Positive Donor

Desensitization using plasma exchange can remove harmful antibodies prior to transplantation and mitigate risks for hyperacute and severe early acute antibody-mediated rejection. Traditionally, the use of plasma exchange requires a living donor so that the timing of treatments relative to transplant can be planned. Non-HLA antibody is increasingly recognized as capable of causing antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection and has been associated with decreased graft longevity. Our patient had high-strength non-HLA antibody deemed prohibitive to transplantation without desensitization, but no living donors. As the patient was eligible to receive an A2 ABO blood group organ and was willing to accept a hepatitis C positive donor kidney, this afforded a high probability of receiving an offer within a short enough time frame to attempt empiric desensitization in anticipation of a deceased donor transplant. Fifteen plasma exchange treatments were performed before the patient received an organ offer, and the patient was successfully transplanted. Hepatitis C infection was treated posttransplant. No episodes of rejection were observed. At one-year posttransplant, the patient maintains good graft function. In this case, willingness to consider nontraditional donor organs enabled us to mimic living donor desensitization using a deceased donor.

Clinical and pathological features of thrombotic microangiopathy influencing long-term kidney transplant outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in post-transplant setting has heterogeneous clinical manifestations.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied data of 89 patients with post-transplant TMA, which was characterized by thrombi in at least one glomerulus and/or arteriole. Systemic TMA was defined by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic anemia and early onset TMA, when occurred less than 90 days post transplant.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence was 0.93%. The majority of the recipients were young (mean age 39 years), female (52%) and Caucasian (48%) with primary kidney disease of unknown etiology (37%). Early TMA occurred in 51% of the patients and systemic TMA, in 25%. Underlying precipitating factors were: infection (54%), acute rejection (34%), calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (13%) and pregnancy (3%). 18% of the patients had several triggers. Glomerular TMA was observed in 50% of the biopsies and endothelial cell activation, in 61%. The 1-year patient survival was 97% and corresponding graft survival, 66%. Allograft survival was inferior when acute antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) occurred (with 41%; without 70%, p = 0.01), however no differences were determined by hemolysis, time of onset, thrombi location or endothelial cell activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that post-transplant TMA is a rare but severe condition, regardless of its clinical and histological presentation, mainly when associated to ABMR.

Angiotensin II type I receptor agonistic autoantibodies are associated with poor allograft survival in liver retransplantation

Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) agonistic autoantibodies (AT1R-AA) are detrimental to kidney transplantation. Early studies suggested a similar negative effect in primary liver transplantation. Here, we studied AT1R-AA in a retrospective cohort of 94 patients who received a second liver transplant to determine their prevalence and effects. The concentrations of preformed AT1R-AA before transplantation were higher (P = .019) in the 48 patients who lost their liver grafts than in the 46 patients whose grafts survived. About half (48/94, 51.1%) of the patients were positive for AT1R-AA >17 U/mL before the second liver transplantation. In 22 (23.4%) patients, strong positive AT1R-AA (defined as >40 U/mL) were detected, of whom 16 (72.7%) patients lost their grafts. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with strong positive AT1R-AA had significantly worse graft survival than those with AT1R-AA <40 U/mL (P = .035). In multivariate Cox models that included confounders such as sex and age, either AT1R-AA >40 U/mL (HR = 1.999 [1.085-3.682], P = .026) or increased concentrations of AT1R-AA (HR = 1.003 [1.001-1.006] per incremental U/mL, P = .019) were significantly associated with elevated risk for graft loss. In conclusion, our data indicate that there is a high prevalence of AT1R-AA in candidates for second liver transplantation and that their presence is associated with inferior long-term outcomes of the second graft.

Antibodies against ARHGDIB are associated with long-term kidney graft loss

The clinical significance of non-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival is a matter of debate, due to differences in reported results and lack of large-scale studies incorporating analysis of multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously. We developed a multiplex non-HLA antibody assay against 14 proteins highly expressed in the kidney. In this study, the presence of pretransplant non-HLA antibodies was correlated to renal allograft survival in a nationwide cohort of 4770 recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2006. Autoantibodies against Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 (ARHGDIB) were significantly associated with graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased-donor kidney (N = 3276) but not in recipients of a living-donor kidney (N = 1496). At 10 years after deceased-donor transplantation, recipients with anti-ARHGDIB antibodies (94/3276 = 2.9%) had a 13% lower death-censored covariate-adjusted graft survival compared to the anti-ARHGDIB-negative (3182/3276 = 97.1%) population (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.53; P = .0003). These antibodies occur independently from donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) or other non-HLA antibodies investigated. No significant relations with graft loss were found for the other 13 non-HLA antibodies. We suggest that pretransplant risk assessment can be improved by measuring anti-ARHGDIB antibodies in all patients awaiting deceased-donor transplantation.

Results and reflections from the PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions in kidney transplantation: A mini-review

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The waiting time for a deceased donor kidney in the Netherlands is approximately 3 years. Mortality among patients on the waiting list is high. The aim of the PROCARE consortium (PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions) was to decrease the waiting time by providing a matching algorithm yielding a prolonged graft survival and less HLA-immunization compared with the currently used Eurotransplant Kidney allocation system. In this study, 6097 kidney transplants carried out between January 1995 and December 2005 were re-examined with modern laboratory techniques and insights that were not available during that time period. In this way, we could identify potential new parameters that can be used to improve the matching algorithm and prolong graft survival. All eight University Medical Centers in the Netherlands participated in this multicenter study. To improve the matching algorithm, we used as central hypothesis that the combined presence of class-I and -II single-antigen bead (SAB)-defined donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) prior to transplantation, non-HLA antibodies, the number of B- and/or T-cell epitopes recognized on donor HLA, and specific polymorphisms in effector mechanisms of IgG were associated with an increased risk for graft failure. The purpose of this article is to relate the results obtained from the PROCARE consortium study to other studies published in recent years. The clinical relevance of SAB-defined DSA, complement-fixing DSA, non-HLA antibodies, and the effector functions of (non)-HLA-antibodies will be discussed.

Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type 1 and Endothelin A Receptors: Relevance and pathogenicity

Antibodies against two G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin A receptor (ETAR) are among a growing number of autoantibodies that are found to be associated with allograft dysfunction. AT1R antibodies (AT1Rabs) and ETAR antibodies (ETARabs) have been shown to activate their target receptors and affect signaling pathways. Multiple single center reports have shown an association between presence of these antibodies and acute or chronic rejection and graft loss in kidney, heart, liver, lung and composite tissue transplantations. However, the characteristics of patients that are most likely to develop adverse outcomes, the phenotypes associated with graft damage solely due to these antibodies, and the antibody titer required to cause dysfunction are areas that remain controversial. This review compiles existing knowledge on the effect of antibodies against GPCRs in other diseases in order to bridge the gap in knowledge within transplantation biology. Future areas for research are highlighted and include the need for functional assays and treatment protocols for transplant patients who present with AT1Rabs and ETARabs. Understanding how antibodies that activate GPCRs influence transplantation outcome will have direct clinical implications for preemptive evaluation of transplant candidates as well as the post-transplant care of organ recipients.

Sensitization to endothelial cell antigens: Unraveling the cause or effect paradox

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) have been correlated with increased acute and chronic rejection across all organ types and early graft dysfunction in kidney and heart transplantation. Nevertheless, the lack of appropriate tools and clear criteria for defining injurious versus non-injurious AECAs prohibits their routine inclusion in clinical risk assessments and diagnostic algorithms for antibody mediated injury. Clinical characterization of AECAs is complicated due to the wide range of polymorphic and non-polymorphic antigens expressed across different vascular tissues and the diverse array of specificities observed between individuals. This complexity is also reflected in the broad spectrum of reported injury phenotypes. AECAs detected at time of allograft dysfunction may represent biomarkers of past vascular injury or active contributors to a current rejection process. New tools within the fields of proteomics, genomics, bioinformatics, and imaging are currently being validated and hold great promise for unraveling the AECA paradox.

Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies in pediatric solid organ transplant

Minimizing immunologic complications is critical for long-term patient survival in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. Multiple factors distinguish pediatric from adult organ transplant recipients which may influence the risk and manifestations of immunologic responses. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) is a non-HLA antibody that has been has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients. There is now limited evidence available to suggest that AT1R-Ab may be an important part of the immunologic milieu impacting pediatric organ transplant outcomes and that differences in this phenomenon may exist between pediatric and adult patients. The mechanisms by which autoimmunity is provoked and mediates organ dysfunction in childhood and effective treatment options require further research.

Early Acute Microvascular Kidney Transplant Rejection in the Absence of Anti-HLA Antibodies Is Associated with Preformed IgG Antibodies against Diverse Glomerular Endothelial Cell Antigens

BACKGROUND

Although anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) cause most antibody-mediated rejections of renal allografts, non-anti-HLA Abs have also been postulated to contribute. A better understanding of such Abs in rejection is needed.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide study to identify kidney transplant recipients without anti-HLA donor-specific Abs who experienced acute graft dysfunction within 3 months after transplantation and showed evidence of microvascular injury, called acute microvascular rejection (AMVR). We developed a crossmatch assay to assess serum reactivity to human microvascular endothelial cells, and used a combination of transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to identify non-HLA Abs.

RESULTS

We identified a highly selected cohort of 38 patients with early acute AMVR. Biopsy specimens revealed intense microvascular inflammation and the presence of vasculitis (in 60.5%), interstitial hemorrhages (31.6%), or thrombotic microangiopathy (15.8%). Serum samples collected at the time of transplant showed that previously proposed anti-endothelial cell Abs-angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), endothelin-1 type A and natural polyreactive Abs-did not increase significantly among patients with AMVR compared with a control group of stable kidney transplant recipients. However, 26% of the tested AMVR samples were positive for AT1R Abs when a threshold of 10 IU/ml was used. The crossmatch assay identified a common IgG response that was specifically directed against constitutively expressed antigens of microvascular glomerular cells in patients with AMVR. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified new targets of non-HLA Abs, with little redundancy among individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that preformed IgG Abs targeting non-HLA antigens expressed on glomerular endothelial cells are associated with early AMVR, and that in vitro cell-based assays are needed to improve risk assessments before transplant.

Cytokine Profiles Associated With Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies

Introduction

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab), is a non–human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody implicated in poor renal allograft outcomes, although its actions may be mediated through a different pathway than HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Our aim was to examine serum cytokine profiles associated with AT1R-Ab and distinguish them from those associated with HLA DSA in serially collected blood samples from a cohort of pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Methods

Blood samples from 65 pediatric renal transplant recipients drawn during the first 3 months posttransplant, at 6, 12, and 24 months posttransplant, and during suspected episodes of kidney transplant rejection were tested for AT1R-Ab, HLA DSA, and a panel of 6 cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interferon [IFN]-γ, interleukin [IL]-8, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17). Associations between antibodies and cytokines were evaluated.

Results

AT1R-Ab, but not HLA DSA, was associated with elevations in TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17. This relationship remained significant even after controlling for relevant clinical factors and was consistent across all time points. In contrast to HLA DSA, AT1R-Ab was associated with elevations in vascular inflammatory cytokines in the first 2 years posttransplant.

Conclusions

This profile of vascular cytokines may be informative for clinical monitoring and designing future studies to delineate the distinct pathophysiology of AT1R-Ab–mediated allograft injury in kidney transplantation.

Anti-perlecan antibodies and acute humoral rejection in hypersensitized patients without forbidden HLA specificities after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The improvement in the definition of serum anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-Abs) profiles after Luminex-assay implementation in transplant patients follow-up is clear. This success has permitted the development of hypersensitized-recipient allocation and donor-paired exchange programs improving the access to transplantation. However, non-HLA Abs have been described in transplanted patients but their effect in hypersensitized transplanted recipients is unclear.

METHODS

Twenty-seven HLA hypersensitized patients awaiting for kidney transplantation (KT) were studied and 11 of them were followed after KT. The HLA Abs profile was confirmed in serum by Single Antigen Luminex assay and panel reactive of antigens >98% was achieved in all patients. Subsequently, the ability to fix complement by C1q test was also assessed. Serum non-HLA Abs before and 1 month after transplantation were measured in the 11 hypersensitized recipients.

RESULTS

95.2% of the hypersensitized on waiting list had concomitant serum anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs. The more frequent specificity in non-HLA Abs were found against Glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSST-1) (in 62%) and C-terminal fragment of perlecan (LG3) (in 52%). Four out of 11 transplanted patients presented early antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) confirmed by biopsy and had serum anti-LG3 antibodies, two of them with concomitant anti-anti-angiotensin II type I receptor. Only one patient developed de novo-donor specific HLA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of non-HLA antibodies in patients in the waiting list is largely underestimated. The concomitance anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs in hypersensitized patients is very common and the detection of non-HLA Abs in this population could allow to identify patients with an increased risk of humoral rejection.