1
|
Stolk THR, van den Boogaard E, Huirne JAF, van Mello NM. Fertility counseling guide for transgender and gender diverse people. Int J Transgend Health 2023; 24:361-367. [PMID: 37901065 PMCID: PMC10601500 DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2023.2257062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T. H. R. Stolk
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E. van den Boogaard
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. A. F. Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N. M. van Mello
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stolk THR, Asseler JD, Huirne JAF, van den Boogaard E, van Mello NM. Desire for children and fertility preservation in transgender and gender-diverse people: A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 87:102312. [PMID: 36806443 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The decision to pursue one's desire for children is a basic human right. For transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, gender-affirming care may alter the possibilities to fulfill one's desire for children due to the impact of this treatment on their reproductive organs. We systematically included 76 studies of varying quality describing the desire for children and parenthood; fertility counseling and utilization; and fertility preservation options and outcomes in TGD people. The majority of TGD people expressed a desire for children. Fertility preservation utilization rates were low as there are many barriers to pursue fertility preservation. The most utilized fertility preservation strategies include oocyte vitrification and sperm banking through masturbation. Oocyte vitrification showed successful outcomes, even after testosterone cessation. Sperm analyses when banking sperm showed a lower quality compared to cis male samples even prior to gender-affirming hormone treatment and an uncertain recovery of spermatogenesis after discontinuing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H R Stolk
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J D Asseler
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J A F Huirne
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - E van den Boogaard
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - N M van Mello
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Nie I, Mulder CL, Meißner A, Schut Y, Holleman EM, van der Sluis WB, Hannema SE, den Heijer M, Huirne J, van Pelt AMM, van Mello NM. Histological study on the influence of puberty suppression and hormonal treatment on developing germ cells in transgender women. Hum Reprod 2021; 37:297-308. [PMID: 34791270 PMCID: PMC8804334 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can transgender women cryopreserve germ cells obtained from their orchiectomy specimen for fertility preservation, after having used puberty suppression and/or hormonal treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER In the vast majority of transgender women, there were still immature germ cells present in the orchiectomy specimen, and in 4.7% of transgender women—who all initiated medical treatment in Tanner stage 4 or higher—mature spermatozoa were found, which would enable cryopreservation of spermatozoa or testicular tissue after having used puberty suppression and/or hormonal treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Gender affirming treatment (i.e. puberty suppression, hormonal treatment, and subsequent orchiectomy) impairs reproductive function in transgender women. Although semen cryopreservation is generally offered during the transition process, this option is not feasible for all transgender women (e.g. due to incomplete spermatogenesis when initiating treatment in early puberty, in case of inability to masturbate, or when temporary cessation of hormonal treatment is too disruptive). Harvesting mature spermatozoa, or testicular tissue harboring immature germ cells, from orchiectomy specimens obtained during genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS) might give this group a chance of having biological children later in life. Previous studies on spermatogenesis in orchiectomy specimens showed conflicting results, ranging from complete absence of germ cells to full spermatogenesis, and did not involve transgender women who initiated medical treatment in early- or late puberty. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on orchiectomy specimens from 214 transgender women who underwent gGAS between 2006 and 2018. Six subgroups were identified, depending on pubertal stage at initiation of medical treatment (Tanner stage 2-3, Tanner stage 4-5, adult), and whether hormonal treatment was continued or temporarily stopped prior to gGAS in each of these groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All transgender women used a combination of estrogens and testosterone suppressing therapy. Orchiectomy specimen sections were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin and histologically analyzed to assess the Johnsen score and the ratio of most advanced germ cell types in at least 50 seminiferous tubular cross-sections. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry was used to validate these findings using spermatogonia, spermatocytes or spermatids markers (MAGE-A3/A4, γH2AX, Acrosin, respectively). Possibilities for fertility preservation were defined as: preservation of spermatozoa, preservation of spermatogonial stem cells or no possibilities (in case no germ cells were found). Outcomes were compared between subgroups and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between the duration of hormonal treatment and the possibilities for fertility preservation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mature spermatozoa were encountered in 4.7% of orchiectomy specimens, all from transgender women who had initiated medical treatment in Tanner stage 4 or higher. In 88.3% of the study sample orchiectomy specimens only contained immature germ cells (round spermatids, spermatocytes or spermatogonia, as most advanced germ cell type). In 7.0%, a complete absence of germ cells was observed, all these samples were from transgender women who had initiated medical treatment in adulthood. Cessation of hormonal treatment prior to gGAS did not affect the presence of germ cells or their maturation stage, nor was there an effect of the duration of hormonal treatment prior to gGAS. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Since data on serum hormone levels on the day of gGAS were not available, we were unable to verify if the transgender women who were asked to temporarily stop hormonal treatment 4 weeks prior to surgery actually did so, and if people with full spermatogenesis were compliant to treatment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS There may still be options for fertility preservation in orchiectomy specimens obtained during gGAS since a small percentage of transgender women had full spermatogenesis, which could enable cryopreservation of mature spermatozoa via a testicular sperm extraction procedure. Furthermore, the vast majority still had immature germ cells, which could enable cryopreservation of testicular tissue harboring spermatogonial stem cells. If maturation techniques like in vitro spermatogenesis become available in the future, harvesting germ cells from orchiectomy specimens might be a promising option for those who are otherwise unable to have biological children. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I de Nie
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C L Mulder
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Meißner
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Schut
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Holleman
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W B van der Sluis
- Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Hannema
- Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M den Heijer
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M M van Pelt
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N M van Mello
- Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Sluis WB, de Nie I, Steensma TD, van Mello NM, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Bouman MB. Surgical and demographic trends in genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender women: 40 years of experience in Amsterdam. Br J Surg 2021; 109:8-11. [PMID: 34291277 PMCID: PMC10364763 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
This was a single-centre, retrospective study of transgender women undergoing genital gender-affirming surgery. A chart study was conducted, recording individual demographics, all genital surgical procedures, and surgical techniques. Procedure incidence, techniques employed, and demographic variations over the years were analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W B van der Sluis
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I de Nie
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T D Steensma
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N M van Mello
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M-B Bouman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Nie I, Meißner A, Kostelijk EH, Soufan AT, Voorn-de Warem IAC, den Heijer M, Huirne J, van Mello NM. Impaired semen quality in trans women: prevalence and determinants. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:1529-1536. [PMID: 32613241 PMCID: PMC7368399 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the semen quality in trans women at time of fertility preservation, prior to the start of gender-affirming hormone treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER Before the start of gender-affirming hormone treatment, semen quality in trans women was already strongly decreased compared to the general population. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Hormone treatment for -trans women (birth-assigned males, female gender identity) consists of anti-androgens combined with estrogens in order to achieve feminization and it is accompanied by a loss of reproductive capability. Trans women can opt for semen cryopreservation prior to their medical transition to retain the possibility to parent genetically related offspring. Post-thaw semen parameters determine which ART can be used. Knowledge of semen quality and the factors negatively influencing semen parameters in trans women are important to improve semen quality before fertility preservation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective cohort study was performed between 1972 and 2017. In total, 260 trans women were included for this study. Due to the study design, there was no loss to follow-up or attrition. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We studied the quality of the preserved semen in trans women, prior to their medical transition, who visited our gender clinic. Semen parameters were collected, as well as data on age, alcohol consumption, smoking, cannabis use, BMI, previous use of estrogens or anti-androgens and endocrine laboratory results. Semen parameters were categorized using reference values for human semen of the World Health Organization (WHO) and compared with data from the general population. Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the extent to which factors known to have a negative impact on semen quality in the general population explained the impaired semen quality in the cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The cohort consisted of 260 trans women between the age of 16 and 52 years. Semen quality in trans women was significantly decreased compared to WHO data from the general population. In total, 21 trans women had an azoospermia and median semen parameters for the remaining trans women and the general population, respectively, were as follows: volume 2.7 and 3.2 ml (P < 0.05), sperm concentration 40 and 64 million/ml (P < 0.05), total sperm number 103 and 196 million (P < 0.05) and progressive motility 41% and 57% (P < 0.05). Smoking (odds ratio (OR) 2.35 (95% CI 1.06–5.21)) and a higher age at time of fertility preservation (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.00–1.08)) were found to correlate with an impaired progressive motility. Twelve trans women reported to have used anti-androgens and estrogens, and all had discontinued for at least 3 months prior to the first attempt for semen cryopreservation. No correlation was found between previous gender-affirming hormone use and decreased semen parameters. The median post-thaw total motile sperm count was 1.0 million per vial (interquartile range 0.1–3.1) and in only 26.4% of thawed semen samples was the quality adequate for a minimally invasive IUI. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Limitations include the retrospective design and insufficient data on transgender-specific factors, such as bringing the testes into the inguinal position (tucking), wearing tight underwear and low masturbation frequency. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Semen quality in trans women was decreased compared to the general population, which could not be explained by known risk factors, such as BMI, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, gender-affirming hormone use or abnormal endocrine laboratory results. Although a negative impact of smoking was observed, it was insufficient to explain the overall decreased semen quality in this cohort. Since low pre-freeze semen quality results in an even lower post-thaw semen quality, the majority of trans women and their female partner or surrogate may need an invasive and burdensome treatment to establish a pregnancy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) For this study, no external funding was obtained and there were no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I de Nie
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Meißner
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E H Kostelijk
- IVF Center, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A T Soufan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I A C Voorn-de Warem
- Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M den Heijer
- Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N M van Mello
- Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peters HE, Juffermans LJM, Lambalk CB, Dekker JJML, Fernhout T, Groenman FA, de Groot CJM, Hoksbergen AWJ, Huirne JAF, de Leeuw RA, van Mello NM, Nederhoed JH, Schats R, Verhoeven MO, Hehenkamp WJK. Feasibility study for performing uterus transplantation in the Netherlands. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoz032. [PMID: 32128452 PMCID: PMC7048682 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is it feasible to perform uterus transplantations (UTx) in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands? SUMMARY ANSWER Considering all ethical principles, surgical risks and financial aspects, we have concluded that at this time, it is not feasible to establish the UTx procedure at our hospital. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY UTx is a promising treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. It is currently being investigated within several clinical trials worldwide and has resulted in the live birth of 19 children so far. Most UTx procedures are performed in women with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, a congenital disorder characterized by absence of the uterus. In the Netherlands, the only possible option for these women for having children is adoption or surrogacy. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION We performed a feasibility study to search for ethical, medical and financial support for performing UTx at the Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS For this feasibility study, we created a special interest group, including gynaecologists, transplant surgeons, researchers and a financial advisor. Also, in collaboration with the patients' association for women with MRKH, a questionnaire study was performed to research the decision-making in possible recipients. In this paper, we present an overview of current practices and literature on UTx and discuss the results of our feasibility study. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A high level of interest from the possible recipients became apparent from our questionnaire amongst women with MRKH. The majority (64.8%) positively considered UTx with a live donor, with 69.6% having a potential donor available. However, this 'non-life-saving transplantation' requires careful balancing of risks and benefits. The UTx procedure includes two complex surgeries and unknown consequences for the unborn child. The costs for one UTx are calculated to be around €100 000 and will not be compensated by medical insurance. The Clinical Ethics Committee places great emphasis on the principle of non-maleficence and the 'fair distribution of health services'. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION In the Netherlands, alternatives for having children are available and future collaboration with experienced foreign clinics that offer the procedure is a possibility not yet investigated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The final assessment of this feasibility study is that that there are not enough grounds to support this procedure at our hospital at this point in time. We will closely follow the developments and will re-evaluate the feasibility in the future. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This feasibility study was funded by the VU Medical Center (Innovation grant 2017). No conflicts of interest have been reported relevant to the subject of all authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER n.a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E Peters
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L J M Juffermans
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C B Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J J M L Dekker
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T Fernhout
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F A Groenman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J M de Groot
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A W J Hoksbergen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A F Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R A de Leeuw
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N M van Mello
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Nederhoed
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Schats
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M O Verhoeven
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J K Hehenkamp
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zeadna A, Holzer H, Son WY, Demirtas E, Reinblatt S, Dahan MH, Colleselli V, D'Costa E, Wildt L, Seeber B, Kashevarova AA, Skryabin NA, Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN, Bordignon PP, Mugione A, Vanni VS, Vigano P, Papaleo E, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Amodio G, Gregori S, Guo YH, Li R, Wang LL, Chen SL, Chen X, Guo W, Ye DS, Liu YD, Renzini MM, Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Comi R, Brigante C, Caliari I, Brambillasca F, Merola M, Lain M, Turchi D, Karagouga G, Sottocornola M, Fadini R, Wekker MZ, Mol F, van Wely M, Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ, van Mello NM, Verlengia C, Alviggi E, Rampini MR, Alfano P, Pergolini I, Marconi D, Iacobelli N, Muzi MC, Gelli G, Alviggi C, Colicchia A, Herraiz-Nicuesa L, Tejera-Alhambra M, Garcia-Segovia A, Ramos-Medina R, Alonso B, Gil-Pulido J, Martin L, Caballero M, Rodriguez-Mahou M, Sanchez-Ramon S, de Jong PG, Kaandorp SP, Di Nisio M, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S, Lledo B, Turienzo A, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Ten J, Llacer J, Bernabeu R, Ramos-Medina R, Garcia-Segovia A, Gil J, Leon JA, Alonso B, Tejera-Alhambra M, Seyfferth A, Aguaron A, Alonso J, de Albornoz EC, Carbone J, Caballero P, Fernandez-Cruz E, Ortiz-Quintana L, Sanchez-Ramon S, Lou YY, Jin F, Zheng YM, Li LJ, Le F, Wang LY, Liu SY, Pan PP, Hu CX, Akoum A, Bourdiec A, Shao R, Rao CV, Scarpellini F, Sbracia M, Jancar N, Bokal EV, Ban-Frangez H, Drobnic S, Korosec S, Pinter B, Salamun V, Yamaguchi M, Honda R, Uchino K, Ohba T, Katabuchi H, Leylek O, Tiras B, Saltik AYSE, Halicigil C, Kavci N, Wiser A, Gilbert A, Nahum R, Orvieto R, Hass J, Hourvitz A, Weissman A, Younes G, Dirnfeld M, Hershko A, Shulma A, Holzer H, Shalom-Paz E, Tulandi T, O'Neill SM, Agerbo E, Kenny LC, Henriksen TB, Kearney PM, Greene RA, Mortensen PB, Khashan AS, Talaulikar VS, Bax BE, Manyonda I, Van Mello N, Mol F, Hajenius PJ, Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Wely M. Early pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
8
|
Amer S, Raffi F, Asfour V, Varma R, Polson A, Menon P, Mol F, van Mello NM, Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ, van Wely M, Cheong Y, Reading I, Sadek K, Ledger WL, Li TC. Session 47: Reproductive surgery. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
9
|
van Mello NM, Mol F, Verhoeve HR, van Wely M, Adriaanse AH, Boss EA, Dijkman AB, Bayram N, Emanuel MH, Friederich J, van der Leeuw-Harmsen L, Lips JP, Van Kessel MA, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Hajenius PJ. Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison. Hum Reprod 2012; 28:60-7. [PMID: 23081873 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the treatment success rate of systemic methotrexate (MTX) compared with expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) with low and plateauing serum hCG concentrations? SUMMARY ANSWER In women with an ectopic pregnancy or a PUL and low and plateauing serum hCG concentrations, expectant management is an alternative to medical treatment with single-dose systemic MTX. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS MTX is often used in asymptomatic women with an ectopic pregnancy or a PUL with low and plateauing serum hCG concentrations. These pregnancies may be self-limiting and watchful waiting is suggested as an alternative, but evidence from RCTs is lacking. The results of this RCT show that expectant management is an alternative to treatment with systemic MTX in a single-dose regimen in these women. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A multicentre RCT women were assigned to systemic MTX (single dose) treatment or expectant management, using a web-based randomization program, block randomization with stratification for hospital and serum hCG concentration (<1000 versus 1000-2000 IU/l). The primary outcome measure was an uneventful decline of serum hCG to an undetectable level (<2 IU/l) by the initial intervention strategy. Secondary outcome measures included additional treatment, side effects and serum hCG clearance time. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS From April 2007 to January 2012, we performed a multicentre study in The Netherlands. All haemodynamically stable women >18 years old with both an ectopic pregnancy visible on transvaginal sonography and a plateauing serum hCG concentration <1500 IU/l or with a PUL and a plateauing serum hCG concentration <2000 IU/l were eligible for the trial. MAIN RESULTS We included 73 women of whom 41 were allocated to single-dose MTX and 32 to expectant management. There was no difference in primary treatment success rate of single-dose MTX versus expectant management, 31/41 (76%) and 19/32 (59%), respectively [relative risk (RR) 1.3 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.8]. In nine women (22%), additional MTX injections were needed, compared with nine women (28%) in whom systemic MTX was administered after initial expectant management (RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.4-1.7). One woman (2%) from the MTX group underwent surgery compared with four women (13%) in the expectant management group (RR 0.2; 95% CI 0.02-1.7), all after experiencing abdominal pain within the first week of follow-up. In the MTX group, nine women reported side effects versus none in the expectant management group. No serious adverse events were reported. Single-dose systemic MTX does not have a larger treatment effect compared with expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or a PUL and low and plateauing serum hCG concentrations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Sixty percent of women after expectant management had an uneventful clinical course with steadily declining serum hCG levels without any intervention, which means that MTX, a potentially harmful drug, can be withheld in these women. BIAS, LIMITATION AND GENERALISABILITY: A limitation of this RCT is that it was an open (not placebo controlled) trial. Nevertheless, introduction of bias was probably limited by the strict criteria to be fulfilled for treatment with MTX. STUDY FUNDING This trial is supported by a grant of the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw Clinical fellow grant 90700154). TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 48210491.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N M van Mello
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Mello NM, Mol F, Horne AW, Abidin HBZ, Adin ZEHA, Boswell L, Brown JK, Burgess S, Lee KF, Duncan WC, Akhtar M, Oktem O, Mercan R, Alper E, Salar Z, Balaban B, Urman B. SESSION 50: EARLY PREGNANCY - NEW EVIDENCE. Hum Reprod 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/27.s2.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Musters AM, de Bekker-Grob EW, Mochtar MH, van der Veen F, van Mello NM. Women's perspectives regarding subcutaneous injections, costs and live birth rates in IVF. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:2425-31. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
12
|
Mol F, van den Boogaard E, van Mello NM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van Zonneveld P, Dijkman AB, Verhoeve HR, Mozes A, Goddijn M, Hajenius PJ. Guideline adherence in ectopic pregnancy management. Hum Reprod 2010; 26:307-15. [PMID: 21127354 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based guidelines have been issued for ectopic pregnancy (EP), covering both diagnostic and therapeutic management. In general, guidelines aim to reduce practice variation and to improve quality of care. To assess the guideline adherence in the management of EP, we developed guideline-based quality indicators and measured patient care in various hospitals. METHODS A panel of experts and clinicians developed quality indicators based on recommendations from the Dutch guideline on EP management, using the systematic RAND-modified Delphi method. With these indicators, patient care was assessed in six Dutch hospitals between January 2003 and December 2005. For each quality indicator, a ratio for guideline adherence was calculated. Overall adherence was reported, as well as adherence per hospital type, i.e. academic, teaching and non-teaching hospitals. RESULTS Out of 30 guideline-based recommendations, 12 quality indicators were selected covering procedural, structural and outcome aspects of care. For 317 women surgically treated for EP, these aspects were assessed. Overall adherence to the guideline was 75%. The highest adherence (98%) was observed for performing transvaginal sonography during the diagnostic workup. The lowest adherence (21%) was observed for performing salpingotomy in case of contra-lateral tubal pathology. Wide variance in adherence (0-100%) existed between academic, teaching and non-teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS The overall guideline adherence was reasonable, with ample room for improvement in various aspects of care. Further research should focus on the barriers for guideline dissemination and adherence, to further improve the management of EP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mol
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|