Is the Striated Urethral Sphincter at Risk by Standard Suture Ligation of the Dorsal Vascular Complex in Radical Prostatectomy? An Anatomic Study

[Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: risk factors and utilisation of care]

Stress urinary incontinence is a relevant risk of radical prostatectomy (RP), which significantly affects patients' quality of life. The risk of developing stress urinary incontinence depends on pre-, intra- and postoperative factors. In particular, intraoperative factors regarding different surgical techniques are often focused on in order to improve continence rates. If stress urinary incontinence develops after RPE, patients affected should be treated adequately. In this respect, there are indications of healthcare insufficiencies in Germany. On the one hand, these include deficits in the use of incontinence materials. On the other hand, surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after RPE is insufficient.

Modified anterior approach preserving Retzius space versus standard anterior approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis

Objective

To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the modified anterior approach (MA) with Retzius space preservation robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the standard anterior approach (SA) RARP.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 116 patients with RARP completed by the same surgeon between September 2019 and March 2022. They were divided into SA-RARP group (77 cases) and MA-RARP group (39 cases). Propensity score matching was performed using eight preoperative variables, including age, BMI, preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score, prostate volume, D'Amico risk classification, SHIM, and clinical T stage. Functional outcome was assessed by urine pad count and SHIM after surgery, and oncological outcome was assessed by statistics of postoperative pathological findings as well as follow-up postoperative PSA. The median follow-up was 13 months and 17 months for MA-RARP and SA-RARP groups respectively.

Results

Propensity score matching was performed 1:1, and baseline data were comparable between the two groups after matching. Comparison of postoperative data: MA-RARP group had less mean EBL than SA-RARP group (200 vs 150 ml, p = 0.033). PSM did not differ between groups (p = 1). In terms of urinary control recovery, the MA-RARP group showed significant advantages in urinary control recovery at 24 h, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after catheter removal, respectively (48.6% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001; 80% vs 22.9%, p < 0.001; 94.3% vs 51.4%, p < 0.001; 100% vs 74.3%, p = 0.002). This advantage gradually disappeared 6 months or more after surgery. The median time to recovery of sexual function was shorter in the MA-RARP group (165 vs 255 d, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

MA-RARP is safe and reliable, and can achieve better early urinary control function and sexual function recovery while achieving the primary tumor control goal.

Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Whether early ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC) might improve recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has never been investigated in a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether early DVC ligation might affect UC recovery after RARP.

INTERVENTION

DVC ligation (early vs standard).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 312 patients with prostate cancer underwent primary RARP at a tertiary care institution.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was UC recovery at 1 and 4 mo after RARP. UC was defined as 0 pads/1 safety pad per day. All patients completed the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-Short Form questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were early (≤4 mo) erectile function recovery, the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, 30-d Clavien-Dindo complications, and biochemical recurrence rates. Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The association between treatment arm and UC recovery was also tested using multivariable regression models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After surgery, 23 patients withdrew their consent and 29 were lost to follow-up, leaving 261 patients available for per-protocol analyses. Of these, 32 patients (24%) in the experimental group and 37 (29%) in the control group used no pad/one safety pad at 1 mo after RARP, whereas 96 (72%) in the control group versus 83 (65%) in the control group were continent at 4-mo follow-up (both p = 0.3). Median ICIQ and IPSS scores did not differ between the groups at both time points. The results were confirmed on multivariable regression analyses. PSMs were observed for 32 patients (25%) in the experimental group versus 30 (22%) in the control group (p = 0.6). The incidence of postoperative complications (17% experimental vs 13% control) and the 1-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized clinical trial, we did not find evidence that early ligation of the DVC during RARP was associated with better UC recovery after surgery in comparison to the standard technique. Given its safety in terms of surgical margins and complications, this technique may be considered as an option for surgical dissection according to the physician's preference.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our trial showed that for patients undergoing robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate, the timing of a specific step to control bleeding from a network of veins draining the prostate did not affect recovery of urinary continence after surgery. The results indicate that earlier control of these veins may be considered as an option according to the surgeon's preference.

Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Context

Meticulous knowledge about the anatomy of the prostate and surrounding tissue represents a crucial and mandatory requirement during radical prostatectomy for reliable oncological and excellent replicable, functional outcomes. Since its introduction two decades ago, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has evolved to become the predominant surgical approach in many industrialized countries.

Objective

To provide and highlight currently available literature regarding prostate anatomy and to help in improving oncological and functional outcomes in RALP.

Methods/Evidence Acquiring

PubMed database was searched using the following keywords: "robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy," "anatomy," "neurovascular bundle," "nerve," "periprostatic fascia," "pelvis," "sphincter," "urethra," "urinary incontinence," and "erectile dysfunction." Relevant articles and book chapters were critically reviewed and if eligible, they were included in this review.

Results

New evidence in regards to prostatic anatomy and surgical approaches in RALP has been reported in recent years. Besides detailed anatomical studies investigating the meticulous structure of the fascial structures surrounding the prostate and neurovascular bundle preservation, debate about the optimal RALP approach is still ongoing, inspired by recent publications presenting promising functional outcomes following modifications in surgical approaches.

Conclusions

This review provides a detailed overview of the current knowledge of prostate anatomy, its surrounding tissue, and its influence on key surgical step development for RALP.

New Evolution of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Center Experience with PERUSIA Technique

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard surgical treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer in patients with a life expectancy of at least 10 years. In a recent prospective study, we described the PERUSIA (Posterior, Extraperitoneal, Robotic, Under Santorini, Intrafascial, Anterograde) technique, which is an extraperitoneal full nerve sparing robotic RP, showing its feasibility and safety. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the peri-operative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of the PERUSIA technique. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 454 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) performed using the PERUSIA technique from January 2012 to October 2019. We evaluated perioperative outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, catheterization time, complication rate, length of stay), oncological (positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence), and functional outcomes in terms of urinary continence and sexual potency. The overall complication rate was 16%, positive surgical margins were 8.1%, and biochemical recurrence occurred in 8.6% at median follow-up of 47 months. Urinary continence was achieved in 69% of cases the day after the removal of the catheter, in 92% at 3 months, and in 97% at 12 months after surgery. The average rate of sexual potency was 72% and 82% respectively 3 and 12 months after surgery. Our findings show that the PERUSIA technique is a safe extraperitoneal approach to perform a full nerve sparing technique providing exciting functional outcomes.

Delayed versus standard ligature of the dorsal venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate current views on comparing delayed ligature of the dorsal venous complex (D-DVC) with standard ligature of the dorsal venous complex (S-DVC) for safety, urinary control and oncological outcomes during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive searching of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane Library was made and then we performed a meta-analysis, including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies, to evaluate the two different techniques.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and six retrospective studies containing 1822 cases (222 cases from RCTs and 1600 cases from retrospective studies) were identified. Although D-DVC was related to more blood loss (WMD: 7.30 mL; 95% CI, 2.43 to 12.16; p = 0.003), the blood transfusion rate between the two groups showed no significant difference (OR = 1.93; 95% CI, 0.55 to 6.73; p = 0.31), and patients in the D-DVC group could benefit from a shorter operative time (WMD: -30.83 min; 95% CI, -53.32 to -8.35; p = 0.007). Positive apical margin events were significantly less in the D-DVC group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.71; p = 0.002). As for urinary control, there were no differences in continence rates after 3 months (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.73; p = 0.06) and 12 months (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57; p = 0.99) of follow-up. However, there was a significantly higher continence rate after 6 months of follow-up in the D-DVC group (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.11; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard and delayed approaches to DVC are equally safe and result in similar urinary control. The delayed approach could decrease the positive apical margin rate. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to investigate and compare the prognosis and long-term functional outcomes between the two approaches.

Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique

INTRODUCTION

Primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and the safety of PERUSIA (posterior, extraperitoneal, robotic, under santorini, intrafascial, anterograde) radical prostatectomy (RP). Secondary aim was to evaluate oncologic and functional results. The main intent of PERUSIA is to reduce injury of the Neuro-Vascular Bundles (NVB) and to preserve periurethral anterior structures. This is the first reported prospective cohort study about our technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected prospective data of a cohort of 210 patients who had undergone PERUSIA RP between January 2013 and May 2015. Key points of this technique included the following: posterior approach to intrafascial plane, which was developed from the median to lateral side, anterograde preservation of the Veil of Aphrodite, and development of an anterior avascular plane to preserve the santorini plexus. We included only sexually potent patients with low-risk disease. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes were collected. Postoperative full continence was defined as no pad use. Patients were defined potent when International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score was >17. Median follow-up was 22 months.

RESULTS

Median operative time and median estimated blood loss were 120 minutes and 150 mL, respectively. 25 patients (11.9%) experienced a total of 36 complications overall with an overall complication rate of 17.1%. We reported 3 (8.3%) grade IIIb complications and no major ones. Overall positive surgical margin rate was 20% with biochemical recurrence occurring in 3.8% of patients at a median follow-up of 22 months. Immediate urinary continence rate (1 day after catheter removal) was 66.6%. At 3 and 12 months, the continence rate was 90.4% and 96.1%, respectively, while sexual potency rate was 70.4% and 80.9%.

CONCLUSION

PERUSIA RP has proved to be safe and effective for low-risk prostate cancer with exciting functional outcomes in terms of early recovery of urinary continence and sexual potency.

A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update

CONTEXT

In 2010, we published a review summarising the available literature on surgical anatomy of the prostate and adjacent structures involved in cancer control and the functional outcome of prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update based on new literature to help the surgeon improve oncologic and surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched the PubMed database using the keywords radical prostatectomy, anatomy, neurovascular bundle, nerve, fascia, pelvis, sphincter, urethra, urinary continence, and erectile function. Relevant articles and textbook chapters published since the last review were critically reviewed, analysed, and summarised. Moreover, we integrated aspects that were not addressed in the last review into this update.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We found new evidence for several topics. Up to 40% of the cross-sectional surface area of the urethral sphincter tissue is laterally overlapped by the dorsal vascular complex and might be injured during en bloc ligation. Denonvilliers fascia is fused with the base of the prostate in a horizontal fashion dorsally/caudally of the seminal vesicles, requiring sharp detachment when preserved. During extended pelvic lymph node dissection, the erectile nerves are at risk in the presacral and internal iliac area. Dissection planes for nerve sparing can be graded according to the amount of tissue left on the prostate as a safety margin against positive surgical margins. Vascular structures can serve as landmarks. The urethral sphincter and its length after RP are influenced by the shape of the apex. Taking this shape into account allows preservation of additional sphincter length with improved postoperative continence.

CONCLUSIONS

This update provides additional, detailed information about the surgical anatomy of the prostate and adjacent tissues involved in RP. This anatomy remains complex and widely variable. These details facilitate surgical orientation and dissection during RP and ideally should translate into improved outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Based on recent anatomic findings regarding the prostate and its surrounding tissue, the urologist can individualise the dissection during RP according to cancer and patient characteristics to improve oncologic and functional results at the same time.