1
|
Zeng GH, Zhong W, Mazzon G, Zhu W, Lahme S, Khadgi S, Desai J, Agrawal M, Schulsinger D, Gupta M, Montanari E, Martinez JML, Almousawi S, Malonzo VEF, Sriprasad S, Durutovic O, Arumuham V, Ferretti S, Kamal W, Xu KW, Cheng F, Gao XF, Cheng JW, Somani B, Duvdevani M, Git KA, Seitz C, Bernardo N, Ibrahim TAA, Aquino A, Yasui T, Fiori C, Knoll T, Papatsoris A, Gadzhiev N, Zhanbyrbekuly U, Angerri O, Ramos HL, Saltirov I, Moussa M, Giusti G, Vicentini F, Suarez EB, Pearle M, Preminger GM, Wu QH, Durutovic O, Ghani K, Maroccolo M, Brehmer M, Osther PJ, Zawadzki M, Tursunkulov A, Kytaibekovich MN, Abuvohidov AA, Lara CAR, Noori Z, Zanetti SP, Shrestha S, de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Ye ZQ, Sarica K, Choong S. International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Mil Med Res 2024; 11:70. [PMID: 39465407 PMCID: PMC11514913 DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past three decades, there has been increasing interest in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) techniques featuring smaller tracts as they offer potential solutions to mitigate complications associated with standard PCNL (sPCNL). However, despite this growing acceptance and recognition of its benefits, unresolved controversies and acknowledged limitations continue to impede widespread adoption due to a lack of consensus on optimal perioperative management strategies and procedural tips and tricks. In response to these challenges, an international panel comprising experts from the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) took on the task of compiling an expert consensus document on mPCNL procedures aimed at providing urologists with a comprehensive clinical framework for practice. This endeavor involved conducting a systematic literature review to identify research gaps (RGs), which formed the foundation for developing a structured questionnaire survey. Subsequently, a two-round modified Delphi survey was implemented, culminating in a group meeting to generate final evidence-based comments. All 64 experts completed the second-round survey, resulting in a response rate of 100.0%. Fifty-eight key questions were raised focusing on mPCNLs within 4 main domains, including general information (13 questions), preoperative work-up (13 questions), procedural tips and tricks (19 questions), and postoperative evaluation and follow-up (13 questions). Additionally, 9 questions evaluated the experts' experience with PCNLs. Consensus was reached on 30 questions after the second-round survey, while professional statements for the remaining 28 key questions were provided after discussion in an online panel meeting. mPCNL, characterized by a tract smaller than 18 Fr and an innovative lithotripsy technique, has firmly established itself as a viable and effective approach for managing upper urinary tract stones in both adults and pediatrics. It offers several advantages over sPCNL including reduced bleeding, fewer requirements for nephrostomy tubes, decreased pain, and shorter hospital stays. The series of detailed techniques presented here serve as a comprehensive guide for urologists, aiming to improve their procedural understanding and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Hua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China.
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Wei Zhu
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China
| | - Sven Lahme
- Department of Urology, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, 75179, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | - Janak Desai
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, 387001, India
| | - Madhu Agrawal
- Department of Urology, Centre for Minimally-Invasive Endourology, Global Rainbow Healthcare, Agra, 282007, India
| | - David Schulsinger
- Department of Urology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Shabir Almousawi
- Department of Urology, Sabah Al Ahmad Urology Centre, 20005, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Vincent Emanuel F Malonzo
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Veterans Memorial Medical Center, 1110, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | | | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, University of Belgrade, 11120, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vimoshan Arumuham
- Department of Urology, Stone and Endourology Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital, University of Parma, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Wissam Kamal
- Department of Urology, King Fahd Hospital, 23325, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ke-Wei Xu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Fan Cheng
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Gao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Ji-Wen Cheng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530022, China
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Mordechai Duvdevani
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kah Ann Git
- Department of Urology, Pantai Hospital, 11900, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, 1120, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Albert Aquino
- Department of Urology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, 1003, Manila, Philippines
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephrourology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 464-0083, Japan
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Thomas Knoll
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Boeblingen, University of Tuebingen, 71032, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleion General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126, Athens, Greece
| | - Nariman Gadzhiev
- Department of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 194100
| | - Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Astana Medical University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Oriol Angerri
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hugo Lopez Ramos
- Department of Urology, San Ignacio University Hospital, 110231, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Mohamad Moussa
- Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center and Lebanese University, Beirut, 10001, Lebanon
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, 20127, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Vicentini
- Department of Urology, Endourology and Stone Disease Section, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 05508, Brazil
| | - Edgar Beltran Suarez
- Department of Urology, Specialty Hospital La Raza, National Medical Center of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, 97217, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Glenn M Preminger
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Qing-Hui Wu
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 112106, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Khurshid Ghani
- Department of Urology, Division of Endourology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Marcus Maroccolo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Base of the Federal District, Brasília, 70330-150, Brazil
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Stockholm Sweden and Aarhus University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Denmark
| | - Palle J Osther
- Department of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, 246000, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marek Zawadzki
- Department of Urology, St. Anna Hospital, 05500, Piaseczno, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | - Zamari Noori
- Department of Urology, Aria Apollo Hospital, Ameriat Square, 3001, Herat, Afghanistan
| | - Stefano Paolo Zanetti
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, 28-20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Sunil Shrestha
- Department of Surgery, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Jorpati, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, 34815, Turkey
| | - John Denstedt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Zhang-Qun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Biruni University, Istanbul, 34020, Turkey
| | - Simon Choong
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital of London, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yazici CM, Gönen KA, Ozman O, Cakir H, Basatac C, Akgul HM, Cinar O, Siddikoglu D, Dayısoylu HS, Sancak EB, Baseskioglu B, Onal B, Akpinar H. Determining the Stone Free Rate of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Which Radiological Technique? RIRSearch Study Group. Urology 2024; 187:17-24. [PMID: 38387515 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography (USG) and kidney ureter bladder radiography (KUB) for the determination of stone-free status of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) according to different stone-free status definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patients who underwent RIRS between September 2021 and September 2022 were prospectively included in the study. All patients underwent a KUB radiography, urinary system USG and noncontrast abdominal tomography at the postoperative first month of the surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive factor, and positive predictive factor of USG and KUB on evaluating the stone-free rate were analyzed according to different stone-free status definitions. RESULTS A total of 178 patients were included in the study. The stone-free rates according to stone-free definitions as; residual stone <4 mm, <2 mm and no residual stone were 79.2%, 64.0%, and 56.7%, respectively. According to its definition as a residual stone <4 mm, the sensitivity and specificity of USG were 64.9% and 84.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of USG was 57.1% and 52.5% as the definitions were residual stone <2 mm and no residual stone, respectively. Addition of KUB to USG slightly increased the sensitivity but did not change the specificity. CONCLUSION USG had high specificity but low sensitivity for evaluating stone-free status after RIRS and addition of KUB did not increase the diagnostic efficacy. Although USG may be used in daily practice, it may overestimate the stone-free status and noncontrast abdominal tomography must be used during the clinical trials to document the exact stone-free rates of RIRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cenk Murat Yazici
- Tekirdag Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Tekirdag, Turkey.
| | - Korcan Aysun Gönen
- Tekirdag Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Oktay Ozman
- Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital Clinic of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hakan Cakir
- Acibadem Fulya Hospital Clinic of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cem Basatac
- Group Florence Nightingale Hospitals Clinic of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Haci Murat Akgul
- Tekirdag Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Onder Cinar
- Medicana International Samsun Hospital Clinic of Urology, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Duygu Siddikoglu
- Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Canakkale, Turkey
| | - Hulusi Sıtkı Dayısoylu
- Tekirdag Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Eyup Burak Sancak
- Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Canakkale, Turkey
| | | | - Bulent Onal
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Haluk Akpinar
- Group Florence Nightingale Hospitals Clinic of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abouelgreed TA, Elhelaly MA, El-Agamy ESI, Ahmed R, Haggag YM, Abdelwadood M, Abdelkader SF, Ali SS, Aboelsoud NM, Alassal MF, Bashir GA, Gharib T. Effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on the surgical outcomes of patients with 1-2 cm renal stones managed by retrograde intrarenal surgery using a ureteral access sheath. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2023; 95:12102. [PMID: 38193223 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2023.12102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the surgical results of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a ureteral access sheath (UAS) for management of renal stones sized 1-2 cm compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study included 83 patients (aged ≥ 20 years) who underwent RIRS from July 2021 to January 2023. All patients had renal calculi (stone size: 1-2 cm) located within the pelvicalyceal system. 43 and 40 patients were allocated to the non-prestent (group A) and prestent (group B), respectively. Patient baseline characteristics, renal stone details, operative data, stone-free rate (SFR) at 4 weeks and 6 months, and perioperative complications were compared between groups. RESULTS The baseline characteristics of all patients were comparable across the groups. Four weeks after surgery, the overall stone-free rate (SFR) stood at 62.65%. In the non-prestent and prestent groups, the SFRs were 58.12% and 67.5%, respectively (p = 0.89). By the sixth month post-surgery, the overall SFR rose to 80.72%. In the non-prestent and prestent groups, the SFRs were 76.74% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.081). No notable differences emerged in other variables, including perioperative complications, between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The SFR showed no significant difference between the prestenting and non-prestenting groups at the 4-week and 6-month postoperative marks. Additionally, there were no substantial differences in complications during surgery and recovery between the groups. Notably, the SFR increased from 4 weeks to 6 months without any additional procedures in either group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer A Abouelgreed
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt; Gulf medical university, Ajman.
| | | | | | - Rasha Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo.
| | - Yasser M Haggag
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Asyut.
| | - M Abdelwadood
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo.
| | - Salma F Abdelkader
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University, Cairo.
| | - Sameh S Ali
- Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa general Hospital, UAQ.
| | - Naglaa M Aboelsoud
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo.
| | - Mosab F Alassal
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Saudi German Hospital, Ajman.
| | - Gehad A Bashir
- Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi.
| | - Tarek Gharib
- Department of Urology, Faculty of medicine, Benha University, Benha.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta RT, Kalisz K, Khatri G, Caserta MP, Catanzano TM, Chang SD, De Leon AD, Gore JL, Nicola R, Prabhakar AM, Savage SJ, Shah KP, Surabhi VR, Taffel MT, Valente JH, Yoo DC, Nikolaidis P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset Flank Pain-Suspicion of Stone Disease (Urolithiasis). J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S315-S328. [PMID: 38040458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Noncontrast CT (NCCT) is the imaging study of choice for initial evaluation of patients with acute onset of flank pain and suspicion of stone disease without known prior stone disease. NCCT can reliably characterize the location and size of an offending ureteral calculus, identify complications, and diagnose alternative etiologies of abdominal pain. Although less sensitive in the detection of stones, ultrasound may have a role in evaluating for signs of obstruction. Radiography potentially has a role, although has been shown to be less sensitive than NCCT. For patients with known disease and recurrent symptoms of urolithiasis, NCCT remains the test of choice for evaluation. In pregnancy, given radiation concerns, ultrasound is recommended as the initial modality of choice with potential role for noncontrast MRI. In scenarios where stone disease suspected and initial NCCT is inconclusive, contrast-enhanced imaging, either with MRI or CT/CT urogram may be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Kevin Kalisz
- Research Author, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Panel Chair, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | - Silvia D Chang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Refky Nicola
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Anand M Prabhakar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association
| | - Kevin P Shah
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | | | - Myles T Taffel
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan H Valente
- Rhode Island Hospital and Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assantachai K, Srinualnad S, Leewansangtong S, Taweemonkongsap T, Liangkobkit K, Chotikawanich E. Surgical outcomes of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery using a ureteral access sheath to manage kidney stones sized 1-2 cm compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative ureteral stenting. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15801. [PMID: 37305517 PMCID: PMC10256857 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a ureteral access sheath (UAS) to manage kidney stones sized 1-2 cm compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative ureteral prestenting. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included 166 patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent RIRS at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during February 2015-February 2020. All patients had renal calculi (stone size: 1-2 cm) located within the pelvicalyceal system. 80 and 86 patients were allocated to the prestent and non-prestent groups, respectively. Patient baseline characteristics, renal stone details, operative equipment, stone-free rate (SFR) at 2 weeks and 6 months, and perioperative complications were compared between groups. Results All patient baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At 2 weeks after surgery, the overall SFR was 65.1%, and the SFRs in the prestent and non-prestent groups were 73.4% and 59.5%, respectively (p = 0.09). At 6 months after surgery, the overall SFR was 80.1%, and the SFRs in the prestent and non-prestent groups were 90.7% and 79.3%, respectively (p = 0.08). The incidence of perioperative complications was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions There was no significant difference in the SFR between the presenting and non-prestenting groups at both the 2-week and 6-month postoperative time points. There was also no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications between groups. The SFR was higher at 6 months than at 2 weeks in both groups with no additional procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ekkarin Chotikawanich
- Corresponding author. Ekkarin Chotikawanich, MD. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koterazawa S, Somiya S, Ito K, Haitani T, Makino Y, Arakaki R, Kawase N, Higashi Y, Yamada H, Kanno T. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2023; 50:197-203. [PMID: 36930378 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-023-01299-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrasonography and computed tomography urography are two commonly used modalities to image the upper tracts for the evaluation of hematuria. This study evaluated the efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared to computed tomography urography as a standard reference. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and/or ureter who were diagnosed using computed tomography urography and underwent surgical treatment. We calculated the sensitivity of ultrasonography in upper tract urothelial carcinoma diagnosis, further classified the degree of hydronephrosis on ultrasonography, and analyzed the relationship between the sensitivity and the degree of hydronephrosis and tumor location. Additionally, the usefulness of the combination of the screening ultrasonography findings, the presence of gross hematuria, and/or urine cytology was analyzed. RESULTS This study included 136 patients with upper urothelial carcinoma. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis had 45.6% sensitivity, and ultrasonography findings, including the detection of hydronephrosis, were present in 72.8%. The presence of hydronephrosis and tumor location were associated with detection by ultrasonography. The tumor was identified in a total of 134 (98.5%) patients by combining tumor detection and hydronephrosis using ultrasonography with gross hematuria and positive urine cytology as screening. CONCLUSION Ultrasonography showed acceptable sensitivity for upper tract urothelial carcinoma diagnosis. Considering the hydronephrosis findings, ultrasonography is a useful screening tool for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Additionally, excessive computed tomography examinations can be reduced by adding gross hematuria and positive urine cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeki Koterazawa
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Yuki Makino
- Department of Urology, Kosekai Takeda Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Norio Kawase
- Department of Urology, Kosekai Takeda Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Moriminami-Cho, Ishida Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koterazawa S, Kanno T, Takahashi T, Somiya S, Ito K, Haitani T, Arakaki R, Kawase N, Higashi Y, Yamada H. Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in octogenarians. Int J Urol 2023; 30:161-167. [PMID: 36305661 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy (URS) for urolithiasis in octogenarians, and identify preoperative risk factors for the incidence of postoperative complications. METHODS The patients who underwent URS for urolithiasis were divided into octogenarians and younger patients (age: <80 years), and the groups were compared regarding their clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and stone-free rate. The predictors of postoperative complications were evaluated using logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 1207 patients were included, 166 in the octogenarian patient group and 1041 in the younger patient group. The proportion of female patients (p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p < 0.001), rate of preoperative pyelonephritis (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003) were higher in the octogenarian group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding stone size, location, and intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications, which reached a significant difference, were observed in 34 (20.5%) octogenarians and 117 (11.2%) younger patients (p = 0.002). However, age itself was not significantly associated with postoperative fever, the most frequent postoperative complication, in multivariate analysis. Female sex, ASA score of ≥3, history of diabetes mellitus, and prolonged operative time (≥120 min) were the significant predictors of fever. The stone-free rate in the octogenarian group was superior to that in the younger patient group (80.1% vs. 70.6%, respectively; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that URS for urolithiasis can be safely and effectively applied to octogenarians in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Norio Kawase
- Department of Urology, Koseikai Takeda Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Can plain film radiography improve the emergency department detection of clinically important urinary stones? Am J Emerg Med 2021; 50:449-454. [PMID: 34492590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Physicians frequently use ultrasound to assess hydronephrosis in patients with suspected renal colic, but ultrasound has limited diagnostic sensitivity and rarely clarifies stone size or location. Consequently, up to 80% of emergency department (ED) renal colic patients undergo confirmatory CT imaging. Our goal was to estimate x-ray sensitivity for urinary stones and determine whether x-ray substantially improves stone detection (sensitivity) compared to hydronephrosis assessment alone. METHODS We reviewed imaging reports from all renal colic patients who underwent x-ray and CT at four EDs. For each patient, we documented stone size, location and hydronephrosis severity on CT and whether stones were identified on x-ray. We considered moderate and severe hydronephrosis (MS-Hydro) as significant positive findings, then calculated the sensitivity (detection rate) of MS-Hydro and x-ray for large stones ≥5 mm and for stones likely to require intervention (all ureteral stones >7 mm and proximal or middle stones >5 mm). We then tested a diagnostic algorithm adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment. RESULTS Among 1026 patients with 1527 stones, MS-Hydro sensitivity was 39% for large stones and 60% for interventional stones. X-ray sensitivity was 46% for large stones and 52% for interventional stones. Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment increased sensitivity in all stone categories, specifically from 39% to 68% for large stones (gain = 29%; 95%CI, 23% to 35%) and from 60% to 82% for interventional stones (gain = 22%; 95%CI, 13% to 30%). Because CT and ultrasound show strong agreement for MS-Hydro identification, physicians who depend on ultrasound-based hydronephrosis assessment could achieve similar gains by adding x-ray. CONCLUSIONS Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment substantially improves diagnostic sensitivity, enabling the detection of nearly 70% of large stones and over 80% of interventional stones. This level of sensitivity may be sufficient to reassure physicians about a renal colic diagnosis without CT imaging for many patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ito K, Takahashi T, Somiya S, Kanno T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. Predictors of Repeat Surgery and Stone-related Events After Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones. Urology 2021; 154:96-102. [PMID: 33667526 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the risk of repeat surgery and stone-related events after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for renal stones, and to identify their predictive factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients (n = 664) who underwent fURS for renal stones with or without concomitant ureteral stones between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary outcomes were time to ipsilateral stone-related surgical intervention and any stone-related event (including ipsilateral renal colic, symptomatic ureteral calculi, obstructive urinary tract infection, and surgical intervention). RESULTS During median follow-up of 31.1 months, 103 (15.5%) and 135 (20.3%) patients experienced surgical intervention and any stone-related event, respectively. The estimated 2-year intervention-free survival and stone-event-free survival was 86.9% and 81.6%, respectively. On Cox multivariate analysis, younger age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96), history of stone surgery (HR 2.17), larger preoperative stone burden (HR 1.03), and larger residual fragment (HR 1.09) showed an association with future intervention. Use of the four identified risk factors (age ≤60, history of stone surgery, stone burden ≥20 mm, and residual fragment ≥4 mm) allowed stratification of patients based on the risk of future intervention (low [score: 0-1], intermediate [2], and high [3-4] risk). The estimated 2-year intervention-free survival rates in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 96.2%, 86.4%, and 71.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing fURS are at risk of future ipsilateral surgical intervention and stone-related events. Our simple predictive tool can facilitate treatment decision-making by identifying patients who are at high risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Toshifumi Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McLeavy CM, Chunara MH, Gravell RJ, Rauf A, Cushnie A, Staley Talbot C, Hawkins RM. The future of CT: deep learning reconstruction. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:407-415. [PMID: 33637310 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
There have been substantial advances in computed tomography (CT) technology since its introduction in the 1970s. More recently, these advances have focused on image reconstruction. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) is the latest complex reconstruction algorithm to be introduced, which harnesses advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and affordable supercomputer technology to achieve the previously elusive triad of high image quality, low radiation dose, and fast reconstruction speeds. The dose reductions achieved with DLR are redefining ultra-low-dose into the realm of plain radiographs whilst maintaining image quality. This review aims to demonstrate the advantages of DLR over other reconstruction methods in terms of dose reduction and image quality in addition to being able to tailor protocols to specific clinical situations. DLR is the future of CT technology and should be considered when procuring new scanners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M McLeavy
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - M H Chunara
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - R J Gravell
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - A Rauf
- Department of Urology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - A Cushnie
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - C Staley Talbot
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK
| | - R M Hawkins
- Department of Radiology, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, CW1 4QJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang B, Suhail N, Marais J, Brewin J. Do low dose CT-KUBs really expose patients to more radiation than plain abdominal radiographs? Urologia 2021; 88:362-368. [PMID: 33583356 DOI: 10.1177/0391560321994443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urolithiasis patients often require frequent urinary tract imaging, leading to high radiation exposure. CT Kidney-Ureter-Bladder (CT-KUB) is the gold standard in urolithiasis detection, however it is thought to harbour significant radiation load. Urologists have therefore utilised abdominal radiographs (XR-KUB) as an alternative, though with markedly lower sensitivity and specificity. We present the first contemporary UK study comparing the effective doses of XR-KUBs with low dose CT-KUBs. METHOD Fifty-three patients were retrospectively identified in a single centre who underwent both a XR-KUB and a CT-KUB in 2018. Effective-Dose was measured by converting the recorded 'Dose Area/Length Product' via the International Commission on Radiological Protection formula. RESULTS The average effective dose of XR-KUBs and low dose CT-KUBs were 5.10 mSv and 5.31 mSv respectively. Thirty-four percent (18/53) of patients had a XR-KUBs with a higher effective dose than their low dose CT-KUB. Patients with higher Weight, BMI and AP diameter had higher effective doses for both their XR and low dose CT-KUBs. All patients in our study weighing over 92 kg or with a BMI greater than 32 had a XR-KUBs with a higher effective dose than their low dose CT-KUB. CONCLUSION This data supports moving away from XR-KUBs for the investigation of urolithiasis, particularly in patients with a high BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bob Yang
- Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ito K, Takahashi T, Kanno T, Okada T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm. Investig Clin Urol 2020; 62:72-78. [PMID: 33314807 PMCID: PMC7801166 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the treatment success rate and safety of reduced (30 shocks/min, 1,200 shocks/session) versus standard (60 shocks/min, 2,400 shocks/session) extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the management of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 404 patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for 5-20-mm renal stones between April 2011 and March 2019. Patients selected the reduced or standard protocol (group R and S) after explaining the potential benefits and disadvantages. The primary outcome was treatment success within 12 weeks, which was defined as no residual fragment or fragments <4 mm on ultrasonography and plain radiograph. RESULTS In total, 94 and 310 patients underwent shockwave lithotripsy with a reduced and standard protocol, respectively. The background characteristics of the participants did not significantly differ. The treatment success within 12 weeks was achieved in 78 (83.0%) patients in group R and 259 (83.5%) in group S (p=0.88). The median number of the session was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4) in both groups (p=0.53). The total complication rates were 5.4% in group R and 6.1% in group S. Three (1.0%) patients in group S experienced perirenal hematoma, which was conservatively treated. The reduced protocol was not associated with treatment success in the multivariate analysis adjusted for potential confounders (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.80; p=0.78). CONCLUSIONS The new treatment amendment with a slower delivery rate successfully reduced the total number of shocks need to fragment renal stones <20 mm without compromising the stone-free rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
| | | | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Okada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abid AF, Hussein NS. Fragmentation and propulsive effect of shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of small renal calculi. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s12301-020-00063-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Small renal calculi are frequently observed in clinical practice, and chemo-lytic therapy has limited effects. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of small renal calculi.
Methods
We studied 60 patients with small renal stones from March 2017 to March 2019. After excluding eight patients with incomplete data, the remaining 52 patients were evaluated. Patients with symptomatic single or multiple stones of 6–8 mm in diameter or asymptomatic on ultrasound and kidney-ureter-bladder radiograph were eligible for inclusion. Small stones were treated by ESWL. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences - version 25 (IBM Corporation).
Results
The mean age of the 52 patients was 34.5 ± 9.5 years. Forty-one (78.8%) patients were symptomatic, while 11 (21.2%) were asymptomatic. Forty-seven (90.4%) had single small renal stones, while four patients had two stones (7.7%) and only one patient had three stones (1.9%). Forty-five stones were successfully treated by ESWL, while 13 stones failed to respond.
Conclusion
ESWL is a useful tool for treating small renal calculi; it works either by fragmenting the stones or by acting as a pushing force. However, further large prospective studies are needed to corroborate the above conclusions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ito K, Takahashi T, Kanno T, Okada T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. Decreased Recurrence of Urolithiasis After Simultaneous Ureteroscopic Surgery for Ureter and Ipsilateral Renal Calculi: Comparison to Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureter Calculi Alone. Urology 2020; 147:74-80. [PMID: 33181120 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare follow-up outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for ureter calculi in the setting of asymptomatic renal calculi <15 mm. METHODS This study included 789 patients who underwent URS (n = 301) or SWL (n = 488) as primary treatment for ureter calculi and who had ipsilateral renal calculi <15 mm between January 2012 and December 2019. For the URS group, all renal calculi were simultaneously treated unless contraindicated. One-to-one matching was performed using the propensity score (PS). RESULTS After PS matching, analysis included 262 matched pairs of URS and SWL patients. The stone-free rate for ureter calculi without auxiliary procedure was 97.3% in the URS group and 93.9% in the SWL group. Any complication rates were 11.0% and 9.2% in the URS and SWL group, respectively; 1.1% of the URS patients experienced complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIb. The estimated 2-year intervention-free survival was 88.1% in the URS group and 84.2% in the SWL group (P = 0.045). The estimated 2-year stone-event-free survival was 80.1% in the URS group and 71.0% in the SWL group (P = 0.009). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the hazard ratios of URS were 0.62 (P = 0.025) for surgical interventions and 0.64 (P = 0.008) for stone-related events after adjusting for baseline variables. CONCLUSION For patients with symptomatic ureter calculi and asymptomatic renal calculi <15 mm, URS with active treatment for renal calculi reduces future ipsilateral surgical intervention and stone-related events compared with SWL for ureter calculi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Toshifumi Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Okada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kanno T, Takahashi T, Ito K, Okada T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. The Natural History of Asymptomatic Renal Stones ≤5 mm: Comparison with ≥5 mm. J Endourol 2020; 34:1188-1194. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Okada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jakubowski J, Moskovitz J, Leonard NJ. Imaging Modalities in Genitourinary Emergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2019; 37:785-809. [PMID: 31563208 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Emergency physicians rely on a multitude of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis of genitourinary emergencies. There are many considerations to be taken into account when deciding which imaging modality should be used first, as oftentimes several diagnostic tools can be used for the same pathologic condition. These factors include radiation exposure, sensitivity, specificity, age of patient, availability of resources, cost, and timeliness of completion. In this review, the strengths and weaknesses of different imaging tools in the evaluation of genitourinary emergencies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Jakubowski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residency Marietta Memorial Hospital, 401 Matthew Street, Marietta, OH 45750, USA; The Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA.
| | - Joshua Moskovitz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Building 6 Room 1B25, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Hofstra School of Health and Human Services, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Nicole J Leonard
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacobi Montefiore Emergency Medicine Residency, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Building 6, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
D'Costa MR, Haley WE, Mara KC, Enders FT, Vrtiska TJ, Pais VM, Jacobsen SJ, McCollough CH, Lieske JC, Rule AD. Symptomatic and Radiographic Manifestations of Kidney Stone Recurrence and Their Prediction by Risk Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1251-1260. [PMID: 31175141 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018121241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meaningful interpretation of changes in radiographic kidney stone burden requires understanding how radiographic recurrence relates to symptomatic recurrence and how established risk factors predict these different manifestations of recurrence. METHODS We recruited first-time symptomatic stone formers from the general community in Minnesota and Florida. Baseline and 5-year follow-up study visits included computed tomography scans, surveys, and medical record review. We noted symptomatic recurrence detected by clinical care (through chart review) or self-report, and radiographic recurrence of any new stone, stone growth, or stone passage (comparing baseline and follow-up scans). To assess the prediction of different manifestations of recurrence, we used the Recurrence of Kidney Stone (ROKS) score, which sums multiple baseline risk factors. RESULTS Among 175 stone formers, 19% had symptomatic recurrence detected by clinical care and 25% detected by self-report; radiographic recurrence manifested as a new stone in 35%, stone growth in 24%, and stone passage in 27%. Among those with a baseline asymptomatic stone (54%), at 5 years, 51% had radiographic evidence of stone passage (accompanied by symptoms in only 52%). Imaging evidence of a new stone or stone passage more strongly associated with symptomatic recurrence detected by clinical care than by self-report. The ROKS score weakly predicted one manifestation-symptomatic recurrence resulting in clinical care (c-statistic, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.73)-but strongly predicted any manifestation of symptomatic or radiographic recurrence (5-year rate, 67%; c-statistic, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Recurrence after the first stone episode is both more common and more predictable when all manifestations of recurrence (symptomatic and radiographic) are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Vernon M Pais
- Department of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kuebker J, Shuman J, Hsi RS, Herrell SD, Miller NL. Radiation From Kidney-Ureter-Bladder Radiographs Is Not Trivial. Urology 2019; 125:46-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|