Post-transplant eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders and lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplant recipients on tacrolimus

Dispersive solid phase extraction of tacrolimus from biological samples using curcumin and iron-based metal organic frameworks nanocomposite followed by LC-MS/MS determination

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in the prevention of tissue rejection. It has a narrow therapeutic index. Therefore, the determination of its concentration in biological fluids like plasma and urine is a very crucial issue. In this research, tacrolimus concentrations in plasma and urine samples were determined with a dispersive solid phase extraction procedure coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. For this purpose, a curcumin modified metal-organic framework was synthesized and used in extraction procedure. Tacrolimus was adsorbed onto the sorbent surface with aid of vortexing. Then, the adsorbed tacrolimus was eluted by a suitable solvent. Important parameters in extraction procedure were optimized by "one-variable-at-a-time" approach and reported as below: sorbent amount, 10 mg; sample solution pH, 2; agitation mode, vortexing; adsorption and desorption times, 1 min, and eluent (volume), methanol (200 µL). Under the optimized conditions and according to the International Council for Harmonization guidelines, the validation of the method was performed, and the results showed acceptable accuracy and precision (relative standard deviations ≤14 %), good linearity in a wide range (4-200 ng mL-1), and low limits of detection (1.2 ng mL-1 in plasma and 0.34 ng mL-1 in urine) and quantification (4.7 ng mL-1 in plasma and 1.12 ng mL-1 in urine). Finally, the validated method was successfully applied for the determination of tacrolimus in the plasma samples of the patients.

A pediatric case series of catastrophic gastrointestinal complications of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease with increasing incidence, high association with coronavirus disease 2019, higher mortality, and a plea for early endoscopy to prevent late fatal outcome

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is one of the most severe complications after transplantation, caused by uncontrolled proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus-positive B-cells in the setting of chronic immunosuppression. As one of the biggest transplant centers worldwide, we observed a potential increase in the number of patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms in 1 year, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There is limited information about dysregulation of the immune system following coronavirus disease 2019 infection, which may lead to Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in Epstein-Barr virus-positive B-cells and development of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Furthermore, there is no consensus in literature on a modality that can help in early diagnosis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder with nonspecific gastrointestinal presentations before late and fatal complications occur.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our case series includes five Iranian (Persian) patients, three female (2, 2.5, and 5 years old) and two male (2 and 2.5 years old), who developed gastrointestinal posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after liver transplantation. All of our patients were on a similar immunosuppressant regimen and had similar Epstein-Barr virus serologic status (seronegative at time of transplantation but seropositive at time of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder diagnosis). Four patients had either a positive coronavirus disease 2019 polymerase chain reaction test or exposure within the family. Although all of our patients presented with nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, four patients developed late posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder complications such as bowel perforation and obstruction. All five patients with gastrointestinal posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder received chemotherapy, but only two survived and currently are continuing the therapy. In one of the surviving patients, prompt endoscopic investigation resulted in early diagnosis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and a better outcome.

CONCLUSION

Since 80% of our patients had exposure to coronavirus, a potential relationship might be suggested between the two. Furthermore, as we witnessed in one case, urgent endoscopic investigation in immunocompromised patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms can improve the clinical outcomes and therefore should be considered for early diagnosis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Two cases of transplant-acquired food allergy who developed resensitization after a negative oral food challenge

BACKGROUND

Cases of food allergy after hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation in previously nonallergic transplant recipients were reported as transplant-acquired food allergy (TAFA), but information about its long-term outcome is still limited. A phenomenon where patients reacquire food allergy by resuming daily consumption after a negative oral food challenge has not yet been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report two cases of TAFA after liver transplantation and cord blood transplantation. In each case, the threshold of daily consumption to cause allergic symptoms decreased when a negative oral food challenge was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases show an importance of gastrointestinal tract as a route of food sensitization because thresholds that caused allergic reactions decreased during their resuming process. We need to be careful with possible resensitization once a negative substantial dose was confirmed.

Late airway complications following pediatric liver transplantation: A case series

BACKGROUND

Late airway complications, as consequence of immunosuppression following pediatric liver transplantation are uncommonly reported.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, we describe two young children presenting with symptoms of airway obstruction, secondary to differing pathologies in the supraglottic airway, as a result of immunosuppression following liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Case 1, a 2-year-old girl who presented with stridor 12-months following liver transplantation, was found to have a proliferative soft tissue mass involving the supraglottic larynx. Biopsies were consistent with infiltrative eosinophilic laryngitis and associated eosinophilic esophagitis. Case 2, a 12-month-old female who presented with stridor 5-months following liver transplantation, was found to have an exophytic soft tissue mass involving the supraglottis and hypopharynx. Biopsies revealed polymorphic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Case 1 was managed with local resection and high dose oral corticosteroids. Case 2 responded to debulking of the necrotic supraglottic mass, reduction of immunosuppression and rituximab.

CONCLUSION

A high index of suspicion needs to be maintained for complications of immunosuppression for appropriate diagnosis of airway presentations following pediatric liver transplantation. Further research is necessary to improve early detection and consolidate management strategies for these airway lesions.

Peanut allergy in an adult following cardiac transplant from a non-atopic donor

We present a 62-year-old woman with severe heart failure and who required cardiac transplantation. On postoperative day 22, she experienced anaphylaxis to peanut, with an elevated peanut-specific immunoglobulin E level. This case highlights the differential diagnosis of posttransplantation anaphylaxis as well as the appropriate evaluation.