1
|
Martínez-López MV, McLaughlin L, Molina-Pérez A, Pabisiak K, Primc N, Randhawa G, Rodríguez-Arias D, Suárez J, Wöhlke S, Delgado J. Mapping trust relationships in organ donation and transplantation: a conceptual model. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:93. [PMID: 37914997 PMCID: PMC10621073 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00965-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The organ donation and transplantation (ODT) system heavily relies on the willingness of individuals to donate their organs. While it is widely believed that public trust plays a crucial role in shaping donation rates, the empirical support for this assumption remains limited. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, this article takes a foundational approach by elucidating the concept of trust within the context of ODT. By examining the stakeholders involved, identifying influential factors, and mapping the intricate trust relationships among trustors, trustees, and objects of trust, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of trust dynamics in ODT. We employ maps and graphs to illustrate the functioning of these trust relationships, enabling a visual representation of the complex interactions within the ODT system. Through this conceptual groundwork, we pave the way for future empirical research to investigate the link between trust and organ donation rates, informed by a clarified understanding of trust in ODT. This study can also provide valuable insights to inform interventions and policies aimed at enhancing organ donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Victoria Martínez-López
- Department of Philosophy I, FiloLab-UGR, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy.
| | - Leah McLaughlin
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Alberto Molina-Pérez
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy.
- Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA), CSIC, Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Krzysztof Pabisiak
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
- Dept Nephrology Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Nadia Primc
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
- Institute of History and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Department, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire, UK
| | - David Rodríguez-Arias
- Department of Philosophy I, FiloLab-UGR, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
| | - Jorge Suárez
- Department of Philosophy I, FiloLab-UGR, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Sabine Wöhlke
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
- Department Health Sciences, Faculty Life Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Janet Delgado
- Department of Philosophy I, FiloLab-UGR, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT), Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soqia J, Ataya J, Alhomsi R, Soqia H, Kakaje A, Saadoun R, Hamzeh A. Attitudes and factors influencing organ donation decision-making in Damascus, Syria: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:18150. [PMID: 37875722 PMCID: PMC10598269 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45388-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ donation is vital to saving lives, but its success depends on people's willingness to donate organs. This descriptive cross-sectional survey aimed to investigate attitudes towards organ donation in Damascus, Syria. Understanding attitudes is crucial for the success of organ donation programs, especially in countries with similar settings. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey aimed at understanding patients' attitudes towards organ donation in Damascus, Syria. Data was collected through a carefully constructed validated survey through face-to-face interviews. 600 participants were randomly interviewed, 62.8% agreed to donate their organs after death, with helping others being the primary reason. Religious beliefs were the primary reason for organ refusal in males, while for females, it was lack of knowledge and religious beliefs. However, there were no significant differences between genders or educational level and age groups in the acceptance of organ donation. The percentage of those who agree to donate their organs after death encourages taking an effective step to build an integrated donation system, not just a center. Bearing in mind that there is no correlation with age, gender or even educational level, which means that the system may include different groups of society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jameel Soqia
- Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
- German-Syrian Research Society e.V., Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Jamal Ataya
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria
| | - Rawan Alhomsi
- Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baath University, Homs, Syria
| | - Horiya Soqia
- Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
| | - Ameer Kakaje
- Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
- University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rakan Saadoun
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Ammar Hamzeh
- Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Molina-Pérez A, Werner-Felmayer G, Van Assche K, Jensen AMB, Delgado J, Flatscher-Thöni M, Hannikainen IR, Rodriguez-Arias D, Schicktanz S, Wöhlke S. Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation: a cross-national survey. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2080. [PMCID: PMC9664433 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14476-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
European countries are increasingly harmonising their organ donation and transplantation policies. Although a growing number of nations are moving to presumed consent to deceased organ donation, no attempts have been made to harmonise policies on individual consent and the role of the family in the decision-making process. Little is known about public awareness of and attitudes towards the role of the family in their own country and European harmonisation on these health policy dimensions. To improve understanding of these issues, we examined what university students think about the role of the family in decision-making in deceased organ donation and about harmonising consent policies within Europe.
Methods
Using LimeSurvey© software, we conducted a comparative cross-sectional international survey of 2193 university students of health sciences and humanities/social sciences from Austria (339), Belgium (439), Denmark (230), Germany (424), Greece (159), Romania (190), Slovenia (190), and Spain (222).
Results
Participants from opt-in countries may have a better awareness of the family’s legal role than those from opt-out countries. Most respondents opposed the family veto, but they were more ambivalent towards the role of the family as a surrogate decision-maker. The majority of participants were satisfied with the family’s legal role. However, those who were unsatisfied preferred to limit family involvement. Overall, participants were opposed to the idea of national sovereignty over consent policies. They favoured an opt-out policy harmonisation and were divided over opt-in. Their views on harmonisation of family involvement were consistent with their personal preferences.
Conclusions
There is overall division on whether families should have a surrogate role, and substantial opposition to granting them sole authority over decision-making. If European countries were to harmonise their policies on consent for organ donation, an opt-out system that grants families a surrogate decision-making role may enjoy the widest public support.
Collapse
|
4
|
Saxena D, Yasobant S, Trivedi P, Bhavsar P. Complexity of Decision-Making!: Case Studies of Cadaveric Organ Donations in Ahmedabad, India. Healthc Policy 2022; 15:2147-2154. [DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s376879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
5
|
Attitudes of the Brazilian Population Toward Organ Donation. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:2737-2740. [PMID: 36506232 PMCID: PMC9727522 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
6
|
Molina-Pérez A, Rodríguez-Arias D, Delgado J. Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057107. [PMID: 36441113 PMCID: PMC9462118 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the direct impact of consent policy defaults per se on deceased organ recovery rates when considering the role of the family in the decision-making process. This study does not take into account any indirect effects of defaults, such as potential psychological and behavioural effects on individuals and their relatives. DESIGN Based on previous work regarding consent policies, we created a conceptual model of the decision-making process for deceased organ recovery that included any scenario that could be directly influenced by opt-in or opt-out policies. We then applied this model to internationally published data of the consent process to determine how frequently policy defaults could apply. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We measure the direct impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on deceased organ recovery. RESULTS Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. They only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The direct impact of consent policy defaults is typically circumscribed to a range of 0%-5% of all opportunities for organ recovery. Our study also shows that the intervention of the family improves organ retrieval under opt-in but hinders it under opt-out. CONCLUSIONS This study may warn policy makers that, by emphasising the need to introduce presumed consent to increase organ recovery rates, they might be overestimating the influence of the default and underestimating the power granted to families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Molina-Pérez
- Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Cordoba, Spain
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| | - David Rodríguez-Arias
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| | - Janet Delgado
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ethical Solutions to the Problem of Organ Shortage. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2022; 31:297-309. [PMID: 35899548 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180121000955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Organ shortage is a major survival issue for millions of people worldwide. Globally 1.2 million people die each year from kidney failure. In this paper, we critically examine and find lacking extant proposals for increasing organ supply, such as opting in and opt out for deceased donor organs, and parochial altruism and paired kidney exchange for live organs. We defend two ethical solutions to the problem of organ shortage. One is to make deceased donor organs automatically available for transplant without requiring consent from the donor or their relatives. The other is for society to buy nonvital organs in a strictly regulated market and provide them to people in need for free.
Collapse
|