1
|
Lucocq J, Barron E, Holmes H, Donnelly PD, Cruickshank N. Optimising the use of colonoscopy to improve risk stratification for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: A decision-curve analysis. Scott Med J 2024:369330241266080. [PMID: 39043377 DOI: 10.1177/00369330241266080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pressured healthcare resources make risk stratification and patient prioritisation fundamental issues for the investigation of colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic patients. The present study uses machine learning algorithms and decision strategies to improve the appropriate use of colonoscopy. DESIGN All symptomatic patients in a single health board (2018-2021) proceeding to colonoscopy to investigate for CRC were included. Machine learning algorithms (NeuralNetwork, randomForest, Logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes and Adaboost) were used to risk-stratify patients for CRC using demographics, symptoms, quantitative faecal immunochemical test (qFIT) and haematological tests. Decision curve analyses were performed to determine the optimal decision strategies. RESULTS 3776 patients were included (median age, 65; M:F,0.9:1.0) and CRC was identified in 217 patients (5.7%). qFIT > 400 μg Hb/g was the most important variable (%IncMSE = 78.5). RandomForrest had the highest area under curve (0.91) and accuracy (0.80) for CRC. When utilising decision curve analysis (DCA), 30%, 46% and 54% of colonoscopies were saved at accepted CRC probabilities of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively. RandomForrest modelling had superior net clinical benefit compared to default colonoscopy strategies. CONCLUSIONS MLA-derived decision strategies that account for patient and referrer risk preference reduce colonoscopy demand and carry net clinical benefit compared to default colonoscopy strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lucocq
- Department of Colorectal Disease, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Emma Barron
- Department of Colorectal Disease, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Heather Holmes
- Department of Colorectal Disease, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | | | - Neil Cruickshank
- Department of Colorectal Disease, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abreu-Gomez J, Lim C, Haider MA. Contemporary Approach to Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System Score 3 Lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:37-51. [PMID: 37973244 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the technical and clinical considerations encountered with PI-RADS 3 lesions, which are equivocal for clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) with detection rates ranging between 10% and 35%. The number of PI-RADS 3 lesions reported vary according to several factors including MRI quality and radiologist training/expertise among the most influential. PI-RADS v.2.1 updated definitions for scores 2 and 3 in the PZ and scores 1 and 2 in the TZ is reviewed. The role of DWI role is highlighted in the assessment of the TZ with the possibility of upgrading score 2 lesions to score 3 based on DWI score. Given the increased utilization for prostate MRI, biparametric MRI can be considered as an alternative for low-risk patients where there is a need to rule out csPCa acknowledging this technique may increase the number of indeterminate cases going for biopsies. Management of patients with equivocal lesions at mpMRI and factors influencing biopsy decision process remain as an unmet need and additional studies using molecular/imaging markers as well as artificial intelligence tools are needed to further address their role in proper patient selection for biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Abreu-Gomez
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Christopher Lim
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room AB 279, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System and the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Sinai Health System, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X5
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomas J, Atluri S, Zucker I, Reis I, Kwon D, Kim E, Tewari A, Patel V, Wagaskar V, Konety B, Kasraeian A, Czarniecki S, Thoreson G, Soodana-Prakash N, Ritch C, Nahar B, Gonzalgo M, Kava B, Parekh D, Punnen S. A multi-institutional study of 1,111 men with 4K score, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and prostate biopsy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:430.e9-430.e16. [PMID: 37544833 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarkers are often used in conjunction to enhance the selection process for prostate biopsy. However, the optimal sequence of ordering these tests has not been established. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted on a large multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent MRI, 4K score, and biopsy of the prostate to examine the impact of utilizing both tests vs. either test alone and to determine if the order in which these tests are administered affects the ability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated men from 8 different institutions who were referred for prostate cancer evaluation and underwent MRI, 4K score test, and prostate biopsy. The primary outcome was the presence of csCaP, defined as grade group 2 or higher cancer on a biopsy of the prostate. We used logistic regression, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis to evaluate using a 4K score or MRI alone vs. both tests together for detecting csCaP. In addition, we evaluated several strategies using one or both tests for selecting men for biopsy and compared them based on the proportion of biopsies avoided and the csCaP's missed. RESULTS Among the 1,111 men who formed the final cohort, 553 (49.8%) had prostate cancer, and 353 (31.8%) had csCaP. We found that using MRI and 4K score together had better discrimination, calibration, and a higher clinical utility on decision curve analysis compared to using either test individually. Using both tests together resulted in fewer biopsies avoided and missed cancers compared to using either test alone. Strategies that sequence MRI and 4K score tests resulted in the largest biopsy reduction, with no appreciable difference between starting with an MRI vs. a biomarker. CONCLUSIONS We found that using both an MRI and 4K score together was superior to using either test alone but found no appreciable difference between starting with an MRI vs. starting with a 4K score. Prospective studies are needed to identify the best strategy to sequence MRI and biomarkers in the evaluation of csCaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Thomas
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Shrikanth Atluri
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Isaac Zucker
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Isildinha Reis
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Eric Kim
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Vipul Patel
- Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration Health, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL
| | - Vinayak Wagaskar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Stefan Czarniecki
- HIFU Clinic, Department of Urology, St. Elizabeth Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Chad Ritch
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Bruno Nahar
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Mark Gonzalgo
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Bruce Kava
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Dipen Parekh
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salciccia S, Capriotti AL, Laganà A, Fais S, Logozzi M, De Berardinis E, Busetto GM, Di Pierro GB, Ricciuti GP, Del Giudice F, Sciarra A, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Sciarra B, Maggi M. Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Current Knowledge to the Role of Metabolomics and Exosomes. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22094367. [PMID: 33922033 PMCID: PMC8122596 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Early detection of prostate cancer (PC) is largely carried out using assessment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level; yet it cannot reliably discriminate between benign pathologies and clinically significant forms of PC. To overcome the current limitations of PSA, new urinary and serum biomarkers have been developed in recent years. Although several biomarkers have been explored in various scenarios and patient settings, to date, specific guidelines with a high level of evidence on the use of these markers are lacking. Recent advances in metabolomic, genomics, and proteomics have made new potential biomarkers available. A number of studies focused on the characterization of the specific PC metabolic phenotype using different experimental approaches has been recently reported; yet, to date, research on metabolomic application for PC has focused on a small group of metabolites that have been known to be related to the prostate gland. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that are secreted from all mammalian cells and virtually detected in all bio-fluids, thus allowing their use as tumor biomarkers. Thanks to a general improvement of the technical equipment to analyze exosomes, we are able to obtain reliable quantitative and qualitative information useful for clinical application. Although some pilot clinical investigations have proposed potential PC biomarkers, data are still preliminary and non-conclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Salciccia
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| | - Anna Laura Capriotti
- Department of Chemistry, Sapienza Rome University, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.L.C.); (A.L.); (B.S.)
| | - Aldo Laganà
- Department of Chemistry, Sapienza Rome University, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.L.C.); (A.L.); (B.S.)
| | - Stefano Fais
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.F.); (M.L.)
| | - Mariantonia Logozzi
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.F.); (M.L.)
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, 71122 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| | - Gian Piero Ricciuti
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0649974201; Fax: +39-0649970284
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (P.R.C.); (M.R.C.)
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (P.R.C.); (M.R.C.)
| | - Beatrice Sciarra
- Department of Chemistry, Sapienza Rome University, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.L.C.); (A.L.); (B.S.)
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (E.D.B.); (G.B.D.P.); (G.P.R.); (F.D.G.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cerrato A, Bedia C, Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Gentile V, Maggi M, Montone CM, Piovesana S, Sciarra A, Tauler R, Laganà A. Untargeted metabolomics of prostate cancer zwitterionic and positively charged compounds in urine. Anal Chim Acta 2021; 1158:338381. [PMID: 33863412 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, principally occurs in over 50-year-old men. Nowadays there is urgency to discover biomarkers alternative to prostate-specific antigen, as it cannot discriminate patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia from clinically significant forms of prostatic cancer. In the present paper, 32 benign prostatic hyperplasia and 41 prostatic cancer urine samples were collected and analyzed. Polar and positively charged metabolites were therein investigated using an analytical platform comprising an up to 40-fold analyte enrichment step by graphitized carbon black solid-phase extraction, HILIC separation, and untargeted high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis. These classes of compounds are often neglected in common metabolomics experiments even though previous studies reported their significance in cancer biomarker discovery. The complex metabolomics big datasets, generated by the UHPLC-HRMS, were analyzed with the ROIMCR procedure, based on the selection of the MS regions of interest data and their analysis by the Multivariate Curve-Resolution Alternating Least Squares chemometrics method. This approach allowed the resolution and tentative identification of the metabolites differentially expressed by the two data sets. Among these, amino acids and carnitine derivatives were tentatively identified highlighting the importance of the proposed methodology for cancer biomarker research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cerrato
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Bedia
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Laura Capriotti
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
| | - Chiara Cavaliere
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Gentile
- Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologio-ostetriche e Scienze Urologiche, Sapienza Università, di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologio-ostetriche e Scienze Urologiche, Sapienza Università, di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmela Maria Montone
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Susy Piovesana
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologio-ostetriche e Scienze Urologiche, Sapienza Università, di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Roma Tauler
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aldo Laganà
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy; CNR NANOTEC, Campus Ecotekne, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qin Z, Yao J, Xu L, Xu Z, Ge Y, Zhou L, Zhao F, Jia R. Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46:691-704. [PMID: 31961625 PMCID: PMC7822358 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic value and suitability of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) have been inconsistent in previous studies. Thus, the aim of the present meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of PCA3 for PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS A meta-analysis was performed to search relevant studies using online databases EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science published until February 1st, 2019. Ultimately, 65 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis with 8.139 cases and 14.116 controls. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (LR+), negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and other measures of PCA3 were pooled and determined to evaluate the diagnostic rate of PCa by the random-effect model. RESULTS With PCA3, the pooled overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predicting significant PCa were 0.68 (0.64-0.72), 0.72 (0.68-0.75), 2.41 (2.16-2.69), 0.44 (0.40-0.49), respectively. Besides, the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% CIs for PCA3 was 5.44 (4.53-6.53). In addition, the area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and 95% CIs was 0.76 (0.72-0.79). The major design deficiencies of included studies were differential verification bias, and a lack of clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS The results of this meta-analysis suggested that PCA3 was a non-invasive method with the acceptable sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PCa, to distinguish between patients and healthy individuals. To validate the potential applicability of PCA3 in the diagnosis of PCa, more rigorous studies were needed to confirm these conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Qin
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianxiang Yao
- Department of Urology, Huzhou first people's hospital, Huzhou, China
| | - Luwei Xu
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuzheng Ge
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Liuhua Zhou
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ruipeng Jia
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Norris JM, Simpson BS, Parry MA, Allen C, Ball R, Freeman A, Kelly D, Kim HL, Kirkham A, You S, Kasivisvanathan V, Whitaker HC, Emberton M. Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020; 20:37-47. [PMID: 33000006 PMCID: PMC7497895 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detects most, but not all, clinically significant prostate cancer. The genetic basis of prostate cancer visibility and invisibility on mpMRI remains uncertain. Objective To systematically review the literature on differential gene expression between mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible prostate cancer, and to use bioinformatic analysis to identify enriched processes or cellular components in genes validated in more than one study. Evidence acquisition We performed a systematic literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to January 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary endpoint was differential genetic features between mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible tumours. Secondary endpoints were explanatory links between gene function and mpMRI conspicuity, and the prognostic value of differential gene enrichment. Evidence synthesis We retrieved 445 articles, of which 32 met the criteria for inclusion. Thematic synthesis from the included studies showed that mpMRI-visible cancer tended towards enrichment of molecular features associated with increased disease aggressivity, including phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) loss and higher genomic classifier scores, such as Oncotype and Decipher. Three of the included studies had accompanying publicly available data suitable for further bioinformatic analysis. An over-representation analysis of these datasets revealed increased expression of genes associated with extracellular matrix components in mpMRI-visible tumours. Conclusions Prostate cancer that is visible on mpMRI is generally enriched with molecular features of tumour development and aggressivity, including activation of proliferative signalling, DNA damage, and inflammatory processes. Additionally, there appears to be concordant cellular components and biological processes associated with mpMRI conspicuity, as highlighted by bioinformatic analysis of large genetic datasets. Patient summary Prostate cancer that is detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tends to have genetic features that are associated with more aggressive disease. This suggests that MRI can be used to assess the likelihood of aggressive prostate cancer, based on tumour visibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,London Deanery of Urology, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin S Simpson
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marina A Parry
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rhys Ball
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | - Hyung L Kim
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sungyong You
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim L, Boxall N, George A, Burling K, Acher P, Aning J, McCracken S, Page T, Gnanapragasam VJ. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study. BMC Med 2020; 18:95. [PMID: 32299423 PMCID: PMC7164355 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01548-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical pathway to detect and diagnose prostate cancer has been revolutionised by the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI pre-biopsy). mpMRI however remains a resource-intensive test and is highly operator dependent with variable effectiveness with regard to its negative predictive value. Here we tested the use of the phi assay in standard clinical practice to pre-select men at the highest risk of harbouring significant cancer and hence refine the use of mpMRI and biopsies. METHODS A prospective five-centre study recruited men being investigated through an mpMRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Test statistics for PSA, PSA density (PSAd) and phi were assessed for detecting significant cancers using 2 definitions: ≥ Grade Group (GG2) and ≥ Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG) 3. Cost modelling and decision curve analysis (DCA) was simultaneously performed. RESULTS A total of 545 men were recruited and studied with a median age, PSA and phi of 66 years, 8.0 ng/ml and 44 respectively. Overall, ≥ GG2 and ≥ CPG3 cancer detection rates were 64% (349/545), 47% (256/545) and 32% (174/545) respectively. There was no difference across centres for patient demographics or cancer detection rates. The overall area under the curve (AUC) for predicting ≥ GG2 cancers was 0.70 for PSA and 0.82 for phi. AUCs for ≥ CPG3 cancers were 0.81 and 0.87 for PSA and phi respectively. AUC values for phi did not differ between centres suggesting reliability of the test in different diagnostic settings. Pre-referral phi cut-offs between 20 and 30 had NPVs of 0.85-0.90 for ≥ GG2 cancers and 0.94-1.0 for ≥ CPG3 cancers. A strategy of mpMRI in all and biopsy only positive lesions reduced unnecessary biopsies by 35% but missed 9% of ≥ GG2 and 5% of ≥ CPG3 cancers. Using PH ≥ 30 to rule out referrals missed 8% and 5% of ≥ GG2 and ≥ CPG3 cancers (and reduced unnecessary biopsies by 40%). This was achieved however with 25% fewer mpMRI. Pathways incorporating PSAd missed fewer cancers but necessitated more unnecessary biopsies. The phi strategy had the lowest mean costs with DCA demonstrating net clinical benefit over a range of thresholds. CONCLUSION phi as a triaging test may be an effective way to reduce mpMRI and biopsies without compromising detection of significant prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lois Kim
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas Boxall
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne George
- Urological Malignancies Programme CRUK & Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, University of Cambridge Box 193, Cambridge Biomedical Campus Cambridge CB20QQ, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keith Burling
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Core Biochemical Assay Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pete Acher
- Department of Urology, Southend Hospital, Essex, UK
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Stuart McCracken
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Toby Page
- Department of Urology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK. .,Urological Malignancies Programme CRUK & Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, University of Cambridge Box 193, Cambridge Biomedical Campus Cambridge CB20QQ, Cambridge, UK. .,Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Following detection of high levels of serum prostate-specific antigen, many men are advised to have transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in an attempt to locate a cancer. This nontargeted approach lacks accuracy and carries a small risk of potentially life-threatening sepsis. Worse still, it can detect clinically insignificant cancer cells, which are unlikely to be the origin of advanced-stage disease. The detection of these indolent cancer cells has led to overdiagnosis, one of the major problems of contemporary medicine, whereby many men with clinically insignificant disease are advised to undergo unnecessary radical surgery or radiotherapy. Advances in imaging and biomarker discovery have led to a revolution in prostate cancer diagnosis, and nontargeted prostate biopsies should become obsolete. In this Perspective article, we describe the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer, which relies on nontargeted biopsies, and the problems linked to this pathway. We then discuss the utility of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and novel tumour markers. Finally, we comment on how the incorporation of these advances into a new diagnostic pathway will affect the current risk-stratification system and explore future challenges.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stabile A, Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Villeirs G, Gill IS, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:41-61. [PMID: 31316185 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0212-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could mitigate these diagnostic errors. The performance of mpMRI can vary depending on the population being studied, the execution of the MRI itself, the experience of the radiologist, whether additional biomarkers are considered and whether mpMRI-targeted biopsy is carried out alone or in addition to systematic biopsy. A number of challenges to implementation remain, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. Nevertheless, emerging clinical trial data support the adoption of this technology as part of the standard of care for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Stabile
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhen L, Liu X, Yegang C, Yongjiao Y, Yawei X, Jiaqi K, Xianhao W, Yuxuan S, Rui H, Wei Z, Ningjing O. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1244. [PMID: 31870327 PMCID: PMC6929472 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The application of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for diagnosis of prostate cancer has been recommended by the European Association of Urology (EAU), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature on assessing the accuracy of mpMRI in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer. METHOD We searched Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane online databases from January 12,000 to October 272,018 to extract articles exploring the possibilities that the pre-biopsy mpMRI can enhance the diagnosis accuracy of prostate cancer. The numbers of true- and false-negative results and true- and false-positive ones were extracted to calculate the corresponding sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 tool. Random effects meta-analysis and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) plot were performed for further study. RESULTS After searching, we acquired 3741 articles for reference, of which 29 studies with 8503 participants were eligible for inclusion. MpMRI maintained impressive diagnostic value, the area under the HSROC curve was 0.87 (95%CI,0.84-0.90). The sensitivity and specificity for mpMRI were 0.87 [95%CI, 0.81-0.91] and 0.68 [95%CI,0.56-0.79] respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 2.73 [95%CI 1.90-3.90]; negative likelihood ratio was 0.19 [95% CI 0.14,-0.27]. The risk of publication bias was negligible with P = 0.96. CONCLUSION Results of the meta-analysis suggest that mpMRI is a sensitive tool to diagnose prostate cancer. However, because of the high heterogeneity existing among the included studies, further studies are needed to apply the results of this meta-analysis in clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhen
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Chen Yegang
- Department of Urology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Yongjiao
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Yawei
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Kang Jiaqi
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Wang Xianhao
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Song Yuxuan
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Hu Rui
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhang Wei
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| | - Ou Ningjing
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Optimizing patient's selection for prostate biopsy: A single institution experience with multi-parametric MRI and the 4Kscore test for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201384. [PMID: 30092002 PMCID: PMC6084850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the performance of mpMRI and the 4Kscore test together for the detection of significant prostate cancer. Material and methods We selected a consecutive series of men who were referred for evaluation of prostate cancer at an academic institution and underwent mpMRI and the 4Kscore test. The primary outcome was the presence of Gleason 7 or higher cancer on biopsy of the prostate. We used logistic regression and Decision Curve Analysis to report the discrimination and clinical utility of using mpMRI and the 4Kscore test for prostate cancer detection. We modeled the probability of harboring a Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer based on the 4Kscore test and mpMRI findings. Finally, we examined various combinations and sequences of mpMRI and the 4Kscore test and assessed the impact on biopsies avoided and cancers missed. Results Among 300 men who underwent a 4Kscore test and mpMRI, 149 (49%) underwent a biopsy. Among those, 73 (49%) had cancer, and 49 (33%) had Gleason 7 cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) for using the 4Kscore test and mpMRI together 0.82 (0.75–0.89) was superior to using the 4Kscore 0.70 (0.62–0.79) or mpMRI 0.74 (0.66–0.81) individually (p = 0.001). Similarly, decision analysis revealed the highest net benefit was achieved using both tests. Conclusions The 4Kscore test and mpMRI results provide independent, but complementary, information that enhances the prediction of higher-grade prostate cancer and improves patient’s selection for a prostate biopsy. Prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ploussard G, de la Taille A. The role of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) in prostate cancer detection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:1013-1020. [PMID: 30016891 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1502086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) score has been the first urine assay to obtain the Food and Drug Administration approval for guiding decisions regarding additional biopsies. Different aspects of this urinary assay (diagnostic performance, prognostic value, cost/benefit balance, integration with other molecular and imaging modalities) have now been well evaluated. Areas covered: This expert review will summarize current achievements and future perspectives provided by this urine biomarker. Expert commentary: The clinical benefit of the PCA3 score, in addition to the other established factors has been demonstrated before regarding biopsy decision making in men with persistent risk of prostate cancer. Its potential prognostic value also suggests its usefulness in selecting low risk patients for active surveillance protocols, however future daily-practice changing studies are needed. Economics assessment and additional value compared with other biomolecular and imaging modalities are still under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandre de la Taille
- b Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse- Oncopole , CHU Henri Mondor , APHP, Créteil , France.,c INSERM U955 Equipe 7 , Université Paris Val-de-Marne , Créteil , France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Del Monte M, Leonardo C, Salvo V, Grompone MD, Pecoraro M, Stanzione A, Campa R, Vullo F, Sciarra A, Catalano C, Panebianco V. MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy: performing exclusively targeted biopsies for the early detection of prostate cancer. Radiol Med 2017; 123:227-234. [PMID: 29075977 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0825-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to validate the role of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy as a first diagnostic modality in subjects with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS 108 men (age range 46-78 years) with clinical suspicion for PCa (PSA > 4 ng/mL) underwent multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) and, when suspicious lesion were found (according to the PIRADSv2 scoring system), targeted biopsy was performed. All patients without significant alteration patterns at mpMRI have been referred for follow-up at 1 year. RESULTS 91/108 patients showed on the mpMRI highly suspicious lesions (PIRADS 4 and 5); the remaining 17/108 patients revealed no significant alteration consistent with PCa (PIRADS 3). Among the first group of patients, 58/91 proved to be positive for PCa on the pathology report: 24 patients had a Gleason Score (GS) 6 (3 + 3); 18 patients GS 7 of which 7 (3 + 4) and 11 (4 + 3); 14 patients GS 8 (4 + 4); two patients GS 9 (5 + 4); 33 proved to be negative. Overall cancer detection rate (CDR) was 63%. However, the CDR rises significantly, up to 77%, after the 53 initial consecutive biopsies that were performed (p < 0,05) and thus identified as part of the learning curve. Patients of the second group (17/108) have been followed with serial PSA assessments, clinical reevaluation, and follow-up mpMRI. CONCLUSION Performing exclusively targeted MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided biopsies for the diagnosis of PCa in patients with suspicious PSA levels (> 4 ng/mL) increases the detection rate of clinically significant cancer, changing both the therapeutic options and the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Del Monte
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Salvo
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Domenico Grompone
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Pecoraro
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Stanzione
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campa
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Vullo
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Catalano
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Prostate Unit-Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Okcelik S, Soydan H, Ates F, Berber U, Saygin H, Sonmez G, Karademir K. Evaluation of PCA3 and multiparametric MRI's: collective benefits before deciding initial prostate biopsy for patients with PSA level between 3-10ng/mL. Int Braz J Urol 2017; 42:449-55. [PMID: 27286106 PMCID: PMC4920560 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.0155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2015] [Accepted: 06/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze the contribution of multiparametric MRI and PCA3 assay, pre- decision of initial biopsy in PSA level between 3-10 ng/mL patients with normal digital rectal examination(DRE). Materials and Methods PSA level 3-10 ng/mL ,patients, with normal DRE results and no previous prostate biopsy history, were included in this study. Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI one week before biopsy. Urine sample taking for PCA3 examination preceded the biopsy. Systematic and targeted biopsies were conducted. Patients with high PSA levels were seperated into two groups as: high PCA3 scored and low PCA3 scored. Then each group was divided into two sub-groups as: MRI lesion positive and negative. Tumor incidence, positive predictive values(PPV) and negative predictive values(NPV) were calculated. Results 53 patients were included between February 2013 and March 2014.Mean age 61.22 ± 1.06. Mean PSA value 5.13 ± 0.19 ng / mL. Mean PCA3 score 98.01 ± 23.13 and mean prostate size was 48.96 ± 2.67 grams. Fourty nine patients had both PCA3 score and multiparametric MRI. The PCA3’s PPV value was 58.33%. If multiparametric MRI lesions are added to high PCA3 scores , the PPV appears to elevate to 91.66%. NPV of PCA3 was 96%. NPV was 95% when there was no lesion in the multiparametric MRI with low PCA3 scores. Sensitivity was 91.66% , specificity was 95% respectively. Conclusion Adding multimetric MRI can also support biopsy decision for patients with high PCA3 value. When PCA3 value is low, patients can be survailled without any need to take a MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezgin Okcelik
- Department of Urology, Beytepe Military Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hasan Soydan
- Department of Urology Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Ates
- Department of Urology Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ufuk Berber
- Department of Pathology, Corlu Military Hospital, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Hasan Saygin
- Department of Radiology, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Guner Sonmez
- Department of Radiology, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kenan Karademir
- Department of Urology Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouvière O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2017; 72:250-266. [PMID: 28336078 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT It remains unclear whether patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can safely obviate prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature assessing the negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in patients with a suspicion of PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched up to February 2016. Studies reporting prebiopsy mpMRI results using transrectal or transperineal biopsy as a reference standard were included. We further selected for meta-analysis studies with at least 10-core biopsies as the reference standard, mpMRI comprising at least T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, positive mpMRI defined as a Prostate Imaging Reporting Data System/Likert score of ≥3/5 or ≥4/5, and results reported at patient level for the detection of overall PCa or clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as Gleason ≥7 cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 48 studies (9613 patients) were eligible for inclusion. At patient level, the median prevalence was 50.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 36.4-57.7%) for overall cancer and 32.9% (IQR, 28.1-37.2%) for csPCa. The median mpMRI NPV was 82.4% (IQR, 69.0-92.4%) for overall cancer and 88.1% (IQR, 85.7-92.3) for csPCa. NPV significantly decreased when cancer prevalence increased, for overall cancer (r=-0.64, p<0.0001) and csPCa (r=-0.75, p=0.032). Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Seven reported results for overall PCa. When the overall PCa prevalence increased from 30% to 60%, the combined NPV estimates decreased from 88% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 77-99%) to 67% (95% CI, 56-79%) for a cut-off score of 3/5. Only one study selected for meta-analysis reported results for Gleason ≥7 cancers, with a positive biopsy rate of 29.3%. The corresponding NPV for a cut-off score of ≥3/5 was 87.9%. CONCLUSIONS The NPV of mpMRI varied greatly depending on study design, cancer prevalence, and definitions of positive mpMRI and csPCa. As cancer prevalence was highly variable among series, risk stratification of patients should be the initial step before considering prebiopsy mpMRI and defining those in whom biopsy may be omitted when the mpMRI is negative. PATIENT SUMMARY This systematic review examined if multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan can be used to reliably predict the absence of prostate cancer in patients suspected of having prostate cancer, thereby avoiding a prostate biopsy. The results suggest that whilst it is a promising tool, it is not accurate enough to replace prostate biopsy in such patients, mainly because its accuracy is variable and influenced by the prostate cancer risk. However, its performance can be enhanced if there were more accurate ways of determining the risk of having prostate cancer. When such tools are available, it should be possible to use an MRI scan to avoid biopsy in patients at a low risk of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Moldovan
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Marconi
- Department of Urology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Michel Bolla
- Department of Radiation Therapy, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Tobias Gross
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cathy Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Cochrane UGPD Group, Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Verma S, Rosenkrantz AB, Choyke P, Eberhardt SC, Eggener SE, Gaitonde K, Haider MA, Margolis DJ, Marks LS, Pinto P, Sonn GA, Taneja SS. Commentary regarding a recent collaborative consensus statement addressing prostate MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy in patients with a prior negative prostate biopsy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:346-349. [PMID: 27670878 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0920-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman Street, PO Box 670761, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0761, USA.
| | | | - Peter Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Scott E Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Krishnanath Gaitonde
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, USA
| | - Daniel J Margolis
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
| | - Leonard S Marks
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute & NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urologic Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rocco B, Boeri L. Prostate cancer gene 3 assay in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasonography fusion target biopsy era: a future to believe in. BJU Int 2016; 118:672-673. [PMID: 27753467 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, University of Milan Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Urology, Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, University of Milan Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Nicholson A, Mahon J, Boland A, Beale S, Dwan K, Fleeman N, Hockenhull J, Dundar Y. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PROGENSA® prostate cancer antigen 3 assay and the Prostate Health Index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:i-xxxi, 1-191. [PMID: 26507078 DOI: 10.3310/hta19870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no single definitive test to identify prostate cancer in men. Biopsies are commonly used to obtain samples of prostate tissue for histopathological examination. However, this approach frequently misses cases of cancer, meaning that repeat biopsies may be necessary to obtain a diagnosis. The PROGENSA(®) prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) assay (Hologic Gen-Probe, Marlborough, MA, USA) and the Prostate Health Index (phi; Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) are two new tests (a urine test and a blood test, respectively) that are designed to be used to help clinicians decide whether or not to recommend a repeat biopsy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PCA3 assay and the phi in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES Multiple publication databases and trial registers were searched in May 2014 (from 2000 to May 2014), including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, Medion, Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility database, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. REVIEW METHODS The assessment of clinical effectiveness involved three separate systematic reviews, namely reviews of the analytical validity, the clinical validity of these tests and the clinical utility of these tests. The assessment of cost-effectiveness comprised a systematic review of full economic evaluations and the development of a de novo economic model. SETTING The perspective of the evaluation was the NHS in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS Men suspected of having prostate cancer for whom the results of an initial prostate biopsy were negative or equivocal. INTERVENTIONS The use of the PCA3 score or phi in combination with existing tests (including histopathology results, prostate-specific antigen level and digital rectal examination), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical judgement. RESULTS In addition to documents published by the manufacturers, six studies were identified for inclusion in the analytical validity review. The review identified issues concerning the precision of the PCA3 assay measurements. It also highlighted issues relating to the storage requirements and stability of samples intended for analysis using the phi assay. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria for the clinical validity review. These studies reported results for 10 different clinical comparisons. There was insufficient evidence to enable the identification of appropriate test threshold values for use in a clinical setting. In addition, the implications of adding either the PCA3 assay or the phi to clinical assessment were not clear. Furthermore, the addition of the PCA3 assay or the phi to clinical assessment plus magnetic resonance imaging was not found to improve discrimination. No published papers met the inclusion criteria for either the clinical utility review or the cost-effectiveness review. The results from the cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that using either the PCA3 assay or the phi in the NHS was not cost-effective. LIMITATIONS The main limitations of the systematic review of clinical validity are that the review conclusions are over-reliant on findings from one study, the descriptions of clinical assessment vary widely within reviewed studies and many of the reported results for the clinical validity outcomes do not include either standard errors or confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS The clinical benefit of using the PCA3 assay or the phi in combination with existing tests, scans and clinical judgement has not yet been confirmed. The results from the cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that the use of these tests in the NHS would not be cost-effective. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014009595. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Nicholson
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Mahon
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Angela Boland
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sophie Beale
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kerry Dwan
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nigel Fleeman
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Juliet Hockenhull
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Yenal Dundar
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
De Luca S, Passera R, Cattaneo G, Manfredi M, Mele F, Fiori C, Bollito E, Cirillo S, Porpiglia F. High prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) scores are associated with elevated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) grade and biopsy Gleason score, at magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion software-based targeted prostate biopsy after. BJU Int 2016; 118:723-730. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano De Luca
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine; San Giovanni Battista Hospital; University of Torino; Torino Italy
| | - Giovanni Cattaneo
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | - Fabrizio Mele
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | - Enrico Bollito
- Department of Pathology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital; University of Torino; Orbassano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rastinehad AR, Waingankar N, Turkbey B, Yaskiv O, Sonstegard AM, Fakhoury M, Olsson CA, Siegel DN, Choyke PL, Ben-Levi E, Villani R. Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143404. [PMID: 26605548 PMCID: PMC4659614 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiple scoring systems have been proposed for prostate MRI reporting. We sought to review the clinical impact of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) and compare those results to our proposed Simplified Qualitative System (SQS) score with respect to detection of prostate cancers and clinically significant prostate cancers. Methods All patients who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) had their images interpreted using PI-RADS v1 and SQS score. PI-RADS v2 was calculated from prospectively collected data points. Patients with positive mpMRIs were then referred by their urologists for enrollment in an IRB-approved prospective phase III trial of mpMRI-Ultrasound (MR/TRUS) fusion biopsy of suspicious lesions. Standard 12-core biopsy was performed at the same setting. Clinical data were collected prospectively. Results 1060 patients were imaged using mpMRI at our institution during the study period. 341 participants were then referred to the trial. 312 participants underwent MR/TRUS fusion biopsy of 452 lesions and were included in the analysis. 202 participants had biopsy-proven cancer (64.7%) and 206 (45.6%) lesions were positive for cancer. Distribution of cancer detected at each score produced a Gaussian distribution for SQS while PI-RADS demonstrates a negatively skewed curve with 82.1% of cases being scored as a 4 or 5. Patient-level data demonstrated AUC of 0.702 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) for PI-RADS and 0.762 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81) for SQS (p< 0.0001) with respect to the detection of prostate cancer. The analysis for clinically significant prostate cancer at a per lesion level resulted in an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.76) and 0.829 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.87) for the PI-RADS and SQS score, respectively (p< 0.0001). Conclusions mpMRI is a useful tool in the workup of patients at risk for prostate cancer, and serves as a platform to guide further evaluation with MR/TRUS fusion biopsy. SQS score provided a more normal distribution of scores and yielded a higher AUC than PI-RADS v2. However until our findings are validated, we recommend reporting of detailed sequence-specific findings. This will allow for prospectively collected data to be utilized in determining the impact of ongoing changes to these scoring systems as our understanding of mpMRI interpretation evolves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Nikhil Waingankar
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Oksana Yaskiv
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| | - Anna M. Sonstegard
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| | - Mathew Fakhoury
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| | - Carl A. Olsson
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - David N. Siegel
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Eran Ben-Levi
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| | - Robert Villani
- Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer. World J Urol 2015; 34:509-15. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
24
|
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer. Invest Radiol 2015; 50:490-7. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
25
|
Blute ML, Abel EJ, Downs TM, Kelcz F, Jarrard DF. Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches. Nat Rev Urol 2015; 12:435-44. [PMID: 26171803 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
No guidelines currently exist that address the need for rebiopsy in patients with a negative diagnosis of prostate cancer on initial biopsy sample analysis. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer in these patients is often complicated by continued elevation of serum PSA levels that are suggestive of prostate cancer, resulting in a distinct management challenge. Following negative initial findings of biopsy sample analysis, total serum PSA levels and serum PSA kinetics are ineffective indicators of a need for a repeat biopsy; therefore, patients suspected of having prostate cancer might undergo several unnecessary biopsy procedures. Several alternative strategies exist for identifying men who might be at risk of prostate cancer despite negative findings of biopsy sample analysis. Use of other serum PSA-related measurements enables more sensitive and specific diagnosis and can be combined with knowledge of clinicopathological features to improve outcomes. Other options include the FDA-approved Progensa(®) test and prostate imaging using MRI. Newer tissue-based assays that measure methylation changes in normal prostate tissue are currently being developed. A cost-effective strategy is proposed in order to address this challenging clinical scenario, and potential directions of future studies in this area are also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Blute
- Department of Urology,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - E Jason Abel
- Department of Urology,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Tracy M Downs
- Department of Urology,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Frederick Kelcz
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - David F Jarrard
- Department of Urology,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee DJ, Ahmed HU, Moore CM, Emberton M, Ehdaie B. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer: current applications and strategies. Curr Urol Rep 2014; 15:390. [PMID: 24430171 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0390-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly used worldwide in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. With advances in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) technology, such as the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences, observational studies have evaluated the utility for mpMRI in the continuum of prostate cancer management, from improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, to planning radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy and the early detection of local recurrence. Furthermore, the potential for advanced imaging to reduce the burden of routine serial prostate needle biopsies for men on active surveillance is a promising area of research. MRI technology continues to evolve, and the potential applications in the management of prostate cancer care will require well-designed multi-institutional prospective clinical trials and rigorous efforts to standardize reporting and improve dissemination of expertise across institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Lee
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Comparison in the follow-up of two patients with persistent elevated PSA and negative prostate biopsy. Urologia 2014. [DOI: 10.5301/urologia.500055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
28
|
[Comparison in the follow-up of two patients with persistent elevated PSA and negative prostate biopsy]. Urologia 2014; 81:60-3. [PMID: 24585440 DOI: 10.5301/urologia.5000055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare two clinical cases on the follow-up of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia at risck of progression, negative prostate biopsy and persistent elevated PSA levels. MATERIALS After a first negative prostate biopsy for elevated PSA levels, Case A received dutasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, whereas Case B continued his therapy without dutasteride. In both cases, other diagnostic procedures or other biopsies were decided on the basis of PSA level modifications. RESULTS Case A showed a stabilization of PSA levels with a new nadir; the patient did not undergo new biopsies or other diagnostic procedures till the presence (24 months of follow-up) of a PSA elevation despite dutasteride therapy. A new biopsy, then, showed a prostate adenocarcinoma. Case B showed persistent and progressive PSA elevation; the patient underwent other diagnostic procedures and 2 new negative biopsies. Only after 26 months of follow-up a further biopsy showed a prostate adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors can reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Collapse
|