Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant?

IL-10 and TGF-β, but Not IL-17A or IFN-γ, Potentiate the IL-15-Induced Proliferation of Human T Cells: Association with a Decrease in the Expression of β2m-Free HLA Class I Molecules Induced by IL-15

IL-15 is a homeostatic cytokine for human T and NK cells. However, whether other cytokines influence the effect of IL-15 is not known. We studied the impact that IL-10, TGF-β, IL-17A, and IFN-γ have on the IL-15-induced proliferation of human T cells and the expression of HLA class I (HLA-I) molecules. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were labeled with CFSE and stimulated for 12 days with IL-15 in the absence or presence of the other cytokines. The proportion of proliferating T cells and the expression of cell surface HLA-I molecules were analyzed using flow cytometry. The IL-15-induced proliferation of T cells was paralleled by an increase in the expression of HC-10-reactive HLA-I molecules, namely on T cells that underwent ≥5-6 cycles of cell division. It is noteworthy that the IL-15-induced proliferation of T cells was potentiated by IL-10 and TGF-β but not by IL-17 or IFN-γ and was associated with a decrease in the expression of HC-10-reactive molecules. The cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β potentiate the proliferative capacity that IL-15 has on human T cells in vitro, an effect that is associated with a reduction in the amount of HC-10 reactive HLA class I molecules induced by IL-15.

Comparison of HLA antibody identification methods for the selection of platelet products for HLA-mediated platelet refractory patients

In an ineffective transfusion context, solid-phase immunoassays using the Luminex platform for the detection and characterization of HLA antibodies are currently used to select HLA-compatible platelet products. A new HLA antibody identification method, the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test (BAG Health care GmbH, Lich, Germany), based on the detection of antibodies directed against a recombinant single antigen (SA) by colored spots detected by HISTO MATCH HLA AB module software, runs fully automated on the MR.SPOT®. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the HISTO SPOT HLA AB and C1qScreen™ (C1q SAB) assays with that of the Labscreen single antigen class I (OL SAB) assay to detect anti-HLA class I antibodies in 56 serum samples from 54 platelet refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients who received HLA mismatch platelet concentrates at a single oncohematology center. In total, 1414 class I specificities, 433 HLA-A and 981 HLA-B, were detected by the OL SAB test. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was >5000 for 874 antigens and <5000 for 655 antigens. The HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB tests identified 85% and 79% of OL SA-detected antigens with an MFI >5000, respectively, but did not identify 34% and 44% of OL SAB-detected antigens, highlighting the lower sensitivity of these techniques. Interestingly, the donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) identified by the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB assays reacted against HLA mismatch platelet concentrates with the same specificity (86%) and positive predictive (77%) value as in the OL SAB test when the MFI threshold was >2000 for DSA detection. Although the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test is less sensitive than the OL SAB test, this test could be used for the selection of HLA-compatible platelet products.

Impact of allele-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen class I antibodies on organ allocation

Technological advances in the field of histocompatibility have allowed us to define anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificity at the allelic level. However, how allele-specific antibodies affect organ allocation is poorly studied. We examined allelic specificities of class I HLA antibodies in 6726 consecutive serum samples from 2953 transplant candidates and evaluated their impact on the corresponding crossmatch and organ allocation. Out of 17 class I HLA antigens represented by >1 allele in the LABScreen single antigen bead assay, 12 had potential allele-specific reactivity. Taking advantage of our unbiased cohort of deceased donor-candidate testing (123,135 complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches between 2014 and 2017), we estimated that the presence of allele-specific antibody detected using a single antigen bead assay (median fluorescence intensity, >3000) against only the rare allele was a poor predictor of a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, with a positive predictive value of 0% to 7%, compared with 52.5% in allele-concordant class I HLA antibodies against A or B locus antigens. Further, we confirmed allele-specific reactivity using flow crossmatch in 3 scenarios: A11:01/A11:02, A68:01/A68:02, and B44:02/B44:03. Our results suggest that allele-specific antibodies may unnecessarily exclude transplant candidates (up to 10%) from organ offers by overcalling unacceptable antigens; incorporation of selective reactivity pattern in allocation may promote precision matching and more equitable allocation.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

Four Faces of Cell-Surface HLA Class-I: Their Antigenic and Immunogenic Divergence Generating Novel Targets for Vaccines

Leukocyte cell-surface HLA-I molecules, involved in antigen presentation of peptides to CD8+ T-cells, consist of a heavy chain (HC) non-covalently linked to β2-microglobulin (β2m) (Face-1). The HC amino acid composition varies across all six isoforms of HLA-I, while that of β2m remains the same. Each HLA-allele differs in one or more amino acid sequences on the HC α1 and α2 helices, while several sequences among the three helices are conserved. HCs without β2m (Face-2) are also observed on human cells activated by malignancy, viral transformation, and cytokine or chemokine-mediated inflammation. In the absence of β2m, the monomeric Face-2 exposes immunogenic cryptic sequences on these cells as confirmed by HLA-I monoclonal antibodies (LA45, L31, TFL-006, and TFL-007). Furthermore, such exposure enables dimerization between two Face-2 molecules by SH-linkage, salt linkage, H-bonding, and van der Waal forces. In HLA-B27, the linkage between two heavy chains with cysteines at position of 67 of the amino acid residues was documented. Similarly, several alleles of HLA-A, B, C, E, F and G express cysteine at 67, 101, and 164, and additionally, HLA-G expresses cysteine at position 42. Thus, the monomeric HC (Face-2) can dimerize with another HC of its own allele, as homodimers (Face-3), or with a different HC-allele, as heterodimers (Face-4). The presence of Face-4 is well documented in HLA-F. The post-translational HLA-variants devoid of β2m may expose several cryptic linear and non-linear conformationally altered sequences to generate novel epitopes. The objective of this review, while unequivocally confirming the post-translational variants of HLA-I, is to highlight the scientific and clinical importance of the four faces of HLA and to prompt further research to elucidate their functions and their interaction with non-HLA molecules during inflammation, infection, malignancy and transplantation. Indeed, these HLA faces may constitute novel targets for passive and active specific immunotherapy and vaccines.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry

Matching strategies based on HLA eplets instead of HLA antigens in solid organ transplantation may not only increase the donor pool for highly sensitized patients, but also decrease the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation. However, since not all eplets are equally capable of inducing an immune response, antibody verification is needed to confirm their ability to be bound by antibodies, such that only clinically relevant eplets are considered. The HLA Epitope Registry has documented all theoretically defined HLA eplets along with their antibody verification status and has been the foundation for many clinical studies investigating eplet mismatch in transplantation. The verification methods for eplets in the Registry range from polyclonal sera from multi- and uni-parous women to murine and human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and antibodies purified by adsorption and elution from sera of HLA immunized individuals. The classification of antibody verification based on different methods for validation is problematic, since not all approaches represent the same level of evidence. In this study, we introduce a classification system to evaluate the level of evidence for the antibody-verified status of all eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry. We demonstrate that for a considerable number of eplets, the antibody-verified status is solely based on polyclonal serum reactivity of multiparous women or on reactivity of murine mAbs. Furthermore, we noted that a substantial proportion of patient sera analyses and human mAb data presented in the HLA Epitope Registry Database has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, we tested several unpublished human HLA-specific mAbs by luminex single antigen beads assay to analyze their HLA reactivity for eplet antibody verification. Although the majority of analyzed mAbs indeed verified their assigned eplets, this was not the case for a number of eplets. This comprehensive overview of evidence for antibody verification of eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry is instrumental for future investigations towards eplet immunogenicity and clinical studies considering antibody-verified eplet mismatch in transplantation and warrants further standardization of antibody verification using high quality data.