The influence of comorbidities and etiologies on the success of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic soft tissue wounds: midterm results

[Focused High-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for Bone healing Disorders of the Forearm and the Hand]

BACKGROUND

ESWT is a non-surgical treatment option but can also be used in addition to surgical treatment (stabilisation, freshening, defect filling, removal of discomforting osteosynthesis material) for the treatment of delayed bone healing (DBH) and non-union (NU). Its value as well as influencing factors on the upper extremity have not been adequately quantified so far.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty cases were retrospectively studied after application of focused high-energy ESWT with regard to healing rate and consolidation time. The influence of age, location, time of treatment and treatment prior to and concurrent with ESWT were analysed.

RESULTS

In 70% of the cases, healing occurred after a median of 2.4 months (DBH) and 2.8 months (NU). The median age of healed (DBH 44 y., non-union 35 y.) and non-healed (DBH 51 y., NU 37 y.) did not differ significantly. The time between trauma/surgery and ESWT was 4.2 months for DBH in healed and 3.7 months in non-healed without a significant difference, and 27 months for NU in both healed and non-healed. Age and smoking status also had no influence. The healing rate was highest at metacarpal bone/finger/thumb (91%), followed by forearm shaft (88%), epiphysis/metaphysis of the forearm (67%), and, lastly, carpal bones (59%). After conservative pre-treatment, 55% healed, compared with 67% after more than two previous surgeries, 73% without any pre-treatment, and 75% after one previous surgery. Further analysis of surgical pre-treatment showed 85% healing after ORIF alone, 64% without previous surgery, and 57% healing after ORIF with bone grafting/debridement. Intraoperative ESWT combined with bone debridement/transplantation and ORIF resulted in 67% healing, compared with 86% in combination with ORIF alone. ESWT alone or with only minimal measures (removal of osteosynthesis material) led to 70% consolidation.

CONCLUSION

ESWT is equally effective at any stage of a bone healing disorder. The principles of stability and filling of bone defects must also be taken into account when using ESWT; then ESWT alone or combined with surgery is equally effective. The negative influence of bone defects/resorption is still detectable even with ESWT. Furthermore, treatment of the scaphoid is more problematic compared with other locations. Previous surgery is not a negative factor, even with osteosynthesis material in situ.

Is Shock Wave Application Effective on Various Chronic Wounds in the Geriatric Population? Preliminary Clinical Study

Purpose

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a beneficial adjunct modality for chronic wounds. Limited research has been conducted on pressure ulcers (PUs), while the majority of studies have focused on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs). This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of radial ESWT in older adults with chronic wounds.

Patients and Methods

This study involved a total of 31 wounds: PUs (n=22), VLUs (n=7), and DFUs (n=2). A single radial ESWT was performed with 300 + 100 shocks per cm2, pressure of 2.5 bar, energy of 0.15 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 5 Hz. Assessments using digital planimetry and clinical methods, utilizing the Wound Bed Score (WBS) and the Bates-Jansen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) were performed before the radial ESWT application (M0) and one week after (M1).

Results

A significant wound decrease in planimetry was noted (pre-ESWT vs post-ESWT), with wound area from 9.4 cm2 to 6.2 cm2, length from 6.4 cm to 3.9 cm, and width from 2.8 cm to 2.1 cm (p<0.001). Additionally, a substantial clinical improvement was noted in both the WBS with a 31.25% increase and the BWAT with a 20.00% increase (p<0.001). It was also found a significant correlation between the planimetric and clinical outcomes for both tools: WBS (r=-0.446, p=0.012) and BWAT (r=0.327, p=0.073).

Conclusion

The ESWT application yields substantial immediate clinical effects that support the healing of chronic wounds in older adults. Even a single ESWT session can prove to be clinically effective and beneficial in the management of chronic wounds.

Electromechanical therapy in diabetic foot ulcers patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most devastating and troublesome consequences of diabetes. The current therapies are not always effective because of the complicated aetiology and interactions of local and systemic components in DFU. However, adjunctive therapy (electromechanical therapy) has become the latest modality in recent years, although there is a lack of significant research to support its utilization as a treatment standard. The purpose of this systematic research was to review the literature on the application of electromechanical therapies in the healing of DFUs.

Methods

For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Medline, EmBase, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar for the most current research (1990-2022) on electromechanical therapies for DFUs. We used the PICO method (where P is population, I is intervention, C is comparator/control, and O is outcome for our study) to establish research question with the terms [Electromechanical therapy OR Laser therapy OR photo therapy OR Ultrasound therapy OR Shockwave therapy] AND [diabetic foot ulcers OR diabetes] were used as search criteria. Searches were restricted to English language articles only. Whereas, Cochrane handbook of "Systematic Reviews of Interventions" with critical appraisal for medical and health sciences checklist for systematic review was used for risk of bias assessment. There were 39 publications in this study that were deemed to be acceptable. All the suitably selected studies include 1779 patients.

Results

The meta-analysis of 15 included research articles showed the overall effect was significant (P = 0.0002) thus supporting experimental groups have improvement in the DFUs healing in comparison to the control group.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed electromechanical treatments are significantly viable options for patients with DFUs. Electromechanical therapy can considerably reduce treatment ineffectiveness, accelerate healing, and minimize the time it takes for complete ulcer healing.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01240-2.

The Immediate Clinical Effects Following a Single Radial Shock Wave Therapy in Pressure Ulcers: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial of The SHOWN Project

OBJECTIVE

Recent preliminary reports indicate that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) might be useful for chronic wounds, especially venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). However, there is limited evidence for the utility and safety of ESWT in pressure ulcers (PUs). Therefore, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to assess immediate planimetric and clinical effects following a single radial ESWT session in PUs.

APPROACH

A group of 40 patients with PUs was randomly assigned into two groups: active ESWT (n=20), which underwent a single treatment with radial ESWT (300+100 impulses per 1 cm2, 2.5 bars, 0.15 mJ/mm2, and 5 Hz) and placebo ESWT (n=20) which was exposed to sham-radial ESWT. All patients continued standard wound care procedures. The planimetric assessment and clinical outcomes using Wound Bed Score (WBS) and Bates-Jansen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) were assessed before (M0) and after ESWT sessions (M1).

RESULTS

There was a significant planimetric enhancement observed after active ESWT reported as a reduction in all metric parameters: wound area from 11.51 cm2 to 8.09 cm2 (p<0.001), wound length from 4.97 cm to 4.41 cm (p<0.001), and wound width from 3.15 cm to 2.49 cm (p<0.0001). Also, there was a significant beneficial clinical improvement observed with a WBS as an increased score from 3.85 to 9.65 points (p<0.001) and with the BWAT as a decreased score from 45.45 to 30.70 points (p<0.001). In turn, a regression in the placebo ESWT group was observed in all studied outcomes.

INNOVATION

This study is the first RCT to provide the positive and immediate clinical effects of radial ESWT in promoting the healing of PUs.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary RCT showed that even a single session of ESWT is a promising and clinically effective modality in managing PUs. However, there is still limited data regarding the usefulness of ESWT in PUs, and further studies are in demand.

Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Waves on Microcirculation and Angiogenesis in the in vivo Wound Model of the Diver Box

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal shock waves (ESWs) have been shown to have a positive effect on skin wound healing; however, little is known on the regeneration of the microcirculation and angiogenesis as well as the different application modes.

METHODS

A total of 40 BALB/c mice were provided with dorsal skin fold chambers and were divided into 3 therapy groups (n = 30) and one control group (n = 10). The 3 therapy groups were treated with shock waves at different pulse rates (500-1,000 pulses/min) and application frequencies (day 0 and day 6 or day 0 only). Photographic documentation and intravital microscopy were carried out on day 1, 2, 4, and 6 after wounding.

RESULTS

Using the newly developed Diver Box, shock waves could be applied in vivo without mechanical tissue damage. Shock wave therapy to skin wounds demonstrated to induce faster wound closure rates in the beginning than controls in groups with higher pulse rates and frequencies of the shock waves. Furthermore, the regeneration of microcirculation and perfusion in the healing skin was significantly improved after the application of, in particular, higher pulse rates as given by increased numbers of perfused capillaries and functional vessel density. The study of inflammation showed, especially in high-pulse ESW groups, higher leukocyte counts, and rolling leukocytes over time until day 6 as a response to the induction of inflammatory reaction after ESW application. Angiogenesis showed a marked increase in positive areas as given by sprouts, coils, and recruitments in all ESW groups, especially between days 4 and 6.

CONCLUSION

The major findings of this trial demonstrate that ESW therapy to skin wounds is effective and safe. This is demonstrated by the initially faster wound closure rate, but later the same wound closure rate in the treatment groups than in controls. Furthermore, during the regeneration of microcirculation and perfusion in the healing skin, a significant improvement was observed after the application of, in particular, higher ESW pulse rates, suggesting an ESW-related increase in nutrient and oxygen supply in the wound tissue.

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and conventional wound therapy (CWT) for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds. All English-language articles on ESWT for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds indexed in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and HealthSTAR published prior to June 2017 were included, as well as corresponding articles cited in reference lists of related review articles. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool. Study design, subject demographics, wound aetiology, treatment protocols, assessment indexes, and follow-up duration were extracted. The fixed or random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect sizes according to studies' heterogeneity. Ten randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 473 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that ESWT statistically significantly increased the healing rate of acute and chronic soft tissue wounds 2.73-fold (odds ratio, OR = 3.73, 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.30-6.04, P < .001) and improved wound-healing area percentage by 30.45% (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 30.45; 95% CI: 23.79-37.12; P < .001). ESWT reduced wound-healing time by 3 days (SMD = -2.86, 95% CI:-3.78 to -1.95, P < .001) for acute soft tissue wounds and 19 days (SMD = -19.11, 95% CI: -23.74 to -14.47, P < .001) for chronic soft tissue wounds and the risk of wound infection by 53% (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.92, P = .03) when compared with CWT alone. Serious adverse effects were not reported. ESWT showed better therapeutic effects on acute and chronic soft tissue wounds compared with CWT alone. However, higher-quality and well-controlled RCTs are needed to further assess the role of ESWT for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic wound of lower extremity: current perspective and systematic review

The purpose of this study was to provide an up-to-date review for the accurate estimation of the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on the healing of chronic wounds on the lower extremity (CWLE). A systematic review of 10 databases for clinical trials about ESWT in the management of CWLE published between 2000 and 2016 was performed. A total of 11 studies with 925 patients were found. Expert therapists assessed the methodological qualities of the selected studies using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and categorised each study according to Sackett's levels of evidence. Eight studies were categorised as level II; two studies were categorised as level III and one study was categorised as level V. In conclusion, this review demonstrated mild to moderate evidence to support the use of ESWT as an adjuvant therapy with a standardised wound care programme. However, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy of ESWT. So, future researches with high methodological quality are required to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this relatively new physical therapy application.

Defocused Shock Wave Therapy for Chronic Soft Tissue Wounds in the Lower Limbs: A Pilot Study

Chronic soft tissue wounds of the lower limbs are debilitating, painful and often unresponsive to advanced dressing treatments. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) could represent an alternative treatment. Ten patients with chronic soft tissue wounds of the legs, unresponsive to advanced dressing treatments for more than 3 mo, underwent three defocused ESWT sessions at 72-h intervals. In every session, the sum of 300 standard pulses + 100 pulses per square centimeter was applied at 0.15 mJ/mm² and 4 Hz over the edge of the wound. The wound size in square centimeters, Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and visual analogue scale were used as outcome measures. A significant reduction in wound size and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and visual analogue scale values from pre-treatment to 90 d was observed. Seven of ten ulcers healed completely and nine of ten patients reported complete pain relief. Defocused ESWT represents a non-invasive, feasible strategy for difficult-to-treat soft tissue wounds of the lower limbs.

Extracorporeal shock wave treatment improves incisional wound healing in diabetic rats

Impaired wound healing in surgical patients with diabetes increases the incidence of infection, prolongs hospitalization, and even increases the rate of mortality. Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) was reported to accelerate chronic wound healing by promoting revascularization and tissue regeneration; however, it is not known if ESWT could also improve healing of acute surgical incisional wounds in diabetes. In this study, using a rat model of diabetes, we investigated the effect of low-energy ESWT on collagen content in wound tissues and its efficacy in incisional wound healing. A single dorsal incisional wound was inflicted in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, and they received ESWT at different time post-wounding. Rats were sacrificed on days 7 and 14 post-wounding. Wound breaking strength, hydroxyproline content, histological characteristics and the expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) were analyzed. As a result, the wound breaking strength was significantly enhanced and the hydroxyproline content in wound tissues was increased at each time point examined. The number of fibroblasts was signicantly increased, and the new collagen fibers were more abundant at the wound site after ESWT. Furthermore, the expression of TGF-β1 was up-regulated after ESWT on day 7 post-wounding. These results suggest that low-energy ESWT can increase collagen content, enhance wound breaking strength and improve the healing of incisional wound in diabetic rats. The increased collagen content may be attributed, at least in part, to the up-regulation of TGF-β1 expression in wound tissues.