Vaginoplasty Modifications to Improve Vulvar Aesthetics

[The history of vaginoplasty: Technical and sociological advances]

Technical advances in gender-affirming genital surgery have allowed the modern surgeon to create a vagina, vulva and clitoris from a male sex. This surgery, commonly known as vaginoplasty, should in fact be identified as aidopoiesis, since it is not a question of improving an already existing vagina but of creating a female sex. Numerous technical advances made since 1930 throughout the world now offer a safe and proven surgical strategy for female genital gender affirmation. Most of these techniques are derived from advances in intersex genital surgery. The first vaginoplasties described in the context of gender affirmation were performed in Berlin in the 1930s. After the Second World War, the greatest advances in vaginoplasty were made in Denmark. It was not until Geroges Burou in Casablanca and Harold Gillies, aided by Ralph Millard in England, in the mid-fifties that the modern technique of invagination of the penile skin took over from neo-vaginal grafting techniques. The creation of the clitoris from the glans penis and a more aesthetic vulva were the major advances from the 1970s. Other flap or intestinal transplant techniques were also developed, often to correct the failure of penile skin invagination. Some of the patients who benefited from these early technical advances, such as Lili Elbe and Christine Jorgensen later on, helped to make this surgery, which had long remained taboo, popular with the general public. Pioneers such as the gynaecologist Georges Burou in Casablanca have contributed, with the greatest discretion, to the well-being of gender-affirmed people by improving these techniques. Today, this hard-won heritage cannot be ignored by surgeons interested in vaginoplasty.

Construction of Sensitive Labia Minora-Clitoris-Clitoral Hood Complex in Sex Reassignment Surgery in Circumcised Populations: Butterfly Flap

INTRODUCTION

The construction of the labia minora from preputial tissues in uncircumcised patients and the preservation of the sensitivity of the labia minora are not new ideas. However, evidently, this technique is designed for uncircumcised cases.There is no preputial tissue in the circumcised population. However, this tissue, whose inner and outer layers have different structures and appearances, is critical in the construction of the labia minora. Instead, there is an area of reepithelialization and reinnervation that heals secondarily or is closed primarily, depending on the circumcision. Also, this new skin area is devoid of the natural oily secretions of the prepuce. In addition, the removal of preputial tissue in circumcised individuals may cause uncertainty in terms of vascularity or sensitivity. In this study, we share our clinical experience regarding large labia minora creation (with preserved flap circulation without vaginal reconstruction concerns) and the use of most of the urethra as a mesh graft in the circumcised population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2010 and 2022, 19 cases were operated on with this technique. All cases were primary interventions for male-to-female sex reassignment. Because this design of the sensitive inner surface of the labia minora, which ensured vascular safety, was not found in the literature, the design was named "butterfly flap" because of its shape.

EVALUATION OF SENSATION

The area corresponding to both wings of the butterfly flap was evaluated with the Semmes Weinstein Monofilament test, with the patient's eyes closed, in the preoperative period. Likewise, the sensitivity of the inner surface of the labia minora in the first year of 10 patients who were able to attend follow-up clinical examination was evaluated with the same method.

RESULTS

In our study, a clitoris and a labia minora with sensory innervation were obtained by elevating the superior 180-degree area of the neurovascular bundle surrounding the penis and using the butterfly flap we prepared in the area fed by this bundle. Fourteen cases stated that the sensation of the newly formed labia minora was erogenous and different from the tactile sensation on the body of the penis.

ESSM Position Statement "Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery"

Introduction

Much has been published on the surgical and functional results following Gender Affirming Surgery (‘GAS’) in trans individuals. Comprehensive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS, however, are generally lacking.

Aim

To review the impact of various GAS on sexual wellbeing in treatment seeking trans individuals, and provide a comprehensive list of clinical recommendations regarding the various surgical options of GAS on behalf of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

Methods

The Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were reviewed on the results of sexual wellbeing after GAS.

Main Outcomes Measure

The task force established consensus statements regarding the somatic and general requirements before GAS and of GAS: orchiectomy-only, vaginoplasty, breast augmentation, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery, mastectomy, removal of the female sexual organs, metaidoioplasty, and phalloplasty. Outcomes pertaining to sexual wellbeing- sexual satisfaction, sexual relationship, sexual response, sexual activity, enacted sexual script, sexuality, sexual function, genital function, quality of sex life and sexual pleasure- are provided for each statement separately.

Results

The present position paper provides clinicians with statements and recommendations for clinical practice, regarding GAS and their effects on sexual wellbeing in trans individuals. These data, are limited and may not be sufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for every surgical option. Findings regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS were mainly positive. There was no data on sexual wellbeing following orchiectomy-only, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery or the removal of the female sexual organs. The choice for GAS is dependent on patient preference, anatomy and health status, and the surgeon's skills. Trans individuals may benefit from studies focusing exclusively on the effects of GAS on sexual wellbeing.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests positive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. We advise more studies that underline the evidence regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. This position statement may aid both clinicians and patients in decision-making process regarding the choice for GAS. Özer M, Toulabi SP, Fisher AD, et al. ESSM Position Statement “Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery”. Sex Med 2022;10:100471.

Surgical and demographic trends in genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender women: 40 years of experience in Amsterdam

This was a single-centre, retrospective study of transgender women undergoing genital gender-affirming surgery. A chart study was conducted, recording individual demographics, all genital surgical procedures, and surgical techniques. Procedure incidence, techniques employed, and demographic variations over the years were analysed.