Perioperative clinical thromboembolic events after radical or partial nephrectomy

An increase in tumor size increases the risk of the development of postoperative cardiopulmonary events in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of kidney tumor size on the risk of CPE developing in the first postoperative month.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation was made of 127 patients who underwent PN between January 2010 and November 2022. The patients were separated into two groups as Group 1 (n: 13) including patients who developed CPE within the first postoperative month and Group 2 (n: 114) of patients who did not develop CPE. The factors that could affect CPE and overall survival were analyzed with multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The groups were determined to be similar in respect of age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.35, p = 0.68, p = 0.42, respectively). The values of mean tumor size (48.6 ± 12.9 vs. 29.2 ± 8.7 mm, p < 0.001), clinical T1b stage (61.5% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001), median R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score (9[3] vs.6 [1], p = 0.001) and mean warm ischaemia time (21.2 ± 3.5 vs. 15.9 ± 2.63 min, p < 0.001) were determined to be statistically significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2. In the ROC curve analysis performed to predict the development of CPE within the first postoperative month, 35.5 mm was determined to be the best cut-off point for tumor diameter (AUC = 0.88, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of CPE for overall survival, and increased tumor size for the development of CPE were each determined to be independent risk factors (OR: 3.25, p = 0.03; OR: 1.4, p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size serves as a significant marker for the development of CPE within the initial month following PN.

The Impact of Venous Thromboembolism on Mortality and Morbidity During Nephrectomy for Renal Mass

OBJECTIVES

To determine the morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with having concurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at the time of surgical resection of a renal mass.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 108,430 patients undergoing elective partial or radical nephrectomy for a renal mass from 2013 to 2017 using the Premier Healthcare database. The association of VTE with 90-day complication rates, mortality, ICU admission, readmission, and direct hospital costs (2019 US dollars) was determined with multivariable logistic regression and quantile regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 108,430 patients who underwent elective partial or radical nephrectomy, 1.2% (n=1,301) of patients were diagnosed with a preoperative VTE. Patients with preoperative VTE have higher rates of minor (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34-1.62, p<0.0001) and major complications (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.23-2.86, p<0.0001), mortality (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.6-2.57, p<0.0001), and readmissions (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.57-1.90, p<0.0001) compared to patients without preoperative VTE at the time of nephrectomy. Notably, the predicted probability for a major complication was significantly higher among patients with preoperative VTE who underwent either partial or radical nephrectomy, irrespective of the surgical approach utilized. Furthermore, rates of all types of complications except endocrine and soft tissue were significantly increased in patients undergoing nephrectomy with preoperative VTE compared to those without VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

VTE at the time of nephrectomy is associated with significantly higher rates of major complications, increased mortality, and higher overall costs. Taken together, these findings have important implications for the counseling and management of renal masses in presence of VTE.

Use of Pre-operative Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a single dose of preoperative enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis impacts rates of thrombotic and bleeding events after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPNx).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of RPNx patients from 2009 to 2020 was performed. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients receiving a single dose of preoperative enoxaparin and those who did not. The primary outcome was 30-day hemorrhagic complications (transfusion ≥2 units, embolization, or reoperation for bleeding). Secondary outcomes were 30-day VTE events. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for significant differences between groups and to identify predictors of hemorrhagic complications among patients.

RESULTS

Among 945 RPNx procedures, 794 (84%) received preoperative enoxaparin (PPx) and 151 (16%) did not (NPPx). The PPx cohort was older (P = .004), had lower BMI (P = .03), lower ASA class (P = .049), and fewer smokers (P = .03). Warm ischemia time was longer for PPx patients (P < .001). 4.9% and 2.6% of the PPx and NPPx cohorts, respectively, developed postoperative hemorrhagic complications (P = .29). After adjustment for potential covariates, pharmacologic prophylaxis was not associated with 30-day hemorrhagic complications (P = .39). On multivariable regression, longer warm ischemia time (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, P = .02) and greater tumor size (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.56, P = .02) were predictors of hemorrhagic complications. 30-day readmissions, VTE events, and mortality were similar between groups (all P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Similar rates of thrombotic and bleeding events occurred between patients receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis and those who did not. Single dose of preoperative enoxaparin did not significantly alter perioperative outcomes after RPNx.

Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism is Associated with Inferior Survival among Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

We investigated the incidence and survival impact of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 183 patients who underwent nephrectomy with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy (level I-IV) for renal cell carcinoma between 2000 and 2010. Postoperative venous thromboembolism was defined as symptomatic bland thrombus or embolism confirmed on imaging. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations of clinicopathological features with time to thromboembolism after surgery and all cause mortality were evaluated on multivariable analysis with Cox models.

RESULTS

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism developed in 55 patients a median of 23 days (IQR 5-142) postoperatively, including pulmonary thrombosis in 24, deep venous thrombosis in 17, bland inferior vena cava thrombosis in 13 and portal vein thrombosis in 1. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolism 30, 90 and 365 days following surgery was 17%, 22% and 27%, respectively. A history of smoking (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.09-4.24, p = 0.028), ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 1 or greater (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.17-3.93, p = 0.013), hypercoagulability disorder (HR 5.12, 95% CI 1.93-13.59, p = 0.001) and bulky lymphadenopathy at surgery (HR 4.84, 95% CI 1.87-12.51, p = 0.001) was significantly associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism on multivariable analysis. Postoperative venous thromboembolism was significantly associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04-2.23, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy is common within 90 days of surgery. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in this population is independently associated with a greater risk of mortality.

Global incidence and case fatality rate of pulmonary embolism following major surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition common after major surgery. Although the high incidence (0.3-30%) and mortality rate (16.9-31%) of PE in patients undergoing major surgical procedures is apparent from findings of contemporary observational studies, there is a lack of a summary and meta-analysis data on the epidemiology of postoperative PE in this same regard. Hence, we propose to conduct the first systematic review to summarise existing data on the global incidence, determinants and case fatality rate of PE following major surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WHO global health library (including LILACS), Web of Science and Google scholar from inception to April 30, 2017, will be searched for cohort studies reporting on the incidence, determinants and case fatality rate of PE occurring after major surgery. Data from grey literature will also be assessed. Two investigators will independently perform study selection and data extraction. Included studies will be evaluated for risk of bias. Appropriate meta-analytic methods will be used to pool incidence and case fatality rate estimates from studies with identical features, globally and by subgroups of major surgical procedures. Random-effects and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval will be used to summarise determinants and predictors of mortality of PE in patients undergoing major surgery.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide the most up-to-date epidemiology of PE in patients undergoing major surgery to inform health authorities and identify further research topics based on the remaining knowledge gaps.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017065126.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in urology: A review

Venous thromboembolism is potentially a lethal problem, and is associated with chronic morbidity. Venous thromboembolism is frequently diagnosed after urological surgery, yet the role of perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is not clearly defined. Any current recommendations are largely based on evidence derived from other surgical specialties. Even within different guidelines, there remains significant variation, suggesting a consensus is required. The present review aims to define the problem of venous thromboembolism within the urological population, and identifies patients at risk. It evaluates the role of various types of mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis, along with its timing and duration of administration in common urological operations. The current guidelines are summarized and compared in order to give the reader a better perspective of this vital condition.

Venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy: incidence, timing and associated risk factors from a national multi-institutional database

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after nephrectomy with specific focus on event timing and location (before or after hospital discharge) in order to identify modifiable risk factors and establish benchmarks for preventive interventions.

METHODS

Using the ACS-NSQIP database, we identified patients undergoing nephrectomy from 2006 to 2012. Patients were analyzed in two cohorts: collectively and by surgical approach [open vs. lap/robotic (MIS)]. Rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) were assessed and time to each event was established in relation to discharge status. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess association between preoperative risk factors, surgical variables, and VTE.

RESULTS

In total, 13,208 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of VTE was 1.2% (PE = 0.5% and DVT = 0.8, 0.1% DVT and PE). Using regression analysis, diabetes, dependent functional status, and longer operative time were associated with higher odds of DVT. For PE, dyspnea, disseminated cancer, and longer operative time were significant associations. The rate of VTE was higher in open surgery compared to MIS (2 vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). Median times to DVT and PE were 8.5 and 6 days, respectively, with 53.3% of DVTs and 63.1% of PEs occurring prior to discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of VTE after nephrectomy is low, occurs roughly one week after surgery, and is associated with longer hospital stays. Certain patient factors, open surgical approach, and longer operative times were associated with higher odds of post-operative VTE; these patients may benefit from more aggressive prophylaxis.

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy are the relevant surgical therapy options for localised renal cell carcinoma. However, debate regarding the effects of these surgical approaches continues and it is important to identify and summarise high-quality studies to make surgical treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of partial nephrectomy compared with radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS, Scopus, two trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 24 February 2017, together with reference lists; and contacted selected experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included a randomised controlled trial comparing partial and radical nephrectomy for participants with small renal masses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author screened all of the titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Next, two review authors independently assessed full-text reports, identified relevant studies, evaluated the eligibility of the studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The update of the literature search was performed by two independent review authors. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and data analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one randomised controlled trial including 541 participants that compared partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up was 9.3 years.Based on low quality evidence, we found that time-to-death of any cause was decreased using partial nephrectomy (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18). This corresponds to 79 more deaths (5 more to 173 more) per 1000. Also based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in serious adverse events (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.19 to 22.34). Findings are consistent with 4 more surgery-related deaths (3 fewer to 78 more) per 1000.Based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in time-to-recurrence (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.24). This corresponds to 12 more recurrences (14 fewer to 70 more) per 1000. Due to the nature of reporting, we were unable to analyse overall rates for immediate and long-term adverse events. We found no evidence on haemodialysis or quality of life.Reasons for downgrading related to study limitations (lack of blinding, cross-over), imprecision and indirectness (a substantial proportion of patients were ultimately found not to have a malignant tumour). Based on the finding of a single trial, we were unable to conduct any subgroup or sensitivity analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy may be associated with a decreased time-to-death of any cause. With regards to surgery-related mortality, cancer-specific survival and time-to-recurrence, partial nephrectomy appears to result in little to no difference.

Nonmodifiable factors and complications contribute to length of stay in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Introduction/Objective: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) offers a mean length of stay (LOS) of 2 to 3 days. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors on hospital LOS after RPN.

Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database to identify all patients undergoing RPN for localized tumors at five US centers from 2007 to 2013. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared among hospital LOS groups. Associated factors were modeled using univariate and multivariate cumulative logistic regression to determine factors predictive of hospital LOS.

Results: One thousand five hundred thirty-two patients were grouped into LOS 1 to 3 days (1298, 84.1%), LOS=4 days (133, 8.6%), and LOS >4 days (110, 7.2%). Patient demographics were similar between groups. Patients in the LOS=4 and LOS >4 day groups were more likely to have a higher Charlson comorbidity index score (mean 2.2, 3.1 and 3.8; p<0.001), higher nephrometry score (mean 7.1, 7.6, 7.8; p=0.0002), and larger tumors (mean 2.9, 3.6 and 3.5 cm; p<0.0001) than those in the LOS 1 to 3 day group. Significant differences in complication rates were observed when comparing LOS 1–3 (116, 8.9%), LOS=4 (40, 30%), and LOS >4 (59, 54%). According to the Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications, 11 grade 3 and 11 grade 4 complications occurred in patients with an LOS of 4 or more days (p<0.0001). Postoperative transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation, dyspnea/atelectasis, ileus, and acute renal failure each significantly predicted a hospital LOS >4 days (p<0.001).

Conclusion: 15.8% of patients undergoing RPN have an LOS of 4 days or more. Longer LOS was independently associated with higher Charlson index, nephrometry score (nonmodifiable factors), and perioperative complications (potentially modifiable). These data may be useful in perioperative counseling and payer precertification.

Venous thromboembolism after major urologic oncology surgery: a focus on the incidence and timing of thromboembolic events after 27,455 operations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence and timing of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism among patients undergoing major surgery for urologic malignancies. VTE events are stratified by occurrence in the inpatient vs outpatient settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to identify patients undergoing major surgery for urologic malignancies between 2005 and 2012. The incidence of overall 30-day VTE, postdischarge VTE, and post-VTE death was calculated for each surgical procedure. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for VTE, adjusting for covariates including age, race, gender, smoking status, medical comorbidities, performance of pelvic lymph node dissection, and operative time.

RESULTS

The study identified 27,455 patients who underwent an operation for malignancy--radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, radical prostatectomy, or radical cystectomy. The incidence and timing of VTE varied substantially across the procedures of interest. Overall, VTE occurred after radical cystectomy in 113 of 2065 of patients (5.5%), whereas only 19 of 2624 (0.7%) and 12 of 1690, respectively, of patients undergoing minimally invasive radical or partial nephrectomy procedures suffered a VTE event within 30-days of surgery. Among patients suffering a VTE after radical prostatectomy, 147 of 178 of venous thromboembolic events (82.6%) occurred after hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the significant burden of VTE beyond the time of hospital discharge. Identification of high-risk patients should prompt consideration of extended-duration VTE prophylaxis in the outpatient setting.

High plasma fibrinogen level represents an independent negative prognostic factor regarding cancer-specific, metastasis-free, as well as overall survival in a European cohort of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

Background:

In recent years, plasma fibrinogen has been ascribed an important role in the pathophysiology of tumour cell invasion and metastases. A relatively small-scale study has indicated that plasma fibrinogen levels may serve as a prognostic factor for predicting clinical outcomes in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.

Methods:

Data from 994 consecutive non-metastatic RCC patients, operated between 2000 and 2010 at a single, tertiary academic centre, were evaluated. Analyses of plasma fibrinogen levels were performed one day before the surgical interventions. Patients were categorised using a cut-off value of 466 mg dl⁻¹ according to a calculation by receiver-operating curve analysis. Cancer-specific (CSS), metastasis-free (MFS), as well as overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. To evaluate the independent prognostic impact of plasma fibrinogen level, a multivariable Cox regression model was performed for all three different endpoints.

Results:

High plasma fibrinogen levels were associated with various well-established prognostic factors, including age, advanced tumour stage, tumour grade and histologic tumour necrosis (all P<0.05). Furthermore, in multivariable analysis, a high plasma fibrinogen level was statistically significantly associated with a poor outcome for patients' CSS (hazard ratio (HR): 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–4.11, P<0.001), MFS (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.44–3.22, P<0.001) and OS (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.80–3.40, P<0.001).

Conclusion:

A high plasma fibrinogen level seems to represent a strong and independent negative prognostic factor regarding CSS, MFS and OS in non-metastatic RCC patients. Thus, this easily determinable laboratory value should be considered as an additional prognostic factor for RCC patients' individual risk assessment.

Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases

PURPOSE

We evaluated the incidence of perioperative complications after robotic partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated with robotic assisted partial nephrectomy across the 4 participating institutions. Demographic, blood loss, warm ischemia time, and intraoperative and postoperative complication data were collected. All complications were graded according to the Clavien classification system.

RESULTS

A total of 450 consecutive robotic assisted partial nephrectomies were done between June 2006 and May 2009. Overall 71 patients (15.8%) had a complication, including intraoperative and postoperative complications in 8 (1.8%) and 65 (14.4%), respectively. Hemorrhage developed in 2 patients (0.2%) intraoperatively and in 22 (4.9%) postoperatively. Seven patients (1.6%) had urine leakage. As classified by the Clavien system, complications were grade I-II in 76.1% of cases and grade III-IV in 23.9%. Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy was converted to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery in 3 patients (0.7%) and to radical nephrectomy in 7 (1.6%). There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data indicate that robotic assisted partial nephrectomy is safe. Most postoperative complications are Clavien grade I or II, or can be managed conservatively.