1
|
Shin BNH, Qu L, Rhee H, Chung E. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of re-intervention rates of new surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2024; 134:155-165. [PMID: 38600763 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the re-intervention rates of new surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) interventions, as the clinical durability of new surgical interventions for BPH is not widely known. METHODS A critical review of new surgical BPH therapies namely 'UroLift®', 'Aquablation', 'Rezum', 'prostatic artery embolisation (PAE)' and 'temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND)' was performed on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between May 2010 and December 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. All relevant articles were reviewed, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Of the 32 studies included, there were 10 randomised controlled trials and 22 prospective observational cohorts. A total of 2400 participants were studied with a median patient age of 66 years, a median prostate volume of 51.9 mL, and a median International Prostate Symptom Score of 22. The lowest re-intervention rate at 12 months was for Aquablation at 0.01%, followed by Rezum at 0.02%, iTIND at 0.03%, and PAE at 0.05%. Network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that the best-ranked treatment at 12 months was transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), followed by Aquablation, iTIND, Rezum, and UroLift. Re-intervention rates with these new BPH interventions are comparable, although some interventions reported better outcomes than TURP in the shorter term. CONCLUSIONS While this systematic review and NMA showed that the re-intervention rate with these new surgical BPH interventions appears to be comparable to TURP in the short term, further studies are required to directly compare these various BPH procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ng Hung Shin
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Liang Qu
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Handoo Rhee
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Eric Chung
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
- AndroUrology Centre, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Netsch C, Gross AJ, Herrmann TR, Herrmann J, Becker B. [Minimally-Invasive Surgical Techniques (MIST): Shedding Light on the Mist]. Aktuelle Urol 2024; 55:219-227. [PMID: 38547919 DOI: 10.1055/a-2269-1280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
As life expectancy increases and there is growing demand for BPH treatments, innovative technologies have been developed, allowing for swift recovery, symptom relief, low complication rates, and the possibility of performing procedures on an outpatient basis, often under local anaesthesia. This review aims to describe the outcomes of newly developed minimally-invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for BPH treatment in terms of functional voiding parameters and sexual function. These therapies are categorized into primarily ablative (Aquablation [Aquabeam]), non-ablative (Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL, Urolift), temporary implantable devices [iTind]), and secondarily ablative procedures (convective water vapor ablation, Rezum, Prostate Artery Embolization [PAE]). All MIST technologies have advanced the medical care of patients with BPH while preserving ejaculation. However, there is a shortage of long-term data specifically addressing re-intervention rates and the preservation of functional voiding parameters. Although there is promising data from regulatory trials and randomized studies, all MIST therapies are potentially associated with severe complications. Patients considering such methods must be thoroughly informed about their inferiority compared with established transurethral procedures like TUR-P and enucleation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas J Gross
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jonas Herrmann
- Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benedikt Becker
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaplan SA, Moss JL, Freedman SJ. Two-year long-term follow-up of treatment with the Optilume BPH catheter system in a randomized controlled trial for benign prostatic hyperplasia (The PINNACLE Study). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00833-z. [PMID: 38684918 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00833-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient outcomes were assessed 2 years after treatment with the Optilume BPH Catheter System, a minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS One-hundred forty-eight adult males with symptomatic BPH were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion to Optilume BPH or Sham (100 Optilume BPH; 48 Sham). Long-term measures include International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), Post-Void Residual Urine (PVR), quality of life measures and sexual function. Follow-up beyond one year was limited to those treated with Optilume BPH. RESULTS At 2 years, 67.5% (56/83 CI 56.3%, 77.4%) of participants in the Optilume BPH arm were symptomatic responders as defined by ≥30% improvement in IPSS without medical or surgical retreatment. IPSS significantly improved from 23.4 ± 5.5 (n = 100) to 11.0 ± 7.0 (n = 74). Qmax improved by 116.8.% (8.9 ± 2.2 (n = 97) to 19.0 ± 16.3 (n = 65)), while PVR showed a slight reduction (83.7 ± 70.3 (n = 99) to 65.9 ± 74.5 (n = 65)). Improvement in uroflowmetry measures was consistent across all prostate volumes. BPH-II improved from 7.0 ± 2.9 (n = 98) to 2.3 ± 2.5 at 1 year (n = 89) and remained consistent at 2.3 ± 2.9 at the 2-years (n = 74), representing a 53.9% improvement. IPSS QoL also improved from 4.6 ± 1.3 (n = 100) at baseline to 2.2 ± 1.5 (n = 74). The most common adverse events reported in the Optilume BPH arm were hematuria and urinary tract infection (UTI). No device and/or treatment related serious adverse events were reported occurring beyond 12 months post-procedure. There was no impact to sexual function. CONCLUSIONS In the PINNACLE study, participants treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System demonstrated continued and durable results at 2 years, affirming tolerability, safety, and the enduring effectiveness. The Optilume BPH Catheter System provides lasting results that are comparable to the more invasive therapies, while preserving the advantages with being a minimally invasive therapy. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04131907.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Kaplan
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
| | - Jared L Moss
- Department of Urology, Ochsner-LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Müllhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Graf N, Mordasini L, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Abt D. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00045-2. [PMID: 38531756 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are two of the surgical options for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of PAE and TURP for LUTS/BPO treatment at long-term follow-up. METHODS We conducted a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial at a Swiss tertiary care centre. The main outcome was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after PAE versus TURP. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, and adverse events assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 mo. Between-group differences in the change from baseline to 5 yr were tested using two-sided Mann-Whitney and t tests. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 103 patients with refractory LUTS/BPO who were randomised between 2014 and 2017, 18/48 who underwent PAE and 38/51 who underwent TURP reached the 60-mo follow-up visit. The mean reduction in IPSS from baseline to 5 yr was -7.78 points after PAE and -11.57 points after TURP (difference 3.79 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.66 to 8.24; p = 0.092). TURP was superior for most patient-reported secondary outcomes except for erectile function. At 5 yr, PAE was less effective than TURP regarding objective parameters, such as the improvement in maximum urinary flow rate (3.59 vs 9.30 ml/s, difference -5.71, 95% CI -10.72 to -0.70; p = 0. 027) and reduction in postvoid residual volume (27.81 vs 219.97 ml; difference 192.15, 95% CI 83.79-300.51; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The improvement in LUTS/BPO at 5 yr after PAE was inferior to that achieved with TURP. The limitations of PAE should be considered during patient selection and counselling. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we show the long-term results of prostate artery embolisation (PAE) in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement causing urinary symptoms. PAE shows good long-term results in properly selected patients, although the improvements are less pronounced than with TURP. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02054013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautier Müllhaupt
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital and School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Spital Thun, Thun, Switzerland.
| | - Lukas Hechelhammer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Graf
- Biostatistics Department, Clinical Trials Unit, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital and School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Uroviva Practice Sursee, Uroviva Group, Sursee, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Peter Schmid
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital and School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel S Engeler
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital and School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Dominik Abt
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital and School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaltsas A, Kratiras Z, Zachariou A, Dimitriadis F, Sofikitis N, Chrisofos M. Evaluating the Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatments on Sexual Health. Biomedicines 2024; 12:110. [PMID: 38255215 PMCID: PMC10813562 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a prevalent condition in older men, is often managed through various surgical interventions. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of these surgical treatments on sexual function, a critical aspect of patient quality of life often overlooked in BPH management. The methodology encompassed a thorough review of contemporary surgical techniques for BPH, including prostate resection, enucleation, vaporization, and minimally invasive therapies such as UroLift, Rezum, and Aquablation. Additionally, the focus was on patient-centered outcomes, with a special emphasis on sexual health following surgery. Findings reveal that, while surgical interventions effectively alleviate BPH symptoms, they often have significant repercussions in sexual function, including erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction. However, emerging techniques demonstrate potential in preserving sexual function, underscoring the need for patient-centric treatment approaches. The study highlights the complex interplay between BPH surgery and sexual health, with minimally invasive treatments showing promise in balancing symptom relief and sexual function preservation. In conclusion, the study advocates for an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to BPH treatment, emphasizing the importance of considering sexual health in therapeutic decision-making. This narrative review suggests a paradigm shift towards minimally invasive techniques could optimize patient outcomes, marrying symptom relief with quality-of-life considerations. The need for further research in this domain is evident, particularly in understanding long-term sexual health outcomes following different surgical interventions for BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aris Kaltsas
- Third Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Zisis Kratiras
- Third Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Athanasios Zachariou
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (A.Z.); (N.S.)
| | - Fotios Dimitriadis
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Nikolaos Sofikitis
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (A.Z.); (N.S.)
| | - Michael Chrisofos
- Third Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.K.); (Z.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salem J, Becher KF, Bschleipfer T, Dreikorn K, Höfner K, Madersbacher S, Magistro G, Muschter R, Oelke M, Reich O, Rieken M, Schönburg S, Abt D. [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:58-66. [PMID: 38193989 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02249-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive for benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) are one of the most frequent diseases in men and can have a significant impact on quality of life. Instrumental therapies are common, and many patients seek minimally invasive treatment options. OBJECTIVE Presentation and evidence-based evaluation of the minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Summary and overview of chapters 11-13 on minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO of the current long version of the German S2e guideline. RESULTS In case of absolute indication for surgery or after unsatisfactory or undesired medical therapy, minimally invasive treatments such as UroLift® (Neotract Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA), Rezῡm™ (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA, USA), iTIND™ (Olympus America Inc., Westborough, MA, USA), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) can be considered. These indirect/delayed ablative therapies offer lower morbidity and the possibility of performing them under local anesthesia, but they are inferior to direct ablative/resective techniques in terms of effectiveness and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS The updated German S2e guideline summarizes evidence-based recommendations for new minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO, which present alternative treatment options for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Salem
- CUROS urologisches Zentrum, Klinik LINKS VOM RHEIN, Schillingsrotterstr. 39-41, 50996, Köln, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg a.d. Havel, MHB Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d. Havel, Deutschland.
| | - Klaus F Becher
- Klinik für Rehabilitation, Klinik Wartenberg Professor Dr. Selmair GmbH & Co. KG, Wartenberg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Bschleipfer
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Regiomed Klinikum, Coburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Klaus Höfner
- Klinik für Urologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Oberhausen, Deutschland
| | | | - Giuseppe Magistro
- Klinik für Urologie, Asklepios Westklinikum GmbH, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Rolf Muschter
- Urologische Abteilung, ALTA Klinik, Bielefeld, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Oelke
- Klinik für Urologie, St. Antonius-Hospital GmbH, Gronau, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Sandra Schönburg
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Deutschland
| | - Dominik Abt
- Klinik für Urologie, Spitalzentrum, Biel, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leonardi R, Ambrosini F, Malinaric R, Cafarelli A, Calarco A, Colombo R, De Cobelli O, De Marco F, Ferrari G, Ludovico G, Pecoraro S, Tuzzolo D, Terrone C, Mantica G. New minimally invasive solutions for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) management: A position paper from the UrOP (Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata). Arch Ital Urol Androl 2023; 95:12003. [PMID: 38117214 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2023.12003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
To the Editor, In recent years, alternative solutions have been proposed to obtain effective results comparable to TURP, which is currently considered the gold standard, and laser vapo-enucleation techniques (1, 2), but with the possibility of maintaining sexual functions. In recent years there has been a growing trend towards ejaculation preservation. Although the results of TURP (3), and most laser enucleation techniques are undoubted in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management, they often lack in the preservation of ejaculation. All the alternative recently proposed interventions (Rezum, AquaBeam, Urolift, TPLA, i-TIND, LEST) are procedures considered by some authors to be promising in both managing BPO and preserving sexual functions. However, all these methods are limited by a lack of long-term follow-up that would evaluate the efficacy over time, possible complications related to the method and the correct patient selection for a specific method. The aim of this letter is to summarize the available evidence and provide clinicians with practical recommendations on the use of the brand new minimally invasive techniques for the management of BPO. [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosario Leonardi
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Casa di Cura Musumeci GECAS, Gravina di Catania.
| | | | | | - Angelo Cafarelli
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Urology Unit, Villa Igea, Ancona.
| | - Alessandro Calarco
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Villa Pia Hospital, Via Folco Portinari 5, Rome.
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Department of Urology, Vita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan.
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.
| | | | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Hesperia Hospital, Modena.
| | - Giuseppe Ludovico
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); Ospedale Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari.
| | | | | | - Carlo Terrone
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova.
| | - Guglielmo Mantica
- Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata (UrOP); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amparore D, De Cillis S, Schulman C, Kadner G, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Temporary implantable nitinol device for benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms: over 48-month results. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:743-751. [PMID: 37350585 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05322-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study (MT02) reports >48-month (50-79 months) results of a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT02145208) of temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind®) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS Men with symptomatic BPH (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] ≥10, Maximum flow rate [Qmax] <12 mL/s, and prostate volume <75 mL) from 9 centers were enrolled from December 2014 to December 2016. Total 50/81 (62%) patients at 3/9 sites (Italy, Switzerland, and Belgium), pursued the study beyond 36 months following iTind® device, per study protocol. Due to COVID-19, follow-up was amended. Each patient was assessed once during 50-79 months postoperatively for IPSS and IPSS-quality of life (IPSS-QoL), change in medication, need for surgical re-treatment and adverse events telephonically. RESULTS Post 36 month-follow-up, 5 patients were lost to follow-up and 2 patients died unrelated to iTind® device placement. Two patients (36-48 months follow-up) required surgical re-treatments (1 transurethral resection of prostate, 1 Thulium laser enucleation of prostate). >48 months results were available for 41 patients wherein iTind® device treatment showed significant improvement in symptoms (IPSS: -45.3%, P<0.0001 and IPSS-QoL: -45.1%, P<0.0001) from baseline to 79 months post-procedure; mean±SD of 11.26±7.67 and 2.10±1.41 points, respectively. No complications were recorded between 36 up to 79 months; no patient required additional medication. CONCLUSIONS iTind® device provided significant and durable symptom reduction and improved IPSS-QoL for >48 months post treatment. No late postoperative complications were reported beyond 36 months of follow-up. Surgical re-treatment rate for >36 months was 4%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Claude Schulman
- Division of Urology, CHIREC Cancer Institute, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gregor Kadner
- Division of Urology, Kantonsspital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lebdai S, Ben Boujema M, Benard A, Barry Delongchamps N, Benchikh A, Bruyere F, Della Negra E, Descazeaud A, Doizi S, Fourmarier M, Mallet R, Misrai V, Pelegrin T, Rouscoff Y, Ruffion A, Villers A, Saillour F, Robert G. Standardized technique for ejaculation preservation during prostatic endoscopic ablative surgery. World J Urol 2023; 41:3041-3049. [PMID: 37715788 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04592-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ejaculatory dysfunction is the most common side effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Modified techniques have emerged with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation without compromising obstruction relief. None are standardized or validated. The PARTURP study is a randomized study investigating partial versus complete prostate resection. We conducted an investigator consensus meeting to define the ideal surgical technique to achieve both correct obstruction relief with ejaculation preservation. METHODS An expert consensus meeting involving all investigators of the PARTURP study took place to define a common technique using the nominal group methodology. The objectives were to define the areas to be resected and the areas to be preserved; to define the criteria for proper obstruction relief; to define the criteria for proper ejaculation preservation. RESULTS All investigators (n = 15) attended the consensus meeting, and agreement between all the participants was obtained. The anatomical landmarks to be preserved are located around the verumontanum and along the posterior part of the prostatic urethra. These structures must be preserved up to 2 cm from the verumontanum. The participants agreed on the need to preserve the urethral mucosa in all the areas to be preserved and to reach the enucleation plane in the areas of resection. CONCLUSIONS Anatomical landmarks for ejaculation-sparing surgery have been defined by the investigators of the PARTURP randomized study. These landmarks will be used during the study, and the clinical outcomes of this ejaculation-sparing technique will be compared with complete resection with up to 3 years follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souhil Lebdai
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Angers, CHU Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
| | - Méric Ben Boujema
- Methodology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antoine Benard
- Methodology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Amine Benchikh
- Urology Department, Clinique Des Franciscaines, Versailles, France
| | - Franck Bruyere
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | | | | | - Steeve Doizi
- Urology Department, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| | | | - Richard Mallet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Prive Francheville, Périgueux, France
| | | | | | - Yohan Rouscoff
- Urology Department, Polyclinique Saint Georges, Nice, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France
- EA 3738-CICLY EMR UCBL Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Arnaud Villers
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Florence Saillour
- Methodology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Busetto GM, Checchia A, Recchia M, Tocci E, Falagario UG, Annunziata G, Annese P, d’Altilia N, Mancini V, Ferro M, Crocetto F, Tataru OS, Gianfrancesco LD, Porreca A, Giudice FD, Berardinis ED, Bettocchi C, Cormio L, Carrieri G. Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea? Asian J Androl 2023; 26:00129336-990000000-00138. [PMID: 37921510 PMCID: PMC10919430 DOI: 10.4103/aja202357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The increasing importance of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), while avoiding side effects and maintaining sexual function, has allowed for the development of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs). Recently, the European Association of Urology guidelines reported a paradigm shift from the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to the management of nonneurogenic male LUTS. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used MISTs: ablative techniques such as aquablation, prostatic artery embolization, water vapor energy, and transperineal prostate laser ablation, and nonablative techniques such as prostatic urethral lift and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND). MISTs are becoming a new promise, even if clinical trials with longer follow-up are still lacking. Most of them are still under investigation and, to date, only a few options have been given as a recommendation for use. They cannot be considered as standard of care and are not suitable for all patients. Advantages and disadvantages should be underlined, without forgetting our objective: treatment of LUTS and re-treatment avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Maria Busetto
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Andrea Checchia
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “G. Tatarella” Hospital, Cerignola 71042, Italy
| | - Marco Recchia
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “G. Tatarella” Hospital, Cerignola 71042, Italy
| | - Edoardo Tocci
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | | | | | - Pasquale Annese
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Nicola d’Altilia
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Vito Mancini
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Urology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | | | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- G. E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures 540142, Romania
| | - Luca Di Gianfrancesco
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Padua 35128, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Padua 35128, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Roma 00161, Italy
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Roma 00161, Italy
| | - Carlo Bettocchi
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Luigi Cormio
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Urology Unit, “L. Bonomo” Hospital, Andria 76123, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hughes T, Harper P, Somani BK. Treatment Algorithm for Management of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Overview of Current Techniques. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2077. [PMID: 37895457 PMCID: PMC10608556 DOI: 10.3390/life13102077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) should involve a treatment algorithm that takes into account prostate size, and patient's symptoms and preference with the aim of helping with urinary symptoms and enhance quality of life. The diagnostic assessment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) should be comprehensive to help choose the best management strategy. Strategies from lifestyle modifications to medical treatment with alpha blockers and/or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors to surgical procedures can all be used in the management algorithm. Surgical management ranges from transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) to minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) including laser therapies such as Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) and photoselective vaporisation (PVP), aquablation, Rezūm system, prostate artery embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) and Optilume BPH catheter system. BPO is a common urological condition that has a significant impact on quality of life and economic burden globally and is likely to become increasingly prevalent with an ageing population. Selecting the most appropriate treatment modality will depend on the individual patient preferences, availability of resources, cost, anatomical factors and the goals of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hughes
- Department of Urology, South Warwickshire University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick CV34 5BW, UK;
| | - Philip Harper
- Department of Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Bhaskar K. Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dey A, Mamoulakis C, Hasan N, Yuan Y, Shakil A, Omar MI. Emerging Technologies for the Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00201-8. [PMID: 37741783 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or vaporisation. Apart from established ablation modes according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, various technologies have emerged as safe/effective alternatives but remain under investigation. OBJECTIVE To explore short-term benefits/harms of emerging technologies for surgical management of LUTS/BPO. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL via Ovid up to June 18, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), Rezum, prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) versus sham/transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We included ten RCTs (1108 men). Aquablation versus TURP: insignificant change in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS; mean difference [MD] 0.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.44 to 2.44), quality of life (QoL; MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.21), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; MD -0.30, 95% CI -3.71 to 3.11), retreatment (risk ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.66), and urinary incontinence (UI; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95). PAE versus monopolar TURP (M-TURP): insignificant change in IPSS (MD 3.33, 95% CI -28.39 to 35.05), QoL (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.54), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5; MD 3.07, 95% CI -1.78 to 7.92), and UI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.86), and significant change in Qmax (MD -9.52, 95% CI -14.04 to -5.0), favouring M-TURP. PAE versus bipolar TURP: insignificant change in IPSS (MD -2.80, 95% CI -6.61 to 1.01), QoL (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.46 to 0.08), Qmax (MD -3.51, 95% CI -8.08 to 1.06), UI (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.51), and retreatment (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.19-19.63). PUL versus TURP: insignificant change in QoL (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.09), UI (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.05), and retreatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12-1.86), and significant change in IPSS (MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.22-6.58), and IIEF-5 (MD 3.00, 95% CI 0.41-5.59) and Qmax (MD -9.60, 95% CI -13.44 to -5.76), favouring PUL and TURP, respectively. Rezum and iTIND have not been evaluated in RCTs against TURP to date. CONCLUSIONS Supporting evidence for clinical use of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits/harms should be investigated further in high-quality RCTs. PATIENT SUMMARY This review summarises the evidence for the clinical use of aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), Rezum, and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) to manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. The supporting evidence for the clinical usage of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits and harms should be investigated further in high-quality randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Dey
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ambreen Shakil
- Institute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baboudjian M, Cornu JN, Gondran-Tellier B, Fourmarier M, Robert G, Peyronnet B, Misrai V, Pradere B. Pharmacologic and Surgical Retreatment After Office-based Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:727-733. [PMID: 36906484 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Office-based treatments are increasingly offered as an optional step to replace medical treatment or delay surgery for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Nevertheless, little is known regarding the risks of retreatment. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding retreatment rates after water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND) procedures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was conducted up to June 2022 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The primary outcomes were the rates of pharmacologic and surgical retreatment during follow-up. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 36 studies including 6380 patients met our inclusion criteria. Surgical and minimally invasive retreatment rates were generally well reported in the studies included and reached up to 5% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 4% for WVTT and 13% for PUL after 5 yr of follow-up. The types and rates of pharmacologic retreatment are poorly reported in the literature, with the latter reaching up to 7% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 11% after 5 yr of follow-up for WVTT and PUL. The main limitations of our review are the unclear to high risk of bias in most of the studies included and the lack of long-term (>5 yr) data on retreatment risks. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the low retreatment rates at mid-term follow-up after office-based treatments for LUTS, supporting the development of these strategies as an intermediate step between BPH medication and conventional surgery. Pending more robust data with longer follow-up, these results should be used to improve patient information and facilitate shared decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY Our review highlights the low risk of mid-term retreatment after office-based treatments for benign enlargement of the prostate that is affecting urinary function. For well-selected patients, these results support the increasing use of office-based treatment as an intermediate option before conventional surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, APHM, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jean-Nicolas Cornu
- Department of Urology, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France
| | | | - Marc Fourmarier
- Department of Urology, CH Aix-Pertuis, Aix en Provence, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Vincent Misrai
- Department of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Murad L, Bouhadana D, Nguyen DD, Chughtai B, Zorn KC, Bhojani N, Elterman DS. Treating LUTS in Men with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review Article. Drugs Aging 2023; 40:815-836. [PMID: 37556075 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01054-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is a prevalent condition that affects men, primarily toward their old age. The condition is often accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which can significantly impair a patient's quality of life and lead to other medical complications. Accurate diagnosis of BPO is essential for effective management of complications secondary to BPO, and treatment plans should be tailored patients, and occasionally according to surgeon experience. As such, this literature review aims to analyze the current available data on male LUTS secondary to BPO by providing a comprehensive overview of relevant studies, as well as the surgical and medical management guidelines from the Canadian Urological Association (CUA), American Urological Association (AUA), and European Association of Urology (EAU). By synthesizing the existing literature, this review purports to summarize the current body of knowledge surrounding BPO and male LUTS, and support healthcare providers in making informed decisions about the management of male LUTS secondary to BPO, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Murad
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Bouhadana
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Zorn
- Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Dean S Elterman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gravas S, Gacci M, Gratzke C, Herrmann TRW, Karavitakis M, Kyriazis I, Malde S, Mamoulakis C, Rieken M, Sakalis VI, Schouten N, Speakman MJ, Tikkinen KAO, Cornu JN. Summary Paper on the 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Management of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol 2023; 84:207-222. [PMID: 37202311 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common, often bothersome, and have multifactorial aetiology. OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2023 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on the management of male LUTS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A structured literature search from 1966 to 2021 selected the articles with the highest certainty evidence. The Delphi technique consensus approach was used to develop the recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The assessment of men with LUTS should be practical. A careful medical history and physical examination are essential. Validated symptom scores, urine test, uroflowmetry, and postvoid urine residual, as well as frequency-volume charts for patients with nocturia or predominately storage symptoms should be used. Prostate-specific antigen should be ordered if a diagnosis of prostate cancer changes the treatment plan. Urodynamics should be performed for selected patients. Men with mild symptoms are candidates for watchful waiting. Behavioural modification should be offered to men with LUTS prior to, or concurrent with, treatment. The choice of medical treatment depends on the assessment findings, predominant type of symptoms, ability of the treatment to change the findings, and the expectations to be met in terms of the speed of onset, efficacy, side effects, and disease progression. Surgery is reserved for men with absolute indications, and for patients who fail or prefer not to receive medical therapy. Surgical management has been divided into five sections: resection, enucleation, vaporisation, and alternative ablative and nonablative techniques. The choice of surgical technique depends on patient's characteristics, expectations, and preferences; surgeon's expertise; and availability of modalities. CONCLUSIONS The guidelines provide an evidence-based approach for the management of male LUTS. PATIENT SUMMARY A clinical assessment should identify the cause(s) of symptoms and define the clinical profile and patient's expectations. The treatment should aim to ameliorate symptoms and reduce the risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Gravas
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Markos Karavitakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Iason Kyriazis
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sachin Malde
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Vasileios I Sakalis
- Department of Urology, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Natasha Schouten
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Speakman
- Department of Urology, Taunton & Somerset Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | - Kari A O Tikkinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Jean-Nicolas Cornu
- Department of Urology, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Porto JG, Arbelaez MCS, Blachman-Braun R, Bhatia A, Bhatia S, Satyanarayana R, Marcovich R, Shah HN. Complications associated with minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database review. World J Urol 2023; 41:1975-1982. [PMID: 37222779 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04440-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE MAUDE database houses medical device reports of suspected device-related complications received by Food and Drug Administration. In the present study we aim to evaluate the MAUDE database for reported complications of MIST procedures. METHODS The database was queried using keywords: rezum, urolift, prostate embolization (PAE), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), prostate stent and Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTIND) on 10/1/22 to extract information regarding device problems and procedure-related complications. Gupta classification system was used to stratify complications. Statistical analysis was performed to compare frequency of complications among MIST procedures. RESULTS We found a total of 692 reports (Rezum-358, urolift-226, PAE-53, TUNA-31, TUMT-19, prostatic stent-4, and iTIND-1). Most complications related to device or users were minor (level 1 and 2) and there was no significant difference among various MIST procedures. The screen/system error was responsible for 93% and 83% aborted cases in Rezum and TUNA, respectively, and PAE showed 40% of device component detachment/fracture. Overall Urolift and TUMT were associated with statistically significant higher incidence of major (level 3 and 4) complications (23% and 21%, respectively) as compared with Rezum (7%). Most major complications needing hospitalization after Urolift included hematoma and hematuria with clots and those after Rezum included urinary tract infection and sepsis. Thirteen deaths were reported, mostly due to cardiovascular events, which were classified as not associated with the proposed treatment. CONCLUSION MIST for BPH can occasionally cause significant morbidity. Our data should assist urologists and patients in shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao G Porto
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA
| | | | - Ruben Blachman-Braun
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Ansh Bhatia
- Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shivank Bhatia
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Ramgopal Satyanarayana
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Robert Marcovich
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Hemendra N Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Kollenburg RAA, van Riel LAMJG, de Bruin DM, de Reijke TM, Oddens JR. Novel minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2023; 49:411-427. [PMID: 37267609 PMCID: PMC10482440 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review and compare the effectivity of novel minimally invasive treatments (MITs) to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men. METHODS Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to December 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating MITs, compared to TURP or sham, in men with LUTS. Studies were assessed by risk of bias tool, and evidence by GRADE. Functional outcomes by means of uroflowmetry and IPSS were the primary outcomes, safety and sexual function were secondary outcomes. As part of this review, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. MITs were ranked based on functional outcome improvement probability. RESULTS In total, 10 RCTs were included, evaluating aquablation, prostatic urethral lift, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), convective water vapor thermal treatment or temporary implantable nitinol device. All MITs showed a better safety profile compared to TURP. Functional outcome improvement following aquablation were comparable to TURP. In the NMA, aquablation was ranked highest, PAE followed with the second highest probability to improve functional outcomes. Other novel MITs resulted in worse functional outcomes compared to TURP. Level of evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSIONS Five MITs for treatment of LUTS were identified. Aquablation is likely to result in functional outcomes most comparable to TURP. Second in ranking was PAE, a technique that does not require general or spinal anesthesia. MITs have a better safety profile compared to TURP. However, due to high study heterogeneity, results should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robertus Arnoldus Antonius van Kollenburg
- University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam UMCDepartment of UrologyNetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Netherlands
| | - Luigi Antonio Maria Johannes Gerardus van Riel
- University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam UMCDepartment of UrologyNetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Martijn de Bruin
- University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam UMCDepartment of UrologyNetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Netherlands
| | - Theodorus Maria de Reijke
- University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam UMCDepartment of UrologyNetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Netherlands
| | - Jorg Reinier Oddens
- University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsAmsterdam UMCDepartment of UrologyNetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Niu X, Liu B. Six novel minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2023; 52:162-168. [PMID: 37283100 DOI: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. When drug treatment is ineffective or conventional surgery is not suitable, novel minimally invasive therapies can be considered. These include prostatic urethral lift, prostatic artery embolisation, water vapor thermal therapy, Aquablation-image guided robotic waterjet ablation, temporary implantable nitinol device and prostatic stents. These novel therapies can be performed in outpatient setting under local anesthesia, with shorter operative and recovery times, and better protection of ejaculatory function and erectile function. General conditions of the patient and advantages and disadvantages of the each of these therapies should be fully considered to make individualized plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyang Niu
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| | - Ben Liu
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Franco JV, Tesolin P, Jung JH. Update on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the role of minimally invasive procedures. Prostate Int 2023; 11:1-7. [PMID: 36910900 PMCID: PMC9995694 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia constitute a substantial burden, affecting the quality of life of those affected by this condition. While watchful waiting and medical management using a wide array of pharmaceuticals can be effective, surgery has been one of the most definite solutions for those highly affected by this condition. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical procedure, but other alternatives using laser (HoLEP and ThuLEP) and robotic water jets (Aquablation) are emerging treatments aimed at reducing postoperative morbidity. Minimally invasive procedures conducted in outpatient settings and under local anesthesia or sedation are increasingly being used, especially in those patients with high surgical risk due to comorbidities. These procedures include prostatic arterial embolization, water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), prostatic urethral lift (Urolift), temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND/iTIND), and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). The evidence supporting these treatments is growing, but some uncertainties remain as to what is the magnitude of their advantages and disadvantages compared to TURP. Innovations in the technologies involved in these new procedures may improve their profile for effectiveness and safety. Moreover, new devices are being investigated for marketing approval. Issues around costs and patients' preferences are also yet to be elucidated, thus their evolving role needs to be weighed against the aforementioned considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan V.A. Franco
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Corresponding author. Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Pablo Tesolin
- Family and Community Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Elterman D, Aubé-Peterkin M, Evans H, Elmansy H, Meskawi M, Zorn KC, Bhojani N. UPDATE - Canadian Urological Association guideline: Male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:245-256. [PMID: 35905485 PMCID: PMC9343161 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Elterman
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Howard Evans
- Division of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Hazem Elmansy
- Division of Urology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Malek Meskawi
- Division of Urology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kevin C. Zorn
- Division of Urology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Division of Urology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sze C, Chughtai B, Kaplan SA. I Can't Get No Satisfaction: Patient-reported Outcomes After Different Treatment Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:377-379. [PMID: 35337774 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Effective clinical management of benign prostatic obstruction is determined by the ability to address lower urinary tract symptoms as measured via patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) offer better erectile or ejaculatory side effects and potentially faster recovery time in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Premature excitement for MISTs derives from prospective sham-controlled trials with several years of follow-up data. Currently there is a lack of randomized controlled trials that directly compare MISTs to TURP and of a clearer definition of treatment failure. These types of studies are important in comparing efficacy between treatments. In head-to-head comparison, TURP yields the most robust improvement in PROs when compared to MISTs. At best, MISTs may achieve equivalent urological symptom-relief profiles to TURP; however, noninferiority assessments are needed. MISTs are potentially advantageous for their side-effect profiles and lower complication rates, but consistency in reporting these data is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the current data on patient-reported outcomes after each type of treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. We found that the efficacy of these procedures is difficult to compare given the lack of direct studies comparing new options to the standard procedure. We can only conclude that the standard procedure, transurethral resection of the prostrate, will provide the best relief of voiding symptoms as reported by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Sze
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven A Kaplan
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Functional Results after First- and Second-Generation Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device (TIND) for BPH: A Narrative Review of the Literature. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-022-00644-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of review
In the last decades, new promising technologies for the treatment of BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have been widely experienced in clinical practice, with the aim of offering fewer complications but similar functional outcomes compared with the gold standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Among these so-called minimally invasive approaches, transurethral implantation of first- and second-generation temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND and iTIND, respectively) (Medi-Tate; Medi-Tate Ltd., Or Akiva, Israel) has been included by the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines as one of the available alternative treatments to TURP. In the present paper, we conducted a systematic review of the current literature on TIND and iTIND implantation focusing on functional outcomes. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried for relevant Literature in May 2021.
Recent findings
Data regarding the use of temporary implantable nitinol device for BPH are still very limited, with only seven studies currently available in Literature. All the studies report that both TIND and iTIND procedures are safe, effective, and well tolerated. Moreover, such treatments seem to not affect patient’s sexual and ejaculatory functions.
Summary
Current clinical evidence suggests that temporary implantation of first- and second-generation temporary implantable nitinol devices are valid options for the minimally invasive surgical treatment of BPH-related LUTS. Further studies are required in order to confirm the functional results, especially over a long-term follow up.
Collapse
|
23
|
Gao B, Lu S, Bhojani N, Zorn KC, Chughtai B, Elterman D. Office-Based Procedures for BPH. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:63. [PMID: 34913101 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01081-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in men. A rapidly rising demand for safe and effective therapy for BPH has generated novel minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs). With multiple procedural options in the urology armamentarium for BPH therapy, we describe the current therapies and outcomes for office-based procedures for BPH including quality of life, voiding symptoms, and sexual function. RECENT FINDINGS There are three FDA-approved MISTs (Rezūm, Urolift, and iTind) and three emerging MISTs for BPH. Preliminary data suggest improvement in voiding symptoms and quality of life while minimizing unwanted sexual side effects. Long term data is required on the durability and safety of MISTs for BPH. MISTs mark a paradigm shift in BPH management. Sandwiched between conservative medical management and conventional transurethral surgery, these novel technologies promise to combine efficacy approaching that of TURP while sparing the negative side effects. We envision a future where BPH can be diagnosed and treated in an office-based setting with a standard cystoscope in one procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Gao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Room 503G, 149 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Steven Lu
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal (CHUM), 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Kevin C Zorn
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal (CHUM), 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 25 East 68th Street, Starr 9, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dean Elterman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Room 503G, 149 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada. .,UHN - Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, MP-8-317, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Franco JVA, Jung JH, Imamura M, Borofsky M, Omar MI, Escobar Liquitay CM, Young S, Golzarian J, Veroniki AA, Garegnani L, Dahm P. Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis. BJU Int 2021; 130:142-156. [PMID: 34820997 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and ranking of minimally invasive treatments (MITs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched multiple databases up to 24 February 2021. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the following treatments: convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT; or Rezūm); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL; or Urolift); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham surgery. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. RESULTS We included 27 trials involving 3017 men. The overall certainty of the evidence of most outcomes according to GRADE was low to very low. Compared to TURP, we found that PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urological symptoms, while WVTT, TUMT and TIND may result in worse urological symptoms. MITs may result in little to no difference in quality of life, compared to TURP. MITs may result in a large reduction in major adverse events compared to TURP. We were uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP, however, TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates. We were very uncertain of the effects of MITs on erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among MITs, PUL and PAE had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and quality of life, TUMT for major adverse events, WVTT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. Excluding WVTT and TIND, for which there were only studies with short-term (3-month) follow-up, PUL had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for retreatment. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life compared to TURP at short-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Victor Ariel Franco
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.,Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Borofsky
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Luis Garegnani
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Urology Section, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Manfredi C, Arcaniolo D, Spatafora P, Crocerossa F, Fusco F, Verze P, Fiori C, Damiano R, Cindolo L, DE Sio M, Otero JR. Emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes and description of complications. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:389-399. [PMID: 34308611 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04530-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several minimally invasive surgical procedures have been proposed as alternative therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The present systematic review aimed to describe the functional outcomes and complications of emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for BPH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive bibliographic search on the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. No chronological restriction was applied. Retrospective and prospective primary studies were included. A meta-analysis of IPSS, IPSS-QoL, Qmax, and PVR was performed. Data on adverse events were presented narratively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 18 studies were included. Thirteen papers were eligible for the meta-analysis. iTIND, Rezūm, and Aquablation were associated with a significant improvement in IPSS (p<0.001), IPSS-QoL (p<0.001), and Qmax (p<0.001) compared to baseline. A significant reduction of PVR from baseline was found with Rezūm (p<0.001) and Aquablation (p<0.001) but not iTIND (p=0.22). A significant difference in IPSS, IPSS-QoL, and Qmax was shown in favor of Aquablation compared to Rezūm and iTIND (p<0.001). Rezūm and iTIND were mainly associated with mild to moderate adverse effects. Hematuria or bleeding was reported in all studies regarding Aquablation (0.8%-26%), the need for transfusion or intervention for bleeding varied between 1.8% and 9%. CONCLUSIONS Aquablation, Rezūm, and iTIND significantly improve urinary functional outcomes compared to baseline; however, Aquablation would seem to lead to better functional results compared to the other procedures. Rezūm and iTIND appear to have an excellent safety profile, while Aquablation would seem to expose patients to a nonnegligible risk of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Manfredi
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy -
| | - Davide Arcaniolo
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Spatafora
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of, Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Luca Cindolo
- Department of Urology, Villa Stuart Private Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco DE Sio
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Javier R Otero
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.,Unit of Urology, HM Hospitales, Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Franco JV, Jung JH, Imamura M, Borofsky M, Omar MI, Escobar Liquitay CM, Young S, Golzarian J, Veroniki AA, Garegnani L, Dahm P. Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD013656. [PMID: 34693990 PMCID: PMC8543673 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013656.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of minimally invasive treatments are available as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, it is unclear which treatments provide better results. OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH through a network meta-analysis. Our secondary objective was to obtain an estimate of relative ranking of these minimally invasive treatments, according to their effects. SEARCH METHODS We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 24 February 2021. We had no restrictions on language of publication or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the following minimally invasive treatments, compared to TURP or sham treatment, on men with moderate to severe LUTS due to BPH: convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy (CRFWVT); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model for pair-wise comparisons and a frequentist network meta-analysis for combined estimates. We interpreted them according to Cochrane methods. We planned subgroup analyses by age, prostate volume, and severity of baseline symptoms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs to express continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 trials involving 3017 men, mostly over age 50, with severe LUTS due to BPH. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low due to concerns regarding bias, imprecision, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and incoherence. Based on the network meta-analysis, results for our main outcomes were as follows. Urologic symptoms (19 studies, 1847 participants): PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urologic symptoms scores (MD of International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS]) compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD range 0 to 35; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 1.47, 95% CI -4.00 to 6.93; PAE: 1.55, 95% CI -1.23 to 4.33; low-certainty evidence). CRFWVT, TUMT, and TIND may result in worse urologic symptoms scores compared to TURP at short-term follow-up, but the CIs include little to no difference (CRFWVT: 3.6, 95% CI -4.25 to 11.46; TUMT: 3.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 7.10; TIND: 7.5, 95% CI -0.68 to 15.69; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (QoL) (13 studies, 1459 participants): All interventions may result in little to no difference in the QoL scores, compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD of IPSS-QoL score; MD range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 0.06, 95% CI -1.17 to 1.30; PAE: 0.09, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.75; CRFWVT: 0.37, 95% CI -1.45 to 2.20; TUMT: 0.65, 95% CI -0.48 to 1.78; TIND: 0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to 2.79; low-certainty evidence). Major adverse events (15 studies, 1573 participants): TUMT probably results in a large reduction of major adverse events compared to TURP (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; moderate-certainty evidence). PUL, CRFWVT, TIND and PAE may also result in a large reduction in major adverse events, but CIs include substantial benefits and harms at three months to 36 months; PUL: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.22; CRFWVT: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 18.62; TIND: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01 to 24.46; PAE: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.68; low-certainty evidence). Retreatment (10 studies, 799 participants): We are uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP (12 to 60 months; PUL: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.1; PAE: RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.44; very low-certainty evidence). TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates (RR 9.71, 95% CI 2.35 to 40.13; low-certainty evidence). Erectile function (six studies, 640 participants): We are very uncertain of the effects of minimally invasive treatments on erectile function (MD of International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]; range 5 to 25; higher scores indicates better function; CRFWVT: 6.49, 95% CI -8.13 to 21.12; TIND: 5.19, 95% CI -9.36 to 19.74; PUL: 3.00, 95% CI -5.45 to 11.44; PAE: -0.03, 95% CI -6.38, 6.32; very low-certainty evidence). Ejaculatory dysfunction (eight studies, 461 participants): We are uncertain of the effects of PUL, PAE and TUMT on ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; PUL: RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00 to 1.06; PAE: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; TUMT: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; low-certainty evidence). TURP is the reference treatment with the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms, QoL and retreatment, but the least favorable in terms of major adverse events, erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among minimally invasive procedures, PUL and PAE have the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and QoL, TUMT for major adverse events, PUL for retreatment, CRFWVT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and QoL compared to TURP at short-term follow-up. They may result in fewer major adverse events, especially in the case of PUL and PAE; resulting in better rankings for symptoms scores. PUL may result in fewer retreatments compared to other interventions, especially TUMT, which had the highest retreatment rates at long-term follow-up. We are very uncertain about the effects of these interventions on erectile function. There was limited long-term data, especially for CRFWVT and TIND. Future high-quality studies with more extended follow-up, comparing different, active treatment modalities, and adequately reporting critical outcomes relevant to patients, including those related to sexual function, could provide more information on the relative effectiveness of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Va Franco
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, South
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Borofsky
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Luis Garegnani
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Urology Section, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garman T, Cho A, Stoddard MD, Kilemnik I, Malka V, Elterman D, Chughtai B. The Mechanism of Action of cTIND for Minimally Invasive Ischemic Incision of the Prostate: In Vivo Study. Urology 2021; 157:217-221. [PMID: 34058242 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand the histologic changes of prostate tissue induced by temporary implantable nitinol device (cTIND) in a canine model. METHODS The cTIND is a small, symmetric device comprised of nitinol wire loops welded together on an axis, which exert radial force on the tissue to induce a targeted ischemic effect. The cTIND was implanted in three live canine models, which were monitored for 14 days post-index procedure. Device placement was monitored via serial fluoroscopy and biologic effects of cTIND were studied via histopathology. RESULTS The cTIND was successfully placed in the canine models and remained securely in position until the animal was sacrificed on postoperative day 14. The cTIND treated tissue demonstrated an abrupt transition from normal, viable prostatic glandular tissue to an area of shrunken necrosis and fibrosis between the two. CONCLUSION In the canine models, the cTIND created focal areas of ischemic necrosis resulting in incisions in the peri-urethral prostate with minimal inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Garman
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Ahra Cho
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Michelina D Stoddard
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Dean Elterman
- Department of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pascoe J, Fontaine C, Hashim H. Modern advancements in minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic obstruction. Ther Adv Urol 2021; 13:17562872211030832. [PMID: 34349840 PMCID: PMC8287272 DOI: 10.1177/17562872211030832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A wide variety of minimally invasive surgical techniques are now being offered for treating voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). These options offer an alternative to both medical therapy and traditional surgical options. Minimally invasive surgical treatments in LUTS/BPO boast both day case and local anaesthetic options, with a potentially reduced side effect profile compared to traditional surgical interventions matching the needs for a range of patients. We provide a narrative review of minimally invasive surgical treatments available for BPO in terms of the technology, efficacy, safety, institutional recommendations, cost and potential future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pascoe
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, University Hospitals Plymouth, Derriford Rd, Devon PL6 8DH, UK
| | - Christina Fontaine
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, University Hospitals Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Hashim Hashim
- Consultant Urological Surgeon and Honorary Professor in Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, Somerset, UK
| |
Collapse
|