Bacteriuria After Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Risk Factors and Correlation With Leukocyturia

The Headache of Post-Transurethral Prostate Surgery Pyuria: Pursuit for Evidence

Objective: To prospectively assess early post-transurethral prostate surgery (TUPS) urinalysis changes and bacteriuria with its clinical relevance. Methods: Patients with benign prostate obstruction enrolled for TUPS were prospectively assessed. Patients were assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively by the dysuria-visual-analogue-scale (DVAS), international prostate symptom scores (IPSS)-quality of life, uroflow, and postvoid residual. Routine urinalysis was performed before discharge and at all visits. Midstream urine culture (MSUC) was performed before discharge, and 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Results: At final analysis, 152 patients were evaluable. Significant pyuria was reported in 52%, 96.1%, 94.1%, 71.7%, 78.9%, and 52.5% in, before discharge, 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-week urinalysis postoperative, respectively. The mean time to nonsignificant pyuria (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 19.1 (17.5-20.7), 20.1 (17.3-22.9), 15.8 (12.8-18.8), and 14 (10.3-17.8) weeks after prostate resection, vaporization, enucleation, and incision, respectively (p = 0.03). Regardless the TUPS technique, half of patients had significant pyuria at 24 weeks postoperative. MSUC was positive in 37/152 (24.3%), 3/152 (2%), 23/152 (15.1%), and 5/152 (3.3%) preoperatively, before discharge, and 4 and 12 weeks postoperative, respectively. Only positive preoperative urine leukocyte esterase independently predicted positive 4-week MSUC (odds ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.1, p = 0.013). No significant correlation was found between IPSS or DVAS and positive MSUC, nor between IPSS and postoperative pyuria at different follow-up points (p > 0.05). However, the degree of postoperative dysuria was significantly correlated with postoperative pyuria count by urinalysis at 2 weeks (r = 0.69, p = 0.03), 8 weeks (r = 0.26, p = 0.001), and 12 weeks (r = 0.23, p = 0.004). Conclusion: There is a persistent but gradually declining pyuria and microhematuria following TUPS up to 6 months postoperative. An earlier resolution was noted following prostate incision and enucleation. While routine urine analysis screening in these months would be of no clear clinical value, a routine urine culture would be of a reasonable significance at 1 month postoperatively.

Pathogen species are the risk factors for postoperative infection of patients with transurethral resection of the prostate: a retrospective study

This study aimed to analyze the infection risk factors for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and establish predictive models to help make personalized treatment plans. Our study was designed one-center and retrospectively enrolled 1169 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. Risk factors were explored for postoperative infection. A TURP-postoperative infection (TURP-PI) model with infection prediction values was created. The improved-TURP-PI (I-TURP-PI) model, including extra new factors (pathogens species), was also built to see whether it could optimize the prediction abilities. At last, we developed a nomogram for better clinical application. Operation time, preoperative indwelling urinary catheter (PIUC), and positive preoperative urine culture were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Interestingly, pathogens species in pre-surgery urine (PEnterococcus faecium = 0.014, PPseudomonas aeruginosa = 0.086) were also independent risk factors. Patients with positive Enterococcus faecium (37.50%) were most likely to have postoperative infection. We built two models with AUCTURP-PI = 0.709 (95% CI 0.656-0.763) and AUCI-TURP-PI = 0.705 (95% CI 0.650-0.760). The nomogram could help improve the prediction ability. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use pathogen species in urine before surgery as risk factors for infection prediction after TURP. TURP-PI and I-TURP-PI models have essential roles in predicting patients' postoperative infections and in better postoperative antibiotic decision-making.

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline "2018 Standard Edition". However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons' surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy; the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons' skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

Complicated urinary tract infection in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a symptomatic urinary infection accompanied by functional or structural abnormalities of the genitourinary tract. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a major cause of lower urinary tract obstruction in male patients, and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to BPH can lead to UTIs in men. However, no evidence has clearly shown that UTI in the aging male population is associated with either post-void residual urine or BOO. Screening for the presence of bacteriuria is recommended prior to any procedure manipulating the urinary tract, and imaging studies of the upper urinary tract are recommended to identify underlying abnormalities. Recurrent or persistent UTI in men with BPH is an indication for surgical treatment. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should be screened for and treated before transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). In addition, antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the risk of UTI in patients undergoing TURP. The choice of specific antimicrobial for prophylaxis should be based on local pathogen prevalence and individual antibiotic susceptibility. Patients with severe systemic infections require hospitalization, and empirical therapy should include an intravenous antimicrobial regimen. Further prospective studies are needed to refine the treatment process for complicated UTI in patients diagnosed with BPH.

Comparison of three different antibiotic protocols in transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the possible infectious risk factors: A non-randomized, prospective study

INTRODUCTION

We sought to investigate three different antibiotic protocols in transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT), and the possible infectious risk factors of this surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a non-randomized, prospective study, gathering cases of patients in whom TURBT had been performed. The sample was divided into three groups based on those who received antibiotics as: a single preoperative dose (Group A); a preoperative dose, plus a long protocol during the hospitalization (Group B); a preoperative dose, plus a long protocol during the hospitalization, plus five days at home (Group C). Intra- and postoperative data that could be relevant to infections was gathered.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients were included. In the multivariate analysis, it was observed that the patients in Group A were more prone to re-hospitalization due to fever than were those from Group C (odds ratio [OR] 11.13; p=0.03). Furthermore, the cases with tumour necrosis and those who entered surgery with a urinary catheter were more prone to have a temperature above 37.5°C (OR6.74; p=0.02 and OR6.4; p=0.04, respectively), as well as have an increased risk per every additional tumour in the cystoscopy (OR 1.32; p=0.01). Those who received mitomycin had a lower chance of a positive urine culture (OR 0.29; p=0.01), contrary to those patients with over two days of hospitalization (OR 4.11; p<0.01) and those who entered surgery with a urinary catheter (OR 12.35; p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Those patients that only received a single dose of antibiotic before TURBT may have an increased risk of re-hospitalization due to fever in comparison to those who received prolonged antibiotic protocols. In addition, there are perioperative factors in this surgery that predict the risk of infectious complications.

Evaluation of the risk factors associated with the development of post-transurethral resection of the prostate persistent bacteriuria

Objectives

To determine the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors that influence the development of persistent post-transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) urinary tract infection (UTI) defined as pyuria and/or bacteriuria remaining for 3 weeks after surgery.

Patients and methods

This is a prospective study including 100 patients scheduled for TURP. Urine analysis and culture was performed immediately after catheter removal, then at 1 and 3 weeks postoperatively, and the results were correlated to various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative potential risk factors to detect any significant relation to persistent UTI.

Results

There was a statistically significant relationship between bacteriuria and the following risk factors: old age, past history of diabetes mellitus, large prostatic size, positive preoperative urine analysis and culture, preoperative catheter use, previous urological interventions, large size of sheath, long duration of operation, postoperative catheter events and postoperative manual wash.

Conclusions

Many risk factors have been found to contribute to the development of post-TURP UTI and avoiding these factors can enhance recovery of patients undergoing TURP.

Mulitcenter study on antibiotic prophylaxis, infectious complications and risk assessment in TUR-P

INTRODUCTION

Transurethral resection of the prostate is one of the most frequent urological procedures. Urinary tract infections represent major sequelae, but data about antibiotic prophylaxis in TUR-P are controversial and outdated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of TUR-P in ten German hospitals. Primary endpoints were epidemiological and outcome data of TUR-P. Secondary endpoints were the identification of factors associated with febrile UTIs and sepsis after TUR-P.

RESULTS

We included 444 patients with a median age of 71.0 years. Nearly every patient (93.5%) received some kind of antibiotic prophylaxis. Complication rates were 4.9% for febrile UTIs and 2.3% sepsis. Significant risk factors associated with febrile UTIs were pre-existing risk factors for UTIs (p = 0.035) and a duration of catheterization of more than three days (p <0.0001). Significant risk factors for sepsis were duration of surgery of more than 60 minutes (p = 0.030) and again a duration of catheterization of more than three days (p <0.0001). Interestingly, 50.8% of the cases had evidence of chronic prostatitis in their histological specimen. This evidence of chronic prostatitis was significantly associated with febrile UTIs (p = 0.019) and sepsis (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of catheterization is one of the major risk factors for infectious complications after TUR-P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in TUR-P needs prospective investigation. These future studies should also address chronic prostatitis a priori.

A prospective Korean multicenter study for infectious complications in patients undergoing prostate surgery: risk factors and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis

This multicenter study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis and identify the risk factors for infectious complications after prostate surgery in Korean patients. A total of 424 patients who underwent surgery of the prostate were reviewed. All patients underwent urinalysis and urine culture preoperatively and postoperatively. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis and risk factors for infectious complications were investigated. Infectious complications were observed in 34.9% of all patients. Factors independently associated with infectious complications were diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.09-3.65, P=0.025) and operation time (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13, P=0.004). Clinicians should be aware of the high risk of infectious complications in patients with diabetes and those who undergo a prolonged operation time. Neither the type nor duration of prophylactic antibiotics resulted in differences in infectious complications.