Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis Not Needed for Microsurgical Varicocelectomy

[Results of subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy]

INTRODUCTION

The subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy is considered as the gold standard surgical technique for the treatment of varicocele. The objective of this study is to evaluate the results of this technique on the resolution of pain and the parameters of sperm analysis.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study that includes 22 patients who have been operated over a period of six months for a clinically palpable varicocele via the microsurgical subinguinal technique. Nine patients were operated for pain and 13 patients for infertility with an abnormality of their sperm analysis.

RESULTS

All the patients operated for pain had a complete resolution of pain at the postoperative follow-up (3 months). Concerning the patients operated for infertility, 76.92% of the patients had a normal sperm analysis, 7.69% of the patients presented a partial improvement, and 15.39% of the patients without any improvement. Analysis of sperm's parameters at 3 months showed a significant improvement in the morphology (4.3% vs 6.69% of typical forms according to Kruger ; P<0.05) and mobility (progressive mobility 15.6% vs 23% postoperatively; P<0.01). A non-significant improvement (low sample) in the concentration was noted (21.58 million/mL preoperative vs 34.9 million/mL postoperative, P=0.08). Pregnancies are noted in 38.5% of patients. A postoperative complication was noted with surgical site infection resolved with antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

This single-center study confirms that the treatment of varicocele by subinguinal microsurgical route is an effective therapeutic strategy on symptomatic varicocele and in infertile men. This technique is associated with few complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Patient Satisfaction and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Sub-inguinal Microscopic Varicocelectomy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The long-term outcomes of varicocelectomy in adolescents is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate symptom improvement, hypogonadism, and paternity in those who underwent adolescent sub-inguinal microscopic varicocelectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done of adolescents (median=19, interquartile range (IQR)=16-19.75 years) who underwent microscopic varicocelectomy between 2011 and 2021. Demographics, surgical indications, and outcomes were collected, as well as pre- and postoperative hormone levels and semen parameters. A questionnaire was prospectively collected to evaluate orchialgia, paternity, and symptoms of hypogonadism. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were performed, with significance assessed at p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 46 adolescents were included. Age at the time of diagnosis and surgery was 19 (IQR=16-20) and 19 (IQR= 18-21) years, respectively. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and total testosterone were not affected after surgery. Similarly, semen parameters were preserved after varicocelectomy, with median concentration increasing from 12x106/ml to 16x106/ml but not reaching significance (p=0.272). A total of 26 men completed the questionnaire. The age of responders was 22 (IQR=21-24) years, and the time after having had the varicocelectomy was 36.5 (IQR= 18.25-62.25) months. Orchialgia persisted in five men, and three reported having a recurrence. Two men, who had a preoperative abnormal semen analysis, were actively trying to have children and reported successfully having achieved natural pregnancies. None of the patients reported having hypogonadism, and none were receiving testosterone therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that microscopic varicocelectomy in adolescents appears to be a safe and feasible procedure with a low rate of syndrome recurrence and no association with symptoms or biochemical evidence of hypogonadism.

Is surgical antibiotic prophylaxis necessary for pediatric orchiopexy?

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons frequently use surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP), despite limited evidence to support its efficacy. Potential adverse events associated with antibiotic use include allergic reaction (including anaphylaxis), Clostridium difficile infection, and selecting for resistant bacteria. Surgical site infections (SSI) are very rare in patients undergoing clean pediatric urologic procedures. Current guidelines are unclear about the efficacy of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of SSI in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

It was hypothesized that children who received SAP prior to orchiopexy would have no reduction in surgical site infection (SSI) risk but an increased risk of antibiotic-associated adverse events.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all males aged between 30 days and 18 years who underwent an orchiopexy (ICD-9 CM 62.5) in an ambulatory or observation setting from 2004 to 2015 using the Pediatric Health Information System database. Inpatients and those with concomitant procedures were excluded. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to determine the association between SAP and allergic reaction (defined as a charge for epinephrine or ICD-9 diagnosis code for allergic reaction on the date of surgery) and any of the following within 30 days: SSI, hospital readmission or any repeat hospital encounter. Mixed effects logistic regression was performed, controlling for age, race, and insurance, and clustering of similar practice patterns by hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 71,767 patients were included: median age was 4.6 years, 61.4% were white, and 49.3% had public insurance; 33.5% received SAP. Of these participants, 996/71,767 (1.4%) had a perioperative allergic reaction and <0.1% were diagnosed with an SSI. On mixed effects logistic regression, those who received SAP had 1.2 times the odds of a perioperative allergic reaction compared with those who did not receive SAP (P = 0.005). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with decreased rates of SSI, lower hospital readmission, nor a lower chance of a repeat encounter within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing orchiopexy, it was found that SAP did not reduce the risk of postoperative SSI, readmissions, or hospital visits. Patients who received SAP had significantly increased odds of perioperative allergic reaction. This demonstrated that the risks of SAP outweigh the benefits in children undergoing orchiopexy.

Variation in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Outpatient Pediatric Urological Procedures at United States Children's Hospitals

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for clean-contaminated procedures but none for clean procedures. The purpose of this study was to describe variations in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for outpatient urological procedures at United States children's hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the PHIS (Pediatric Health Information System®) database we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients younger than 18 years who underwent clean and/or clean-contaminated outpatient urological procedures from 2012 to 2014. We excluded those with concurrent nonurological procedures or an abscess/infected wound. We compared perioperative antibiotic charges for clean vs clean-contaminated procedures using a multilevel logistic regression model with a random effect for hospital. We also examined whether hospitals that were guideline compliant for clean procedures, defined as no surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, were also compliant for clean-contaminated procedures using the Pearson correlation coefficient. We examined hospital level variation in antibiotic rates using the coefficient of variation.

RESULTS

A total of 131,256 patients with a median age of 34 months at 39 hospitals met study inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing clean procedures were 14% less likely to receive guideline compliant surgical antibiotic prophylaxis than patients undergoing clean-contaminated procedures (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.88, p <0.0001). Hospitals that used antibiotics appropriately for clean-contaminated procedures were more likely to use antibiotics inappropriately for clean procedures (r = 0.7, p = 0.01). Greater variation was seen for hospital level compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for clean-contaminated procedures (range 9.8% to 97.8%, coefficient of variation 0.36) than for clean procedures (range 35.0% to 98.2%, coefficient of variation 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals that used surgical antibiotic prophylaxis appropriately for clean-contaminated procedures were likely to use surgical antibiotic prophylaxis inappropriately for clean procedures. More variation was seen in hospital level guideline compliance for clean-contaminated procedures.

Safety of clean urologic operations without prophylaxis antibiotic therapy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta: A double-blind randomized controlled trial study

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to identify the safety measures of performing clean urologic operations without administration of prophylaxis antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial with patients who underwent clean urologic operations in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, from April 2013 to January 2014. The local and systemic infection states were compared between the prophylaxis and placebo groups. Local infection was identified as surgical site infection and systemic infection as fever and leukocytosis.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients participated in the study (21 patients in each group), comprising 14 (33.3%) children and 28 (66.7%) adults. The most frequently performed operation was surgical sperm retrieval. No patients in either group were found to have local or systemic infection. However, there was a statistical difference in the white blood cell counts between the two groups (p = 0.003), although there was no sign of local or systemic infection in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Clean urologic operations without prophylaxis antibiotic therapy can be safely applied to urologic patients.