Variable platelet responsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel: role of platelet function and genetic polymorphism testing

Hemodynamic studies of platelet thrombosis using microfluidics

Platelets contribute to thrombus formation in a variety of ways. Platelet adhesion, activation, and thrombus growth depend greatly on the type of hemodynamic environment surrounding an inciting event. Microfluidic systems may be used to explore these relationships. In this review, we describe some important considerations required in the design of a microfluidic system and identify some limitations that may require use of a macroscale system.

Endovascular treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis

Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis seems a safe, effective and useful technique for resolving symptoms and improving blood flow to the posterior circulation, with a low complication rate and good long-term results. In patients with severe tortuosity of the vessel, stent placement is a real challenge. The new coronary balloon-expandable stents may be preferred. A large variability of restenosis rates has been reported. Drug-eluting stents may be the solution. After a comprehensive review of the literature, it can be concluded that percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of extracranial VA stenosis is technically feasible, but there is insufficient evidence from randomized trials to demonstrate that endovascular management is superior to best medical management.

Pharmacogenetics: past, present and future

The subject area of pharmacogenetics, also known as pharmacogenomics, has a long history. Research in this area has led to fundamental discoveries, which have helped our understanding of the reasons why individuals differ in the way they handle drugs, and ultimately in the way they respond to drugs, either in terms of efficacy or toxicity. However, not much of this knowledge has been translated into clinical practice, most drug-gene associations that have some evidence of clinical validity have not progressed to clinical settings. Advances in genomics since 2000, including the ready availability of data on the variability of the human genome, have provided us with unprecedented opportunities to understand variability in drug responses, and the opportunity to incorporate this into patient care. This is only likely to occur with a systematic approach that evaluates and overcomes the different translational gaps in taking a biomarker from discovery to clinical practice. In this article, I explore the history of pharmacogenetics, appraise the current state of research in this area, and finish off with suggestions for progressing in the field in the future.

Proton pump inhibitors, genetic polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel therapy

Clopidogrel has become part of the mainstay of therapy for acute coronary syndromes and in patients post stenting. Clopidogrel is a pro drug and is metabolised by liver enzymes, particularly CYP2C19, into its active form. A considerable proportion of patients have a poor response to clopidogrel and this may be due to several factors. Genetic polymorphisms involved in clopidogrel's absorption, metabolism and activity at the platelet may interfere with its antiplatelet actions. Further, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may interfere with clopidogrel's actions by functionally reducing the ability of CYP2C19 to convert clopidogrel to its active metabolite. By attenuating clopidogrel's actions, both polymorphisms and drug interactions may increase the risk of thrombotic events during clopidogrel therapy. This review will explore the current evidence relating to the association between PPIs, genetic polymorphisms and poor response to clopidogrel. Routine genetic testing cannot be recommended for patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, it may have a role for patients with an episode of stent thrombosis, prior to planned high-risk stenting or major bleeding. Regarding concomitant clopidogrel and PPI therapy, it is recommended that only patients with previous gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or multiple risk factors for GI bleeding should be prescribed gastroprotection. This is due to the uncertainty surrounding the clinical significance of this interaction given the discordant biochemical and clinical data, conflicting results from observational studies and the limitations of the COGENT study. Pantoprazole seems least likely to interact with clopidogrel and most suitable for use in patients receiving DAPT.

Determination of the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients with coronary artery disease by using various platelet-function tests

BACKGROUND

Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients' responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various platelet-function tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis.

RESULTS

The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients' identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the κ statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.

Individual variability of response and non-response to acetyl salicylic acid after cardiac surgery

Insufficient inhibition of platelet function by acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) or other platelet inhibitors is a risk factor for arterial thrombosis in cardiovascular patients. We wanted to collect and analyse information on the frequency and probable causes of non-response to ASA in patients prior to and after cardiac surgery. One hundred and one patients (mean age 68 ± 9 years) undergoing cardiac surgery (98 patients with coronary bypass grafting, 18 cases had combined valve replacement, and three patients with only valve replacement) were enrolled. Post-operatively all patients received metamizole for analgesia. Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma was induced by arachidonic acid (AA; 1.6 mM) or ADP (3 mM) in the absence and presence of exogenous ASA (100 µM). ASA non-response was defined as a maximum AA-induced aggregation of >30%. Eighty eight patients had pre-operative medication with ASA (100 mg/d), and ASA non-response was found in 24%. Irrespective of whether or not ASA medication was continued immediately after surgery, incidence of non-response increased to 55% at the first post-operative day. During continuous post-operative ASA medication (100 mg/d), 65% of patients were non-responder at fifth-7th post-operative day. When estimated on the basis of exogenously added ASA, non-response was observed pre-operative in 10%, at first post-operative day in 53% and at fifth-7th post-operative day in 39% of the patients. Twenty six of the 52 patients who did not adequately respond to exogenous ASA at the first post-operative day became responders when tested at the fifth-7th post-operative day, and 13 of the 46 responders became non-responders. The conversions were not due to small changes around the threshold of 30% aggregation but due to a highly significant decrease or increase in the extend of aggregation. Neither extracorporal circulation nor co-medication with clopidogrel had any significant influence on the platelet response to ASA medication or exogenously added ASA. Some non-steroidal analgesics, including metamizole, have been suggested to prevent inhibition of platelet cylcooxygenase by ASA. However, in 10 healthy volunteers we did not observe any interference of metamizole with the response to ASA. In conclusion, platelet response to ASA is markedly decreased after cardiac surgery. The underlying mechanisms and the clinical consequences of the post-operative instability of non-response to ASA need further evaluation.

Laboratory evaluation of aspirin responsiveness

Aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet medication. Laboratory monitoring of aspirin response has recently become a topic of interest due to potential impacts on patient management and clinical outcomes. This article summarizes available laboratory testing of aspirin response with focus on technical issues, limitations, and current opinion on the utility of routine patient testing.