Symmetry in nasolabial area of UCCL patients one year after primary lip repair with modified Millard technique

How Deviation of Nasal Septum Affects Nasal Appearance in Unilateral Cleft Patients: A Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

AIM

To quantitatively evaluate the relationship between nasal appearance and nasal septum deviation in unilateral complete cleft patients using cone-beam computed tomography.Method: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 180 patients with unilateral cleft lip/palate from June 2014 to June 2017 were used in the study. None of the subjects had undergone septoplasty. The data were compared between the 2 groups to elucidate the relationship between nasal appearance and deviated nasal septum in unilateral complete cleft patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of a total of 180 patients (126 males and 54 females) was 14.58 years, with a standard deviation of 7.10 years, ranged from 6 years old to 49 years old. Columella nasi symmetry parameters show slight positive significant association with angle of nasal septal deviation on transerve plan (r = 0.250, P < 0.001), TRSD (r = 0.323, P < 0.001) and coronal range of nasal septal deviation (r = 0.294, P < 0.001), and moderate positive significant association with coronal angle about septal deviation (r = 0.404, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Columella nasi symmetry affected by septal deviation, whereas there is lack of evidence to say symmetry of nasal tip and base affected by septal deviation. The symmetry of nasal tip and alar base are not just determined by nasal septum deviation. The nasal septum deviation show difference in different cleft type.

Variational Characteristics of Nasolabial Appearance and Its Influencing Factors for the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair With Modified Huaxi Technique

PURPOSE

After many years in clinical practice, the authors found that the long-term aesthetics of the upper lip and nose following repair of a unilateral cleft lip deformity using the Huaxi method remained unsatisfactory. The immediate postoperative effect was often good, while the long-term postoperative effect was poor. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and influencing factors of a modified Huaxi method for repairing unilateral cleft lip over time, and to explore the relationship between immediate and long-term outcomes after cleft lip surgery.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral cleft lip who visited the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the Stomatological Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from June 2014 to March 2016 were selected. The study group consisted of 51 consecutive patients (30 boys and 21 girls), aged between 3 months and 2 years. Of these, 24 presented with complete unilateral cleft lip (12 wore a nasoalveolar mold as required, 12 did not) and 27 with incomplete unilateral cleft lip (13 wore a nasoalveolar mold as required, 14 did not). Photographs were taken of 51 patients before surgery and immediately, 7 days, and 6 months postoperatively. Various indexes of nasolabial contour of each patient were measured using iWitness photogrammetry, and the slit width; lip height ratio, lip width ratio, nostril width ratio, and nostril height ratio of the healthy side; and degree of deviation of the nasal columella were calculated.

RESULTS

Long-term symmetry of lip height and width remained stable postoperatively (P > 0.05), whereas nostril height symmetry was significantly reduced (P > 0.05). Nasal width symmetry and midpoint deviation of the nasal columella were stable in patients with nasoalveolar molding (P > 0.05), but significantly decreased in patients without nasoalveolar molding (P < 0.05). In patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, there was a significant correlation between fissure width and lip width symmetry 6 months postoperatively (r = 0.431, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The symmetry of the upper lip is satisfactory and stable following surgical repair with the modified Huaxi technique. However, undercorrection of nasal symmetry is commonplace. Fissure width and nasoalveolar molding may influence long-term aesthetics following unilateral cleft lip repair.

Revisiting straight-line repair in unilateral complete cleft lip: a comparison with rotation-advancement repair

Rotation-advancement repair (RAR) has been the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. We recently used a straight-line repair with medial orbicularis muscle lengthening (SLR-ml) technique, based on the hypothesis that it could minimize the postoperative scar appearance without causing s short-lip deformity when muscle reorientation is performed correctly. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on unilateral complete cleft lip patients who underwent cheiloplasty between 2009 and 2017. Two cheiloplasty techniques were compared: RAR and SLR-ml. Outcomes were evaluated by assessing follow-up photographs using three methods: (1) glance impression on a five-point scale, (2) Manchester Scar Scale, and (3) indirect anthropometry. Seventy-one patients were analysed: 41 in the RAR group (28 male, 13 female) and 30 in the SLR-ml group (15 male, 15 female). The glance impression (P=0.506) and Manchester Scar Scale (P=0.347) scores did not differ between the groups. According to the symmetry ratio (cleft side value/non-cleft side value), vertical lip height (P=0.804), horizontal lip length (P=0.881), and Cupid's bow width (P=0.122) did not differ significantly between the groups. The preoperative lip height discrepancy was not correlated with the postoperative vertical lip height. The SLR-ml method can be regarded as a successful tool for symmetric repair of unilateral cleft lip.

Primary Repair in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft of Lip and Primary Palate: Assessment of Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Asymmetry of median facial structures is a major concern for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and the principal goal of its treatment is to restore symmetry. Unilateral complete cleft of lip and primary palate (UCCLPP) is an uncommon subgroup and rarely reported. Patients with UCCLPP have protruding and deviating premaxilla, rendering a primary repair difficult. This study evaluated consecutive patients with UCCLPP and presented their treatment outcome.

METHODS

We assessed 36 patients with UCCLPP and collected clinical information. Surgical repair was performed at 3 months of age by using a modified rotation-advancement method and primary nasal reconstruction. A single surgeon performed all surgical procedures. A postoperative nasal stent was used for 6 months. Follow-up standardized photographs were collected. Landmarks were identified, and nose and lip dimensions measured. The ratios of the corresponding parameters (cleft vs noncleft side) were obtained for evaluating nose and lip symmetry.

RESULTS

No surgical complication was noted in any patient. The overall lip and nose outcome after the primary repair were adequate, and all ratios were close to 1. The nostril width was slightly wider on the cleft side, but the alar width and height were acceptable. The lip heights were balanced between the 2 sides. Patients who received presurgical nasoalveolar molding did not show more favorable lip and nose dimensions, except for the medial philtral height.

CONCLUSION

Even in the presence of protruding and deviating premaxilla, our patients with UCCLPP obtained adequate lip and nose outcome after undergoing primary lip repair and nasal reconstruction.

The Changing Nasolabial Dimensions following Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip: An Anthropometric Study in Late Childhood

BACKGROUND

Repair of unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity in three dimensions requires anticipation of changes in the fourth dimension that can be determined by periodic and objective assessment.

METHODS

Fifty patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate underwent primary repair from 1999 to 2004 and were followed through 2014. Anthropometry was performed immediately postoperatively and at a first and second follow-up interval, occurring at an average age of 6.6 and 11.5 years, respectively. Measured differences between cleft and noncleft sides included heminasal width (subnasale-alare), cutaneous labial height (subnasale-crista philtri inferior, subalare-crista philtri inferior), and transverse labial width at the cutaneous-vermilion border (crista philtri inferior-chelion). Contrasts for the rates of growth were assessed with t tests for correlated measures. Using the same method, the difference between growth on cleft and noncleft sides in the second period was compared to that in the first period.

RESULTS

Heminasal width remained narrower on the cleft side, but this difference decreased over time. Subnasale-crista philtri inferior remained longer on the cleft side; there was no difference between the rate of growth on the cleft and noncleft sides in the second period. Subalare-crista philtri inferior remained shorter on the cleft side by a consistent difference at both times of follow-up measurements. Transverse labial width at the cutaneous-vermilion border remained shorter on the cleft side, but this difference decreased in the second period.

CONCLUSION

Understanding how nasolabial features change with growth is critical to crafting the initial repair of unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Variation trends of the postoperative outcomes for unilateral cleft lip patients by modified Mohler and Tennison-Randall cheiloplasties

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative variation trends of unilateral cleft lip by stages, and to analyze influential factors of nasolabial symmetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 145 patients with unilateral cleft lip were treated by the modified Mohler or Tennison-Randall technique, and received routine anti-scarring treatment postoperatively. Photogrammetry was applied to respectively measure 5 indices by stages preoperatively, the first week (1 w), the third month (3 m), the sixth month (6 m), and the first year (1 y) postoperatively. Then we calculated the symmetry ratio and drew line charts. Student t tests were used for any group differences; linear regression analysis was used to examine which postoperative stage correlated best with the preoperative stage; cluster analysis was used to classify the severity of the cleft according to preoperative SRsn-cphi, which was used to predict the operative difficulty and to select an appropriate technique.

RESULTS

The Mohler technique yielded a more symmetric result. With the Tennison-Randall technique, the alar base was more lateral and downward, and the lip height on cleft side seemed longer. A stable effect emerged around 1 year after surgery with both techniques. Conspicuous scars appeared at 3 months, most scars gradually fade at 6 months, and the total evolution took around 1 year. Scars from the Mohler technique fluctuated across a larger range. Preoperative SRsn-cphi of the two techniques had statistical significance and was adopted as the basis for cluster analysis. The critical value was 0.670. The Mohler technique attained an almost identical effect in each interval, whereas the Tennison-Randall technique was better in the interval that SRsn-cphi <0.670.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SRsn-cphi can be the evaluation index of severity; the modified Mohler technique is more broadly applicable to differences in severity than is the Tennison-Randall technique.