Sirolimus and everolimus: inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin in liver transplantation

mTOR–mLST8 interaction: hot spot identification through quantum biochemistry calculations

Quantum calculation of mTOR–mLST8 interaction.

Conversion From Calcineurin to Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) is often used in liver transplantation to overcome calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity but the evidence base for this approach is not well defined. To summarize the evidence, from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), for conversion from CNI to mTORi-based immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Databases and conference abstracts were searched up to August 2015. The RCTs evaluating conversion from CNI to mTORi-based maintenance immunosuppression after adult liver transplantation. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted; summary mean difference and risk ratio (RR) estimates were synthesized under a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs, with a total of 1927 patients, met the final inclusion criteria. Patients converted to mTORi had significantly better renal function at 1 year after randomization compared with patients remaining on CNI (mean difference, 7.48 mL/min per 1.73 m; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.18-11.8). The risks of graft loss (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-2.09; I, 31%) and patient death (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.63-1.73; I, 0%) were similar for patients converted to mTORi and patients remaining on CNI. However, conversion to mTORi was associated with a higher risk of acute rejection (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.34; I, 0%) and study discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.38-3.44; I, 63%) up to 1 year after randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from CNI to mTORi after liver transplantation is associated with improved renal function after 1 year but increases the risk of acute rejection and may be poorly tolerated.

Immunosuppressants: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in surgical techniques and combinations of conventional immunosuppressants have made paediatric liver transplantation the success story it is today. However, the increasing numbers of survivors reaching adulthood highlight important issues of long-term quality of life and drug induced complications. The aim of this review is to describe the trends and advances in immunosuppression for paediatric liver transplantation over the last 12 months.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

As our knowledge of the immune cell populations and intracellular mechanisms involved in alloreactivity improves, induction immunosuppression has emerged as a powerful therapeutic manoeuvre to counter the initial alloimmune response. Many centres have adopted a more focused use of biological agents at induction to improve immunosuppression in the critical peritransplant period and to reduce the level of subsequent maintenance requirements. Corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitors minimization trials have obtained encouraging results. New immunosuppressive strategies have evolved towards the goal of inducing operational tolerance, and paediatric liver transplant recipients seem to be a particularly promising target. New strategies are being developed also to improve quality of life and reduce nonadherence in adolescents and young adults who underwent liver transplantation. New drugs target B-cell and complement driven rejection and new monoclonal antibodies and small molecules are under trial to inhibit specific signals in the immune response.

SUMMARY

We review current trends of immunosuppressive protocols in paediatric liver transplantation, focusing on induction agents, corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor sparing protocols, protocols for adult transition and new drugs currently under development.