Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution

Percutaneous management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques has revolutionized the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Patients can now undergo successful UPJO repair without the morbidity and complications associated with open surgery. Laparoscopic and robotic repair has supplanted open surgery as the gold standard, but percutaneous endoscopic treatment remains a relevant alternative to more invasive surgery. This review will focus on the percutaneous approach for the treatment of UPJO.

RECENT FINDINGS

Percutaneous endopyelotomy was popularized during the 1980 s due to advances in the field of endourology, allowing for well tolerated and reliable percutaneous access to the kidney. After percutaneous access to the kidney is achieved, the narrowed ureter at the UPJ is incised in a full thickness fashion in the posterolateral position from the ureteral lumen to the periureteral fat. Success rates for this procedure are nearly 90% at high-volume centres. The ideal patient who has success with percutaneous endopyelotomy has a short segment of narrowing less than 2 cm, no crossing vessel, good ipsilateral renal function and mild hydronephrosis.

SUMMARY

Although the development of laparoscopic and robotic approaches to pyeloplasty has produced outcomes that surpass those of percutaneous endopyelotomy, it remains a viable option in the appropriately selected patient, but success rates tend to decrease with longer follow up.

[Laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via nephroscope for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via nephroscope in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with renal calculi.

METHODS

From June 2016 to January 2022, eight patients including five males and three females underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via 19.5F(1F≈0.33 mm) nephroscope in Peking University People' s Hospital. The age ranged from 23-51 years (mean: 40.5 years) and the body mass index (BMI) ranged from 18.8-32.4 kg/m² (mean 27.0 kg/m²). The lesion located on the left side in all of the eight patients. Two patients had solitary kidney and one patient had horseshoe kidney. Solitary stone was seen in one patient and the other seven patients suffered multiple stones, with two patients had staghorn stones. The largest diameter of stones ranged from 0.6-2.5 cm (mean: 1.5 cm). CT or ultrasound showed that moderate nephrosis was seen in five patients and severe nephrosis was seen in three patients. During surgery, after exposure of renal pelvis and proximal ureter, a small incision of 1.5 cm was performed in the anterior wall of the renal pelvis, and a 19.5F nephroscope was introduced into renal pelvis through laparoscopic trocar and renal pelvis incision. Stones were fragmented and sucked out by 3.3 mm ultrasonic probe placed through nephroscope. After stones were removed, modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performed.

RESULTS

Surgery was successfully completed in all of the eight patients without conversion to open surgery. The operation time ranged from 160-254 min (mean 213 min) and the time of nephroscopic management time was 25-40 min (mean: 33 min). The hemoglobin was decreased by 3-21 g/L (mean: 10.3 g/L). The stone-free rate was 75% (6/8 cases), stones were incompletely removed in two patients due to abnormal intrarenal structure. The modified Clavien classification system (MCCS) grade ⅢA complication occurred in one patient postoperatively, which was nephrosis due to intrarenal bleeding, and nephrostomy was performed. With the mean follow-up of 30 months (ranged from 2-68 months), there was no evidence of obstruction in all the patients, and one patient underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat residual calculi.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via 19.5F nephroscope is feasible and safe, and could be a complementary method to treat UPJO and renal calculi.

Concomitant Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Complicated by Renal Calculi with Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Pyelolithotomy via 19.5F Rigid Nephroscope: A Report of 12 Cases

OBJECTIVE

To introduce our experience of concomitant laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and pyelolithotomy via 19.5 F rigid nephroscope to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) complicated with renal calculi.

METHODS

The data of 42 patients with UPJO who underwent LP from June 2016 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients with ipsilateral renal calculi underwent LP and concomitant pyelolithotomy via 19.5 F rigid nephroscope. Perioperative data of this group were compared with other 12 matched patients without calculi who underwent LP only.

RESULTS

Of 12 patients with renal calculi, only 4 patients had simple stone and the other 8 patients suffered complex stones. Anatomical solitary kidney was found in 2 patients. The mean diameter of the largest stone was 1.1 cm (ranged from 0.6 to 1.7). The mean operative time was 171 min, the mean time of nephroscopic management was 17.2 min, 7 patients received pyelolithotomy by forceps, 3 patients received pyelolithotomy and ultrasonic lithotripsy, 1 patient received ultrasonic lithotripsy, the mean number of stones retrieved was 8.9 (ranged from 0-53), in one case the calculus was inaccessible because it was located in a narrow neck caliceal diverticulum. Overall stone-free rate was 91.7% (11/12). No difference in operative time, postoperative hemoglobin drop, postoperative hospital stay and incidence of complications was observed between the 2 groups. At the mean follow-up of 17.9 months, no patients had obstruction or recurrent stones.

CONCLUSION

LP and concomitant pyelolithotomy via 19.5 F rigid nephroscope is a safe and feasible option to treat UPJO with renal calculi, with acceptable success rate and stone-free rate.

Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

INTRODUCTION

The management of recurrent pyeloureteral junction obstruction (PUJO) is controversial, as there is no suitable technique for its correction. Percutaneous endopyelotomy shows better results in recurrent PUJO compared to primary PUJO. Micro-percutaneous approaches reduce damage to renal parenchyma and facilitate access to renal pelvis.

OBJETIVE

To present our experience in the use of this minimally invasive technique for the treatment of recurrent PUJO.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed collecting data of patients with recurrent PUJO treated in our hospital using the percutaneous approach between July 2014 and January 2018. Micropercutaneous access was performed in all patients. In Valdivia position, a 5 or 6 mm high-pressure ballon is placed in the renal pelvis under cystoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The 4.8 or 8 Fr microperc puncture needle is placed into the pelvicalyceal system. Endopyelotomy is performed with a laser fiber or monopolar hook on a high-pressure balloon. To improve the exposure of the cutting area, the high-pressure balloon is placed at the pyeloureteral junction. Double J stent is left for weeks.

RESULTS

The ages of the patients were 4, 8 and 18 months, and 2 and 4 years. All patients had previously undergone pyeloplasty due to pyeloureteral junction obstruction. Operative time was 50 ± 21 min. Hospital stay after surgery was 24 h and hematuria disappeared within the 24 postoperative hours.

DISCUSSION

The number of patients with recurrent PUJO is small, making it difficult to establish a standard surgical approach for failed pyeloplasty. Redo pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard by some authors but alternative methods, such as endourological techniques, may also have a role in the treatment of failed pyeloplasty. The percutaneous approach has shown very good results in this treatment and the miniaturization of percutaneous surgery has improved with the micropercutaneus access. We consider micropercutaneous approach helped with a high pressure balloon in the pyeloureteral junction is an alternative and minimally invasive technique that has shown good results in our small cases series. However, we must take into account the limitation of the study considering the low number of patients. We need prospective studies to support our results.

CONCLUSION

Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy is a fairly effective technique to treat recurrent UPJO after failed pyeloplasty in children. In our experience, it reduces kidney damage without increasing complications.

Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy and compare results with a cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without pyelolithotomy.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of 43 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty between December 2012 and July 2018 at our department. Eighteen patients (42%) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. The results of patients with renal stones were compared with 25 matched patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without concomitant renal stones. Demographic data, operative and stone parameters were compared between the groups.

Results

The groups were similar regarding to demographic characteristics. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. In 3 cases without renal stones and 15 cases with renal stones, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean stone size was 13±5.24 mm, and the median number of stones was 1 (1-18). The success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without pyelolithotomy was 93.3% and 92.9%, respectively, as confirmed by negative diuretic renogram at postoperative 3rd months. Overall stone-free rate after laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was 93.3%. Mean operative time was 222.6765.71 minutes vs. 219.11±75.63 minutes for the pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy vs. pyeloplasty, respectively (p=0.88).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective intervention with associated good cosmetic results and high stone-free rates without significant increase in operative time or complications.

Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) has excellent surgical safety and efficacy in primary pyeloplasty. In recent, the application of robotics has explored to more complex surgical conditions such as failed pyeloplasty. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the surgical and clinical outcomes of secondary RLP compared with primary RLP. Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out an extensive literature search in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar to extract the published articles comparing primary vs. secondary RLP up to April 2019. Interested surgical and clinical outcomes were extracted from each study and then used RevMan 5.3 Software for meta-analysis comparison. Furthermore, the quality of each study was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Our search has yielded seven studies that met our inclusion criteria. These studies contained 613 vs. 107 patients in primary vs. secondary RLP, respectively. Using random effect model, the analysis showed no statistical difference between the groups in the presence of a crossing vessel, complications, length of hospital stays (LOS), and follow-up period. However, the operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and recurrence rate were significantly higher in the secondary RLP compared with primary RLP (p = 0.004), (p = 0.01), and (p = 0.04), respectively. Our results indicate that secondary RLP is associated with significantly increased operative time and EBL and higher recurrence rates compared with primary RLP. We believe that our findings might help surgeon's decision making in patient selection and consultation during redo pyeloplasty surgical planning.

Forming a stone in pelviureteric junction obstruction: Cause or effect?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a possible causal relationship for stone formation in pelviureteric junction obstruction and to outline management options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search and evidence synthesis was conducted via electronic databases in the English language using the key words pelviureteric junction obstruction; urolithiasis; hyperoxaluria; laparoscopic pyeloplasty; flexible nephroscopy; percutaneous nephrolithotomy, alone or in combination. Relevant articles were analysed to extract conclusions.

RESULTS

Concomitant pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) and renal lithiasis has been reported only scarcely in the literature. Although PUJO has been extensively studied throughout the years, the presence of calculi in such a patient has not received equal attention and there is still doubt surrounding the pathophysiology and global management.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic risk factors appear to play an important role, enough to justify metabolic evaluation in these patients. Urinary stasis and infection are well known factors predisposing to lithiasis and contribute to some extent. The choice for treatment is not always straightforward. Management should be tailored according to degree of obstruction, renal function, patient symptoms and stone size. Simultaneous treatment is feasible with the aid of minimally invasive operative techniques and laparoscopy in particular.

Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic dismembered pyeloplasty for the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, a total of 56 patients underwent conventional open (Group 1; n=25), laparoscopic (Group 2; n=16), and robotic (Group 3; n=15) dismembered pyeloplasty operations. Preoperative evaluation was performed using urinalysis, urine culture, blood biochemistry, urinary ultra-sound, intravenous pyelogram (IVP) (optional) and Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renal scan. The mean operation time, estimated blood loss, drain removal time, narcotic analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay and functional outcomes were compared among groups. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software, and statistically significant differences were determined using a p value <0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 30 years in Group 1, 34.3 years in Group 2 and 32.9 years in Group 3. The mean operation time was 127, 130 and 114 min (p=0.32), and the estimated blood loss was 105, 31 and 28 mL, respectively (p=0.001). The drain was removed after 4.36 (±1.3), 2.33 (±0.6) and 1.8 (±0.6) days after surgery (p<0.001), and the mean hospital stay was 4.14 (±1.8), 2.8 (±0.75) and 2 (±1) days, respectively (p<0.001). Narcotic analgesic requirement was significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Groups 2 and 3 (p=0.02). The radiographic and symptomatic success rates were 96% in Group 1, 93.75% in Group 2 and 93.3% in Group 3.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty are feasible, effective, reliable and minimally invasive treatment approaches for the treatment of UPJO as compared with open dismembered pyeloplasty.

Long-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Purpose

To assess the long-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-five patients (mean age, 43.8 years) who underwent standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty by transperitoneal approaches were enrolled in this study. The chief complaint was flank pain (n=57 patients); the remaining cases were detected incidentally. Twenty-three patients had undergone previous abdominal surgeries, including open pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy. Mean stricture length was 1.06 cm. Grade 3/4 and 4/4 hydronephrosis was detected in 36 and 14 patients, respectively. An obstructive pattern was present on the renal scan in 53 patients (81.5%).

Results

Fifty-seven patients were treated with dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty and eight patients with Fenger pyeloplasty. During the operation, crossing vessels were found in 27 patients (41.5%). Mean operating time was 159.42 minutes. Although there were no cases of open conversion, two patients with colon and spleen injuries were detected postoperatively. The mean starting time of postoperative ambulation and diet was 1.54 days and 1.86 days, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 8.09 days. Mean follow-up period was 36.5 months. Follow-up intravenous pyelography and renal scan showed improvements in 59 patients, and the radiologic success rate was 90.8%. Eight patients showed failure on radiologic or symptomatic evaluation, and the overall success rate was 87.7%. In the comparative analysis between the success and failure groups, drained amount was the only risk factor related to failure (554.41 mL. vs. 947.70 mL, p=0.024).

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up results support laparoscopic pyeloplasty as the standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Drained amount is a risk factor for failure of the operation.

Simultaneous laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal lithiasis: the combined experience of two academic centers and review of the literature

Introduction

Approximately one out of five patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) present lithiasis in the same setting. We present our outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic management of UPJO and pelvic or calyceal lithiasis and review the current literature.

Methods

Thirteen patients, with a mean age of 42.8±13.3 years were diagnosed with UPJO and pelvic or calyceal lithiasis. All patients were subjected to laparoscopic dismembered Hynes–Anderson pyeloplasty along with removal of single or multiple stones, using a combination of laparoscopic graspers, irrigation, and flexible nephroscopy with nitinol baskets.

Results

The mean operative time was 218.8±66 minutes. In two cases, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean diameter of the largest stone was 0.87±0.25 cm and the mean number of stones retrieved was 8.2 (1–32). Eleven out of 13 patients (84.6%) were rendered stone-free. Complications included prolonged urine output from the drain in one case (Clavien grade I) and urinoma formation requiring drainage in another case (Clavien grade IIIa). The mean postoperative follow-up was 30.2 (7–51) months. No patient has experienced stone or UPJO recurrence.

Conclusion

Laparoscopy for the management of UPJO along with renal stone removal seems a very appealing treatment, with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Concomitant renal stones do not affect the outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, at least in the midterm. According to our results and the latest literature data, we advocate laparoscopic management as the treatment of choice for these cases.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To present our long-term results with the Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty, performed by a single surgeon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between August 1999 and December 2009, 79 patients (80 procedures) were operated for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We use the Anderson-Hynes technique by a transperitoneal approach. Patients were evaluated with Ultrasound, Excretory urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy (Mag-3). The perioperative characteristics, complications and results were reviewed.

RESULTS

We performed 80 laparoscopic pyeloplasties in 79 patients. Mean operative time was 93.2 minutes (60-180). Crossing vessels were found in 38 of 82 (46.3%) renal units. Kidney abnormalities occurred in 4 patients (1 double ureteropelvic system, one associated retrocaval ureter, 1 horseshoe kidney and one pelvic kidney). Complications occurred in 5 procedures (6.5%): an immediately postoperative bleeding (Clavien 3b), 1 cecal volvulus (Clavien 3b), 1 urosepsis (Clavien 4th) and 1 urinary fistula (Clavien 3a). In this series there was neither mortality nor conversion to open surgery There was recurrence in 3 out of 80 patients (3.7%). They were resolved as follows: 1 percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy, 1 secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 1 robotic pyeloplasty. There was a 96.3%. of primary overall success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that laparoscopic pyeloplasty compares favorably with the result achieved by open surgery. We believe that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a good surgical alternative for the management of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Concomitant treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi with robotic laparoscopic surgery and rigid nephroscopy

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and concomitant calculus poses a technically challenging situation. We present our experience with using rigid nephroscopy for renal calculi removal during robot-assisted pyeloplasy (RAP) for UPJO.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

From December 2010 to November 2012, 25 patients with UPJO had RAP at our institution; 9 of those had concurrent renal calculi, which were simultaneously treated with rigid nephroscopy. For stone extraction, a rigid ureteroscope was passed through an assistant trocar under laparoscopic vision directly into a previously created pyelotomy. The stones were extracted using a rigid grasper or stone basket through the rigid ureteroscope. For the removal of the stones within the upper and lower calyces, the rigid ureteroscope was introduced into the incised renal pelvis through robotic trocars if the "assistant trocar" route failed. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 8 of 9 patients. Residual calculi in 1 patient were removed with a single session of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. At the mean follow-up of 10.2 months, no patients had obstruction or recurrent stones. The mean operative time was 187.1 minutes, which was 40.9 minutes longer than the mean operative time in patients without renal calculi. There was no significant difference in blood loss, hospital stay, complications, and success rates between patients with and without renal calculi.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the use of a concomitant rigid nephroscope and RAP is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of UPJO complicated with renal calculi.

The use of a biological model for comparing two techniques of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous puncture: A randomised cross-over study

Objectives

To develop a new and inexpensive model for training in fluoroscopic puncture into the pelvicalyceal system, and to use this model to compare the learning curve of two fluoroscopic techniques, the ‘eye of the needle’ (EN) and triangulation techniques.

Materials and methods

For the trial we used a commercial plastic model (a shop-window mannequin) in which a bovine kidney, embedded in sponge with a spatial orientation similar to the human, was inserted into the model. The ureter of the animal kidney was connected to contrast fluid. Ten residents and interns were randomised into two groups; group A started the puncture using the EN technique, each member making five attempts, and then five attempts using the triangulation technique, and group B started with triangulation and then used the EN technique.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques for the mean (SD) number of trials to make a correct puncture, at 2.68 (1.00) in the EN technique and 2.86 (1.05) in the triangulation technique, or for the duration of each trial, at 523 (189) s for the EN technique and 578 (175) s for the triangulation technique. The fluoroscopy time was less in the EN technique, at 113.9 (48.9) s than for the triangulation method, at 135.8 (42.4) (P < 0.005).

Conclusions

The model was easy to construct and feasible for training. Both techniques had a similar learning curve, with higher fluoroscopy exposure for the triangulation technique.

Ureteral obstruction swine model through laparoscopy and single port for training on laparoscopic pyeloplasty

This study aims firstly to assess the most adequate surgical approach for the creation of an ureteropelvic juntion obstruction (UPJO) animal model, and secondly to validate this model for laparoscopic pyeloplasty training among urologists. Thirty six Large White pigs (28.29±5.48 Kg) were used. The left ureteropelvic junction was occluded by means of an endoclip. According to the surgical approach for model creation, pigs were randomized into: laparoscopic conventional surgery (LAP) or single port surgery (LSP). Each group was further divided into transperitoneal (+T) or retroperitoneal (+R) approach. Time needed for access, surgical field preparation, wound closure, and total surgical times were registered. Social behavior, tenderness to the touch and wound inflammation were evaluated in the early postoperative period. After ten days, all animals underwent an Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty carried out by 9 urologists, who subsequently assessed the model by means of a subjective validation questionnaire. Total operative time was significantly greater in LSP+R (p=0.001). Tenderness to the touch was significantly increased in both retroperitoneal approaches, (p=0.0001). Surgeons rated the UPJO porcine model for training on laparoscopic pyeloplasty with high or very high scores, all above 4 on a 1-5 point Likert scale. Our UPJO animal model is useful for laparoscopic pyeloplasty training. The model created by retroperitoneal single port approach presented the best score in the subjective evaluation, whereas, as a whole, transabdominal laparoscopic approach was preferred.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: outcomes for primary and secondary repairs, a single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Robotic Pyeloplasty (RAP) is a technique for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of RAP for primary and secondary (after failed primary treatment) UPJO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single institution data of adult RAP performed from 2007 to 2009 was collected retrospectively following approval by our IRB. Database analysis included patient age, race, pre and post-operative imaging studies and perioperative variables including operative time, blood loss, pain and complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-five adult patients underwent RAP (26 left/29 right) for UPJO including 9 secondary procedures from 2007 to 2009. Average follow-up was 16 months (1-36). Mean age was 41 years (18-71) with an average BMI of 27 (17-42); 32 were female. Most patients were diagnosed with preoperative diuretic renal scintigraphy and the obstructed side demonstrated mean function of 41% and t1/2 of 70 minutes. Mean operative time was 194 minutes with average blood loss less than 100 mL. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days with an average narcotic equivalent dose of 15 mg. RAP for secondary UPJO took longer with more blood loss and had a lower success rate. Failure was defined as the need of another procedure due to persistent pain and/or obstruction after diuretic renal imaging. One patient (2%) with primary UPJO failed and 2 patients (22%) with secondary UPJO failed. One major complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

RAP is a good option for the treatment of patients with UPJO. Reported series have established that endopyelotomy has inferior success rate for the treatment of primary UPJO which compromises the success of subsequent treatment as demonstrated in our higher failure rate with secondary UPJO repair.

Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty

Pyeloplasty is the gold standard therapy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Robotic assisted pyeloplasty has been widely adopted by urologists with and without prior laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience. However, difficult situations encountered during robotic assisted pyeloplasty can significantly add to the difficulty of the operation. This paper provides tips for patient positioning, port placement, robot docking, and intraoperative dissection and repair in patients with the difficult situations of obesity, large floppy liver, difficult to reflect colon (transmesenteric pyeloplasty), crossing vessels, large calculi, and previous attempts at ureteropelvic junction repair. Techniques presented in this paper may aid in the successful completion of robotic assisted pyeloplasty in the face of the difficult situations noted above.

Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology

This paper is a systematic review of the current literature in minimally invasive reconstructive urological surgery. It focuses on the commonest reconstructive procedures in both the upper and lower urinary tracts including laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, laparoscopic and robotic bladder diverticulectomy, laparoscopic and robotic partial cystectomy with urinary diversion, laparoscopic and robotic cystoplasty, repair of colovesical fistula, and, in urogynaecology, repair of vesicovaginal fistula. To evaluate the development, current status, feasibility, and safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in reconstructive urology the literature on the topic was collated and reviewed.

Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty and percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with low volume renal pelvis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective acquired data of 34 patients of laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty was compared with 26 patients of UPJO with pelvic volume less than 50 ml undergoing antegrade endopyelotomy and analyzed for clinical parameters, operative outcomes and success of procedures. All patients were followed up clinically and with diuretic renogram at regular intervals.

RESULTS

Mean age, renal pelvic volume and preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 25 years, 43.6 ml and 42.5 ml/min, respectively in endopyelotomy group and 21 years, 34.4 ml and 39.9 ml/min, respectively in laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Mean operative time, postoperative analgesic requirement and mean hospital stay was 100min, 250 mg and 4 days, respectively in endopyelotomy group and 210 min, 300 mg and 4 days, respectively in laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Only operative time was significantly different between two groups (P < 0.05). Mean follow-up was 36 and 39 months and success rates were 91.2% and 88.8% in laparoscopy and endopyelotomy group, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant complication was seen in endopyelotomy group while two patients had hematuria (one requiring blood transfusion) and three had increased drain output for more than 3 days in laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous endopyelotomy is associated with significantly less operative time and postoperative complication rate and provides equivalent success in comparison to nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with UPJO and low volume pelvis. It can be a preferred minimally invasive treatment modality for such patients.

Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction

Open pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment for adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with published success rates consistently over 90%. In recent years, the management of UPJO has been revolutionized by the introduction of endoscopic procedures and laparoscopic techniques. We analyzed the long-term results of endoscopic and other minimal access approaches for the treatment of UPJO.

Early results for endopyelotomy were promising but long-term results were not encouraging. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique is well defined and duplicates the surgical principles of conventional open pyeloplasty. With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of UPJO available, the treatment choice for UPJO must be based on the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon’s experience, the cost of the treatment, and the patient’s choice. We feel that with the technological advances in instrumentation coupled with a decrease in cost and improved training of urological surgeons, laparoscopic pyeloplasty may evolve to be the new “gold” standard for the treatment of UPJO.

Endopyelotomy in the age of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty

Ureteropelvic junction obstructixon (UPJO) management has undergone significant changes in the past few years. The aim of this review is to establish the role of endopyelotomy in the age of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP). Open pyeloplasty (OP) has been the gold standard of care for UPJO for the past six decades. Due to lower long-term efficacy, endopyelotomy has failed to replace OP. However, laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) has been able to reproduce the high success rates of OP, while also achieving minimal morbidity. Unfortunately, the steep learning curve and technical difficulties have hindered its use. Recently, robot-assisted systems have enabled LP to overcome its disadvantages, and this may render endopyelotomy obsolete. Although LP and RALP are emerging as the gold standard of treatment for UPJO, endopyelotomy could carve out a niche area as a salvage procedure. Endopyelotomy will continue to have a role in the management of UPJO, albeit a smaller one.

Percutaneous nephroscopic surgery

With the development of techniques for percutaneous access and equipment to disintegrate calculi, percutaneous nephroscopic surgery is currently used by many urologists and is the procedure of choice for the removal of large renal calculi and the management of diverticula, intrarenal strictures, and urothelial cancer. Although it is more invasive than shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde ureteroscopic surgery, percutaneous nephroscopic surgery has been successfully performed with high efficiency and low morbidity in difficult renal anatomies and patient conditions. These advantages of minimal invasiveness were rapidly perceived and applied to the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, calyceal diverticulum, infundibular stenosis, and urothelial cancer. The basic principle of endopyelotomy is a full-thickness incision of the narrow segment followed by prolonged stenting and drainage to allow regeneration of an adequate caliber ureter. The preferred technique for a calyceal diverticulum continues to be debated. Excellent long-term success has been reported with percutaneous, ureteroscopic, and laparoscopic techniques. Each approach is based on the location and size of the diverticulum. So far, percutaneous ablation of the calyceal diverticulum is the most established minimally invasive technique. Infundibular stenosis is an acquired condition usually associated with inflammation or stones. Reported series of percutaneously treated infundibular stenosis are few. In contrast with a calyceal diverticulum, infundibular stenosis is a more difficult entity to treat with only a 50-76% success rate by percutaneous techniques. Currently, percutaneous nephroscopic resection of transitional cell carcinoma in the renal calyx can be applied in indicated cases.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: which is the best treatment today?

The aim of this review is to critically compare the different procedures performed for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in order to identify, currently, the best treatment that a urologist should propose to patients with this condition. Three different types of procedures were assessed: open pyeloplasty (OP), endopyelotomy, and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). Regarding efficacy, success rates of 94.1, 62-83, and 95.9-97.2% were reported for OP, endopyelotomy, and LP, respectively. Concerning operative time and length of hospital stay, no extensive data are available in the literature, although endopyelotomy seems to provide shorter times with respect to those reported after OP and LP. Regarding the complication rate, it was very similar after the different techniques and due to the respective approaches. Overall, our data support the conclusion that LP provided a balance between the highly successful technique reported by OP and the quick postoperative recovery provided by the endoscopic approach. Anyway, in spite of these clear advantages, the reproducibility of LP is still strongly limited by the challenge of the learning curve. The da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), providing an extraordinary vision and precision of surgical movement, appears to be changing this scenario, allowing naïve surgeons to achieve very good results after few procedures. In this setting, robot-assisted pyeloplasty seems to be emerging as the new standard of care in the patients with UPJO, which will further take place over the other techniques once its costs decrease.

Ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction stenosis after pyeloplasty

INTRODUCTION

Pyeloplasty is a standard and highly successful treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, stenosis is a late complication causing symptom recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of holmium laser stenosis incision-"laser endopyelotomy"-to manage this.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen adult patients were referred for loin pain recurrence after pyeloplasty. Subsequent to ureteropelvic junction stenosis confirmation with intravenous urogram and dynamic isotope renogram investigations, the patients underwent ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy. Eleven patients had stents in situ before endopyelotomy. Ureteric stents (7F) were placed for 6 weeks postprocedure when ureteroscopy was repeated and stents removed. All patients had repeat intravenous urogram and renograms at 3 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

Patients presented at a median of 3.2 years (range, 9 months to 8 years) after pyeloplasty (nine open dismembered, three Culp, and three laparoscopic). Three patients (all nonstented) required a second incision. All patients were discharged from hospital within 23 hours with no complications. Symptomatic improvement was documented in all of the patients, and improved drainage was recorded in the 3-month nuclear scans.

CONCLUSION

Laser endopyelotomy is an appropriate minimally invasive procedure for postpyeloplasty stenosis. Results are better in patients with ureteric stents in situ before the procedure.

Lasers in percutaneous renal procedures

INTRODUCTION

Since the invention of lasers in 1960, they have been increasingly used in medicine. In this review paper, the types of lasers used in urology, in addition to their applications to percutaneous renal surgery will be reviewed. Specifically, use of lasers in the percutaneous management of renal stones, upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and stricture will be reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed was searched for citations since 1966. The following terms were used: "lasers", "calculi", "endopyelotomy", and "transitional cell carcinoma".

RESULTS

Due to its minimal depth of penetration, holmium laser has proven to be safe and efficacious. It is currently the primary energy source for flexible instrumentation, and also has demonstrated efficacy in percutaneous lithotripsy (faster than ultrasonic lithotripsy and safer than electrohydraulic lithotripsy). Holmium laser been used for antegrade endopyelotomy and percutaneous resection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Holmium laser is safer than other lasers and has become the gold standard for laser lithotripsy for flexible instrumentation. It has been used successfully in the percutaneous management of renal stones, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Holmium laser is an alternative energy source to conventional lithotripters and electrocautery for endopyelotomy and resection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Ureteroscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and ureteropelvic obstruction

Introduction:

Technological advances have increased the application of the endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Materials and Methods:

Published, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic treatment of upper tract TCC and UPJO were identified using the MEDLINE database.

Results:

Although nephroureterectomy remains the gold standard for upper tract TCC treatment, low-grade, low-stage and small tumors, especially in patients with solitary kidneys or poor renal function can be managed with encouraging success rates, despite the considerable recurrence rate. Endoscopic alternatives to pyeloplasty for UPJO can be used especially in cases with absence of crossing vessels, stricture length less than 1.5 cm, severe hydronephrosis and renal function less than 30%.

Conclusion:

Proper patient selection is critical for the successful endoscopic management of treatment of upper tract TCC and UPJO.

Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective study was performed to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and antegrade endopyelotomy and complications observed after the two procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five endopyelotomies and 90 laparoscopic pyeloplasties in patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) were performed. The diagnosis of UPJO was based on a complete medical history, ultrasonography, urography (IVU), and/or diuretic renography. In 52 cases, a Whitaker test was performed before endopyelotomy. The mean follow-up was 31 months in the endopyelotomy group and 28.5 months in the laparoscopy group. Complete success was defined as absence of any clinical symptoms combined with significant reduction of hydronephrosis on diuretic IVU and ultrasonography, and no sign of obstruction on diuretic IVU, diuretic renography, or Whitaker test.

RESULTS

Complete success was observed in 55.4% of patients after endopyelotomy and in 95.3% of patients after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In patients with primary UPJO, laparoscopic procedures yield better therapeutic results than endopyelotomy, irrespective of the degree of hydronephrosis. The number of complications after the two procedures was comparable with the exception of intraoperative bleeding, which was more frequent in the case of endopyelotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty should be the procedure of choice in the treatment of primary UPJO.

A multimodal training program for laparoscopic pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

We introduced a multimodal training program for laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and evaluated its safety, feasibility, and efficacy.

METHODS

The program consisted of box-trainer training, animal-model training, and operative training. Five trainees with different experiences in open pyeloplasty and laparoscopy were exposed to the program. The mentor performed objective and subjective evaluations at each stage to ensure the training quality and operation safety. The perioperative parameters of five groups of patients who underwent LP by the trainees independently were evaluated.

RESULTS

All trainees successfully finished the training program and independently performed five LPs under the supervision of the mentor. Five trainees spent different training times on the box-trainer and animal-model training,but acquired similar laparoscopic proficiency. There were no conversions to open procedures, transfusions, or deaths among the patients. No statistically significant difference was found in the operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and perioperative complications among the five trainees (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The multimodal training program can be used to train residents to perform advanced LP through step-by-step training from box trainer to animal model to clinical practice. The mentor-initiated approach is important to guarantee the training quality and safety.

Concomitant percutaneous nephrolithotomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by stones

INTRODUCTION

Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and stones can co exist. Therapeutic controversy exists regarding their ideal management. We present our experience of combining Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP),in patients with UPJ obstruction with multiple secondary, in the same session or staged manner.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From November 2006 till April 2008 ten patients underwent PNL with LP at our institution. Two of these patients had recurrent obstruction and stones after PNL and endopyelotomy. All patients had multiple calyceal and pelvic calculi (>10) with sizes ranging from 3 to 24 mm. Mean age of patients was 33 years (17-55). PNL was done in standard manner and was followed by laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

RESULT

Complete stone clearance could be achieved in all by PNL. Procedure was staged in 2 due to the presence of infected hydronephrosis. 9 patients underwent dismembered pyeloplasty and in 1 Fengerplasty was done. Reduction of baggy pelvis was required in 3 cases. Mean operative time was 3. 9 hours (3-5). Postoperatively the nephrostomy was kept for an average of 2 days (1-3). Drain was removed after an average of 3. 5 days (3-5). Mean hospital stay was 5. 2 days (5-7). None of the patients required blood transfusion. Stent was removed after 4 weeks. At 6 months patients are stone free on ultrasound and show good drainage on renal scan. One year follow-up is available for 5 patients which shows a stone free status and good drainage across UPJ.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant PNL and laparoscopic pyeloplasty are feasible and safe for patients with UPJ obstruction complicated by multiple calculi. We did not encounter any intraoperative difficulty during pyeloplasty following PNL.

Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVES

To report our long-term experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after a failed open procedure. Laparoscopic repair of a primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is associated with very high long-term success. However, there are limited data on patients who have failed previous open pyeloplasty. We have determined that salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an excellent option for these patients.

METHODS

We queried our laparoscopic pyeloplasty database of 367 patients from July 1994 to May 2007 for patients who had undergone prior open pyeloplasty. We analyzed demographic data, perioperative course, complications, and follow-up studies on identified subjects. We assessed clinical status by verbal pain scale and diagnostic studies. Radiologic follow-up consisted of diuretic renal scan, intravenous pyelography, or both.

RESULTS

We identified 9 patients (2.5%) who underwent salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty for persistent obstruction after open pyeloplasty. The mean age of our cohort was 30.5 years (range, 19-50 years). Mean operative time was 204 minutes (range, 80-264 minutes), estimated blood loss was 105 mL (range, 20-300 mL), and mean length of stay was 2.1 days (range, 2-3 days). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. All patients reported relief of symptoms in the immediate postoperative period. At a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 12-119 months), 8 of 9 patients (89%) had clinical and radiologic resolution of UPJO with stable renal function, pain free status, and a patent ureteropelvic junction. The remaining patient failed laparoscopic repair within the first year with evidence of persistent obstruction, necessitating endopyelotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an excellent option for patients who failed previous open pyeloplasty. This approach provides durable long-term outcomes.

Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Several minimally invasive approaches to treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction are now in the urologist's armamentarium. This review provides in-depth analysis of endopyelotomy, endopyeloplasty, and laparoscopic pyeloplasty and suggests a treatment algorithm for proper patient selection to improve efficacy and minimize morbidity.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves good results, in the range of 90-100%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty results are as good as those of open surgery. However, the goal of laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a means of providing minimally invasive surgery to a larger number of patients has not been achieved. The reason for this is the difficulty faced by most urologists in acquiring the technical skills to perform a laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In reports of robot-assisted pyeloplasty, results in the range of 88-97% appear to be achieved. Robotic technology has the potential to make minimally invasive pyeloplasty an easier skill to acquire for a larger number of urologists. Long-term data are still required to determine its efficacy.