1
|
García Cortés Á, Colombás Vives J, Gutiérrez Castañé C, Chiva San Román S, Doménech López P, Ancizu Marckert FJ, Hevia Suárez M, Merino Narro I, Velis Campillo JM, Guillén Grima F, Torres Roca M, Diez-Caballero Y Alonso F, Rosell Costa D, Villacampa Aubá F, de Fata Chillón FR, Andrés Boville G, Barbas Bernardos G, Miñana López B, Robles García JE, Pascual Piédrola JI. Comparison of surgical approaches to radical prostatectomy in our series beyond oncological and functional outcomes. Actas Urol Esp 2022; 46:275-284. [PMID: 35260370 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to those of open (ORP) and laparoscopic (LRP) surgery. The interest lies fundamentally in the quality-of-life (QoL) evaluation, postoperative recovery, and personal satisfaction of patients with the intervention (PS) beyond oncological and functional outcomes. METHODS Six hundred eighty-five RPs were performed in our center between 2011-2018 (17,8% ORP, 22,2% LRP and 60% RARP). Patients were prospectively assessed through follow-up until April 2020 and a multiple questionnaire at 12-months post-RP that included ICIQ-SF, SHIM, IPSS, IQL and questions about pain, postoperative recovery and PS. Also baseline and postoperative patient- and treatment-related data were collected, and binomial logistic regressions were performed for the 1 vs.1 comparisons (ORP vs. RARP and LRP vs. RARP). RESULTS RARP patients have overall fewer comorbidities, less tumor aggressiveness, more operative time requirements and more positive surgical margins than ORP and LRP patients. Nevertheless, RARP outperforms ORP in: hospital stay (days) (OR 0,86; 95% CI: 0,80-0,94), hemoglobin loss (OR 0,38; 95% CI: 0,30-0,47), transfusion rate (OR 0,18; 95% CI: 0,09-0,34), early complications (p = 0,001), IQL (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,69-0,98), erectile function (OR 0,41; 95% CI: 0,21-0,79), pain control (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,75-0,89), postoperative recovery (p < 0,001) and choice of a different approach (OR 5,55; 95% CI: 3,14-9,80). RARP is superior to LRP in: urinary continence (OR 0,55; 95% CI: 0,37-0,82), IPSS (OR 0,96; 95% CI: 0,93-0,98), IQL (OR 0,76; 95% CI: 0,66-0,88), erectile function (OR 0,52; 95% CI: 0,29-0,93), postoperative recovery (p = 0,02 and 0,004), PS (p = 0,005; 0,002; and 0,03) and choice of a different approach (OR 7,79; 95% CI: 4,63-13,13). CONCLUSIONS The findings of our study globally endorse a positive effectiveness of RARP over ORP and/or LRP, both on functional issues, postoperative recovery, QoL and PS. Oncologic results should still be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Á García Cortés
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
| | - J Colombás Vives
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - C Gutiérrez Castañé
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - S Chiva San Román
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - P Doménech López
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - F J Ancizu Marckert
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - M Hevia Suárez
- Departamento de Urología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain
| | - I Merino Narro
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - J M Velis Campillo
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain
| | - F Guillén Grima
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - M Torres Roca
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - F Diez-Caballero Y Alonso
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Rosell Costa
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - F Villacampa Aubá
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - F R de Fata Chillón
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - G Andrés Boville
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - G Barbas Bernardos
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - B Miñana López
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - J E Robles García
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - J I Pascual Piédrola
- Departamento de Urología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García Cortés Á, Colombás Vives J, Gutiérrez Castañé C, Chiva San Román S, Doménech López P, Ancizu Marckert F, Hevia Suárez M, Merino Narro I, Velis Campillo J, Guillén Grima F, Torres Roca M, Diez-Caballero y Alonso F, Rosell Costa D, Villacampa Aubá F, de Fata Chillón F, Andrés Boville G, Barbas Bernardos G, Miñana López B, Robles García J, Pascual Piédrola J. Comparación entre abordajes quirúrgicos de prostatectomía radical en nuestra serie, más allá de los resultados oncológicos y funcionales. Actas Urol Esp 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
3
|
Li CC, Chang CH, Huang CP, Hong JH, Huang CY, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Wu WC, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Chen SH, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Jou YC, Wu CC, Lee HY, Yeh HC. Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731460. [PMID: 34671556 PMCID: PMC8522474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and surgical complications of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with different minimally invasive techniques for nephroureterectomy. Methods From the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 3,333 UTUC patients were identified. After excluding ineligible cases, we retrospectively included 1,340 patients from 15 institutions who received hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (HALNU), laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) or robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2001 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the survival outcomes, and binary logistic regression model was selected to compare the risks of postoperative complications of different surgical approaches. Results Among the enrolled patients, 741, 458 and 141 patients received HALNU, LNU and RNU, respectively. Compared with RNU (41.1%) and LNU (32.5%), the rate of lymph node dissection in HALNU was the lowest (17.4%). In both Kaplan-Meier and univariate analysis, the type of surgery was significantly associated with overall and cancer-specific survival. The statistical significance of surgical methods on survival outcomes remained in multivariate analysis, where patients undergoing HALNU appeared to have the worst overall (p = 0.007) and cancer-specific (p = 0.047) survival rates among the three groups. In all analyses, the surgical approach was not related to bladder recurrence. In addition, HALNU was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p = 0.002), and had the highest risk of major Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.011), paralytic ileus (p = 0.012), and postoperative end-stage renal disease (p <0.001). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery can be safe and feasible. We proved that compared with the HALNU group, the LNU and RNU groups have better survival rates and fewer surgical complications. It is crucial to uphold strict oncological principles with sophisticated technique to improve outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Małkiewicz B, Ptaszkowski K, Knecht K, Gurwin A, Wilk K, Kiełb P, Dudek K, Zdrojowy R. External Validation of the Briganti Nomogram to Predict Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer-Setting a New Threshold Value. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11060479. [PMID: 34070313 PMCID: PMC8227656 DOI: 10.3390/life11060479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Introduction: The study aimed to test and validate the performance of the 2012 Briganti nomogram as a predictor for pelvic lymph node invasion (LNI) in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to examine their performance and to analyse the therapeutic impact of using a different nomogram cut-off. (2) Material and Methods: The study group consisted of 222 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RP with ePLND between 01/2012 and 10/2018. Measurements included: preoperative PSA, clinical stage (CS), primary and secondary biopsy Gleason pattern, and the percentage of positive cores. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic analysis was appointed to quantify the accuracy of the primary nomogram model to predict LNI. The extent of estimation associated with the use of this model was graphically depicted using calibration plots. (3) Results: The median number of removed lymph nodes was 16 (IQR 12–21). A total of 53 of 222 patients (23.9%) had LNI. Preoperative clinical and biopsy characteristics differed significantly (all p < 0.005) between men with and without LNI. A nomogram-derived cut-off of 7% could lead to a reduction of 43% (95/222) of lymph node dissection while omitting 19% (10/53) of patients with LNI. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value associated with the 7% cut-off were 81.1%, 50.3%, and 96.3%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The analysed nomogram demonstrated high accuracy for LNI prediction. A nomogram-derived cut-off of 7% confirmed good performance characteristics within the first external validation cohort from Poland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-506-158-136
| | - Kuba Ptaszkowski
- Department of Clinical Biomechanics and Physiotherapy in Motor System Disorders, Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Grunwaldzka 2, 50-355 Wroclaw, Poland;
| | - Klaudia Knecht
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
| | - Adam Gurwin
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
| | - Karol Wilk
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
| | - Paweł Kiełb
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
| | - Krzysztof Dudek
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Romuald Zdrojowy
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.G.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (R.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milonas D, Venclovas Z, Muilwijk T, Jievaltas M, Joniau S. External validation of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram and prediction of optimal candidate for lymph node dissection in clinically localized prostate cancer. Cent European J Urol 2020; 73:19-25. [PMID: 32395318 PMCID: PMC7203765 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of our study was to evaluate the external validity of the online Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram as a predictor for pelvic lymph node invasion (LNI) in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Material and methods The study cohort consisted of 679 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RP with PLND between 2005 and 2017. The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of MSKCC nomogram to predict LNI. The specificity, sensitivity and negative predictive value were calculated to assess LNI probability cut-off. Results A total of 81 of 679 patients had LNI (11.9%). The AUC of MSKCC nomogram was 79%. Using the cut-off value of 7% (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 45.2% and NPV 96.8%) a PLND could be omitted in 41% (279/679) of men. However, 3.2% (9/279) of men with LNI would be missed. MSKCC nomogram showed good calibration characteristics and high net benefit at decision curve analysis. Conclusions MSKCC nomogram in patients with PCa undergoing PLND has 79% discriminated accuracy for prediction of LNI in our cohort. Using a 7% nomogram cut-off, roughly 40% of men would be spared PLND with minimal risk to miss LNI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daimantas Milonas
- Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania.,Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zilvinas Venclovas
- Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mindaugas Jievaltas
- Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim JK, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kim HH, Kwak C. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) persistence 6 weeks after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection as predictive factor of radiographic progression in node-positive prostate cancer patients. J Cancer 2019; 10:2237-2242. [PMID: 31258727 PMCID: PMC6584413 DOI: 10.7150/jca.29714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of early postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer patients with lymph node invasion (LNI). Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis involved 96 patients who had a diagnosis of LNI with available data on the first PSA level at postoperative 6 weeks after RP and PLND between 2002 and 2014 at our institution. PSA persistence was defined as PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks after surgery. Radiographic progression was defined as positive imaging during follow-up after the onset of biochemical recurrence, consisting of a bone scan and/or computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or 18F-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/CT scan. Comparative analysis of patients with and without PSA persistence was done, and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression models assessed radiographic progression free survival (PFS). Results: Fifty two (54.2%) patients displayed PSA persistence. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly decreased 5-year radiographic PFS (64.2% vs. 93.2%, log-rank, p=0.009) in the PSA persistence group compared to the no PSA persistence group. In a multivariate analysis, PSA persistence was a statistically significant predictor of radiographic PFS. Conclusions: Early assessment of PSA after surgery is important for predicting radiographic progression in node-positive prostate cancer patients. Risk stratification based on the early PSA value after surgery would be helpful to identify patients who may benefit from early adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Kwon Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sujenthiran A, Nossiter J, Parry M, Charman SC, Aggarwal A, Payne H, Dasgupta P, Clarke NW, van der Meulen J, Cathcart P. National cohort study comparing severe medium-term urinary complications after robot-assisted vs laparoscopic vs retropubic open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2018; 121:445-452. [PMID: 29032582 PMCID: PMC5873443 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the occurrence of severe urinary complications within 2 years of surgery in men undergoing either robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) or retropubic open radical prostatectomy (ORP). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a population-based cohort study in men who underwent RARP (n = 4 947), LRP (n = 5 479) or ORP (n = 6 873) between 2008 and 2012 in the English National Health Service (NHS) using national cancer registry records linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics, an administrative database of admissions to NHS hospitals. We identified the occurrence of any severe urinary or severe stricture-related complication within 2 years of surgery using a validated tool. Multi-level regression modelling was used to determine the association between the type of surgery and occurrence of complications, with adjustment for patient and surgical factors. RESULTS Men undergoing RARP were least likely to experience any urinary complication (10.5%) or a stricture-related complication (3.3%) compared with those who had LRP (15.8% any or 5.7% stricture-related) or ORP (19.1% any or 6.9% stricture-related). The impact of the type of surgery on the occurrence of any urinary or stricture-related complications remained statistically significant after adjustment for patient and surgical factors (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Men who underwent RARP had the lowest risk of developing severe urinary complications within 2 years of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Nossiter
- Clinical Effectiveness UnitRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
| | - Matthew Parry
- Clinical Effectiveness UnitRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Susan C. Charman
- Clinical Effectiveness UnitRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of OncologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | | | - Noel W. Clarke
- Department of UrologyChristie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation TrustsManchesterUK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Paul Cathcart
- Department of UrologyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Chandrasekar T, Goldberg H, Klaassen Z, Sayyid RK, Hamilton RJ, Fleshner NE, Kulkarni GS. Lymphadenectomy in Gleason 7 prostate cancer: Adherence to guidelines and effect on clinical outcomes. Urol Oncol 2017; 36:13.e11-13.e18. [PMID: 28919181 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine usage trends, guideline adherence, and survival data for patients undergoing lymphadenectomy (LND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) for Gleason 7 prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS The SEER database was queried for all patients with nonmetastatic biopsy Gleason 7 PCa from 2004 to 2013. Distribution and trends of LND were analyzed. The Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram was applied to stratify patients based on risk of nodal disease at time of RP (<5% risk or ≥5% risk). Analyses were performed to determine covariates associated with LND receipt at time of RP and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS A total of 78,641 patients with either G34 or G43 PCa underwent RP (59,194 and 19,447, respectively). Of these patients, 61.2% of G34 and 73.5% of G43 patients underwent LND. During this 10-year period, the proportion of G43 patients undergoing LND remained relatively stable, whereas the proportion of G34 patients undergoing LND ranged between 55.9% and 67.9%. Regional differences were a predictor of LND receipt regardless of risk stratification, but did not translate to higher risk of CSM. Receipt of LND was not predictive of improved CSM in any of the cohorts analyzed. CONCLUSIONS The role of LND for Gleason 7 prostate adenocarcinoma is not yet standardized, as indicated by the variability of LND dissection rates. Receipt of LND did not improve CSM, and in G43 patients, it predicted higher CSM. As the effect of LND on CSM is uncertain, further evaluation of oncologic benefit in this patient population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Hanan Goldberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li R, Petros FG, Kukreja JB, Williams SB, Davis JW. Current technique and results for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Investig Clin Urol 2016; 57:S155-S164. [PMID: 27995219 PMCID: PMC5161019 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.s2.s155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The practice of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) remains one of the most controversial topics in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Although most urologists agree on its benefit for staging and prognostication, the role of the ePLND in cancer control continues to be debated. The increased perioperative morbidity makes it unpalatable, especially in patients with low likelihood of lymph node disease. With the advent of robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, many surgeons were slow to adopt ePLND in the robotic setting. In this study, we summarize the evidence for the prognostic and therapeutic roles of ePLND, review the clinical tools used for lymph node metastasis prediction and survey the numerous experiences of ePLND compiled by robotic urologic surgeons over the years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Li
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janet B Kukreja
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim JK, Kim HS, Park J, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kim HH, Kwak C. Perioperative Blood Transfusion as a Significant Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence and Survival after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154918. [PMID: 27159369 PMCID: PMC4861293 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There have been conflicting reports regarding the association of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) with oncologic outcomes including recurrence rates and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) affects biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) following radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 2,713 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer between 1993 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. We performed a comparative analysis based on receipt of transfusion (PBT group vs. no-PBT group) and transfusion type (autologous PBT vs. allogeneic PBT). Univariate and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to evaluate variables associated with BRFS, CSS, and OS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival estimates for BRFS, CSS, and OS, and log-rank test was used to conduct comparisons between the groups. Results The number of patients who received PBT was 440 (16.5%). Among these patients, 350 (79.5%) received allogeneic transfusion and the other 90 (20.5%) received autologous transfusion. In a multivariate analysis, allogeneic PBT was found to be statistically significant predictors of BRFS, CSS, and OS; conversely, autologous PBT was not. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly decreased 5-year BRFS (79.2% vs. 70.1%, log-rank, p = 0.001), CSS (98.5% vs. 96.7%, log-rank, p = 0.012), and OS (95.5% vs. 90.6%, log-rank, p < 0.001) in the allogeneic PBT group compared to the no-allogeneic PBT group. In the autologous PBT group, however, none of these were statistically significant compared to the no-autologous PBT group. Conclusions We found that allogeneic PBT was significantly associated with decreased BRFS, CSS, and OS. This provides further support for the immunomodulation hypothesis for allogeneic PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Kwon Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juhyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The effect of surgical approach on performance of lymphadenectomy and perioperative morbidity for radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:121.e15-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 09/13/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
13
|
Best Evidence Regarding the Superiority or Inferiority of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2014; 41:493-502. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
14
|
De Carlo F, Celestino F, Verri C, Masedu F, Liberati E, Di Stasi SM. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes: a systematic review. Urol Int 2014; 93:373-83. [PMID: 25277444 DOI: 10.1159/000366008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 07/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the wide diffusion of minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), few studies compare the results of these techniques with the retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) approach. The aim of this study is to compare the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes and cost-effectiveness of RRP, LRP, and RALP. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases in December 2013. A 'free-text' protocol using the term 'radical prostatectomy' was applied. A total of 16,085 records were found. The authors reviewed the records to identify comparative studies to include in the review. RESULTS 44 comparative studies were identified. With regard to the perioperative outcome, LRP and RALP were more time-consuming than RRP, but blood loss, transfusion rates, catheterisation time, hospitalisation duration, and complication rates were the most optimal in the laparoscopic approaches. With regard to the functional and oncological results, RALP was found to have the best outcomes. CONCLUSION Our study confirmed the well-known perioperative advantage of minimally invasive techniques; however, available data were not sufficient to prove the superiority of any surgical approach in terms of functional and oncologic outcomes. On the contrary, cost comparison clearly supports RRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco De Carlo
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Kenfield SA. Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Eur Urol 2014; 67:432-8. [PMID: 24582327 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2013] [Accepted: 01/31/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has become increasingly common; however, there have been no nationwide, population-based, non-claims-based studies to evaluate differences in outcomes between RALP and open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). OBJECTIVE To determine surgical, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes following RALP and RRP in a nationwide cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified 903 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2000 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy using RALP (n=282) or RRP (n=621) as primary treatment. INTERVENTION Radical prostatectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We compared patients undergoing RALP or RRP across a range of perioperative, oncologic, and HRQOL outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Use of RALP increased during the study period, constituting 85.2% of study subjects in 2009, up from 4.5% in 2003. Patients undergoing RALP compared to RRP were less likely to have a lymph node dissection (51.5% vs 85.4%; p<0.0001), had less blood loss (207.4 ml vs 852.3 ml; p<0.0001), were less likely to receive blood transfusions (4.3% vs 30.3%; p<0.0001), and had shorter hospital stays (1.8 d vs 2.9 d; p<0.0001). Surgical, oncologic, and HRQOL outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups. In multivariate logistic regression models, there were no significant differences in 3- or 5-yr recurrence-free survival comparing RALP versus RRP (hazard ratios: 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-2.08] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.18-3.11], respectively). CONCLUSIONS In a nationwide cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer, RALP was associated with shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss and transfusion rates than RRP. Surgical oncologic and HRQOL outcomes were similar between groups. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied men throughout the United States with prostate cancer who underwent surgical removal of the prostate. We found that robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy resulted in shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer blood transfusions than radical retropubic prostatectomy. There were no differences in cancer control or health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Derek Yecies
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorelei A Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stacey A Kenfield
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, Hu JC, Shariat SF, Sun M, Vickers AJ. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 64:786-98. [PMID: 23664423 PMCID: PMC4109273 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2012] [Accepted: 04/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Due to the complexity and challenging nature of radical prostatectomy (RP), it is likely that both short- and long-term outcomes strongly depend on the cumulative number of cases performed by the surgeon as well as by the hospital. OBJECTIVE To review systematically the association between hospital and surgeon volume and perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for original and review articles between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2011. Inclusion and exclusion criteria comprised RP, hospital and/or surgeon volume reported as a predictor variable, a measurable end point, and a description of multiple hospitals or surgeons. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall 45 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria, where most data originated from retrospective institutional or population-based cohorts. Studies generally focused on hospital or surgeon volume separately. Although most of these analyses corroborated the impact of increasing volume with better outcomes, some failed to find any significant effect. Studies also differed with respect to the proposed volume cut-off for improved outcomes, as well as the statistical means of evaluating the volume-outcome relationship. Five studies simultaneously compared hospital and surgeon volume, where results suggest that the importance of either hospital or surgeon volume largely depends on the end point of interest. CONCLUSIONS Undeniable evidence suggests that increasing volume improves outcomes. Although it would seem reasonable to refer RP patients to high-volume centers, such regionalization may not be entirely practical. As such, the implications of such a shift in practice have yet to be fully determined and warrant further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quoc-Dien Trinh
- CRCHUM, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Haese A, Heidenreich A, Menon M, Sulser T, Tewari AK, Eastham JA. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2013; 65:7-16. [PMID: 23582879 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Accepted: 03/25/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer is the most effective method for detecting lymph node metastases. However, a decline in the rate of PLND during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been noted. This is likely the result of prostate cancer stage migration in the prostate-specific antigen-screening era, and the introduction of minimally invasive approaches such as robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy, limitations, and complications of PLND during RARP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with no restriction of language from January 1990 to December 2012. The literature search used the following terms: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted, and lymph node dissection. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The median value of nodal yield at PLND during RARP ranged from 3 to 24 nodes. As seen in open and laparoscopic RP series, the lymph node positivity rate increased with the extent of dissection during RARP. Overall, PLND-only related complications are rare. The most frequent complication after PLND is symptomatic pelvic lymphocele, with occurrence ranging from 0% to 8% of cases. The rate of PLND-associated grade 3-4 complications ranged from 0% to 5%. PLND is associated with increased operative time. Available data suggest equivalence of PLND between RARP and other surgical approaches in terms of nodal yield, node positivity, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS PLND during RARP can be performed effectively and safely. The overall number of nodes removed, the likelihood of node positivity, and the types and rates of complications of PLND are similar to pure laparoscopic and open retropubic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris, France; Department of Urology, Jewish General Hospital and Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; INSERM 955, Team 7, University Paris 12, Créteil, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hansen J, Rink M, Bianchi M, Kluth LA, Tian Z, Ahyai SA, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Steuber T, Fisch M, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH. External validation of the updated Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended lymph node dissection. Prostate 2013; 73:211-8. [PMID: 22821742 DOI: 10.1002/pros.22559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2012] [Accepted: 06/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to test accuracy and generalizability of a recently updated nomogram to assess the probability of lymph node invasion (LNI), when applied to a different European cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study cohort consisted of 1,282 men with clinically localized PCa who underwent RP and ePLND, including removal of obturator, external iliac, and hypogastric lymph nodes, between 01/2007 and 08/2011. Descriptive measurements included preoperative clinical and biopsy variables, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage (CS), primary and secondary biopsy Gleason pattern, and percentage of positive cores. We used the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic analysis to quantify accuracy of the model to predict LNI. The extent of over- or under-estimation was explored graphically within loess calibration plots. RESULTS The median number of removed lymph nodes was 15 with an interquartile range of 12-20. Twelve percent (n = 155) of men had LNI. Preoperative clinical and biopsy characteristics differed significantly (all P ≤ 0.002) between men with LNI and those without. External validation of the previously reported updated LNI nomogram showed very good accuracy (AUC: 0.829). A nomogram-derived cut-off of 4% could lead to a reduction of 48% of lymph node dissection, while missing 10% of patients with LNI. CONCLUSIONS We report the external validation of an updated LNI nomogram, demonstrating accuracy and applicability in a different European cohort. A nomogram-derived cut-off of 4% confirmed good performance characteristics within a different external validation cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Hansen
- Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre at University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Williams SB, Amarasekera CA, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Nguyen PL, Hevelone ND, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Influence of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Radical Prostatectomy Costs. J Urol 2012; 188:2198-202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B. Williams
- Division of Urologic Oncology, the Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment at St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, California
| | | | - Xiangmei Gu
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nathanael D. Hevelone
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keith J. Kowalczyk
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sagalovich D, Calaway A, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Tewari AK. Assessment of required nodal yield in a high risk cohort undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on functional outcomes. BJU Int 2012; 111:85-94. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11351.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sagalovich
- LeFrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Institute of Prostate Cancer; James Buchanan Brady Foundation Department of Urology; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York Presbyterian Hospital; New York; NY; USA
| | - Adam Calaway
- LeFrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Institute of Prostate Cancer; James Buchanan Brady Foundation Department of Urology; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York Presbyterian Hospital; New York; NY; USA
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- LeFrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Institute of Prostate Cancer; James Buchanan Brady Foundation Department of Urology; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York Presbyterian Hospital; New York; NY; USA
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- LeFrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Institute of Prostate Cancer; James Buchanan Brady Foundation Department of Urology; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York Presbyterian Hospital; New York; NY; USA
| | - Ashutosh K. Tewari
- LeFrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Institute of Prostate Cancer; James Buchanan Brady Foundation Department of Urology; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York Presbyterian Hospital; New York; NY; USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hakimi AA, Ghavamian R. Feasibility of minimally invasive lymphadenectomy in bladder and prostate cancer surgery. Urol Clin North Am 2011; 38:407-18, v. [PMID: 22045172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
With the rapid and widespread adoption of minimally invasive procedures (laparoscopic and robotic) for the treatment of prostate and bladder cancers in the last decade, concerns have been raised regarding whether the technique can emulate the time-tested gold standard open procedures. This article briefly reviews the indications for lymph node dissection for bladder and prostate cancer, and reviews the role of extended lymphadenectomy in each procedure. Much of the focus of this review is on minimally invasive approaches and the technical aspects of the procedures, the feasibility of the robotic technique, and early oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ari Hakimi
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Feifer AH, Elkin EB, Lowrance WT, Denton B, Jacks L, Yee DS, Coleman JA, Laudone VP, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2011; 117:3933-42. [PMID: 21412757 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2010] [Revised: 12/15/2010] [Accepted: 01/03/2011] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component of prostate cancer staging and treatment, especially for surgical patients who have high-risk tumor features. It is not clear how the shift from open radical prostatectomy (ORP) to minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) has affected the use of PLND. The objectives of this study were to identify predictors of PLND and to assess the impact of surgical technique in a contemporary, population-based cohort. METHODS In Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, the authors identified men who underwent ORP or MIRP for prostate cancer during 2003 to 2007. The impact of surgical approach on PLND was evaluated, and interactions were examined between surgical procedure, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and Gleason score with the analysis controlled for patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Of 6608 men who underwent ORP or MIRP, 70% (n = 4600) underwent PLND. The use of PLND declined over time both overall and within subgroups defined by procedure type. PLND was 5 times more likely in men who underwent ORP than in men who underwent MIRP when the analysis was controlled for patient and tumor characteristics. Elevated PSA and biopsy Gleason score, but not clinical stage, were associated with a greater odds of PLND in both the ORP group and the MIRP group. However, the magnitude of the association between these factors and PLND was significantly greater for patients in the ORP group. CONCLUSIONS PLND was less common among men who underwent MIRP, independent of tumor risk factors. A decline in PLND rates was not fully explained by an increase in MIRP. The authors concluded that these trends may signal a surgical approach-dependent disparity in prostate cancer staging and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew H Feifer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prasad SM, Gu X, Lavelle R, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC. Comparative Effectiveness of Perineal Versus Retropubic and Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol 2011; 185:111-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiangmei Gu
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jim C. Hu
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lallas CD, Pe ML, Thumar AB, Chandrasekar T, Lee FC, McCue P, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ. Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 107:1136-40. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09621.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
25
|
Hu JC, Prasad SM, Gu X, Williams SB, Lipsitz SR, Nguyen PL, Choueiri TK, Choi WW, D'Amico AV. Determinants of performing radical prostatectomy pelvic lymph node dissection and the number of lymph nodes removed in elderly men. Urology 2010; 77:402-6. [PMID: 20719365 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2010] [Revised: 04/27/2010] [Accepted: 05/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Controversy persists regarding the adequacy of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and cancer control when comparing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) and open radical prostatectomy (RRP). We characterized determinants of performance and extent of PLND during radical prostatectomy in elderly men. METHODS A population-based study was conducted comprised of 5448 men ≥65 years undergoing RRP and MIRP during 2004 to 2006 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the effect of demographic and tumor characteristics, surgical approach, and surgeon volume on the likelihood of performing PLND. RESULTS PLND was performed for 87.6% vs. 38.3% of men undergoing RRP vs. MIRP (P <.001). Among RRP, 82.6% vs. 4.6% underwent extended vs. limited PLND, with a median yield of 4 vs. 3 lymph nodes (P <.001). Median MIRP PLND yield was 3 lymph nodes. In adjusted analyses, men undergoing RRP vs. MIRP (odds ratio [OR] 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.1-25.0), those with few vs. multiple comorbidities (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02-1.91), intermediate (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.48-2.37), and high (OR 2.77; 95% CI 2.02-3.78) vs. low-risk features, and men treated by high-volume surgeons (OR 1.008; 95% CI 1.004-1.011) were more likely to undergo PLND. Conversely, Hispanic (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.96) vs. white men were less likely to undergo PLND. CONCLUSIONS Independent of tumor characteristics, men undergoing RRP vs. MIRP were more likely to undergo PLND with greater lymph node yield and racial variation observed. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate use of PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim C Hu
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Association between ethnicity and prostate cancer outcomes across hospital and surgeon volume groups. Health Policy 2010; 99:97-106. [PMID: 20708815 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2010] [Revised: 07/04/2010] [Accepted: 07/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We analyzed the association between ethnicity and outcomes among prostate cancer patients across hospital and surgeon volume groups. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare databases for the period between 1995 and 2003, prostate cancer cases were identified and retrospectively followed for one year pre- and up to eight years post-diagnosis. Based on volume, hospitals and surgeons were divided into three groups each. For each group, we fitted separate models to analyze the association between ethnicity and outcomes such as complications, eight-year mortality and cost, adjusting for covariates. Poisson (zero inflation), generalized linear model (log-link), and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS African American ethnicity was associated with 30-day complications among medium volume hospital group. African American patients receiving care at medium volume hospitals and from medium volume surgeons had higher costs. Hispanic patients receiving care at low and medium volume hospitals had lower cost compared to white patients. Hispanic patients receiving care from a high-volume surgeon experienced increased hazard of long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS Association between ethnicity and outcomes varies across hospital and surgeon volume groups. Thus, volume based policy measures may need further exploration for understanding the interaction between structure, process, volume and outcomes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
The triumphal march of robots in urology seems to be unstoppable. In the meantime, a broadening of the scope for indications in urology can be observed: this applies to pyeloplasty and to a lesser degree also to partial nephrectomy and radical cystectomy. As yet no evidence has been provided that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) is superior to open surgery. Furthermore, data are available which suggest that the midterm functional results are possibly even worse than those achieved with open RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Hakenberg
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 6, 18055, Rostock, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Weizer AZ, Montgomery JS. The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology. J Endourol 2010; 24:1229-40. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alon Z. Weizer
- Division of Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey S. Montgomery
- Division of Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Cowan JE, Carroll PR. Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 105:88-92. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08699.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
30
|
Polcari AJ, Hugen CM, Sivarajan G, Woods ME, Paner GP, Flanigan RC, Quek ML. Comparison of Open and Robot-Assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Prostate Cancer. J Endourol 2009; 23:1313-7. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J. Polcari
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Cory M. Hugen
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Ganesh Sivarajan
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Michael E. Woods
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Gladell P. Paner
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Robert C. Flanigan
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Marcus L. Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Silberstein JL, Derweesh IH, Kane CJ. Lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2009; 12:227-32. [PMID: 19546882 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2009.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Since the initial report of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in 2001, the technique has gained rapid acceptance and utilization. When compared with more traditional forms of surgical intervention, there is still much debate with respect to cost, and impact on potency and continence. Less often is the focus on oncologic outcomes. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of prostatectomy is an important part of the surgical intervention for prostate cancer and is currently underreported during robotic procedures. Herein, we review the current controversies on the value and extent of PLND and the status of emerging data regarding robot-assisted PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Silberstein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego, Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103-8897, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|