Contemporary Patterns of Third-line Treatments for Privately Insured Individuals With Overactive Bladder in the United States

National Trends in Third-Line Treatment for Overactive Bladder Among Commercially Insured Women, 2010-2019

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the 2010 introduction of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and the 2013 introduction of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA were associated with an increase in overall utilization of third-line treatments.

METHODS

Using medical claims data from IBM Marketscan database 2010-2019, diagnosis codes were used to identify adult women with overactive bladder. Procedure codes were used to identify third-line treatments. The annual proportion of patients receiving third-line treatments was calculated, as well as the proportion of each treatment received. These were modeled as a function of treatment year using linear regression; a regression coefficient significantly different from 0 was considered evidence of a significant change in utilization over time.

RESULTS

We identified 3,067,515 unique individuals with a diagnosis of overactive bladder, including 14,652 who initiated third-line treatments. The annual percentage of women with overactive bladder who initiated third-line treatment was 0.18% and did not change significantly over 10 years (P = .82). However, the proportion receiving sacral neuromodulation decreased significantly (P <.001), with a compensatory increase in intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA. Within 6 years of its introduction, onabotulinumtoxinA accounted for almost half of third-line treatments initiated.

CONCLUSION

Overall, third-line therapies for non-neurogenic overactive bladder are utilized infrequently among privately insured women. Over the past decade, the introduction of new treatment options has led to a shift in the type of treatment initiated, rather than to an increase in the overall utilization of third-line therapies.

Budget Impact Analysis of Vibegron for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the USA

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) is associated with considerable clinical and economic burden. Treatment of patients with OAB using anticholinergics is limited by tolerability issues and increased anticholinergic burden, which is associated with increased risk of dementia and falls/fractures. This analysis assessed the budget impact of introducing the β3-adrenergic agonist vibegron for the treatment of patients with OAB from US commercial payor and Medicare perspectives.

METHODS

A budget impact model (BIM) with a 5-year time horizon was developed using a top-down, prevalence-based approach and projected market shares for 1-million-member US commercial and Medicare plans. The BIM included vibegron, mirabegron, and anticholinergics, incorporating changes in clinical outcomes (efficacy, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden (ACB), OAB-related comorbidities, and adverse events (AEs)). Costs per member per month (PMPM) and per treated member per month (PTMPM) were determined. One-way sensitivity analyses quantified the impact of changes in key variables.

RESULTS

The introduction of vibegron was associated with a modest increase in PMPM cost over 5 years of $0.12 (range for years 1‒5, $0.01‒$0.26) for commercial payors and $0.24 ($0.01‒$0.52) for Medicare (PTMPM cost: $2.70 ($0.17‒$4.85) and $3.15 ($0.19‒$5.82), respectively). Costs were partially offset by savings related to decreased third-line treatment use, yearly decreases in AE and comorbidity incidence, reduced drug-drug interactions, and reduced ACB associated with vibegron introduction. PMPM costs were most sensitive to vibegron market share assumptions, OAB prevalence, and vibegron persistence at 1 month for private payors and Medicare and additionally vibegron persistence at 12 months for Medicare.

CONCLUSIONS

Vibegron may address unmet needs in treating OAB and is a useful addition to health plans while minimizing risks of anticholinergic AEs, ACB, and drug-drug interactions, which may partially offset increased pharmacy costs.

Peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation in the home treatment of the refractory overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this prospective, open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation (peroneal eTNM^®) using the URIS^® neuromodulation system as a home treatment for refractory overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

The patients were treated with daily peroneal eTNM^® for 30 min over a 6-week period. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of responders, i.e., participants with ≥ 50% reduction in the average daily sum of severe urgency episodes (defined as "I could not postpone voiding but had to rush to the toilet in order not to wet myself") and urgency incontinence episodes. In addition, bladder diary variables, symptom severity (OAB V8 questionnaire), treatment satisfaction (visual analog scale), and pain perception (visual analog scale) were evaluated at baseline (BL), at week 4 (W4), and at the end of treatment (EoT). Safety evaluations included monitoring of the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Changes in time were analyzed using the nonparametric one-way ANOVA Friedman test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the noncategorical variables.

RESULTS

In total, 40 subjects were screened and 29 were included in the full analysis set. The proportion of responders was 86% at W4 and 79% at EoT. There was a significant reduction in frequency (p<0.001), number of severe urgency episodes (p< 0.001), number of urgency incontinence episodes (p=0.001), and number of nocturia episodes (p=0.002). There was a significant improvement in the OAB V8 score and treatment satisfaction (both p<0.001). Two mild treatment-related AEs were recorded. Both patients recovered without sequelae and completed the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Peroneal eTNM^® proved to be a highly effective and safe method for the home treatment of OAB, providing a therapeutic response in approximately 80% of patients.

Evaluating and understanding combination therapy decision drivers for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To understand factors guiding overactive bladder (OAB) therapy selection and experience with combination therapy (antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists).

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys of OAB patients and OAB-treating physicians in the USA were conducted. Patients receiving monotherapy with antimuscarinics were categorized by OAB treatment history: monotherapy only; third-line procedures (e.g., onabotulinumtoxinA injections) and combination therapy; third-line therapy only; and combination therapy only. The patient survey assessed therapy choice drivers and barriers, treatment satisfaction and sociodemographic/clinical characteristics. The physician survey assessed drivers of and barriers to OAB treatment choices.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients, 86.5% reported involvement in treatment decision-making; doctor's recommendation was the most frequently considered factor (84.4%). Most patients (71%) were unaware of combination therapy. The primary reason why those patients aware of combination therapy had not used it (N = 43/200; 21%) was physician recommendation of other treatments (69.8%). For physicians (N = 50), the most frequently considered factors when prescribing OAB treatment were effectiveness (92.0%) and side effects (84.0%); 70% prescribed combination therapy, primarily for symptom severity (82.9%). The main reasons for not prescribing combination therapy were cost/insurance coverage (80%) and lack of information (53.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Shared decision-making guided treatment decisions; the main considerations were treatment safety and efficacy.

A retrospective longitudinal evaluation of new overactive bladder patients in an FPMRS urologist practice: Are patients following up and utilizing third-line therapies?

AIMS

Third-line therapies are efficacious in improving overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms; however, OAB patients have poor follow-up and rarely progress to these therapies. Clinical care pathways (CCP) may improve OAB follow-up rates and third-line therapy use. We sought to determine how new OAB patients follow up and utilize third-line therapies with the implementation of an OAB CCP in a fellowship Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) trained urologist's academic practice.

METHODS

We identified new OAB patients using ICD-9 and 10 codes. They were placed into two groups: pre- and post-CCP use. Basic demographic data were collected. Patients were evaluated in a retrospective longitudinal fashion over 12 months to determine follow-up and third-line therapy utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 769 new OAB patients (261 pre-CCP and 508 post-CCP) were identified. The mean number of follow-up visits increased significantly at 6 months (0.94 vs. 1.64 visits, p = .001) and 12 months (1.26 vs. 2.46 visits, p < .003). Follow-up rates increased significantly at 3 months (38.7% vs. 50.2%, p = .002). Mean time to third-line therapy decreased significantly (280 days vs. 160 days, p = .016). Third-line therapy utilization therapy rates increased at 6 months (7.7% vs. 13.4%, p = .018) and at 12 months (11.1% vs. 16.5%, p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

New OAB patients follow-up and progress to third-line therapies faster and more frequently with the use of a CCP in an FPMRS-trained urologist practice. However, many OAB patients still fail to follow up and overall utilization of third-line therapies remains low. Future studies are warranted to identify factors to why overall OAB compliance remains low.