Intraoperative management of liver transplant patients

A Review of the Risk Factors and Approaches to Prevention of Post-Reperfusion Syndrome During Liver Transplantation

Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) is a severe and highly lethal syndrome that occurs after declamping the portal vein forceps during liver transplantation. It is marked by severe hemodynamic disturbances manifested by decreased mean arterial pressure, increased heart rate and elevated pulmonary artery pressure. The complex pathogenesis of PRS remains understudied. It is generally believed to be related to the large amount of acidic, cold blood that enters the circulation after release of the portal clamp. This blood is rich in oxygen-free radicals and metabolic toxins, which not only aggravate the ischemia-reperfusion injury of the liver but also further attack the systemic organs indiscriminately. Considering the range of possible adverse prognoses including acute kidney injury, delirium and graft nonfunction, it is imperative that clinicians increase their awareness and prevention of PRS. The aim of this article is to review the current risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms and prevention strategies for PRS.

Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe some components of the perioperative practice in liver transplantation as reported by clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional clinical practice survey using an online instrument containing questions on selected themes related to the perioperative care of liver transplant recipients. We sent email invitations to Canadian anesthesiologists, Canadian surgeons, and French anesthesiologists specialized in liver transplantation. We used five-point Likert-type scales (from "never" to "always") and numerical or categorical answers. Results are presented as medians or proportions.

RESULTS

We obtained answers from 130 participants (estimated response rate of 71% in Canada and 26% in France). Respondents reported rarely using transesophageal echocardiography routinely but often using it for hemodynamic instability, often using an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management strategy, and never using a phlebotomy (medians from ordinal scales). Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported using a restrictive fluid management strategy to manage hemodynamic instability during the dissection phase. Forty-two percent and 15% of respondents reported using viscoelastic tests to guide intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, respectively. Fifty-four percent of respondents reported not pre-emptively treating preoperative coagulations disturbances, and 91% reported treating them intraoperatively only when bleeding was significant. Most respondents (48-64%) did not have an opinion on the maximal graft ischemic times. Forty-seven percent of respondents reported that a piggyback technique was the preferred vena cava anastomosis approach.

CONCLUSION

Different interventions were reported to be used regarding most components of perioperative care in liver transplantation. Our results suggest that significant equipoise exists on the optimal perioperative management of this population.

Validation of McCluskey Index for Massive Blood Transfusion Prediction in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The McCluskey index has been used as a tool to predict massive bleeding (>6 red blood cells units) during orthotropic liver transplantation. The objective of this study is to verify its efficacy at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 1998 and December 2017, we performed 1216 orthotropic liver transplantations, of which 1016 had sufficient data registered with respect to hemoderivative transfusion. We divided these patients into groups based on the original study of McCluskey. This study was approved by the ethical committee of our Institution and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score in the 4 groups was 7.5 (range, 7-8) for low risk; 13 (range, 3-32) for medium risk, 17 (range, 8-41) for high risk, and 25 (range, 11-36) for very high risk (P < .001). No significant differences were observed regarding body mass index or hospital stay. No differences have been found in the number of suboptimal donors among the groups. With respect to hemoderivative transfusions, we observed the following for red blood cells: 7 (range, 6-8) units for low risk; 5.5 (range, 0-74) for medium risk; 7 (range, 0-73) for high risk, and 12 (range, 5-30) for very high risk (P < .001) and transfusion of plasma: 12 (range, 10-15) units for low risk; 11 (range, 0-89) for medium risk; 14 (range, 0-76) for high risk, and 13 (range, 3-30) for very high risk (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The McCluskey index is a good indicator of the risk of hemorrhage and hence the necessity of transfusion.

Correlation of Deceased Donor Factors to Postreperfusion Severe Hyperglycemia in Adult Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

In this study, our objective was to identify perioperative factors associated with postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia, with a particular focus on deceased donor factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Perioperative data from 100 patients without diabetes who were undergoing liver transplant from deceased donors were reviewed. Mean blood glucose levels were calculated at each liver transplant surgical phase, with a cutoff level of 12.7 mmol/L (230 mg/dL) during the neo-hepatic phase defined as postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia. Patients were divided into those with and without postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia. Selected perioperative variables were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 55 developed postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia. Among donor variables, a statistically significant difference between groups was only shown for graft-to-recipient liver weight ratio (P < .001). With regard to preoperative recipient variables, the 2 groups showed a significant difference in mean age (P = .001). Patients in the postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia group required significantly more packed red blood cell transfusions (P = .002), sodium bicarbonate (P = .054), and vasopressors (P = .002) during the operation. Moreover, in terms of laboratory findings, although the last arterial pH was acceptable in both groups, a last lower arterial pH was observed in patients with postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia (P = .011). Higher mean blood glucose levels were detected in the postre - perfusion hyperglycemia group during the preanhepatic and anhepatic phases (P = .024, P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing liver transplant, incidence of postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia was influenced by graft-to-recipient liver weight ratio. Furthermore, postreperfusion severe hyperglycemia was associated with intraoperative clinical and laboratory disturbances in liver transplant recipients.

Potassium levels after liver reperfusion in adult patients undergoing cadaveric liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Hyperkalemia is a common cause of arrhythmias in patients undergoing liver transplantation. We examined the pattern of change of potassium levels during and immediately after reperfusion of the donor liver.

Materials and methods

Potassium levels of 30 consecutive adult patients undergoing cadaveric liver transplantation were assessed before and after liver reperfusion. Changes in potassium levels over 13 predefined timepoints were analyzed. Primary aim: to describe the pattern of change of potassium levels during the reperfusion period. Correlation between changes in potassium levels during reperfusion and a-priori variables were investigated.

Results

Baseline median (IQR) potassium levels were 4.1 (3.8:4.5) mmol/L. Thirteen patients (43%) developed hyperkalemia, 10 (33%) of whom developed severe hyperkalemia. Potassium levels peaked at 80 s post reperfusion, plateaued until 2 min, before returning toward baseline values at 5 min. There was a strong association between pre-reperfusion/baseline potassium levels and peak potassium values during reperfusion (95%CI: 0.26 to 0.77, p < 0.001). A baseline potassium level of 4.45 mmol/L was a good predictor of reperfusion hyperkalemia with a sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 94.1% (AUC = 0.894, 95%CI: 0.779 to 1.000, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Hyperkalemia during cadaveric liver transplantation is common affecting almost 1 in 2 patients during reperfusion. During reperfusion potassium levels peaked within 2 min and over a third of patients developed severe hyperkalemia. Higher peak potassium levels correlated strongly with higher pre-reperfusion potassium values. These findings guide clinicians with timing of sampling of blood to check for hyperkalemia and identify modifiable factors associated with the development of hyperkalemia.

•

Hyperkalemia during the reperfusion phase of cadaveric liver transplantation is common.

•

Potassium levels peaked at 80 s post reperfusion, plateaued for 2 min, and returned to baseline at 5 min.

•

There was a strong association between pre-reperfusion potassium levels and peak potassium values during reperfusion.

•

Timing of blood sampling to check for hyperkalemia is paramount.

•

A baseline potassium level of greater than 4.45 mmol/L was a good predictor of reperfusion hyperkalemia.

[Anesthesiological aspects of liver transplantation]

Liver transplantation (LTPL) is the only curative option for patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) or with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eurotransplant in Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for organ allocation. The model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score, which describes the severity of the liver disease, is decisive for organ allocation. The heterogeneous patient collective and hepatic-related comorbidities and their dynamics represent challenges. The anesthesiologist is responsible for evaluating the overall prognosis, whereby cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neurological comorbidities must be taken into consideration. During LTPL surgery is divided into several stages. Besides volume management, heat preservation and coagulation management, major challenges for the anesthesiologist are hemodynamic stabilization and regulation of the acid-base balance.

Development of a Predictive Model for Hyperglycemia in Nondiabetic Recipients After Liver Transplantation

Background

Posttransplant hyperglycemia has been associated with increased risks of transplant rejection, infections, length of stay, and mortality.

Methods

To establish a predictive model to identify nondiabetic recipients at risk for developing postliver transplant (LT) hyperglycemia, we performed this secondary, retrospective data analysis of a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of glycemic control among 107 adult LT recipients in the inpatient period. Hyperglycemia was defined as a posttransplant glucose level greater than 200 mg/dL after initial discharge up to 1 month following surgery. Candidate variables with P less than 0.10 in univariate analyses were used to build a multivariable logistic regression model using forward stepwise selection. The final model chosen was based on statistical significance and additive contribution to the model based on the Bayesian Information Criteria.

Results

Forty-three (40.2%) patients had at least 1 episode of hyperglycemia after transplant after the resolution of the initial postoperative hyperglycemia. Variables selected for inclusion in the model (using model optimization strategies) included length of hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; P < 0.001), use of glucose-lowering medications at discharge (OR, 3.76; P = 0.03), donor female sex (OR, 3.18; P = 0.02) and donor white race (OR, 3.62; P = 0.01). The model had good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test statistic = 9.74, P = 0.28) and discrimination (C-statistic = 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.81, bias-corrected C-statistic = 0.78).

Conclusions

Shorter hospital stay, use of glucose-lowering medications at discharge, donor female sex and donor white race are important determinants in predicting hyperglycemia in nondiabetic recipients after hospital discharge up to 1 month after liver transplantation.

Prediction of postoperative outcomes using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data

Major surgeries can result in high rates of adverse postoperative events. Reliable prediction of which patient might be at risk for such events may help guide peri- and postoperative care. We show how archiving and mining of intraoperative hemodynamic data in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can aid in the prediction of postoperative 180-day mortality and acute renal failure (ARF), improving upon predictions that rely on preoperative information only. From 101 patient records, we extracted 15 preoperative features from clinical records and 41 features from intraoperative hemodynamic signals. We used logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation to predict outcomes, and incorporated methods to limit potential model instabilities from feature multicollinearity. Using only preoperative features, mortality prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44–0.78). By using intraoperative features, performance improved significantly to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.56–0.91, P = 0.001). Similarly, including intraoperative features (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66–0.94) in ARF prediction improved performance over preoperative features (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50–0.85), though not significantly (P = 0.32). We conclude that inclusion of intraoperative hemodynamic features significantly improves prediction of postoperative events in OLT. Features strongly associated with occurrence of both outcomes included greater intraoperative central venous pressure and greater transfusion volumes.

Perioperative Care of the Liver Transplant Patient

With the evolution of surgical and anesthetic techniques, liver transplantation has become "routine," allowing for modifications of practice to decrease perioperative complications and costs. There is debate over the necessity for intensive care unit admission for patients with satisfactory preoperative status and a smooth intraoperative course. Postoperative care is made easier when the liver graft performs optimally. Assessment of graft function, vigilance for complications after the major surgical insult, and optimization of multiple systems affected by liver disease are essential aspects of postoperative care. The intensivist plays a vital role in an integrated multidisciplinary transplant team.

Temporary abdominal closure and delayed biliary reconstruction due to massive bleeding in patients undergoing liver transplantation: an old trick in a new indication

Background

Massive bleeding during liver transplantation (LT) is difficult to manage surgical event. Perihepatic packing (PP) and temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with delayed biliary reconstruction (DBR) can be applied in these circumstances.

Method

A prospective database of LT in a major transplant center was analyzed to identify patients with massive uncontrollable bleeding during LT that was resolved by PP, TAC, and DBR.

Results

From January 2009 to July 2013, 20 (3.6%) of 547 patients who underwent LT underwent DBR. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 20,500 ml at the first operation. The DBR was performed with a mean of 55.2 h (16–110) after LT. Biliary reconstruction included duct‐to‐duct (n = 9) and hepatico‐jejunostomy (n = 11). Complications occurred in eight patients and included portal vein thrombosis, cholangitis, severe bacteremia, pneumonia. There was one in‐hospital death. In the follow‐up of 18 to 33 months we have seen one patient died 9 months after transplantation. The remaining 18 patients are alive and well.

Conclusions

In case of massive uncontrollable bleeding and bowel edema during LT, the combined procedures of PP, TAC, and DBR offer an alternatively surgical option to solve the tough situation.

Intraoperative hemodynamics predict postoperative mortality in orthotopic liver transplantation

Liver transplantation remains the only curative treatment option for a variety of end-stage liver diseases. Prediction of major adverse events following surgery has traditionally focused on static predictors that are known prior to surgery. The effects of intraoperative management can now be explored due to the archiving of high-resolution monitoring data. We extracted intraoperative hemodynamic trend data of 55 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and computed 12 features from the systolic arterial blood pressure (ABP), cardiac index, central venous pressure (CVP), and stroke volume variation (SVV) signals. Using a logistic regression classifier with a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure, we selected subsets of these features to predict mortality up to 180 days after surgery. Best performance was achieved with a combination of 3 features - median absolute deviation (MAD) of ABP, median CVP, and time spent with SVV <; 10% - reaching an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (or c-statistic) of 0.808. Odds ratios (OR) computed from the coefficients of the multivariate logistic regression model constructed from these features showed that greater time spent with SVV <; 10% (OR = 0.981 min(-1), p = 0.001) and greater MAD of systolic ABP (OR = 0.696 mmHg(-1), p = 0.026) were significantly associated with survival. Adding preoperative measures such as age and serum concentrations of albumin, bilirubin, and creatinine failed to improve performance of the prediction model. These results show that the course of intraoperative hemodynamics can predict 180-day mortality after OLT.

Critical Care of the Liver Transplant Recipient

Patient survival following orthotopic liver transplantation has greatly increased following improvements in surgical technique, anesthetic care, and immunosuppression. The critical care of the liver transplant recipient has paralleled these improvements, largely thanks to input from multidisciplinary teams and institution-specific protocols guiding management and care. This article provides an overview of the approach to critical care of the postoperative adult liver transplant recipient outlining common issues faced by the intensivist. Approaches to extubation and hemodynamic assessment are described. The provision of appropriate immunosuppression, infection prophylaxis, and nutrition is addressed. To aid prompt diagnosis and treatment, intensivists must be aware of postoperative complications of bleeding, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, vascular thromboses, biliary complications, rejection, and organ dysfunction.

Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation

As surgical and graft preservation techniques have improved and immunosuppressive drugs have advanced, liver transplantation (LT) is now considered the gold standard for treating patients with end-stage liver disease worldwide. However, despite the improved survival following LT, severe hemodynamic disturbances during LT remain a serious issue for the anesthesiologist. The greatest hemodynamic disturbance is postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), which occurs at reperfusion of the donated liver after unclamping of the portal vein. PRS is characterized by marked decreases in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance, and moderate increases in pulmonary arterial pressure and central venous pressure. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of PRS are complex. Moreover, risk factors associated with PRS are not fully understood. Rapid and appropriate treatment with vasopressors, volume replacement, or venesection must be provided depending on the cause of the hemodynamic disturbance when hemodynamic instability becomes profound after reperfusion. The negative effects of PRS on postoperative early morbidity and mortality are clear, but the effect of PRS on postoperative long-term mortality remains a matter of debate.

Perioperative predictors for refractory hyperglycemia during the neohepatic phase of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia in the neohepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT) tends to decrease toward completion of the surgical procedure. Refractory hyperglycemia in the neohepatic phase (RH) is influenced by multiple perioperative factors and may be connected to posttransplant outcomes. We attempted to demonstrate the relationship of RH to posttransplant outcomes and to establish a predictive model for RH in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Perioperative data of 211 patients who underwent LDLT from 2009 and 2012 were reviewed, including declines in the blood glucose levels during the neohepatic phase. Perioperative variables including the posttransplant model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score until day 30 were compared between patients with normal declines in blood glucose and patients with RH. Selected variables after intergroup comparisons were examined by means of multivariate logistic regression to establish a predictive model for RH occurrence.

RESULTS

The mean blood glucose decline was 22.3 ± 31.5 mg/dL during the neohepatic phase, and 84 of 203 patients (41.4%) had no decline in blood glucose. In intergroup comparisons, preoperative factors associated with RH included sex, Child-Pugh-Turcotte class, MELD score, emergency, liver enzymes, and graft-to-recipient weight ratio. During surgery, surgical time, serum lactate, and arterial pH were associated with RH. After surgery, the RH group showed slower recovery of the MELD score (15.2 versus 11.9 days) and higher MELD scores until day 10 (P < .05). After the multivariate analysis, recipient sex, emergency, surgical time (≤9 h), and the final intraoperative serum lactate level (≥5.0 mmol/L) were included in the predictive model for RH.

CONCLUSIONS

RH was associated with delayed functional recovery of the liver graft in LT. Recipient sex, emergency, surgical time, and the final intraoperative serum lactate level were identified as predictors of RH. Close monitoring of intraoperative blood glucose in LDLT may be an early prognostic indicator.

Predictive roles of intraoperative blood glucose for post-transplant outcomes in liver transplantation

Diabetogenic traits in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) are exacerbated intraoperatively by exogenous causes, such as surgical stress, steroids, blood transfusions, and catecholamines, which lead to intraoperative hyperglycemia. In contrast to the strict glucose control performed in the intensive care unit, no systematic protocol has been developed for glucose management during LT. Intraoperative blood glucose concentrations typically exceed 200 mg/dL in LT, and extreme hyperglycemia (> 300 mg/dL) is common during the neohepatic phase. Only a few retrospective studies have examined the relationship between intraoperative hyperglycemia and post-transplant complications, with reports of infectious complications or mortality. However, no prospective studies have been conducted regarding the influence of intraoperative hyperglycemia in LT on post-transplant outcome. In addition to absolute blood glucose values, the temporal patterns in blood glucose levels during LT may serve as prognostic features. Persistent neohepatic hyperglycemia (without a decline) throughout LT is a useful indicator of early graft dysfunction. Moreover, intraoperative variability in glucose levels may predict the need for reoperation for hemorrhage after LT. Thus, there is an urgent need for guidelines for glucose control in these patients, as well as prospective studies on the impact of glucose control on various post-transplant complications. This report highlights some of the recent studies related to perioperative blood glucose management focused on LT and liver disease.

Blood glucose regulation during living-donor liver transplant surgery

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to compare the effects of 2 different regimens on blood glucose levels of living-donor liver transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants were randomly allocated to the dextrose in water plus insulin infusion group (group 1, n = 60) or the dextrose in water infusion group (group 2, n = 60) using a sealed envelope technique. Blood glucose levels were measured 3 times during each phase. When the blood glucose level of a patient exceeded the target level, extra insulin was administered via a different intravenous route. The following patient and procedural characteristics were recorded: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, end-stage liver disease, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, total anesthesia time, total surgical time, and number of patients who received an extra bolus of insulin. The following laboratory data were measured pre- and postoperatively: hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, potassium, creatinine, total bilirubin, and albumin.

RESULTS

No hypoglycemia was noted. The recipients exhibited statistically significant differences in blood glucose levels during the dissection and neohepatic phases. Blood glucose levels at every time point were significantly different compared with the first dissection time point in group 1. Excluding the first and second anhepatic time points, blood glucose levels were significantly different as compared with the first dissection time point in group 2 (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that dextrose with water infusion alone may be more effective and result in safer blood glucose levels as compared with dextrose with water plus insulin infusion for living-donor liver transplant recipients. Exogenous continuous insulin administration may induce hyperglycemic attacks, especially during the neohepatic phase of living-donor liver transplant surgery. Further prospective studies that include homogeneous patient subgroups and diabetic recipients are needed to support the use of dextrose plus water infusion without insulin.

Blood transfusion practices in liver transplantation

Blood loss and blood transfusion have been inherently associated with liver transplantation. Bleeding has been attributed to the various factors which are associated with chronic liver dysfunction. Various surgical and anaesthetic strategies have been developed over the years to reduce bleeding and also to optimise the usage of various blood and blood products perioperatively. The present day success of liver transplantation can be attributed to these issues where transfusion practices have changed. Although several centres are successfully performing liver transplantations in large numbers, there is still a large variability in the usage of blood and blood products perioperatively among the institutions and even among different anaesthesiologists from the same institution. The present article deals with the various factors confounding this concept of blood transfusion practices and the various strategies adopted to reduce the transfusion requirements in the perioperative period.

Blood loss, predictors of bleeding, transfusion practice and strategies of blood cell salvaging during liver transplantation

Blood loss during liver transplantation (OLTx) is a common consequence of pre-existing abnormalities of the hemostatic system, portal hypertension with multiple collateral vessels, portal vein thrombosis, previous abdominal surgery, splenomegaly, and poor “functional” recovery of the new liver. The intrinsic coagulopathic features of end stage cirrhosis along with surgical technical difficulties make transfusion-free liver transplantation a major challenge, and, despite the improvements in understanding of intraoperative coagulation profiles and strategies to control blood loss, the requirements for blood or blood products remains high. The impact of blood transfusion has been shown to be significant and independent of other well-known predictors of posttransplant-outcome. Negative effects on immunomodulation and an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality have been repeatedly demonstrated. Isovolemic hemodilution, the extensive utilization of thromboelastogram and the use of autotransfusion devices are among the commonly adopted procedures to limit the amount of blood transfusion. The use of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous blood transfusion should still be considered an important method to reduce the need for allogenic blood and the associated complications. In this article we report on the common preoperative and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss, intraoperative transfusion practices, anesthesiologic and surgical strategies to prevent blood loss, and on intraoperative blood salvaging techniques and autologous blood transfusion. Even though the advances in surgical technique and anesthetic management, as well as a better understanding of the risk factors, have resulted in a steady decrease in intraoperative bleeding, most patients still bleed extensively. Blood transfusion therapy is still a critical feature during OLTx and various studies have shown a large variability in the use of blood products among different centers and even among individual anesthesiologists within the same center. Unfortunately, despite the large number of OLTx performed each year, there is still paucity of large randomized, multicentre, and controlled studies which indicate how to prevent bleeding, the transfusion needs and thresholds, and the “evidence based” perioperative strategies to reduce the amount of transfusion.

Liver transplantation: Advances and perioperative care

Liver transplantation is one of the treatments for many-life threatening liver diseases. Numerous advances in liver transplant surgery, anaesthesia and perioperative care have allowed for an increasing number of these procedures. The purpose of this review is to consider some of the important advances in perioperative care of liver transplant patients such as pre-operative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring and management and early extubation. A PubMed and EMBASE search of terms “Anaesthesia” and “Liver Transplantation” were performed with filters of articles in “English”, “Adult” and relevant recent publications of randomised control trial, editorial, systemic review and non-systemic review were selected and synthesized according to the author's personal and professional perspective in the field of liver transplantation and anaesthesia. The article outlines strategies in organ preservation, training and transplant database for further research.