Clinical value of non-HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation: Still an enigma?

Torque Teno Virus Loads as a Marker of Immunosuppression in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Long-term renal function and survival after kidney transplantation rely on appropriate immunosuppressive treatment to prevent the risk of rejection. New biomarkers are needed to accurately assess the degree of immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients in order to avoid organ rejection and the development of opportunistic infections. Highly prevalent in humans, torque teno virus (TTV), which belongs to the family Anelloviridae, is a small, nonenveloped, single-stranded DNA virus which has not been linked with any specific human illness, but which constitutes a major component of the human virome. Host antiviral responses allow TTV levels to be controlled; however, viral persistence remains, explaining the high prevalence in human populations, including healthy individuals. Important confounders of TTV load include time since transplantation, age, gender, obesity, and smoking status.

AIMS

TTV-based guidance of immunosuppressive drug dosing could help with risk stratification, reducing the risk of infection, graft rejection and oncologic disease on an individual level, enabling long-term patient and graft survival.

METHODS

Original studies were accessed by a systematic search from electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect and Wiley Online Library.

RESULTS

The presented data mainly derive from adult transplant recipients showing an association between TTV plasma levels and the immune status of the host: High-TTV load and high immunosuppression are associated with a risk of infection, and low-TTV load and low immunosuppression indicate a risk of rejection. However, there is minimal information on pediatric transplant recipients with further research required in this cohort. To date, it has been demonstrated that longer posttransplant times are significantly associated with lower TTV levels in children with renal transplant. Meanwhile, an association between lower TTV loads and increased risk of graft reject during the first year of transplantation was also reported. More recently, Eibensteiner et al. revealed a robust, independent association between TTV plasma load and the onset of Cytomegalovirus and BK virus infections.

CONCLUSION

Data from randomized controlled trials are still missing, even in adults, but a multicenter randomized controlled trial for TTV-guided immunosuppression in adult kidney recipients (TTVguideIT) began in 2022. There is, therefore, great promise for TTV levels to be used as a biomarker that could potentially improve both graft and patient survival in transplantation.

Multiomic profiling of transplant glomerulopathy reveals a novel T-cell dominant subclass

Kidney transplant (KTx) biopsies showing transplant glomerulopathy (TG) (glomerular basement membrane double contours (cg) > 0) and microvascular inflammation (MVI) in the absence of C4d staining and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) do not fulfill the criteria for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CA-AMR) diagnosis and do not fit into any other Banff category. To investigate this, we initiated a multicenter intercontinental study encompassing 36 cases, comparing the immunomic and transcriptomic profiles of 14 KTx biopsies classified as cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- with 22 classified as CA-AMR DSA+/C4d+ through novel transcriptomic analysis using the NanoString Banff-Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel and subsequent orthogonal subset analysis using two innovative 5-marker multiplex immunofluorescent panels. Nineteen genes were differentially expressed between the two study groups. Samples diagnosed with CA-AMR DSA+/C4d+ showed a higher glomerular abundance of natural killer cells and higher transcriptomic cell type scores for macrophages in an environment characterized by increased expression of complement-related genes (i.e., C5AR1) and higher activity of angiogenesis, interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy, CA-AMR, and DSA-related pathways when compared to samples diagnosed with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d-. Samples diagnosed with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- displayed a higher glomerular abundance and activity of T cells (CD3+, CD3+CD8+, and CD3+CD8-). Thus, we show that using novel multiomic techniques, KTx biopsies with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- have a prominent T-cell presence and activity, putting forward the possibility that these represent a more T-cell dominant phenotype.

Anti-GSTT1 antibodies and Null genotype correlate with histological changes of antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of anti-Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) antibodies (abs) has been hypothesized as a pathogenic contributor in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between genetic variants of GSTT1, anti-GSTT1 abs and AMR in a cohort of 87 kidney transplant (KTx) patients using Immucor's non-HLA Luminex assay. Patients were classified according to biopsy-proven AMR and HLA-DSA status: AMR with positive anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA+, n = 29), AMR but no detectable anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA-, n = 28) and control patients with stable allograft function and no evidence of rejection (n = 30).

RESULTS

At an MFI cut-off of 3000, the overall prevalence of anti-GSTT1 abs was 18.3%. The proportion of patients with anti-GSTT1 abs was higher in the AMR/DSA- group (25%), compared to the control (13.3%) and AMR/DSA+ group (3.4%) (p = 0.06). Among patients with anti-GSTT1 abs, the MFI was higher in AMR/DSA- and GSTT1-Null patients. Of 81 patients who underwent GSTT1 genotyping, 19.8% were homozygotes for the null allele (GSTT1-Null). GSTT1-Null status in the transplant recipients was associated with the development of anti-GSTT1 abs (OR, 4.49; 95%CI, 1.2-16.7). In addition, GSTT1-Null genotype (OR 26.01; 95%CI, 1.63-404) and anti-GSTT1 ab positivity (OR 14.8; 95%CI, 1.1-190) were associated with AMR. Within AMR/DSA- patients, the presence of anti-GSTT1 abs didn't confer a higher risk of failure within the study observation period.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-GSTT1 abs and GSTT1-Null genotype is associated with AMR, but do not appear to lead to accelerated graft injury in this cohort of early allograft injury changes, with a limited period of follow-up.

Autoantibodies against DNA topoisomerase I promote renal allograft rejection by increasing alloreactive T cell responses

Antibodies reactive to self-antigens are an important component of posttransplant immune responses. The generation requirements and functions of autoantibodies, as well as the mechanisms of their influence on alloimmune responses, still remain to be determined. Our study investigated the contribution of autoimmunity during rejection of renal allografts. We have previously characterized a mouse model in which the acute rejection of a life-supporting kidney allograft is mediated by antibodies. At rejection, recipient sera screening against >4000 potential autoantigens revealed DNA topoisomerase I peptide 205-219 (TI-I205-219) as the most prominent epitope. Subsequent analysis showed TI-I205-219-reactive autoantibodies are induced in nonsensitized recipients of major histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidney allografts in a T cell-dependent manner. Immunization with TI-I205-219 broke self-tolerance, elicited TI-I205-219 immunoglobin G autoantibodies, and resulted in acute rejection of allogeneic but not syngeneic renal transplants. The graft loss was associated with increased priming of donor-reactive T cells but not with donor-specific alloantibodies elevation. Similarly, passive transfer of anti-TI-I205-219 sera following transplantation increased donor-reactive T cell activation with minimal effects on donor-specific alloantibody levels. The results identify DNA topoisomerase I as a novel self-antigen in transplant settings and demonstrate that autoantibodies enhance activation of donor-reactive T cells following renal transplantation.

Levels of angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies correlate with antibody-mediated rejection and poor graft function in kidney-transplantation patients

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and endothelin-1 type-A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Ab) are non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that can elicit adverse effects on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. We investigated the correlation between levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab and postoperative outcomes in KT recipients.

METHODS

Pre-KT and post-KT serum from 79 patients was collected. Post-KT serum was collected within 1 year after KT or simultaneously as the biopsy. Levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. AT1R-Ab >17.0 U/mL and ETAR-Ab >10.0 U/mL was considered to denote positivity according to manufacturer recommendations. We measured donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) levels using LABScreen™ single-antigen kits.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (54 men, 25 women) formed the study cohort. Seven (8.7%) patients were positive for AT1R-Ab, 25 (31.6%) patients were positive for both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab, and 47 (59.5%) were negative for both antibodies at all time points. No patients died during the study period. Patients with both AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab were associated with a higher prevalence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, but not allograft loss or delayed graft function. AT1R-Ab were associated with T-cell-mediated rejection, but the association was not significant. HLA-DSA were associated significantly with a higher creatinine level in serum at 12 months and 24 months in patients with AT1R-Ab and/or ETAR-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1R-Ab, ETAR-Ab, and HLA-DSA were associated with a higher prevalence of AMR and decline in graft function. Measurement of levels of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab in KT patients may be useful for stratification of immunological risk and identification of patients at a high risk of adverse graft outcome.

Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Antigen and Cell-Based Assays for the Detection of Non-HLA Antibodies

To date, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been the major focus in the approach to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMBR) in solid-organ transplantation. However, evidence from the clinic and published studies has shown that non-HLA antibodies, particularly anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs), are found either in the context of AMBR or synergistically in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Numerous studies have explored the influence of AECAs on clinical outcomes, yet the determination of the exact clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation is not fully established. This is due to highly heterogeneous study designs including differences in testing methods and outcome measures. Efforts to develop reliable and sensitive diagnostic non-HLA antibody tests are continuously made. This is essential considering the technical difficulties of non-HLA antibody assays and the large variation in reported incidences of antibodies. In addition, it is important to take donor specificity into account in order to draw clinically relevant conclusions from non-HLA antibody assays. Here, we provide an overview of non-HLA solid-phase and cell-based crossmatch assays for use in solid-organ transplantation that are currently available, either in a research setting or commercially.

The Pre-Transplant Non-HLA Antibody Burden Associates With the Development of Histology of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Many kidney allografts fail due to the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), related to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA). However, the histology of ABMR can also be observed in patients without HLA-DSA. While some non-HLA antibodies have been related to the histology of ABMR, it is not well known to what extent they contribute to kidney allograft injury. Here we aimed to investigate the role of 82 different non-HLA antibodies in the occurrence of histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation.

Methods

We included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2004-2013 in a single center and had biobanked serum. Pre- and post-transplant sera (n=2870) were retrospectively tested for the presence of 82 different non-HLA antibodies using a prototype bead assay on Luminex (Immucor, Inc). A ratio was calculated between the measured MFI value and the cut-off MFI defined by the vendor for each non-HLA target.

Results

874 patients had available pretransplant sera and were included in this analysis. Of them, 133 (15.2%) received a repeat kidney allograft, and 100 (11.4%) had pretransplant HLA-DSA. In total, 204 (23.3%) patients developed histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. In 79 patients (38.7%) the histology of ABMR was explained by pretransplant or de novo HLA-DSA. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed that only the broadly non-HLA sensitized (number of positive non-HLA antibodies) patients and those with the highest total strength of the non-HLA antibodies (total ratios of the positive non-HLA antibodies) were independently associated with increased rates of histology of ABMR after transplantation. Additionally, independent associations were found for antibodies against TUBB (HR=2.40; 95% CI 1.37 – 4.21, p=0.002), Collagen III (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.08 – 2.58, p=0.02), VCL (HR=2.04; 95% CI 1.12 – 3.71, p=0.02) and STAT6 (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.01 – 2.15, p=0.04). The overall posttransplant non-HLA autoreactivity was not associated with increased rates of ABMRh.

Conclusions

This study shows that patients highly and broadly sensitized against non-HLA targets are associated with an increased risk of ABMR histology after kidney transplantations in the absence of HLA-DSA. Also, some pretransplant non‐HLA autoantibodies are individually associated with increased rates of ABMR histology. However, whether these associations are clinically relevant and represent causality, warrants further studies.

Differential Treatment Effects for Renal Transplant Recipients With DSA-Positive or DSA-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the main cause of renal allograft loss. The most common treatment strategy is based on plasmapheresis plus the subsequent administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Unfortunately, no approved long-term therapy is available for ABMR. The current study was designed to analyze the effect of various ABMR treatment approaches on allograft survival and to compare treatment effects in the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).

Methods

This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 102 renal allograft recipients who had biopsy-proven ABMR after transplant. DSA was detectable in 61 of the 102 patients. Initial standard treatment of ABMR consisted of plasmapheresis (PS) or immunoadsorption (IA), followed by a single course of IVIG. In case of nonresponse or recurrence, additional immunosuppressive medications, such as rituximab, bortezomib, thymoglobulin, or eculizumab, were administered. In a second step, persistent ABMR was treated with increased maintenance immunosuppression, long-term therapy with IVIG (more than 1 year), or both.

Results

Overall graft survival among transplant patients with ABMR was <50% after 3 years of follow-up. Compared to the use of PS/IA and IVIG alone, the use of additional immunosuppressive medications had no beneficial effect on allograft survival (p = 0.83). Remarkably, allografts survival rates were comparable between patients treated with the combination of PS/IA and IVIG and those treated with a single administration of IVIG (p = 0.18). Renal transplant patients with ABMR but without DSAs benefited more from increased maintenance immunosuppression than did DSA-positive patients with ABMR (p = 0.01). Recipients with DSA-positive ABMR exhibited significantly better allograft survival after long-term application of IVIG for more than 1 year than did recipients with DSA-negative ABMR (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The results of our single-center cohort study involving kidney transplant recipients with ABMR suggest that long-term application of IVIG is more favorable for DSA-positive recipients, whereas intensification of maintenance immunosuppression is more effective for recipients with DSA-negative ABMR.

Shotgun Immunoproteomics for Identification of Nonhuman Leukocyte Antigens Associated With Cellular Dysfunction in Heart Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant consensus panel notes that too little data exist regarding the role of non-HLA in allograft rejection. We developed a novel shotgun immunoproteomic approach to determine the identities and potential roles non-HLA play in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

Serum was collected longitudinally from heart transplant recipients experiencing AMR in the absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (n = 6) and matched no rejection controls (n = 7). Antidonor heart affinity chromatography columns were formed by recipient immunoglobulin G immobilization at transplantation, acute rejection, and chronic postrejection time points. Affinity chromatography columns were used to capture antigens from individual patient's donor heart biopsies collected at transplantation. Captured proteins were subjected to quantitative proteomic analysis and the longitudinal response was calculated.

RESULTS

Overlap in antigen-specific response between AMR and non-AMR patients was only 8.3%. In AMR patients, a total of 155 non-HLAs were identified, with responses toward 43 high prevalence antigens found in ≥50% of patients. Immunofluorescence staining for representative high prevalence antigens demonstrated that their abundance increased at acute rejection, correlating with their respective non-HLA antibody response. Physiological changes in cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell function, following in vitro culture with patient immunoglobulin G, correlated with response toward several high prevalence antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates a novel high-throughput strategy to identify clinically relevant non-HLA from donor endomyocardial biopsy. Such a technique has the potential to improve understanding of longitudinal timing of antigen-specific responses and their cause and effect relationship in graft rejection.

The evolution of histological changes suggestive of antibody-mediated injury, in the presence and absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies

The interplay between donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA), histology of active antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR_h ), transplant glomerulopathy (cg) and graft failure in kidney transplantation remains insufficiently understood. We performed a single-center cohort study (n=1000) including 2761 protocol and 833 indication biopsies. Patients with pre-transplant HLA-DSA were more prone to develop aABMRh (OR 22.7, 95% CI, 11.8 - 43.7, p<0.001), cg (OR 5.76, 95% CI, 1.67 - 19.8, p=0.006) and aABMRh/cg (OR 19.5, 95% CI, 10.6 - 35.9, p<0.001). The negative impact of pre-transplant HLA-DSA on graft survival (HR 2.12, 95% CI, 1.41 - 3.20, p<0.001) was partially mediated through aABMRh and cg occurrence. When adjusted for time-dependent HLA-DSA (HR 4.03, 95% CI, 2.21 - 7.15, p=0.002), graft failure was only affected by aABMR_h when cg was evident. In HLA-DSA negative patients, aABMR_h was associated with impaired graft outcome only when evolving to cg (HR 1.32, 95% CI, 1.07 - 1.61, p=0.008). We conclude that the kinetics of HLA-DSA are important to estimate the rate of graft failure, and that histological follow-up is necessary to discover, often subclinical, ABMR and cg. In the absence of HLA-DSA, patients experience similar histological lesions and the evolution to transplant glomerulopathy associates with impaired graft outcome.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Clinical Relevance and Treatment Options for Antibody-mediated Rejection Associated With Non-HLA Antibodies

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell-dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

The FCGR3A 158 V/V-genotype is associated with decreased survival of renal allografts with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection

Natural killer (NK) cells express the Fc-gamma receptor CD16 (FCGR3A) and could therefore mediate renal endothelial cell damage in cases of chronic-active antibody mediated rejection (c-aABMR). The V/V-genotype of the FCGR3A 158 F/V polymorphism is associated with increased CD16 expression and cytotoxicity by NK cells. This study evaluated whether this genotype is associated with the diagnosis of c-aABMR and renal allograft loss. The distribution of the FGCR3A 158 F/V-genotypes was not different for c-aABMR cases (N = 133) compared to control kidney transplant recipients (N = 116, P = 0.65). The V-allele was associated with increased median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD16 by NK cells (MFI 3.5 × 10⁴ versus 1.3 × 10⁴ for V/V and F/F-genotype, P < 0.001). Increased expression of CD16 correlated with CD16-dependent degranulation of NK cells (R = 0.4; P = 0.02). Moreover, the V/V-genotype was significantly associated with a higher glomerulitis score and an independent risk factor (HR 1.98; P = 0.04) for decreased allograft survival. Death-censored graft survival in c-aABMR cases at 3 years follow-up was 33% for the FCGR3A 158 V/V-genotype versus 62% for the F/F-genotype. In conclusion, the FCGR3A V/V-genotype increases CD16-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity and is associated with a higher glomerulitis score and decreased graft survival in cases with c-aABMR.

Elevated AT1R Antibody and Morbidity in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant Using Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

We studied longitudinal levels of angiotensin-II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and their effects on adverse events (death, treated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) in patients who were bridged to heart transplant using a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sera of 77 patients bridged to heart transplant (from 2009 to 2017) were tested for AT1R-Ab and CRP before and after LVAD. Elevated AT1R-Ab was defined as >10.0 U/mL. The median follow-up after transplant was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.2-5.6 years). After LVAD, AT1R-Ab levels increased from baseline and remained elevated until transplant. Freedom from adverse events at 5 years was lower in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels at time of transplant. In an adjusted, multivariable Cox analysis, an AT1R-Ab level of >10 U/mL was associated with developing the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.2, P = .017). Although C-reactive protein levels were high before and after LVAD placement, C-reactive protein did not correlate with AT1R-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

In LVAD patients bridged to heart transplant, an increased AT1R-Ab level at time of transplant was associated with poor outcomes after heart transplant. Post-LVAD AT1R-Ab elevations were not correlated with serum markers of systemic inflammation. Larger studies are needed to examine the pathologic role of AT1R-Ab in heart transplant.

Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.

Immunosuppression and Graft Rejection in Living-related HLA-identical Renal Transplantation: The RADOVFULL Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the immunosuppressive regimens and graft rejection rates in living-related HLA-identical (LR HLAid) renal transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of the French national database for LR HLAid renal transplantations performed between 2002 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine risk factors for graft rejection in LR HLAid recipients.

RESULTS

A total of 27 218 renal transplantations were performed, of whom 163 had a LR HLAid donor. About immunosuppressive treatment, <60% of the cohort had induction therapy with polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, 28% did not receive calcineurin inhibitors, and 36% did not receive steroids in maintenance. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was diagnosed in 21 patients (12.9%). Rejection occurred on an average of 24 months after transplantation, in 28.5% of the cases after minimization of immunosuppression. Factors associated with rejection were age of recipient (OR, 0.91 [0.84-0.96]; P = 0.003), the body mass index of donors (odds ratio [OR], 1.22 [1.04-1.46]; P = 0.01), and minimization of immunosuppression (OR, 26.2 [5.48-166.6]; P < 0.001). Overall and graft survival rates were not statistically different according to rejection at 1, 5, and 10 years posttransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimization of immunosuppression should be done with caution in LR HLAid renal transplantations.

Results and reflections from the PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions in kidney transplantation: A mini-review

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The waiting time for a deceased donor kidney in the Netherlands is approximately 3 years. Mortality among patients on the waiting list is high. The aim of the PROCARE consortium (PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions) was to decrease the waiting time by providing a matching algorithm yielding a prolonged graft survival and less HLA-immunization compared with the currently used Eurotransplant Kidney allocation system. In this study, 6097 kidney transplants carried out between January 1995 and December 2005 were re-examined with modern laboratory techniques and insights that were not available during that time period. In this way, we could identify potential new parameters that can be used to improve the matching algorithm and prolong graft survival. All eight University Medical Centers in the Netherlands participated in this multicenter study. To improve the matching algorithm, we used as central hypothesis that the combined presence of class-I and -II single-antigen bead (SAB)-defined donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) prior to transplantation, non-HLA antibodies, the number of B- and/or T-cell epitopes recognized on donor HLA, and specific polymorphisms in effector mechanisms of IgG were associated with an increased risk for graft failure. The purpose of this article is to relate the results obtained from the PROCARE consortium study to other studies published in recent years. The clinical relevance of SAB-defined DSA, complement-fixing DSA, non-HLA antibodies, and the effector functions of (non)-HLA-antibodies will be discussed.

Histological picture of antibody-mediated rejection without donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies: Clinical presentation and implications for outcome

In this cohort study (n = 935 transplantations), we investigated the phenotype and risk of graft failure in patients with histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the absence of circulating donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA), and compared this to patients with definite ABMR and HLA-DSA-positivity. The histological picture did not differ between HLA-DSA-positive (n = 85) and HLA-DSA-negative (n = 123) cases of ABMR histology, apart from increased complement split product 4d (C4d) deposition in the peritubular capillaries in HLA-DSA-positive cases. Histology of ABMR without HLA-DSA was more transient than DSA-positive ABMR, and patients with ABMR histology without HLA-DSA had graft survival superior to that of HLA-DSA-positive patients, independent of concomitant T cell-mediated rejection (38.2%) or borderline changes (17.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of graft failure was not higher in patients with histological picture of ABMR (ABMR_h ) in the absence of HLA-DSA, compared to patients without ABMR_h . Despite an association between C4d deposition and HLA-DSA-positivity, using C4d deposition as alternative for the DSA criterion in the diagnosis of ABMR, as proposed in Banff 2017, did not contribute to the prognosis of graft function and graft failure. We concluded that biopsies with ABMR_h but without detectable HLA-DSA represent a distinct, often transient phenotype with superior allograft survival.

Microvascular inflammation in renal allograft biopsies assessed by endothelial and leukocyte co-immunostain: a retrospective study on reproducibility and clinical/prognostic correlates

The most prominent histologic lesion in antibody-mediated rejection is microvascular inflammation (MVI); however, its recognition and scoring can be challenging and poorly reproducible between pathologists. We developed a dual immunohistochemical (IHC)-stain (anti-CD34/anti-CD45 for endothelium/leukocytes) as ancillary tool to improve on the semi-quantitative Banff scores and allow quantification of MVI. We examined the relationship between CD34-CD45 IHC-based quantitative MVI score (the inflamed peritubular capillary ratio, iptcr) and renal-graft failure or donor-specific antibodies (DSA) strength at the time of biopsy. Quantitative iptcr score was significantly associated with renal graft failure (hazard ratio 1.81, per 1 SD-unit [0.13 points] of iptcr-increase; P = 0.026) and predicted the presence and strength of DSA (ordinal odds ratio: 2.42; P = 0.005; 75 biopsies/60 kidney transplant recipients; 30 HLA- and/or ABO-incompatible). Next, we assessed inter-pathologist agreement for ptc score and ptc extent (focal/diffuse) using CD34-CD45 IHC as compared to conventional stain. Compared to conventional stain, CD34-CD45 IHC significantly increased inter-pathologist agreement on ptc score severity and extent (κ-coefficient from 0.52-0.80 and 0.46-0.68, respectively, P < 0.001). Our findings show that CD34-CD45 IHC improves reproducibility of MVI scoring and facilitates MVI quantification and introduction of a dual anti-CD34/CD45 has the potential to improve recognition of MVI ahead of DSA results.

Histopathological Relevance of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor in Renal Transplant Biopsy

The occurrence of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies is thought to be a risk factor for transplant injury, but the relationship of AT1R to graft loss in renal transplantation has not been assessed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of AT1R and its relationship with graft loss in patients who had a renal transplant biopsy for cause.

METHODS

AT1R immunoreactivity was analyzed in 170 renal transplant biopsies. Immunohistochemical evaluation of AT1R expression was performed on 4 μm-thick paraffin sections mounted on silanized slides. AT1R expression was analyzed in 5 compartments: 1. glomeruli, 2. renal blood vessels (small and intermediate arteries), 3. peritubular capillaries, 4. tubular epithelium, and 5. interstitium based on a 3-step scale.

RESULTS

Initially we checked 170 consecutive samples of biopsies for the immunoreactivity of the AT1R. The study finally included 118 renal transplant patients in 1-year observation after the biopsy. The renal allograft biopsy was performed between 6 days and 24 years after transplantation and the diagnosis was based on Banff criteria. We observed positive immunostaining of AT1R in tubular epithelium in 26.3% (42/118) of patients. A total of 7 patients had staining assessed as 2 and 35 as 1. One year post-biopsy graft loss in the AT1R (+) patients was 35.7 % (15/42) compared to 14.5% (11/76) in the AT1R (-) group (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of AT1R in tubular epithelium of the biopsy for cause was associated with significantly higher graft loss. The relevance of AT1R should be considered for better transplant immunological risk assessment.

Pre-transplant Screening for Non-HLA Antibodies: Who should be Tested?

Retrospective studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) have linked these antibodies to allograft injury. Because rising healthcare costs dictate judicious use of laboratory testing, we sought to define characteristics of kidney transplant recipients who may benefit from screening for non-HLA antibodies. Kidney recipients transplanted between 2011 and 2016 at Johns Hopkins, were evaluated for AT1R-Ab and AECA. Pre-transplant antibody levels were compared to clinical and biopsy indications of graft dysfunction. Biopsies were graded using the Banff' 2009-2013 criteria. AT1R-Ab and AECA were detected using ELISA and endothelial cell crossmatches, respectively. AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients who were positive for AECAs. Re-transplanted patients (p < 0.0001), males (p = 0.008) and those with FSGS (p = 0.04) and younger (p = 0.04) at time of transplantation were more likely to be positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation. Recipients who were positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation had increases in serum creatinine within 3 months post-transplantation (p < 0.0001) and developed abnormal biopsies earlier than did AT1R-Ab negative patients (126 days versus 368 days respectively; p = 0.02). Defining a clinical protocol to identify and preemptively treat patients at risk for acute rejection with detectable non-HLA antibodies is an important objective for the transplant community.

Polyreactive natural antibodies in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), especially in its chronic manifestation, is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of late graft loss following solid organ transplantation. In recent years, autoantibodies have emerged as a significant component of the humoral response to allografts alongside anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. These include polyreactive antibodies also known as natural antibodies (Nabs) secreted by innate B cells. A hallmark of Nabs is their capacity to bind altered self such as oxidized lipids on apoptotic cells. This review provides an overview of these overlooked antibodies and their implication in the pathophysiology of ABMR.

RECENT FINDINGS

New evidence reported in the past few years support a contribution of immunoglobulin (Ig) G Nabs to ABMR. Serum IgG Nabs levels are significantly higher in patients with ABMR compared with control kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function. Pretransplant IgG Nabs are also associated with ABMR and late graft loss. IgG Nabs are almost exclusively of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses and have the capacity to activate complement.

SUMMARY

In conclusion, Nabs are important elements in host immune responses to solid organ grafts. The recent description of their implication in ABMR and late kidney graft loss warrants further investigation into their pathogenic potential.

HLA Class Ia and Ib Polyreactive Anti-HLA-E IgG2a Monoclonal Antibodies (TFL-006 and TFL-007) Suppress Anti-HLA IgG Production by CD19+ B Cells and Proliferation of CD4+ T Cells While Upregulating Tregs

The anti-HLA-E IgG2a mAbs, TFL-006 and TFL-007, reacted with all HLA-I antigens, similar to the therapeutic preparations of IVIg. Indeed, IVIg lost its HLA reactivity, when its HLA-E reactivity was adsorbed out. US-FDA approved IVIg to reduce antibodies in autoimmune diseases. But the mechanism underlying IVIg-mediated antibody reduction could not be ascertained due to the presence of other polyclonal antibodies. In spite of it, the cost prohibitive high or low IVIg is administered to patients waiting for donor organ and for allograft recipients for lowering antiallograft antibodies. A mAb that could mimic IVIg in lowering Abs, with defined mechanism of action, would be highly beneficial for patients. Demonstrably, the anti-HLA-E mAbs mimicked several functions of IVIg relevant to suppressing the antiallograft Abs. The mAbs suppressed activated T cells and anti-HLA antibody production by activated B cells, which were dose-wise superior to IVIg. The anti-HLA-E mAb expanded CD4+, CD25+, and Foxp3+ Tregs, which are known to suppress T and B cells involved in antibody production. These defined functions of the anti-HLA-E IgG2a mAbs at a level superior to IVIg encourage developing their humanized version to lower antibodies in allograft recipients, to promote graft survival, and to control autoimmune diseases.

Impact of Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen-Specific Antibodies in Kidney and Heart Transplantation

The presence of donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies has been shown to be associated with graft loss and decreased patient survival, but it is not uncommon that donor-specific HLA antibodies are absent in patients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection. In this review, we focus on the latest findings on antibodies against non-HLA antigens in kidney and heart transplantation. These non-HLA antigens include myosin, vimentin, Kα1 tubulin, collagen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. It is suggested that the detrimental effects of HLA antibodies and non-HLA antibodies synergize together to impact graft outcome. Injury of graft by HLA antibodies can cause the exposure of neo-antigens which in turn stimulate the production of antibodies against non-HLA antigens. On the other hand, the presence of non-HLA antibodies may increase the risk for a patient to develop HLA-specific antibodies. These findings indicate it is imperative to stratify the patient’s immunologic risk by assessing both HLA and non-HLA antibodies.

Not All Antibodies Are Created Equal: Factors That Influence Antibody Mediated Rejection

Consistent with Dr. Paul Terasaki's "humoral theory of rejection" numerous studies have shown that HLA antibodies can cause acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and decreased graft survival. New evidence also supports a role for antibodies to non-HLA antigens in AMR and allograft injury. Despite the remarkable efforts by leaders in the field who pioneered single antigen bead technology for detection of donor specific antibodies, a considerable amount of work is still needed to better define the antibody attributes that are associated with AMR pathology. This review highlights what is currently known about the clinical context of pre and posttransplant antibodies, antibody characteristics that influence AMR, and the paths after donor specific antibody production (no rejection, subclinical rejection, and clinical dysfunction with AMR).