1
|
Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Haidl F, Pfister D. [When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?]. Urologe A 2018; 56:627-636. [PMID: 28432399 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0385-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection of metastases represents an integral part of curative management in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT). Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for low volume metastases in clinical stages I-IIB has to be differentiated from the more complex and more extensive postchemotherapeutic procedures. In Europe, primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for clinical stage I nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) plays a subordinate. In clinical stage IIA/B, nsRPLND is indicated for patients with marker-negative metastases in whom cure rates of about 65% can be achieved with surgery alone. For clinical stage IIA/B seminomas, nsRPLND represents an individual, still experimental procedure with high cure rates. Postchemotherapy residual tumor resection (pRTR) for advanced seminomas is only indicated in the context of a FDG-PET/CT-positive residual mass >3 cm in diameter. For NSGCT, pRTR is indicated in patients with residual masses >1 cm and negative or plateauing tumor markers to resect persisting teratoma or vital cancer. Complete resection of all masses including resection of adjacent vascular, visceral or skeletal metastases is mandatory to achieving the highest cure rate possible. Due to the complexity and the lower rate of significant morbidity and mortality, these procedures should be done at tertiary referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro - Onkologie, Roboter-assistierte und Spezielle Urologische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - P Paffenholz
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro - Onkologie, Roboter-assistierte und Spezielle Urologische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - F Haidl
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro - Onkologie, Roboter-assistierte und Spezielle Urologische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - D Pfister
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro - Onkologie, Roboter-assistierte und Spezielle Urologische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lieng H, Warde P, Bedard P, Hamilton RJ, Hansen AR, Jewett MAS, O'malley M, Sweet J, Chung P. Recommendations for followup of stage I and II seminoma: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre approach. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 12:59-66. [PMID: 29381453 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Testicular seminoma most commonly affects young men and is associated with favourable prognosis. Various followup schedules and imaging protocols for testicular seminoma have been described without overall consensus. We reviewed the literature together with our experience at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and present an evidence-based followup approach for patients with stage I and II seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester Lieng
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martin O'malley
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joan Sweet
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harada KI, Miyake H, Ogawa T, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M. Oncological Outcomes in Japanese Men Undergoing Orchiectomy for Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Tumor. Curr Urol 2016; 8:84-90. [PMID: 26889123 DOI: 10.1159/000365695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to retrospectively review oncological outcomes in patients with stage I testicular germ cell tumor (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study included 265 consecutive Japanese men undergoing orchiectomy for stage I testicular GCT, and a retrospective review of their records was performed. RESULTS Of these 265 patients, 192 and 73 were pathologically classified with seminoma and nonseminoma, respectively. Prophylactic radiation and chemotherapy were performed in 62 patients with seminoma and 6 with nonseminoma, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 12 seminoma patients, of whom 11 had not received prophylactic radiation therapy; however, all 12 achieved a complete response to bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin therapy. Of the nonseminoma patients, 19 experienced disease recurrence and were then treated with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin followed additionally by the surgical resection of residual tumors and salvage chemotherapy in 7 and 4, respectively. There was no cancer-specific death in the 265 patients, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in patients with seminoma and nonseminoma were 92.6 and 72.8%, respectively. Furthermore, following factors appeared to be significantly associated with recurrence-free survival in these patients: age, T classification, microvascular invasion and adjuvant therapy for those with seminoma, and microvascular invasion for those with nonseminoma. CONCLUSIONS Despite a generally favorable prognosis in Japanese men with stage I testicular GCT, intensive follow-up or prophylactic therapy should be considered for men with possible risk factors of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken-Ichi Harada
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takayoshi Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Himeji, Japan
| | - Taka-Aki Inoue
- Department of Urology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hafeez S, Singhera M, Huddart R. Exploration of the treatment challenges in men with intellectual difficulties and testicular cancer as seen in Down syndrome: single centre experience. BMC Med 2015; 13:152. [PMID: 26123546 PMCID: PMC4485877 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder in humans as well as the most common cause of inherited intellectual disability. A spectrum of physical and functional disability is associated with the syndrome as well as a predisposition to developing particular malignancies, including testicular cancers. These tumours ordinarily have a high cure rate even in widely disseminated disease. However, individuals with Down syndrome may have learning difficulties, behavioural problems, and multiple systemic complications that have the potential to make standard treatment more risky and necessitates individualized approach in order to avoid unacceptable harm. There is also suggestion that tumours may have a different natural history. Further, people with learning disabilities have often experienced poorer healthcare than the general population. In order to address these inequalities, legislation, professional bodies, and charities provide guidance; however, ultimately, consideration of the person in the context of their own psychosocial issues, comorbidities, and possible treatment strategies is vital in delivering optimal care. We aim to present a review of our own experience of delivering individualized care to this group of patients in order to close the existing health inequality gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaista Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK. .,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
| | - Mausam Singhera
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Robert Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmed KA, Wilder RB. Stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma treated postorchiectomy with radiation therapy versus other approaches: a population-based analysis of 241 patients. Int Braz J Urol 2015; 41:78-85. [PMID: 25928512 PMCID: PMC4752059 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.01.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 05/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate post-orchiectomy utilization of radiation therapy (RT) versus other management approaches in stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma patients. Materials and Methods Two hundred and forty-one patients with stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma were identified between 1988 and 2003 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Median follow-up was 10 years. Patients with stage IIA disease underwent RT more frequently than those with stage IIB disease (72% vs. 46%, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant change in RT utilization for stage IIA or IIB disease between 1988 and 2003 (P = 0.89). Conclusions Between 1988 and 2003, stage IIA patients underwent RT more often than stage IIB patients in the United States. There was no significant change in RT utilization for stage IIA or IIB disease during this time period. Based on reports describing excellent progression-free survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, this approach has increased in popularity since 2003 and may eventually become the most popular treatment approach for both stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Richard B Wilder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stein ME, Zidan J, Charas T, Ben-Yosef R. Radiotherapy for Stage IIA seminoma: The Northern Israel Oncology Center Experience, 1971-2010. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2014; 19:281-6. [PMID: 25184051 PMCID: PMC4150093 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2013] [Revised: 01/31/2014] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate treatment details, outcome, relapse rate and side-effects in Stage IIA seminoma irradiated and followed for a period of 39 years. BACKGROUND Seminoma is a very radiosensitive disease and radiation therapy alone is able to achieve long-term disease-free survival, even in advanced Stage disease. Due to the lack of long-term prospective studies, it is of value to follow patients and try to determine the appropriate volume to be irradiated and the dose which can achieve total cure with minimal acute and chronic side-effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 24 Stage IIA seminoma patients irradiated between 1971 and 2010 was performed. All patients underwent orchiectomy and meticulous clinical, biochemical and radiological staging. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 36 years and median follow-up was 84 months. A majority of patients received the "hockey-stick" irradiation schedule (para-aortic lymph nodes and hemi-pelvis) to a total dose of 2250-2500 cGy and a boost to radiologically involved nodes of 500-1000 cGy. Treatment was well-tolerated. Twenty-one (88%) patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Two patients died due to unknown causes, while one patient died due to head of the pancreas carcinoma, most probably radiation-induced. CONCLUSIONS In Stage II seminoma, radiotherapy can provide excellent results with low rates of toxicity. Reduction of total dose and size of fields without affecting the good results should be considered. Due to prolonged survival, awareness of second primary tumor is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe E. Stein
- The Northern Israel Oncology Center, Rambam Health Care Campus and Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Jamal Zidan
- Department of Oncology, Safed Medical Center, Safed, and Israel Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
| | - Tomer Charas
- The Northern Israel Oncology Center, Rambam Health Care Campus and Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rahamim Ben-Yosef
- The Northern Israel Oncology Center, Rambam Health Care Campus and Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stein ME, Charas T, Drumea K, Sabo E, Ben-Yosef R. Spermatocytic variant of classic seminoma: a report of five cases and a brief review of the literature. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2014; 5:e0021. [PMID: 25120921 PMCID: PMC4128592 DOI: 10.5041/rmmj.10155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spermatocytic seminoma is a rare testicular malignancy, appearing in the adult population. It has a good prognosis and a low rate of metastatic potential. OBJECTIVES We present five cases diagnosed and treated with radiotherapy at Rambam Health Care Campus in Haifa, Israel. METHODS Between 1974 and 1996, five patients with stage I spermatocytic seminoma were referred post-orchiectomy to the Northern Israel Oncology Center. All five patients presented with the typical pathological features of the spermatocytic variant of classic seminoma, and all were staged clinically and radiologically. RESULTS Mean age at diagnosis was 44 years (range 30-58 years). Main symptoms included a palpable testicular mass and/or testicular enlargement. Mean duration of symptoms was 9 months (range 0.5-24 months). Three patients were irradiated to the para-aortic/ipsilateral iliacal lymph nodes (mean total dose 2,500 cGy), one patient with 4,000 cGy. One patient was irradiated to the bilateral iliacal lymph nodes (2,600 cGy). With a median follow-up of 15 years, four patients are alive with no evidence of disease or severe late side effects. One patient developed severe lymphedema and symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, stage IIA prostate carcinoma (hormonal and brachytherapy treatment) and a non-secretory hypophyseal adenoma (surgically removed); he died at the age of 75 due to severe peripheral vascular and coronary heart disease with no evidence of his first or second primaries. CONCLUSIONS Prognosis is excellent and does not differ from classic seminoma. As in the accumulated experience in early-stage, low-risk classic seminoma, we suggest surveillance as the preferred policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe E. Stein
- Northern Israel Oncology Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| | - Tomer Charas
- Pathology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel and
| | - Karen Drumea
- Pathology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel and
| | - Edmund Sabo
- Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Endo T, Kawai K, Kamba T, Inai H, Uchida K, Miyazaki J, Kamoto T, Ogawa O, Nishiyama H. Risk factors for loss to follow-up during active surveillance of patients with Stage I seminoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44:355-9. [PMID: 24558127 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyu001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the patterns and risk factors for loss to follow-up during active surveillance for Stage I seminoma. METHODS A total of 425 cases with Stage I seminoma underwent radical orchiectomy from 1985 to 2006 at 25 Japanese institutions, including 22 community hospitals and 3 university hospitals. The post-orchiectomy management selected was active surveillance for 186 patients, adjuvant radiotherapy for 182 patients and chemotherapy for 57 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the recurrence-free survival and loss to follow-up rate. The risk factors for loss to follow-up were examined using Cox's proportional hazards model with multiple variables. RESULTS The 2-, 5- and 10-year loss to follow-up rates in the active surveillance group were 14.2, 37.8 and 71.3%, respectively, which were not significantly different in comparison with those in the active surveillance and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy groups. With regard to the active surveillance group, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients younger than 36 years at diagnosis, patients diagnosed since 2000 and patients treated at hospitals that enrolled more than 10 cases had a significant risk for loss to follow-up. No significant correlation between the loss to follow-up rate and pathological risk factors such as tumor size (≤4 versus >4 cm) and rete testis invasion (presence versus absence) was shown. CONCLUSIONS The loss to follow-up rates beyond 5 years were unsatisfactorily high during active surveillance. Further approaches to improve the quality of active surveillance are needed, especially for high-risk patients such as those of younger age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Endo
- *Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Seminona of stage I: strategies compared]. Urologia 2014; 80:207-11. [PMID: 24526597 DOI: 10.5301/ru.2013.11546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Testicular cancer is an infrequent disease, accounting for 1% to 2% of all malignant
neoplasms in men. However, it represents the most common solid malignancy among men between 15 and 35 years old.
The standard initial treatment for stage I seminoma is radical inguinal orchiectomy. Since the mid-20th century, the traditional treatment after surgery had consisted in external photon beam radiotherapy directed to the para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes. Patients receiving radiotherapy achieve cause-specific survival rates approaching 100%, with virtually no relapses within the radiation portal.
At the moment, the options for the management of stage I seminoma consist of surveillance, adjuvant radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy usually done with carboplatin. Patients should be informed of all treatment options and of potential benefits and side effects of each choice.
Significant treatment-related morbidities following radiotherapy have been reported. Acute toxicities are generally mild and self-timing, but patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone had a significantly increased risk of second primary malignances (SPMs) and gonadal toxicity.
The Medical Research Council (MRC) TE10 and TE18 randomized trials have investigated the reduction of the treatment volume and total dose to decrease the risk of radiation-related side effects.
The MRC TE19 randomized trial compared radiotherapy and a single course of carboplatin AUC7. The preliminary results, reported in 2005, and also the updated results, reported in 2008 and 2011, confirm the non inferiority of single-dose carboplatin.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stein ME, Drumea K, Charas T, Gershuny A, Ben-Yosef R. Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Primary Advanced Seminoma-a Retrospective Analysis: Treatment Results at the Northern Israel Oncology Center (1989-2010). Rambam Maimonides Med J 2014; 5:e0005. [PMID: 24498512 PMCID: PMC3904480 DOI: 10.5041/rmmj.10139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over the past 30 years, great strides have been made in the treatment of disseminated testicular tumors. Despite the low number of patients and the rarity of studies concerning primary advanced seminoma, the efficacy of chemotherapy is clear, mainly 3-4-cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Aiming to contribute to the understanding and implementation of proper chemotherapeutic management in advanced seminoma patients, we retrospectively summarized our experience with 26 patients who were referred for platinum-based chemotherapy, post-orchiectomy to the Northern Israel Oncology Center between 1989 and 2010. Response rate, side effects, and long-term outcome were investigated. METHODS Before chemotherapy, meticulous staging was done, including tumor markers (B-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)), and abdominal and pelvic computerized tomography (CT) scans were carried out. RESULTS All 26 treated patients achieved complete remission, clinically and symptomatically, with normalization of their CT scans. At a median follow-up of 120 months (range, 24-268 months) all patients are alive, without evidence of recurrent disease. One patient whose disease recurred twice achieved a third complete remission following salvage treatment with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation. Another patient, who preferred surveillance, relapsed abdominally after 9 months but achieved long-standing complete remission with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Both these patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Three patients recovered uneventfully from bleomycin-induced pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS Advanced seminoma is a highly curable disease using platinum-based chemotherapy. Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe E. Stein
- Northern Israel Oncology Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel and
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| | - Karen Drumea
- Northern Israel Oncology Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel and
| | - Tomer Charas
- Northern Israel Oncology Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel and
| | - Anthony Gershuny
- Department of Clinical Oncology & Radiation Therapy, Queen’s Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK
| | - Rahamim Ben-Yosef
- Northern Israel Oncology Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel and
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Horwich A, Dearnaley D, Sohaib A, Pennert K, Huddart R. Neoadjuvant carboplatin before radiotherapy in stage IIA and IIB seminoma. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2104-7. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
13
|
Kobayashi K, Saito T, Kitamura Y, Nobushita T, Kawasaki T, Hara N, Takahashi K. Oncological outcomes in patients with stage I testicular seminoma and nonseminoma: pathological risk factors for relapse and feasibility of surveillance after orchiectomy. Diagn Pathol 2013; 8:57. [PMID: 23566361 PMCID: PMC3632495 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2012] [Accepted: 04/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surveillance after orchiectomy has recently been a management option in patients with stage I seminoma, while it remains controversial in those with stage I nonseminoma, and the risk factor associated with relapse is still a matter of concern in both entities. This study was performed to explore pathological risk factors for post-orchiectomy relapse in patients with stage I seminoma and nonseminoma, and to assess oncological outcomes in those managed with surveillance. Methods In this single institution study, 118 and 40 consecutive patients with stage I seminoma and nonseminoma were reviewed, respectively. Of the 118 patients with stage I seminoma, 56 and one received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively, and 61 were managed with surveillance. Of the 40 men with stage I nonseminoma, 4 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 36 were managed with surveillance. Results No patient had cause-specific death during the mean observation period of 104 and 99 months in men with seminoma and nonseminoma, respectively. In men with stage I seminoma, 1 (1.7%) receiving radiotherapy and 4 (6.6%) men managed with surveillance had disease relapse; the 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 93.4% in men managed with surveillance, and their RFS was not different from that in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (logrank P=0.15). Patients with tunica albuginea involvement showed a poorer RFS than those without (10-year RFS rate 80.0% vs. 94.1%), although the difference was of borderline significance (P=0.09). In men with stage I nonseminoma, 9 (22.5%) patients experienced relapse. Patients with lymphovascular invasion seemingly had a poorer RFS than those without; 40.0% and 18.7% of the patients with and without lymphovascular invasion had disease relapse, respectively, although the difference was not significant (logrank P=0.17). Conclusion In both men with stage I seminoma and nonseminoma, surveillance after orchiectomy is a feasible option. However, disease extension through tunica albuginea might be a factor associated with disease relapse in patients with organ-confined seminoma, and those with stage I nonseminoma showing lymphovascular invasion may possibly be at high risk for disease relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Kawagishi-cho 2, Niigata 951-8566, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pichler R, Leonhartsberger N, Stöhr B, Horninger W, Steiner H. Two Cycles of Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Low-Volume Stage II Seminoma: Results of a Retrospective, Single-Center Case Series. Chemotherapy 2012; 58:405-10. [DOI: 10.1159/000345701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2012] [Accepted: 11/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
15
|
Vega A, Baptissart M, Caira F, Brugnon F, Lobaccaro JMA, Volle DH. Epigenetic: a molecular link between testicular cancer and environmental exposures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012; 3:150. [PMID: 23230429 PMCID: PMC3515880 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, studies in rodents have highlighted links between in utero and/or neonatal exposures to molecules that alter endocrine functions and the development of genital tract abnormalities, such as cryptorchidism, hypospadias, and impaired spermatogenesis. Most of these molecules, called endocrine disrupters exert estrogenic and/or antiandrogenic activities. These data led to the hypothesis of the testicular dysgenesis syndrome which postulates that these disorders are one clinical entity and are linked by epidemiological and pathophysiological relations. Furthermore, infertility has been stated as a risk factor for testicular cancer (TC). The incidence of TC has been increasing over the past decade. Most of testicular germ cell cancers develop through a pre-invasive carcinoma in situ from fetal germ cells (primordial germ cell or gonocyte). During their development, fetal germ cells undergo epigenetic modifications. Interestingly, several lines of evidence have shown that gene regulation through epigenetic mechanisms (DNA and histone modifications) plays an important role in normal development as well as in various diseases, including TC. Here we will review chromatin modifications which can affect testicular physiology leading to the development of TC; and highlight potential molecular pathways involved in these alterations in the context of environmental exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelie Vega
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marine Baptissart
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Françoise Caira
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Florence Brugnon
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jean-Marc A. Lobaccaro
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
| | - David H. Volle
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103Aubière, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France
- Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293Aubière, France
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’AuvergneClermont-Ferrand, France
- *Correspondence: David H. Volle, Génétique Reproduction et Développement, INSERM U 1103, CNRS, UMR 6293, Clermont Université, 24 avenue des Landais, BP 80026, 63171 Aubière Cedex, France. e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|