Salvage radiotherapy for men with isolated rising PSA or locally palpable recurrence after radical prostatectomy: do outcomes differ?

High postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen level prior to salvage radiation therapy is not always a bad sign

Although radical prostatectomy is a popular treatment modality for clinically localized prostate cancer, 10-year biochemical recurrence can reach 28%. Before salvage radiation therapy (SRT), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values alone should be used cautiously in predicting SRT eligibility. A long, slow PSA rise may suggest locally confined disease still amenable to SRT; corresponding imaging to identify potential gross recurrence is useful. Patients with local disease may safely benefit from higher doses of radiation.

Predictive factors of late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Objective

To assess the characteristics of biochemical recurrence in the late period (>5 years after radical prostatectomy) and the differences in the predictors of biochemical recurrence in different periods, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods

We reviewed 478 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. All of the patients were followed up for at least 5 years. The cohort was then divided into three groups; no recurrence group, recurrence <5 years after surgery group and recurrence ≥5 years after surgery group. The background characteristics of each group were compared using the χ2 test. A Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of biochemical recurrence in each period.

Results

Biochemical recurrence occurred in 135 men. In 113 (84%) of the patients, biochemical recurrence occurred at <5 years after surgery; in 22 (16%), it occurred at ≥5 years after surgery. The proportion of men with a low preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was significantly larger in the latter group (P = 0.0023). A preoperative prostate-specific antigen level and a positive surgical margin were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence at <5 years after surgery (hazard ratio: 1.03 and 3.20). A positive surgical margin was also a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence at ≥5 years after surgery (hazard ratio: 3.03); however, a high preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was not.

Conclusions

Biochemical recurrence occurred at ≥5 years after surgery in 16% of the patients. A positive surgical margin predicted biochemical recurrence in both the early and late periods.

Salvage Brachytherapy for Castration-Resistant and External Beam Radiotherapy-Resistant Local Recurrence 17 Years after Radical Prostatectomy

A 47-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with prostate cancer in February 1995 (Initial PSA 77.2 ng/mL, GS3 + 4, cT3N0M0). He underwent radical prostatectomy after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in June 1995. Nine years after operation, he was diagnosed with local recurrence of prostate cancer and he received postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (70 Gy). By May 2008, the PSA dropped to 0.33 ng/mL, and a CT scan showed that the mass had disappeared. On April 2012, the PSA once again rose to 3.1 ng/mL. CT scan and MRI revealed a mass in the prostatic bed. We diagnosed local recurrence of prostate cancer. We underwent salvage low-dose brachytherapy after obtaining informed consent. The prescribed dose of the salvage brachytherapy was 145 Gy to control the tumor considering the hormone resistant prostatic cancer and high-risk feature. PSA level rapidly decreased to 0.66 ng/mL by 6 months after seed implantation. No adverse events were seen during the follow-up period.

Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications and open questions

Biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy occurs in approximately 15–40% of patients within 5 years. Postoperative radiotherapy is the only curative treatment for these patients. After radical prostatectomy, two different strategies can be offered, adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is defined as treatment given directly after surgery in the presence of risk factors (R1 resection, pT3) before biochemical relapse occurs. It consists of 60–64 Gy and was shown to increase biochemical relapse-free survival in three randomized controlled trials and to increase overall survival after a median followup of 12.7 years in one of these trials. Salvage radiotherapy, on the other hand, is given upon biochemical relapse and is the preferred option, by many centers as it does not include patients who might be cured by surgery alone. As described in only retrospective studies the dose for salvage radiotherapy ranges from 64 to 72 Gy and is usually dependent on the absence or presence of macroscopic recurrence. Randomized trials are currently investigating the role of adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy. Patients with biochemical relapse after prostatectomy should at the earliest sign of relapse be referred to salvage radiotherapy and should preferably be treated within a clinical trial.

Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling

PURPOSE

For prostate cancer that is thought to be locally recurrent after prostatectomy, the optimal timing, dose and techniques for salvage radiotherapy (SRT) have not been established. Here we perform a systematic review of published reports including regression meta-analysis and radiobiologic modelling to identify predictors of biochemical disease control and late toxicity.

METHODS

We performed a review of published series reporting treatment outcomes following SRT. Studies with at least 30 patients, median PSA before SRT of less than 2.0 ng/mL, and median follow-up of greater than 36 months were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test Gleason Score, SRT dose, SRT timing, pre-SRT PSA, whole pelvic irradiation and androgen deprivation therapy as predictors of 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and severe (grade≥3) late GI and GU toxicity. bPFS and toxicity data were fit to tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability models, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Five-year bPFS ranged from 25% to 70%. Severe late GI toxicity rates were 0% to 9%, and severe late GU toxicity rates were 1-11%. On multivariate analysis, bPFS increased with SRT dose by 2.5% per Gy and decreased with pre-SRT PSA by 18.3% per ng/mL (p<0.001). Late GI and GU toxicity increased with SRT dose by 1.2% per Gy (p=0.012) and 0.7% per Gy (p=0.010), respectively. Radiobiological models demonstrate the interaction between pre-SRT PSA, SRT dose and bPFS. For example, an increase in pre-SRT PSA from 0.4 to 1.0 ng/mL increases the SRT dose required to achieve a 50% bPFS rate from 60 to 70Gy. This could increase the rate of severe late toxicity by approximately 10%.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical control rates following SRT increase with SRT dose and decrease with pre-SRT PSA. Severe late GI and GU toxicity rates also increase with SRT dose. Radiobiological models suggest that the therapeutic ratio of SRT may be improved by initiating treatment at low PSA levels.

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage?

Approximately 15-25% of men who undergo radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer will experience a PSA-defined biochemical recurrence (BCR) of their cancer--men with poorly differentiated cancer, non-organ-confined disease, and positive surgical margins are at the highest risk. Accumulating evidence indicates that postoperative radiation therapy to the prostate bed favorably influences the course of disease in men with pathological features of poor prognosis. Three phase III randomized trials of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation have reported improved freedom from BCR, and one study has reported improved metastasis-free survival and overall survival. Similar evidence from randomized trials for salvage radiotherapy is lacking; however, several observational studies have reported durable responses to salvage radiotherapy and reduced cancer-specific mortality in a substantial proportion of high-risk patients, provided that it is administered at the earliest evidence of BCR. The appeal of salvage radiotherapy is that a substantial proportion of patients with non-organ-confined cancer or positive surgical margins are cured after radical prostatectomy alone, thereby limiting the adverse effects of postoperative radiotherapy--which include urinary and bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and secondary pelvic malignancies--to only those whose cancer was not cured by surgery. In the absence of data from randomized trials demonstrating the superiority of adjuvant radiotherapy over a surveillance strategy (with planned salvage radiotherapy at the earliest evidence of BCR), we advocate shared decision making between physicians and patients, based on the relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

HIFU as salvage first-line treatment for palpable, TRUS-evidenced, biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To test high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as salvage first-line treatment for palpable, TRUS-evidenced, biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with palpable, TRUS-evidenced, biopsy-proven local recurrence of CaP after RP, unwilling to undergo salvage radiotherapy (SRT), underwent HIFU as a single-session procedure. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data including early and late complications, and oncologic outcomes (PSA nadir, biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, and need of secondary adjuvant treatment) were prospectively evaluated. Success was defined as PSA nadir ≤0.1 ng/ml obtained within 3 months from HIFU. In case of PSA nadir >0.1 ng/ml or PSA increase ≥1 ng/ml above the PSA nadir, a biopsy of the treated lesion was performed, and if negative, maximum androgen blockade (MAB) was adopted. In case of positive biopsy, RT was performed. Failure was defined as use of secondary adjuvant treatment (MAB or RT).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months. All cases were performed as overnight procedure. No case of urethrorectal fistula or anastomotic stricture was observed. Two cases of acute urinary retention were resolved with prolonged urethral catheterization. Four cases of stress urinary incontinence were observed; 2 (mild incontinence) were resolved after pelvic floor exercises within 6 months, while 2 cases of severe incontinence required surgical minimally invasive treatment;17/19 patients (89,5%) were classified as success. Two patients failed to show a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml. During follow-up, 8/17 patients (47%) were classified as failure, with consequent total rate of failures 10/19 (52.6%). A statistically significant difference was observed in pre-HIFU median PSA (2 vs. 5.45 ng/ml, respectively, P = 0.013) and Gleason score of the RP specimen (P = 0.01) between the success and failure group.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage first-line HIFU for palpable, TRUS-evidenced, biopsy-proven local recurrence of CaP is a feasible, minimally invasive day-case procedure, with an acceptable morbidity profile. It seems to have a good cancer control in the short- and mid-term. Patients with lower pre-HIFU PSA level and favorable pathologic Gleason score presented better oncologic outcomes. A prospective randomized trial with an adequate recruitment and follow-up is necessary to confirm our preliminary oncologic results.

Role of MRI in follow-up after focal therapy for prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In patients with clinically suspected local recurrence of prostate cancer, a lobulated hyperintense mass in the radical prostatectomy fossa can be readily visualized with T2-weighted MRI, but this imaging technique is less successful after treatments such as radiation therapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and cryosurgery. We describe the additional value of functional techniques in the assessment of local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The use of functional MRI techniques such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI has shown promise in increasing overall imaging performance in the detection of local recurrence.

Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy: issues and challenges

A progressively rising level of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) invariably indicates the recurrence of prostate cancer. The optimal management of patients with post-RP PSA relapse has remained uncertain due to a wide variability in the natural course of post-RP PSA relapse and the inability to separate a recurrent disease confined to the prostate bed from that with occult distant metastasis. Management uncertainty is further compounded by the lack of phase III clinical studies demonstrating which therapeutic approach, if any, would prolong life with no significant morbidity. Radiotherapy has been the main therapeutic modality with a curative potential for patients with post-RP PSA relapse. This review article depicts issues and challenges in the management of patients with post-RP PSA relapse, presents the literature data for the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy, either alone or in combination of androgen ablation therapy, and discusses future directions that can optimize treatment strategies.

[pT3R1 prostate cancer : Immediate or delayed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?]

Approximately 50-60% of patients with tumor stage pT3R1 after radical prostatectomy (RP) who do not receive adjuvant therapy develop biochemical progression. At present it is unclear whether these patients should undergo immediate adjuvant irradiation or whether a wait and see approach should be adopted while monitoring PSA until the PSA level rises from zero and then initiate salvage radiotherapy (SRT).Three randomized trials showed that an absolute improvement of 20% in the 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) could be achieved by administering adjuvant radiotherapy with 60 Gy in patients with tumor stage pT3R1, even with a PSA level around zero after RP. The rate of serious late effects is low. On the other hand, there are numerous, albeit retrospective studies, which provide evidence that SRT after an increase in PSA above zero is an effective treatment, but with higher total doses of 66-70 Gy and a higher rate of late effects. Prognostic factors such as the PSA level before radiotherapy is started, PSA doubling time, R1 resection, PSA velocity, and the Gleason score have a significant impact on both the return of the PSA level to zero and the bNED. Depending on the risk factor, between 20 and 70% of patients again achieve PSA levels around zero after SRT. Retrospective comparative studies suggest a benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy; prospective randomized trials do not exist.Adjuvant radiotherapy after RP in stage pT3R1 tumor and SRT in cases of PSA rising above zero or persistent PSA levels are valid options for the management of high-risk patients after RP. SRT requires higher total doses and thus carries a higher risk of late complications. A benefit has been demonstrated for bNED, but not for survival. The approach should be discussed with the individual patient.

Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience

Background

To assess the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for persistent or rising PSA after radical prostatectomy and to determine prognostic factors identifying patients who may benefit from salvage RT.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2003, 59 patients underwent RT for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients received a median of 66 Gy to the prostate bed with 3D or 2D RT. The main end point was biochemical failure after salvage RT, defined as an increase of the serum PSA value >0.2 ng/ml confirmed by a second elevation.

Results

Median follow-up was 38 months. The 3-year and 5-year bDFS rates were 56.1% and 41.2% respectively. According to multivariate analysis, only preRT PSA ≥1 ng/ml was associated with biochemical relapse.

Conclusion

When delivered early, RT is an effective treatment after radical prostatectomy. Only preRT PSA ≥1 ng/ml predicted relapse.

Management of asymptomatic rise in prostatic-specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer

Biochemical failure after curative-intent therapies is an increasingly common dilemma confronting patients and physicians. No definition of biochemical failure exists that can be applied to all forms of treatment and that is not to some degree affected by the follow-up interval, pretreatment prognostic factors, or the frequency of prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Available imaging techniques lack sensitivity in detection of occult micrometastases. Prognostic factors such as tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics should be considered when recommending second-line therapies. For those patients with suspected localized recurrence, second-line treatment with salvage therapies may provide long-term disease control. Hormonal therapy, although most commonly employed for PSA recurrence, is of palliative benefit only. Currently, the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for asymptomatic patients with evidence of biochemical failure remains undefined.

Radiotherapy in the management of common genitourinary malignancies

A continued role for radiation therapy in the multidisciplinary management of genitourinary malignancies seems certain. Treatment outcomes continue to improve, accompanied by diminishing rates of toxicity. With continued technologic advances in the delivery of radiation, including the use of adaptive radiotherapy, the discovery and application of novel treatment agents, and the combined efforts of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists, patients who have genitourinary malignancies have an excellent chance of cure.

Sustained long-term immune responses after in situ gene therapy combined with radiotherapy and hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To explore long-term immune responses after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with prostate specific antigen 10 or higher or Gleason score of 7 or higher or clinical stage T2b to T3 were treated with gene therapy that consisted of 3 separate intraprostatic injections of AdHSV-tk on Days 0, 56, and 70. Each injection was followed by 2 weeks of valacyclovir. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was delivered 2 days after the second AdHSV-tk injection for 7 weeks. Hormonal therapy was initiated on Day 0 and continued for 4 months or 2.3 years. Blood samples were taken before, during, and after treatment. Lymphocytes were analyzed by fluorescent antibody cell sorting (FACS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 4-48 months). The mean percentages of DR+CD8+ T cells were increased at all timepoints up to 8 months. The mean percentages of DR+CD4+ T cells were increased later and sustained longer until 12 months. Long-term (2.3 years) use of hormonal therapy did not affect the percentage of any lymphocyte population.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained long-term (up to 8 to 12 months) systemic T-cell responses were noted after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Prolonged use of hormonal therapy does not suppress this response. These results suggest the potential for sustained activation of cell-mediated immune responses against cancer.

Parameters for Treatment Decisions for Salvage Radiation Therapy

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common primary treatment for prostate cancer. About 40% of those with high-risk pathologic features, such as a positive margin or seminal vesicle involvement, will develop biochemical failure at some point in the future. Radiotherapy (RT), with or without concurrent androgen deprivation, has been used liberally in the management of men with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP, based mostly on relatively small retrospective series. Factors such as the prostatectomy Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, absolute pre-RT PSA level, and pre-RT PSA doubling time are emerging as important determinants of outcome after RT. These factors should be used as a guide to the options of local therapy alone (RT), local therapy plus systemic therapy (typically androgen deprivation therapy), and systemic therapy alone.